ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter - 8678-C12-200605553
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
File Number: 8678-C12-200605553
Ottawa, 8 August 2006
By Electronic mail
Ms. Teresa Griffin-Muir
Re: Review of price cap framework, Telecom Public Notice 2006-5
Dear Ms. Griffin-Muir:
Pursuant to the procedures set out in Review of price cap framework, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-5, 9 May 2006, attached are interrogatories associated with this proceeding.
Responses to these interrogatories are to be filed with the Commission, and served on all the interested parties to this proceeding, by 6 September 2006.
(Original signed by)
cc: Bob Noakes, CRTC, 819-997-4429 bob.noakes @CRTC.gc.ca
Services, Baskets and Pricing Constraints
1201 At paragraph iv) of its submission, MTS Allstream stated that, ''.the price cap regime for retail services for the next price cap period should be designed in a manner that promotes competition, protects consumers, facilitates increased reliance on market forces and reduces regulatory burden.''
1202 A) In response to interrogatory MTS Allstream(CRTC)06May23-203, the company states the following:
1301 In Forbearance from the regulation of retail local exchange services , Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15, 6 April 2006, paragraph 488, the Commission indicated that it was ''.prepared to consider applications from an ILEC requesting the removal of the local winback rule in a relevant market when the applicant ILEC can demonstrate that it has lost 20 percent of its market share in that relevant market.''.
Date Modified: 2006-08-08
- Date modified: