Telecom Notice of Consultation 2013-155
2013-03-27 - #: 8665-C12-201303563
Issues related to the feasibility of establishing a video relay service


Relevant documents submitted as part of the proceeding initiated by Broadcasting notice of Public Hearing 2008-8 and Telecom Public Notice 2008-8

2008-06-10 - File #: 8665-C12-200807943 - Broadcasting Notice of Public Hearing 2008-8 - Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-8 - Unresolved issues related to the accessibility of telecommunications and broadcasting services to persons with disabilities


List of Related Documents

Section 1 - Commission Documents

  1. Letter to Distribution List - Provision of Relay Services (2008-12-19)
  2. Letter to TELUS Communications Company (2012-05-25)
  3. Letter to Distribution List (2012-05-25)
  4. Letter to Bell Canada (2012-05-25)
  5. Letter to Bell Canada (2012-06-22)
  6. Letter to TELUS Communications Company (2012-08-17)
  7. Letter to MTS Allstream (2012-08-17)
  8. Letter to Rogers Communications (2012-08-17)
  9. Letter to Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (2012-08-17)

Section 2 - Correspondence to CRTC

2012-09-12 - Sorenson Communications Canada
Description: I am writing on behalf of my client Sorenson Communications Canada with respect to the above-referenced proceeding.
Document: 1763217.zip - 164KB

2012-09-07 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: On August 17, 2012, Rogers Communications (Rogers) received two follow-up interrogatories to the interrogatories received from the CRTC on May 25, 2012 on the above noted Public Notice. The attached responses are submitted on behalf of Rogers Communications Inc. (which includes Rogers Home Phone), Rogers Wireless Partnership (which includes Chatr Wireless), and Fido Solutions Inc.
Document: 1761203.zip - 48KB

2012-09-07 - MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc. (collectively, MTS Allstream) are hereby providing a response to the 17 August 2012 Commission staff request for information seeking further clarification on certain of MTS Allstream’s responses to the 25 May 2012 Commission staff requests for information regarding MTS Allstream’s Message TTY and IP Relay service (MRS).
Document: 1761189.zip - 178KB

2012-09-07 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to Commission staff's letter of 17 August 2012, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada, and Télébec, Société en commandite (Télébec) (collectively, the Companies) are submitting supplemental responses to the Commission's requests for responses.
Document: 1761143.zip - 166KB

2012-08-30 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) is in receipt of a letter issued by Commission staff on August 17, 2012 as a follow-up to the Company’s responses filed with the Commission on July 26, 2012. These responses were filed in relation to interrogatories issued by Commission staff on May 25, 2012 on the use, cost and rates of IP Relay and TTY relay service (“MRS services”).
Document: 1758649.pdf - 74KB

2012-07-27 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 25 May 2012, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby submits the attached responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC.
Document: 1744615.zip - 202KB

2012-07-26 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or “the Company”) is in receipt of interrogatories issued by Commission staff on May 25, 2012 in relation to the above-noted proceeding. In accordance with the instructions of Commission staff, TELUS files its responses to the interrogatories posed.
Document: 1744593.zip - 564KB

2012-07-26 - Northwestel Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission’s letter dated May 25th 2012 and the amended procedural letter dated June 22, 2012, Northwestel provides the following responses to the Commission’s interrogatories.
Document: 1744582.pdf - 123KB

2012-07-26 - Bragg Communications Inc. (EastLink)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., carrying on business as Eastlink (“Eastlink”), is hereby providing its responses to interrogatories submitted by the Commission on 25 May 2012, with deadline extension for filing responses granted via 22 June 2012 Commission letter.
Document: 1744542.zip - 278KB

2012-07-26 - Shaw Telecom G.P. (Shaw)
Description: Pursuant to Commission letter dated 25 May 2012, Shaw Telecom G.P. (Shaw)
herein files its responses to the Commission’s interrogatories.
Document: 1743969.zip - 254KB

2012-07-26 - Québecor Média, au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron
Description: Conformément aux directives du Conseil énoncées dans ses lettres du 25 mai et du 22 juin 2012, Québecor Média, au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron, soumet par la présente ses
réponses à des demandes de renseignements.
Document: 1743951.pdf - 345KB

2012-07-26 - MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc. (collectively, MTS Allstream) are hereby providing responses to the 25 May 2012 Commission staff requests for information regarding MTS Allstream’s Message TTY and IP Relay service (MRS).
Document: 1743926.zip - 432KB

2012-07-26 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, société en commandite
Description: Pursuant to the process set out in the Commission's letter of 22 June 2012, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada and Télébec, société en commandite (Télébec) (collectively, the Companies), are hereby providing their responses to the requests for information from the Commission in their letter of 25 May 2012, related to the Message Relay Service (MRS) and Internet Protocol Relay Service (IPRS) provided by the Companies.
Document: 1743796.zip - 470KB

2012-07-26 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in a Commission staff letter dated 25 May 2012, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) hereby files its responses to interrogatories posed by the Commission.
Document: 1743781.zip - 145KB

2012-07-26 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: In accordance with procedures set out by the Commission in the above noted Public Notice, Rogers Communications (Rogers) submits the attached responses to the interrogatories received from the CRTC on May 25, 2012. The Commission subsequently granted a filing extension to July 26, 2012, in a letter dated June 22, 2012. This filing is submitted on behalf of Rogers Communications Inc. (which includes Rogers Home Phone), Rogers Wireless Partnership (which includes chatr Wireless), and Fido Solutions Inc.
Document: 1743742.pdf - 123KB


Section 3 - Responses to questions

2012-06-26 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) is in receipt of interrogatories issued by Commission staff on May 25, 2012 regarding TELUS’ video relay services (“VRS”) trial. In accordance with the instructions of Commission staff, TELUS files its responses to the VRS interrogatories posed.
Document: 1732471.zip - 1313KB


Section 4 - Others

2011-03-01 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS hereby files a report on the first portion of its video relay services (“VRS”) trial and requests the approval from the Commission that the total duration of the trial be extended from a 12-month period to a 18-month period. This would mean that the VRS would be extended to January 15, 2012.
Document: 1524627.zip - 159KB

2011-07-29 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS hereby files a second confidential report with the Commission after the completion of 12 months of its video relay services (“VRS”) trial.
Document: 1596144.pdf - 76KB


Section 5 - Exhibits and responses to undertakings

2009-02-03 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: In its response to SASKTEL(CRTC)19DEC08-502 PN 2008-8, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) inadvertently failed to account for all types of service options that are provided in addition to its basic TTY to operator Message Relay Service. Accordingly, SaskTel submits the attached revision to that interrogatory response.
Document: 1018288.zip - 50KB

2009-02-02 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: On 27 January 2009 , MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) filed its responses to the Commission's PN 2008-8 interrogatories dated 19 December 2008. In its response to MTS Allstream(CRTC)19Dec08-503 PN 2008-8, MTS Allstream inadvertently released the names of the telecommunications service providers to whom it provides message relay service on a wholesale basis.
Document: 1017618.zip - 110KB

2009-01-27 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with procedures set out by the Commission in the above noted Public Notices, Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) submits the attached response to the interrogatories received from the CRTC on December 2, 2008.
Document: 1014704.zip - 308KB - 1014704txt - 4KB

2009-01-27 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) hereby submits its responses to the interrogatories issued by the Commission on 19 December 2008 in the proceeding initiated by Broadcasting Notice of Public Hearing CRTC 2008-8 and Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-8, Unresolved issues related to the accessibility of telecommunications and broadcasting services to persons with disabilities , 10 June 2008 (PN 2008-8).
Document: 1014583.zip - 154KB

2009-01-26 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw), on behalf of Shaw Telecom Inc. (Shaw Telecom) is providing these confidential responses to the interrogatories regarding Message Relay Services (MRS), received by Shaw on December 19, 2008.
Document: 1014990.doc - 106KB

2009-01-26 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedures as set out by Commission staff, TELUS Communications Company ("TELUS") files its responses to interrogatories issued by the Commission on December 19, 2008.
Document: 1014303.zip - 77KB - 1014303txt - 10KB

2009-01-26 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: En accord avec la procédure établie par le Conseil de la radiodiffusion et des télécommunications canadiennes ("le Conseil") dans le dossier amorcé par l’Avis public de télécom CRTC 2008-8 ("l’Avis 2008-8"), Télébec, Société en commandite ("Télébec") dépose, sous-pli, ses réponses aux demandes de renseignements du 19 décembre 2008.
Document: 1014292.zip - 205KB

2009-01-26 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter of 19 December 2008, as amended by its letter of 9 January 2009 , Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits its responses to the Commission's interrogatories. Responses to the following interrogatories are provided in confidence to the Commission for the reasons cited in the interrogatory responses.
Document: 1014278.zip - 98KB

2009-01-26 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the directive specified in the Commission staff letter dated 19 December 2008, as amended by the Commission staff letter dated 7 January 2009, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) on behalf of Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. submits its responses to the CRTC interrogatories regarding Message Relay Services (MRS).
Document: 1014274.pdf - 30KB

2009-01-26 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (The Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the Commission's letter dated 19 December 2008, as modified in its letter of 7 January 2009, the attached responses to the Commission's interrogatories are submitted by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies). Where applicable, the responses include the requested information for Virgin Mobile Canada as well.
Document: 1013488.zip - 108KB - 1013488txt - 15KB

2009-01-26 - QMI, au nom de ses filiales Vidéotron et le Groupe TVA
Description: QMI, au nom de ses filiales Vidéotron ltée («Vidéotron») et le Groupe TVA inc. («TVA») accuse réception d'une lettre du 19 décembre 2009 eu égard à l'instance susmentionnée en objet et portant sur une troisième série de questions. Veuillez trouver ci-dessous nos réponses.
Document: 1014127.doc - 455KB

Date modified: