2008-06-09 - #: 8665-C12-200807828 - Avis public 2008-7 - Examen des mesures de réglementation afférentes à la communication de renseignements aux clients par divers moyens de communication, à la lumière de la décision de télécom 2008-34

Déposer en utilisant les services en ligne


Calendrier - Avis Public 2008-7
 

Activités

 Dates limites

Avis d'intention de participer

2008-06-30

Dépôt du sondage de YPG 2008-08-28
Répliques sur le matériel déposé 2008-09-16 (révisée)
Observations 2008-07-21 (révisée)
Répliques aux observations 2008-07-31 (révisée)

Liste des documents connexes

Section 1 - Documents du Conseil
a) Avis public, Décisions, etc.
b) Liste des parties intéressées
c) Correspondance aux parties

Section 4 - Documents des Parties
a) Correspondance au Conseil
b) Observations
c) Répliques aux observations

Section 8 - Documents divers
a) Frais
b) Autres


Section 1a) Avis public, Decision, etc.

2009-03-24 - Politique réglementaire de télécom CRTC 2009-156 Révision des mesures de réglementation afférentes à la communication de renseignements aux clients
Numéro de dossier : 8665-C12-200807828

2008-12-22 - Ordonnance de frais de télécom CRTC 2008-26 Réclamation de frais concernant la participation du Centre pour la défense de l'intérêt public, au nom de l'Association des consommateurs du Canada et de l'Organisation nationale anti‑pauvreté, à l'instance amorcée par l'avis public de télécom 2008‑7
Référence : 8665-C12-200807828 et 4754-328

2008-10-27 - Ordonnance de frais de télécom CRTC 2008-18 Réclamation de frais concernant la participation de ARCH Disability Law Centre à l'instance amorcée par l'avis public de télécom 2008‑7
Référence : 8665-C12-200807828 et 4754-325

2008-10-27 - Ordonnance de frais de télécom CRTC 2008-17 Réclamation de frais concernant la participation de l'Union des consommateurs à l'instance amorcée par l'avis public de télécom 2008-7
Référence : 8665-C12-200807828 et 4754-326


Section 1c) Correspondance aux parties

2008-09-04 - Lettre du Conseil
Description:  Lettre adressée aux Parties intéressées à l'AP 2008-7 - Re: Examen des mesures de réglementation afférentes à la communication de renseignements aux clients par divers moyens de communication, à la lumière de la décision de télécom 2008-34, Avis public de télécom CRTC 2008-7 - Sondage présenté par le Groupe pages jaunes - changement de procédure

2008-08-22 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée aux Parties intéressées à l'AP 2008-7 - Re: Examen des mesures de réglementation afférentes à la communication de renseignements aux clients par divers moyens de communication, à la lumière de la décision de télécom 2008-34, Avis public de télécom CRTC 2008-7 - Sondage présenté par le Groupe pages jaunes

2008-07-07 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée aux Parties intéressées à l'AP 2008-7 - Objet: Examen des mesures de réglementation afférentes à la communication de renseignements aux clients par divers moyens de communication, à la lumière de la décision de télécom 2008-34, Avis public de télécom CRTC 2008-7 - Demande de prolongation

 


Section 4a) Correspondance au Conseil

2008-07-04 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: SaskTel has received correspondence from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, dated 3 July 2008, on behalf of the Consumer Association of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the Consumer Groups) regarding their registration as interested parties in the above Subject proceeding and requesting a revision to the schedule of the proceeding set out in Public Notice 2008-7
Document: 923641.pdf - 31KO

2008-07-03 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description:  The Consumer Groups further request a two week extension of time for filing comments on  the above-noted Public Notice, to 21 July 2008.
Document: 923640.pdf - 36KO


Section 4b) Observations

2008-07-21 - Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC)
Description:  On behalf of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC), we appreciate the Commission offering us the opportunity to respond to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-7 and would like to offer the following comments with respect to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-7
Document: 931000.doc - 70KO

2008-07-21 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description:  The Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization by their counsel the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) (The Consumer Group) are pleased to provide the Commission with comments on the issues raised by Review of the regulatory requirements to provide information to customers using various means of communication in light of Telecom Decision 2008-34, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-7, 9 June 2008
Document:  929259.doc - 200KO

2008-07-21 - ARCH Disability Law Centre
Description:  ARC H Disability Law Centre is pleased to submit the enclosed Comments in accordance with the procedures established at paragraph 10 of the above-noted Public Notice, as amended by Commission letter dated July 7, 2008
Document: 929250.zip - 76KO

2008-07-21 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedures as set out by the Commission at paragraph 10 of PN 2008-7 and by Commission staff letter dated July 7, 2008, TELUS files its Comments in erlation to this proceeding.
Document: 929247.zip - 109KO

2008-07-21 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description:  In accordance with the process set out in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-7, dated 9 June 2008, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, Société en commandite (Télébec) (collectively, the Companies) are pleased to provide these comments on the issues raised in PN 2008-7
Document: 929238.zip - 83KO

2008-07-21 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: These are the comments of MTS Allstream to Public Notice 2008-7.
Document:  929226.pdf - 83KO

2008-07-02 - Ministry of Service Alberta's Consumer Services Branch
Description:  Thank you for the opportunity to comments on the CRTC deliberations with respect to existing regulation that requires telecom service providers to provide written information to customers about their use of services.
Document: 924502.pdf - 250KO


Section 4c) Répliques aux observations

2008-09-16 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description:  The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the Consumer Groups) is pleased to enclose their Comments on the YPG survey, in accordance with the Commission's letters of 22 August 2008 and 4 September 2008, in the above matter.
Document:  952615.zip - 47KO

2008-07-31 - Blakes, Cassels & Graydon for Yellow Pages Group Co. (YPG)
Description:  In accordance with the process set out in PN 2008-7, dated 9 June 2008, as amended by the Commission's letter dated July 7, 2008, Yellow Pages Group Co. (YPG) is pleased to provide this reply on the issues raised in PN 2008-7
Document: 935575.zip - 1600KO

2008-07-31 - Union des consommateurs
Description: La présente fait état des observations en répliques faites par l'Union des consommateurs.
Document: 933817.pdf - 98KO

2008-07-31 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  These are the reply comments of MTS Allstream Inc. to Public Notice 2008-7, 9 June 2008.
Document:  933503.pdf - 63KO

2008-07-31 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  Pursuant to the Commission's procedures as set out in paragraph 11 of PN 2008-7, as amended by the Commission staff letter dated July 7, 2008, TELUS files these Reply Comments.
Document:  933501.pdf - 73KO

2008-07-31 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description:  Pursuant to the procedures set out at paragraph 11 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-7, as amended by Commission staff letter dated 7 July 2008, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are pleased to provide these reply comments on the issues raised in PN 2008-7
Document:  933496.zip - 68KO

2008-07-31 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description:  The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the Consumer Groups) is pleased to enclose the Reply Comments on the Consumer Groups in the above matter.
Document: 933493.zip - 85KO


Section 8a) Frais

2008-10-09 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description:  The Companies are in receipt of an application for costs by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of the Consumer Groups, dated 3 October 2008.   The Companies do not object to PIAC's eligibility for costs or the amounts claimed.
Document:  963642.doc - 93KO

2008-10-03 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description:  This is an application for costs and taxation thereof, made on behalf of the Consumer Groups in respect to their application in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 960945.pdf - 324KO

2008-09 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: The Companies are in receipt of applications for costs in the above-noted proceeding from l'Union des Consommateurs, dated 3 September 2008 and ARCH, Disability Law Centre, dated 29 August 2008.  The Companies do not object to the applicants' eligibility for costs or the amounts claimed.  The Companies submit that any costs awarded should be allocated among the costs respondents in proportion to each respondent's level of participation and interest in the outcome of the proceeding
Document: 949678.doc - 87KO

2008-09-08 - TELUS Communiations Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of an application for costs filed by the ARCH Disability Law Centre (ARCH) dated August 29, 2008. TELUS does not object to ARCH's entitlement to costs nor the quantum requested. TELUS requests that all telecommunications service providers that participated in the proceeding should be included as costs respondents. Accordingly, the apportionment of any costs award should be based on each participating telecommunications service provider's relative share of telecommunications operating revenues.
Document: 949618.pdf - 19KO

2008-09-08 - TELUS Communiations Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of an application for costs filed by the Union des consommateurs (L'Union) dated September 3, 2008. TELUS does not object to L'Union's entitlement to costs nor the quantum requested. TELUS requests that all telecommunications service providers that participated in the proceeding should be included as costs respondents. Accordingly, the apportionment of any costs award should be based on each participating telecommunications service provider's relative share of telecommunications operating revenues.
Document: 949621.pdf - 19KO

2008-09-03 - Union des consommateurs
Description: Conformément à l’article 44 des Règles de procédure du CRTC en matière de télécommunications et à l’Avis public CRTC 2002-5, l’Union des consommateurs demande l’adjudication de ses frais pour sa participation à l’Avis public 2008-7 Examen des mesures de réglementation afférentes à la communication de renseignements aux clients par divers moyens de communication, à la lumière de la décision de télécom 2008-34.
Document: 946846.zip - 1,487KO

2008-08-29 - ARCH Disability Law Centre
Description: ARCH Disability Law Centre, in accordance with Rule 44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, applies for costs with respect to our participation in the above-noted proceeding.   ARCH submits that its participation meets all of the requirements set out in Rule 44.
Document: 945315.zip - 67KO


Section 8b) Autres

Aucun documents


Mise à jour : 2009-03-24

Date de modification :