2001-05-28 - #: 8690-A4-01/01 - AT&T Canada Corp. - Demande visant la négociation de conditions d'accès aux servitudes municipales avec la corporation de la ville de Toronto
2004-12-06 - Décision de télécom CRTC 2004-79 Le Conseil rejette une demande visant à permettre à la Fédération canadienne des municipalités ainsi qu'aux villes d'Edmonton et de Vancouver d'intervenir dans les deux demandes en vertu de la partie VII que MTS Allstream a déposées contre les villes de Toronto et de Calgary. Le Conseil rejette également la demande des villes de Toronto et de Calgary et qui vise l'établissement d'un autre processus pouvant inclure une audience avec comparution, afin de soumettre des mémoires concernant les demandes de MTS Allstream. Référence : 8690-A4-01/01 et 8690-A4-04/02.
2003-12-04 - Décision de télécom CRTC 2003-82 Le Conseil estime qu'aucune disposition de la Loi sur les télécommunications, y compris l'article 43, ne prévoit la possibilité pour le Conseil d'émettre une directive générale obligeant les parties à rendre conformes tous les accords d'accessibilité municipale (AAM) en vigueur au moyen d'une série de lignes directrices semblables à celles énoncées dans la décision CRTC 2001-23. Le Conseil est disposé à examiner les demandes d'entreprises canadiennes désirant établir que la municipalité ne leur a pas donné son agrément suivant des conditions qui leur sont acceptables, car il incombe aux entreprises canadiennes qui déposent une demande auprès du Conseil d'établir que les AAM signés ne représentent pas une preuve qu'elles ont obtenu, suivant des conditions qui leur sont acceptables, l'agrément de la municipalité pour construire une ligne de transmission. Référence : 8690-C12-03/01, 8690-A4-01/01 et 8690-A4-04/02
2001-08-31 - Avis Public de télécom CRTC 2001-99 - Modalités et conditions des ententes actuelles régissant l'accès aux propriétés municipales. - Référence: 9690-A4-01/01 - 8690-C12-03/01
Pour référence seulement : 8690-C12-03/01 - 8690-A4-04/02
2005-03-15 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Description: Lettre adressée à la ville de Toronto et MTS Allstream Inc. - Objet : Décision de télécom CRTC 2004-79 - Demande pour modifier les modalités et les conditions des accords d'accès municipal en vigueur conclus avec la ville de Toronto
2005-02-28 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (together with its predecessor corporations, hereinafter referred to as MTS Allstream) has received the City of Toronto's (Toronto) letter of 23 February 2005 in response to MTS Allstream's reply of 14 February 2005 (the Reply).
Document: 050228.doc - 469KO
2005-02-23 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto (“Toronto”) has now received and had an opportunity to review the Reply dated February 14, 2005 (the “Reply”) of MTS Allstream Inc. (“Allstream”) to the City of Toronto’s Answer filed February 4, 2005.
Document: 050223.zip - 312KO
2005-02-14 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. hereby submits its Reply comments to the City of Toronto pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-79, Process for MTS Allstream's applications to vary the terms and conditions of existing municipal agreements with the cities of Toronto and Calgary, 6 December 2004.
Document: 050214.zip - 2246KO
2005-02-04 - City of Toronto
Description: Answer of the City of Toronto to the comments of MTS Allstream Inc. pursuant to telecom decision CRTC 2004-79 (to vary the terms of existing agreements)
Document: 050204.zip - 2361KO
2005-01-27 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Description: Lettre adressée à City of Toronto - Objet : Décision de télécom CRTC 2004-79 - Demande de divulgation - Observations de MTS Allstream du 5 janvier 2005
2005-01-25 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto (“Toronto”) is in receipt of the written comments (dated 5 January, 2005) submitted by MTS Allstream Inc. (“Allstream”) pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-79
Document: 050125.doc - 60KO
2005-01-05 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 36 of the above-noted decision MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream, together with its predecessor corporations, are hereinafter referred to as MTS Allstream) submits the following comments regarding how Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-82, Terms and conditions of existing agreements for access to municipal rights-of-way , 4 December 2003, should be applied in the context of MTS Allstream's dispute with the City of Toronto.
Document: 050105.zip- 3488KO
2004-11-29 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: We are writing concerning the status of this Part VII application, filed by AT&T Canada Corp. (now MTS Allstream Inc.) on 28 May 2001.
Document: 041129.pdf - 107KO
2004-06-14 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto (Toronto) is in receipt of the written comments (dated May 26, 2004) submitted by Allstream and Telus (the Carriers) in response to the Commission’s direction of April 26, 2004, and submits the following reply comments
Document: 040614.doc - 78KO
2004-06-14 - City of Calgary
Description: The City of Calgary (Calgary) has reviewed the comments of Allstream Corp (Allstream) and TELUS Corporation (TELUS) both dated 2004 May 26, as well as those of the Regional Municipality of Halifax (Halifax) of the same date
Document: 040614.doc - 39KO
2004-05-26 - Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM)
Description: These comments are made in response to the Commission's invitation dated 26 April 2004 in respect of certain requests made by Toronto, Calgary, FCM el al.
Document: 040526.wpd - 56KO
2004-05-26 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Allstream hereby responds to the Commission's April 26, 2004 request for comments on the procedure proposed by the City of Toronto in its letter of April 20, 2004 as well as the comments by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the cities of Edmonton and Vancouver (FCM et al) submitted April 20, 2004 and the City of Calgary submitted on April 21, 2004
Document: 040526.doc - 268KO
2004-05-26 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: Further to the letter of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (the Commission) dated 26 April 2004, parties were invited to comment on the requests made by Toronto, FCM et. al. and Calgary that...
Document: 040526.doc - 53KO
2004-04-26 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Description: Lettre adressée aux Parties intéressées à l'AP 2001-99 - Objet: Requête pour obtenir des directives - Observations sur la procédure proposée afin de considérer la Partie VII présentée par Allstream sous Modalités et conditions des accords en vigueur régissant l'accès aux servitudes municipales, Décision de télécom CRTC 2003-82, 4 décembre 2003
2004-04-21 - City of Calgary
Description: The City of Calgary is aware of correspondence dated 2004 March 11 from Allstream Corp. to the Interested Parties indicating that Allstream proposes to file the submissions contemplated by Decision 2003-82 by 2004 April 12
Document: 040421.doc - 28KO
2004-04-20 - Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), City of Edmonton and City of Vancouver
Description: This submission is being filed on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), City of Edmonton (Edmonton), and City of Vancouver (Vancouver) (collectively the Municipal Interveners).
Document: 040420.doc - 67KO
2004-04-20 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto is in receipt of correspondence (March 11, 2004) from Allstream Corp. wherein Allstream proposed to file the submissions contemplated by Decision 2003-82 within 30 days of the date of that letter, i.e., by 12 April 2004
Document: 040420.doc - 60KO
2004-03-12 - Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipalities et al
Description: This submission is being filed on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipalities, City of Edmonton, City of Calgary, City of Toronto and City of Vancouver (the Municipal Parties).
Document: 040312.doc - 62KO
2004-01-08 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Description: Lettre adressée à City of Toronto - Objet: Suivi de la Décision de télécom CRTC 2003-82 - Suite à la lettre du 5 janvier 2004 de City of Toronto
2004-01-05 - City of Toronto
Description: Further to my letter of December 30, 2003, please be advised that I have now determined that a copy of Allstream's December 17, 2003 request was e-mailed to my office on that date
Document: 040105.doc - 51KO
2003-12-30 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Description: Lettre adressée à Allstream Inc. - Objet: Modalités et conditions des accords en vigueur régissant l'accès aux servitudes municipales - Décision de télécom CRTC 2003-82 - 4 décembre 2003
2003-12-30 - City of Toronto
Description: I am in receipt of your letter of December 30, 2003. The City of Toronto objects to the issuance of an ex parte decision by the Commission in these circumstances and asks that the Commission consider the following...
Document: 031230.zip - 114KO
2001-07-25 - AT&T Canada Corp.
Description: This letter is filed on behalf of AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company and AT&T Canada Corp. (collectively, AT&T Canada). AT&T Canada is in receipt of a letter dated 11 July 2001 (the Letter) filed with the Commission by the City of Toronto (the City).
Document: 010725.doc - 42KO
2001-07-23 - City of Toronto
Description: I am writing to advise the Commission of the release on July 18, 2001 of the reasons (July 13, 2001) of the Federal Court of Appeal in the appeal of CRTC Telecom Decision No. 99-13. The unreported text of the decision is enclosed with this letter in soft copy.
Document: 010723. doc - 46KO
2001-07-20 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto (the "City") has now, pursuant to the Commission's letter of July 10, 2001, received comments from AT&T Canada ("AT&T"), Vidéotron Télécom ltée ("VTL") and Bell Canada ("Bell") respecting the issue of whether unsolicited comments previously received from non-parties to this proceeding should become part of the record of this proceeding.
Document: 010720.doc - 58KO
2001-07-18 - Bell Canada
Description: Bell Canada (the Company) is in receipt of a letter from the Commission, dated and received 10 July 2001, in which the Commission has issued directives on procedure regarding the above referenced Part VII application (the AT&T Application) from AT&T Canada Corp. (AT&T).
Document: 010718.doc - 42KO
2001-07-18 - AT&T Canada Corp.
Description: These comments are filed on behalf of AT&T Canada Corp. and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company (collectively, AT&T Canada) pursuant to the direction set out by the Commission in its letter dated 10 July 2001.
Document: 010718.doc - 38KO
2001-07-18 - Vidéotron Télécom ltée
Description: Vidéotron Télécom Ltée ("VTL") is in receipt of the Commission's letter, dated July 10, 2001, in which AT&T Canada, Canadian Cable Television Association ("CCTA"), Telus Corporation ("Telus"), Bell Canada ("Bell"), GroupTelecom ("GT") and VTL are invited to file comments with the Commission, copying the City of Toronto, as to whether the correspondence filed with the Commission by these parties in the above matter should form part of the record of this proceeding.
Document: 010718.doc - 39KO
2001-07-11 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto has now received and had an opportunity to review the Reply dated July 9, 2001 (the "Reply") of AT&T Canada ("AT&T") to the City of Toronto's Answer (filed June 28, 2001). Unfortunately, a review of the Reply shows that AT&T has chosen to introduce a number of new issues and evidence before the Commission which either should not be considered or should have properly been contained in its initial Application.
Document: 010711.doc - 53KO
2001-07-10 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Description: Lettre adressée à Liste de Distribution - Objet: AT&T v. City of Toronto - Application partie VII
2001-07-10 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto has received the Commission's letter (dated July 10, 2001) providing some procedural direction with respect to the unsolicited comments received by CCTA, Telus, Bell Canada, Group Telecom and Vidéotron.
Document: 010710_1.doc - 43KO
2001-07-10 - City of Toronto
Description: Answer of the City of Toronto to the Application of At&T Canada for Access to Municipal Rights of Way Within the Corporation of the City of Toronto.
Document: 010710.doc - 194KO
2001-07-09 - AT&T Canada Corp.
Description: Pursuant to section 61 of Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, AT&T Canada Corp. on behalf of itself and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company (AT&T Canada) hereby files the attached reply to the City of Toronto's response to the above-noted application.
Document: 010709.doc - 66KO
2001-06-29 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto has now received letters from Telus Communications Inc., GT Group Telecom Services Corp. and Bell Canada providing comments on the Part VII Application by AT&T.
Document: 010629.doc - 45KO
2001-06-29 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto has now received a further letter from Vidéotron Télécom ltée which is virtually identical in content to those submitted by the parties mentioned in my earlier letter today. It would appear that a mailing campaign is now underway. For the reasons as set in my earlier letter, the City again objects to any consideration by the Commission of these unsolicited comments from parties who have no involvement in the private contractual dispute before the Commission.
Document: 010629_1.doc - 42KO
2001-06-29 - Vidéotron Télécom Ltée
Description: On May 28, 2001, AT&T Canada filed a Part VII application by which it is seeking a Commission order setting out terms and conditions under which the City of Toronto would provide access to public highways and municipal property located on the territory of the City of Toronto for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and operating a fibre optic telecommunications network.
Document: 010629.doc - 34KO
2001-06-28 - Bell Canada
Description: Bell Canada is in receipt of an application submitted by AT&T Canada Corp. (AT&T) dated 28 May 2001 seeking a Commission order which would substitute terms and conditions in the current access agreement between AT&T and the City of Toronto with terms and conditions that are consistent with those set out in Decision 2001-23 - Ledcor/Vancouver - Construction, operation and maintenance of transmission lines in Vancouver.
Document: 010628_1.doc - 55KO
2001-06-28 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS recommends that the Commission resolve the dispute between AT&T and the City in line with the principles established in Decision 2001-23.
Document: 010628.doc - 47KO
2001-06-28 - GT Group Telecom Services Corp.
Decription: GT Group Telecom Services Corp. (Group Telecom) is in receipt of an application dated 28 May, 2001, by AT&T Canada Corp. on behalf of itself and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company (AT&T Canada) filed pursuant to subsections 32(d) and (e) and 43(4) of the Telecommunications Act.
Document: 010628.doc - 52KO
2001-06-27 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: The CCTA supports the application by AT&T Canada. In CCTA's submission, the principles, terms and conditions for access to municipal rights of way established in Decision 2001-23 are important to furthering the Commission's objective of fostering a competitive telecommunications market.
Document: 010627.doc - 84KO
2001-05-28 - AT&T Canada Corp.
Description: Pursuant to Part VII of the Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, AT&T Canada Corp. on behalf of itself and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company ("AT&T Canada") hereby files the attached Part VII Application. AT&T Canada is seeking a Commission order which substitutes those terms and conditions contained in the Licence of the Use of City Rights of Way Agreement ("the Licence Agreement") between AT&T Canada and the Corporation of the City of Toronto ("the City") which are incompatible with the terms approved in Decision CRTC 2001-23.
Document: 010528.zip - 37KO
- Date de modification :