2008-06-09 - #: 8665-C12-200807828 - Public Notice 2008-7 - Review of the regulatory requirements to provide information to customers using various means of communication in light of Telecom Decision 2008-34
File using the On-line Services
|
Activities |
Deadline Dates |
| Notice of intention to participate | 2008-06-30 |
| Survey to be filed by YPG | 2008-08-28 |
| Reply comments to material filed by YPG | 2008-09-16 (revised) |
| Comments | 2008-07-21 (revised) |
| Reply comments | 2008-07-31 (revised) |
Section 1 - Commission Documents
a) Public Notices, Decisions, etc.
b) List of Interested Parties
c) Correspondence to Parties
Section 4 - Documents from parties
a) Correspondence to the Commission
b) Comments
c) Reply comments
Section 8 - Miscellaneous Documents
a) Costs
b) Others
Section 1a) Public Notices, Decisions, etc.
2009-03-24 - Telecom regulatory policy CRTC 2009-156 Revised regulatory requirements to provide information to customers
File number: 8665-C12-200807828
2008-12-22 - Telecom Cost Order CRTC 2008-26 Determination of costs award with respect to the participation of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, on behalf of the Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization, in the Telecom Public Notice 2008-7 proceeding
Reference: 8665-C12-200807828 and 4754-328
2008-10-27 - Telecom Cost Order CRTC 2008-18 Determination of costs award with respect to the participation of ARCH Disability Law Centre in the Telecom Public Notice 2008‑7 proceeding
Reference: 8665-C12-200807828 and 4754-325
2008-10-27 - Telecom Cost Order CRTC 2008-17 Determination of costs award with respect to the participation of l'Union des consommateurs in the Telecom Public Notice 2008-7 proceeding
Reference: 8665-C12-00807828 and 4754-326
Section 1c) Correspondence to Parties
2008-09-04 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Interested Parties to Telecom Public Notice 2008-7 - Re: Review of the regulatory requirements to provide information to customers using various means of communications in light of Telecom Decision 2008-34, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-7 – Survey filed by the Yellow Pages Group – Change in procedure
2008-08-22 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Interested Parties to PN 2008-7 - Re: Review of the regulatory requirements to provide information to customers using various means of communications in light of Telecom Decision 2008-34, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-7 - Survey filed by the Yellow Pages Group
2008-07-07 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Interested Parties to PN 2008-7 - Re: Review of the regulatory requirements to provide information to customers using various means of communications in light of Telecom Decision 2008-34, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-7 - Request for extension
Section 4a) Correspondence to the Commission
2008-07-04 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: SaskTel has received correspondence from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, dated 3 July 2008, on behalf of the Consumer Association of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the Consumer Groups) regarding their registration as interested parties in the above Subject proceeding and requesting a revision to the schedule of the proceeding set out in Public Notice 2008-7
Document: 923641.pdf - 31KB
2008-07-03 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Consumer Groups further request a two week extension of time for filing comments on the above-noted Public Notice, to 21 July 2008.
Document: 923640.pdf - 36KB
Section 4b) Comments
2008-07-21 - Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC)
Description: On behalf of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC), we appreciate the Commission offering us the opportunity to respond to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-7 and would like to offer the following comments with respect to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-7
Document: 931000.doc - 70KB
2008-07-21 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization by their counsel the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) (The Consumer Group) are pleased to provide the Commission with comments on the issues raised by Review of the regulatory requirements to provide information to customers using various means of communication in light of Telecom Decision 2008-34, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-7, 9 June 2008
Document: 929259.doc - 200KB
2008-07-21 - ARCH Disability Law Centre
Description: ARC H Disability Law Centre is pleased to submit the enclosed Comments in accordance with the procedures established at paragraph 10 of the above-noted Public Notice, as amended by Commission letter dated July 7, 2008
Document: 929250.zip - 76KB
2008-07-21 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedures as set out by the Commission at paragraph 10 of PN 2008-7 and by Commission staff letter dated July 7, 2008, TELUS files its Comments in erlation to this proceeding.
Document: 929247.zip - 109KB
2008-07-21 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: In accordance with the process set out in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-7, dated 9 June 2008, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, Société en commandite (Télébec) (collectively, the Companies) are pleased to provide these comments on the issues raised in PN 2008-7
Document: 929238.zip - 83KB
2008-07-21 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: These are the comments of MTS Allstream to Public Notice 2008-7.
Document: 929226.pdf - 83KB
2008-07-02 - Ministry of Service Alberta's Consumer Services Branch
Description: Thank you for the opportunity to comments on the CRTC deliberations with respect to existing regulation that requires telecom service providers to provide written information to customers about their use of services.
Document: 924502.pdf - 250KB
Section 4c) Reply comments
2008-09-16 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the Consumer Groups) is pleased to enclose their Comments on the YPG survey, in accordance with the Commission's letters of 22 August 2008 and 4 September 2008, in the above matter.
Document: 952615.zip - 47KB
2008-07-31 - Blakes, Cassels & Graydon for Yellow Pages Group Co. (YPG)
Description: In accordance with the process set out in PN 2008-7, dated 9 June 2008, as amended by the Commission's letter dated July 7, 2008, Yellow Pages Group Co. (YPG) is pleased to provide this reply on the issues raised in PN 2008-7
Document: 935575.zip - 1600KB
2008-07-31 - Union des consommateurs
Description: La présente fait état des observations en répliques faites par l'Union des consommateurs.
Document: 933817.pdf - 98KB
2008-07-31 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: These are the reply comments of MTS Allstream Inc. to Public Notice 2008-7, 9 June 2008.
Document: 933503.pdf - 63KB
2008-07-31 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's procedures as set out in paragraph 11 of PN 2008-7, as amended by the Commission staff letter dated July 7, 2008, TELUS files these Reply Comments.
Document: 933501.pdf - 73KB
2008-07-31 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out at paragraph 11 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-7, as amended by Commission staff letter dated 7 July 2008, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are pleased to provide these reply comments on the issues raised in PN 2008-7
Document: 933496.zip - 68KB
2008-07-31 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the Consumer Groups) is pleased to enclose the Reply Comments on the Consumer Groups in the above matter.
Document: 933493.zip - 85KB
Section 8a) Costs
2008-10-09 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: The Companies are in receipt of an application for costs by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of the Consumer Groups, dated 3 October 2008. The Companies do not object to PIAC's eligibility for costs or the amounts claimed.
Document: 963642.doc - 93KB
2008-10-03 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: This is an application for costs and taxation thereof, made on behalf of the Consumer Groups in respect to their application in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 960945.pdf - 324KB
2008-09-09 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: The Companies are in receipt of applications for costs in the above-noted proceeding from l'Union des Consommateurs, dated 3 September 2008 and ARCH, Disability Law Centre, dated 29 August 2008. The Companies do not object to the applicants' eligibility for costs or the amounts claimed. The Companies submit that any costs awarded should be allocated among the costs respondents in proportion to each respondent's level of participation and interest in the outcome of the proceeding
Document: 949678.doc - 87KB
2008-09-08 - TELUS Communiations Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of an application for costs filed by the ARCH Disability Law Centre (ARCH) dated August 29, 2008. TELUS does not object to ARCH's entitlement to costs nor the quantum requested. TELUS requests that all telecommunications service providers that participated in the proceeding should be included as costs respondents. Accordingly, the apportionment of any costs award should be based on each participating telecommunications service provider's relative share of telecommunications operating revenues.
Document: 949618.pdf - 19KB
2008-09-08 - TELUS Communiations Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of an application for costs filed by the Union des consommateurs (L'Union) dated September 3, 2008. TELUS does not object to L'Union's entitlement to costs nor the quantum requested. TELUS requests that all telecommunications service providers that participated in the proceeding should be included as costs respondents. Accordingly, the apportionment of any costs award should be based on each participating telecommunications service provider's relative share of telecommunications operating revenues.
Document: 949621.pdf - 19KB
2008-09-03 - Union des consommateurs
Description: Conformément à l’article 44 des Règles de procédure du CRTC en matière de télécommunications et à l’Avis public CRTC 2002-5, l’Union des consommateurs demande l’adjudication de ses frais pour sa participation à l’Avis public 2008-7 Examen des mesures de réglementation afférentes à la communication de renseignements aux clients par divers moyens de communication, à la lumière de la décision de télécom 2008-34.
Document: 946846.zip - 1,487KB
2008-08-29 - ARCH Disability Law Centre
Description: ARCH Disability Law Centre, in accordance with Rule 44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, applies for costs with respect to our participation in the above-noted proceeding. ARCH submits that its participation meets all of the requirements set out in Rule 44.
Document: 945315.zip - 67KB
Section 8b) Others
No documents
- Date modified: