MTS Allstream Inc. : 8661-M59-201115403

Demande de reclassification des services Ethernet et de redressement auxiliaire - 2011-11-25

Interventions

Répliques

2012-12-14 - Ordonnance de télécom CRTC 2012-684 Réclamation de frais
Demande d'attribution de frais concernant la participation du Centre pour la défense de l'intérêt public à l'instance concernant par la demande de MTS Allstream Inc. visant la reclassification des services Ethernet de gros
Numéros de dossiers : 8661-M59-201115403 et 4754-398

2012-06-18 - AT&T Global Services Canada Co.
Description: Set out below please find the response of AT&T Global Services Canada Co. to the Request for Information from the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission dated May 8, 2012 regarding Ethernet Services and related matters.
Document: 1730443.pdf - 73KO

2012-06-11 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: Thank you for your letter of 8 June 2012 regarding the above-noted applications.
Document: 1727400.pdf - 507KO

2012-06-08 - Lettre procédurale du Conseil
Dossier # : 8661-M59-201115403 - 8661-P8-201116807 - 8661-C12-201204057 - 8663-B54-201200501
Description : Lettre adressée au Centre pour la défense de l’intérêt public - Objet : Réclamations de frais présentées par le PIAC pour sa participation à diverses instances du Conseil (demande en vertu de la partie I présentée par MTS relative au reclassement des services Ethernet (dossier 8661-M59-201115403); demande en vertu de la partie I présentée par le PIAC relative à certaines pratiques de facturation (dossier 8661-P8-201116807); avis de consultation de télécom 2012-206; demande en vertu de la partie I présentée par Bell relative à la révision des exigences de négociation des ententes (dossier 8663-B54-201200501) N/Réf. : 4754-398, 4754-399, 4754-402 et 4754-403

2012-05-28 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) wishes to inform the Commission that, in its response to the interrogatories posed by Commission staff in a letter dated 8 May 2012, an inappropriate version of the SaskTel response to SASKTEL(CRTC)8MAY12-201 ETHERNET SERVICES was included.  SaskTel wishes to withdraw that document and file the correct SaskTel response, which is attached to this filing.
Document: 1722588.zip - 64KO

2012-05-25 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Pursuant to the Commission letters dates May 8th and 17th, Vaxination Informatique presents its short additional comments on the above 2 files.
Document: 1722769.pdf - 572KO

2012-05-25 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited Partnership and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out by the Commission in its letters dated 8 May 2012 and 17 May 2012, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited Partnership and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are attaching their responses to the Commission's requests for information.
Document: 1722744.zip - 276KO

2012-05-25 - O.N.Tel Inc. carrying on business as Ontera
Description: O.N.Tel Inc. carrying on business as Ontera (“Ontera”) is in receipt of interrogatory number 101 from the Commission dated 8 May 2012 related to prior Part 1 applications filed by Bell Canada on 23 June 2011 and MTS Allstream Inc. filed on 11 November 2011.
Document: 1722731.zip - 307KO

2012-05-25 - Northwestel
Description: On May 8, 2012, the CRTC issued an interrogatory to Northwestel on the above noted matter. Attached is the Company’s response.
Document: 1722717.zip - 47KO

2012-05-25 - MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc. (collectively MTS Allstream) are hereby providing responses to the requests for information received in a Commission staff letter dated 8 May 2012 with regards to Ethernet Services and related matters.
Document: 1722666.zip - 279KO

2012-05-25 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff 17 May 2012 letter, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby submits the attached responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC.
Document: 1722545.zip - 112KO

2012-05-25 - Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB)
Description: I am writing on behalf of the 109,000 small- and medium-sized business owners who are members of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB), to support MTS Allstream’s application for reclassification of wholesale Ethernet services and ancillary relief, as well as the extension of the phase out period to 2014.
Document: 1722209.pdf - 72KO

2012-05-25 - British Columbia Broadband Association
Description: The BC Broadband Association is in receipt of a letter from the Commission dated 8 May 2012 regarding request for information on applications regarding Ethernet Services and related matters.
Document: 1722133.pdf - 455KO

2012-05-25 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: In accordance with the Commission’s letter of 17 May 2012, please find attached herein the answers of Rogers Communications Partnership (Rogers) to the Commission’s requests for information (RFIs) in the above-noted matter.
Document: 1721513.zip - 76KO

2012-05-25 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) hereby provides its response to the interrogatories posed by Commission staff in a letter dated 8 May 2012.
Document: 1721494.zip - 79KO

2012-05-25 - Verizon Canada Ltd.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letters in the above-captioned proceeding, dated May 8, 2012 and May 17, 2012, please find attached the response of Verizon Canada Ltd. to the following request for information from the Commission: Verizon Canada(CRTC)8May12-101.
Document: 1721457.zip - 109KO

2012-05-25 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of a Commission staff request for information dated 8 May 2012. Pursuant to the revised process set out in the Commission staff letter dated 17 May 2012, Primus is hereby filing its response.
Document: 1721442.zip - 217KO

2012-05-25 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Distributel Communications Limited (“Distributel”) is in receipt of the Commission request for Information letter dated May 8, 2012 with respect to the above proceedings and hereby submits the response of Distributel to (CRTC) 08May12-202.
Document: 1721432.zip - 30KO

2012-05-25 - Shaw Telecom G.P.
Description: Shaw Telecom G.P. (Shaw) is in receipt of an interrogatory from the Commission dated 8 May 2012 related to wholesale and retail Ethernet Services in relation to a Part 1 application filed by Bell Canada on 23 June 2011 and a Part 1application filed by MTS Allstream Inc. filed on 11 November 2011.
Document: 1721403.zip - 139KO

2012-05-25 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of two different letters from the CRTC, both dated 8 May 2012, wherein the Commission asks for responses to certain requests for information as set out in three interrogatory questions related to the above noted Commission files. In accordance with the amended date for filing responses as per the staff process letter dated May 17, 2012, TELUS files its attached responses to the interrogatories for this proceeding.
Document: 1721383.zip - 205KO

2012-05-25 - Navigata Communications 2009
Description: In the following, Navigata Communications 2009 (Navigata) provides its response to your 8 May 2012 request for information. Specifically, we are providing revenues derived from Navigata’s Ethernet services; to the extent the information is available.
Document: 1721369.pdf - 264KO

2012-05-25 - Québecor Média inc. au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron s.e.n.c.
Description: Conformément aux directives du Conseil énoncées dans sa lettre datée du 17 mai 2012, Québecor Média inc. (Québecor Média), au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron s.e.n.c. (Vidéotron), soumet par la présente ses réponses à des demandes de renseignements.
Document: 1721352.zip - 142KO

2012-05-25 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: In accordance with the Commission’s letters dated 8 May 2012 and 17 May 2012, Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is hereby filing its response to the information request posed to CNOC by the Commission.
Document: 1721346.zip - 21KO

2012-05-23 - Radianz Americas Inc.
Description: Responses to requests for information.
Document: 1722053.pdf - 46KO

2012-05-17 - Lettre procédurale du Conseil
Dossier # : 8663-B54-201109893 - 8661-M59-201115403
Description : Lettre adressée à la Liste de Distribution - Objet : Demandes relatives aux services Ethernet et aux questions connexes – Demande de prolongation et modification des procédures

2012-05-16 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt of a letter dated May 16, 2012, filed by Cogeco Cable Inc. (“Cogeco”) in relation interrogatories issued by Commission staff on May 8, 2012 for the above-noted applications. TELUS was a recipient of the interrogatories posed.
Document: 1718569.pdf - 76KO

2012-05-16 - Shaw Telecom G.P.
Description: Shaw Telecom G.P. (Shaw) is in receipt of a letter dated 16 May 2012 from Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) requesting an extension to the deadline for filing interrogatory responses and a modification to procedure in the above reference matter.
Document: 1718560.pdf - 53KO

2012-05-16 - Cogeco Cable inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable inc. (Cogeco) is in receipt of an interrogatory, dated 8 May 2012, from the Commission in the above-noted proceeding. Pursuant to the CRTC directive, the response to this interrogatory must be filed by 18 May 2012.
Document: 1718552.pdf - 81KO

2012-05-11 - MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc. (collectively, MTS Allstream) is in receipt of two Commission letters issued 8 May 2012 regarding Ethernet Services and related matters.  MTS Allstream thanks the Commission for its attention to this very important file.  MTS Allstream believes these two proceedings are of critical importance to the future of a competitive and innovative digital economy in Canada.
Document: 1716896.pdf - 129KO

2012-05-08 - Lettre procédurale du Conseil
Dossier # : 8663-B54-201109893 - 8661-M59-201115403
Description : Lettre adressée à la Liste de Distribution - Objet : Demande concernant les services Ethernet et questions connexes – Demandes de renseignements

2012-05-08 - Lettre procédurale du Conseil
Dossier # : 8663-B54-201109893 - 8661-M59-201115403
Description : Lettre adressée à la Liste de Distribution - Objet : Demande concernant les services Ethernet et questions connexes – Demandes de renseignements

2012-03-22 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) is in receipt of two letters in relation to its costs claim of 5 March 2012. The first, dated 15 March 2012 from TELUS Communications Company, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the “companies”) objects to PIAC's claim on several bases and also requests, should costs nonetheless be ordered, that MTS Allstream Inc., which brought the original application, be the sole or majority costs respondent.
Document: 1690864.pdf - 30KO

2012-03-20 - MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc. (collectively, MTS Allstream) are in receipt of the application for costs filed by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) dated 5 March 2012, regarding MTS Allstream’s Part 1 Application for the reclassification of wholesale Ethernet services and ancillary relief, as well as the letter filed 15 March, 2012 by TELUS Communications Company (TELUS), Bell Aliant Regional Communications Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, Bell) and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), collectively the “companies”, objecting to the PIAC cost application.
Document: 1688883.doc -132KO

2012-03-15 - TELUS Communications Company, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (the “companies”)
Description: TELUS Communications Company, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the “companies”) are in receipt of an application for costs filed by PIAC in relation to the above-noted proceeding. Pursuant to Rule 67 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure (the “Rules”), the companies file this Answer to PIAC’s application for costs.
Document: 1686893.pdf - 103KO

2012-03-05 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for Consumer Groups hereby submits its costs claim in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1681870.pdf - 155KO

2012-01-25 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of a letter from MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc. (collectively, MTS Allstream) dated 24 January 2012 where MTS Allstream requests the Companies to provide it with an unabridged version of their 16 January 2012 comments (the Comments) by end of day 25 January 2012.
Document: 1664874.doc - 85KO

2011-11-25 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby filing an application requesting the reclassification of wholesale Ethernet services and certain ancillary relief, pursuant to Part I of the CRTC Rules of Practice and Procedure.
Document: 1643658.zip - 304KO

Date de modification :

2012-12-14