2008-10-20 - #: 8665-C12-200814021 - Avis public 2008-14 - Appel aux observations sur d'éventuelles modifications de certaines Règles sur les télécommunications non sollicitées
Déposer en utilisant les services en ligne
Calendrier - Avis Public 2008-14
|
Activités |
Dates limites |
| Avis d'intention de participer |
2008-10-30 |
| Observations | 2008-12-04 |
| Répliques aux observations | 2008-12-19 |
Section 1 - Documents du Conseil
a) Avis public, Décisions, etc.
b) Liste des parties intéressées
c) Correspondance aux parties
Section 4 - Documents des parties
a) Correspondance au Conseil
b) Observations
c) Répliques aux observations
Section 8 - Documents divers
a) Frais
b) Autres
Section 1a) Avis public, Decision, etc.
2009-07-03 - Ordonnance de télécom CRTC 2009-397-1 Corrections apportées à l'Ordonnance de télécom CRTC 2009-397, 30 juin 2009.
Numéro de dossier : 8665-C12-200814021 et 4754-339
2009-06-30 - Ordonnance de télécom CRTC 2009-398 Demande d'adjudication de frais concernant la participation du Centre pour la défense de l'intérêt public (PIAC), au nom de l'Association des consommateurs du Canada et de l'Organisation nationale antipauvreté, à l'instance amorcée par l'avis public de télécom 200814
Numéro de dossier : 8665-C12-200814021 et 4754-333
2009-06-30 - Ordonnance de télécom CRTC 2009-397 Demande d'adjudication de frais concernant la participation de la Coalition of Canadian Consumers à l'instance amorcée par l'avis public de télécom 200814
Numéro de dossier : 8665-C12-200814021 et 4754-339
2009-04-20 - Politique réglementaire de télécom CRTC 2009-200 Modifications de certaines Règles sur les télécommunications non sollicitées
Numéro de dossier : 8665-C12-200814021
2008-11-25 - Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-14-1 Correction apportée au paragraphe 18 de l'avis Appel aux observations sur d'éventuelles modifications de certaines Règles sur les télécommunications non sollicitées, Avis public de télécom CRTC 2008-14, 20 octobre 2008
Référence : 8665-C12-200814021
Section 1c) Correspondance aux parties
2008-11-13 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à Bell Canada et Rogers Communications Inc. - Objet: Portée de l'avis public de télécom CRTC 2008-14
Section 4a) Correspondance au Conseil
2008-11-03 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Consumer Groups are in receipt of a motion from Rogers, dated today, to enlarge the above proceeding to include consideration of coverage of SMS, MMS and other types of text and multimedia messages delivered via telephone number to a subscriber and the application of the National DNCL and telemarketing rules.
Document: 972893.pfd - 29KO
2008-11-03 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: On October 20th, 2008, the Commission issued PN 2008-14 to initiate a proceeding to examine potential modifications to the Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules (UTR). The three rules identified by the Commission for review relate to the National Do Not Call List (DNCL) exemption for political candidates, the effective DNCL registration period for consumers' telecommunications numbers and the calling hour restrictions applicable to Automatic Dialing-Announcing Device (ADAD) telecommunications.
Document: 972883.pdf - 46KO
2008-10-24 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: On 20 October 2008 the Commission issued PN 2008-14 to initiate a proceeding to examine potential modifications to the Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules (UTR). The three rules identified by the Commission for review relate to the National Do Not Call List (DNCL) exemption for political candidates, the effective DNCL registration period for consumers' telecommunications numbers and the calling hour restrictions applicable to Automatic Dialing-Announcing Device (ADAD) telecommunications.
Document: 969142.doc - 68KO
Section 4b) Observations
Observations par ordre alphabétique
2008-12-04 - Independent Financial Brokers of Canada (IFB)
Description: Independent Financial Brokers of Canada (IFB) is pleased to provide comment on Telecom Public Notice 2008-14 issued on October 20, 2008.
Document: 987046.doc - 141KO
2008-12-04 - Coalition of Communication Consumers
Description: Please find enclosed the comments from my client, the Coalition Communications Consumers, regarding the above-noted Public Notice.
Document: 986811.pdf - 334KO
2008-12-04 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In PN 2008-14,the Commission invited comments from interested parties on three issues relating to the implementation of the National Do Not Call List and the Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules.
Document: 986771.pdf - 24KO
2008-12-04 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus is in receipt of Telecom Public Notice 2008-14, 20 October 2008. Pursuantto the procedures established by the Commission, Primus hereby submits its comments.
Document: 986763.pdf - 54KO
2008-12-04 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the Consumer Groups) is pleased to enclose the comments of the Consumer Groups in the above matter.
Document: 986758.zip - 50KO
2008-12-04 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, MTS Allstream Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, société en commandite and TELUS Communications Company (the Companies)
Description: In accordance with the process set out in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-14, dated 20 October 2008, Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, MTS Allstream, SaskTel, Télébec, société en commandite and TELUS Communications Company (collectively, the Companies) are pleased to provide these comments on the issues raised in PN 2008-14
Document: 986732.zip - 22KO
2008-12-03 - Canadian Marketing Association (CMA)
Description: The Canadian Marketing Association ( CMA ) is pleased to respond to the Commission's request for comments about three provisions within the Unsolicited Telecommunications rules and the Automatic Dialing & Announcing Device Rules. CMA is specifically interested in commenting on two of the issues
Document: 986802.doc - 95KO
2008-12-03 - Temple Scott Associates for MBNA Canada Bank
Description: We appreciate the opportunity to put forth our views on the potential modifications to the Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules, as outlined in PN 2008-14.
Document: 985904.pdf - 23KO
2008-12-03 - Advocis, the Financial Advisors Association of Canada
Description: Advocis is a national, voluntary association of financial advisors and planners, representing the interests and views of life and health insurance licensees, mutual fund sales persons and securities registrants.
Document: 985794.pdf - 45KO
2008-12-02 - Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM)
Description: Please find attached FCM's submission regarding the issue noted above.
Document: 985700e.pdf - 76KO - 985703f.pdf - 77KO
2008-12-02 - Canadian Bankers Association (CBA)
Description: The Canadian Bankers Association appreciates the opportunity to make our views known on potential modifications to some Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules, as outlined in Public Notice 2008-14.
Document: 985724.pdf - 105KO
2008-11-27 - 97% of the People of Canada
Description: We are an organization comprises of more than 32 million Canadians. Our mandate is to give voice to the opinions of telephone subscribers and their families-the victims of illegal telemarketing.
Document: 982545.pdf - 49KB
2008-11-27 - Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association Inc. (CLHIA)
Description: The Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association is pleased to provide comment on Telecom Public Notice 2008-14.
Document: 985665.pdf - 38KO
2008-11-21 - Union of British Columbia Municipalities
Description: In response to your notice of consultation, issued on October 20, 2008, inviting comments on potential modifications to the National Do Not Call List (DNCL), the Union of British Columbia Municipalities (UBCM) wishes to formally respond to section 2 (1) which asks, "Should telemarketing telecommunications made by or on behalf of candidates in a federal, provincial, or municipal election that are not candidates of a registered political party be excluded from the application of the DNCL rules?
Document: 981115.doc - 70KO
2008-11-19 - Ventriloquist Voice Solutions Intl Inc.
Description: I have received both the CRTC bulletin issued on October 20 (PN 2008-14) and a submission by Bell Aliant regarding eliminating the requirement to have the Mailing address included in ADAD messages.
Document: 981119.doc - 73KO
Section 4c) Répliques aux observations
2008-12-19 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counseil for Consumers' Assocition of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the Consumer Groups) is pleased to enclose the Reply Comments of the Consumer Groups in the above matter.
Document: 999805. zip - 64KO
2008-12-19 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, MTS Allstream Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, Société en commandite and TELUS Communications Company (the Companies)
Description: In accordance with the process set out in PN 2008-14, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, MTS Allstream Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, Société en commandite and TELUS Communications Company (collectively, the Companies) are pleased to provide these reply comments on the issues raised in PN 2008-14
Document: 999896.zip - 25KB (révisé)
2008-12-19 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus is in receipt of comments. Pursuant to paragraph 20 of PN 2008-14, 20 October 2008, Primus hereby submits its reply comments.
Document: 995671.pdf - 51KO
2008-12-18 - Coalition of Communication Consumers
Description: Please find enclosed the Reply Comments from my client, the Coalition of Communication Consumers, regarding the above-noted Public Notice.
Document: 994897.pdf - 478KO
2008-12-08 - Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO)
Description: I write to you in reply to the submission identified itself as being from "Ninety-Seven Percent of the People of Canada" and to follow up from my letter of September 11, 2008.
Document: 993411.pdf - 102KO
2008-11-27 - 97% of the People of Canada
Description: We regret that so fat the CRTC has depended solely upon the opinions of telemarketing industry lobbyists, rather than actively seeking the advise of professional engineers who are skilled in the efficients design of database systems.
Document: 985675.zip - 184KO
Section 8a) Frais
2009-02-10 - Jennifer M. Long for Coalition of Communication Consumers
Description: Please find enclosed the Reply of the Coalitionof Communication Consumers to the Companies' Reply of 9 February 2009 in relation to the Coalition's cost claim in the above-noted proceedings.
Document: 1025827.pdf - 234KO
2009-02-09 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies) are in receipt of applications for costs from the Coalition of Communication Consumers dated 28 January 2009 regarding to PN 2008-14 and 2 February 2009 regarding PN 2008-16.
Document: 1021569.doc - 100KO
2009-02-06 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of a claim for costs filing on January 28, 2009, by Jennifer M. Long, Counsel for the Coalition, in relation to its participation in the proceeding initiated by PN 2008-14.
Document: 1020571.pdf - 23KO
2009-02-02 - Canadian Marketing Association (CMA)
Description: The Canadian Marketing Association is in receipt of applications for costs in the above-noted proceeding from PIAC for Consumer Groups dated January 19, 2009 and from Jennifer M. Long for Coalition of Communications Consumers dated January 28, 2009.
Description: 1018729.pdf - 89KO
2009-01-28 - Jennifer M. Long for Coalition of Communication Consumers
Description: Please find enclosed the required forms for a Costs Application on behalf of my client, Coalition of Communication Consumers, made pursuant to s.44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure.
Document: 1015584.pdf - 185KB
2009-01-28 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of an application for costs in the above-noted proceeding from PIAC on behalf of the Consumer Groups dated 19 January 2009.
Document: 1015331.doc - 95KO
2009-01-28 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company is in receipt of an application for costs from PIAC dated January 19, 2009 in relation to its participation in the proceeding initiated by PN 2008-14.
Document: 1015326.pdf - 24KO
2009-01-19 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: This application for costs and taxation thereof, made on behalf of the Consumer Groups in respect of their participation in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1009281.pdf - 167KO
Section 8b) Autres
Aucun documents
Mise à jour : 2009-07-03
- Date de modification :