2001/08/31 - #: 8690-C12-03/01 - Avis public 2001-99 - Modalités etconditions des ententes actuelles régissant l'accès aux propriétésmunicipales
Référence: 8690-A4-01/01
Section 1 - Documents du Conseil
a) Avis public, décisions, etc.
b) Liste des parties intéressées
c) Correspondance aux parties
d) Demandes de renseignements
Section 2 - Documents de AT&T Canada et de la Ville de Toronto
a) Correspondance au Conseil
b) Demande de AT&T Canada
c) Mémoire
d) Demandes de renseignements
e) Demandes de réponses complémentaires et demandes de divulgation
f) Répliques aux demandes de réponses complémentaires et aux demandes de divulgation
g) Observations
h) Répliques aux observations
i) Autres
Section 4 - Documents des parties
a) Avis de participation
b) Correspondance au Conseil
c) Mémoire
d) Demandes de renseignements
e) Demandes de réponses complémentaires et demandes de divulgation
f) Répliques aux demandes de réponses complémentaires et aux demandes de divulgation
g) Observations
h) Répliques aux observations
i) Autres
Section 5 - Réponses aux demandes de renseignements
Section 8 - Documents divers
Section 1a) Avis public, décisions, etc
2003/12/04 - Décision de télécom CRTC 2003-82 Le Conseil estime qu'aucune disposition de la Loi sur les télécommunications, y compris l'article 43, ne prévoit la possibilité pour le Conseil d'émettre une directive générale obligeant les parties à rendre conformes tous les accords d'accessibilité municipale (AAM) en vigueur au moyen d'une série de lignes directrices semblables à celles énoncées dans la décision CRTC 2001-23. Le Conseil est disposé à examiner les demandes d'entreprises canadiennes désirant établir que la municipalité ne leur a pas donné son agrément suivant des conditions qui leur sont acceptables, car il incombe aux entreprises canadiennes qui déposent une demande auprès du Conseil d'établir que les AAM signés ne représentent pas une preuve qu'elles ont obtenu, suivant des conditions qui leur sont acceptables, l'agrément de la municipalité pour construire une ligne de transmission. Référence : 8690-C12-03/01, 8690-A4-01/01 et 8690-A4-04/02
2001/12/13 - Décision de télécom CRTC 2001-753 - Demande de la ville de Toronto visant à modifier l'avis public CRTC 2001-99. Référence : 8690-C12-03/01.
2001/08/31 - Avis public de télécom CRTC 2001-99 - Modalités et conditions des ententes actuelles régissant l'accès aux propriétés municipales
Section 1c) Correspondance aux parties
2001/11/05 - Lettre du Conseil - Version française seulement - "Version imprimée"
Lettre adressée aux Parties intéressées Avis public 2001-99 - Cette lettre modifie la procedure dans le processus susmentionné
2001/10/12 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement- "Version imprimée"
Lettre adressée aux Parties intéressées Avis public 2001-99 - Cette lettre modifie la procedure dans le processus susmentionné
2001/10/11 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement- "Version imprimée"
Lettre adressée à la Ville de Toronto - Réponses à la letter du 9 Octobre 2001 de la Ville de Toronto
Section 1d) Demandes de renseignements
Aucun documents
Section 2a) Correspondance au Conseil
2001/10/10 - City of Toronto
Further to our recent discussions, I am writing to outline the City of Toronto's objections with respect to the wording and initial determination of the record for Public Notice CRTC 2001-99.
Document:011010.doc - 45KO
Section 2b) Demande de AT&T Canada
2001/05/28 - AT&T Canada Corp.
Pursuant to Part VII of the Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, AT&T Canada Corp. on behalf of itself and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company ("AT&T Canada") hereby files the attached Part VII Application. AT&T Canada is seeking a Commission order which substitutes those terms and conditions contained in the Licence of the Use of City Rights of Way Agreement ("the Licence Agreement") between AT&T Canada and the Corporation of the City of Toronto ("the City") which are incompatible with the terms approved in Decision CRTC 2001-23.
Document: 010528.zip - 37KO
Section 2c) Mémoire
Aucun documents
Section 2d) Demandes de renseignements
Aucun documents
Section 2e) Demandes de réponses complémentaires et demandes de divulgation
Aucun documents
Section 2f) Répliques aux demandes de réponses complémentaires et demandes de divulgation
Aucun documents
Section 2g) Observations
2002/01/18 - AT&T Canada
Pursuant to the procedures established in the above noted public notice, as amended by the Commission's Decision 2001-753, AT&T Canada Corp. on behalf of itself and AT&T Canada Telecom Services (collectively, AT&T Canada) submits the following comments.
Document: 020118.doc - 78KO
2002/01/18 - City of Toronto
Enclosed, please find the Comments of the City of Toronto, with attachments, which are filed in accordance with the Commission's direction in its Letter Decision CRTC 2001-753.
Document: 020118.zip - 805KO
2001/10/29 - AT&T Canada
AT&T Canada Corp. and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company (collectively, AT&T Canada) are filing the following comments regarding the request made in a letter dated 9 October 2001 by the City of Toronto (Toronto) to amend Public Notice CRTC 2001-99 (PN 2001-99).
Document: 011029.doc - 117KO
Section 2h) Répliques aux observations
2002/03/06 - AT&T Canada
Description: AT&T Canada Corp. on behalf of itself and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company (collectively, AT&T Canada) submits a revision to page 12 of its 15 February 2002 reply comments.
Document: 020306.doc - 33KO
2002/02/15 - City of Toronto
Attached, please find the City of Toronto's Reply Comments, which are being served in accordance with the Commission's instructions in its Letter Decision CRTC 2001-753 (13 December, 2001). Please feel free to contact me should you have any difficulty viewing the contents.
Document: 020215.zip - 43KO
2002/02/15 - AT&T Canada
Pursuant to the procedures established in the above noted public notice, as amended by the Commission's Decision 2001-753, AT&T Canada Corp. on behalf of itself and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company (collectively, AT&T Canada) submits the following reply comments.
Document: 020215.doc - 74KO
Section 2i) Autres
Aucun documents
Section 4b) Correspondance au Conseil
2001/10/12 - City of White Rock in British Columbia
Inform CRTC that they will submit a submission.
Document: 011012.htm - 2KO
Section 4c) Mémoire
Aucun documents
Section 4d) Demandes de renseignements
Aucun documents
Section 4e) Demandes de réponses complémentaires et demandes de divulgation
Aucun documents
Section 4f) Répliques aux demandes de réponses complémentaires et demandes de divulgation
Aucun documents
Section 4g) Observations
2002/01/18 - Halifax Regional Municipality
Please find attached the Halifax Regional Municipality's comments in the above-noted matter.
Document: 020118.wpd - 20KO
2002/01/18 - City of Vancouver
These comments of the City of Vancouver (Vancouver) are in response to Public Notice CRTC 2001-99.
Document: 020118.wpd - 25KO
2002/01/18 - The Federation of Canadian Municipalities
These Comments are being filed on behalf of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities ("FCM") pursuant to paragraph 8 of Terms and conditions of existing agreements for access to municipal property, Public Notice CRTC 2001-99.
Document: 020118.doc - 73KO
2002/01/18 - Bell Canada
Further to the directives on procedure contained in Decision 2001-753, issued 13 December 2001, Bell Canada submits the following comments.
Document: 020118.doc - 64KO
2002/01/18 - Vidéotron Télécom ltée
Pursuant to the procedure established in Public Notice CRTC 2001-99 ("PN 2001-99"), Terms and conditions of existing agreements for access to municipal property, paragraph 8, revised by the Commission in Decision CRTC 2001-753, City of Toronto request to amend Public Notice CRTC 2001-99, Vidéotron Télécom ltée ("VTL") submits the following comments.
Document: 020118.doc - 47KO
2002/01/18 - The City of Edmonton
These comments of The City of Edmonton ("Edmonton") are filed pursuant to Public Notice CRTC 2001-99.
Document: 020118.doc - 30KO
2002/01/18 - TELUS Communications Inc.
The following comments are submitted on behalf of TELUS Communications Inc. ("TELUS" or the "Company") pursuant to the directions on procedure in Public Notice 2001-99.
Document: 020118.doc - 86KO
2002/01/18 - GT Group Telecom Services Corp.
The attached comments are being submitted to the Commission by GT Group Telecom Services Corp. on behalf of itself and Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Document: 020118.zip - 57KO
2002/01/18 - The Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
The Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA) is pleased to provide its comments with respect to the above-noted proceeding in accordance with the procedure established in Public Notice CRTC 2001-99 (PN 2001-99), as modified by Decision CRTC 2001-753.
Document: 020118.doc - 114KO
2002/01/18 - The Corporation of the City of Burlington
These comments are being filed on behalf of the Corporation of the City of Burlington, duly registered as an interested party to this proceeding.
Document: 020118.zip - 9KO
2002/01/18 - City of Calgary
These comments of The City of Calgary ("the City") are filed pursuant to Public Notice CRTC 2001-99.
Document: 020118.doc - 53KO
2002/01/18 - City of Ottawa
Attached is the City of Ottawa's submission in the above matter.
Document: 020118.zip - 307KO
2002/01/18 - Town of Qualicum Beach
This correspondence is in response to the Commission's letter to Interested Parties dated October 12th, 2001, soliciting comments on the City of Toronto's October 9, 2001, request for clarification and amendment to Public Notice 2001-99.
Document: 020118.doc - 21KO
2002/01/18 - Municipal District of East Peace No. 131
In regard to the Public Notice noted above, the Municipal District of East Peace No. 131 agrees with the FCM and Toronto position that the CRTC has no jurisdiction to modify existing rights-of-way agreements between municipalities and carriers.
Document: 020118.doc - 89KO
2001/11/09 - Municipal Council of the Town of Fort Erie
Please be advised that the Municipal Council of the Town of Fort Erie at its meeting held October 9th, 2001 passed the following resolution that is self explanatory.
Document: 011109.doc - 22KO
2001/11/01 - GT Group Telecom Services Corp.
GT Group Telecom Services Corp. on behalf of itself and Call-Net Enterprises Inc. files the attached comments in response to a letter submitted by the City of Toronto dated October 15, 2001.
Document: 011101.doc - 56KO
2001/10/29 - Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM)
This submission is made on behalf of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities ("FCM") in response to the Commission's letter dated 11 October 2001 ("the Procedural Letter") in the above-cited proceeding.
Document: 011029.doc - 105KO
2001/10/29 - Bell Canada
Proceeding issued by the Commission on 11 October 2001. Bell Canada submits comments with respect to a request made by the City of Toronto (the City) in a letter to the Commission, dated 9 October 2001.
Document: 011029.doc - 62KO
2001/10/29 - Futureway Communications Inc.
Pursuant to the procedures established in PN 2001-99, Futureway hereby submits its comments.
Document: 011029.doc - 310KO
2001/10/29 - City of Vancouver
These comments are made in response to the Commission's letter dated October 11, 2001. That letter was prompted by the request made by the City of Toronto ("Toronto") in a letter to the Commission dated October 9, 2001.
Document: 011029.wpd - 109KO
2001/10/29 - TELUS Communications Inc.
TELUS hereby submits the following comments in response to the City's request
Document: 011029.doc - 140KO
2001/10/29 - City of Edmonton
Attached please find the City of Edmonton's response to the CRTC's request for comments on the City of Toronto's request for clarification and amendment to Public Notice 2001-99.
Document: 011029.doc - 41KO
2001/10/29 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
On October 18, 2001, the Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA) received a letter from the City of Toronto (the City), dated October 9, 2001, seeking to amend the Public Notice in the above-noted proceeding. On the same date, CCTA received a copy of a letter from the Commission, dated October 11, 2001, providing interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the City's request.
Document: 011029.doc - 49KO
2001/10/23 - Office of The Mayor - City of Prince George - "Version imprimée"
With reference to Public Notice CRTC 2001-99 - Terms and conditions of existing agreements for access to municipal property, where the Commission initiates a proceeding to consider the circumstances, if any, where the Commission could alter the terms and conditions of an existing property-access contract between a carrier and a municipality.
"Liste des commentaires par order alphabétique"
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
C
Cullen, Brian - Municipality of Digby
K
Kinsley, Colin - City of Prince George
O
Oneil, Dan - City of Airdrie
W
Weir, R.K. - Town of Qualicum Beach
"Observations reçues en version imprimée seulement"
2001/11/21 - Association of Municipalities of Ontario
2001/11/15 - City of Mississauga
2001/11/06 - City of Kitchener
2001/10/29 - City of Prince Albert
2001/10/16 - District of Maple Ridge
2001/10/25 - Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO)
2001/10/23 - Strathcona County
2001/10/12 - Municipality of Digby
Section 4h) Répliques aux observations
2002/02/15 - City of Ottawa
The City of Ottawa ("Ottawa") submits its Reply Comments in response to issues raised in the Comments submitted by parties adverse in interest received by Ottawa and herein collectively referred to as the "carriers" in the proceeding initiated by Public Notice CRTC 2001-99
Document: 020215.doc - 53KO
2002/02/15 - TELUS Communications Inc.
In accordance with the procedures set out by the Commission in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2001-99, as amended, attached are the reply comments by TELUS Communications Inc. ("TELUS").
Document: 020215.zip - 101KO
2002/02/15 - City of Vancouver
This is the Reply of the City of Vancouver ("Vancouver") in response to the Comments submitted in this proceeding
Document: 020215.wpd - 36KO
2002/02/15 - City of Edmonton
The City of Edmonton ("Edmonton") agrees with and adopts the Reply Comments from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the cities of Toronto, Ottawa, Calgary and Vancouver.
Document: 020215.doc - 35KO
2002/02/15 - City of Calgary
Reply Comments of The City of Calgary in Public Notice CRTC 2001-99 Terms and Conditions of Existing Agreements for Access to Municipal Property
Document: 020215.doc - 57KO
2002/02/15 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: CCTA provides reply comments to the Commission with respect to the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 020215.doc - 60KO
2002/02/15 - Federation of Canadian Municipalities
These Reply Comments are being filed on behalf of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities ("FCM") pursuant to paragraph 9 of Public Notice CRTC 2001-99, dated 31 August 2001, as further amended by Commission letters dated 12 October 2001, 5 November 2001 and 16 November 2001, as well as Decision CRTC 2001-753.
Document: 020215.doc - 114KO
2002/02/15 - GT Group Telecom Services Corp.
GT Group Telecom Services Corp. on behalf of itself and Call-Net Enterprises Inc. files the attached reply comments.
Document: 020215.zip - 48 KO
2002/02/15 - Futureway Communications Inc.
Futureway hereby submits its reply comments.
Document: 020215.doc - 338KO
Section 4i) Autres
Aucun documents
Section 5 - Réponses aux demandes de renseignements
Aucun documents
Section 8 - Documents divers
Aucun documents
- Date de modification :