2001/10/31 - #: 8669-C12-01/01 - Avis public 2001-110 - Conditions deservice pour les entreprises de services locaux concurrentes sans fil et pourles services 9-1-1 offerts par des fournisseurs de services sans fil

2019-04-26 - Décisions de télécom 2019-120 - Groupe de travail Services d’urgence du CDCI – Rapport de consensus recommandant des mises à jour aux seuils d’exactitude de la localisation des appels au service 9-1-1 à partir d’appareils sans fil initialement approuvés dans la décision de télécom 2017-119 - Dossier public : 8669-C12-01/01

2014-08-06 - Ordonnances de télécom 2014-415 Groupe de travail Services d’urgence (GTSU) du CDCI – Rapport de consensus concernant les exigences quant à l’exactitude de la localisation pour la Phase II du service 9-1-1 évolué. Numéro de dossier : 8669-C12-01/01

2009-02-02 - Politique réglementaire de télécom 2009-40 - Mise en œuvre de la Phase II du service E911 sans fil
Numéro de dossier : 8638-C12-200314641 et 8669-C12-01/01

2003/09/25 - Décision de télécom CRTC 2003-53-1 Le Conseil publie l'annexe B révisée de la décision Conditions de service pour les entreprises de services locaux concurrentes sans fil et pour les services d'urgence offerts par les fournisseurs de services sans fil, Décision de télécom CRTC 2003-53, 12 août 2003. Référence : 8669-M16-01/01 et 8669-C12-01/01.

2003/08/12 - Décision de télécom CRTC 2003-53 Conditions de service pour les entreprises de services locaux concurrentes sans fil et pour les services d'urgence offerts par les fournisseurs de services sans fil. Référence : 8669-M16-01/01 et 8669-C12-01/01.

2002/04/24 - Ordonnnance de frais de Télécom CRTC 2002-5 Le Conseil approuve la demande d'Action Réseau Consommateur (ARC), l'Association des consommateurs du Canada, la Fédération des associations coopératives d'économie familiale et l'Organisation nationale anti-pauvreté (ARC et autres) pour une adjudication de frais concernant l'avis 2001-110. Conformément à l'article 56(1) de la Loi sur les télécommunications, le Conseil fixe à 1 394,66 $ le montant adjugé. Référence : 4754-204 et 8669-C12-01/01.

Référence : 8669-M16-01/01 - Microcell Telecommunications Inc. - Demandes pour obliger la fourniture du service d'accès au réseau 9-1-1 amélioré pour les fournisseurs de services sans fil


1. Documents du Conseil
2. Liste des parties intéressées
3. Correspondance au Conseil
4. Observations
5. Répliques aux observations
        Phase I
        Phase II
6. Documents divers

en haut


1. Documents du Conseil

2016-02-16 - Lettre du Conseil - Dossiers #: 8669-C12-01/01 et 8621-C12-01/08 - Description : Lettre adressée à la liste de distribution - Objet : Exigences quant à l’exactitude de la localisation pour la phase II du service 9-1-1 évolué sans fil

2015-07-27 - Lettre du Conseil
Dossier #: 8669-C12-01/01 & 8621-C12-01/08
Description : Lettre adressée à diverses parties - Objet : Exigences quant à l’exactitude de la localisation pour la phase II du service 9-1-1 évolué sans fil

2002/01/14 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à Parties intéressées à l'Avis public 2001-110 - Objet: Autre série d'observations en réplique concernant l'avis public 2001-110 intitulé Conditions de service pour les ESLC sans fil et pour les services 9-1-1 offerts par des FSSF

2001/12/24 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Dossiers #: 8661-C25-03/01, 8665-C12-13/01, 8669-C12-01/01, 8740-B2-6629/01
Lettre adressée à Bell Canada - Objet: La date pour la soumission des répliques aux observations est prolongée

2001/11/14 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Lettre adressée à TELUS Corporation - Bell Mobility, Rogers Wireless Inc. - Objet: Extension de la date limite pour la soumissions des mémoires pour l'Avis public 2001-110 - Conditions de service pour les entreprises de services locaux concurrentes sans fil et pour les services 9-1-1 offerts par des fournisseurs de services sans fil


3. Correspondance au Conseil

2003/07/24 - Industry Canada
Description:  Thank ou for your letter dated June 3, 2003 regarding 911 Cellular Telephone Service public safety concerns.
Document: 030724.pdf - 122KO

2003/03/13 - Ministry of Public Safety and Security
Description:  We urge the Commission to act swiftly on matters related to 9-1-1 wireless service identified under PN 2001-110.
Document: 030313.pdf - 50KO

2001/12/21 - Microcell Telecommunications Inc.
Microcell Telecommunications Inc. ("Microcell") is in receipt of Bell's correspondence to the Commission dated December 20, 2001, entitled "Early January Filing Deadlines".
Document: 011221.doc - 23KO

2001/12/20 - Bell Canada
In reviewing ongoing filing requirements, it has become apparent to the Company that it is faced with a number of filings in the week during which affected departments return to normal staffing levels following the holiday period.
Document: 011220_3.doc - KO

2001/11/09 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc. and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the Companies)
The Companies are in agreement with the observations of both RWI and Bell Mobility that Public Notice 2001-110 addresses two very complex issues and that interested parties will require additional time to analyze and formulate their positions.
Document:  011109_1.doc - 116KO

2001/11/07 - Bell Mobility
Bell Mobility is in receipt of a letter from Rogers Wireless Inc. (RWI), dated 6 November 2001, which expresses "serious concern" with the short timeframes that have been adopted by the Commission within the Notice and requests, in Bell Mobility's view.
Document: 011107.doc - 31KO

2001/11/06 - Rogers Wireless Inc.
Within the PN, the Commission has requested views regarding a number of complex issues regarding two very different matters: equal access arrangements for wireless competitive local exchange carriers ("CLECs"); and 9-1-1 arrangements for wireless CLECs and wireless service providers ("WSPs").
Document: 011106.doc - 34KO


4. Observations

2002/05/13 - Bell Canada
Bell Canada (or the Company) is in receipt of comments from Rogers Wireless Inc. (RWI), dated 2 May 2002, related to TELUS Communications Inc. (TCI) Tariff Notice No. 487 (TN 487) dated 2 April 2002.
Document: 020513.doc - 66KO

2002/05/09 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TCI is in receipt of comments from Rogers Wireless Inc. ("RWI"), dated May 2, 2002, regarding the Company's Tariff Notice No. 487 ("TN 487"), dated April 2, 2002.
Document : 020509.doc - 41KO

2002/05/02 - Rogers Wireless Inc.
Public Notice CRTC 2001-110 - RWI Comments.
Document: 020502.doc - 41KO

2002/01/28 - Greater Vancouver Regional District
This letter is submitted on behalf of the B.C. 9-1-1 Service Providers Association. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the various responses to Public Notice 2001-110.
Document: 020128.doc - 30KO

2002/01/25 - County of Oxford - "Version imprimée"
Oxford County Council, at its meeting held on January 23, 2002, endorsed the resolution from the County of Essex requesting Provincial and Federal government support in obtaining permission from the CRTC for the use of Bell Canada's data base for community emergency notification systems.

2002/01/23 - County of Elgin - "Version imprimée"
The Council of the Corporation of the County of Elgin, at its January 22, meeting, adopted the following resolution: "THAT the Council of the County of Elgin supports the resolution of the County of Essex requesting permission from the CRTC for use of Bell Canada's data base for community emergency notification systems".

en haut

2002/01/17 - Ville de Montréal et l'Union des municipalités du Québec (McCarthy Tétrault)
Suite à la procédure établie dans l'Avis public 2001-110, telle que modifiée par la lettre du Conseil le 24 décembre 2001, veuillez trouver ci-joint les observations en réplique déposées au nom de la Ville de Montréal et de l'Union des municipalités du Québec.
Document: 020117.zip - 15KO

2002/01/15 - Ontario Association of Fire Chiefs - "Version imprimée"
Pursuant to the procedure established in Public Notice 2001-110, attached are the Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board comments which the Ontario Association of Fire Chiefs endorses.

2002/01/11 - London Police - "Version imprimée"
The Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police, upon the advice of its Information and Technology Committee, strongly endorses the submission from the Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board related to the above-noted Public Notice.

2002/01/11 - Central York Fire Services - "Version imprimée"
As the representative on the Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board representing the Ontario Association of Fire Chiefs, I strongly endorse the position of the Board in their submission with respect to the above noted Public Notice.

2002/01/07 - Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police - "Version imprimée"
The Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police, upon the advice of their Information and Technology Committee, strongly endorse the submission from the Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board related to the above noted Public Notice.

2002/01/07 - York Regional Police - "Version imprimée"
York Regional Police will, in April take over complete responsibility for the initial handling of 9-1-1 emergency calls places in York Region.

2001/12/14 - TELUS Communications Inc.
These comments are being submitted by TELUS without prejudice to the further participation of the company in this proceeding.
Document: 011214.doc - 91KO

2001/12/14 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Comments of Primus Canada copied to Interested Parties PN CRTC 2001-110.
Document: 011214.doc - 55KO

2001/12/14 - The Companies
Further to the Commission's directives in Public Notice 2001-110 - Conditions of service for wireless competitive local exchange carriers and for 9-1-1 services offered by wireless service providers, the following comments are submitted on behalf of Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Northwestel Inc. and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the Companies).
Document: 011214.doc - 177KO

2001/12/14 - Alberta E9-1-1 Advisory Association (AEAA)
The Alberta E9-1-1 Advisory Association (AEAA) is filing the attached comments in relation to the above noted proceeding.
Document: 011214.doc - 83KO

en haut

2001/12/14 - Microcell Telecommunications Inc.
PN 2001-110: Comments submitted by Microcell Telecommunications on behalf of Microcell Connexions and Microcell Solutions.
Document: 011214.zip - 51KO

2001/12/14 - Rogers Wireless Inc.
Rogers Wireless Inc. ("RWI") is pleased to submit the following comments associated with Public Notice CRTC 2001-110 ("the PN").
Document: 011214.doc - 75KO

2001/12/14 - Communauté urbaine de Montréal et de l'Union des municipalités du Québec
La CUM et l'UMQ ont pris connaissance de l'Avis public CRTC 2001-110 et elles désirent fournir des observations sur les questions soulevées au paragraphe 16 de l'Avis public CRTC 2001-110.
Document: 011214.doc - 52KO

2001/12/14 - Bell Mobility
The following comments are filed by Bell Mobility pursuant to the procedure established by the Commission in: Conditions of service for wireless competitive local exchange carriers and for 9-1-1 services offered by wireless service providers, Public Notice 2001-110.
Document: 011214_2.doc - 53KO

2001/12/13 - ARC et al / PIAC
The following comments are provided by Action Réseau Consommateur, the Consumer's Association of Canada, and Fédération des Associations Coopératifs d'économie familiale ("ARC" et al") in response to the above-mentioned Public Notice
Document: 011213.doc - 38KO

2001/12/13 - Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board (OAB)
Comments from the OAB regarding Public Notice CRTC 2001-110.Conditions of service for wireless competitive local exchange carriers and for 9-1-1 services offered by wireless service providers
Document: 011213.doc - 49KO

2001/12/13 - Greater Vancouver Regional District
Here are the comments from the B.C. 9-1-1 Service Providers Association on CRTC Public Notice 2001-110.
Document: 011213.doc - 120KO

2001/12/05 - Corporation of the County of Essex - "Version imprimée"
The following resolution of Essex County Council's Government Services Committee, Planning and Emergency Services, was adopted by Council on November 21, 2001.

2001/12/05 - Corporation of the County Essex - "Version imprimée"
Essex County Council has identified a need for an emergency notification system in Essex County to inform residents as quickly as possible that an emergency situation exists, and to advise them of actions that should be taken under the circumstances.

en haut

2001/11/09 - TELUS Communications Inc.
TELUS is also in receipt of a letter from Rogers Wireless Inc. (RWI), dated 6 November 2001, which expresses "serious concern" with the short timeframes that have been adopted by the Commission within the Notice, requesting a very reasonable extension to the timeframes set out by the Commission in order to consider the very complex issues raised.
Document: 011109.doc - 62KO


5. Répliques aux observations

Phase II

2002/02/08 - Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board (OAB)
Please find attached the Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board response to correspondence submitted by Bell Mobility this date.
Document: 020208.doc - 26KO

2002/02/08 - Bell Mobility
Bell Mobility is in receipt of reply comments, in the above noted proceeding, from the Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board (OAB), dated 28 January 2002.
Document: 020208_3.doc - 26KO

2002/01/28 - Alberta E9-1-1 Advisory Association
The Alberta E9-1-1 Advisory Association (AEAA) is providing this letter in support of the Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board (OAB) January 28, 2002 reply comments submission.
Document: 020128.doc - 79KO

2002/01/28 - TELUS Communications Inc.
In accordance with the procedures set out in Public Notice CRTC 2001-110, and as amended in the Commission's letters with respect to this proceeding dated November 14, 2001, and January 14, 2002, TELUS Communications Inc. and TELE-MOBILE COMPANY (hereinafter collectively referred to as "TELUS") provide the following further Reply Comments in response to Reply Comments submitted January 17, 2002.
Document: 020128.doc - 88KO

2002/01/28 - Microcell Telecommunications Inc.
In accordance with the above-referenced Public Notice and subsequent Commission correspondence modifying filing dates and procedure, Microcell Telecommunications Inc. is pleased to submit the attached "Further Reply Comments" on behalf of both Microcell Connexions Inc. and Microcell Solutions Inc.
Document: 020128.zip - 17KO

en haut

2002/01/28 - Rogers Wireless Inc.
Rogers Wireless Inc. ("RWI") is pleased to submit the following additional reply comments associated with Public Notice CRTC 2001-110 ("the PN").
Document: 020128.doc - 43KO

2002/01/28 - Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board (OAB)
Pursuant to the procedure established in Public Notice 2001-110, attached are the Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board reply comments to submissions forwarded by other Interested Parties.
Document: 020128.doc - 70KO

2002/01/28 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Northwestel Inc. and Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Further to the Commission's directives in Public Notice 2001-110, Conditions of service for wireless competitive local exchange carriers and for 9-1-1 services offered by wireless service providers, and as amended by the subsequent email dated 14 January 2002, the following reply comments are submitted on behalf of Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Northwestel Inc., and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (including SaskTel Mobility), (collectively, the Companies).
Document: 020128_1.doc - 146KO

2002/01/28 - Ville de Montréal et de l'Union des municipalités du Québec (McCarthy Tétrault)
Suite à la procédure établie dans l'Avis public 2001-110, telle que modifiée par la lettre du Conseil le 24 décembre 2001, et par son courriel le 14 janvier 2002, veuillez trouver ci-joint les observations en réponse déposées au nom de la Ville de Montréal et de l'Union des municipalités du Québec.
Document: 020128.zip - 18KO

Phase I

2002/01/17 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Northwestel Inc., and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (including SaskTel Mobility)
Further to the Commission's directives in Public Notice 2001-110, Conditions of service for wireless competitive local exchange carriers and for 9-1-1 services offered by wireless service providers, the following reply comments are submitted on behalf of Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Northwestel Inc., and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (including SaskTel Mobility), (collectively, the Companies).
Document: 020117_1.doc - 179KB

2002/01/17 - Alberta E9-1-1 Advisory Association (AEAA)
The Alberta E9-1-1 Advisory Association (AEAA) is providing this letter in support of the Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board (OAB) January 17, 2002 reply comments submission.
Document: 020117.doc - 218KB

2002/01/17 - Microcell Telecommunications Inc.
In accordance with the above-referenced Public Notice and subsequent Commission correspondence modifying filing dates, Microcell Telecommunications Inc. is pleased to submit the attached reply comments on behalf of both Microcell Connexions Inc. and Microcell Solutions Inc.
Document: 020117.zip - 55KO

2002/01/17 - Rogers Wireless Inc.
Rogers Wireless Inc. ("RWI") is pleased to submit the following reply comments associated with Public Notice CRTC 2001-110 ("the PN").
Document: 020117.zip - 31KO

en haut

2002/01/17 - Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board (OAB)
Pursuant to the procedure established in Public Notice 2001-110, appended are the Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board reply comments to date.
Document: 020117.zip - 865KO

2002/01/17 - Bell Mobility
The following reply comments are filed by Bell Mobility pursuant to the procedure established by the Commission in: Conditions of service for wireless competitive local exchange carriers and for 9-1-1 services offered by wireless service providers, Public Notice 2001-110, 31 October 2001 (the Notice) and as further modified in the Commission's letter of 14 November 2001.
Document: 020117.doc - 37KO

2002/01/17 - TELUS Communications Inc.
In accordance with the procedures set out in Public Notice CRTC 2001-110, and as amended in the Commission's letter with respect to this proceeding dated November 14, 2001, TELUS Communications Inc. and TELE-MOBILE COMPANY (hereinafter collectively referred to as "TELUS") provide the following Reply Comments.
Document: 020117.doc - 90KO

2002/01/07 - ARC et al
On behalf of ARC et al, we are in receipt of comments in this proceeding from The Companies, TELUS, Primus, Bell Mobility, Rogers Wireless, Microcell, Alberta #911 Advisory Association, BC 911 Service Providers Association, Ontario 911 Advisory Board, and la Communauté urbaine de Montréal et de l'Union des municipalités du Quebéc. The following are ARC et al's reply comments.
Document: 020107.doc - 32KO


6. Documents divers

2002/02/13 - Microcell Telecommunications Inc.
Microcell Telecommunications Inc. ("Microcell") is in receipt of a letter from Bell Canada, on behalf of itself, Aliant Telecom Inc., MTS Communications Inc. and Saskatchewan Telecommunications Inc. ("Bell et al") dated February 8 regarding the above noted Application for Costs.
Document: 020213.doc - 28KO

2002/02/08 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., and Saskatchewan Telecommunications Inc.
Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., and Saskatchewan Telecommunications Inc. (collectively, the Companies) have received the application for costs of ARC et al in the above noted proceeding, by letter dated 31 January 2002.
Document: 020208_2.doc - 117KO

2002/02/04 - Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association
The Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association ("CWTA") is in receipt of an application for Costs (the "Application") dated January 31, 2002, filed pursuant to s.44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, and Public Notice CRTC 98-11 by Action Réseau Consommateur, the Consumers' Association of Canada, and Fédération des Associations Coopératifs d'économie familiale ("ARC et al").
Document : 020204.doc - 39KO

2002/01/31 - ARC et al
Description : Action Réseau Consommateur, the Consumers' Association of Canada, and Fédération des Associations Coopératifs d'économie familiale ("ARC et al") hereby apply for an award of costs to cover their participation in this proceeding.
Document: 020131.doc - 31KO

Date de modification :