(1) Bell Media et CIDG; et (2) Bell Media et TELUS : 8622-B80-201205716
Demande d'arbitrage de l'offre finale par Bell Média, conformément au BI 2009-38 par rapport à un différend relatif aux renouvellements des ententes d'affiliation entre : (1) Bell Média et CIDG; et (2) Bell Média et TELUS - 2012-05-09
2012-06-28 - Lettre du Conseil
Dossier # : 8622-B80-201205716
Description: Lettre adressée à Bell Média et Canadian Independent Distributors Group -
Objet : Demande d’arbitrage de l’offre finale présentée par Bell Media inc. en ce qui concerne le différend lié au renouvellement des contrats d’affiliation conclus entre Bell Media inc. et le CIDG – Confidentialité des documents
2012-06-11 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à Bell Media, Canadian Independent Distributors Group et Telus - Objet : Demande d'arbitrage de l'offre finale par Bell Média, conformément au BI 2009-38 par rapport à un différend relatif aux renouvellements des ententes d'affiliation entre : (1) Bell Média et CIDG; et (2) Bell Média et TELUS (dossier 8622-B80-201205716)
2012-06-04 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à
Bell Media, Canadian Independent Distributors Group et Telus - Objet : Demande d'arbitrage de l'offre finale par Bell Média, conformément au BI 2009-38 par rapport à un différend relatif aux renouvellements des ententes d'affiliation entre : (1) Bell Média et CIDG; et (2) Bell Média et TELUS (dossier 8622-B80-201205716)
2012-05-30 - Canadian Independent Communications Group (CIDG)
Description: The Canadian Independent Communications Group (CIDG”) has received a copy of a letter to the Commission, dated May 30, 2012 from Bell Media Inc. (“Bell”) requesting that all parties be granted the right to file a written reply in the final offer arbitration process between the parties in the subject dispute.
Document: 1724385.docx - 242KO
2012-05-30 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:
TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt of correspondence dated May 30, 2012 from Bell Media Inc. (“Bell”) requesting that all parties be granted the right to file a written reply in the final offer arbitration process between the parties in the above-referenced dispute. TELUS notes that the process letter relating to this arbitration process received from the Commission on May 24, 2012 did not mention a formal written reply phase although such a right of reply is envisioned in Broadcasting and Telecom Information Bulletin 2009-38, Practices and procedures for staff-assisted mediation, final offer arbitration and expedited hearings. Accordingly, clarity on the issue of the right to file a written reply would be most welcome.
Document: 1723598.pdf - 43KO
2012-05-24 - Lettre procédurale du Conseil
Description:
Lettre adressée à Bell Media,
Canadian Independent Distributors Group et TELUS -
Objet : Demande d'arbitrage de l’offre finale en vertu des articles 12 à 15 du Règlement sur la distribution de radiodiffusion en ce qui concerne le différend opposant le Canadian Independent Distributors Group et Bell Média Inc.
2012-05-14 - Canadian Independent Distributors Group (CIDG)
Description:
CIDG has reviewed the application by Bell Media Inc. (Bell) for final offer arbitration
dated May 9, 2012 and hereby provides its comments in reply to this application.
Document: 1717467.zip - 408KO
2012-05-09 - Bell Media Inc.
Description: This is an application by Bell Media Inc. (Bell Media) pursuant to Sections 12 to 15 of the Broadcasting Distribution Regulations (BDU Regulations) requesting Commission-supervised final offer arbitration as outlined in Broadcasting and Telecom Information Bulletin CRTC 2009‑38 (BTIB 2009-38), as amended by Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2011‑601 (BRP 2011-601), with respect to a dispute with the Canadian Independent Distributors Group (CIDG) concerning the execution of affiliation agreements for 29 of Bell Media's programming services (Bell Media Services).
Document: 1716422.doc - 83KO
- Date de modification :