2006-09-01 - #:  8663-C12-200610924 - Avis public 2006-12 - Instance visant à réévaluer certains éléments du cadre d'abstention de la réglementation des services locaux établi dans la décision 2006-15

Déposer en utilisant les services en ligne

• Calendrier - Avis Public
• Liste des documents connexes

Calendrier - Avis Public 2006-12
 

Liste des documents connexes

Section 1 - Documents du Conseil
a) Avis public, Décisions, etc.
b) Liste des parties intéressées
c) Correspondance aux parties
d) Demandes de renseignements

Section 2 - Documents d'Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Allstream Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications et TELUS Communications Inc.
a) Correspondance au Conseil
b) Observations
c) Demandes de renseignements
d) Demandes de réponses complémentaires à leurs demandes de renseignements et de divulgation
e) Réponses aux demandes de réponses complémentaires aux demandes de renseignements et de divulgation
f) Renseignements devant être soumis suite à une décision
g) Observations finales
h) Répliques aux observations

Section 4 - Documents des Parties
a) Correspondance au Conseil
b) Observations
c) Demandes de renseignements
d ) Demandes de réponses complémentaires à leurs demandes de renseignement et de divulgation
e) Réponses aux demandes de réponses complémentaires aux demandes de renseignements et de divulgation
f) Renseignements devant être soumis suite à une décision
g) Observations finales
h) Répliques aux observations

Section 5 - Réponses aux demandes de renseignements

Section 8 - Documents divers
a) Frais
b) Autres

Section 1a) Avis public, Decision, etc.

2007-05-09 - Circulaire de télécom CRTC 2007-14 État de certaines instances à la lumière du décret modifiant la Décision de télécom CRTC 2006‑15.

2007-05-09 - Ordonnance de frais de télécom CRTC 2007-10 Le Conseil approuve la demande d'adjudication de frais présentée par le Centre pour la défense de l'intérêt public, formulée au nom de l'Association des consommateurs du Canada et de l'Organisation nationale anti‑pauvreté, pour leur participation aux instances amorcées par l'avis Instance visant à examiner s'il convient de considérer que les services sans fil mobiles appartiennent au même marché pertinent que les services locaux filaires aux fins de l'abstention et questions connexes, Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006‑9, 16 juin 2006, et par l'avis Instance visant à réévaluer certains éléments du cadre d'abstention de la réglementation des services locaux établi dans la décision 2006‑15, Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006‑12, 1er septembre 2006. Référence : 8663‑C12‑200610924 and 4754‑289.

2007-03-07 - Ordonnance de frais de télécom CRTC 2007-2 Le Conseil approuve la demande d'adjudication de frais présentée par l'Union des consommateurs pour sa participation à l'instance amorcée par l'avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12. Référence : 8663-C12-200610924 et 4754-281

Section 1c) Correspondance aux parties

2006-11-01 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à la Liste de distribution - Objet: Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12 - Instance visant à réévaluer certains éléments du cadre d'abstention de la réglementation des services locaux établi dans la décision 2006-15 - Demande de prorogation de la période d'observations en réplique

2006-11-01 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à la Liste de distribution - Objet: Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12 - Instance visant à réévaluer certains éléments du cadre d'abstention de la réglementation des services locaux établi dans la décision 2006-15 - Dépôt de certains renseignements regroupés au dossier public

2006-10-20 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à la Liste de distribution - Objet: Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12 - Instance visant à réévaluer certains éléments du cadre d'abstention de la réglementation des services locaux établi dans la décision 2006-15 - Dépôt de certains renseignements regroupés au dossier public

2006-10-18 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à la Liste de distribution - Objet: Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12 - Instance visant à réévaluer certains éléments du cadre d'abstention de la réglementation des services locaux établi dans la décision 2006-15 - Dépôt de certains renseignements regroupés au dossier public

2006-10-11 - Lettre du Conseil
Description:  Lettre adressée à la Liste de distribution - Objet: Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12 - Instance visant à réévaluer certains éléments du cadre d'abstention de la réglementation des services locaux établi dans la décision 2006-15 - Requête pour modification à la cédule

2006-09-20 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à la liste de distribution - Objet:  Processus de justification concernant le regroupement et la publication de certains renseignements - Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12 intitulé Instance visant à réévaluer certains éléments du cadre d’abstention de la réglementation des services locaux établi dans la décision 2006-15

Section 1d) Demandes de renseignements

2006-10-06 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Description: Lettre adressée à Bell Canada - Objet: Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12 intitulé Instance visant à réévaluer certains éléments du cadre d’abstention de la réglementation des services locaux établi dans la décision 2006-15 - Réponses supplémentaires aux demandes de renseignements

2006-09-01- Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée Liste de distribution - Objet: Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12– Instance visant la réévaluation de certains aspects du cadre d’abstention local établi dans la décision 2006-15 - Demandes de renseignements

Section 2a) Correspondance au Conseil

2006-10-31 - Bell Canada
Description:  Bell Canada (or the Company) is in receipt of a letter by TELUS Communications Company (TELUS) dated 27 October 2006 requesting a one-week extension to file reply comments in PN 2006-12.
Document:  685177.doc - 62KO

2006-10-31 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  TELUS is in receipt of letters dated October 30, 2006 from the Competitors and PIAC responding to TELUS' request for an extension in the deadline for filing Reply in the PN 2006-12 proceeding.
Document:  685144.pdf - 31KO

2006-10-31 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is in receipt of a letter from TELUS Communications Company (TELUS), dated 27 October 2006 , requesting an extension of one week to the deadline for filing reply comments in the above noted proceeding from 2 November 2006 to 9 November 2006.
Document:  685135.doc - 82KO

2006-10-27 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  TELUS requests an extension of one week for parties to fille their Reply Comments in the PN 2006-12 proceeding.
Document:  683930.pdf - 22KO

2006-10-06 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  In PN 2006-12, the Commission set out a deadline of 19 October 2006 for parties to file (1) comments with regard to the market share loss threshold set out in Decision 2006-15 and (2) final comments with regard to the substitutability of mobile wireless services for local wireline services, as set out in PN 2006-9.
Document: 677110.pdf - 308KO

Section 2b) Observations (Voir également les observations sous l'AP 2006-9)

2006-10-03 - Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description:  Attached is a revised version of the comments of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) in the above referenced proceeding.
Document:  675436.zip - 148KO

2006-09-28 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description:  Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) received your letter, dated 20 September 2006 , which proposed that the following market data, aggregated on a national level, be placed on the public record
Document:  673440.doc - 61KO

2006-09-28 - Bell Canada
Description: This letter provides the comments of Bell Canada (or the Company) concerning the show cause letter dated 20 September 2006 in the above matter, in which Commission staff (Staff) proposed that the following market data, aggregated on a national level, be placed on the public record
Document:  673438.doc - 75KO

2006-09-28 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  TELUS is in receipt of a letter from Commission staff , dated 20 September 2006, requiring parties to show cause why the Commission should not place on the public record
Document:  673436.pdf - 40KO

2006-09-28 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is in receipt of a Commission staff letter dated 20 September 2006 requiring MTS Allstream to show cause, why the Commission should not publish on an aggregated basis certain information filed in confidence, pursuant to Section 39 of the Telecommunications Act , by parties of the Commission's proceeding initiated by Telecom Public Notice 2006-12
Document:  673422.doc - 81KO

2006-09-28 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Patnership
Description:  The following represents the comments of Bell Aliant Regional Communications to the show cause letter dated 20 September 2006 in the above matter
Document: 673412.pdf - 99KO

Section 2c) Demandes de renseignements

Aucun documents

Section 2d) Demandes de réponses complémentaires à leurs demandes de renseignements et de divulgation

2006-09-21 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Document: In accordance with paragraph 15 of Telecom Public Notice 2006-9 (PN 2006-9) and paragraph 20 of Telecom Public Notice 2006-12 (PN 2006-12), MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) requests public disclosure from Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, SaskTel and T é l é bec (Bell et al.) in regards to interrogatory The Companies(MTS Allstream)18Aug06-1 PN 2006-9.
Document: 669701.doc - 87KO

Section 2e) Réponses aux demandes de réponses complémentaires aux demandes de renseignements et de divulgation

Aucun documents

Section 2f) Renseignements devant être soumis suite à une décision

Aucun documents

Section 2g) Observations finales

2006-10-26 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  Pursuant to the process established by the Commission in PN 2006-12, as modified by Commission's staff letter dated 11 October 2006, please find attached TELUS comments in response to PN 2006-12 and Final comments in response to PN 2006-9.
Document: 683914.zip - 136KO

2006-10-26 - Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description:  In accordance with paragraph 23 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006 12, as amended by Commission staff in a letter dated 11 October 2006, attached is the joint submission of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited partnership, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the Companies) in the above referenced proceedings.
Document:  683697.zip - 104KO

2006-10-26 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-9, as amended by paragraph 23 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 and as further amended by the Commission staff letter of 11 October 2006, MTS Allstream submits the following comments.
Document:  683674.doc - 195KO

2006-10-26 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: S askatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is party to the joint submission of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada , and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, The Companies), filed on this date in the above referenced proceedings
Document:  683638.zip - 44KO

Section 2h) Répliques aux observations

2006-11-07 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission in PN 2006-12, as modified by Commission's staff letter dated 1 November 2006, please find attached TELUS Reply Comments in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 687405.pdf - 495KO

2006-11-07 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-9, as amended by paragraph 23 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 and as further amended by the Commission staff letter of 11 October 2006, MTS Allstream submits the following reply comments.
Document: 687402.doc - 156KO

2006-11-07 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description:  In accordance with paragraph 24 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, as amended by Commission staff in a letter dated 1 November 2006, attached is the joint submission of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) in the above referenced proceedings.
Document: 687375.doc - 428KO

Section 4a) Correspondance au Conseil

2006-10-30 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description:  Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively , the Competitors) are in receipt of a letter from TELUS Communications Company (TELUS), dated October 27, 2006, requesting an extension of one week to the deadline for filing Reply Comments in the above noted proceeding from November 2 to November 9.
Document:  684933.doc - 795KO

2006-10-30 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description:  The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the Consumer Groups) is in receipt of a letter dated October 27, 2006 from TELUS to the Commission requesting an extension of one week to file reply evidence in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 684658.doc - 12KO

2006-10-11 - Cogeco Cable Inc, Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description:  The Competitors are in receipt of a letter from MTS Allstream dated 6 October 2006 to the CRTC requesting an extension of one week to the deadlines for the filing of comments (market share) and final comments (wireless) and reply comments.
Document: 677961.pdf - 41KO

Section 4b) Observations

2006-09-28 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description:  Cogeco Cable inc. ( Cogeco ) is in receipt of your letter, dated 20 September 2006 , requiring that each party show cause why the Commission should not publish on an aggregated basis certain information filed in confidence, pursuant to Section 39 of the Telecommunications Act , by parties as part of the Commission's proceeding initiated by PN 2006-12
Document:  673504.doc - 137KO

2006-09-28 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description:  Rogers hereby responds to the Commission's letter of 20 September 2006 requesting that those interested parties who filed responses to the Commission interrogatories dated 1 September 2006 show cause
Document:  673443.pdf - 61KO

2006-09-28 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description:  La présente expose les commentaires de Télébec concernant la demande de justification en date du 20 septembre 2006 relative à l'objet ci-dessus
Document: 673430.pdf - 31KO

Section 4c) Demandes de renseignements

Aucun documents

Section 4d) Demandes de réponses complémentaires à leurs demandes de renseignement et de divulgation

Aucun documents

Section 4e) Réponses aux demandes de réponses complémentaires aux demandes de renseignement et de divulgation

2006-09-20 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description: The Consumer Groups (Consumers' Association of Canada; National Anti-Poverty Organization and l'Union des consommateurs) are pleased to enclose their response to interrogatories of the Commission , in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 669880.zip - 225KO

Section 4f) Renseignements devant être soumis suite à une décision

Aucun documents

Section 4g) Observations finales

2006-10-27 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus) is in receipt of Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, dated 1 September 2006. Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in PN 06-12, Primus hereby files its comments.
Document: 684721.doc - 147KO

2006-10-26 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description:  Pursuant to paragraph 23 of Telecom Public Notice 2006-12, as amended by Commission staff letter dated October 11, 2006, Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors) hereby file the attached submission.
Document: 683606.zip - 214KO

2006-10-26 - Union des consommateurs
Description: L'Union des consommateurs dépose le présent document afin de soumettre des observations dans le cadre de l'avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12.
Document: 683560.doc - 174KO

2006-10-26 - FCI Broadband
Description: FCI Broadband files these comments with the Commission pursuant to the procedures set out in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-16.
Document: 683577.zip - 103KO

2006-10-26 - Access Communications Co-operative Limited
Description: Access is pleased to provide comments in the above-referenced proceeding to consider whether the market-loss thresholds established in Telecom Decision 2006-15 continue to be appropriate and to also address the issue of whether mobile wireless services should be considered part of the same relevant market as wireless local exchange services.
Document: 683583.doc - 105KO

2006-10-26 - Execulink Group Inc.
Description: In PN 2006-12, the Commission invited comments regarding changes to market share loss thresholds established in Forbearance from the regulation of retail local exchange services, Telecom Decision 2006-15.
Document: 683581.pdf - 19KO

2006-10-26 - EastLink
Description: Bragg Communications carrying on business as EastLink, hereby files its comments on Public Notice 2006-12.
Document: 683593.pdf - 136KO

2006-10-26 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description:  The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the Consumer Groups) is pleased to enclose the Comments of the Consumer Groups in the above matter.
Document:  683917.zip - 261KO

2006-10-26 - Johnston and Buchan for UTC Canada
Description: Please find attached comments of UTC Canada regarding Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 - Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15.
Document: 683283.doc - 76KO

2006-10-26 - Canadian Cable Systems Alliance Inc. (CCSA)
Description: In PN 2006-12, the Commission invited comments regarding changes to the market share loss thresholds established in Forbearance from the regulation of retail local exchange services, Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Document: 683278.pdf - 163KO

2006-10-26 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description:  Le 1er septembre 2006, le Conseil publiait l'Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12.  Au paragraph 23 de cet Avis, le Conseil indiquait que toutes les parties peuvent déposer auprès du Conseil et en signifier copie à toutes les autres parties des observations sur les questions concernant la perte de part de marché.
Document:  683263.zip - 155KO

2006-10-26 - Vonage Canada Corp.
Description: These are the comments of Vonage Canada Corp. In response to Telecom Public Notice 2006-12.
Document: 683234.pdf - 3189KO

2006-10-19 - Westport Telephone Company Limited o/a WTC Communications (WTC)
Description: The Westport Telephone Company Limited o/a WTC Communications (WTC) wishes to thank the Commission for the opportunity to submit its comments on Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12.
Document: 681210.doc - 54KO

2006-10-18 - Wightman Communications Ltd.
Description:  Wightman supports the notion of market share forbearance criteria.  It also supports the creation of definition of Local Forbearance Regions (LFR).  Withtman supports these initiatives both both the residential and business markets.
Document: 680200.doc - 180KO

Section 4h) Répliques aux observations

2006-11-07 - Vonage Canada Corp.
Description: This the reply of Vonage Canada, pursuant to Public Notice 2006-12, 1 September 2006. In this reply, Vonage responds to the comments submitted by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications and TELUS Communications Company.
Document: 687443.pdf - 1241KO

2006-11-07 - Johnston & Buchan for UTC Canada
Description: These reply comments are filed by the United Telecom Council of Canada (UTC Canada) in accordance with the procedures established by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, as amended by the Commission’s letter to interested parties dated November 1, 2006
Document: 687435.doc - 59KO

2006-11-07 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the Consumer Groups) is pleased to enclose the Reply Comments of the Consumer Groups in the above matter.
Document: 687393.zip - 110KO

2006-11-07 - Access Communications Co-operative Limited
Description: Access Communications Co-operative Limited (Access Communications) is hereby filing its reply comments in the above-referenced proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Document:  687379.doc - 101KO

2006-11-07 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description:  Pursuant to paragraph 24 of Public Notice 2006-12, as amendedby the Commission Staff letters dated October 11, 2006 and November 1, 2006, the Competitors hereby file the attached Reply comments.
Document: 687372.zip - 89KO

Section 5) Réponses aux demandes de renseignements

2006-11-08 - EastLink
Description: Please find attached EastLink’s responses to EastLink (CRTC) 1Sept06-101, which was inadvertently not included in the interrogatories filed by EastLink on September 15, 2006.
Document: 687867.zip - 93KO

2006-10-27 - Bell Canada
Description:  Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-9, as amended by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 and further to Bell Canada's letters dated 15 September 2006, Bell Canada submit the attached revised interrogatories responses to the parties in this proceeding.
Document:  683923.zip - 37KO

2006-10-06 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers herewith files revised responses.
Document: 677550.zip - 60KO

2006-10-06 - Yak Communications (Canada) Inc.
Description: Yak Communications (Canada) Inc. (Yak) herewith is filing revised responses to interrogatory CRTC1Sept06-1.
Document: 676968.doc - 30KO

2006-10-05 - Bell Canada
Description:  Attached is a revised version of Attachment 1 to Bell Canada(CRTC)18Aug06-2 PN 2006-9. At Commission Staff's request the Company has provided additional information pertaining to the Atlantic Provinces.
Document: 675952.doc - 77KO

2006-09-29 - Comwave
Description:  In response to Commission's request for information, Comwave is hereby pleased to provide the attached responses to interrogatories.
Document: 675357.zip - 182KO

2006-09-29 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Cybersurf Corp. is submitting a revised abridged response to to interrogatory Cybersurf(CRTC)1Sept06-1 PN 2006-12 to the Commission and to interested parties.
Document: 674491.doc - 41KO

2006-09-28 - Vonage Canada Inc.
Description:  Further to the letter of 1 September 2006 from Scott Hutton, Vonage is pleased to provide the attached responses to interrogatory, requested by the Commission.
Document: 674473.pdf - 356KO

2006-09-29 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  This revised interrogatory response is filed in response to PN 2006-9 and related issues on behalf of TELUS Communications Company.
Document: 674249.zip - 35KO

2006-09-29 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description:  Rogers herewith files revisions to Attachment 2 to response to Rogers(CRTC)1Sept06-1 PN 2006-12
Document: 673851.pdf - 43KO

2006-09-29 - Bell Canada
Description:  Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-9, as amended by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, and further to Bell Canada's letters dated 15 September 2006, Bell Canada (or the Company) submits the attached interrogatory responses to the parties in this proceeding
Document: 673770.zip - 49KO

2006-09-28 - Yak Communications (Canada) Inc.
Description:  Further to the Commission's letter of 1 September 2006, Yak Communications is pleased to provide the attached responses to interrogatories.
Document:  673494.zip - 58KO

2006-09-28 - Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description:  In accordance with the procedures established in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-9 as amended in paragraph 21 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) submit the attached response to MTS Allstream' s request for disclosure and further information to The Companies(MTS Allstream)18Aug06-1 PN 2006-9 .
Document: 672991.zip - 128KO

2006-09-27 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description:  On September 15, 2006 , pursuant to the process established by the Commission in PN 2006-12, Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) submitted responses to interrogatories received from the Commission on September 1, 2006
Document: 673004.doc - 30KO

2006-09-26 - Quebecor Media on behalf of Videotron Ltd.
Description:  QMI, on behalf of itself and its subsidiary Videotron Ltd., is pleased to provide the enclosed revised responses to interrogatories received in the proceeding initiated by PN 2006-12.
Document: 672768.zip - 38KO

2006-09-25 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  Pursuant to the procedures set out in paragraph 19 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, and further to MTS Allstream Inc.'s (MTS Allstream) letter dated 15 September 2006, MTS Allstream submits its response to interrogatory, MTS Allstream(CRTC)1Sept06-1 PN2006-12 and submits a revision to interrogatory, MTS Allstream(CRTC)1Sept06-5 PN2006-12
Document: 672577.doc - 80KO

2006-09-22 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description:  Pursuant to paragraph 19 of PN 2006-12, and further to Rogers Communications Inc.'s letter dated September 15, 2006, Rogers is filing herewith through e-pass its responses to the interrogatories.
Document:  672150.zip - 95KO

2006-09-22 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description:  Pursuant to paragraph 14 of PN 2006-9, as amended by PN 2006-12, at paragraph 19, and further to Rogers Communications Inc.'s letter dated September 15, 2006, Rogers is filing herewith through e-pass its responses to the interrogatories.
Document: 671778.zip - 889KO

2006-09-22 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  Attached please find revised versions of TELUS Communications Company's interrogatory responses TELUS(CRTC)1Sept06-2 and TELUS(CRTC)1Sept06-5 in the proceeding initiated by PN 2006-12.
Document: 671743.zip - 55KO

2006-09-20 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in paragraph 19 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15 , and further to MTS Allstream Inc.'s (MTS Allstream) letter dated 15 September 2006, MTS Allstream submits responses to the following interrogatories:
Document: 668738.doc - 82KO

2006-09-19 - Access Communications Co-Operative Limited
Description: Please find attached the responses of Access Communications Co-operative Limited (Access Communications) to the Commission's interrogatories in the above-noted proceeding.   We apologize for the late filing of these responses.   The letter from Commission staff was inadvertently misplaced.   Given the nature of the questions asked by the CRTC, we do not believe that any party to this proceeding will suffer prejudice as a result of this filing.
Document: 669264.zip - 68KO

2006-09-18 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream inadvertently disclosed confidential information in response to MTS Allstream (CRTC)18Aug06-103 PN2006-9 in its electronic filing on 15 September 2006.   MTS Allstream requests that all parties destroy this version and replace it with the attached abridged version.   MTS Allstream apologizes for any confusion or inconvenience this may have caused.
Document: 669237.zip - 59KO

2006-09-17 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada hereby files the abridged versions of its interrogatory reponses in this proceeding. The confidential versions were filed under separate cover on 15 September 2006.
Document: 666759.zip - 58KO

2006-09-15 - Bragg Communications Inc., cob as EastLink
Description: Please find attached the ABRIDGED interrogatory responses of Bragg Communications Inc., cob as EastLink, re the above-noted matter. A confidential version has been filed separately with the Commission.
Document: 666974.zip - 31KO

2006-09-15 - Vonage Canada Inc.
Description: Further to the letter of I September 2006 from Scott Hutton, Vonage Canada Inc. ("Vonage
Canada") is pleased to provide the attached responses to interrogatories, requested by the
Commission.
Document: 666958.pdf - 347KO

2006-09-15 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedure established by the Commission in the above-noted public notice, Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus) hereby files its responses to the Commission’s interrogatories. Primus is filing portions of its responses to the following interrogatories in confidence with the Commission:
Document: 666745.doc -74KO

2006-09-15 - FCI Broadband
Description: Attached please find FCI Broadband’s responses to interrogatories of the CRTC dated 1 September 2006.
Document: 666735.pdf - 232KO

2006-09-15 - Wightman Communications Ltd.
Description: Attached herein are Wightman Communications Limited responses to those interrogatories posed by the Commission on September 1, 2006.
Document: 666642.zip - 170KO

2006-09-15 - Mountain Cablevision Ltd.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, please find attached the responses of Mountain Cablevision to the Commission's interrogatories.
Document: 665887.zip - 21KO

2006-09-15 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission in PN 2006-12, Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) is filing herewith through e-pass its response to interrogatory:
Document: 666445.zip - 389KO

2006-09-15 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: En accord avec la procédure établie par le Conseil dans l'Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12, Télébec, Société en commandite dépose, en annexe, les réponses aux demandes de renseignements du 1er septembre 2006.
Document: 666408.zip -73KO

2006-09-15 - Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of itself and its subsidiary Videotron Ltd.

2006-12-07 - Union des consommateurs
Description: La présente lettre vise à vous aviser que bien que la lettre accompagnant la demande d’adjudication des frais de l’Union des consommateurs pour sa participation à l’avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12 date du 13 novembre 2006, la demande a été transmise à toutes les parties intéressées par courriel ainsi qu’au CRTC le 5 décembre 2006.
Document: 699749.doc - 71KO

2006-11-13 - Union des consommateurs
Description: Conformément à l'article 44 des Règles de proceédure du CRTC et à l'avis public 2006-12, l'Union des consommateurs demande l'adjudication de ses frais pour sa participation à l'avis public 2006-12.
Document: 698647.pdf - 188KO

Section 8b) Autres

Aucun documents

Mise à jour : 2007-05-09

Date de modification :

2007-05-09