2008-11-20 - #: 8646-C12-200815400 - Avis public 2008-19 - Examen des pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs de services Internet
Déposer en utilisant les services en ligne
Calendrier
- Avis Public 2008-19
Activités |
Dates limites |
Avis d'intention de participer | 2008-12-19 |
Audience publique | 2009-07-06 |
Demandes de renseignements | 2008-12-04 |
Réponses aux demandes de renseignements | 2009-01-13 |
Demandes de divulgation | 2009-01-19 |
Réponses aux demandes de divulgation | 2009-01-26 |
Réponses aux demandes de divulgation (en réponse à la lettre du Conseil 2009-02-04) | 2009-02-09 |
Renseignements devant être soumis en réponse à une décision | 2009-02-09 |
Observations et demande de comparution | 2009-02-23 (révisée) |
Questions supplémentaires (aucunes questions) | 2009-03-02 |
Répliques aux observations | 2009-04-30 |
Répliques finales aux observations | 2009-07-28 (révisée) |
Section 1 - Documents
du Conseil
a) Avis public, Décisions, etc.
b) Liste
des parties intéressées
c) Correspondance aux parties
d) Demandes de renseignements
Section 2 - Documents
de Bell Aliant Communications régionales, société en commandite, Bell Canada,
Cogeco Cable Canada Inc., MTS Allstream Inc., Rogers Cable
Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Primus Telecommunications
Canada Inc., Shaw Communications Inc., Barrett Xplore Inc., la Société TELUS
Communications, Vidéotron ltée, Bragg Communications Inc. (faisant affaires
sous le nom d'EastLink), la Coalition of Internet Service Providers
(CISP) et CAIP
a) Correspondance au Conseil
b) Observations
c) Répliques aux observations et répliques finales
d) Demandes de divulgation
e) Réponses aux demandes de divulgation (voir section
5)
Section 4 - Documents
des parties
a) Correspondance au Conseil
b) Observations
c) Répliques aux observations et répliques finales
d) Demandes de divulgation
e) Réponses aux demandes de divulgation (voir section
5)
Section 5 - Réponses aux demandes de renseignements
Section 6) - Pièces et répliques aux questions soulevées lors de l'audience publique
Section 7 - Transcriptions
Section 8 - Documents
divers
a) Frais
b) Autres
Section 1a) Avis public, Décision, etc.
2010-02-12 - Ordonnance de télécom CRTC 2010-85 Demande d'adjudication de frais concernant la participation de certaines parties à l'instance amorcée par l'avis public de télécom 2008‑19.
Numéros de dossiers : 8646-C12-200815400, 4754-356, 4754-357, 4754-358 et 4754-359
2009-12-10 - Ordonnance de télécom CRTC
2009-765 Demande d'adjudication de frais concernant la participation de Jason Roks à l'instance amorcée par l'avis public de télécom 2008-19
Numéros de dossiers : 8646-C12-200815400 et 4754-361
2009-12-10 - Ordonnance de télécom CRTC 2009-764 Demande d'adjudication de frais concernant la participation de l'Association des Sourds du Canada à l'instance amorcée par l'avis public de télécom 2008-19
Numéros de dossiers : 8646-C12-200815400 et 4754-355
2009-10-21 - Politique réglementaire de télécom CRTC 2009-657 Examen des pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs de services Internet
Numéro de dossier : 8646-C12-200815400
2009-07-16 - Avis
public de télécom CRTC 2008-19-4
Examen des pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs
de service Internet
Changements apportés à la procédure
Numéro de dossier : 8646-C12-200815400
2009-03-18 - Avis
public de télécom CRTC 2008-19-3
Examen des pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs
de services Internet
Ajout à la procédure
Numéro de dossier : 8646-C12-200815400
2009-02-12 - Avis
public de télécom CRTC 2008-19-2
Examen des pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs
de services Internet
Changements apportés à la procédure
Référence : 8646-C12-200815400
2009-02-11 - Avis
public de télécom CRTC 2008-19-1
Examen des pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs
de services Internet
Disponibilité des documents connexes
Référence : 8646-C12-200815400
Section 1c) Correspondance aux parties
2011-04-29 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à Barrett Xplore Inc. - Objet : Suivi de la politique réglementaire de télécom 2009-657
2010-02-05 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. - Objet : Suivi de la Politique réglementaire de télécom 2009-657
2010-01-22 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à Shaw Communications Inc. - Objet : Suivi de la Politique réglementaire de télécom 2009-657
2010-01-22 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à Rogers Communications Inc. - Objet : Suivi de la Politique réglementaire de télécom 2009-657
2010-01-22 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à Bell Canada - Objet : Suivi de la Politique réglementaire de télécom 2009-657
2010-01-22 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. - Objet : Suivi de la Politique réglementaire de télécom 2009-657
2010-01-22 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à Bragg Communications Incorporated - Objet : Suivi de la Politique réglementaire de télécom 2009-657
2010-01-22 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à Barrett Xplore Inc. - Objet : Suivi de la Politique réglementaire de télécom 2009-657
2009-09-16 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée aux Parties
liées à l'Avis public de télécom CRTC 2008-19
- Objet: Avis public de télécom CRTC 2008-19 intitulé
Examen des pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs
de services Internet (l'avis 2008-19) – Demande de
prolongation de la date limite pour déposer des observations
concernant les réclamations de frais
2009-07-27 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée aux Parties
intéressées à l'AP 2008-19
- Objet : Examen des pratiques des fournisseurs de services Internet
concernant la gestion du trafic – Avis public de télécom
CRTC 2008-19 (AP 2008-19)
2009-06-05 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée aux parties comparantes à
l'AP 2008-19
- Objet: Examen des pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs
de services Internet
2009-02-12 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée aux Parties
intéressées à l'AP 2008-19
- Objet: Examen des pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs
de services Internet
2009-02-11 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée aux Parties
intéressées à l'AP 2008-19
- Objet: Examen des pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs
de services Internet
2009-02-11 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée aux Parties
intéressées à l'AP 2008-19
- Objet: Examen des pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs
de services Internet
2009-02-06 - Lettre
du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Description: Lettre adressée à Barret Xplore Inc. (BXI) - Objet: Examen
des pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs de services
Internet
2009-02-04 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à la Liste
de parties intéressées à l'avis 2008-19
- Objet: Examen des pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs
de services Internet
Section 1d) Demandes de renseignements
2008-12-04 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à la Liste de distribution - Objet: Avis
public de télécom CRTC 2008-19
- Examen des pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs
de services Internet - Demandes de renseignements
Section 2a) Correspondance au Conseil
2021-11-03 - Vidéotron ltée (Vidéotron)
Description : Québecor Média inc., au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron, soumet, par la présente, la nouvelle page tarifaire 32C de son Tarif général CRTC 26950. La publication de cette page sert à mettre à jour la liste des niveaux d’accès auxquels Vidéotron applique une pratique de gestion du trafic internet. La pratique de gestion utilisée par Vidéotron et les circonstances de son utilisation ne sont aucunement modifiées.
Document : 4114647.zip - 164 Ko
2019-04-10 - Vidéotron ltée (Vidéotron)
Description : Québecor Média inc., au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron, soumet, par la présente, la nouvelle page tarifaire 32C de son Tarif général CRTC 26950. La publication de cette page sert à mettre à jour la liste des niveaux d’accès auxquels Vidéotron applique une pratique de gestion du trafic internet. La pratique de gestion utilisée par Vidéotron et les circonstances de son utilisation ne sont aucunement modifiées.
Document : 3627747.zip - 95 Ko
2019-02-06 - Vidéotron ltée (Vidéotron)
Description : Québecor Média inc., au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron, soumet, par la présente, la nouvelle page tarifaire 32C de son Tarif général CRTC 26950. La publication de cette page sert à mettre à jour la liste des niveaux d’accès auxquels Vidéotron applique une pratique de gestion du trafic internet. La pratique de gestion utilisée par Vidéotron et les circonstances de son utilisation ne sont aucunement modifiées.
Document : 3588206.zip - 95 Ko
2018-11-01 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description:
Pursuant to paragraphs 91 and 92 of Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2009-657; Review of Internet traffic management practices of Internet service providers (TRP 2009-657), Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) is issuing revised tariffed pages for its Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) Tariff 26300 to reflect an updated description of the technical Internet traffic management practices (ITMPs) on Shaw’s network.
Document:3233303.zip - 202 KB
2017-02-27 - Quebecor
Media Inc.
Description: Québecor Média inc., au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron, soumet, par la présente, les nouvelles pages tarifaires 32C et 32D de son Tarif général CRTC 26950. La publication de ces pages sert à mettre à jour la liste des niveaux d’accès auxquels Vidéotron applique une pratique de gestion du trafic Internet. La pratique de gestion utilisée par Vidéotron et les circonstances de son utilisation ne sont aucunement modifiées.
Document: 27022017.zip - 137KO
2010-02-26 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) is in receipt of the Commission staff 5 February 2010 letter
requesting Cogeco to address concerns regarding the disclosure requirements of the
technical Internet traffic management practices (ITMPs) applied by Cogeco to its retail Internet services.
Document: 1364334.pdf - 17KO
2009-07-27 - Bell
Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
(the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
(Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively,
the Companies) are in receipt of a letter from CAIP et al. dated 24
July 2009.
Document: 1249131.zip - 58KO
2009-07-24 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups, Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP), Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., Cybersurf Corp., eagle.ca, Execuling Telecom Inc., Managed Network Systems Inc., Skyway West Business Internet Services, Start Communications, TekSavvy Solutions Inc., Vianet Inernet Solutions and Yak Communications Inc. (the Applicants)
Description: On 21 May 2009, the undersigned filed the above-referenced application to review and vary Telecom Decision 2008-108.
Document: 1248477.pdf - 387KO
2009-07-14 - Bell
Canada
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1242402.doc
- 417KO
2009-07-13 - Rogers
Cable Communications
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1242429.doc
- 57KO
2009-07-13 - Quebecor Media Inc.
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1242408.doc - 51KO
2009-07-10 - Barrett
Xplore
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1242497.doc
- 56KO
2009-07-10 - Cogeco
Cable Inc.
Description: Oral presentation - Speaking notes for Cogeco Cable Canada
Inc.
Document: 1241707.doc
- 194KO
2009-07-10 - TELUS Communications
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1241706.doc
- 828KO
2009-07-09 - Primus
Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Oral presidentation
Description: 1241705.pdf
- 4482KO
2009-07-09 - Canadian
Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1241701.pdf - 4341KO
2009-07-08 - MTS Allstream
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1241699.pdf - 3883KO
2009-02-24 - Cogeco
Cable Inc. on behalf of Cogeco Cable Canada Inc.
Description: In its submission filed yesterday, Cogeco Cable Inc.
on behalf of Cogeco Cable Canada inadvertently neglected to indicate
that it wishes to make an oral presentation at the public hearing in
this proceeding, as provided for in paragraph 22 of the Telecom Public
Notice 2008-19.
Document: 1030674.pdf
- 17KO
2009-02-24 - Bell
Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
(the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in PN 2008-19, Bell
Aliant Regional Communi ca tions, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
(collectively, the Companies) filed their initial comments yesterday
but inadvertently neglected to request to appear during the oral public
hearing held by the Commission in the above-mentioned proceeding.
Document: 1030628.doc
- 58KO
2009-02-24 - Bell
Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
(the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communi ca tions, Limited Partnership
and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) note that the Commission
has not, in the above-mentioned proceeding, invited parties to submit
a final reply after the oral proceeding scheduled to begin on 6 July
2009 and expected to last no more than four business days
Document: 1030626.doc
- 58KO
2009-02-24 - MTS
Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures specified at paragraph
22 of Telecom Public Notice 2008-19, MTS Allstream requests the opportunity
to make an oral presentation at the public hearing in this matter.
Document: 1030601.pdf
- 51KO
2009-02-24 - TELUS
Communications Company
Description: In its initial comments filed yesterday, TELUS inadvertently
neglected to indicate that it wishes to make an oral presentation at
the public hearing in this proceeding, as provided for in paragraph
22 of the Public Notice.
Document: 1029881.pdf
- 15KO
2009-02-23 - Quebecor
Media Inc. (QMI) pour Vidéotron ltée
Description: Conformément aux procédures énoncées au paragraphe
22 de l'AP 2008-19 (tel que modifié par les AP 2008-19-1 et 2),
QMI, au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron ltée (Vidéotron), signifie par la
présente son intention de faire une présentation orale lors de la consultation
publique prévue par le Conseil
Document: 1029684.doc
- 144KO
2009-02-11 - Canadian
Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: The Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
is in receipt of letter from the Consumer Groups represented by PIAC,
the Campaign for Democratic Media represented by CIPPIC, and CFPTA requesting
an extension for all parties to file initial Comments in the above-noted
proceeding.
Document: 1022593.pdf
- 529KO
2009-01-13 - Canadian
Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: The Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) has
reviewed the responses to interrogatories posed by the Commission in
the above noted Public Notice. CAIP has grave concerns about the volume
of information being filed in confidence by the respondents.
Document: 1009914.pdf
- 594KO
2009-02-23 - Coalition
of Internet Service Providers Inc.(CISP)
Description: Please find in the attachment, the initial comments
of the Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP) in the matters
set forth above
Document: 1029835.zip
- 1345KO
2009-02-23 - Bell
Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
(the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in PN 2008-19,
the following are the comments of Bell Aliant Regional Communi ca tions,
Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies).
Document: 1029804.zip
- 1815KO
2009-02-23 - Primus
Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Telecom Public
Notice CRTC 2008-19, as revised by the Commission's letter dated
12 February 2009, Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus) hereby
files its initial comments
Document: 1029757.doc
- 161KO
2009-02-23 - MTS
Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures specified at paragraph
14 of Telecom Public Notice 2008-19, MTS Allstream submits the attached
comments.
Document: 1029944.zip
- 711KO
2009-02-23 - Barrett
Xplore Inc. (BXI)
Description: This submission is filed by Barrett Xplore in response
to Telecom Public Notice 2008-19 issued by the CRTC.
Document: 1029720.pdf
- 54KO
2009-02-23 - Cogeco
Cable Inc. on behalf of Cogeco Cable Canada Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 21 of telecom Public Notice
2008-19, as amended in the Commission 11 February 2009 letter, Cogeco
Cable Inc. herebysubmit on behalf of Cogeco Cable Canada its submission.
Document: 1029682.pdf
- 160KO
2009-02-23 - Rogers
Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission for
this proceeding, Rogers Communications Inc. is filing herewith through
e-pass its Comments.
Document: 1029665.zip
- 112KO
2009-02-23 - TELUS
Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedure set out in the above-noted
public notice, attached are the comments of TELUS Communications Company.
Document: 1029656.pdf
- 109KO
2009-02-23 - Shaw
Communications Inc.
Description: These comments are filed by Shaw in accordance with
paragraph 21 of Telecom Public Notice 2008-19, in which the Commission
initiated a public proceeding to consider Internet traffic management
practices for both wholesale and retail internet services.
Document: 1029651.pdf
- 109KO
2009-02-23 - Quebecor
Media Inc. (QMI) pour Vidéotron ltée
Description: Conformément aux procédures énoncées dans l'AP
2008-19 (tel que modifié par les AP 2008-19-1 et 2), QMI, au nom de
sa filiale Vidéotron ltée (« Vidéotron »), dépose ci-joint
ses observations initiales sur les enjeux soulevés dans cette instance
Document: 1029634.zip
- 113KO
2009-02-23 - Canadian
Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: The attached Comments are being filed with the Commission
in the proceeding conducted pursuant to TPN 2008-19 on behalf of the
Canadian Association of Internet Providers.
Document: 1029513.zip
- 475KO
2009-02-23 - Bragg
Communications Inc. (EastLink)
Description: Please find enclosed a copy of the submission filed
by Bragg Communications inc., carrying on business as EastLink on today's
date.
Document: 1029406.zip
- 208KO
Section 2c) Répliques aux observations et répliques finales
2009-08-01 - Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)
Description: Find enclosed in the attachment, the final replies of CISP to matters raised in the initial written and/or oral submissions.
Document: 1251629.zip - 26KO
2009-07-28 - Canadian
Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: The attached Final Reply is being filed
with the Commission in the proceeding conducted pursuant to TPN 2008-19
by the Canadian Associationa of Internet Providers.
Document:
1249495.zip - 628KO
2009-07-28 - MTS Allstream
Inc.
Description: In accordance with Telecom Public Notice
2008-19, attached are the reply comments of MTS Allstream Inc.
Document:
1249456.pdf - 105KO
2009-07-28 - TELUS
Communications Company
Description: These final reply comments are filed by TELUS
Communications Company pursuant to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-19-4,
Review of the Internet traffic management practices of Internet service
providers
Document:
1249453.pdf - 119KO
2009-07-28 - Shaw
Communications Inc.
Description: These final reply comments are filed by Shaw Communications
in accordance with paragraph 2 of Telecom Public Notice 2008-19-3.
Document:
1249449.pdf - 56KO
2009-07-28 - Rogers
Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the
Commission for this proceeding, Telecom Public Notice 2008-19, Rogers
is filing herewith via e-pass its final argument in the attached document.
Document:
1249443.zip - 220KO
2009-07-28 - Bell
Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
(the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures
established in PN 2008-19-4, the following is the final reply of Bell
Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
(collectively, the Companies)
Document:
1249434.zip - 346KO
2009-07-28 - Cogeco
Cable Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 2 of Telecom
Public Notice 2008-19-4, dated 18 March 2009, Cogeco Cable Inc. hereby
submits on behalf of its subsidiary Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. its final
reply comments.
Document:
1249419.pdf - 134KO
2009-07-28 - Quebecor
Media inc. (QMI) pour Vidéotron ltée
Description: Conformément aux procédures énoncées dans l'AP
2008-19, QMI, au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron, dépose ci-joint sa réplique
finale sur les enjeux soulevés dans cette instance.
Document:
1249412.pdf - 49KO
2009-07-28 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the above-noted proceeding, Primus hereby submits its final reply comments.
Document: 1249395.zip - 167KO
2009-04-30 - Primus
Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Telecom
Public Notice CRTC 2008-19, Review of the Internet traffic management
practices of Internet service providers (“PN 2008-19”),
Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) hereby
files its reply comments.
Document: 1110635.pdf
- 581KO
2009-04-30 - Cogeco
Cable Inc. on behalf of Cogeco Cable Canada Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 29 of Telecom Public Notice
CRTC 2008-19, Review of the Internet traffic management practices of
Internet service providers, as amended in
the Commission 11 February 2009 letter, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby
submits
on behalf of its subsidiary Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. its reply comments.
Document: 1110488.pdf
- 265KO
2009-04-30 - Bell
Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
(the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in PN 2008-19,
the following are the reply comments of Bell Aliant Regional Communications,
Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies).
Document: 1110455.zip
- 118KO
2009-04-30 - TELUS
Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedure set out in the
above-noted public notice,
attached are the reply comments of TELUS Communications Company
(“TELUS”).
Document: 1110432.pdf
- 84KO
2009-04-30 - Rogers
Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) is filing these reply
comments in accordance with the procedures established by the Commission
in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1110392.pdf
- 168KO
2009-04-30 - Barrett
Xplore Inc. (BXI)
Description: Barrett Xplore Inc. (“BXI”) is hereby filing
its reply to comments submitted in the
above referenced proceeding.
Document: 1110376.pdf
- 62KO
2009-04-30 - MTS Allstream
Inc.
Description: In accordance with Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-19,
Review of the internet traffic management practices of internet service
providers, attached are the reply comments of MTS Allstream Inc.
Document: 1109931.pdf
- 211KO
2009-04-30 - Shaw
Communications Inc. (Shaw)
Description: These reply comments are filed by Shaw Communications Inc.
(Shaw) in accordance with paragraph 29 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC
2008-19 Review of the Internet traffic management practices of Internet
service providers (the Public Notice).
Document: 1109885.pdf
- 66KO
2009-04-30 - Quebecor
Media Inc. (QMI) pour Vidéotron ltée
Description: Conformément aux procédures énoncées
dans l'AP 2008-19 (tel que modifié par les AP 2008-19-1, 2 et
3), QMI au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron ltée (Vidéotron),
dépose ci-joint sa réplique aux observations initiales
sur les enjeux soulevés dans cette instance.
Document: 1109860.pdf
- 114KO
2009-04-30 - Saskatchewan
Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure established at paragraph 29 of
Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-19, Review of the Internet traffic management
practices of Internet service providers , Saskatchewan Telecommunications
(SaskTel) is filing the attached Reply Comments.
Document: 1109749.zip
- 70KO
2009-04-30 - Canadian
Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: The attached Reply Comments are being filed with the Commission
in the proceeding conducted pursuant to TPN 2008-19 on behalf of the
Canadian Association of Internet Providers.
Document: 1109132.zip
- 361KO
Section 2d) Demandes de divulgation
Aucun document
Section 2e) Réponses aux demandes de divulgation
(voir section 5)
Section 4a) Correspondance au Conseil
2009-07-28 - Jean-François
Mezei
Description: I
am in receipt of the Commission's letter dated July 27th 2009 in which
the Commission refuses the many requests for an extension to the July
28th deadline.
Document: 1249466.doc
- 23KO
2009-07-13 - Union
des consommateurs
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1242404.pdf
- 430KO
2009-07-09 - CIPPIC/Campaign
for Democratic Media
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1241703.pdf
- 4510KO
2009-07-09 - Execulink
Telecom
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1241704.pdf
- 3304KO
2009-07-08 - CFTPA
and Independent Film and Television Alliance
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1241693.pdf
- 5257KO
2009-07-08 - ARCH
Description: Oral Presentataion
Document: 1241696.pdf - 3280KO
2009-07-08 - ACTRA
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1241697.doc
- 75KO
2009-07-07 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1241692.pdf - 1900KO
2009-07-07 - Open Internet Coalition
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1241691.doc -102KO
2009-07-06 - Sandvine Incorporated
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1241688.doc - 134KO
2009-07-06 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description: Oral Presentation
Document: 1241689.pdf - 206KO
2009-04-27 - Execulink
Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (Execulink) filed a request on 24
April 2009 to extend
the Deadline for Reply Comments for TPN 2008-19-3.
Document: 1102627.pdf
- 20KO
2009-04-24 - Execulink
Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (Execulink) filed Comments for this
proceeding on the due date, 23 February 2009. A copy of the Comments
and the Commission verification email are attached.
Document: 1098003.zip
- 103KO
2009-03-02 - Execulink
Telecom Inc.
Description: A part of the submission filed on 23 February 2009
Execulink Telecom Inc. inadvertently neglected to request participation
in the Public Hearing for this proceeding.
Document: 1034516.pdf
- 21KO
2009-02-10 - CFTPA
Description: The CFTPA is in receipt of the Consumer Groups'
request for an extension for all parties to file Comments in the above-noted
proceeding from Monday, 16 February 2009 to Friday, 20 February 2009.
Document: 1022221.pdf
- 47KO
2009-02-10 - Canadian
Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC)
Description: CIPPIC, on behalf of its client, the Campaign for
Democratic media, writes in support of the Consumer Coalition's
request for an extension for all parties to file Comments in PN 2008-19
from Monday, 16 February 2009 to Friday, 20 February 2009.
Document: 1022206.pdf
- 521KO
2009-02-10 - Goodmans
for Open Internet Coalition (OIC)
Description: We are informed b PIAC that it is seeking from the Commission
an extension of four days for all parties to file their initial comments
in respect to PN 2008-19, i.e. to February 20, 2009.
Document: 1022163.pdf
- 36KO
2009-02-10 - Public
Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Consumer Groups hereby request an extension for
all parties to file comments in the above-noted proceeding from Monday,
16 February 2009 to Friday, 20 February 2009.
Document: 1022102.pdf
- 162KO
2009-01-06 - British
Columbia Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA)
Description: The British Columbia Civil Liberties Association
(BCCLA) would like to make a written submission to review of internet
traffic management practices. The BCCLA made a submission in Telecom
Decision 2008-108 dealing with Bell Canada's practice of throttling
P2P traffic at certain times of the day. We are particularly interested
in making a submission to the Commission on item 9(5) in the Call for
Comments. We anticipate making submissions on the interpretation of
Section 36 of the Act, in light of constitutionally protected rights
to expressive freedom.
Document: 1001248.htm
- 3KO
Observations reçues électroniquement
Plusieurs pétitions de letters totalisant 11,247 signatures
2009-02-24 - B.C.
Civil Liberties Association
Description: Enclosed please find the submissions of the B.C.
Civil Liberties Association concerning the above-noted review.
Document: 1032538.pdf
- 636KO
2009-02-24 - Public
Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel
for Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty
Organization and Option consommateurs (the Consumer Groups) has been
made aware that it inadvertently forgot to include the curriculum vitae
of our expert, Dr. Barbara Cherry in its Comments package filed with
the Commission yesterday.
Document: 1030618.zip
- 355KO
2009-02-23 - Kurt
Dobbins on behalf of Arbor Networks, Inc. (Arbor)
Description: The Commission invites parties to comment on Internet Traffic
management practices of ISPs, including in particular the issues described
below.
Document: 1032115.pdf
- 486KO
2009-02-23 - Information
Technology Association of Canada (ITAC)
Description: ITAC is therefore pleased to have the opportunity
to contribute to the Commission's studyof the management of internet
traffic by internet service providers (ISPs).
Document: 1032113.pdf
- 136KO
2009-02-23 - Independent
Film & Television Alliance (IFTA)
Description: Attached please find the submission of the Independent
Film & Television Alliance (IFTA) in connection with the above-noted
proceeding.
Document: 1032007.doc
- 192KO
2009-02-23 - Alliance
of Canadian Cinema, Television and Radio Artists (ACTRA)
Description: This is the submissin of the Alliance of Canadian Cinema,
Television and Radio Artists (ACTRA) in the matter of Telecom Public
Notice 2008-19.
Document: 1031363.pdf
- 106KO
2009-02-23 - Canadian
Media Guild (CMG)
Description: The CMG supports the comments made by the Campaign for
Democratic Media on this proceeding and also supports comments made
by members of the broad-based Save our Net coalition.
Document: 1031064.pdf
- 69KO
2009-02-23 - Public
Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel
for Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty
Organizatino and Option consommateurs (the Consumer Groups) is pleeased
to enclose its Comments in the above matter.
Document: 1030499.zip
- 11466KO
2009-02-23 - Canadian
Independent Record Production Association (CIRPA)
Description: CIRPA is of the view that the issue of Internet traffic
management is an integral part of the same overall discussion that occurred
recently in the February 18 th CRTC Hearing on new media (2008-11),
when it comes to the future of regulation and as it pertains to broadcast
and telecommunications services in Canada.
Document: 1030341.doc
- 250KO
2009-02-23 - Skype
Communications s.a.r.l.
Description: The issues raised by the Commission in this proceeding
are critical to ensuring that the Internet remains a vital component
of today,s global information economy.
Document: 1030330.doc
- 105KO
2009-02-23 - Association
québécoise de l'industrie du disque, du spectacle et de la vidéo
(ADISQ)
Description: L'ADISQ désire par la présente soumettre les
commentaires suivants à l'égard de l'avis public énoncé plus
haut relatif à l'examen des pratiques de gestion de trafic des fournisseurs
de services Internet.
Document: 1030313.pdf
- 32KO
2009-02-23 - CBC/Radio-Canada
Description: In Telecom Public Notice 2008-19, 20 November 2008, the
Commission invited submissinos from interested parties on a range of
issues relating to the management of Internet traffic by Internet service
Providers (ISPs).
Document: 1030285.pdf
- 69KO
2009-02-23 - Canadian
Conference of the Arts
Description: The Canadian Conference of the Arts is the oldest
and largest umbrella arts and culture organization in Canada.
Document: 1030237.doc
- 143KO
2009-02-23 - Network
BC for Government of the Province of British Columbia
Description: Network BC, on behalf of the Government of the Province
of British Columbia, hereby submits its comments with respect to Public
Notice 2008-19.
Document: 1030213.zip
- 753KO
2009-02-23 - Documentary
Organization of Canada (DOC)
Description: Independent documentary filmmakers across Caanda
thank you for the opportunity to submit these comments on the Internet
traffic management practices of Internet service providers (ISPs).
Document: 1030141.pdf
- 179KO
2009-02-23 - Canadian
Film and Television Production Association (CFTPA)
Description: Please find attached the Canadian Film and Television
Production Association's initial comments in respect of the above-named
proceeding.
Document: 1030120.pdf
- 349KO
2009-02-23 - Canadian
Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC)
Description: Please find attached Comments pursuant to the above-mentioned
proceeding, filed on behalf of the Campaign for Democratic Media, pursuant
to the procedure set out in the above-captioned Public Notice as amended
by the Commission's communications of February 11, 2009.
Document: 1029987.zip
- 1991KO
2009-02-23 - Council
of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) and ARCH Disability Law Centre
Description: On behalf of the Council of Canadians with Disabilities
(CCD) and ARCH Disability Law Centre ( ARCH ), I am pleased to submit
the enclosed Comments
Document: 1029920.zip
- 123KO
2009-02-23 - Vaxination
Informatique
Description: Please find enclosed my comments which should contriute
to the discussion due to my different viewpoint as a technologies and
industry observer.
Document: 1029877.pdf
- 70KO
2009-02-23 - Cybersurf
Corp.
Description: Cybersurf is pleased to be given the opportunity
to participate in the Commission's Public Consultation. As IP Networks
and applications for those networks develop Cybersurf believes the Commission's
timing and approach is appropriate
Document: 1029865.doc
- 81KO
2009-02-23 - Score
Media Inc.
Description: As the parent company to The Score Television Network,
a national sports, news and information specialty service which reaches
a significant and increasing number of sports fans over the Internet,
Score Media Inc. is pleased to submit these written comments in response
to the Public Notice.
Document: 1029790.pdf
- 385KO
2009-02-23 - Distributel
Communications Ltd.
Description: In accordance with the procedure set out in Telecom
Public Notice 2008-19, Distributel is submitting the following comments.
Document: 1029768.pdf
- 58KO
2009-02-23 - Open
Internet Coalition
Description: The Internet supercharges and combines the power
of free speech and free markets, producing the greatest engine of democratic
deliberation and open commerce since the introduction of the moveable-type
press.
Document: 1029708.pdf
- 361KO
2009-02-23 - Execulink
Telecom Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the schedule for this matter set out
in the Commission's Public Notice dated 20 November 2009 and modified
on 12 February 2009, Execulink Telecom Inc. hereby submits its initial
comments with respect to the Internet traffic mangement practices.
Document: 1029702.pdf
- 92KO
2009-02-23 - Sandvine
Incorporated
Description: Attached are Sandvine's responses in connection
with a Call fo Comments pursuant to Telecom Public Notice 2008-19.
Document: 1029527.pdf
- 4262KO
2009-02-23 - Pelmorex
Media Inc.
Description: Pelmorex is pleased to provide comments in response
to the above-noted public consultation, which seeks input on the Internet
traffic management practices of internet service providers (ISPs).
Document: 1029399.pdf
- 76KO
2009-02-23 - Union
des consommateurs
Description: La présente fait état des observations faites par l'Union
des consommateurs.
Document: 1029374.zip
- 811KO
2009-02-23 - RipNET
Limited
Description: This submission is filed by RipNET Limited (RipNET), an
independent Internet Service Provider (ISP) based in Brockville, Ontario,
in response to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-19, 20 November, 2008
Document: 1029359.doc
- 864KO
2009-02-23 - Canadian
Interactive Alliance/Alliance interactive canadienne (CIAIC)
Description: The Canadian Interactive Alliance/Alliance interactive
canadienne (CIAIC) is delighted to have the opportunity to provide input
on the aforementioned matter.
Document: 1029246.pdf
- 196KO
2009-02-19 - Juniper
Network, Inc.
Description: It is with pleasure that Juniper Networks responds
to the Call for Comments of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-19.
Document: 1029277.doc
- 365KO
2009-02-18 - Privacy
Commissioner of Canada/Commissaire à la protection de la vie privée
du Canada
Description: On 20 November 2008, the CRTC initiated a public
proceeding to consider Internet traffic management practices for both
wholesale and retail Internet service.
Document: 1027577.pdf_eng
- 543KO - 1027589.pdf_fra
- 644KO
2009-02-12 - Atlantic
Provinces Library Association
Description: I want to take this opportunity to share with you
the growing concerns of the Atlantic Provinces Library Association (APLA),
as well as many Canadians, regarding net neutrality and the Internet.
Document: 1030220.pdf
- 43KO
2009-02-11 - Multi-Tech
Systems
Description: I currently own and operate a small computer store
in Creston, B.C. and have several comments from myself and my customers
in resgards to net neutrality and how the removal of it affects both
personal and business users.
Document: 1025870.pdf
- 69KO
2009-02-10 - Canadian
Music Publishers Association
Description: On behalf of the Canadian Music Publishers Association,
we would like to make the following observations and comments regarding
the questions outlined in the above mentioned public notice.
Document: 1024522.pdf
- 84KO
2009-01-22 - Participatory
Culture Foundation
Description: The Participatory Culture Foundation appreciates
the opportunity to provide comments to the CRTC on the questions set
out in Publci Notice 2008-19.
Document: 1030188.pdf
- 665KO
2009-01-16 - Canadian
Association of the Deaf (CAD)
Description: The Canadian Association of the Deaf (CAD) is a national
organization that undertakes research, educational, advocacy and support
activities on behalf of Deaf persons and other Canadians with similar
needs and interests.
Document: 1008694.doc
- 31KO
2008-12-12 - Zip.ca
Description: Zip.ca welcomes the opportunity to provide these
comments regarding the above noted review of Internet traffic management
practices of Internet service providers. We would also like to register
our request to appear before the Commission during the consultation
phase.
Document: 999115.doc
- 35KO
2008-12-03 - National
Union of Public and General Employees
Description: I am writing you on behalf of the National Union
of Public and General Employees, one of Canada's largest trade unions,
to request the opportunity to present at the CRTC's July 6, 2009
public hearing to examine the current and potential traffic management
practices of ISPs operating in Canada. Our focus will be on the
impact of such practices on end-users.
Document: 984612.pdf
- 1461KO
2008-12-01 - BBBritain.co.uk
Description: BBBritain.co.uk represents avid UK Broadband users keen
to get the most from our connectivity. We acknowledge the need to manage
congestion at peak periods. We believe the issues raised by CRTC in
this
consultation and the manner in which they are resolved will impact all
users. We have outlined our perspective in the hope you will take
account of users views and the knowledge that your conclusions will
be
read and possibly copied by other regulators around the world.
Document: 987313.pdf
- 149KO
Section 4c) Répliques aux observations et répliques finales
2009-08-10 - Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada
Description: Vous trouverez ci-joint la réplique finale du Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada en réponse à l'avis public de Télécom CRTC 2009-19.
Document: 1253905.pdf - 337KO
2009-07-28 - Bray,
Korey
Description: After listening to the public hearing and statements made
by the many people and groups speaking before the CRTC, I would just
like to give my final comments to the CRTC on the traffic management
issue.
Document: 1250275.htm
- 3KO
2009-07-28 - Freeman, Wesley
Description: Having listened to the entire process, I see no evidence
of competition in the Canadian Marketplace. Bell Canada has done all
they can to circumvent the ruling of the commission to share last mile.
The provisions for shared last mile were not put in place so that Bell
Canada could neglect the last mile.
Document: 1250276.htm
- 4KO
2009-07-28 - McKee, Jeff
Description: Many times during the CRTC hearings I heard ISPs mention
that Bittorrent isn't time sensitive but that's not true. Here are a
list of programs that use bittorrent for time sensitive applications.
Document: 1250277.htm
- 5KO
2009-07-28 - Roks, Jason
Description: I appreciate the opportunity to submit my final comments on the testimony and submissions regarding the CRTC's Internet Traffic Management Practices (ITMP) hearings. This hearing is also often referred to as the Net Neutrality Hearing because for many this principle is clearly the heart of this issue. As such, I recognize this hearing as a pivotal moment for Canada's Internet with significant and long term implications.
Document: 1250495.doc - 63KO
2009-07-28 - BitTorrent, Inc.
Description: BitTorrent, Inc. (‘BitTorrent”) has been monitoring with interest the proceeding initiated by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (“Commission” or “CRTC”) in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-19, Review of the Internet Traffic Management Practices of Internet Service Providers (“PN 2008-19”). As in the United States, the proceeding on traffic management policy has sparked an intense and lively debate.
Document: 1249945.pdf - 140KO
2009-07-28 - Council of
Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) and ARCH Disability Law Centre
Description: On behalf of the Council of Canadians with Disabilities
(CCD) and ARCH Disability Law Centre (ARCH), please find attached the
Final Reply in this matter
Document: 1249754.zip
- 25KO
2009-07-28 - Office of
the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Description: Please find enclosed the Final Reply submission
from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada's in response
to Public Notice 2008-19.
Document:
1249696.pdf - 292KO
2009-07-28 - Canadian Internet
Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) for Campaign for Democratic
Media
Description: Please find attached Comments pursuant to the
above-mentioned proceeding, filed on behalf of the Campaign for Democratic
Media, pursuant to the procedures set out in the above-captioned Public
Notice
Document:
1249686.zip - 346KO
2009-07-28 - Canadian Film
and Television Production Association (CFTPA)
Description: Please find attached the Canadian Film and Television
Production Association's final comments in respect to the above-named
proceeding.
Document:
1249673.pdf - 266KO
2009-07-28 - Open Internet
Coalition (OIC)
Description: In accordance with the procedure outlined in
the aforementioned public notice, attached are the final reply comments
of the Open Internet Coalition
Document:
1249669.pdf - 215KO
2009-07-28 - CBC/Radio-Canada
Description: In accordance with the procedures established
by Telecom Public Notice 2008-19, 20 November 2008, CBC/Radio-Canada
is pleased to provide the Commission with these Final Comments.
Document:
1249667.pdf - 93KO
2009-07-28 - Juniper Networks
Description: Juniper Networks understands the Commission desire
to establish reasonable and effective guidelines surrounding Internet
traffic management paractices, and to this end, we have submitted the
final response.
Document:
1249635.pdf - 57KO
2009-07-28 - Pelmorex Media
Inc.
Description: Pelmorex is pleased to provide these final reply comments
in respect of the above-referenced consultation on the Internet traffic
management practices on Internet servcie providers (ISPs).
Document:
1249626.pdf - 40KO
2009-07-28 - Canadian Association
of the Deaf (CAD)
Description: Final Comments of the Canadian Association of
the Deaf
Document:
1249615.doc - 33KO
2009-07-28 - Vaxination
Informatique
Description: Vaxination Informatique provides its last comments
on the 2008-19 public notice which include a 10 page main document and
2 PDF attachements.
Document:
1249532.zip - 520KO
2009-07-28 - Barrett Xplore
Inc. and Barrett Broadband Networks Inc.
Description: Barrett Xplore Inc. and Barrett Broadband Networks
Inc. believe that they have adequately addressed in their written and
oral comments all of the issues raisedby the other interested parties
in this proceeding.
Document:
1249522.pdf - 44KO
2009-07-28 - RipNET Limited
Description: These final reply comments are filed by RipNET Limited,
an independent Internet Service Providers (ISP) based in Brockville,
Ontario, in response to Telecom Public Notice 2008-19, 20 November 2008.
Document:
1249516.pdf - 1516KO
2009-07-28 - Execulink
Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink Telecom is in receipt of Comments,
Reply Comments an Oral Comments with respect to Internet Traffic Management
Practices, This is Execulink's Final Reply.
Document:
1249506.pdf - 93KO
2009-07-28 - Union des
Consommateurs
Description: La présente fait état des répliques finales par Union
dse consommateurs, un organisme à but non lucratif qui regroupe des
associations coopératives d'économie familiale (ACEF), l'Association
des consommateurs pour la qualité dans la construction (ACQC) ainsi
que des membres individuels, dans le cadre de l'Avis public 2008-19.
Description:
1249482.zip - 428KO
2009-07-28 - Sandvine
Incorporated ULC
Description: Attached, please find Sandvine's Final
Reply in connection with Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-19, Review
of Internet Traffic Management Practices of Internet Service Providers.
Document:
1249474.zip - 166KO
2009-07-28 - Public
Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC),
as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty
Organization and Option consommateur (the Consumer Groups) is pleased
to enclose its Written Reply Comments and Consumer Groups' Undertakings
in the above matter.
Document:
1249459.zip - 56KO
2009-07-28 - Score
Media Inc.
Description: Score Media Inc.is pleased to file this
final reply in response to matters raised in prior submissions in this
proceeding, particularly at the oral hearing held from July 6 to 14,
2009.
Document:
1249402.pdf - 559KO
2009-07-24 - Canadian
Independent Record Production Association (CIRPA)
Description: As per PN Telecom 2008-19-3, CIRPA is filing its
final comments in response to the written submissions and the actual
appearances and comments made by participants in this hearing.
Herein we address what we feel are the key issues that have surfaced
and that, given the many and varied comments expressed by different
participants will no doubt be debated even after the Commission's decision
is rendered.
Document: 1248795.doc - 474KO
2009-07-22 - TCPub Média Inc.
Description: I would like to offer my comments to the Commission following the public hearings concerning the review of current traffic management practices by the nation's Internet service providers.
Document: 1248704.pdf - 90KO
2009-04-30 - CBC/Radio-Canada
Description: In accordance with the procedures established
by Review of the Internet traffic management practices of Internet service
providers, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-19, 20 November 2008 (PN
2008-19), CBC/Radio-Canada is pleased to provide the Commission with
these Reply Comments.
Document: 1116489.pdf
- 50KO
2009-04-30 - Score
Media Inc.
Description: As the parent company to The Score Television Network Ltd.
(The Score), a sports, news and information specialty service which
generates significant fixed and mobile Internet traffic to and from
sports fans, Score Media Inc. (SMI) is pleased to file this reply comment,
responding to initial comments in the proceeding initialed by the Public
Notice.
Document: 1111747.pdf
- 1343KO
2009-04-30 - Canadian
Film and Television Production Association (CFTPA)
Description: Please find attached the Canadian Film and Television Production
Association’s reply comments in respect of the above-named proceeding.
Document: 1111275.pdf
- 173KO
2009-04-30 - Public
Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel
for Consumers’ Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty
Organization and Option consommateurs (the “Consumer Groups”)
is pleased to enclose its Comments in the above matter.
Document: 1110596.zip
- 103KO
2004-04-30 - Union
des consommateurs
Description: La présente fait état des répliques
aux observations des parties par Union des
consommateurs, un organisme à but non lucratif qui regroupe des
associations
coopératives d’économie familiale (ACEF), l’Association
des consommateurs pour la
qualité dans la construction (ACQC) ainsi que des membres individuels,
dans le cadre de
l’Avis public 2008-19- Examen des pratiques de gestion du trafic
Internet des
fournisseurs de services Internet.
Document: 1110531.zip
- 746KO
2009-04-30 - Execulink
Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (Execulink) is in receipt of Comments
with respect to
Internet traffic management practices. These are Execulink Reply Comments.
Document: 1110408.pdf
- 76KO
2009-04-30 - The Council
of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) and ARCH Disability Law Centre
(ARCH)
Description: On behalf of the Council of Canadians with Disabilities
(CCD) and ARCH Disability Law Centre (ARCH), I am pleased to submit
the enclosed Reply.
Document: 1109714.zip
- 32KO
2009-04-30 - Open
Internet Coalition
Description: This proceeding ultimately raises a simple issue:
Should Internet service providers be permitted to block, degrade, interfere
with, or otherwise adversely affect particular applications
Document: 1109172.zip
- 2045KO
2009-04-30- Distributel
Communications Limited
Description: In accordance with the procedure set out in Telecom
Public Notice CRTC 2008-19, Distributel is submitting the following
reply comments.
Document: 1109152.pdf
- 89KO
2009-04-30 - Sandvine
Incorporated ULC
Description: Attached are Sandvine's Reply Comments in connection
with Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-19, Review of Internet Traffic
Management Practices of Internet Service Providers.
Document: 1109151.pdf
- 364KO
2009-04-30 - Pelmorex
Media Inc. (Pelmorex)
Description: Pelmorex Media Inc. (Pelmorex) is pleased to provide these
reply comments regarding to the above-noted public consultation, which
seeks input on the Internet traffic management practices of Internet
service providers (ISPs).
Document: 1108481.pdf
- 33KO
2009-04-30 - Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC)
Description: Please find attached comments pursuant in the above-mentioned proceeding, filed on behalf of the Campaign for Democratic Media, pursuant to the procedure set out in the above-captioned Public Notice.
Document: 1259305.zip - 451KO
Section 4d) Demandes de divulgation
2009-01-19 - Canadian
Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC)
Description: In accordance with the procedure set out in the
above-captioned public notice, please find attached our request on behalf
of our client, the Campaign for Democratic Media, for public disclosure
of information filed in confidence by certain parties.
Document: 1009624.zip
- 48KO
2009-01-19 - Canadian
Film and Television Production Association (CFTPA)
Description: Please find attached the Canadian Film and Television
Production Association’s requests for public disclosure of information
filed in confidence by the parties listed in the Commission’s
letter of December 12, 2008 in respect of the above-named proceeding.
Document: 1009598.zip
- 93KO
2009-01-19 - Union
des consommateurs
Description: Union des consommateurs a reçu les réponses des parties
aux demandes de renseignements par le Conseil, pour l'instance relative
à l'examen des pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs
de services Internet.
Document: 1009189.pdf
- 110KO
2009-01-19 - Public
Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel
for Consumers’ Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty
Organization and Option consommateurs (the “Consumer Groups”)
is pleased to enclose its requests for disclosure on the public record
of the information filed in confidence of The Companies and Rogers in
response to the Commission’s interrogatories of 4 December 2008
in the above matter.
Document: 1009391.zip
- 127KO
Section 4e) Réponses aux demandes de divulgation
(voir section 5)
Section 5 - Réponses aux demandes de renseignements
2009-07-22 - Bell
Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
(the Companies)
Description: During their recent internal review, Bell Aliant Regional
Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada
(collectively, the Companies) discovered an error in the methodology
Bell Aliant used to calculate the average monthly usage per end-user
for Bell Aliant (Atlantic region) that was filed in their interrogatory
response to The Companies(CRTC)4Dec08-2 PN2008-19 Supplemental
filed with the Commission on 9 February 2009.
Document: 1247382.zip
- 69KO
2009-04-23 - Primus
Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Accordingly, Primus is filing a revised version of Primus(CRTC)4Dec08-8.
Primus is filing this revised interrogatory to ensure that information
regarding Primus' recent implementation of its QoS Internet traffic
management solution is available to all interested parties.
Document: 1097902.zip
- 235KO
2009-02-11 - Bragg
Communications Inc. (Eastlink)
Description: Please find attached Bragg's revised response to the
Commission's interrogatories which were filed on February 9, 2009.
Document: 1022605.zip
- 144KO
2009-02-11 - Quebecor
Media inc. (QMI) aunom de Vidéotron ltée
Description: Conformément aux procédures énoncées dans l'AP
2008-19 et dans la lettre du Conseil du 04 février 2009, QMI, au nom
de sa filiale Vidéotron ltée (Vidéotron), dépose ci-joint ses renseignements
additionnels suite aux demandes de divulgation
Document: 1022570.zip
- 102KO
2009-02-09 - Barrett
Xplore Inc. (BXI)
Description: Pursuant to the letter from the Commission dated
February 4, 2009 requesting additional information be placed on the
public record, please find attached the Revised Abridged Answers of
Barrett Xplore Inc. to the interrogatories posed by the Commission in
the above-referenced proceeding.
Document: 1021552.zip
- 489KO
2009-02-09 - Primus
Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus is in receipt of the Commission's letter
dated 4 February 2009, in which the Commission has directed parties
to disclose information on the public record.
Document: 1021515.zip
- 62KO
2009-02-09 - Shaw
Communications Inc.
Description: Supplemental responses - PN 2008-19
Document: 1021488.zip
- 564KO
2009-02-09 - Primus
Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: In its 13 January 2009 interrogatory responses, Primus
noted that it would revise its response to Primus(CRTC)4Dec08-2 when
more complete information was available.
Document: 1021462.zip
- 59KO
2009-02-09 - MTS
Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures specified at paragraph
20 of PN 2008-19, and pursuant to the Commission's letter dated
4 February 2009, MTS submits the following supplemental responses to
request for public disclosure of interrogatories.
Document: 1021375.zip
- 73KO
2009-02-09 - Bell
Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
(the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in the Commission's
4 February 2009 letter, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited
Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies)
are filing their revised responses to the following interrogatories
Document: 1021346.zip
- 92KO
2009-02-09 - Saskatchewan
Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the directions specified in the Commission's
letter of 4 February 2009, which addressed requests for disclosure of
information filed in confidence withthe Commission in the above mentionned
proceeding, SaskTel is providing a revised resposnes to SASKTEL(CRTC)04Dec2008-1(a)
PN 2008-19.
Document: 1021223.zip
- 32KO
2009-02-09 - Bragg
Communications Inc. (Eastlink)
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter dated 4 February
2009, Bragg Communications Inc. (Eastlink) hereby files the further
interrogatory responses as directed by the Commission, for the public
record.
Document: 1021195.zip
- 144KO
2009-02-03 - Barrett
Xplore Inc. (BXI)
Description: Pursuant to PN 2008-19, Barrett Xplore
Inc. (BXI) is hereby filing its responses to the requests for public
disclosure of confidential information that was filed by BXI in response
to the Commission's December 4, 2008 interrogatories.
Document: 1019572.pdf
- 62KO
2009-01-26 - MTS
Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures specified at paragraph 17 of
Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-19, Review of the Internet traffic management
practices of Internet service providers (PN 2008-19), MTS Allstream
Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the following response to requests for
public disclosure of information filed in confidence with the Commission.
Responses to the requesting parties and interrogatories identified are
provided in the Attachment. MTS Allstream is also including a revised
version of the confidential interrogatory response MTS Allstream(CRTC)04Dec08-1
which contained a numerical error.
Document: 1013480.zip
- 76KO
2009-01-26 - Bell
Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
(The Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Telecom Public Notice
CRTC 2008-19, Review of the Internet traffic management practices of
Internet service providers (PN 2008-19), Bell Aliant Regional Communications,
Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, the
Companies) are filing their response to the requests for public disclosure
(the requests) of information filed in confidence by the Companies and
other ISPs in this proceeding.
Document: 1013475.zip
- 48KO
2009-01-26 - Cogeco
Cable Inc. (Cogeco) on behalf of Cogeco Cable Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Telecom Public Notice
2008-19 (TPN 2008-19), paragraph 19, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) on behalf
of Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. hereby provides its responses to requests
for public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been
claimed in Cogeco’s responses to the CRTC interrogatories 1, 2,
3, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 13.
Document: 1013473.pdf
- 66KO
2009-01-26 - Shaw
Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in paragraph 19 of Public
Notice CRTC 2008-19, Shaw Communications Inc. (“Shaw”) is
filing its written response to the requests for the public disclosure
of information supplied by Shaw in response to the
Commission’s interrogatories for which confidentiality has been
claimed.
Document: 1013472.pdf
- 27KO
2009-01-26 - Quebecor
Media Inc. au nom de Vidéotron ltée
Description:Conformément aux procédures énoncées dans l’AP 2008-19
et dans la lettre du Conseil du 4 décembre 2008, QMI, au nom de sa filiale
Vidéotron ltée (Vidéotron), dépose ci-joint ses réponses aux demandes
de divulgation du 19 janvier 2009 de Clinique d’intérêt public
et de politique d’Internet du Canada (CIPPIC), l’Association
canadienne de production de films et de télévision (ACPFT), l’Association
canadienne des fournisseurs Internet (ACFI) et l’Union des consommateurs
(UDC) (ou, collectivement, les Associations).
Document: 1013471.doc
- 184KO
2009-01-26 - Rogers
Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission for
this proceeding at paragraph 19 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-19
(PN 2008-19), Rogers Communications Inc. ("Rogers") is filing
herewith through e-pass its responses to requests for public disclosure
of information, further to interrogatories it received December 4, 2008,
filed in confidence with the Commission.
Document: 1013470.pdf
- 112KO
2009-01-26 - Bragg
Communications Inc. (Eastlink)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in Telecom
Public Notice 2008-19 – Review of the Internet Traffic Management
Practices of Internet Service Providers, Bragg Communications Inc.,
(“Bragg”) is filing its response to the request by various
parties to this proceeding for public disclosure of certain interrogatory
responses that were filed in confidence with the Commission.
Document: 1013440.pdf
- 142KO
2009-01-26 - TELUS
Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedure set out in the
above-noted public notice, below are the responses of TELUS Communications
Company (“TELUS”) to requests for public disclosure of information
for which confidentiality has been claimed dated 19 January 2009 received
from Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic, on behalf
of Campaign for Democratic Media (“CDM”) and Canadian Film
& Television Production Association (“CFTPA”).
Document: 1013439.pdf
- 33KO
2009-01-26 - Saskatchewan
Telecommunications
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is
in receipt of a letter from the Canadian Association of Internet Providers
(CAIP) dated 13 January 2009, and letters from the Canadian Film and
Television Production Association (CFTPA), the Union des Consommateurs
(UC), The Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest
Clinic (CIPPIC) and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) dated
19 January
2009, in which the writers request disclosure of information which SaskTel
requested be kept confidential in the responses filed by the company
in response to the Commission’s interrogatories addressed to the
parties involved in Telecom Public
Notice CRTC 2008-19 on 4 December 2008. The attached comprises SaskTel’s
response to these requests.
Document: 1013435.zip
- 75KO
2009-01-26 - Primus
Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus)
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus) is in receipt
of Requests for Public Disclosure in the referenced proceeding by Canadian
Association of Internet Providers (CAIP), Public Interest Advocacy Centre
(PIAC), Union des Consommateurs (UC), Canadian Film and Television Production
Association (CFTPA) and Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest
Clinic (CIPPIC) (collectively the Disclosure Requests). Pursuant
to the procedures established by the Commission in its letter, dated
4 December 2008, Primus hereby its Response.
Document: 1013394.pdf
- 82KO
2009-01-13 - Saskatchewan
Telecommunications
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 17 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC
2008-19 (PN 2008-19) Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits
its responses to interrogatories issued by the Commission on 04 December
2008 .
Document: 1006369.zip
- 203KO
2009-01-13 - Shaw
Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 17 of Telecom Public Notice 2008-19;
Review of the Internet traffic management practices of Internet service
providers, Shaw Communications Inc. ("Shaw") herein submits
its responses to the Commission interrogatories of 4 December 2008 .
Document: 1006425.zip
- 139KO
2009-01-13 - MTS
Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures specified at paragraph 17 of
Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-19, Review of the Internet traffic management
practices of Internet service providers (PN 2008-19), MTS Allstream
Inc. (MTS Allstream) hereby submits the following response to interrogatories
issued in Commission staff letter 4 December 2008:
Document: 1006651.zip
- 162KO
2009-01-13 - Primus
Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. ("Primus")
is in receipt of the Commission's letter, dated 4 December 2008
, in which it addressed interrogatories to a number of companies. Pursuant
to the procedures established in that letter, Primus hereby submits
its responses.
Document: 1006808.zip
- 101KBO
2009-01-13 - Bell
Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
(The Companies)
Description: Pursuant to PN 2008-19, attached are responses to interrogatories
from the Commission dated 4 December 2008 . This submission
includes responses to interrogatories submitted on behalf of Bell Aliant
Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell
Canada (collectively, the Companies).
Document: 1006810.zip
- 1638KO
2009-01-13 - Rogers
Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission for
this proceeding in its June 10, 2008 letter, Rogers Communications Inc.
("Rogers") is filing herewith through e-pass its responses
to the interrogatories it received from the CRTC on December 4, 2008.
Document: 1005723.zip
- 99KO
2009-01-13 - QMI, au nom de Vidéotron ltée
Description: Conformément aux procédures énoncées dans l’AP 2008-19
et dans la lettre du Conseil du 4 décembre 2008, QMI, au nom de sa filiale
Vidéotron ltée (« Vidéotron »), dépose ci-joint ses réponses
aux demandes de renseignements du Conseil.
Document: 1005725.zip
- 184KO
2009-01-13 - Bragg Communications Inc. (Eastlink)
Description:Pursuant to the Commission’s letter dated 4 December,
2008 Bragg Communications Inc., carrying on business as EastLink (“EastLink”)
hereby files its ABRIDGED responses to the interrogatory questions posed
by the Commission in the abovereferenced proceeding.
Document: 1005749.zip
- 189KO
2009-01-13 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 17 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC
2008-19, Review of the Internet traffic management practices of Internet
service providers, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) submits on behalf of Cogeco
Cable Canada Inc. its responses to the Commission interrogatories.
Description: 1005754.zip
- 292KO
2009-01-13 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedure set out in the above-noted
public notice,
attached are the responses of TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”)
to
the interrogatories issued by the Commission on December 4, 2008.
Document: 1005778.zip
- 526KO
2009-01-13 - Barrett Xplore Inc.
Description: Please find attached the Answers of Barrett Xplore Inc.
(BXI) to the interrogatories posed by the Commission in the above-referenced
proceeding.
Document: 1005799.zip
- 77KO
Section 6) - Pièces et répliques aux questions soulevées lors de l'audience publique
2009-07-29 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: In Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.'s ("Primus") 28 July 2009 Final Reply Comments to the above noted proceeding, Primus noted that it would provide an answer to the question posed by Commissioner Katz during Primus' presentation at the oral hearing regarding Primus' rationale for not utilizing Cable Company Third Party Internet Access to date under a separate cover letter. Accordingly, Primus hereby files its answer.
Document: 125078.doc - 87KO
2009-07-28 - Public
Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC),
as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty
Organization and Option consommateur (the Consumer Groups) is pleased
to enclose its Written Reply Comments and Consumer Groups' Undertakings
in the above matter.
Document:
1249542.zip - 3198KO
2009-07-22 - Bell
Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
(the Companies) - Undertaking
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
(Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively,
the Companies) are filing the attached undertaking responses.
For ease of identification, the Companies have included the transcript
references in the headings of the responses.
Document: 1247413.zip - 60KO
2009-07-20 - Quebecor
Media inc. (QMI) pour Vidéotron ltée -
Réplique
Description: QMI, au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron ltée,
dépose ci-joint ses réponses aux engagements pris lors
de sa comparution à l'audience publique sur le sujet mentionné
en rubrique.
Document: 1245916.pdf - 176KO
2009-07-20 - Council
of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) and ARCH Disability Law Centre
(ARCH) - Undertaking
Description: On behalf of the Council of Canadians with Disabilities
(CCD) and ARCH Disability Law Centre ( ARCH ), please find attached
the response to a question of Vice-chairman Katz made during our presentation
on July 8, 2008
Document: 1245754.zip - 126KO
2009-07-17 - TELUS Communications Company - Undertaking
Description: Following TELUS Communications Company's July 10, 2009 oral presentation at the hearing in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1245747.pdf - 18KO
2009-07-09 - Independent Film and Television Association - Undertaking
Document: 1241282.pdf - 247KO
2009-11-01 - Jason Roks
Description: The response from Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada, to the Claims for Cost filed by Mr. Jason Roks, Dated, Oct 16th, 2009, re: CRTC-200-19 just recently came to my attention. My understanding was I had more time to respond than is the case.
Document: 1314609.pdf - 72KO
2009-10-16 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (The Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communi ca tions, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of a costs claim dated 5 October 2009 by Jason Roks in relation to the above-mentioned proceeding totaling $1,565.20. The following constitutes the Companies' response.
Document: 1297991.doc - 80KO
2009-10-05 - The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for the Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada, Canada Without Poverty (formerly the National Anti-Poverty Organization) and Option consommateurs (the “Consumer Groups”) is in receipt of correspondence to the Commission from Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Shaw Communications Inc. (who term themselves the “Costs Respondents”) as well as correspondence to the Commission from TELUS, both dated September 25, 2009, and correspondence from Barrett Xplore Inc., dated 15 September 2009 and previous letters from Bell Canada and TELUS in the above matter.
Document: 1282153.pdf - 34KO
2009-10-05 - Council of Canadians with Disabilities and ARCH Disability Law Centre (CCD/ARCH)
Description: In this letter the Council of Canadians with Disabilities and ARCH Disability Law Centre (CCD/ARCH) respond to the September 25, 2009 letter of Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Costs Respondents) as well as to correspondence to the Commission from TELUS, dated September 25, 2009 and correspondence from Barrett Xplore Inc., dated 15 September 2009.
Document: 1282057.pdf - 291KO
2009-10-05 - Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) for the Campaign for Democratic Media
Description: CDM is in receipt of responses challenging its cost claim of August 31, 2009 as amended on September 3, 2009 in a submission from Barrett Xplore (“Barrett”),1 a joint submission from various Bell companies, Cogeco Cable, Rogers Communications, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, and Shaw Communications (“Bell, et al.”),2 and a submission from TELUS.3 CDM makes this submission in response to these challenges.
Document: 1282012.pdf - 1,679KO
2009-10-05 - Jason Roks
Description: I hereby apply for an award of costs in the above noted proceedings pursuant to s 44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure
Document: 1281498.zip - 696KO
2009-10-05 - Union des consommateurs
Description: Le 25 septembre 2009, les Compagnies Bell Alliant, Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Shaw Communications Inc., (ci-après les Compagnies) ont déposé auprès du Conseil une lettre pour contester les demandes d'adjudication de frais des participants, dont Union des consommateurs, à l'avis public de télécom CRTC 2008-19. Le même jour la compagnie Telus (ci-après Telus) a également envoyé au Conseil et aux parties une lettre pour contester les demandes d'adjudication de frais.
Document: 1281350.pdf - 1,222KO
2009-09-30 - Canadian Association of the Deaf (CAD)
Description: CAD notes the concern and comments of the various Internet Service Providers in regards to the cost applications. None of the ISPs have objected to the costs that CAD applied for but several have indicated that other parties should have claimed similar costs and that the costs that these other parties claimed were excessive.
Document: 1281702.pdf - 63KO
2009-09-25 -
Jason Roks
Description: Application for costs
Document: 1277952.pdf
- 207KO
2009-09-25 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt of three rather remarkable applications for costs in the above-noted proceeding from the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (“CCD”)/ARCH Disability Law Centre (“ARCH”), the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (“PIAC”) on behalf of the Consumer Groups, and the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (“CIPPIC”), counsel to the Campaign for Democratic Media (“CDM”), as well as two other applications from the Canadian Association of the Deaf (“CAD”) and Union des Consommateurs (“UdC”).
Document: 1277746.pdf - 30KO
2009-09-25 - Bell Aliant Regional Communi ca tions, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies), Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communi ca tions Inc. (Rogers), Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Costs Respondents)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communi ca tions, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies), Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communi ca tions Inc. (Rogers), Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Costs Respondents) are in receipt of costs claims in relation to the above-mentioned proceeding totaling in excess of $430,000.00. The following constitutes the Costs Respondents' response to these claims.
Document: 1277722.doc - 94KO
2009-09-14 - Barrett Xplore Inc.
Description: These comments
are submitted by Barrett Xplore Inc. and Barrett Broadband Networks
Inc. (Barrett) in response to the various applications for the
award of costs in the above noted proceeding by PIAC, ARCH, Union
des Consummateurs, Canadian Association of the Deaf and the Canadian
Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC), on behalf
of the Campaign for Democratic Media
(CDM).
Document: 1269843.pdf - 58KO
2009-09-11 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of costs claims in relation to the above-mentioned proceeding totaling in excess of $430,000.00 By comparison, total costs awarded for all proceedings in 2008 totaled $359,412.76.
Document: 1269085.doc - 68KO
2009-09-11 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt of a letter dated today in which Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) request that the response deadline to the cost claims received with regard to the above-noted Public Notice be extended to 25 September 2009.
Document: 1268932.pdf - 27KO
2009-09-03 - 2009-10-05 - Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) for the Campaign for Democratic Media
Description: On August 28, 2009, the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) filed on behalf of its client, the Campaign for Democratic Media (CDM), an application (Application) asking the Commission to issue and tax a cost award with respect to CDM's participation in the above noted public notice. As per Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2002-5, CIPPIC included a bill of costs with its initial Application.
Document: 1293533.zip - 1,874KO
2009-09-08 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: Answer of Canadian Association of Internet Providers (“CAIP”) to Costs Application of l’Union des Consommateurs.
Document: 1266124.pdf - 82KO
2009-09-08 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: Answer of Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) to Costs Application filed by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of the Consumer Groups.
Document: 1266120.pdf - 82KO
2009-09-08 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: Answer of Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) to Costs Application filed by the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) on behalf of the Campaign for Democratic Media (CDM).
Document: 1266113.pdf - 83KO
2009-09-08 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: Answer of Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) to Costs Application of Council of Canadians with Disabilities and ARCH Disability Law Centre (CCD/ARCH).
Document: 1266090.pdf - 82KO
2009-09-08 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: Answer of Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) to Costs Application of Canadian Association of the Deaf (CAD).
Document: 1266076.pdf - 81KO
2009-08-28 - Canadian Association of the Deaf (CAD)
Description: This is an application for costs and taxation thereof, made on behalf of the Canadian Association of the Deaf in respect of it's participation in the above noted proceeding.
Document: 1263292.zip - 11179KO
2009-08-28 - Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC)
Description: The Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) hereby applies on behalf of its client, the Campaign for Democratic Media (CDM) for an award of costs in the above noted proceeding pursuant to s. 44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure.
Document: 1263241.zip - 3714KO
2009-08-28 - Union des consommateurs
Description: Conformément
à l'article 44 des Règles de procédure
du CRTC en matière de télécommunications
et à l'Avis public CRTC 2002-5, l'Union des
consommateurs demande l'adjudication de ses frais pour sa
participation à l'Avis public 2008-19 - Examen des
pratiques de gestion du trafic Internet des fournisseurs de services
Internet.
Document: 1263133.zip
- 1213KO
2009-08-28 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for the Consumer Groups
Description: This is an application for costs and taxation hereof, made on behalf of the Consumer Groups in respect of their participation in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1262005.pdf - 722KO
2009-08-24 - The Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) and ARCH Disability Law Centre (ARCH)
Description: The Council of Canadians with Disabilities (CCD) and ARCH Disability Law Centre (ARCH), in accordance with Rule 44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, jointly apply for costs
Document: 1260586.zip - 2181KO
2012-05-17 - Québecor Média inc.
Description: Québecor Média inc. (Québecor Média), au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron et en conformité
avec la PRT 2009-657, soumet par la présente une révision des pages tarifaires 32C et 32D de
son Tarif AITP. La publication de ces pages fait suite au lancement, en date de la présente, du
service d’accès Internet très grande vitesse 200 (TGV200) et a pour but d’ajouter une référenceà ce service dans les pages traitant des pratiques de gestion de trafic Internet de Vidéotron.
Nous soumettons également une nouvelle page de contrôle 2.
Document: 1719029.pdf - 111KO
2012-03-01 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
Description: ISSUED PAGES as per Telecom Regulatory Policy 2009-657.
Document: 1680885.doc - 139KO
2011-01-10 - Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron
Description: Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI), on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby provides the Commission with the attached newly published pages 32C and 32D for General Tariff CRTC 26950, the purpose of which is to include information regarding technical Internet Traffic Management Practices (ITMPs) affecting Videotron’s wholesale services.
Document: 1486376.pdf - 74KO
2010-05-12 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Please find attached revised tariff pages (along with the existing tariff pages) that reflect Telecom Policy CRTC 2009-657, 21 October 2009. These tariff revisions incorporate the conditions that the Commission imposed on Internet service Providers in situations where Internet traffic management practices are used.
Document: 1393849.zip - 204KO
2009-11-27 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Attached for the Commission’s information is a new appended page 20 to Shaw
Cablesystems G.P. (“Shaw”) Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) Tariff (CRTC 26300).
Document: 1327994.zip - 118KO
2009-11-27 - Télébec, Société en commandite
Description: ISSUED PAGES as per Telecom Regulatory Policy 2009-657.
Document: 1328002.doc - 85KO
2009-11-26 - NorthernTel Limited Partnership
Description: ISSUED PAGES as per Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2009-657.
Document: 1327949.doc - 159KO
2009-11-20 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited PartnershipBell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
Description: Issued pages as per Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2009-657.
Document: 1325206.zip - 159KO
Transcriptions
de la consultation en ligne (de langue anglaise)
Transcriptions
de la consultation en ligne (de langue française)
- Date de modification :