2002/11/12 - #: 8622-C51-03/02 - CAIP - Contre certaines entreprises titulaires de câblodistribution et de téléphone à l'égard de la fourniture anticoncurrentielle de service d'accès Internet haute vitesse de détail, incluant le service Lite
2004/05/05 - Décision de télécom CRTC 2004-28 Les MIACFI contre certaines entreprises titulaires de câblodistribution et de téléphone - Fourniture de services d'accès haute vitesse et Internet de détail incluant le service allégé. Dans la décision Demande des MIACFI visant la revente obligatoire du service Internet allégé de détail, Décision de télécom CRTC 2003-47, 14 juillet 2003, le Conseil a examiné une partie du redressement réclamé dans la demande datée du 12 novembre 2002 des membres indépendants de l'Association canadienne des fournisseurs Internet (MIACFI). Le reste du redressement réclamé par les MIACFI est traité dans la présente décision. Référence : 8622-C51-03/02. [.pdf]
2003/07/14 - Décision de télécom CRTC 2003-47-1 Le Conseil apporte des corrections à la dernière phrase du paragraphe 7 de la version française de la décision Demande des MIACFI visant la revente obligatoire du service Internet allégé de détail, Décision de télécom CRTC 2003-47, 14 juillet 2003. Référence :8622-C51-03/02.
2003/07/14 - Décision de télécom CRTC 2003-47 Le Conseil établit que la condition de revente obligatoire prévue dans la décision Demande concernant l'accès des fournisseurs de services Internet aux installations de télécommunications d'entreprises de câblodistribution titulaires, Décision Télécom CRTC 99-11, 14 septembre 1999 (la décision 99-11) s'applique au service Internet (SI) allégé. Par conséquent, le rabais de 25 % obligatoire établi dans la Décision 99-11 s'applique au SI allégé de détail, à compter de la date de la présente décision, et ce, jusqu'à ce que l'accès aux installations de télécommunication sous jacentes servant à la fourniture du SI allégé de détail soit offert aux termes de tarifs approuvés.
Référence : 8622-C51-03/02.
2004-06-07 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: The CCTA is in receipt of the IMCAIP letter dated 4 June 2004.
Document: 040607.pdf - 88KO
2004-06-04 - Independent Members of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (IMCAIP)
Description: The IMCAIP are in receipt of a letter, dated May 26, 2004 from the CCTA seeking a 60 day extension to the filing deadlines prescribed in the follow-up process to Decision 2004-28 set out in that Decision.
Document: 040604.pdf - 131KO
2004-05-26 - Quebecor Média et Vidéotron Ltée
Description: La présente a pour objet d'appuyer la lettre déposée par Monsieur Michael Hennessy de l'ACTC en date du 26 mai 2004
Document: 040526.doc - 294KO
2004-05-26 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: The CCTA is filing this request for a change in the procedures set out in Telecom Decision 2004-28 issued 5 May 2004.
Document: 040526.pdf - 57KO
2003/03/18 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc. and Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc. and Saskatchewan Telecommunications, (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of a letter dated 11 March 2003 from the Independent Members of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (IMCAIP). While the Companies do not wish to further discuss the substantive issues in dispute in the above referenced proceeding, the Companies do wish to address certain procedural matters raised by IMCAIP.
Document: 030318.zip - 114KO
2003/03/11 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: The Independent Members of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers ("IMCAIP") are in receipt of a letter from the Companies in which the Companies have provided comment on both a February 28 letter from CCTA and IMCAIP's March 5 reply.
Document: 030311.pdf - 134KO
2003/03/07 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc. and Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc. and Saskatchewan Telecommunications, (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of the 10 February reply comments of IMCAIP, the 28 February letter of the Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA) and IMCAIP's 5 March reply. The Companies wish to add the following submissions.
Document: 030307_1.doc - 149KO
2003/03/05 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: IMCAIP are in receipt of a letter to the Commission From the CCTA dated February 28, 2003, objecting to certain evidence filed by IMCAIP in its February 10, 2003.
Document: 030305.pdf - 498KO
2003/02/28 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: The CCTA is in receipt of Reply Comments from the Independent Members of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (IMCAIP) dated February 10, 2003, in respect of this application
Document: 030228.pdf - 768KO
2003/02/27 - François D. Ménard
Description: The following comments are filed by Francois D. Ménard in respect of the follow-up proceedings.
Document: 030227.doc - 66KO
2003/02/26 - Valerie Lai
Description: I would like to add some comments on the existing highspeed internet market, in support to CAIP 's complaint against certain incumbent cable and Telephone carriers for Anti-competition act.
Document: 030226.htm - 3KO
2003/02/10 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: The Independent Members of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers ("IMCAIP") hereby file the enclosed Reply Comments in respect of the application against certain Incumbent Cable and Telephone Carriers in respect of their anti-competitive provision of high-speed access services and high-speed retail Internet services, including so-called Lite IS ("Application").
Document: 030210.zip - 117KO
2003/01/26 - ABC Communications
Description: I would like to add the following information to assist the commission in reaching its decision regarding the request from our Industry association on behalf of its members for relief from certain practices employed by the incumbent cable and telephone companies in Canada
Document: 030126.doc - 40KO
2003/01/24 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: Please find attached a letter regarding procedural matters relating to the above-mentioned application by IMCAIP.
Document: 030124.doc - 88KO
2003/01/20 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc. and Saskatchewan Telecommunications, (collectively, the Companies)
Description: Further to the directions on procedure issued by the Commission on 6 December 2002, please find attached the Answer of Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc. and Saskatchewan Telecommunications, (collectively, the Companies) to the above-mentioned application by IMCAIP.
Document: 030120.zip - 1655KO
2003/01/20 - François D. Ménard
Description: The following constitutes a request for change in default procedures to allow the addition of interrogatories, comments and reply comments by other interested parties, along with preliminary comments of Francois D. Menard.
Document: 030120.doc - 71KO
2003/01/20 - Shaw Cablesystems
Description: Shaw Cablesystems GP submits the following comments in relation to affidavits filed by Cybersurf Corporation in support of an application before the Commission by the Independent Members of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers.
Document: 030120.zip - 226KO
2003/01/20 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: Enclosed please find the submission of TELUS Communications Inc. ("TELUS") in response to the above-mentioned application by IMCAIP.
Document: 030120.doc - 5034KO
2003/01/20 - Quebecor Média au nom de Vidéotron
Description: This reply is submitted by Vidéotron in response to a Part VII Application filed by the Independent Members of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (IMCAIP), dated November 12, 2003.
Document: 030120.doc - 67KO
2003/01/20 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: The Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA) is in receipt of an application by the Independent Members of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (IMCAIP), requesting that the Commission issue a number of orders against cable distributors and telephone companies providing high-speed Internet services.
Document: 030120.zip - 181KO
2002/12/13 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: By letter, dated December 6, 2002, from Mr. Paul Godin, Director of Competition and Technology, Commission Telecom Branch, regarding the above-captioned proceeding ("Commission Letter"), the Commission directed IMCAIP to file on the public record with the Commission and serve on interested parties certain information described in the Commission Letter which form part of the above-referenced IMCAIP application ("Application").
Document: 021213.zip - 307KO
2002/12/06 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée aux Parties Intéressées - Objet: Demande présentée par Les Membres Indépendants de l'Association canadiennes des fournisseurs internet contre certaines entreprises titulaires de câblodistribution et de téléphone à l'égard de la fourniture anticoncurrentielle de service d'accès Internet haute vitesse de détail, Service allége "Lite Service" inclus
2002/11/25 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: The Independent Members of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers ("IMCAIP") are in receipt of the following letters in respect of the above-captioned IMCAIP application ("Application").
Document: 021125.doc - 117KO
2002/11/20 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS has reviewed the IMCAIP Application and supporting affidavits and has been similarly troubled that the applicant's claims of confidentiality largely obscure the evidence provided to support the remedies requested.
Document: 021120.doc - 50KO
2002/11/19 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc. and Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc. and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of an Application dated 12 November 2002 by the Independent Members of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (IMCAIP) against certain incumbent cable carriers and the Companies alleging anti competitive provision of high speed access and retail Internet services. For the reasons outlined below, the Companies submit that the Application is incomplete and that they should not be required to espond to it unless and until they have been served with a complete Application.
Document: 021119.doc - 140KO
2002/11/18 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: The Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA), on behalf of its member companies, hereby requests the Commission to direct IMCAIP to disclose the information filed subject to the claim of confidentiality.
Document: 021118.doc - 202KO
2002/11/12 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: Pursuant to the Telecommunications Act, Part VII of the Telecommunications Rules of Procedure ("Rules") and section 9 of the Broadcasting Distribution Regulations the Independent Members of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers ("IMCAIP") hereby file an application against certain Incumbent Cable and Telephone Carriers in respect of their anti-competitive provision of high-speed access services and high-speed retail Internet services, including so-called Lite IS ("Application").
Document: 021112.zip - 186KO
Mise à jour : 2004-06-09
- Date de modification :