8663-C12-200402892 - Public Notice 2004-2 - Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol

• Public Notice - Schedule
• List of Related Documents

Public Notice 2004-2 Schedule

List of Related Documents

Section 1 - Commission Documents
a) Public Notices, Decisions, etc.
b) List of Interested Parties
c) Correspondence to Parties
d) Interrogatories

Section 4 - Documents from Parties
a) Correspondence to the Commission
b) Comments
c) Interrogatories
d) n/a
e) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure
f) Replies to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure
g) Reply comments

Section 5 - Responses to interrogatories

Section 8 - Miscellaneous Documents
a) Costs
b) Others

Section 1a) Public Notices, Decisions, etc.

2010-06-17 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-387 Viability of proposals for the provision of E9 1 1 service for nomadic and fixed/non native VoIP subscribers
File numbers: 8663 C12 200905995, 8621 C12 01/00, 8663 C12 200402892, 8663 B2 200316101, and 8663 C12 200717738

2009-06-04 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-194-1 Corrections to paragraphs 24 and 30 of Call for comments – Nomadic VoIP E9-1-1 service, Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-194, 15 April 2009.
File number: 8663-C12-200905995, 8621-C12-01/00, 8663-C12-200402892, 8663-B2-200316101, and 8663-C12-200717738

2009-04-15 - Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-194 Call for comments – Nomadic VoIP E9-1-1 service
Registration date: 15 May 2009
Deadline for submission of comments: 14 September 2009
File number:    8663-C12-200905995, 8621-C12-01/00, 8663-C12-200402892, 8663-B2-200316101, and 8663-C12-200717738

2007-12-07 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-125 CRTC Interconnection Steering Committee - Non-consensus report on a functional architecture for the implementation of nomadic VoIP E9-1-1 service in Canada. Reference: 8621-C12-01/00, 8663-C12-200402892, 8663-B2-200316101 and 8663-C12-200717738.

2007-04-12 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-22 The Commission approves the CRTC Interconnection Steering Committee report recommending the minimum guidelines for establishing an IP-to-IP interconnection, in order to facilitate the exchange of pertinent information for satisfying the requirements of the Minimum Message Set. Reference: 8621-C12-01/00 and 8663-C12-200402892.

2006-11-16 - Telecom Circular CRTC 2006-10 Access-independent VoIP services pursuant to Order in Council P.C. 2006-1314.

2006-09-21 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-60 The Commission approves the recommendations in the CRTC Interconnection Steering Committee Emergency Services Working Group (ESWG) Consensus Report ESRE042, ESWG 12-month Consensus Report on Nomadic VoIP Technical and Operating Impediments to 9-1-1/E9-1-1 Service Delivery in Canada , and requests the ESWG to file, within six months of the date of this Decision, a functional architecture for the implementation of VoIP E9-1-1 service in Canada. Reference: 8621-C12-01/00, 8663-C12-200402892 and 8663-B2-200316101.

2006-09-01 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-53 Reconsideration of Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol. Reference: 8663-C12-200605587 and 8663-C12-200402892.

2006-08-30 Telecom Cost Order CRTC 2006-9 The Commission approves an application for costs by the Canadian Association of the Deaf with respect to its participation in the CRTC Interconnection Steering Committee Accessibility Issues Ad-Hoc Working Group. Reference: 8663-C12-200402892 and 4754-266.

2006-06-16 - Telecom Cost Order CRTC 2006-7 The Commission approves an application for costs by ARCH Disability Law Centre with respect to its participation in the CRTC Interconnection Steering Committee Accessibility Issues Ad-Hoc Working Group. Reference: 8663-C12-200402892 and 4754-265.

2006-05-10 - Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-6 Reconsideration of Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol , Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28. Reference: 8663-C12-200605587, 8663-C12-200402892.

2006-03-16 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-13 IP-to-IP interconnection - Follow-up to Decision 2005-28. Reference: 8621-C12-01/00 and 8663-C12-200402892.

2006-03-16 - Telecom Decisison CRTC 2006-12 Message relay service in a VoIP environment - Follow-up to Decision 2005-28. Reference: 8621-C12-01/00 and 8663-C12-200402892.

2005-12-20 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-73 Consensus report on 9-1-1/E9-1-1 services provided to fixed/non-native VoIP subscribers. Reference: 8663-C12-200402892 and 8621-C12-01/00.

2005-10-20 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-61 The Commission approves a CRTC Interconnection Steering Committee final consensus report, which sets out the minimum requirements for customer notification regarding the availability, characteristics, and limitations of the 9-1-1/E9-1-1 service offered with local voice communication service over Internet Protocol. Reference : 8663-C12-200402892.

2005-08-18 - Telecom Costs Order CRTC 2005-4 The Commission approves the application for costs by the Consumer Groups with respect to its participation in the proceeding initiated by Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, 7 April 2004.

2005-08-08 - Telecom Costs Order CRTC 2005-1 The Commission approves the application for costs by the British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of BCOAPO et al., for its participation in the proceeding initiated by Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol , Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, 7 April 2004.

2005-08-08 - Telecom Costs Order CRTC 2005-2 The Commission approves the application for costs by ARCH: A Legal Resource Centre for Persons with Disabilities, for its participation in the proceeding initiated by Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol , Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, 7 April 2004.

2005-06-30 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28-1 The Commission is correcting the winback rule set out in paragraph 260 of Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol , Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28, 12 May 2005. Reference: 8663-C12-200402892.

2005-05-12 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol. Reference: 8663-C12-200402892.

2005-04-04 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-21 Emergency service obligations for local VoIP service providers. Reference: 8663-C12-200402892 and 8663-B2-200316101.

2004-07-22 - Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2-1 Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol – Amendment to dates for public consultation. Reference: 8663-C12-200402892 and 8663-B2-200316101.

Section 1c) Correspondence to Parties

2008-07-28 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Comwave Telecom Inc. - Re: Emergency service obligations of loca VoIP service providers

2008-05-05 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description:  Letter addresed to Comwave Telecom Inc. - Re: Emergency Service obligations of local VoIP service providers

2005-12-12 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to CRTC Interconnection Steering Committee - Accessibiity Issues Working Group - Re: VoIP Implementation - CISC Accessibility Issues Ad-hoc Working Group - Request for Extension of Reporting Deadline to 31 January 2006

2005-08-19 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Implementation of Emergency service obligations for local VoIP service providers, Telecom Decision, 4 April 2005 (Decision 2005-21)

2005-08-04 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to CRTC Interconnection Steering Committee - Business Process Working Group - Re: Privacy Safeguard Issues Report - Request for Extension

2005-06-16 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to CRTC Interconnection Steering Committee - R: VoIP MRS Report - Request for extension

2004-09-08 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Parties to PN 2004-2 - Re: Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol, 7 April 2004, as amended (Public Notice 2004-2)

2004-08-27 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Parties to PN 2004-2 - Re: Stenography services at the Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol (VoIP) public consultation

2004-08-19 - Commission Correspondence - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Correspondence addressed to Parties to Telecom Public Notice 2004-2 - Re: PN 2004-2 - Amended Procedures

2004-07-28 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Parties to PN 2004-2 - Re: Organization and conduct of the public consultation for PN 2004-2

2004-07-28 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Parties - Re: PN 2004-2 - Request from Microcell Telecommunications Inc. to amend procedures

2004-07-23 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Parties to PN 2004-2 - Re: PN 2004-2 - Request from Microcell Telecommunications Inc. to amend procedures

2004-05-18 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to The Greenlining Institute - Re: Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2 - Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol, 7 April 2004

2004-04-22 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Parties to Telecom Public Notice 2004-2 - Re: PN 2004-2 - Amended Procedures

2004-04-16 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Parties - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, 7 April 2004 (PN 2004-2) - Request for Amended Procedures

Section 1d) Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Alcatel Canada Inc. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Yak Communications (Canada) Inc. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to ARCH (A Legal Resource Centre for Persons with Disabilities) - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to AT&T Global Services Canada Co. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to B.C. Public Interest Advocacy Centre - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Bell West Inc. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Call-Net Enterprises Inc. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA) - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications Pricing - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Aliant Telecom Inc. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Saskatchewan Telecommunications - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - French Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Télébec, société en commandite - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Comwave Telecom Inc. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Cybersurf Corp. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to EastLink Telephone - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to FCI Broadband - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Government of Ontario (Ministry of Economic Development and Trade) - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to WorldCom (Canada) Ltd. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Microcell Solutions Inc. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to MTS Allstream Inc. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to New North Networks Ltd. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Nortel Networks - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Northwestel Inc. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to O.N.Telecom - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Pulver.com - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Vidéotron Télécom ltée (Québécor Média inc.) - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to RipNET Limited - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Rogers Communications Inc. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Shaw Cablesystems - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to TELUS Communications Inc. (TCI) - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU) - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to UTC Canada - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Vonage Holdings Corp. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Xit Telecom Inc. - Re: Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol - Interrogatories

Section 4a) Correspondence to the Commission

2008-09-26 - Comwave Telecom Inc.
Description:  The purpose of this letter is to supplement Northern 911's letter dated September 18, 2008 to which Comwave, Primus and Vonage contributed.
Document:  957828.pdf - 377KB

2008-06-27 - Comwave Telecom Inc.
Description:  Comwave hereby files its confidential representations in reply to the Commission staff's confidential letter under you signature and dated June 5,2008 concerning the emergency service obligations of local VoIP service providers.
Document: 922411.zip - 2558KB

2006-01-31 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: I am pleased to enclose for the Commission’s consideration the final report of the CISC Accessibility Issues Ad-hoc Working Group (AIWG).
Document: 587178.zip - 203KB

2005-10-31 - Emergency Services Working Group
Description: Enclosed please find the report from the Emergency Services Working Group on the technical and operational issues that impede 9-1-1/E9-1-1 service delivery when local VoIP service is offered on a fixed/non-native basis as requested in Telecom Decision 2005-21 paragraph 73.
Document: 051031.zip - 31KB

2005-06-03 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: Without prejudice to its right to appeal or present a petition to the Governor in Council with respect to the decision, TELUS Communications Inc. (TELUS) requests that the Commission clarify what TELUS believes is an error in the restatement of the local winback rules in paragraph 260 of Telecom Decision 2005-28
Document: 050603.doc - 38KB

2004-08-30 - Northwestel Inc.
Description: Northwestel is in receipt of YTG’s letter dated August 27th in which YTG continues to request that Northwestel respond to a number of interrogatories that were addressed to it by YTG on August 16th, 2004.
Document: 040830.doc - 63KB

2004-08-27 - Yukon Government
Description: The Yukon Government is in receipt of a letter from Northwestel Inc, dated August 23, 2004, providing the Commission with responses to requests from the Yukon Government for disclosure and further responses to interrogatories, and wishes to make the following comments.
Document: 040827.doc - 28KB

2004-08-23 - Primus Telecommunications Canada
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in its letter, dated 28 July 2004, Primus hereby submits its response.
Document: 040823.doc - 74KB

2004-08-19 - SaskTel
Description: Regarding the interrogatories addressed to SaskTel from Cybesurf, I apologize for the delay in responding to our note of 16 August 2004 .
Document: 040819.doc - 2KB

2004-08-18 - Nortel Networks
Description: Please be advised that Nortel Networks has no record of having previously received Cybersurf Corp. interrogatories posed to us as per Mr. Tacit's email below.
Document: 040818.doc - 6KB

2004-08-18 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: With regard to the email below, please be advised that Rogers did not previously receive the interrogatories attached thereto and was, therefore, unaware of the existence of the interrogatories.
Document: 040818.doc - 11KB

2004-08-18 - Vonage Holdings Corp.
Description: Vonage joins Rogers Communications in requesting that responses be provided no earlier than Wednesday, September 8 th , 2004
Document: 040818.doc - 6KB

2004-08-17 - Johnston & Buchan on behalf of UTC Canada
Description: This is in response to your letter of August 16, 2004 noting the failure of some 45 registered parties to respond to your interrogatories
Document: 040817.doc - 307KB

2004-08-16 - Nelligan O'Bian Payne on behalf of Cybersurf Corp.
Description:We request that responses to the Cybersurf interrogatories be provided by Ontario by August 23, 2004 .
Document: 040816.doc - 2KB

2004-08-16 - New North Networks Ltd.
Description: Please be advised that NEW NORTH   NETWORKS has not previously received the interrogatories attached to this e-mail.   Nevertheless, we are prepared to submit responses if the Commission so requests.
Document: 040816.doc - 5KB

2004-08-16 - Ministry of Economic Development and Trade
Description: Please be advised that the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade has no record of ever having received the interrogatories posed to the Government of Ontario that are attached to Mr. Tacit's email below.
Document: 040816.doc - 1167KB

2004-08-16 - Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Cybersurf requests that the Commission order these parties to provide responses forthwith to the interrogatories posed to them by Cybersurf.
Document: 040816_1.doc - 1166KB

2004-07-27 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of Consumer Groups
Description: The Consumer Groups are in receipt of a letter dated 23 July 2004 from Microcell Telecommunications Inc. (Microcell) requesting an extension for the response to interrogatories for the above-noted proceeding
Document: 040727.doc - 127KB

2004-07-27 - NorthwesTel Inc.
Description: Northwestel Inc. is in receipt of a letter dated 23 July 2004 from Microcell Telecommunications Inc. requesting an extension for the response to interrogatories for the above proceeding to August 11, 2004
Document: 040727.doc - 63KB

2004-07-26 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission’s directions in its correspondence dated 23 July 2004, TELUS hereby advises the Commission of its concurrence with Microcell Solutions’ request
Document: 040726.doc - 28KB

2004-07-26 - Xit Telecom
Description: In accordance with the procedures set fort the letter of the Commission dated 23 July 2004, Xit telecom Inc. on its behalf and on behalf of Xittel telecommunications inc. (Xit telecom) submits that it does not oppose the request for an extension requested by Microcell
Document: 040726.doc - 90KB

2004-07-26 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of a letter dated 23 July 2004 from Microcell Telecommunications Inc. (Microcell) requesting an extension for the response to interrogatories for the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 040726_2.doc - 462KB

2004-07-26 - Québécor Média
Description: Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI) is in receipt of a letter dated 23 July, 2004 from Microcell Telecommunications Inc. requesting an extension for the response to Interrogatories for the above proceeding to August 11, 2004.
Document: 040726.doc - 36KB

2004-07-26 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. is in receipt of a letter dated July 23, 2004 from Microcell requesting a five calendar day extension for the filing of interrogatory responses in the PN 2004-2 proceeding
Document: 040726.doc - 133KB

2004-07-26 - FCI Broadband
Description: FCI is in receipt of a letter from Microcell dated 23 July 2004 requesting an extension of five calendar days to the date for the filing of interrogatory responses in this proceeding.
Document: 040726.pdf - 57KB

2004-07-26 - Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Description: Call-Net Enterprises Inc. is in receipt of a letter dated 23 July, 2004 from Microcell Telecommunications Inc. requesting an extension for the response to Interrogatories for the above proceeding to August 11, 2004
Document: 040726.doc - 28KB

2004-07-23 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. is in receipt of a letter from Microcell requesting a five calendar day extension to the date for the filing of interrogatory responses in this proceeding
Document: 040723.doc - 67KB

2004-07-23 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: CAIP is in support of Microcell's request for an extension of the time frame to respond to interrogatories for Telecom Public Notice 2004-2.
Document: 040723.pdf - 45KB

2004-07-23 - Microcell Telecommunications Inc.
Description: Microcell Telecommunications Inc., on behalf of itself and its subsidiaries, Microcell Solutions Inc. and Inukshuk Internet Inc. (Inukshuk), sent a letter earlier today requesting a short extension to response to interrogatories period
Document: 040723_1.doc - 40KB

2004-07-23 - Microcell Telecommunications Inc.
Description: Microcell Telecommunications Inc. , on behalf of itself and its subsidiaries, Microcell Solutions Inc. and Inukshuk Internet Inc. (Inukshuk), hereby formally requests a five calendar day extension to the Response to Interrogatories period of the above-mentioned proceeding.
Document: 040723.doc - 53KB

2004-06-16 - Association des centres d'urgence 9-1-1 du Québec (ACUQ)
Description: L'Association des centres d'urgences 9-1-1 du Québec (ACUQ) présentera un mémoire sur le VOIP au plus tard le 18 juin. L'ACUQ souhaite se conformer aux directives du CRTC et à cette fin désire connaître la liste complète des parties auxquelles elle doit aussi faire parvenir son mémoire.
Document: 040616.htm - 1KB

2004-05-18 - Canadian Cable Television Association
Description: The Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA) is writing this letter to request a change in the dates for the public consultations to be held in the VoIP proceeding
Document: 040518.doc - 168KB

2004-05-12 - The Greenlining Institute
Description:  Regulating Voice-Over Internet Protocol
Document: 040512.pdf - 953KB

2004-04-20 - Rothschild & Co. on behalf of RipNET Limited
Description: Rothschild & Co. files these comments relating to the above-noted proceeding on behalf of its client, RipNET Limited
Document: 040420.pdf - 47KB

2004-04-20 - FCI Broadband
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in the public notice noted above, FCI Broadband is in receipt of the letter from Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications, TELUS Communications Inc., TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. and Télébec, société en commandite (the ILECs) dated April 15, 2004 seeking an extension and amendment to the procedures in paragraphs 31 to 40 of PN 2004-2 in order to provide for additional time to prepare and file responses and supporting material
Document: 040420.doc - 65KB

2004-04-20 - Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Cybersurf Corp.
Description: This submission is being filed on behalf of Cyberusurf Corp. and its various affiliates and subsidiaries (collectively Cybersurf) in response to the Ms. Soehn's letter dated 16 April 2004 in this proceeding.
Document: 040420.doc - 61KB

2004-04-20 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter of 16 April 2004, the following is Allstream Corp.'s response to requests filed by Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications, TELUS Communications Inc., TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies) as well as by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC).
Document: 040420.doc - 254KB

2004-04-20 - Ministry of Economic Development and Trade
Description: Ontario would not object to a reasonable modification of the process set out in Public Notice 2004-2
Document: 040420.doc - 30KB

2004-04-20 - O.N.Telcom
Description: O.N.Telcom is in receipt of the Commission's letter dated April 16, 2004 in respect of the above noted matter wherein the Commission notes that on 15 April 2004, the Commission received letters filed jointly by he Companies and by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) requesting modifications to the process set out in PN 2004-2. O.N.Telcom has reviewed these submissions and offers the following comments.
Document: 040420.doc - 39KB

2004-04-20 - Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Description: Call-Net is providing the following comments on this application pursuant to the Commission's letter dated 16 April 2004.
Document: 040420.doc - 37KB

2004-04-20 - Xit Télécom Inc.
Description: Xit télécom Inc., en son nom et au nom de télécommunications Xittel inc. (Xit télécom) offre les commentaires suivants relatifs à la proposition des procédures à l'AP 2004-2 présentée par les grandes ESLT et par le Centre pour la protection de l'intérêt public.
Document: 040420.doc - 104KB

2004-04-20 - Québécor Média
Description: Dans sa lettre du 16 avril 2004, le Conseil demande aux parties intéressées de se prononcer, avant le 20 avril 2004, 14h00 HNE, sur les modifications soumises, le 15 avril dernier conjointement par Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications, TELUS Communications Inc., TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. et la société en commandite Télébec (les Compagnies) ainsi que par le Centre pour la défense de l'intérêt public (PIAC)
Document: 040420.doc - 57KB

2004-04-20 - Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada
Descrition:  In response to the Commission's letter dated 16 April 2004, the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, a registered party to Telecom Public Notice 2004-2, wishes to indicate its support for the concerns and issues raised by the Public Interest Advocacy Center (PIAC) as well as those raised by the incumbent telephone companies regarding what is described as the truncated public hearing process, set out in P.N. 2004-2
Document: 040420.htm - 3KB

2004-04-19 - Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board
Description: The Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board (OAB) is submitting this correspondence in response to the application made to the CRTC by the "Companies" dated 15 April 2004. We note that in this application the Companies have proposed changes to the Commissions procedure in this matter. Included as part of these changes are extended deadlines for comments with the public consultation dates of May 19th and 20th remaining the same
Document: 040419.doc - 51KB

2004-04-19 - The British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description: We would ask that BCOAPO et al be allowed to intervene and note that no prejudice could result to any party from allowing an intervention one day late.
Document: 040419.pdf - 40KB

2004-04-16 - Microcell Solutions Inc.
Description: Microcell Solutions Inc. (Microcell) is in receipt of a letter from Aliant Telecom, Bell Canada, MTS Communications, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, TELUS Communications Inc., TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the ILECs) to the Commission dated April 15, 2004, in which the ILECs request amendments to the procedures set out in paragraphs 31 to 40 of PN 2004-2 to, among other things, allow sufficient time for the preparation and filing of evidence
Document: 040416.doc - 43KB

2004-04-16 - Canadian Cable Television Association
Description: The CCTA is in receipt of an application, dated 15, 2004, filed jointly by the ILECs seeking to delay and amend the procedures set out in paragraphs 31 to 40 of PN 2004-2
Document: 040416.pdf - 192KB

2004-04-15 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications, TELUS Communications Inc., TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: This application is filed jointly by Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications, TELUS Communications Inc., TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. and Télébec, société en commandite (the "Companies"). Pursuant to Rules 8 and 27 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, the Companies request that the procedures set out in paragraphs 31 to 40 of PN 2004 2 be amended to allow sufficient time for the preparation and filing of evidence and to allow for such other procedures as may be required.
Documents: 040415_1E.doc - 1006KB - 040415_1F.doc - 1039KB

2004-04-15 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) has registered as a party to this proceeding, and intends, in the course of its participation, to assist in the coordination and presentation of the views of residential telephone subscribers in relation to the implementation of the appropriate regulatory framework.
Documen: 040415.wpd - 128KB

2004-03-08 - Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board
Description: CLEC obligations to provide end user subscriber access to local 9-1-1 services and the reselling of local voice services to Internet Service Providers
Document: 040308.doc - 80KB

2004-01-12 - Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Description: Call-Net has recently become aware of an announcement by Primus Canada (Primus) concerning the provision of local telephone service under the TalkBroadband brand (see attached).
Document: 040112.doc - 32KB

Section 4b) Comments

2004-09-20 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) submit a revision to the Companies' 18 June 2004 comments, page 29.
Document: 040920_2.zip - 568KB

2004-06-22 - Borden Ladner Gervais au nom de l'Union des municipalités du Québec (UMQ)
Description: Conformément à l’article 33 des procédures modifiées relatives à l’Avis public 2004-02, vous trouverez ci-joint copie du sondage effectué pour le compte de l’Union des municipalités du Québec (l’« UMQ ») en 2003, dont il est fait état au paragraphe 12 du Mémoire que nous vous avons transmis le 18 juin dernier au nom de l’UMQ.
Document: 040622.zip - 182KB

2004-06-21 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: In accordance with the procedures established by the Commission in Public Notice 2004-2 as modified by the Commission's letter of April 22, 2004, the following constitutes the comments of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers in the above-referenced proceeding.
Document: 040621.pdf - 226KB

2004-06-18 - Edmonton Police Service
Description: In regards to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, Regulatory Framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol, The City of Calgary has submitted their comments on the Commission's preliminary views.
Document: 040618.doc - 55KB

2004-06-18 - The Greenlining Institute
Description: The Greenlining Institute (Greenlining) files these comments relating to the above-noted proceeding
Document: 040618.doc - 112KB

2004-06-18 - Xit Telecom Inc.
Description: This intervention is made pursuant to the procedures set fort in Public Notice 2004-2 as amended by letter of the Commission of April 22, 2004 by Xit telecom Inc. on its behalf and on behalf of Xittel telecommunications inc. (Xit telecom)
Document: 040618.doc - 169KB

2004-06-18 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out by the Commission in PN 2004-2, as amended by the Commission’s letter to the parties of 22 April 2004, TELUS Communications Inc., on behalf of itself and TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. herewith files its Comments.
Document: 040618.zip - 547KB

2004-06-18 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in the above-noted public notice and as modified by the Commission's letter dated 22 April 2004, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the attached comments on the Commission preliminary views and other matters set out in the public notice.
Document: 040618.doc - 542KB

2004-06-18 - Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Cybersurf Corp.
Description: The attached Comments are provided on behalf of Cybersurf Corp. and its various affiliates and subsidiaries (collectively Cybersurf), pursuant to paragraph 33 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, 7 April 2004, as amended by the Commission’s letter dated 22 April 2004.
Document: 040618.zip - 54KB

2004-06-18 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedure established in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, paragraph 33, as revised in the Commission’s letter dated April 22, 2004, Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. (Cogeco) is filing its comments on the Commission’s preliminary views and on other matters set out in this public notice
Document: 040618.doc - 166KB

2004-06-18 - Northwestel Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the above Public Notice, Northwestel Inc. submits its initial comments, with regard to the Commission’s preliminary views on the regulatory framework for VoIP services and on matters associated with how VoIP services might affect the unique regulatory regime and telecommunications market in northern Canada, attached hereto
Document: 040618.zip - 52KB

2004-06-18 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 33 of the above noted public notice, as amended by the Commission's letter dated 22 April 2004, Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) hereby file the attached comments.
Document: 040618.zip - 759KB

2004-06-18 - The City of Calgary
Description: The City of Calgary is a registered participant in the above noted proceeding. In accordance with the procedure outlined in PN 2004-2 and amended by The CRTC on 2004 April 22, The City of Calgary herewith files its comments.
Document: 040618.zip - 530KB

2004-06-18 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) provides the attached Comments pursuant to the procedures established in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2 as modified by Commission letter dated 22 April 2004.
Document: 040618.zip - 728KB

2004-06-18 - Quebecor Media on behalf of Vidéotron Télécom ltée and Vidéotron ltée
Description: On behalf of Vidéotron Télécom ltée and Vidéotron ltée, Quebecor Média inc. (QMI) is pleased to file with the Commission its comments regarding the regulatory framework for voice communications services using Internet Protocol.
Document: 040618.zip - 2758KB

2004-06-18 - Microcell Solutions Inc.
Description: Microcell, on behalf of itself and its affiliate Inukshuk Internet Inc., is pleased to provide herein our comments on the Commission’s preliminary views expressed in PN 2004 and on other matters pertinent to the regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol
Document: 040618.doc - 71KB

2004-06-18 - Swidler Berlin Shereff Friedman on behalf of Vonage Holdings Corp.
Description: Please find attached Vonage Holdings Corp.'s comments in the above-referenced proceeding.
Document: 040618.pdf - 124KB

2004-06-18 - Papazian Heisey Myers on behalf of AT&T Global Services Canada Co.
Description: The attached submissions are being filed on behalf of AT&T Global Services Canada Co. (“AT&T Canada”) in response to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2 and in accordance with the amended procedures issued by the CRTC in a letter dated 22 April 2004.
Document: 040618.zip - 218KB

2004-06-18 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the amended procedures, Primus is pleased to submit its comments on the Commission’s preliminary views and other matters that are pertinent to the regulatory framework for voice communications using IP.
Document: 040618.doc - 132KB

2004-06-18 - Borden Ladner Gervais on behalf of Comwave Telecom Inc.
Description: Please find attached the comments of our client Comwave Telecom in this proceeding.
Document: 040618.zip - 101KB

2004-06-18 - FCI Broadband
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in the public notice noted above, FCI submits its comments herewith.
Document: 040618.pdf - 57KB

2004-06-18 - Investment Dealers Association of Canada on behalf of Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications Pricing
Description: Please find enclosed the comments of the Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications Pricing.
Document: 040618.pdf - 1666KB

2004-06-18 - Ministry of Economic Development and Trade - Government of Ontario
Description: Please find attached Ontario's submission in respect of this proceeding.
Document: 040618.zip - 398KB

2004-06-18 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: Dans une lettre émise le 22 avril 2004, le Conseil révisait la procédure et accordait une prorogation du délai pour déposer des observations au plus tard le 18 juin 2004.
Document: 040618.doc - 76KB

2004-06-18 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) is pleased to provide its comments pursuant to the above-noted public notice.
Document: 040618.doc - 270KB

2004-06-18 - Yak Communications (Canada) Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in PN 2004-2, as amended by the Commission's letter of April 22, 2004, Yak Communications is pleased to submit the following comments.
Document: 040618.zip - 244KB

2004-06-18 - Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures et out in the above captioned Public Notice, as amended by the Commission’s letter of April 22, 2004, Call-Net Enterprises Inc. is providing the attached comments.
Document: 040618.zip - 283KB

2004-06-18 - ARCH
Description: Please find attached ARCH’s Submissions in the above referenced matter in both MS Word and Text formats, filed in accordance with paragraph 33 of the above referenced Public Notice, as amended by the Commission on 22 April, 2004
Document: 040618.zip - 52KB

2004-06-18 - Greater Vancouver Regional District
Description: The Greater Vancouver Regional District, on behalf of itself and the other members of the British Columbia 9-1-1 Service Providers Association, submits their comments on public notice 2004-02.
Document: 040618.doc - 45KB

2004-06-18 - WorldCom Canada Ltd. (MCI Canada)
Description: In accordance with the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2 as modified by the Commission’s letter of April 22, 2004, WorldCom Canada Ltd., doing business as MCI Canada, is pleased to submit the attached comments on the issues raised in this proceeding.
Document: 040618.doc - 625KB

2004-06-18 - Nortel Networks
Description: Nortel Networks on behalf of itself files the attached comments and appendices. This is in accordance with the procedures set out by the Commission as outlined in the above public notice and amended in the Commission’s letter of April 22, 2004
Document: 040618.zip - 3923KB

2004-06-18 - Johnston & Buchan on behalf of UTC Canada
Description: Please find attached the comments of UTC Canada in this proceeding.
Document: 040618.zip - 225KB

2004-06-18 - O.N.Telcom
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in the above noted Public Notice, as amended by the Commission in its letter dated April 22, 2004, the following constitutes O.N.Telcom’s submission with respect to matters arising from the issues raised in the Public Notice.
Document: 040618.doc - 40KB

2004-06-18 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of Consumer Groups
Description: The Consumers' Association of Canada (CAC), National Anti-Poverty Organization (NAPO), and L'Union des Consommateurs (The Consumer Groups) submit the following preliminary comments in response to the above-noted Public Notice.
Documen: 040618.doc - 147KB

2004-06-18 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in the above noted public notice, the CCTA files its comments on the Commission's preliminary views and related issues respecting the regulatory framework for voice over IP (VoIP).
Document: 040618.pdf - 112KB

2004-06-18 - Rosenbloom & Aldridge on behalf of Telecommunications Workers Union
Description: These are the comments of the TWU submitted in accordance with Telecom Public Notice 2004-2 and subsequent directions on procedure.
Document: 040618.pdf - 324KB

2004-06-18 - Borden Ladner Gervais au nom de l'Union des municipalités du Québec (UMQ)
Description: L’Union des municipalités du Québec (UMQ) soumet au Conseil de la radiodiffusion et des télécommunications canadiennes les commentaires suivants sur l’avis public de télécom 2004-2 Cadres de réglementation régissant les services de communication vocale sur protocole Internet, ou téléphonie sur protocole Internet (TPI).
Document: 040618.zip - 27KB

2004-06-18 - Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board (OAB)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Public Notice 2004-2, the Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board is pleased to submit the attached comments on The Commissions preliminary views set out in this public notice.
Document: 040618.doc - 112KB

2004-06-18 - Rothschild & Co. on behalf of RipNET Limited
Description: Rothschild & Co. files these comments relating to the above-noted proceeding on behalf of RiNET Limited
Document: 040618.pdf - 102KB

2004-06-18 - Association des centres d'urgence 9-1-1 du Québec (ACUQ)
Description: L’Association des centres d’urgence 9-1-1 du Québec (ACUQ) soumet au Conseil de la radiodiffusion et des télécommunications canadiennes (le Conseil ou CRTC) les commentaires suivants sur l’avis public de télécom 2004-2 du 7 avril 2004 Cadre de réglementation régissant les services de communication vocale sur protocole Internet tel que modifié par la lettre du Conseil du 22 avril 2004VoIP
Document: 040618.zip - 1606KB (Revised)

2004-06-18 - The British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of BCOAPO et al.
Description: We are the solicitors for BCOAPO et al.. Our clients represent subscribers to local residential telephone service in British Columbia. They commend the Commission for initiating a review of this emerging telecommunications platform, and wish to comment in response to the Public Notice
Document: 040618.doc - 46KB

2004-06-17 - New North Networks Ltd.
Description: New North Networks Ltd. would make the following comments and positions in respect to the Public Notice.
Document: 040617.pdf - 177KB

2004-06-17 - Shaw Pittman on behalf of Pulver.com
Description: Enclosed for filing in the above-referenced proceeding is the Comments of pulver.com
Document: 040617.pdf - 916KB

2004-06-16 - Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police
Description: I am writing on behalf of the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police in response to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2 – Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol.
Document: 040616.doc - 52KB

2004-06-15 - Alcatel Canada Inc.
Description: Alcatel’s operations in Canada include its main global centre for data product development, as well as sales offices across Canada. Alcatel has also made a corporate commitment to Canadian innovation by locating one of only six global research centers in Ottawa
Document: 040615.doc - 42KB

2004-06-08 - Union des municipalités du Québec
Description:  L'Union des municipalités du Québec a été informée des conséquences de l'implantation des nouvelles technologies permettant les communications via le protocole Internet.
Document: 040608.pdf - 198KB

"List of comments by alphabetical order"

Dalibard, Joёl-David
Ley, Mile
Mulaire, Alain
O'Keefe, M.
Seed, David
Smith, C.
Walberg, Sean

Section 4c) Interrogatories

2004-07-16 - Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board (OAB)
Description: The Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board (OAB) is submitting Interrogatories to the following Interested parties to this Public Notice.
Document: 040716.zip - 23KB

2004-07-16 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of Consumer Groups
Description: Attached are interrogatories submitted by the Consumer Groups to other parties, as indicated, in respect of the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 040716.zip - 108KB

2004-07-16 - Yak Communications (Canada) Inc.
Description: Yak Communications (Canada) Inc. (Yak) hereby submits the attached interrogatories.
Document: 040716.zip - 50KB

2004-07-16 - Alcatel Canada Inc.
Description: Alcatel’s Interrogatories related to Regulatory Framework for Voice communication services using Internet Protocol, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2
Document: 040716.doc - 33KB

2004-07-16 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in the above-noted proceeding, Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. hereby files its interrogatories addressed to other parties in this proceeding
Document: 040716.zip - 87KB

2004-07-16 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 34 of the amended procedures for Public Notice 2004-2, the attached interrogatories are being addressed on behalf of Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) to parties who filed submissions on 18 June 2004.
Document: 040716.doc - 1196KB

2004-07-16 - City of Calgary (Fire Department)
Description: Please find enclosed, for filing with the Commission, our Interrogatories
Document: 040716.zip - 582KB

2004-07-16 - Yukon Government
Description: Attached are interrogatories to NorthwesTel submitted by the Yukon government for CRTC PN 2004-02.
Document: 040716.zip - 62KB

2004-07-16 - Investment Dealers Association of Canada on behalf of Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications Pricing
Description: Please find enclosed interrogatories of the Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications Pricing
Documen: 040716.pdf - 4711KB

2004-07-16 - ARCH
Description: Attached are the interrogatories of ARCH: A Legal Resource Centre for Persons with Disabilities which are filed in accordance with the procedures established by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, as modified by the Commission’s letter of 22 April 2004.
Document: 040716.zip - 26KB

2004-07-16 - Xit Telecom inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures set fort in Public Notice 2004-2 as amended by letter of the Commission of April 22, 2004, Xit telecom Inc. on its behalf and on behalf of Xittel telecommunications inc. (Xit telecom) is transmitting the following interrogatories to interested parties for the above noted proceeding
Document: 040716.zip - 88KB

2004-07-16 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Attached please find the interrogatories of Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers). A machine readable copy of this submission is provided by internet e-mail to the Commission and interested parties.
Document: 040716.zip - 224KB

2004-07-16 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Attached are the Interrogatories posed by Cybersurf Corp. to various parties in the above-cited proceeding.
Document: 040716.zip - 162KB

2004-07-16 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out by the Commission in its letter dated 22 April 2004 regarding revised filing dates for the above-noted public notice, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) addresses the attached interrogatories to the following parties
Document: 040716.doc - 565KB

2004-07-16 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: The CCTA submits the attached interrogatories addressed to various interested paties.
Document: 040716.zip - 70KB

2004-07-16 - Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Description: Please find attached Call-Net’s interrogatories to the parties for the above noted proceeding
Document: 040716.zip - 49KB

2004-07-14 - The British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description: Enclosed please find interrogatories directed to you in these proceedings from BCOAPO et al.
Document: 040714.zip - 55KB

2004-07-09 - Association des centres d'urgence 9-1-1 du Québec
Description: Here are the questions submitted by Association des centres d'urgence 9-1-1 du Québec in respect of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2.
Document: 040709.zip - 183KB

Section 4d) N/A

Section 4e) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure

2004-08-16 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to PN 2004-2 and the revised procedures set out in the Commission staff letter dated 28 July 2004, MTS Allstream Inc. submits the attached requests for public disclosure and further responses to the interrogatories identified in the attachment
Document: 040816.doc - 504KB

2004-08-16 - City of Calgary
Description: The City of Calgary is a registered participant in the above noted proceeding. Please find enclosed, for filing with the Commission, our request for further responses from The Companies (Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Telebec).
Document: 040816.zip - 516KB

2004-08-16 - Yukon Government
Description: The following requests for further disclosure by the Yukon Government have been submitted to New North Networks pursuant to the revised procedure defined by the Public Notice, and copies are being provided to interested parties
Document: 040816_1.doc - 25KB

2004-08-16 - Yukon Government
Description: The following requests for further disclosure by the Yukon Government have been submitted to Northwestel pursuant to the revised procedure defined by the Public Notice, and copies are being provided to interested parties.
Document: 040816.doc - 27KB

2004-08-16 - ARCH
Description: In accordance with the procedures established by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, as modified by the Commission’s letters of 22 April 2004 and 28 July 2004, ARCH submits the following requests for further responses to the interrogatories which it posed to parties on 16 July 2004
Document: 040816.doc - 74KB

2004-08-16 - Xit Telecom
Description: In accordance with the procedures set fort in Public Notice 2004-2 as amended by the Commission, Xit telecom Inc. on its behalf and on behalf of Xittel telecommunications inc. (Xit telecom) submits the following requests for public disclosure in Attachment 1 and further responses to the to the interrogatories identified in Attachment 2
Document: 040816.doc - 224KB

2004-08-16 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Sakstachewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 34 c) of the procedures for Public Notice 2004-2 as amended by the Commission's 28 July 2004 letter, the attached requests for further responses to interrogatories are being filed on behalf of Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies).
Document: 040816_3.doc - 255KB

2004-08-16 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: Pursuant to PN 2004-2 and the procedures set out at paragraph 34 of the Commission's letter of April 22, 2004, as amended by the Commission's letter of July 28, 2004, the CCTA submits its requests for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure
Document: 040816.zip - 70KB

2004-08-16 - Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board
Description: The Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board is submitting further Interrogatories to the following Interested Parties
Document: 040816.zip - 38KB

Section 4f) Replies to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure

2004-09-07 - Vonage Holdings Corp.
Description: Per the request of the CRTC, please find Vonage Holdings Corp.'s revised response.
Document: 040907.pdf - 29KB

2004-09-07 - Vonage Holdings Corp.
Description: Please find attached the further responses of Vonage's Holdings Corp. and Exhibits.
Document: 040907.zip - 666KB

2004-08-26 - Border Ladner Gervais on behalf of Comwave Telecom Inc.
Description:  Regulatory Framework for Voice Communications Services Using Internet Protocol.   On August 23  our client Comwave Telecom Inc., filed an additional reply to the interrogatory of Bell Canada (the "Companies".)  Please find a revised document with amended numbering.
Document:  040826.pdf - 7KB

2004-08-24 - New North Networks Ltd.
Description: It has been brought to my attention that we have not responded to the interrogatories from Bell Canada. Please find attached my late responses as requested by Bell Regulatory.
Document: 040824.doc - 132KB

2004-08-24 - Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Public Notice 2004-2 as amended by the Commission’s letter of 28 July 2004, Call-Net Enterprises Inc. (Call-Net) hereby provides its answer to requests for further interrogatory responses.
Document: 040824.doc - 35KB

2004-08-23 - Northwestel Inc.
Description: PN 2004-02: Regulatory Framework for Voice Communication Services Using Internet Protocol. Northwestel's Response to Deficiencies Claims.
Document: 040823.doc - 79KB

2004-08-23 - Papazian Heisey Myers on behalf of AT&T Global Services Canada Co.
Description: Hereby files the attached response to MTS Allstream Inc.'s request for further responses to the following interrogatories.
Document: 040823.pdf - 50KB

2004-08-23 - Border Ladner Gervais on behalf of Comwave Telecom Inc.
Description:  The attached document is in response to the letter of August 16, 2004 of Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, sociét en commande (collectively, the Companies) to the Commission requesting further responses to interrogatories.
Document:  040823.zip - 76KB

2004-08-23 - Investment Dealers Association of Canada on behalf of Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications Pricing
Description: The following constitutes the reply of the Coalition to the OAB.
Document: 040823.doc - 154KB

2004-08-23 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: The following replies to these requests are filed by TELUS in accordance with the procedure established by the Commission in PN 2004-2, as amended by the Commission's letters to the parties of 22 April 2004 and 28 July 2004.
Document: 040823.doc -  87KB

2004-08-23 - New North Networks
Description: Response to Requests for Disclosure by the Yukon Government to New North Networks.
Document: 040823.doc - 130KB

2004-08-23 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Document: Pursuant to paragraph 34 d) of the procedures for Public Notice 2004-2 as amended by the Commission's 28 July 2004 letter, SaskTel provides the attached responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed in respect of the following interrogatories.
Document: 040823.doc - 67KB

2004-08-23 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 34 d) of the procedures for Public Notice 2004-2 as amended by the Commission's 28 July 2004 letter, the attached responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories (Attachment 1) and for public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed (Attachment 2) are being filed on behalf of Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies).
Document: 040823.doc - 349KB

2004-08-23 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA) submits its reply to requests for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed.
Document: 040823.zip - 129KB

2004-08-23 - Primus Telecommunications Canada
Description: Please consider the following as supplemental to Primus' earlier response to MTS Allstream's disclosure request.
Document: 040823_1.doc - 5KB

Section 4g) Reply comments

2004-10-13 - Northwestel Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the above noted Public Notice, Northwestel respectfully submits its Reply Argument attached herewith.
Document: 041013.zip - 50KO

2004-10-13 - Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board (OAB)
Description: On behalf of the Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board (OAB) I am filing the attached correspondence containing our final comments on the Voice over the Internet Public Notice 2004-2
Document; 041019.doc - 32KB

2004-10-13 - City of Calgary
Description: The City of Calgary is a registered participant in the above noted proceeding. In accordance with the procedure outlined in PN 2004-2 and amended by The CRTC on 2004 April 22, The City of Calgary herewith files its final reply comments.
Document: 041013.zip - 527KB

2004-10-13 - FCI Broadband
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in the public notice noted above, FCI Broadband submits its final reply comments herewith.
Document: 041013.pdf - 63KB

2004-10-13 - WorldCom Canada Ltd.(MCI Canada)
Description: In accordance with the procedures established in the Commission PN 2004-2 as modified by the Commission's letters of April 22 and July 28, 2004, World Com Canada is pleased to submit the attached reply comments on the issues raised in this proceeding.
Document: 041013.pdf - 94KB

2004-10-13 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in the above-noted public notice and as amended by the Commission's letter of 22 April 2004, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the attached reply comments on the Commission preliminary views and other matters set out in the PN 2004-2.
Document: 041013.doc - 665KB

2004-10-13 - Xit Telecom Inc.
Description: These reply comments are provided pursuant to the procedures set forth in Public Notice 2004-2 by Xit telecom Inc. on its behalf and on behalf of Xittel telecommunications inc. (Xit telecom).
Document: 041013.doc - 232KB

2004-10-13 - Vonage Canada Corp.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in the above noted public notice, as amended by PN 2004-2-1, Vonage is pleased to submit the following reply comments.
Document: 041013.zip - 89KB

2004-10-13 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 40 of the above-noted public notice, as amended by the Commission's letter dated 22 April 2004, Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) hereby file the attached Reply Comments.
Document: 041013_1.doc - 630KB

2004-10-13 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) provides the enclosed reply comments pursuant to the procedures established in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, as modified by Commission letter dated 22 April 2004
Document: 041013.zip - 54KB

2004-10-13 - Alcatel Canada Inc.
Description: Alcatel would like to restate its original position submitted on June 15, Alcatel maintains that the CRTC would forbear in economic aspect of VoIP regulations, in contract to the CRTC's preliminary position expressed in CRTC 2004-2.
Document: 041013.pdf - 95KB

2004-10-13 - Microcell Solutions Inc.
Description: On behalf of Microcell and our subsidiaries, Microcell Solutions Inc. and Inukshuk Internet Inc., we are pleased to submit the attached reply comments as part of the proceeding initiated by PN 2004-2.
Document: 041013.pdf - 162KB

2004-10-13 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, 7 April 2004, as modified from time to time, Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus) hereby submits its reply comments
Document: 041013.doc - 137KB

2004-10-13 - Yak Communications
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in PN 2004-2, as amended by the Commission’s letter of April 22, 2004, Yak Communications (Canada) Inc. (Yak) is pleased to submit the following reply comments.
Document: 041013.zip - 212KB

2004-10-13 - ARCH
Description: Please find attached ARCH’s reply comments in the above referenced Public Notice. These are filed in accordance with paragraph 40 of the above referenced Public Notice, as modified by the Commission’s letter of 22 April 2004.
Document: 041013.zip - 26KB

2004-10-13 - Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Cybersurf Corp.
Description: The attached Reply is provided on behalf of Cybersurf and its various affiliates and subsidiaries, pursuant to paragraph 40 of PN 2004-2, 7 April 2004, as amended by the Commission's letter dated 22 April 2004.
Document: 041013.zip - 66KB

2004-10-13 - Papazian Heisey Myers on behalf of AT&T Global Services Canada Co.
Description: Papazian Heisey Myers on behalf of AT&T Global Services Canada Co. (AT&T Canada) hereby files these reply comments pursuant to the Commission’s amended procedures dated 22 April July 2004 concerning the conduct of PN 2004-2
Document: 041013.doc - 60KB

2004-10-13 - Yukon Government
Description: The Yukon Government submits the following comments pursuant to the revised schedule and conduct of the proceedings defined in Public Notice 2004-2, as amended.
Document: 041013.doc - 71KB

2004-10-13 - Ontera
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in the above noted Public Notice, as amended by the Commission in its letter dated April 22, 2004, the following constitutes Ontera’s Reply Comments with respect to matters arising from the issues raised in the Public Notice
Document: 041013.doc - 45KB

2004-10-13 - Quebecor Media Inc. on behalf of Vidéotron ltée and Videotron Telecom Ltd.
Description: In accordance with the procedures specified in PN 2004-2, as amended by Commission letter dated 22 April 2004, Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its subsidiaries Vidéotron ltée and Videotron Telecom Ltd. (collectively, QMI), is pleased to provide the enclosed reply comments on the subject of the regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol
Document: 041013.zip - 46KB

2004-10-13 - Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications Pricing
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by PN 2004-2, enclosed please find the reply comments for the Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications Pricing.
Document: 041013.pdf - 195KB

2004-10-13 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out by the Commission in PN 2004-2, as amended by the Commission’s letter to the parties of 22 April 2004, TELUS Communications Inc., on behalf of itself and TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc., herewith files its Reply Comments
Document: 041013.zip - 63KB

2004-10-13 - UTC Canada
Description: Please find attached the reply comments of UTC Canada in this proceeding.
Document: 041013.zip - 19KB

2004-10-13 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of Consumer Groups
Description: With respect to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), The Consumers’ Association of Canada (CAC), National Anti-Poverty Organization (NAPO), and L’Union des Consommateurs; collectively referred to herein as the “Consumer Groups” have enclosed the Final Reply Comments
Document: 041013.zip - 111KB

2004-10-13 - Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA)
Description: Pursuant to PN 2004-2 and the procedures set ou at paragraph 34 of the Commission's letter of April 22, 2004, as amended by the Commission's letter of July 28, 2004, the CCTA submits its reply comments to the Commission respecting the regulatory framework for voice over IP
Document: 041013.pdf - 381KB

2004-10-13 - Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Description: Please find attached Call-Net’s reply comments for the above noted proceeding
Document: 041013.zip - 43KB

2004-10-13 - Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada (CEP)
Description: Please find attached hereto copy of CEP’s submissions in the above noted matter
Document: 041013.zip - 20KB

2004-10-12 - Nortel Networks
Description: As Chief Technology Officer of Nortel Networks, I am pleased to offer reply comments to the Commission on this very important proceeding
Document: 041012.doc - 60KB

Section 5 - Responses to interrogatories

2004-09-16 - Bell West
Description: Bell West files these responses to interrogatories received from ARCH related to the above noted proceeding
Document: 040916.zip - 13KB

2004-09-15 - Papazian Heisey Myers on behalf of AT&T Global Services Canada Co.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission’s letter dated 08 September 2004 concerning further responses to interrogatories filed in connection with the above noted proceeding, PAPAZIAN HEISEY MYERS, on behalf of AT&T Global Services Canada Co. (AT&T Canada), hereby confirms that, because AT&T Canada does not have authority from the copyright holders to satisfy CRTC’s request for public distribution of the following reports referenced in their 18 June 2004 submission, paragraph 23, it will forego reliance on these reports
Document: 040915.zip - 217KB

2004-09-15 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter dated 8 September 2004, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) hereby files the supplemental response to The Canadian Cable Television Association’s interrogatory dated 16 July 2004
Document: 040915.zip - 32KB

2004-09-15 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS Communications Inc. (TELUS) herewith provides the revised responses to interrogatories called for in the Commission’s letter of 8 September 2004 addressing requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure
Document: 040915.zip - 25KB

2004-09-15 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Pursuant to a request for further responses dated September 8, 2004, Shaw hereby submits a revised response to interrogatory Shaw(CRTC)16Jul4-1a)i).
Document: 040915.zip - 16KB

2004-09-15 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are providing the supplemental response to The Companies(CCTA)16Jul04-2 PN 2004-2 pursuant to the Commission's ruling dated 8 September 2004. Saskatchewan Telecommunications is filing a separate response.
Document: 040915.zip - 259KB

2004-09-14 - Vonage Holdings Corp.
Description: Please find attached Vonage's responses as requested by the Commission's letter dated September 8, 2004.
Document: 040914.zip - 68KB

2004-08-19 - WorldCom Canada Ltd. (MCI Canada)
Description: Further to Bell Canada's letter of August 16, 2004, please find attached a revised response to MCI Canada(CRTC)16Jul04-2
Document: 040819.pdf - 34KB

2004-08-18 - Johnston & Buchan on behalf of UTC Canada
Description: Please find attached UTC Canada's responses to interrogatories posed by the Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications Pricing, which were inadvertently omitted from UTC Canada's filing on August 11, 2004.
Document: 040818.zip - 224KB

2004-08-17 - Pulver.com
Description: Please find attached the supplemental interrogatory responses of pulver.com.
Document: 040817.pdf - 69KB

2004-08-16 - Papazian Heisey Myers on behalf of AT&T Global Services Canada Co.
Description: Two additional interrogatory responses are attached and are being filed on behalf of AT&T Global Services Canada Co. (AT&T Canada) in response to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, Regulatory Framework for Voice Communication Services Using Internet Protocol (PN 2004-2).
Document: 040816.zip - 17KB

2004-08-13 - Rosenbloom & Aldridge on behalf of Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU)
Description: Please find enclosed for filing with the Commission, the responses of the TWU to interrogatories directed to the TWU in this proceeding.
Document: 040813.pdf - 173KB

2004-08-12 - Northwestel Inc.
Description:  Pursuant to the above-noted PN, Northwestel attaches herewith revised responses to the interrogatories.
Document: 040812.pdf - 705KB

2004-08-12 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: The CCTA hereby submits the attached responses to interrogatories addressed from PRIMUS.
Document: 040812.zip - 49KB

2004-08-12 - LondonConnect Inc.
Description: LondonConnect would like to note that it did not file a submission pursuant to PN 2004-2 and therefore will not be submitting responses addressed to it by ARCH and XIT Telecom.
Document: 040812.doc - 22KB

2004-08-11 - New North Networks Ltd.
Description: Please find our responses to your Interrogatories as requested by Fax 16 July 2004.
Documetn: 040811.pdf - 237KB

2004-08-11 - Northwestel Inc.
Description:  On July 16, 2004, Northwestel received interrogatories from the Commission and various other parties. Pursuant to the above noted PN, Northwestel files herewith its responses to these interrogatories
Document: 040811.pdf - 9036KB

2004-08-11 - Ministry of Economic Development and Trade on behalf of Government of Ontario
Description: Pursuant to the Procedures established by the Commission in the above noted proceeding, the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, on behalf of Government of Ontario, hereby files its responses to the interrogatories filed by Pimus and the CRTC.
Document: 040811_2.zip - 152KB

2004-08-11 - Ministry of Economic Development and Trade on behalf of Government of Ontario
Description: Pursuant to the Procedures established by the Commission in the above noted proceeding, the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, on behalf of Government of Ontario, hereby files its responses to the interrogatories filed by the CRTC.
Document: 040811_1.zip - 148KB

2004-08-11 - Ministry of Economic Development and Trade on behalf of Government of Ontario
Description: Pursuant to the Procedures established by the Commission in the above noted proceeding, the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, on behalf of Government of Ontario, hereby files its responses to the interrogatories.
Document: 040811.zip - 71KB

2004-08-11 - Vonage Holdings Corp.
Description: Please find attached Vonage's responses to interrogatories filed by various parties.
Documen: 040811.zip - 134KB

2004-08-11 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission in PN 2004-2, as amended by the Commission’s letters to the parties of 22 April 2004 and 28 July 2004, TELUS Communications Inc. (TELUS or the Company) is filing herewith its responses to the interrogatories
Document: 040811.zip - 1177KB

2004-08-11 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: The Canadian Association of Inernet Providers (CAIP) is pleased to respond to interrogatories posed by the Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications Pricing on July 16, 2004.
Document: 040811_2.pdf - 234KB

2004-08-11 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: The Canadian Association of Inernet Providers (CAIP) is pleased to respond to interrogatories posed by The City of Calgary on July 16, 2004.
Document: 040811_1.pdf - 234KB

2004-08-11 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: The Canadian Association of Inernet Providers (CAIP) is pleased to respond to interrogatories posed by the CRTC on July 16, 2004.
Document: 040811.pdf - 262KB

2004-08-11 - Quebecor Media on behalf of Vidéotron Ltée and Vidéotron Telecom Ltd.
Description: Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its subsidiaries Vidéotron Ltée (VL) and Videotron Telecom Ltd (VTL), (collectively, QMI) is pleased to provide the enclosed responses to interrogatories received from the Commission and other interested parties on the issues raised in PN 2004-2
Document: 040811.zip - 86KB

2004-08-11 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with the above-noted public notice and pursuant to the revised procedures set out in the Commission staff letter dated 28 July 2004, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the attached interrogatory responses
Document: 040811.zip - 635KB

2004-08-11 - City of Calgary
Description: Please find enclosed, for filing with the Commission, our responses to interrogatories received from Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. and Xit Telecom Inc
Document: 040811.zip - 524KB

2004-08-11 - Borden Ladner Gervais on behalf of Comwave Telecom Inc.
Description: The attached interrogatory responses are being filed by Comwave in response to PN 2004-2 and in accordance with the amended procedures raised by the CRTC in a letter dated July 28, 2004.
Document: 040811.zip - 333KB

2004-08-11 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to section 39 of the Telecommunications Act, SaskTel submits the following responses to interrogatories in confidence to the Commission for the reasons set out therein
Document: 040811.zip - 1792KB

2004-08-11 - Cogeco Cable Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission’s July 28, 2004 letter, please find attached the responses of Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. (Cogeco) to the following Interrogatories
Document: 040811.zip - 104KB

2004-08-11 - Greater Vancouver Regional District
Description: Enclosed are the comments from the Greater Vancouver Regional District in response to the questions raised by Primus Telecommunications Canada.
Document: 040811.zip - 12KB

2004-08-11 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 34 b) of the amended procedures for Public Notice 2004-2, and as amended by the Commission's 28 July 2004 letter, Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) submit their responses to interrogatories.
Document: 040811.doc - 467KB - 040811_1.zip - 1993KB - 040811_2.zip - 2126KB - 040811_3.zip - 1840KB - 040811_4.zip - 6494KB - 040811_5.zip - 4453KB

2004-08-11 - Shaw Cablesystems
Description: Please find attached the Response to Interrogatories relating to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2.
Document: 040811.doc - 81KB

2004-08-11 - Microcell Telecommunications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures established in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, as amended by the Commission’s letter dated 28 July 2004, please find enclosed the response of Microcell Telecommunications Inc. to interrogatories received from the following parties
Document: 040811.zip - 119KB

2004-08-11 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in the above-mentioned public notice, Primus hereby submits its responses to these interrogatories
Documen: 040811.zip - 102KB

2004-08-11 - FCI Broadband
Description: Attached hereto are FCI Broadband’s responses to each of the above-referenced interrogatories. An Abridged Version of FCI Broadband’s responses to the Commission’s interrogatories of 16 July 04 are delivered to Interested Parties to PN 2004-2 herewith and a Confidential version of the FCI Broadband replies to the Commission’s interrogatories are filed only with the Commission
Document: 040811.zip - 115KB

2004-08-11 - UTC Canada
Description: Please find attached the interrogatory responses of UTC Canada in this proceeding
Document: 040811.zip - 34KB

2004-08-11 - Bell West Inc.
Description: Please find attached Bell West’s responses to interrogatories for the proceeding noted above.
Document: 040811.zip - 63KB

2004-08-11 - Ontera (formerly O.N.Telcom)
Description: Please find attached Ontera’s interrogatory responses for the above noted proceeding.
Document: 040811.zip - 162KB

2004-08-11 - Pulver.com
Description: Pulver.com fles there responses to interrogatories received in the above-captioned proceeding.
Document: 040811.pdf - 185KB

2004-08-11 - ARCH
Description: Please find attached ARCH’s Responses to Interrogatories in the above referenced matter in both MS Word and Text formats. These are filed in accordance with paragraph 33 of the above referenced Public Notice, as amended by the Commission on 22 April, 2004, as set out in the modified schedule of July 29, 2004
Document: 040811.zip - 57KB

2004-08-11 - Yak Communications (Canada) Inc. (Yak)
Description: Please find attached Yak Communications (Canada) Inc.’s (“Yak”) responses to interrogatories for the above noted proceeding.
Document: 040811.zip - 2663KB

2004-08-11 - EastLink
Description: Please find attached the following Interrogatory responses of EastLink:
Document: 040811.zip - 99KB

2004-08-11 - Investment Dealers Association of Canada on behalf of Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications Pricing
Description: In accordance with the procedures set forth in PN 2004-2 and as amended by Commission's letter of July 28,2004, enclosed, please find, filed on behalf of the Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications Pricing, responses to interrogatories.
Document: 040811.pdf - 2439KB

2004-08-11 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of Consumer Groups
Description: Attached are responses to interrogatories submitted to the Consumer Groups by other parties, as indicated, in respect of the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 040811.zip - 163KB

2004-08-11 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: The attached interrogarory responses are being filed on behalf of Rogers in accordance with the amended procedures issued by the CRTC in a letter dated 28 July 2004.
Document: 040811.zip - 2346KB

2004-08-11 - Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Cybersurf Corp.
Description: The attached interrogatory responses are provided on behalf of Cybersurf and its various affiliates and subsidiaries pursuant to paragraph 34 of PN 2004-2, 7 April 2004, as amended by the Commission's letters dated 22 April 2004 and 28 July 2004.
Document: 040811.zip - 413KB

2004-08-11 - WordCom Canada Ltd. (MCI Canada)
Description: In accordance with the procedures established by the Commission in PN 2004-2 as modified by the Commission's letters of April 22, 2004 and July 28, 2004, please find attached the interrogatory responses of WorldCom Canada Ltd. (MCI Canaca) in this proceeding.
Document: 040811.pdf - 135KB

2004-08-11 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: Pursuant to PN 2004-2 and the procedures set out at paragraph 34 of the Commission's letter of April 22, 2004, as amended by the Commission's letter of July 28, 2004, the CCTA submits the attached responses to interrogatories
Document: 040811.zip - 343KB

2004-08-11 - Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Description: Please find attached Call-Net’s response interrogatories for the above noted proceeding. Call-Net is also filing in confidence with the Commission Call-Net(CRTC)16Jul04-1, and sending an abridged version to the interested parties.
Document: 040811.zip - 200KB

2004-08-11 - Rosenbloom & Aldridge on behalf of Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU)
Description: Please find enclosed for filing with the Commission, the responses of the Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU) to interrogatories directed to the TWU in this proceeding.
Document: 040811.pdf - 215KB

2004-08-11 - The British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description: Enclosed please find BCOAPO et al’s responses to your interrogatories in these proceedings
Document: 040811_4.zip - 20KB

2004-08-11 - The British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description: Enclosed please find BCOAPO et al’s responses to your interrogatories in these proceedings
Document: 040811_3.zip - 20KB

2004-08-11 - The British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description: Enclosed please find BCOAPO et al’s responses to your interrogatories in these proceedings.
Document: 040811_2.zip - 20KB

2004-08-11 - NorthernTel Limited Partnership
Description: NorthernTel, Limited Partnership (NorthernTel) is in receipt of a letter from ARCH: A Legal Resource Centre for Persons with Disabilities (ARCH) in which they have posed Interrogatories to the Parties Listed in Attachment 1.
Document: 040811.doc - 163KB

2004-08-11 - Association des centres d'urgence 9-1-1 du Québec
Description: L’Association des centres d'urgence 9-1-1 du Québec files these responses to
interrogatories received from the following interested parties relating to the above-noted proceeding
Document: 040811.doc - 59KB

2004-08-11 - The British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description: Enclosed please find BCOAPO et al’s responses to your interrogatories in these proceedings.
Document: 040811_1.zip - 20KB

2004-08-11 - The British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description: Enclosed please find BCOAPO et al’s responses to your interrogatories in these proceedings.
Document: 040811.zip - 14KB

2004-08-11 - AT&T Global Services Canada Co.
Description: AT&T Global Services Canada Co. (AT&T Canada) has received interrogatories from the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) and (8) eight other parties.
Document: 040811.zip - 112KB

2004-08-10 - Alcatel Canada Inc.
Description: With respect to the interrogatories directed to Alcatel related to CRTC 2004-02, Alcatel is pleased to respond per the attached comments inter-leaved with the original questions.
Document: 040810.zip - 23KB

2004-08-10 - The British Columbia Public Advocacy Centre
Description: Enclosed please find BCOAPO et al’s responses to your interrogatories in these proceedings.
Document: 040810.zip - 27KB

2004-08-08 - Xit Telecom
Description: In accordance with the procedures set fort in Public Notice 2004-2 as amended by letter of the Commission of July 28, 2004, Xit telecom Inc. on its behalf and on behalf of Xittel telecommunications inc. (Xit telecom) is transmitting the following responses to interrogatories it received from the Commission and various other parties.
Document: 040808.zip - 99KB

2004-08-06 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (Execulink) is in receipt of a letter from ARCH: A Legal Resource Centre for Persons with Disabilities (ARCH) in which they have posed interrogatories to parties listed in Attachment 1 to their letter
Document: 040806.doc - 58KB

2004-08-06 - Nortel Networks
Description: Interrogatories responses enclosed.
Documen: 040806.zip - 72KB

2004-08-06 - Ontario Telecommunications Association (OTA)
Description: The Ontario Telecommunications Association (OTA) is in receipt of a letter from ARCH: A Legal Resource Centre for Persons with Disabilities (“ARCH”) in which they have posed interrogatories to parties listed in Attachment 1 to their letter.
Document: 040806.doc - 96KB

2004-08-06 - Rothschild & Co. on behalf of RipNET Limited
Description: Rothschild & Co. on behalf of RipNET Limited, files these responses to interrogatories received from the Commission relating to the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 040806.pdf - 166KB

2004-08-06 - Rothschild & Co. on behalf of RipNET Limited
Description: Rothschild & Co. on behalf of RipNET Limited, files these responses to interrogatories received from the Association des centres d'urgence 9-1-1 du Québec relating to the above-noted proceeding
Document: 040806_1.pdf - 109KB

2004-08-05 - Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board
Description: Attached are the Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Boards responses to Interrogatories from Primus Canada and Xit Telecom.
Document: 040805.zip - 17KB

Section 8a) Costs

2006-04-21 - TELUS Communications Company (TCC)
Description: TELUS is in receipt of an application for costs from the Canadian Association of the Deaf (CAD) filed April 7, 2006 in relation to the CISC working group activities referenced above.
Document: 615967.pdf - 17KB

2006-04-19 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada , Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Limited Partnership (the Companies)
Description:  Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada , Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Limited Partnership (collectively, the Companies), are in receipt of an application for costs from the Canadian Association of the Deaf (CAD), dated 7 April 2006 .
Document: 614352.doc - 263KB

2006-04-07 - Canadian Association of the Deaf (CAD)
Description: The Canadian Association of the Deaf (CAD), in accordance with Rule 44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, applies for Costs with respect to its participation in the CISC Accessibility Issues Ad-Hoc Working Group (CISC AIWG) mandated by Decision 2005-28
Document: 612510.pdf - 83KB

2006-03-13 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) is in receipt of ARCH’s application for costs in respect of the above noted process, dated 2 March 2006.
Document: 602324.doc - 45KB

2006-03-13 - TELUS Communications Company (TCC)
Description: TELUS is in receipt of an application for costs from ARCH, filed March 2, 2006 in relation to the CISC working group activities reference above.
Document: 602302.pdf - 17KB

2006-03-10 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Limited Partnership (the Companies)
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Limited Partnership (collectively, the Companies), are in receipt of an application for costs from the ARCH Disability Law Centre (ARCH), dated 2 March 2006.
Document: 602207.doc - 253KB

2006-03-02 - ARCH
Description: ARCH Disability Law Centre, in accordance with Rule 44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, applies for Costs with respect to its participation in the CISC Accessibility Issues Ad-Hoc Working Group (CISC AIWG) mandated by Decision 2005-28
Document: 599763.zip - 105KB

2005-06-22 - The British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description: Telus took objection to our earlier cost application of November 10, 2004 on the basis that it was premature in view of the extension of the proceeding occasioned by the Aliant labour dispute.
Document: 050622.pdf - 381KB

2005-01-05 - ARCH
Description: ARCH writes this letter in response to the answers we received to our application for costs (of November 12, 2004) from Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) dated November 30, 2004.
Document: 050105.doc - 59KB

2004-11-30 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Discription: Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies), are in receipt of an application for costs from ARCH, received 16 November 2004. The Companies do not object to either ARCH's entitlement to costs or the amount claimed.
Document: 041130.doc - 443KB

2004-11-30 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies), are in receipt of an application for costs from the Consumer Groups, dated 19 November 2004. The Companies do not object to either the Consumer Groups' entitlement to costs or the amount claimed.
Document: 041130_1.doc - 435KB

2004-11-29 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS is in receipt of an application for costs in the above-noted proceeding from The Consumer Groups (being comprised of The Consumers’ Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty Organization, and l’Union des Consommateurs) dated 19 November 2004
Document: 041129.doc - 46KB

2004-11-29 - ARCH
Description: ARCH writes this letter in response to the answers we received to our application for costs (of November 12, 2004) in the above proceeding
Document: 041129.doc - 61KB

2004-11-22 - Quebecor Media
Description: QMI does not challenge ARCH’s application for costs as it relates to ARCH’s interest and participation in the PN 2004-2 proceeding. We strongly disagree, however, with ARCH’s proposed formula to recover these costs.
Document: 041122.doc - 38KB

2004-11-22 - Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA)
Description: The CCTA is in receipt of an application of an application for costs dated November 12, 2004, filed pursuant to s.44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, on behalf of ARCH, in respect of its participation in PN 2004-2
Document: 041122.pdf - 43KB

2004-11-22 - Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA)
Description: The CCTA is in receipt of an application for costs dated November 19, 2004, filed pursuant to s.44 of CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, by the Public Interest Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumer Groups in respect of their collective participation in PN 2004-2.
Document: 041122.pdf - 35KB

2004-11-19 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of Consumer Groups
Description: Pursuant to s.44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, The Consumer Groups hereby apply for an award of costs in respect of their joint intervention in this proceeding
Document: 041119.doc - 129KB

2004-11-17 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS Communications Inc. is in receipt of an application for costs in the above-noted proceeding from ARCH: A Legal Resource Centre for Persons With Disabilities (ARCH) dated 12 November 2004
Document: 041117.doc - 30KB

2004-11-12 - ARCH
Description: ARCH: A Legal Resource Centre for Persons with Disabilities, in accordance with section 44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, applies for costs in its participation in the proceeding initiated by Regulatory framework for voice communications services using Internet Protocol, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2.
Document: 041112.pdf - 1115KB

2004-11-03 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS Communications Inc. (TELUS) is in receipt of an application for costs in the above-noted proceeding from BCOAPO et al. dated 15 October 2004.
Document: 041103.doc - 29KB

2004-11-02 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: The Companies are in receipt of an application for costs from the BC Public Interest Advocacy Centre for costs, dated 15 October 2004. The BC Public Interest Advocacy Centre indicated that its application is on behalf of the BC Old Age Pensioners' Organization, the Council of Senior Citizens' Organizations of BC, the federated anti-poverty groups of BC, the Senior Citizen's Association of BC, West End Seniors' Network, End Legislated Poverty, and the Tenants Rights Action Coalition (collectively, BCOAPO et al).
Document: 041102_1.doc - 434KB

2004-10-15 - British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre (BCOAPO et al)
Description:  The BC Public Interest Advocacy Centre applies on behalf of the British Columbia Old Age Pensioners' Organization et al for costs in these proceedings and have enclosed our costs application with this letter.
Document: 041015.pdf - 581KB

Section 8b) Others

2006-11-29 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description:  The attached tariff items has been final approved in Order in Council PC 2006-1314, 2006-11-09
Document: 702083.pdf - 228KB

2006-11-23 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description:  Bell Aliant multireserved pages as per Telecom Circular 2006-10.
Document: 693373.zip - 15KB

2006-11-23 - Bell Canada
Description:  Bell Canada Multireserved Pages as per Telecom Circular 2006-10
Document: 693369.zip - 15KB

2005-06-01 - Bell Canada
Description: Attached are approved Access Services Tariff (AST) associated with Tariff Notice Number
Document: 050601.pdf - 117KB

2005-07-04 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Shaw is in receipt of a letter from Cybersurf dated June 27, 2005 providing an intervention with respect to the revised tariff pages filed by Shaw pursuant to Decision 2005-28.
Document: 050704.pdf - 92KB

2005-06-29 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers is in receipt of an intervention on its June 2nd filing of revised tariff pages from Cybersurf Corp (Cybersurf) received on June 27, 2005.
Document: 050629.doc - 578KB

2005-06-27 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Cybersurf Corp. (Cybersurf) is providing this intervention with respect to the above cited tariff notice of Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) and tariff page filings of Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) and Shaw Cablesystems GP (Shaw).
Document: 050627.doc - 70KB

2005-06-10 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28, attached are revisions to the Link Arrangements for Interconnecting Canadian Carriers, Item 610.20 and Interconnection Arrangements for DSL Service Providers, Item 610.26 of SaskTel's Competitor Access Tariff (CRTC 21414).
Document: 050610.zip - 23KB

2005-06-01 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P
Description: Shaw Cablesystems G.P. ("Shaw") is filing revised third Party Internet Access (TPIA) tariff pages (Tariff CRTC 26300) removing any restriction prohibiting voice over internet portocol (VOIP) services from Shaw's TPIA tariff.
Document: 050601.zip - 131KB

2005-06-01 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers is filling revised Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) tariff pages (Tariff CRTC 20004) removing the existing restriction prohibiting IP-based voice telephony servce from Rogers' TPIA tariff.
Document: 050601.zip 60KB

2005-05-27 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: Attached is a revised courtesy copy of the Aliant tariff page being issued to give effect to the CRTC directives at paragraph 446 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28.
Document: 050527.doc - 33KB

Date modified:

2010-06-17