2006-05-09 - #: 8678-C12-200605553 - Public Notice 2006-5 - Review of price cap framework

File using the On-line Services


Public Notice 2006-5 Schedule

Activities

 Deadline Dates

Notice of intention to participate 2006-06-09
Public Hearing 2006-10-10
Notice of intention to participate at the oral hearing from interested parties 2006-08-11
Responses to Commission's interrogatories 2006-07-10
Evidence 2006-07-10
Interrogatories 2006-08-08
Responses to interrogatories 2006-09-06
Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure 2006-09-13
Responses to request for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure 2006-09-20
Information to be filed pursuant to determination 2006-10-04
Comments 2006-10-26
Arguments 2006-10-26
Reply arguments 2006-11-06

List of Related Documents

Section 1 - Commission Documents
a) Public Notices, Decisions, etc.
b) List of Interested Parties
c) Correspondence to Parties
d) Interrogatories

Section 2 - Documents from Aliant Telecom, Bell Canada, MTS Allstream, SaskTel and TCC
a) Correspondence to the Commission
b) Evidence
c) Interrogatories
d) Request for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure
e) Information to be filed pursuant to determination
f)  Arguments
g) Reply arguments

Section 4 - Documents from parties
a) Correspondence to the Commission
b) Evidence
c) Interrogatories
d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure
e) Information to be filed pursuant to determination
f) Arguments
g) Reply arguments
h) Comments

Section 5 - Responses to Interrogatories

Section 6 - Exhibits and responses to undertakings posed at the public hearing

Section 7 - Transcripts

Section 8 - Miscellaneous Documents
a) Costs
b) Others


Section 1a) Public Notices, Decisions, etc.

2007-04-30 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27 Price cap framework for large incumbent local exchange carriers. Reference: 8678-C12-200605553.

2007-04-05 - Teleocm Cost Order CRTC 2007-6 The Commission approves in part the application for costs by British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the British Columbia Old Age Pensioners' Organization, Active Support Against Poverty, BC Coalition of People with Disabilities, Council of Senior Citizens' Organizations of BC, Federated Anti-Poverty Groups of BC, End Legislated Poverty, and the Tenants' Rights Action Coalition with respect to their participation in the proceeding initiated by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5. Reference: 8678-C12-200605553 an

2007-03-14 - Telecom Cost Order CRTC 2007-5 The Commission approves the application for costs by Public Interest Law Centre on behalf of Consumers Association of Canada (Manitoba Branch), Manitoba Society of Seniors, and Manitoba Keewatinook Ininew Okimowin with respect to their participation in their proceeding initiated by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006‑5. Reference: 8678‑C12‑200605553 and 4754‑282.

2007-03-14 - Telecom Cost Order CRTC 2007-4 The Commission approves the application for costs by l'Union des consommateurs with respect to its participation in the proceeding initiated by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006‑5. Reference: 8678‑C12‑200605553 and 4754‑284.

2007-03-14 - Telecom Cost Order CRTC 2007-3 The Commission approves the application for costs by Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumer Groups with respect to its participation in the proceeding initiated by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006‑5. Reference: 8678‑C12‑200605553 and 4754‑286.


Section 1c) Correspondence to Parties

2007-03-13 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Interested Parties to PN 2006-5 - Re: Review of price cap frameword, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5, 9 May 2006 - Extension for the 2007 annual price cap filings

2006-10-06 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Parties to Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 - Re: Commission Determinations with respect to the scope of the proceeding

2006-09-27 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to MTS Allstream Inc. - Re: Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 - Review of price cap framework - Request by MTS Allstream Inc. to exclude the treatment of Competitor Services from the scope of the proceeding

2006-09-27 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Interested Parties to PN 2006-5 - Re: Organization and conduct of the oral hearing

2006-08-21 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Interested Parties, Review of price cap framework, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 - Re: Review of price cap framework, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5, 9 May 2006 - Information required regarding the oral hearing

2006-06-20 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Parties to Public Notice 2006-5 - Re: Request to modify the process in Public Notice 2006-5


Section 1d) Interrogatories

2006-10-06 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to MTS Allstream Inc. - Re: Review of price cap framework, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 - Additional Interrogatories

2006-10-06 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"

Description: Letter addressed to Public Interest Advocacy Centre - Re: Review of price cap framework, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 - Additional Interrogatories

2006-10-04 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Review of price cap framework, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 - 9 May 2006 - Interrogatory MTS Allstream(ConsumerGroups)8Aug06-15

2006-09-29 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to the Distribution List - Re: Review of price cap framework, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5, 9 May 2006 - Requests for disclosure and for further responses to interrogatories

2006-09-29 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re: Review of price cap framework, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5, Additional interrogatories

2006-09-29 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Cogeco Cable Canada Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. - Re: Review of price cap framework, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 - Additional interrogatories

2006-09-29 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Public Interest Advocacy Centre - Re: Review of price cap framework, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 - Additional interrogatories

2006-09-29 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Quebecor Media Inc.- Re: Review of price cap framework, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 - Additional interrogatories

2006-09-29 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to MTS Allstream Inc. - Re: Review of price cap framework, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5, Additional interrogatories

2006-09-29 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to TELUS Communications Company - Re: Review of price cap framework - Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 - Additional Interrogatories

2006-08-08 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to TELUS Communications Company - Re: Review of price cap framework - Telecom Public Notice 2006-5 - Interrogatories

2006-08-08 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Cogeco Cable Canada Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. - Re: Review of price cap framework - Telecom Public Notice 2006-5 - Interrogatories

2006-08-08 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to EastLink Telephone - Re: Review of price cap framework - Telecom Public Notice 2006-5 - Interrogatories

2006-08-08 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to MTS Allstream Inc. - Re: Review of price cap framework - Telecom Public Notice 2006-5 - Interrogatories

2006-08-08 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Public Interest Advocacy Centre - Re: Review of price cap framework - Telecom Public Notice 2006-5 - Interrogatories

2006-08-08 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Quebecor Media Inc. - Re: Review of price cap framework - Telecom Public Notice 2006-5 - Interrogatories

2006-08-08 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re: Review of price cap framework - Telecom Public Notice 2006-5 - Interrogatories

2006-05-24 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Saskatchewan Telecommunications - Re: Review of Price cap Framework: Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 - Initial Interrogatories

2006-05-24 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to MTS Allstream Inc. - Re: Review of Price cap Framework: Telecom Public Notice CRTC2006-5 - Initial Interrogatories

2006-05-24 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Aliant Telecom Inc. - Re: Review of Price cap Framework: Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 - Initial Interrogatories

2006-05-24 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re: Review of Price cap Framework: Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 - Initial Interrogatories

2006-05-24 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to TELUS Communications Company - Re: Review of Price cap Framework: Telecom Public Notice CRTC2006-5 - Initial Interrogatories


Section 2a) Correspondence to the Commission

2006-10-26 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: With respect to the Commission's undertaking to TELUS Communications Company ("TELUS" or the "Company") marked as UNDERTAKING CRTC-12 , the Company is currently assessing the impact of the proposed income trust conversion on the appropriateness of various financial analysis parameters.
Document: 683687.pdf - 20KB  

2006-10-10 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the Commission letter of 4 October 2006 MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) hereby files its comments regarding the Consumer Groups' request that MTS Allstream disclose confidential information contained in interrogatory MTS Allstream(Consumers Group)8Aug06-15 PN 2006-5 (Interrogatory 15) to the Consumer Groups, subject to a non-disclosure agreement.
Document: 677285.doc - 86KB

2006-10-10 - Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to Commission staff's request in its 4 October 2006 letter addressed to interested parties to PN 2006-5, Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) are providing their views on the issues detailed by the Commission
Document: 677142.doc - 70KB

2006-10-10 - Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) are submitting the attached revised curriculum vita of Peter Dilworth, Vice-President - Finance (Bell Aliant), who is part of the Companies' witness panel.
Document: 677041.doc - 95KB

2006-10-06 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company ("TELUS") has received a copy of the letter to the Commission from counsel for the Consumer Groups dated 4 October 2006 asking the Commission to clarify whether the terms of reference for this proceeding include a review of forbearance conditions.
Document: 676766.doc - 45KB

2006-10-05 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company ("TELUS" or the "Company") is in receipt of a letter from the Commission dated 21 August 2006. In that letter, the Commission indicated that parties who have filed (or are filing) evidence and who intend to call witnesses should provide a list of the witnesses they intend to call, indicating: i) the subject matter of each witness' testimony; (ii) the evidence and interrogatory responses for which each witness is responsible; and (iii) the order in which it is proposed that the witnesses will be presented.
Document: 676268.zip - 131KB

2006-10-05 - Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter dated 27 September 2006 , Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) attach as exhibits the curricula vitae of the following witnesses
Document: 676137.doc - 156KB

2006-10-05 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission letter dated 27 September 2006 , MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) advises the Commission that Mr. Michael Koch of Goodmans LLP will be appearing as MTS Allstream's Legal Counsel during the hearing scheduled for 1 October 2006 to 20 October 2006.
Document: 675975.doc - 104KB

2006-10-05 - Bell Canada
Description:
Bell Canada is in receipt of a letter from counsel for the Consumer Groups dated 4 October 2006, asking the Commission to clarify "whether the changes that are to be considered to the price cap regime include a review of the forbearance conditions associated with the services to be capped" and "what constitutes the other forms of regulation that paragraph 24 of the Public Notice seeks to prohibit".
Document: 675852.doc - 67KB

2006-09-28 - MTS Allstream Inc .
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the Commission staff letter dated 21 August 2006 , MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) hereby advises of its intent to make one witness panel available for cross-examination, consisting of the following individuals:
Document: 672954.doc - 84KB

2006-09-22 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (the “Company”) hereby notifies the Commission of its intention to cross examine the witness made available by l’Union des consommateurs (in addition to the witness panels identified for cross examination by the Company in its letter dated 14 September 2006).
Document: 670134.pdf - 21KB

2006-09-21 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) wishes to inform the Commission that due to scheduling issues, some of TELUS’ witnesses will not be available after 13 October 2006. TELUS respectfully requests that the Commission take this into account when developing the order of appearance for parties at the oral hearing.
Document: 669689.pdf - 21KB

2006-09-18 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) Bell Canada, and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of a letter dated 14 September 2006 from l'Union des consommateurs wherein l'Union des consommateurs indicates that it intends to make available one witness for cross-examination.   The Companies hereby advise that they intend to cross-examine this witness.
Document: 668541.doc - 62KB

2006-09-14 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In response to the Commission’s 21 August 2006 letter, TELUS Communications Company hereby notifies the Commission and parties of its intention to cross examine the witness panels made available by the City of Calgary, the Competitors (Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc.), the Consumer Groups (the Consumers’ Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization) and MTS Allstream.
Document: 666830.pdf - 21KB

2006-09-13 - MTS Allstream
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 21 August 2006, MTS Allstream advises that it intends to cross-examine the witnesses identified by the following parties in their letters dated 8 September 2006.
Document: 665260.pdf - 109KB

2006-09-13 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Document: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) Bell Canada, and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of letters from Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Competitors), the Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization (collectively, the Consumer Groups), MTS Allstream, TELUS Communications Company and The City of Calgary indicating their intention to make available witnesses at the oral hearing.
Document: 665227.doc - 70KB

2006-09-12 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  In response to the Commission's 21 August 2006 letter, TELUS Communications Company hereby notifies the Commission and parties of its intention to present oral final argument.
Document: 664546.pdf - 21KB

2006-09-08 - Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in the Commission's 21 August 2006 letter, Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) hereby advise that they intend to make one witness panel available for cross-examination, consisting of the following individuals.
Document: 667958.doc - 69KB

2006-09-08 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company ("TELUS" or the "Company") is in receipt of a letter from the Commission dated 21 August 2006 .   In that letter, the Commission indicated that parties who have filed (or are filing) evidence and who intend to call witnesses should provide a list of the witnesses they intend to call, indicating: i) the subject matter of each witness' testimony; (ii) the evidence and interrogatory responses for which each witness is responsible; and (iii) the order in which it is proposed that the witnesses will be presented.
Document: 665488.doc - 45KB

2006-09-08 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: The Commission in a letter dated 21 August 2006, requested those parties intending to call witnesses to provide a list of the witnesses and indicate the subject matter, evidence and interrogatories the witnesses will speak to.
Document: 663090.pdf - 112KB

2006-09-06 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: These reply comments are filed by MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) in response to comments filed by TELUS Communications Company (TELUS) on 25 August 2006 and by Bell Canada , Bell Aliant and SaskTel (Bell et al.) on 28 August 2006
Document: 663085.doc - 100KB

2006-09-01 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the Commission's 21 August 2006 letter, Bell Canada, Bell Aliant, Regional Communications Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) hereby advise that the Companies intend to present oral final argument.
Document: 661672.doc - 62KB

2006-08-30 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: The following are the comments of TELUS Communications Company ("TELUS") on the letter of Bell Aliant, Bell Canada and SaskTel ("the Companies") dated 11 August 2006 . The Companies say that the Consumer Groups should not be permitted to file an update to the evidence prepared by Dr. Roycroft filed in this proceeding, and ask the Commission to make an order accordingly. The Consumer Groups responded to the Companies' letter on 21 August 2006.
Document: 659694.pdf - 25KB

2006-08-28 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Bell Canada, on behalf of itself, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) is in receipt of MTS Allstream's 21 August 2006 letter requesting that the Commission issue a declaratory ruling that excludes all issues relating to the regulatory treatment of Competitor Services and strikes all submissions that have been made on these issues from the record of the proceeding.
Document: 659053.doc - 71KB

2006-08-25 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: This constitutes the answer of Telus Communications Company to the application made by MTS Allstream Inc. dated 21 August 2006. MTS Allstream seeks a declaratory ruling excluding all issues relating to the regulatory treatment of Competitor Services from the scope of the proceeding initiated by Review of Price Cap Framework, Telecom Public Notice 2006-5.
Document: 659527.pdf - 1,695KB

2006-08-21 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: This is a request by MTS Allstream Inc. seeking a declaratory ruling from the Commission that excludes all issues relating to the regulatory treatment of Competitor Services from the scope of the proceeding initiated by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 and strikes all submissions that have been made on this issue from the record of the same proceeding.
Document: 656786.pdf - 1,508KB

2006-08-11 - Bell Canada
Description: Bell Canada, on behalf of itself, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) note that at paragraph 6 of the 10 July 2006 evidence submitted by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), on behalf of the Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization, (hereinafter the Consumer Groups) in the proceeding initiated by PN 2006-5, Dr. Trevor Roycroft indicates that "the Consumer Groups intend to seek [additional data] during the discovery process" that will allow Dr. Roycroft "to fully evaluate and respond to the Commission's requests.
Document: 654831.doc - 73KB

2006-08-10 - Bell Canada
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 40 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5, Review of price cap framework , Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the Companies) hereby provide notice of their intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence on 10 October 2006.
Document: 654953.doc - 63KB

2006-08-09 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  Pursuant to paragraph 40 of the above-noted public notice, MTS Allstream intends to participate in the oral hearing scheduled for 10 October 2006.
Document: 652711.pdf - 92KB

2006-05-24 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TCC is in receipt of a letter from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of the Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization (Consumer Groups), dated 17 May 2006, requesting that the Commission modify the process and timetable for PN 2006-5.
Document: 629122.pdf - 27KB

2006-05-24 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) has received a letter, dated 17 May 2006, from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumers’ Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization (collectively, the Consumer Groups) requesting that the Commission reconsider and revise the Procedure and time table of the above Subject proceeding.
Document: 629026.doc - 57KB

2006-05-24 - Aliant Telecom Inc. and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc. and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of a letter from the Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization (collectively, the Consumer Groups) dated 17 May 2006 requesting amendments to the procedures set out in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 (PN 2006-5).
Document:  628938.doc - 234KB


Section 2b) Evidence

2006-07-10 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS herewith files its comments and responses to interrogatories in accordance with the procedure established by the Commission in PN 2006-5
Document: 643246.zip - 424KB

2006-07-10 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: In accordance with the procedures outlined at paragraphs 32 and 33 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 (PN 2006-5), Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada, and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) are filing their evidence and responses to the Commission interrogatories received 24 May 2006
Document: 643198.zip - 938KB (revised)

2006-07-10 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  Pursuant to paragraph 33 of the procedures established in the above-noted public notice, MTS Allstream Inc. submits the attached comments
Document: 643074.doc - 264KB


Section 2c) Interrogatories

2006-08-08 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  In accordance with paragraph 34 of Telecom Public Notice 2006-5, MTS Allstream Inc. submit the following interrogatories.
Document: 652084.pdf - 2312KB

2006-08-08 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description:  In accordance with paragraph 34 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 (PN 2006-5), Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell   Canada , and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) submit the attached interrogatories to parties to this proceeding.
Document: 652669.zip - 73KB (revised)


2006-08-08 - TELUS Communications Company

Description: In accordance with the procedures set out by the Commision in PN 2006-5, please find attached interrogatories from TELUS Communications Company addressed to the Consumer Groups, CAC Manitoba and MTS Allstream.
Document: 652054.pdf - 26KB


Section 2d) Request for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure

2006-09-13 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures identified at paragraph 36 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5, Review of price cap framework, MTS Allstream Inc. submits the following requests for public disclosure and further responses to the interrogatories identified in the Attachment.
Document: 665301.pdf - 748KB

2006-09-13 - TELU Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out by the Commission in Review of price cap framework, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 (“PN 2006-5”), TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) hereby files the following requests for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed. TELUS’ requests concern MTS Allstream’s response to interrogatory MTS Allstream(TELUS)8Aug06-1.
Document: 665248.pdf - 32KB

2006-09-13 - Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Document: Pursuant to the procedures set out in paragraph 36 of PN 2006 5, Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) submit their requests for further responses in the Attachment.
Document: 665183.doc - 70KB


Section 2e) Information to be filed pursuant to determination

No documents


Section 2f) Arguments

2006-10-26 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company herewith files its written Final Argument.
Document: 683803.zip - 391KB

2006-10-26 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: In accordance with paragraph 42 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5, Review of price cap framework, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the Companies) are hereby filing their final argument in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 683757.zip - 174KB

2006-10-26 - MTS Allstream Inc .
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 42 of the procedures established in the above noted public notice, MTS Allstream Inc.(MTS Allstream) submits the attached final arguments.
Document: 683378.doc - 231KB

Section 2g) Reply arguments

2006-11-07 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  TELUS Communications Company is herewith filings its Reply Argument.
Document: 686920.zip - 152KB

2006-11-06 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  Pursuant to the procedures established in the above-noted public notice, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the attached reply argument
Document: 686909.doc - 197KB

2006-11-06 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: In accordance with paragraph 43 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5, Review of price cap framework , Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the Companies) are hereby filing their reply argument in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 686878.zip - 66KB



Section 4a) Correspondence to the Commission

2006-10-11 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: As counsel to the Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization, (hereinafter "the Consumer Groups") we are pleased to respond to the Commission's letter of 4 October 2006 regarding disclosure of the information in this interrogatory in confidence to the Consumer Groups.
Document: 677520.doc - 128KB

2006-10-05 - Quebecor Media Inc.
Description: In accordance with the Commission's procedural letter of 27 September 2006 regarding the PN 2006-5 oral hearing, please find attached as exhibits the curricula vitae of the witnesses of The Competitors.   You will note that Michel Messier (Director, Regulatory Affairs, Telecommunications, Cogeco Cable Inc.) has replaced Yves Mayrand as one of The Competitors' witnesses.
Document: 675979.zip - 38KB

2006-10-04 - Union des Consommateurs
Description: Vous trouverez, en pièce jointe, le curriculum vitae du témoin que l'Union des consommateurs a l'intention d'appeler dans le cadre de l'audience relative à l'avis public de télécom 2006-5.
Document: 675682.doc - 39KB

2006-10-04 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: In preparation for the commencement of the oral phase of this proceeding, the Consumer Groups would note that it would be helpful if the Commission indicated at the commencement of the proceeding whether the changes that are to be considered to the price cap regime include a review of the forbearance conditions associated with the services to be capped. Further we believe Commission instructions would be helpful on the issue of what constitutes the "other forms of regulations" that paragraph 24 of the Public Notice seeks to prohibit.
Document: 675676.pdf - 40KB

2006-10-04 - City of Calgary
Decription: In accordance with the CRTC of 27 September 2006 regarding Organization and Conduct of the oral hearing, attached is the CV of M. Greg Matwichuk, witness for The City of Calgary.
Document: 675654.pdf - 31KB

2006-09-28 - Yak Communications (Canada) Inc.
Description: Please be advised Yak Communications ( Canada ) Inc. (Yak) no longer will be attending the oral hearing scheduled for October 10, 2006.
Document: 672966.pdf - 38KB

2006-09-27 - Public Interest Law Centre (PILC)
Description: This letter is to confirm with the Commission and to notify all parties and interested parties to this proceeding that in addition to representing the Consumers Association of Canada ( Manitoba Branch) and the Manitoba Society of Seniors ("CAC/MSOS"), the Public Interest Law Centre will also be representing Manitoba Keewatinook Ininew Okimowin ("MKIO") at the hearing of this proceeding.
Document: 672628.pdf - 71KB

2006-09-25 - Public Interest Law Centre (PILC)
Description: Further to our letter of September 13, 2006 this letter is to confirm that counsel for CAC/MSOS no longer intends to cross examine the witnesses from the Companies and TELUS. We do still intend to cross examine the witnesses called by MTS Allstream.
Document: 670680.pdf - 70KB

2006-09-22 - British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre (BCPIAC)
Description: In response to your letter of August 21, 2006, please be advised that we are registered intervenors in this matter. We did not receive your letter of August 21, 2006. We have checked the Interested Parties list and we are not listed.
Document: 670677.pdf - 55KB

2006-09-14 - Union des consommateurs
Description: La présente lettre vise à vous aviser que l'Union des consommateurs a l'intention de contre-interroger les témoins, ou les groupes de témoins, qui seront appelés par Bell Canada et par Telus dans le cadre de l'audience relative à l'avis public de télécom 2006-5 Examen du cadre de plafonnement des prix.
Document: 666212.doc - 79KB

2006-09-14- Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description:
As counsel to the Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization, (hereinafter "the Consumer Groups') we hereby notify the Commission that we reserve our right to cross-examine all witnesses from all other parties.
Document: 665628.doc - 125KB

2006-09-14 - Public Interest Law Centre (PILC)
Description: Further to TELUS's letter to the Commission dated September 13, 2006, this letter is to confirm that the responses to interrogatories of CAC/MSOS were sent to the Commission and all interested parties by mail on September 8, 2006. It was our belief that all interested parties did receive the responses and they have also been posted on the Commission's website.
Document: 666183.pdf - 70KB

2006-09-14 - Union des consommateurs
Description: La présente lettre vise à vous aviser que l'Union des consommateurs a l'intention d'appeler le témoin suivant dans le cadre de l'audience relative à l'avis public de télécom 2006-5 Examen du cadre de plafonnement des prix  :
Document: 655553.doc - 79KB

2006-09-13 - Public Interest Law Centre (PILC)
Description: In accordance with the Commission's letter dated August 21, 2006, this letter is to confirm that counsel for CAC/MSOS intends to cross-examine the witnesses of MTS Allstream, the Companies, and TELUS.
Document: 666155.pdf - 69KB

2006-09-13 - The City of Calgary
Description: Further to the Commission's directive dated 21 August 2006 with respect to the intention of parties to cross-examine witnesses at the hearing, The City of Calgary wishes to cross-examine the witness panels appearing on behalf of TELUS Communications Company.
Document: 665348.pdf - 43KB

2006-09-13 - Quebecor Media Inc.
Description: In accordance with the Commission's procedural letter of 21 August 2006, please be advised that Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Competitors) intend to cross-examine the following witness panels at the PN 2006-5 oral hearing.
Document: 665318.doc - 44KB

2006-09-11 - The City of Calgary
Description: We were unable to access the CRTC website for the purposes of submitting the information below, and despite repeated attempts, could not transmit this letter on September 8, 2006. Accordingly, we are trying again this morning to transmit this letter to the CRTC and Interested parties.
Document: 668426.pfd - 48KB

2006-09-08 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) as counsel to the Consumer Groups (Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization) in this proceeding is pleased to inform the Commission that it will call Dr. Trevor Roycroft as its sole witness at the oral hearing.   Dr. Roycroft will give evidence regarding telecommunications economics and will be responsible for answering questions on all the Consumer Groups' evidence and interrogatory responses.
Document: 663089.doc - 121KB

2006-09-08 - Quebecor Media Inc.
Description: In accordance with the Commission's procedural letter of 21 August 2006, please be advised that Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Competitors) intend to call the following witnesses at the PN 2006-5 oral hearing.
Document: 663091.doc - 44KB

2006-09-08 - The City of Calgary
Description: Further to the Commission' letter of 21 August 2006, please be advised that the City of Calgary intends to call only one witness in this proceeding.
Document: 665432.pdf - 188KB

2006-09-05 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for the Consumer Groups, intends to present final oral argument in the above-noted hearing.
Document: 662400.pdf - 27KB

2006-09-05 - Public Interest Law Centre (PILC)
Description: The Public Interest Law Centre, as counsel for the Consumers' Association of Canada (Manitoba Branch) and the Manitoba Society of Seniors (CAC/MSOS), intends to present final oral argument in the above-noted hearing.
Document: 662384.pdf - 69KB

2006-09-01 - Union des consommateurs
Description: La présente lettre vise à vous aviser que l’Union des consommateurs a l’intention de présenter un plaidoyer final dans le cadre de l’avis public de télécom 2006-5 Examen du cadre de plafonnement des prix.
Document: 660707.doc - 79KB

2006-09-01 - Québecor Media Inc.
Description: In accordance with the Commission’s procedural letter of 21 August 2006, please be advised that Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Competitors) intend to present oral final argument in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 660687.doc - 41KB

2006-08-22 - The City of Calgary
Description: In reference to notice issued by the CRTC dated August 21, 2006 regarding file number 8678-C12-200605553, the City of Calgary will appear to make final oral argument. Document: 657078.doc - 59KB

2006-08-22 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: Please accept this letter of intent on behalf of the Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization, (hereinafter "the Consumer Groups') to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence on 10 October 2006 in this matter.
Document: 657030.doc - 125KB

2006-08-21 - The City of Calgary
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 40 of the above noted Public Notice, this letter is to confirm that the City of Calgary intends to participate in the ral hearing commencing October 10, 2006.
Document: 657095.doc - 57KB

2006-08-21 - Union des consommateurs
Description: La présente lettre vise à vous aviser que l'Union des consommateurs a l'intention de comparaître à l'audience du 10 octobre 2006 tenue dans le cadre de l'avis public de télécom 2006-5 Examen du cadre de plafonnement des prix.
Document: 657084.doc - 79KB

2006-08-21 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: We are in receipt of the correspondence of August 11, 2006 f Bell Canada, objecting to the suggestion contained in the evidence of Dr. Roycroft filed by the Consumer Groups that an update of his original submission, filed on July 10 in the within proceeding, may be required following the receipt of interrogatory responses on September 6, 2006.
Document: 656590.doc - 125KB

2006-08-15 - Public Interest Law Centre (PILC)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 40 of the above noted Public Notice, this letter is to confirm that the Public Interest Law Centre intends to participate in the oral hearing commencing October 10, 2006.
Document: 655159.pdf - 69KB

2006-08-11 - Quebecor Media inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 40 of the above-noted public notice, please be advised that Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. intend to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence on 10 October 2006
Document: 653591.doc - 40KB

2006-08-11 - Yak Communications (Canada) Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 40 of the above-noted public notice, Yak Communications (Canada) Inc. (Yak) intends to participate in the oral hearing scheduled for October 10, 2006.
Document: 653602.pdf - 37KB

2006-08-10 - British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre (BCPIAC)
Description: We are counsel for BC Old Age Pensioners' Organization, Council for Senior Citizens' Organizations, federated anti-poverty groups of BC, End Legislated Poverty, BC Coaltion of People with Disabilities, Active Support Against Poverty, and Tenants Rights Action Coalition, collectively referred to for convenience only as "BCOAPO et al."
Document: 653615.pdf - 55KB

2006-06-01 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Group's
Description: We are in receipt of the responses of the Companies (Bell Canada and Aliant Telecom Inc.), Telus, and Sasktel to our request for procedural amendments to PN 2006-5, Review of Price Cap Framework
Document: 632031.doc - 122KB

2006-05-19 - Public Interest Law Centre (PILC)
Description: We are in receipt of Mr. Janigan's letter of May 18, 2006 requesting the Commission reconsider the process and timetable set out in Telecom Public Notice 2006-5.
Document: 628320.pdf - 70KB

2006-05-18 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Group's
Description: We are puzzled by the process outlined in Telecom Public Notice 2006-5. In particular, the Consumer Groups note that they will be required to enter such evidence that may be required to address the issues set out in the Public Notice in advance of any review of the evidence provided by the named ILEC parties to this proceeding.
Document: 629037.doc - 130KB

2006-04-20 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: Le processus d'examen du régime de réglementation des prix qu'amorcera le Conseil prochainement visera à la fois les grandes entreprises titulaires et aussi Telus (Québec) inc. et Télébec. Cet exercice sera complexe, long et onéreux en terme de ressources
Document: 623276.doc - 41KB


Section 4b) Evidence

2006-07-10 - Union des consommateurs
Description: L’Union des consommateurs dépose le présent document à titre de preuve dans le cadre de l’avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-5.
Document: 643355.zip - 3150KB

2006-07-10 - Quebecor Media (QMI) and Videotron Ltd.
Description: QMI, on behalf of itself and its subsidiary Videotron Ltd., is pleased to provide the enclosed evidence on the issues raised in PN 2006-5.
Document: 643114.zip - 31KB

2006-07-10 - City of Calgary
Description: Please find attached evidence on behalf of The City of Calgary in relation to PN 2006-5 Review of Price Cap Framework
Document: 643147.pdf - 97KB

2006-07-10 - Cogeco Cable Canada Inc., Rogers Communications Inc.and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description: The Competitors are pleased to submit Evidence pursuant to paragraph 33 of Telecom Public Notice 2006-5. This Evidence addresses the specific issues that the Commission has identified in paragraph 22 of PN 2006-5 as being the subject matter of the proceeding.
Document: 643142.pdf - 95KB

2006-07-10 - Public Interest Law Centre for CAC Manitoba and Manitoba Society of Senios Inc. (MSOS)
Description: In accordance with paragraph 33 of PN 2006-5, CAC Manitoba and MSOS are pleased to provide their position and evidence on atters set out inparagraph 22 of the Public Notice.
Document: 643132.zip - 131KB

2006-07-10 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) is counsel to the Consumer Groups (Consumers’ Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization) with respect to the above-noted proceeding. PIAC is pleased to file the evidence of Trevor Roycroft, Ph.D., on behalf of the Consumer Groups in this proceeding in accordance with paragraph 33 of the above-noted Public Notice.
Document: 643090.zip - 258KB


Section 4c) Interrogatories

2006-08-09 - Public Interest Law Centre for CAC/MSOS
Description: Enclosed please find interrogatories of CAC/MSOS addressed to MTS Allstream, Bell Aliant/SaskTel, Telus and to the Consumer.
Document: 652027.zip - 399KB

2006-08-08 - Union des consommateurs
Description: Vous trouverez, en pièces jointes à ce courriel, les demandes e renseignements de l'Union des consommateurs adressées à Bell et all. et à Telus.
Document: 652060.zip - 31KB

2006-08-08 - Stephen Johnson Chartered Accountants for City of Calgary
Description: Enclosed please find the interrogatories of the City of calgary to TELUS Communications Company.
Document: 652049.zip - 61KB

2006-08-08 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: As counsel to the Consumers’ Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization, (hereinafter the Consumer Groups) we have attached our interrogatories for the following The Companies; Telus; MTS Allstream; Rogers et al; Quebecor
Document: 652038.zip - 128KB (revised)


Section 4d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure

2006-09-18 - Union des consommateurs
Description: Bonjour, vous trouverez en pièce jointe la demande de réponses complémentaires de l'Union des consommateurs adressée à Telus.
Document: 667714.doc - 41KB

2006-09-13 - Public Interest Law Centre (PILC)
Description: In accordance with paragraph 36 of Public Notice 2006-5, CAC/MSOS is submitting both requests for further responses to their interrogatories and also requests for public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed.
Document: 666162.pdf - 122KB

2006-09-13 - Union des consommateurs
Description: Vous trouverez, en pièce jointe, la demande de réponses complémentaires de l'Union des consommateurs adressée à Bell et all.
Document: 665525.doc - 57KB

2006-09-13 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: As counsel to the Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization, (hereinafter "the Consumer Groups') we have attached Requests for Further Responses to Interrogatories and Disclosure of Information Filed in Confidence to:
Document: 665161.zip - 126KB

2006-09-13 - The City of Calgary
Description: In its evidence Telus relies on a number of external source documents in support of its evidence. Telus specifically footnotes the documents in which it has relied. Those source documents have not been provided to parties.  Calgary requested that Telus provide those source documents in its interrogatory.
Document: 665175.pdf - 120KB


Section 4e) Information to be filed pursuant to determination

No documents


Section 4f) Arguments

2006-10-27 - Public Interest Law Centre (PILC)
Description: Further to our letter of October 26, 2006 enclosing the final written argument of the Consumers’ Association of Canada (Manitoba  Branch), the Manitoba Society of Seniors and Manitoba Keewatinook  Ininew Okimowin ("CAC/MSOS/MKIO"), please find attached revised  version.
Document: 684194.zip - 196KB

2006-10-26 - Union des consommateurs
Description: L'Union des consommateurs dépose le présent document afin de soumettre ses Observations finales dans le cadre de l'avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-5.
Document: 684099.doc - 144KB

2006-10-26 - Public Interest Law Centre (PILC)
Description: Enclosed please find the final written argument of the Consumers' Association of Canada (Manitoba Branch), the Manitoba Society of Seniors and Manitoba Keewatinook Ininew Okimowin (CAC/MSOS/MKIO).
Document: 684045.zip - 227KB

2006-10-26 - The City of Calgary
Description: Please find attached our final Argument of The City of Calgary in respect of this proceeding.
Document: 684011.zip - 165KB

2006-10-26 - British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre (BCPIAC)
Description: We are counsel for BC Old Age Pensioners' Organization, Council of Senior Citizens' Organizations, federated anti-poverty groups of BC, End Legislated Poverty, BC Coalition of People with Disabilities, Active Support Against Poverty, and Tenants Rights Action Coalition, collectively referred to for convenience only as "BCOAPO".
Document: 683823.zip - 18KB

2006-10-26 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description:The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) as counsel to the Consumer Groups (Consumers’ Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization) in this proceeding is pleased to enclose the Written Argument of the Consumer Groups in the above matter.
Document: 683379.zip - 140KB

2006-10-26 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission in paragraph 42 of PN 2006-5, Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Competitors) hereby file the attached Written Argument.
Document: 683353.zip - 113KB


Section 4g) Reply arguments

2006-11-06 - The City of Calgary
Description: Please find attached our Reply Argument of The City of Calgaryin respect to this proceeding.
Document: 686958.zip - 117KB

2006-11-06 - Public Interest Law Centre (PILC) for CAC/MSOS/MKIO
Description: In accordance with paragraph 43 of Public Notice 2006-5, enclosed please find the reply argument of the Consumers' Association of Canada (Manitoba Branch), the Manitoba Society of Seniors and Manitoba Keewatinook Ininew Okimowin (CAC/MSOS/MKIO).
Document: 686948.zip - 153KB

2006-11-06 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description:  The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) as counsel to the Consumer Groups (Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization) in this proceeding is pleased to enclose the Reply Argument of the Consumer Groups in the above matter
Document:  686923.zip - 151KB

2006-11-06 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission in paragraph 43 of PN 2006-5, Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Competitors) hereby file the attached Reply.
Document: 686916.zip - 88KB


Section 4h) Comments

No documents


Section 5) Responses to Interrogatories

2006-11-07 -  Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) is in receipt of a letter dated October 31, 2006 from Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the Companies) seeking an abridged version of Shaw's response to Shaw(CRTC)13Oct06-14.
Document: 687667.zip - 19KB

2006-10-26 - Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: On 10 October 2006 , pursuant to the Commission's letter dated 29 September 2006 , Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) provided their responses to the additional interrogatories received from the Commission.   At that time, the Companies indicated that they were unable to provide copies of the maps requested in The Companies(CRTC)29Sep06-2201 PN 2006-5, but that they would do so by 26 October 2006 .   An updated copy of this interrogatory is attached.
Document: 684378.zip - 8,340KB

2006-10-11 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 6 October 2006, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the following response to interrogatories MTS Allstream (CRTC)6Oct-06-3401PN 2006-5 and MTS Allstream (CRTC)6Oct-06-3402PN 2006-5.
Document: 677717.zip - 64KB

2006-10-10 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) as counsel to the Consumer Groups (Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization) in this proceeding is pleased to enclose, Consumer Groups' Answer to CRTC Interrogatories of October 6, 2006.
Document: 677275.zip - 5,339KB

2006-10-10 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) herewith files its responses to interrogatories received from the Commission on 29 September 2006.
Document: 677241.zip - 502KB

2006-10-10 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 29 September 2006 , MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the following response to interrogatory MTS Allstream (CRTC)29Sept-06-2401PN 2006-5.
Document: 677238.zip - 55KB

2006-10-10 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) as counsel to the Consumer Groups (Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization) in this proceeding is pleased to enclose, Consumer Groups' Answer to CRTC Interrogatory of September 29, 2006.
Document: 677236.zip - 100KB

2006-10-10 - Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter dated 29 September 2006 , Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) provide their responses to the additional interrogatories received from the Commission.
Document: 677156.zip - 757KB

2006-10-06 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission 29 September 2006 letter, Cogeco Cable Inc. ( Cogeco ) is pleased to file in confidence the attached response to the Commission's interrogatory 2201.
Document: 676538.zip - 37KB

2006-10-06 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is a party to the preparation of responses to additional interrogatories received from the Commission on 29 September 2006, and submitted by Bell Canada on behalf of itself, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and SaskTel (collectively, the Companies), with the following exception.
Document: 677215.zip - 31KB

2006-10-06 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (TELUS) is filing revisions to the following interrogatory responses: TELUS(CRTC)8Aug06-1101, Attachment 1 TELUS(Consumer Groups)8Aug06-4, Attachment1
Document: 676806.zip - 200KB

2006-10-06 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated September 29, 2006 and issued pursuant to PN 2006-5, Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) is filing herewith its response to CRTC interrogatory 2201.
Document: 676596.zip - 20KB

2006-10-06 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission in its letter dated 29 September 2006, Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) is filing herewith through e-pass its response to Rogers(CRTC)29Sept06-2201 PN 2006-5.
Document: 676277.zip - 42KB

2006-10-06 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with the Commission staff letter of 4 October 2006, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is providing the information requested pertaining to interrogatory MTS Allstream(Consumer Groups)8Aug06-15 PN 2006-5 in confidence to the Commission.   An abridged version of Attachment 1 is being provided for the public record.
Document: 676213.zip - 725KB

2006-10-06 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description:  Pursuant to the process established by the Commission in its letter dated 29 September 2006, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco), Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI), Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) and Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) (collectively, the Competitors) are filing herewith through e-pass their joint response to ___(CRTC)29Sept06-2401 PN 2006-05.
Document: 676174.doc - 45KB

2006-10-06 - Quebecor Media Inc.
Description: QMI, on behalf of itself and its subsidiary Videotron Ltd., is pleased to submit the enclosed response to interrogatory QMI(CRTC)29Sept2006-2101, received from the Commission on 29 September 2006
Document: 676166.zip - 30KB

2006-10-04 - Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter dated 29 September 2006 , Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) hereby jointly submit the following supplemental responses to interrogatories:
Document: 675807.zip - 133KB

2006-10-04 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with the Commission's rulings of 27 and 29 September 2006 , MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is filing supplemental responses for the following interrogatories:
Document: 675797.zip - 81KB

2006-10-04 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5, Review of price cap framework ("PN 2006-5"), attached is the response of Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) to the Commission's request for disclosure and for further responses to interrogatories to PN 2006-5 on 29 September 2006.
Document: 675790.zip - 31KB

2006-10-04 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) herewith files further responses to the following interrogatories as directed by the Commission in its letter dated 29 September 2006 and in accordance with the procedure established by the Commission in PN 2006-5:
Document: 675514.zip (revised) - 18,553KB

2006-10-04 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5, Review of price cap framework, 2006 05 09, (PN 2006-5), attached are the responses of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (“Bell Aliant” or the “Company”) to the Commission’s request for disclosure and for further responses to interrogatories to PN 2006-5 on 2006 09 29.
Document: 675510.zip - 87KB

2006-10-03 - Bragg Communications Inc., carrying on business as Eastlink
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., carrying on business as EastLink, hereby files responses to the Commission’s interrogatories, received on September 13, 2006, relating to the above-noted proceeding. As permitted by the Commission, EastLink is filing its responses on today’s date.
Document: 675014.zip - 85KB

2006-09-20 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: This letter constitutes the written response of TELUS Communications Inc. (TELUS or the Company) to requests for further responses and requests for disclosure received by the Company from the City of Calgary , the Consumer Groups (the Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization), the Manitoba branch of the Consumers' Association of Canada and the Manitoba Society of Seniors (CAC/MSOS), l'Union des consommateurs and MTS Allstream.
Document: 670085.pdf - 60KB

2006-09-20 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: This letter constitutes the written response of TELUS Communications Inc. ("TELUS" or the "Company") to requests for further responses and requests for disclosure received by the Company from the City of Calgary, the Consumer Groups (the Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization), the Manitoba branch of the Consumers' Association of Canada and the Manitoba Society of Seniors (CAC/MSOS), l'Union des consommateurs and MTS Allstream.
Document: 669244.pdf - 75KB

2006-09-20 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (The Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out at paragraph 37 of PN 2006-5, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada, and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) are filing their responses to the requests for further responses to interrogatories received by the companies.   Responses to the requests for further responses received from CAC/MSOS, the Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization (collectively, the Consumer Groups) and MTS Allstream Inc. are provided in Attachment 1, while responses to requests for further responses received from l'Union des consommateurs are provided in Attachment 2.
Document: 668657.zip - 58KB

2006-09-20 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5, Review of price cap framework, MTS Allstream Inc. submits the following responses to requests for public disclosure of information requested in and further responses to the interrogatories identified in the Attachment.
Document: 668630.zip - 75KB

2006-09-20 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: As counsel to the Consumers' Association of Canada and theNational Anti-Poverty Organization, (hereinafter "the Consumer Groups') we have attached our Replies to Requests for Further Responses to Interrogatories and Disclosure of Information Filed in Confidence to:
Document: 668566.zip - 127KB

2006-09-12 - Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) are providing certain revisions to the French versions of some of their responses to interrogatories received from l'Union des consommateurs, filed on 6 September 2006.   The revisions are identified in the attached responses.
Document: 664564.zip - 283 KB

2006-09-12 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  TELUS Communications Company ("TELUS") herewith files its revised response to TELUS(CRTC)8Aug06-1204, which was filed on 11 September 2006.
Document: 664206.zip - 26KB

2006-09-11 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (TELUS) herewith files its responses to the following interrogatories.
Document: 665978.zip - 154KB

2006-09-08 - Public Interest Law Centre (PILC)
Description: Attached please find responses to interrogatories from TELUS Communications Company addressed to the Consumers Association ofCanada (Manitoba Branch) and the Manitoba Society of Seniors ("CAC/MSOS".
Document: 662889.pdf - 104KB

2006-09-07 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Please find enclosed a confidential hardcopy of attachment 1 of response to Rogers(CRTC)8Aug06-1203, part B). Due to the size of the file Rogers was unable to file this document through the e-pass filing system.
Document: 695458.pdf - 57KB

2006-09-07 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: As indicated in MTS Allstream's response to the above mentioned interrogatory, please find copies of the reference material as identified in footnotes 5 and 6 of MTS Allstream's response to MTS Allstream(CRTC)06May23-102 PN 2006-5.
Document: 669587.pdf - 14,321KB

2006-09-06 - QMI, on behalf of itself and its subsidiary Videotron Ltd.
Description: QMI, on behalf of itself and its subsidiary Videotron Ltd., is pleased to provide the enclosed responses to interrogatories received in the proceeding initiated by PN 2006-5.
Document: 663067.zip - 91KB

2006-09-06 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description:  Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) notes that it is a party to the submission prepared and submitted by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada and SaskTel (collectively, the Companies) on matters within the scope of this proceeding.
Document: 663054.zip - 76KB

2009-09-06 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission in PN 2006-5,  Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) is filing herewith responses to CRTC interrogatories 1202, 1203 and 1204.
Document: 663044.zip - 47KB

2006-09-06 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5, Review of price cap framework, 2006 05 09, ("PN 2006-5"), attached are the responses of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership ("Bell Aliant" or the "Company") to interrogatories received from parties to PN 2006-5 on 2006 08 08.
Document: 662966.zip - 140KB

2006-09-06 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission in PN 2006-5, Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) is filing herewith through e-pass responses to certain of the interrogatories it received from the CRTC, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the Companies), and the Consumers Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization (collectively, the Consumer Groups) on August 8, 2006.
Document: 663033.zip - 61KB

2006-09-06 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 35 of the above-noted public notice, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits interrogatory responses to the following parties:
Document: 662995.zip - 1,815KB

2006-09-06 - Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (Sasktel) (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in paragraph 35 of PN 2006-5, Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) provide responses to interrogatories received from the Commission and interested parties.
Document:  662149.zip - 2,543KB

2006-09-06 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) as counsel to the Consumer Groups (Consumers’ Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization) in this proceeding is pleased to enclose, in accordance with paragraph 35 of the above-noted Public Notice, the Consumer Groups’ Answers to Interrogatories.
Document: 662470.zip (revised) - 17,114KB - 662470_1.zip - 2,155KB

2006-09-06 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company ("TELUS") herewith files its responses to interrogatories received from the Commission and other parties on 8 August 2006.
Document: 662538.zip - 466KB

2006-09-06 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission in PN 2006-5, Cogeco Cable Inc.(Cogeco), Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI), Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) and Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) (collectively, the Competitors) are filing herewith through e-pass responses to the interrogatories received from the CRTC, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the Companies), and the Consumers Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization (collectively, the Consumer Groups) on August 8, 2006.
Document: 662976.zip - 211KB

2006-09-06 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission in PN 2006-5, please find attached the responses of Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) to the Commission's Interrogatories 1202, 1203 and 1204.
Document: 662477.zip - 41KB

2006-07-10 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS herewith files its comments and responses to interrogatories in accordance with the procedure established by the Commission in PN 2006-5
Document: 643251.zip - 77KB

2006-07-10 - Bell Aliant, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: In accordance with the procedures outlined at paragraphs 32 and 33 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5 (PN 2006-5), Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada, and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) are filing their evidence and responses to the Commission interrogatories received 24 May 2006
Document: 643221.zip - 2182KB

2006-07-10 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  Pursuant to the procedures set out in paragraph 32 of PN 2006-5, MTS Allstream submits responses to the following interrogatories.
Document: 643045.zip - 228KB (revised)

2006-07-10 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) notes that it is a party to the submission prepared and submitted by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada and SaskTel (collectively, the Companies) on matters within the scope of this proceeding
Document: 643021.zip - 46KB

2006-07-10 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in paragraph 32 of PN 2006-5, attached are the responses of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant or the Partnership) to the following interrogatories.
Document: 643002.zip - 90KB


Section 6 - Exhibits and responses to undertakings (Documents received at the oral hearing)

2006-11-10 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) is filing herewith through e-pass responses to undertakings that it provided to the CRTC at the public hearing on October 13, 2006.
Document: 688744.zip - 1,936KB

2006-11-06 - Telus Communications Company (TCC)
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is herewith filing its response to CRTC Undertaking #12. TELUS will refer to this response as TELUS Undertaking #5.
Document: 687690.zip - 18KB

2006-10-31 - Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of a letter from Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) dated 30 October 2006 wherein Shaw provides its responses to various undertakings, including its response to Shaw( CRTC )13Oct06-14 Telecom PN CRTC 2006-5.
Document: 685445.doc - 110KB

2006-10-30 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: In the course of the Competitor's testimony at the Oral Hearing phase of the Price Cap proceeding, the Commission and TELUS sought the company's undertaking to provide information respecting the following:
Document: 684269.zip - 196KB

2006-10-26 - Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out by the Commission in the above noted proceeding, Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) are filing their responses to CRTC Undertaking No. 13 regarding price cap parameters in The Companies Exhibit # 17.
Document: 683719.zip - 68KB

2006-10-26 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) hereby submits its responses to the following undertakings.
Document: 683627.zip - 72KB

2006-10-26 - Québecor Média Inc.
Description: QMI, on behalf of itself and its subsidiary Videotron Ltd., is pleased to provide the enclosed responses to undertakings in the proceeding initiated by PN 2006-5.
Document: 683549.zip - 281KB

2006-10-26 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company ("TELUS") herewith files its response to Undertaking #11 from the Commission. TELUS will refer to this response as TELUS Undertaking #4.
Document: 683512.zip - 35KB

2006-10-26 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable inc. (Cogeco) is providing the following responses to undertakings made during the Oral Hearing.
Document: 683262.zip - 582KB

2006-10-25 - Bell Canada and Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out by the Commission in the above-noted proceeding, Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) are filing the following responses to undertakings:
Document: 682995.zip - 147KB

2006-10-24 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: On 23 October 2006 , Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel or the Company) filed its responses to undertakings as requested by the Commission in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 682289.zip - 34KB

2006-10-23 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: In accordance with the Commission's letter of 27 September 2006 (Revised), Organization and conduct of the oral hearing, pursuant to Public Notice CRTC 2006-5, Review of price cap framework , Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is filing its responses to undertakings as requested by the Commission.
Document: 681911.zip - 56KB

2006-10-20 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) is counsel to the Consumer Groups (Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization) with respect to the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 681794.zip - 116KB

2006-10-13 - Bell Canada
Description: Exhibit #1
Document: 681665.pdf - 45KB

2006-10-13 - Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Exhibit #13
Document: 688258.pdf - 82KB

2006-10-12 - Telus Communications Company
Description: Exhibit #12
Document: 688257.pdf - 53KB

2006-10-12 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Exhibits #3
Document: 688254.pdf - 70KB

2006-10-12 - Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Exhibits #1 to #3
Document: 681671.zip - 728KB

2006-10-12 - BC Public Interest Advocacy Center (BCOAPO et al)
Description: Exhibits #1 and #2
Document: 681667.zip - 205KB

2006-10-12 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: Exhibits #2
Document: 688253.pdf - 98KB

2006-10-11 - Bell Canada
Description: Exhibits #1
Document: 688252.pdf - 65KB

2006-10-10 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Exhibits #1 to #17
Document: 682856.zip - 15,351KB

2006-10-10 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Exhibits #1 to #4
Document: 681675.zip - 2,179KB

2006-10-10- Bell Canada, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Exhibits #1 to #14
Document: 683847.zip - 3,982KB


Section 7 - Transcripts


Section 8a) Costs

2007-02-06 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the "Consumer Groups") is writing to amend the costs claim of the Consumer Groups, filed December 21, 2006 , in the above matter.
Document: 720027.pdf - 1,907KB

2007-01-31 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description:  Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada, and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of an application for costs from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of the Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Association (the Consumer Groups).
Document: 717081.doc - 72KB

2007-01-26 - Telus Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company ("TELUS") is in receipt of an Application for Costs from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumer Groups dated December 21, 2006.
Document: 715216.pdf - 23KB

2006-12-29 - Bragg Communications Inc., carrying on business as EastLink
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., carrying on business as EastLink (“EastLink”), is in receipt of the application for costs of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), on behalf of the Consumer Groups, in relation to the above-noted proceeding (by letter dated December 21, 2006).
Document: 706684.pdf - 90KB

2006-12-22 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description:  The Companies are in receipt of an Application for Costs from the British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre, on behalf of BCOAPO et al , dated 7 December 2006 and received by the Companies on 14 December 2006.   The Companies do not object to the claimant's entitlement to costs.
Document: 704872.doc - 73KB

2006-12-21 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: This is an application for costs and taxation thereof, made on behalf of the Consumers Group in respect of their participation in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 707037.pdf - 2,021KB (revised)

2006-12-21 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of Applications for Costs from l'Union des consommateurs, the Public Interest Law Centre on behalf of the Consumers Association of Canada (Manitoba Branch), the Manitoba Society of Seniors, and the Manitoba Keewatinook Ininew Okimowin (CAC/MSOS/MKIO) and from BC Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the British Columbia Old Age Pensioners' Organization et al. 
Document: 704595.pdf - 22KB

2006-12-20 - Eastlink
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., carrying on business as Eastlink, is in receipt of the application for costs of l'Union des consommateurs in relation to the above-noted proceeding (by letter dated December 7, 2006, and received December 10, 2006).
Document: 704576.pdf - 90KB

2006-12-20 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of an Application for Costs from the Public Interest Law Centre (PILC) on behalf of the Consumers Association of Canada (Manitoba Branch), the Manitoba Society of Seniors, and the Manitoba Keewatinook Ininew Okimowin, dated 12 December 2006.
Document: 708388.doc - 70KB

2006-12-20 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies
Description:  Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of an Application for Costs from l'Union des consommateurs, dated 7 December 2006 and received by the Companies on 10 December 2006 .
Document: 703942.doc - 70KB

2006-12-20 - EastLink
Description:  Bragg Communications carrying on business as EastLink is in receipt of the application for costs of the Public Interest Law Centre in relation to the above-noted proceeding (by letter dated December 12, 2006).
Document: 703928.pdf - 86KB

2006-12-12 - Public Interest Law Centre (PILC) on behalf of CAC/MSOS/MKIO
Description: On behalf of the Consumers Association of Canada (Manitoba Branch), the Manitoba Society of Seniors, and Manitoba Keewatinook Ininew Okimowin (CAC/MSOS/MKIO), we are writing to apply for an award of costs with respect to the above noted proceeding.
Document: 702194.pdf - 529KB (revised)

2006-12-07 - BC Public Interest Advocacy Centre for BCOAPO et al
Description: The BC Public Interest Advocacy Centre applies on behalf of British Columbia Old Age Pensioners' Organization et al for costs in these proceedings and have enclosed our costs application with this letter.
Document: 702053.zip - 75KB

2006-12-07 - Union des consommateurs
Description: Conformément à l'article 44 des Règles de procédure du CRTC et à l'avis public 2006-5, l'Union des consommateurs demande l'adjudication de ses frais pour sa participation à l'avis public de télécom 2006-6.
Document: 700157.pdf - 532KB


Section 8b) Others

2019-05-31 - Telebec, Limited Partnership
Description: Tariff Pages - ISSUED PAGES - Decision 2007-27 - I-X
Document: 3655619.doc - 193 Ko

2019-05-31 - Bell MTS
Description: Tariff Pages - ISSUED PAGES - Decision 2007-27 - I-X
Document: 33655380.pdf - 193KB

2019-05-31 - Bell Aliant
Description: Tariff Pages - ISSUED PAGES - Decision 2007-27 - I-X
Document: 3655415.zip - 209KB

2019-05-31 - Bell Canada
Description: Tariff Pages - ISSUED PAGES - Decision 2007-27 - I-X
Document: 3655457.zip - 164KB

 

2019-05-28 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description : Pursuant to paragraphs 164 and 244(iii) of Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, and paragraph 241 of Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2015-326, TELUS Communications Inc. (“TELUS” or the “Company”) attaches the affected tariff pages reflecting the rate decreases for 2019 due to the application of the I-X constraint, effective June 1, 2019:
Document : 3653311.pdf - 587KB

2019-05-27 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description : Le 30 avril 2007, la Décision de télécom CRTC 2007-27 intitulée Cadre de plafonnement des prix applicable aux grandes entreprises de services locaux titulaires (« Décision 2007-27 ») fut émise concernant l’application des tarifs aux Services aux concurrents.
Document : 3653247.pdf - 587KB

2018-05-31 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description : Pursuant to paragraphs 164 and 244(iii) of Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, and paragraph 241 of Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2015-326, TELUS Communications Inc. (“TELUS” or the “Company”) attaches the affected tariff pages reflecting the rate decreases for 2018 due to the application of the I-X constraint, effective June 1, 2018:
Document : 3148038.pdf - 1,031KB

2018-05-31 - Telebec
Description: Les tarifs et les frais suivants sont payables avant l'établissement et/ou la fourniture d'un fichier répertoire.
Document: 3147208.doc - 464KB

2018-05-31 - Bell MTS
Description: Tariff Pages - ISSUED PAGES - Decision 2007-27 - I-X
Document: 3147195.zip - 67KB

2018-05-31 - Bell Aliant
Description: Tariff Pages - ISSUED PAGES - Decision 2007-27 - I-X
Document: 3147188.zip - 210KB

2018-05-31 - Bell Canada
Description: Tariff Pages - ISSUED PAGES - Decision 2007-27 - I-X
Document: 3147161.zip - 187KB

2018-05-22 - SaskTel
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, attached are revisions to Saskatchewan Telecommunications’ (SaskTel) Competitor Access Tariff (CRTC 21414) as set out in the table below:
Document: 3134310.zip - 865KB

2017-06-14 - Bell Aliant
Description: ISSUED PAGES - Decision 2007-27 - Bell Aliant
Document: 2912126.doc - 48KB

2016-05-31 - TELUS
Description: Le 30 avril 2007, la Décision de télécom CRTC 2007-27 intitulée Cadre de plafonnement des prix applicable aux grandes entreprises de services locaux titulaires (« Décision 2007-27 ») fut émise concernant l’application des tarifs aux Services aux concurrents.
Document: 2618856.pdf - 214KB

2016-05-31 - TELUS
Description: Pursuant to paragraphs 164 and 244(iii) of Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, and paragraph 241 of Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2015-326, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) attaches the affected tariff pages reflecting the rate decreases for 2016 due to the application of the I-X constraint, effective June 1, 2016:
Document: 2618855.zip - 2114KB

2016-05-30 - Bell Aliant
Description : ISSUED PAGES - Decision 2007-27 - Bell Aliant
Document : 2618846.zip - 233KB

2016-05-30 - Télébec
Description: ISSUED PAGES - Decision 2007-27 - I-X -Telebec
Document: 2618834.doc - 83KB

2016-05-30 - Bell Canada
Description: Issued Pages - Decision 2007-27 - Bell Canada
Document: 2618823.zip - 737KB

2016-05-24 - MTS Allstream
Description: MTS Inc. is issuing its revised tariff pages, along with the previously-approved tariff pages, to reflect the application of the I-X pricing constraint on the rates for the former category 1 competitor services.  The effective date of the revised tariff pages is 1 June 2016.
Document: 2618077.zip - 737KB

2016-05-16 - SaskTel
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, attached are revisions to SaskTel’s Competitor Access Tariff (CRTC 21414) as set out in the table below: 
Document: 2610773.zip - 592KB

2014-06-02 - Société TELUS Communications
Description: Le 30 mai 2014, TELUS a soumis la lettre no. 30 visant à publier les pages de tarifs illustrant l’application de la restriction I – X aux tarifs des Services aux concurrents de la catégorie I entrant en vigueur le 1er juin 2014.
Document: 2142682.pdf - 213KB

2014-05-29 - The Companies
Description: ISSUED PAGES - D2007-27 - Price Caps 2014 - I-X - GT-SFT-AST
Document: 2140733.doc - 2669KB

2014-05-29 - Telebec, Societe en Commandite
Description: ISSUED PAGES - Price Caps - D2007-27 - I-X - Telebec
Document: 2140728.doc - 514KB

2014-05-29 - Bell Canada
Description: ISSUED PAGES - D2007-27 - Price Caps 2014 - I-X - NST
Document: 2140669.doc - 102KB

2014-05-29 - Bell Aliant
Description: ISSUED PAGES - Price Caps - D2007-27 - I-X - Atlantic
Document: 2140643.zip - 250KB

2013-05-31 - Société TELUS Communications
Description: Le 30 avril 2007, la Décision de télécom CRTC 2007-27 intitulée Cadre de plafonnement des prix applicable aux grandes entreprises de services locaux titulaires (« Décision 2007-27 ») fut émise concernant l’application des tarifs aux Services aux concurrents.
Document: 1918397.pdf - 227KB

2013-05-30 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, attached are revisions to SaskTel's Competitor Access Tariffs (CRTC 21414)
Document: 1917565.zip - 174KB

2013-05-29 - Bell Canada
Description: Issued Pages
Document: - 197513.doc - 103KB

2013-05-29 - Bell Aliant
Description: Issued Pages
Document: - 1917475.doc - 2684KB

2013-05-29 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: Issued Pages
Document: - 1916320.doc - 257KB

2013-05-28 - Télébec, Société en commandite
Description: Issued Pages
Document: 1916198.doc - 514KB

2013-05-24 - MTS Allstream
Description: MTS Inc. (hereinafter MTS Allstream) is filing its revised tariff pages, along with the previously-approved tariff pages, to reflect the application of the I-X pricing constraint on the rates for the former category 1 competitor services.  The effective date of the revised tariff pages is 1 June 2013.
Document: 1915733.zip - 624KB

2012-06-01 - Télébec, Société en commandite
Description: Pages tarifaires approuvées
Document: 1723926.doc - 495KB

2012-06-01 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Pursuant to paragraphs 164 and 244(iii) of Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) attaches the affected tariff pages reflecting the rate decreases for 2011 due to the application of the I-X constraint, effective 2012 06 01 (with I=3.251%, X=3.2% and I-X = 0.051%).
Document: 1723912.zip - 389KB

2012-05-31 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, attached are revisions to SaskTel's Competitor Access Tariff (CRTC 21414) as set out in the table below: 
Document: 1723865.pdf - 172KB

2012-05-31 - Société TELUS Communications
Description: Le 30 avril 2007, la Décision de télécom CRTC 2007-27 intitulée Cadre de plafonnement des prix applicable aux grandes entreprises de services locaux titulaires (« Décision 2007-27 ») fut émise concernant l’application des tarifs aux Services aux concurrents.
Document: 1723814.pdf - 210KB

2012-05-23 - MTS Allstream
Document: MTS Inc. (hereinafter MTS Allstream) is filing revised tariff pages, along with its previously-approved tariff pages, to reflect the application of the I-X pricing constraint on the rates for the former category 1 competitor services for effective 1 June 2012.
Document: 1724711.zip - 553KB

2012-04-23 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: REVISED - ISSUED PAGES - D2007-27 - Price Caps 2012 - I-X - GT-SFT-AST.
Document: 1708823.doc - 137KB

2012-04-16 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: ISSUED PAGES - D2007-27 - Price Caps 2012 - I-X - AA
Document: 1705637.zip - 233KB

2012-04-16 - Bell Canada
Description: ISSUED PAGES - D2007-27 - Price Caps 2012 - I-X - NST
Document: 1705630.doc - 83KB

2012-04-16 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: ISSUED PAGES - D2007-27 - Price Caps 2012 - I-X - GT-SFT-AST
Document: 1705603.doc - 2513KB

2011-07-25 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, attached is a revision to SaskTel's Competitor Access Tariff.
Document: 1594642.zip - 23KB

2011-06-01 - Télébec, Société en commandite
Description: General Tariff (GT) for Telebec, Societe en commandite - ISSUED Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27.
Document: 1574785.doc - 662KB

2011-06-01 - Bell Canada
Description: National Services Tariff (NST) - ISSUED Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27.
Dcoument: 1574776.doc - 137KB

2011-06-01 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Access Services Tariff (AST) for Bell Aliant and Bell Canada - ISSUED Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27.
Document: 1574735.zip - 225KB

2011-06-01 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: General Tariff (GT) for Bell Aliant and Bell Canada - ISSUED Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27.
Document: 1574722.zip - 116KB

2011-06-01 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Aliant General Tariff (AAGT) - ISSUED Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27 for the following Aliant Atlantic General tariffs: CRTC 10001 (Maritime Tel), 11001 (Island Tel), 12001 (NBTel), 13001 (NewTel), and 21491 (Aliant Telecom Inc.).
Document: 1574704.zip - 298KB

2011-05-31 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Pursuant to paragraphs 164 and 244(iii) of Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) attaches the affected tariff pages reflecting the rate decreases for 2011 due to the application of the I-X constraint, effective 2011 06 01 (with I=3.009%, X=3.2% and I-X = 0.191%).
Document: 1574682.pdf - 412KB

2011-05-31 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, attached are revisions to SaskTel's Competitor Access Tariff (CRTC 21414).
Document: 1574648.zip - 179KB

2011-05-26 - Société TELUS Communications
Description: Le 30 avril 2007, la Décision de télécom CRTC 2007-27 intitulée Cadre de plafonnement des prix applicable aux grandes entreprises de services locaux titulaires (« Décision 2007-27 ») fut émise concernant l’application des tarifs aux Services aux concurrents.
Document: 1574587.pdf - 213KB

2011-02-10 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: ISSUED PAGES from Bell Aliant and Bell Canada as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27.
Document: 1507917.doc - 256KB

2010-07-06 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, attached is a revision to SaskTel's Competitor Access Tariff (CRTC 21414).
Document: 1415111.zip - 28KB

2010-06-01 - Bell Canada
Description: National Services Tariff (NST) - ISSUED Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27.
Document: 1400731.zip - 25KB

2010-06-01 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Aliant General Tariff (AAGT) - ISSUED Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27 for the following Aliant Atlantic General tariffs: CRTC 10001 (Maritime Tel), 11001 (Island Tel), 12001 (NBTel), 13001 (NewTel), and 21491 (Aliant Telecom Inc.).
Document: 1400723.zip - 280KB

2010-06-01 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Access Services Tariff (AST) - ISSUED Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27.
Document: 1400712.zip - 259KB

2010-06-01 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Special Facilities Tariff (SFT) - ISSUED Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27.
Document: 1400682.zip - 111KB

2010-06-01 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: General Tariff (GT) - ISSUED Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27.
Document: 1400674.zip - 105KB

2010-05-31 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, attached are revisions to SaskTel's General Tariff - Competitive Services (CRTC 21412) and SaskTel’s Competitor Access Tariff (CRTC 21414).
Document: 1400663.zip - 188KB

2010-05-28 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Pursuant to paragraphs 164 and 244(iii) of Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) attaches the affected tariff pages reflecting the rate decreases for 2010 due to the application of the I-X constraint, effective 2010 06 01 (with I=-1.9331%, X=3.2% and I-X = -5.1331%).
Document: 1400626.zip - 349KB

2010-05-21 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Please find attached MTS Allstream’s revised tariff pages, along with the existing tariff pages, that reflect the application of the I-X constraint on rates for the former category 1 competitor services, effective 1 June 2010.
Document: 1397734.zip - 491KB

2010-05-20 - Société TELUS Communications
Description: Le 30 avril 2007, la Décision de télécom CRTC 2007-27 intitulée Cadre de plafonnement des prix applicable aux grandes entreprises de services locaux titulaires (« Décision 2007-27 ») fut émise concernant l’application des tarifs aux Services aux concurrents.
Document: 1397674.zip - 177KB

2009-06-03 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: REVISED - Access Services Tariff (AST) - ISSUED Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27
Document: 1214044.doc - 254KB

2009-06-01 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description:  Issued Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27
Document: 1206776.doc - 2130KB

2009-05-29 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description:  Special Facilities Tariff (SFT) - Issued Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27
Document: 1206539.doc - 688KB

2009-05-29 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: General Tariff (GT) - Issued Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27
Document: 1206513.doc - 752KB

2009-05-29 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Access Services Tariff - Issued Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27
Document: 1206402.doc - 1863KB

2009-05-29 - Société TELUS Communications
Description: Le 30 avril 2007, la Décision 2007-27 fut émise concernant l'application des tarifs aux Services aux concurrents.
Document: 1187078.pdf - 307KB

2009-05-28 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Pursuant to paragraphs 164 and 244 (iii) of Decision 2007-27, TELUS attached the affected tariff pages reflecting the rate increases for 2009 due to the application of the I-X constraint, effective 2009 06 01.
Document: 1185838.zip - 161KB

2009-05-28 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description:  Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, attached are revisions to SaskTel's General Tariff - Competitive Services (CRTC 21412) and SaskTel's Competitor Access Tariff (CRTC 21414) as set out in the table below
Document: 1157552.zip - 152KB

2009-05-26 - Bell Canada
Description: National Services Tariff (NST) - ISSUED Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27.
Document: 1149550.doc - 98KB

2009-05-26 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Aliant Atlantic Provinces-ISSUED Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27
Document: 1149548.doc - 384KB

2008-07-22 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS publie une page de tarif révisée afin d'apporter des corretions mineures à son Tarif des services d'accès.
Document: 937853.pdf - 85KB

2008-07-09 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  On May 30, 2008, TELUS Communications issued, pursuant to paragraphs 164 and 244(iii) of Decision 2007-27, revised tariff pages reflecting the rate reductions due to the application of the I-X constraint, effective 2008 06 01.
Document: 927066.pdf - 73KB

2008-06-15 - Bell Canada and Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description:  Approved pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27 (Price Caps)
Document: 917237.zip - 116KB

2008-05-30 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  Pursuant to paragraphs 164 and 244(iii) of Decision 2007-27, TELUS attaches the affected tariff pages reflecting the rate reductions due to the application of the I-X constraint
Document: 925178.pdf - 2124KB

2008-05-30 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Approved tariff pages
Document: 911938.doc - 890KB

2008-05-30 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
Description: Approved tariff pages as per Telecom Decision 2007-27.
Document: 911823.zip - 426KB

2008-05-29 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, attached are revisions to SaskTel's General Tariff - Competitive Services (CRTC 21412) and SaskTel's Competitor Access Tariff (CRTC 21414) as set out in the table below:
Document: 911741.zip - 144KB

2008-05-22 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  Please update the corresponding pages of our MTS Allstram General Tariff with the attached revised tariff pages.
Document: 925177.pdf - 147KB

2008-02-14 - Société TELUS Communications
Description:  Page de tarif révisées suite à la décision 2007-27
Document: 866169.pdf - 267KB

2007-11-14 - Télébec, Société en commandite
Description:  Pages de tafif approuvées suite à la décision 2007-27
Document: 849918.pdf - 105KB

2007-10-02 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description:  Pages de tarif approuvées suite à la décision 2007-27
Document: 826379.pdf - 125KB

2007-09-14 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS is reissuing its tariff pages that were submitted on 01 June 2007 in Update No. 2007-6 due to an error in the calculation of revised rates for category 1 competitor services for 1 June 2007 to reflect inflation minus productivity.
Document: 812852.pdf - 809KB

2007-09-14 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  MTS is reissuing its tariff pages that were submitted on 01 June 2007 in Update No. 2007-6 due to an error in the calculation of revised rates for category 1 competitor services for 1 June 2007 to reflect inflation minus productivity.
Document: 812853.pdf - 255KB

2007-09-14 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  MTS is reissuing its tariff pages that were submitted on 01 June 2007 in Update No. 2007-6 due to an error in the calculation of revised rates for category 1 competitor services for 1 June 2007
Document: 812855.pdf - 108KB

2007-08-20 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description:  Pages de tarif approuvées suite à la décision 2007-27
Document: 826377.pdf - 692KB

2007-08-10 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description:  Approved Tariff Pages pursuant to Decision 2007-27
Document: 800842.pdf - 78KB

2007-07-05 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description:  This tariff pages was inadvertently missed from the original package that was sent June 4, 2007.
Document: 791340.pdf - 48KB

2007-06-28 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  Approved Tariff Pages issued pursuant to Telecom Decision 2007-27
Document: 786154.pdf - 110KB

2007-06-26 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  Revised Tariff Pages issued pursuant to Telecom Decision 2007-27.
Document: 790136.pdf - 920KB

2007-06-25 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  Please update the corresponding pages of your MTS Allstram Special Assemblies Tariff with the attached revised tariff page.
Document: 791341.pdf - 152KB

2007-06-20 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description:  Approved Tariff Pages issued pursuant to Telecom Decision 2007-27.
Document: 786153.pdf - 879KB

2007-06-14 - Bell Canada and Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (the Companies)
Description: Tariff pages re: Telecom Decision 2007-27
Document: 775668.zip - 580KB (revised)

2007-06-14 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description:  In Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27, paragraph 244, the Commission directed each ILEC to issue tariff pages by 1 June of each year reflecting the application of the I-X constraint on rates for Category I Competitor Services effective 1 June of each year
Document: 775688.zip - 594KB

2007-05-31 - Société TELUS Communications
Description:  Tarif applicables aux Services aux concurrents - Décision de télécom 2007-27
Document: 777390.pdf - 1061KB

2007-05-31 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  Pursuant to paragraphs 164 and 244 (iii) of Decision 2007-27, TELUS attached the affected tariff pages reflecting the rate reductions due to the application of the I-X constraint, effecitve 2007 06 01
Document:  777387.pdf - 2234KB

Date modified: