2006-09-01 - #: 8663-C12-200610924 - Public Notice 2006-12 - Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15
File using the On-line Services
Public Notice 2006-12 Schedule
Activities |
Deadline Dates |
Notice of intention to participate | 2006-09-11 |
Comments | 2006-09-22 |
Responses to interrogatories | 2006-09-15 |
Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure | 2006-09-21 |
Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure | 2006-09-27 |
Determinations for further information | 2006-10-06 |
Information to be filed pursuant to determination | 2006-10-12 |
Final comments | 2006-10-26 (revised) |
Reply comments | 2006-11-07 (revised) |
Section 1 - Commission Documents
a) Public Notices, Decisions, etc.
b) List of Interested Parties
c) Correspondence to Parties
d) Interrogatories
Section 2 - Documents from Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Allstream Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and TELUS Communications Company
a) Correspondence to the Commission
b) Comments
c) Interrogatories
d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure
e) Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure
f ) Information to be filed pursuant to determination
g) Final comments
h) Reply comments
Section 4 - Documents from parties
a) Correspondence to the Commission
b) Comments
c) Interrogatories
d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure
e) Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure
f ) Information to be filed pursuant to determination
g) Final comments
h) Reply comments
Section 5 - Responses to interrogatories
Section 8 - Miscellaneous Documents
a) Costs
b) Others
Section 1a) Public Notices, Decisions, etc.
2007-05-09 - Telecom Circular CRTC 2007-14 Status of certain proceedings in light of the Order in Council varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006‑15.
2007-05-09 Telecom Cost Order CRTC 2007-10 The Commission approves the application by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, on behalf of the Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization, with respect to their participation in the proceedings initiated by Proceeding to examine whether mobile wireless services should be considered to be in the same relevant market as wireline local exchange services with respect to forbearance, and related issues, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006‑9, 16 June 2006 and by Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006‑15, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006‑12, 1 September 2006. Reference: 8663‑C12‑200610924 and 4754‑289.
2007-03-07 - Telecom Cost Order CRTC 2007-2 The Commission approves the application for costs by l'Union des consommateurs with respect to its participation in the proceeding initiated by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12. Reference: 8663-C12-200610924 and 4754-281.
Section 1c) Correspondence to Parties
2006-11-01 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 - Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15 - Request to extend reply comments deadline
2006-11-01 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 - Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15 - Placement of certain aggregated information on the public record
2006-10-20 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 - Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15 - Placement of certain aggregated information on the public record
2006-10-18 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 - Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15 - Placement of certain aggregated information on the public record
2006-10-11 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 - Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15 - Request for modification to the schedule
2006-09-20 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 – Show cause re: Aggregating and publishing of certain information
2006-10-06 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re: Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15, Telecom Public Notice 2006-12 - Further responses to interrogatories
2006-09-01 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 - Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15 - Interrogatories
Section 2a) Correspondence to the Commission
2006-10-31 - Bell Canada
Description: Bell Canada (or the Company) is in receipt of a letter by TELUS Communications Company (TELUS) dated 27 October 2006 requesting a one-week extension to file reply comments in PN 2006-12.
Document: 685177.doc - 62KB
2006-10-31 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of letters dated October 30, 2006 from the Competitors and PIAC responding to TELUS' request for an extension in the deadline for filing Reply in the PN 2006-12 proceeding.
Document: 685144.pdf - 31KB
2006-10-31 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is in receipt of a letter from TELUS Communications Company (TELUS), dated 27 October 2006 , requesting an extension of one week to the deadline for filing reply comments in the above noted proceeding from 2 November 2006 to 9 November 2006.
Document: 685135.doc - 82KB
2006-10-27 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS requests an extension of one week for parties to fille their Reply Comments in the PN 2006-12 proceeding.
Document: 683930.pdf - 22KB
2006-10-06 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In PN 2006-12, the Commission set out a deadline of 19 October 2006 for parties to file (1) comments with regard to the market share loss threshold set out in Decision 2006-15 and (2) final comments with regard to the substitutability of mobile wireless services for local wireline services, as set out in PN 2006-9.
Document: 677110.pdf - 308KB
Section 2b) Comments (See also comments under PN 2006-9)
2006-10-03 - Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Attached is a revised version of the comments of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 675436.zip - 148KB
2006-09-28 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) received your letter, dated 20 September 2006 , which proposed that the following market data, aggregated on a national level, be placed on the public record
Document: 673440.doc - 61KB
2006-09-28 - Bell Canada
Description: This letter provides the comments of Bell Canada (or the Company) concerning the show cause letter dated 20 September 2006 in the above matter, in which Commission staff (Staff) proposed that the following market data, aggregated on a national level, be placed on the public record
Document: 673438.doc - 75KB
2006-09-28 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of a letter from Commission staff , dated 20 September 2006, requiring parties to show cause why the Commission should not place on the public record
Document: 673436.pdf - 40KB
2006-09-28 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is in receipt of a Commission staff letter dated 20 September 2006 requiring MTS Allstream to show cause, why the Commission should not publish on an aggregated basis certain information filed in confidence, pursuant to Section 39 of the Telecommunications Act , by parties of the Commission's proceeding initiated by Telecom Public Notice 2006-12
Document: 673422.doc - 81KB
2006-09-28 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Patnership
Description: The following represents the comments of Bell Aliant Regional Communications to the show cause letter dated 20 September 2006 in the above matter
Document: 673412.pdf - 99KB
No documents
Section 2d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure
2006-09-21 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Document: In accordance with paragraph 15 of Telecom Public Notice 2006-9 (PN 2006-9) and paragraph 20 of Telecom Public Notice 2006-12 (PN 2006-12), MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) requests public disclosure from Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, SaskTel and T é l é bec (Bell et al.) in regards to interrogatory The Companies(MTS Allstream)18Aug06-1 PN 2006-9.
Document: 669701.doc - 87KB
Section 2e) Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure
No documents
Section 2f) Information to be filed pursuant to determination
No documents
2006-10-26 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission in PN 2006-12, as modified by Commission's staff letter dated 11 October 2006, please find attached TELUS comments in response to PN 2006-12 and Final comments in response to PN 2006-9.
Document: 683914.zip - 136KB
2006-10-26 - Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: In accordance with paragraph 23 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006 12, as amended by Commission staff in a letter dated 11 October 2006, attached is the joint submission of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited partnership, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the Companies) in the above referenced proceedings.
Document: 683697.zip - 104KB
2006-10-26 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-9, as amended by paragraph 23 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 and as further amended by the Commission staff letter of 11 October 2006, MTS Allstream submits the following comments.
Document: 683674.doc - 195KB
2006-10-26 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: S askatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is party to the joint submission of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada , and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, The Companies), filed on this date in the above referenced proceedings
Document: 683638.zip - 44KB
2006-11-07 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission in PN 2006-12, as modified by Commission's staff letter dated 1 November 2006, please find attached TELUS Reply Comments in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 687405.pdf - 495KB
2006-11-07 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-9, as amended by paragraph 23 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 and as further amended by the Commission staff letter of 11 October 2006, MTS Allstream submits the following reply comments.
Document: 687402.doc - 156KB
2006-11-07 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: In accordance with paragraph 24 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, as amended by Commission staff in a letter dated 1 November 2006, attached is the joint submission of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) in the above referenced proceedings.
Document: 687375.doc - 428KB
Section 4a) Correspondence to the Commission
2006-10-30 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively , the Competitors) are in receipt of a letter from TELUS Communications Company (TELUS), dated October 27, 2006, requesting an extension of one week to the deadline for filing Reply Comments in the above noted proceeding from November 2 to November 9.
Document: 684933.doc - 795KB
2006-10-30 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the Consumer Groups) is in receipt of a letter dated October 27, 2006 from TELUS to the Commission requesting an extension of one week to file reply evidence in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 684658.doc - 12KB
2006-10-11 - Cogeco Cable Inc, Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description: The Competitors are in receipt of a letter from MTS Allstream dated 6 October 2006 to the CRTC requesting an extension of one week to the deadlines for the filing of comments (market share) and final comments (wireless) and reply comments.
Document: 677961.pdf - 41KB
Section 4b) Comments
2006-09-28 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable inc. ( Cogeco ) is in receipt of your letter, dated 20 September 2006 , requiring that each party show cause why the Commission should not publish on an aggregated basis certain information filed in confidence, pursuant to Section 39 of the Telecommunications Act , by parties as part of the Commission's proceeding initiated by PN 2006-12
Document: 673504.doc - 137KB
2006-09-28 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers hereby responds to the Commission's letter of 20 September 2006 requesting that those interested parties who filed responses to the Commission interrogatories dated 1 September 2006 show cause
Document: 673443.pdf - 61KB
2006-09-28 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: La présente expose les commentaires de Télébec concernant la demande de justification en date du 20 septembre 2006 relative à l'objet ci-dessus
Document: 673430.pdf - 31KB
Section 4c) Interrogatories
No documents
Section 4d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure
No documents
Section 4e) Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure
2006-09-20 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description: The Consumer Groups (Consumers' Association of Canada; National Anti-Poverty Organization and l'Union des consommateurs) are pleased to enclose their response to interrogatories of the Commission , in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 669880.zip - 225KB
Section 4f) Information to be filed pursuant to determination
No documents
2006-10-27 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus) is in receipt of Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, dated 1 September 2006. Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in PN 06-12, Primus hereby files its comments.
Document: 684721.doc - 147KB
2006-10-26 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 23 of Telecom Public Notice 2006-12, as amended by Commission staff letter dated October 11, 2006, Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors) hereby file the attached submission.
Document: 683606.zip - 214KB
2006-10-26 - Union des consommateurs
Description: L'Union des consommateurs dépose le présent document afin de soumettre des observations dans le cadre de l'avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12.
Document: 683560.doc - 174KB
2006-10-26 - FCI Broadband
Description: FCI Broadband files these comments with the Commission pursuant to the procedures set out in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-16.
Document: 683577.zip - 103KB
2006-10-26 - Access Communications Co-operative Limited
Description: Access is pleased to provide comments in the above-referenced proceeding to consider whether the market-loss thresholds established in Telecom Decision 2006-15 continue to be appropriate and to also address the issue of whether mobile wireless services should be considered part of the same relevant market as wireless local exchange services.
Document: 683583.doc - 105KB
2006-10-26 - Execulink Group Inc.
Description: In PN 2006-12, the Commission invited comments regarding changes to market share loss thresholds established in Forbearance from the regulation of retail local exchange services, Telecom Decision 2006-15.
Document: 683581.pdf - 19KB
2006-10-26 - EastLink
Description: Bragg Communications carrying on business as EastLink, hereby files its comments on Public Notice 2006-12.
Document: 683593.pdf - 136KB
2006-10-26 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the Consumer Groups) is pleased to enclose the Comments of the Consumer Groups in the above matter.
Document: 683917.zip - 261KB
2006-10-26 - Johnston and Buchan for UTC Canada
Description: Please find attached comments of UTC Canada regarding Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 - Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15.
Document: 683283.doc - 76KB
2006-10-26 - Canadian Cable Systems Alliance Inc. (CCSA)
Description: In PN 2006-12, the Commission invited comments regarding changes to the market share loss thresholds established in Forbearance from the regulation of retail local exchange services, Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Document: 683278.pdf - 163KB
2006-10-26 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: Le 1er septembre 2006, le Conseil publiait l'Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12. Au paragraph 23 de cet Avis, le Conseil indiquait que toutes les parties peuvent déposer auprès du Conseil et en signifier copie à toutes les autres parties des observations sur les questions concernant la perte de part de marché.
Document: 683263.zip - 155KB
2006-10-26 - Vonage Canada Corp.
Description: These are the comments of Vonage Canada Corp. In response to Telecom Public Notice 2006-12.
Document: 683234.pdf - 3189KB
2006-10-19 - Westport Telephone Company Limited o/a WTC Communications (WTC)
Description: The Westport Telephone Company Limited o/a WTC Communications (WTC) wishes to thank the Commission for the opportunity to submit its comments on Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12.
Document: 681210.doc - 54KB
2006-10-18 - Wightman Communications Ltd.
Description: Wightman supports the notion of market share forbearance criteria. It also supports the creation of definition of Local Forbearance Regions (LFR). Withtman supports these initiatives both both the residential and business markets.
Document: 680200.doc - 180KB
2006-11-07 - Vonage Canada Corp.
Description: This the reply of Vonage Canada, pursuant to Public Notice 2006-12, 1 September 2006. In this reply, Vonage responds to the comments submitted by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada and Saskatchewan Telecommunications and TELUS Communications Company.
Document: 687443.pdf - 1241KB
2006-11-07 - Johnston & Buchan for UTC Canada
Description: These reply comments are filed by the United Telecom Council of Canada (UTC Canada) in accordance with the procedures established by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, as amended by the Commission’s letter to interested parties dated November 1, 2006
Document: 687435.doc - 59KB
2006-11-07 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the Consumer Groups) is pleased to enclose the Reply Comments of the Consumer Groups in the above matter.
Document: 687393.zip - 110KB
2006-11-07 - Access Communications Co-operative Limited
Description: Access Communications Co-operative Limited (Access Communications) is hereby filing its reply comments in the above-referenced proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Document: 687379.doc - 101KB
2006-11-07 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 24 of Public Notice 2006-12, as amendedby the Commission Staff letters dated October 11, 2006 and November 1, 2006, the Competitors hereby file the attached Reply comments.
Document: 687372.zip - 89KB
Section 5) Responses to interrogatories
2006-11-08 - EastLink
Description: Please find attached EastLink’s responses to EastLink (CRTC) 1Sept06-101, which was inadvertently not included in the interrogatories filed by EastLink on September 15, 2006.
Document: 687867.zip - 93KB
2006-10-27 - Bell Canada
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-9, as amended by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 and further to Bell Canada's letters dated 15 September 2006, Bell Canada submit the attached revised interrogatories responses to the parties in this proceeding.
Document: 683923.zip - 37KB
2006-10-06 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers herewith files revised responses.
Document: 677550.zip - 60KB
2006-10-06 - Yak Communications (Canada) Inc.
Description: Yak Communications (Canada) Inc. (Yak) herewith is filing revised responses to interrogatory CRTC1Sept06-1.
Document: 676968.doc - 30KB
2006-10-05 - Bell Canada
Description: Attached is a revised version of Attachment 1 to Bell Canada(CRTC)18Aug06-2 PN 2006-9. At Commission Staff's request the Company has provided additional information pertaining to the Atlantic Provinces.
Document: 675952.doc - 77KB
2006-09-29 - Comwave
Description: In response to Commission's request for information, Comwave is hereby pleased to provide the attached responses to interrogatories.
Document: 675357.zip - 182KB
2006-09-29 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Cybersurf Corp. is submitting a revised abridged response to to interrogatory Cybersurf(CRTC)1Sept06-1 PN 2006-12 to the Commission and to interested parties.
Document: 674491.doc - 41KB
2006-09-29 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: This revised interrogatory response is filed in response to PN 2006-9 and related issues on behalf of TELUS Communications Company.
Document: 674249.zip - 35KB
2006-09-29 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers herewith files revisions to Attachment 2 to response to Rogers(CRTC)1Sept06-1 PN 2006-12
Document: 673851.pdf - 43KB
2006-09-29 - Bell Canada
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-9, as amended by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, and further to Bell Canada's letters dated 15 September 2006, Bell Canada (or the Company) submits the attached interrogatory responses to the parties in this proceeding
Document: 673770.zip - 49KB
2006-09-28 - Vonage Canada Inc.
Description: Further to the letter of 1 September 2006 from Scott Hutton, Vonage is pleased to provide the attached responses to interrogatory, requested by the Commission.
Document: 674473.pdf - 356KB
2006-09-28 - Yak Communications (Canada) Inc.
Description: Further to the Commission's letter of 1 September 2006, Yak Communications is pleased to provide the attached responses to interrogatories.
Document: 673494.zip - 58KB
2006-09-28 - Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: In accordance with the procedures established in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-9 as amended in paragraph 21 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) submit the attached response to MTS Allstream' s request for disclosure and further information to The Companies(MTS Allstream)18Aug06-1 PN 2006-9 .
Document: 672991.zip - 128KB
2006-09-27 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: On September 15, 2006 , pursuant to the process established by the Commission in PN 2006-12, Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) submitted responses to interrogatories received from the Commission on September 1, 2006
Document: 673004.doc - 30KB
2006-09-26 - Quebecor Media on behalf of Videotron Ltd.
Description: QMI, on behalf of itself and its subsidiary Videotron Ltd., is pleased to provide the enclosed revised responses to interrogatories received in the proceeding initiated by PN 2006-12.
Document: 672768.zip - 38KB
2006-09-25 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in paragraph 19 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, and further to MTS Allstream Inc.'s (MTS Allstream) letter dated 15 September 2006, MTS Allstream submits its response to interrogatory, MTS Allstream(CRTC)1Sept06-1 PN2006-12 and submits a revision to interrogatory, MTS Allstream(CRTC)1Sept06-5 PN2006-12
Document: 672577.doc - 80KB
2006-09-22 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 19 of PN 2006-12, and further to Rogers Communications Inc.'s letter dated September 15, 2006, Rogers is filing herewith through e-pass its responses to the interrogatories.
Document: 672150.zip - 95KB
2006-09-22 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 14 of PN 2006-9, as amended by PN 2006-12, at paragraph 19, and further to Rogers Communications Inc.'s letter dated September 15, 2006, Rogers is filing herewith through e-pass its responses to the interrogatories.
Document: 671778.zip - 889KB
2006-09-22 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Attached please find revised versions of TELUS Communications Company's interrogatory responses TELUS(CRTC)1Sept06-2 and TELUS(CRTC)1Sept06-5 in the proceeding initiated by PN 2006-12.
Document: 671743.zip - 55KB
2006-09-20 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in paragraph 19 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15 , and further to MTS Allstream Inc.'s (MTS Allstream) letter dated 15 September 2006, MTS Allstream submits responses to the following interrogatories:
Document: 668738.doc - 82KB
2006-09-19 - Access Communications Co-Operative Limited
Description: Please find attached the responses of Access Communications Co-operative Limited (Access Communications) to the Commission's interrogatories in the above-noted proceeding. We apologize for the late filing of these responses. The letter from Commission staff was inadvertently misplaced. Given the nature of the questions asked by the CRTC, we do not believe that any party to this proceeding will suffer prejudice as a result of this filing.
Document: 669264.zip - 68KB
2006-09-18 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream inadvertently disclosed confidential information in response to MTS Allstream (CRTC)18Aug06-103 PN2006-9 in its electronic filing on 15 September 2006. MTS Allstream requests that all parties destroy this version and replace it with the attached abridged version. MTS Allstream apologizes for any confusion or inconvenience this may have caused.
Document: 669237.zip - 59KB
2006-09-17 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada hereby files the abridged versions of its interrogatory reponses in this proceeding. The confidential versions were filed under separate cover on 15 September 2006.
Document: 666759.zip - 58KB
2006-09-15 - Bragg Communications Inc., cob as EastLink
Description: Please find attached the ABRIDGED interrogatory responses of Bragg Communications Inc., cob as EastLink, re the above-noted matter. A confidential version has been filed separately with the Commission.
Document: 666974.zip - 31KB
2006-09-15 - Vonage Canada Inc.
Description: Further to the letter of I September 2006 from Scott Hutton, Vonage Canada Inc. ("Vonage Canada") is pleased to provide the attached responses to interrogatories, requested by the Commission.
Document: 666958.pdf - 347KB
2006-09-15 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedure established by the Commission in the above-noted public notice, Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus) hereby files its responses to the Commission’s interrogatories. Primus is filing portions of its responses to the following interrogatories in confidence with the Commission:
Document: 666745.doc -74KB
2006-09-15 - FCI Broadband
Description: Attached please find FCI Broadband’s responses to interrogatories of the CRTC dated 1 September 2006.
Document: 666735.pdf - 232KB
2006-09-15 - Wightman Communications Ltd.
Description: Attached herein are Wightman Communications Limited responses to those interrogatories posed by the Commission on September 1, 2006.
Document: 666642.zip - 170KB
2006-09-15 - Mountain Cablevision Ltd.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, please find attached the responses of Mountain Cablevision to the Commission's interrogatories.
Document: 665887.zip - 21KB
2006-09-15 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the process established by the Commission in PN 2006-12, Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) is filing herewith through e-pass its response to interrogatory:
Document: 666445.zip - 389KB
2006-09-15 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: En accord avec la procédure établie par le Conseil dans l'Avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12, Télébec, Société en commandite dépose, en annexe, les réponses aux demandes de renseignements du 1er septembre 2006.
Document: 666408.zip -73KB
2006-09-15 - Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of itself and its subsidiary Videotron Ltd.
Description: QMI, on behalf of itself and its subsidiary Videotron Ltd., is pleased to provide the enclosed responses to interrogatories received in the proceeding initiated by PN 2006-12.
Document: 666332.zip - 65KB
2006-09-15 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedure established by the Commission in PN 2006-12, paragraph 19, please find attached the responses of Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) to the Commission’s Interrogatories.
Document: 666317.zip - 100KB
2006-09-15 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 19 of Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006 15 , Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 (PN 2006-12), SaskTel provides its responses to the Commission's interrogatories, issued 1 September 2006.
Document: 666273.zip - 69KB
2006-09-15 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in paragraph 19 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits responses to the following interrogatories.
Document: 666267.zip - 83KB
Description: Interrogatory Responses of Cybersurf Corp.
Document: 666255.zip - 56KB
2006-09-15 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Correction to Interrogatory Response Cybersurf(CRTC)31May06-2.
Document: 666800.doc - 1KB
2006-09-15 - Bell Canada
Description: • In accordance with paragraph 19 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 (PN 2006-12), Bell Canada (or the Company) submits the attached interrogatory responses to the parties in this proceeding.
Document: 666436.zip -14,775KB
2006-09-15 – MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-9, Proceeding to examine whether mobile wireless services should be considered to be in the same relevant market as wireline local exchange services with respect to forbearance, and related issues (PN 2006-9) and as amended by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the attached interrogatory responses
Document: 666341.zip (revised) – 1982KB
2006-09-15 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: These interrogatory responses are filed in response to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-9, titled Proceeding to examine whether mobile wireless services should be considered to be in the same relevant market as wireline local exchange services with respect to forbearance, and related issues on behalf of TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”.)
Document: 666364.pdf - 1447KB
2006-09-15 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebécor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 14 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-9, as amended by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, at paragraph 19, Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebécor Media Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Competitors) submit the attached responses to interrogatories issued by the Commission on August 18, 2006 to the cable companies.
Document: 666233.zip - 5646KB
2006-09-15 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-9 (PN 2006-9) and as amended by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12, Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15 , Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) submit the attached interrogatory responses to the parties in this proceeding.
Document: 666481.zip - 4632KB
Section 8a) Costs
2007-02-06 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for Consumers' Association of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization (the "Consumer Groups") is writing to amend the costs claim of the Consumer Groups, filed January 23, 2007 , in the above matter.
Document: 720267.pdf - 1553KB
2007-01-24 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of an application for costs in PN 2006-12 proceeding by l'Union des Consommateurs dated 13 November 2006, as well as Bell Canada's 15 January 2007 answer to that application.
Document: 714396.pdf - 24KB
2007-01-23 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: This is an application for costs and taxation thereof, made on behalf of the Consumers Group in respect of their participation in the above-noted proceedings.
Document: 714982.pdf (revised) - 840KB
2007-01-15 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of an application for costs in the above-noted proceeding from l'Union des consommateurs.
Document: 710971.doc - 278KB
2006-12-07 - Union des consommateurs
Description: La présente lettre vise à vous aviser que bien que la lettre accompagnant la demande d’adjudication des frais de l’Union des consommateurs pour sa participation à l’avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-12 date du 13 novembre 2006, la demande a été transmise à toutes les parties intéressées par courriel ainsi qu’au CRTC le 5 décembre 2006.
Document: 699749.doc - 71KB
2006-11-13 - Union des consommateurs
Description: Conformément à l'article 44 des Règles de proceédure du CRTC et à l'avis public 2006-12, l'Union des consommateurs demande l'adjudication de ses frais pour sa participation à l'avis public 2006-12.
Document: 698647.pdf - 188KB
Section 8b) Others
No documents
Date Modified: 2007-05-09
- Date modified: