2004-05-05 - #: 8638-C12-200405755 - Suivi de la Décision 2004-28 - Fourniture de services d'accès haute vitesse et Internet de détail incluant le service allégé

Dossier fermé - L ettre du Conseil - 2006-03-31

Référence seulement : 8740-S9-200600636

2006-12-21 - Décision de télécom CRTC 2006-77 Cogeco, Rogers, Shaw et Vidéotron - Tarifs du service d'accès Internet de tiers. Référence : 8740‑C6‑200606436, 8740‑R31‑200600280, 8740‑S9‑200600636, 8740‑V3‑200606444, 8638‑C12‑200405755.

2013-03-18 - Québecor Média Inc.
Description: Québecor Média inc., au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron, et conformément aux directives du Conseil au paragraphe 249 de la Décision de télécom CRTC 2006-77, soumet par
la présente une nouvelle page tarifaire 35 de son Tarif général CRTC 26950. La publication de cette page sert à assurer que les utilisateurs finaux des clients AITP de Vidéotron qui s’interconnectent au réseau de Vidéotron à un endroit autre que le point d’interconnexion centralisé de Vidéotron bénéficient des mêmes seuils de volume que les utilisateurs finaux de détail de Vidéotron. Nous soumettons également une nouvelle page de contrôle 2.
Document: 1883088.pdf - 141KO

2006-03-31 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Dossier #: 8740-S9-200600636 - 8638-C12-200405755
Description: Lettre adressée aux Parties intéressées à l'AP 98-14 - Objet: IMCAIP contre certaines entreprises titulaires de câblodistribution et de téléphone à l'égard de la fourniture anticoncurrentielle de service d'accès Internet haute vitesse de détail, incluant le service Lite - Décision de télécom 2004-28 du 5 mai 2005 et l'Avis de modification tarifaire 8 de Shaw Cablesystem G.P. (Shaw) - Processus

2004-12-03 - Xit Telecom inc.
Description: In this letter, Xit telecom is amending its letter dated August 20th 2004 requesting a procedural change to the proceeding initiated by paragraph 110 of Telecom Decision 2004-28 for the reasons stated in the attachment
Document: 041203.doc - 178KO

2004-10-20 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: This submission is made by MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) in response to the submission made by Cybersurf Corp. (Cybersurf) dated 20 September 2004
Document: 041020.doc - 431KO

2004-10-12 - Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Cybersurf is in receipt of a submission dated October 6, 2004 from the CCTA.
Document: 041012.pdf - 495KO

2004-10-06 - Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA)
Description: The CCTA is in receipt of comments filed by Cybersurf on 20 September 2004, Xit Télécom on 20 August 2004 and Primus Telecommunications Canada on 27 August 2004 regarding the submissions filed by the CCTA, Cogeco Cable Canada, Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications pursuant to directives in decision 2004-28
Document: 041006.pdf - 68KO

2004-09-20- Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Cybersurf Corp.
Description: This submission is made on behalf of Cybersurf, with respect to the directives issued by the Commision in paragraphs of Telecom Decision 2004-28 and submissions filed pursuant by various parties.
Document: 040920.pdf - 1213KO

2004-08-27 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus)
Descirption: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus) is in receipt of a copy of a letter from Xit Telecom Inc., dated 20 August 2004, requesting that the Commission permit interested parties to pose interrogatories, make deficiency and disclosure requests and final comments under a compressed time schedule.
Document: 040827.doc - 68KO

2004-08-20 - Xit Telecom
Description: In this letter, Xit telecom is requesting a procedural change to the follow-up process set by paragraph 110 of Telecom Decision 2004-28 for the reasons stated in the attachment
Document: 040820.doc - 109KO

2004-08-20 - Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Cybersurf Corp.
Description: This submission is made on behalf of Cybersurf Corp. (Cybersurf). Cybersurf is in receipt of various costing information and arguments filed by and on behalf of various carriers pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-28 as further amended.
Document: 040820.txt - 6KO

2004-08-19 - Quebecor Media on behalf of Vidéotron Ltée
Description: As directed by the Commission at paragraph 109 of Decision 2004-28, and as amended by the Commission’s procedural letter of June 15, 2004, Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI), on behalf of its subsidiary Vidéotron, is pleased to provide the enclosed updated economic evaluation for the access services which relate to the per end-user access rates for Vidéotron’s TPIA service
Document: 040819.zip - 48KO

2004-08-19 - Cogeco Cable Canada Inc.
Description: This filing is made by Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. (Cogeco) in response to the Commission's directives in Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-28 (Decision 2004-28), dated May 5, 2004 and the Commission's letter dated June 15, 2004
Document: 040819.zip - 86KO

2004-08-19 - Shaw Communications G.P.
Description: Shaw Cablesystems GP (Shaw) herein files its abridged version of the Economic Evaluation in Support of Third Party Internet Access Service Rates pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-28
Document: 040819.zip - 135KO

2004-08-19 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: In Decision 2004-28, at paragraph 94, the Commission directed incumbent carriers with tariffs for TPIA or ADSL to file cost studies based on the Commission's incremental Phase II costing approach, delineating the specific costs causal to Lite Access Service.
Document: 040819.zip - 131KO

2004-08-19 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: Pursuant to Decision 2004-28, CCTA is filing its views on the appropriate mark-up to be used in establishing the per end-user access rates for TPIA on behalf of Cogeco Cable Canada Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Cablesystems Inc.
Document: 040819.pdf - 404KO

2004-07-05 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: At paragraph 94 of Decision 2004-28, the Commission directed those incumbent carriers with tariffs for Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) or Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) to file, within 60 days of the decision, cost studies based on the Commission’s incremental Phase II costing approach, delineating the specific costs causal to Lite access service
Document: 040705.doc - 56KO

2004-07-02 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à Aliant Telecom Inc. - Objet: Décision de télécom CRTC 2004-28

2004-06-30 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-28 issued 5 May 2004, the Commission directed incumbent carriers of Lite access service using ADSL technology to file within 60 days, cost studies based on the Commission’s incremental Phase II costing approach, delineating the specific costs causal to Lite access service
Document: 040630.zip - 270KO - (révisé)

2004-06-24 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc. (Aliant or the Company) files this response pursuant to paragraph 94 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-28
Document: 040624.doc - 38KO

2004-06-15 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée aux Parties intéressées - Objet: Décision de télécom CRTC 2004-28 - Les MIACFI contre certaines enterprises titulaires de câblodistribution et de téléphone - Fourniture de services d'accès autre vitesse et internet de détail incluant le service allégé

2004-06-07 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: The CCTA is in receipt of the IMCAIP letter dated 4 June 2004.
Document: 040607.pdf - 88KO

2004-06-04 - Independent Members of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (IMCAIP)
Description: The IMCAIP are in receipt of a letter, dated May 26, 2004 from the CCTA seeking a 60 day extension to the filing deadlines prescribed in the follow-up process to Decision 2004-28 set out in that Decision.
Document: 040604.pdf - 131KO

2004-05-26 - Quebecor Média et Vidéotron Ltée
Description: La présente a pour objet d’appuyer la lettre déposée par Monsieur Michael Hennessy de l’ACTC en date du 26 mai 2004
Document: 040526.doc - 294KO

2004-05-26 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: The CCTA is filing this request for a change in the procedures set out in Telecom Decision 2004-28 issued 5 May 2004.
Document: 040526.pdf - 57KO

Mise à jour : 2013-04-05

Date de modification :

2006-12-21