Review of usage-based billing for wholesale residential high-speed access services: 8661-C12-201102350
NC 2011-77-2 - Changes to procedure - 8 April 2011
NC 2011-77-1 - Notice of hearing - 17 March 2011
NC 2011-77 - Call for comments - 8 February 2011
NOTE: Approx. 100,832 comments (revised) in all were received of which 97,833 gathered by Openmedia.ca, 339 as form letters and 2660 individuals
File numbers: 8661-C12-201102350, 8638-C12-201014620, 8638-C12-201016882, 8740-B2-201018317 (TN 7293, 7293A), and 8740-B2-201017426 (TN 7290)
References: 8740-R28-2010180606 (TN 18), 8740-C6-201018052 (TN 34), 8740-S9-201017955 (TN 15), 8740-V3-201018201 (TN 37, 37A)
References: 8740-B2-201017426 (TN 7290), 8740-B54-201017401 (TN 345), 8740-B2-201018317 (TN 7293, 7293A), 8740-B54-201018300 (TN 349, 349A), 8740-T66-201011410 (TN 391, 391A), 8740-M59-201017921 (TN 699), 8740-S22-201018474 (TN 246), 8740-T69-201017848 (TN 553B), 8740-B54-201107235 (TN
367), 8740-B2-201107251 (TN
7310), 8740-T66-201107152 (TN
407), 8740-A53-201107103 (TN
402)
Notice of Consultation 2011-77, 2011-77-1 and 2011-77-2 Schedule
Activities | Deadline Dates |
---|---|
Public Hearing | 2011-07-11 |
Request to appear | 2011-05-12 |
Notice of intention to participate | 2011-03-28 |
Commission and parties may requests information in the form of interrogatories | 2011-04-29 |
Responses to requests for information | 2011-05-24 |
Requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure | 2011-05-31 |
Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure | 2011-06-07 |
Comments for modifying the scope and terms of the proceeding | 2011-02-22 |
Interventions (all parties) | 2011-03-28 |
Comments (any persons) | 2011-05-12 |
Reply comments | 2011-04-29 |
Final written arguments | 2011-07-29 |
Interim rates for wholesale residential and business high speed access services | |
Written comments | 2011-05-30 |
Reply comments | 2011-06-01 |
Section 1 - Commission Documents
a) Notice of Consultation, Decisions, etc.
b) List
of Parties
c) Correspondence to Parties
d) Requests for information
e) Documents tabled by the Commission at the hearing
Section 4 - Documents from Parties
a) Correspondence to the Commission
b) Comments (see note at top of this page)
c) Comments for modifying the scope and terms of the proceeding
d) Interventions
e) Request to appear
f) Reply comments
g) Requests for information
h) Requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure
i) Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure (see section 5)
j) Final arguments
k) Procedural requests
l) Comments on Interim rates
m) Reply comments on Interim rates
n) Oral presentations and oral rebuttals
Section 5 - Responses to requests for information
Section 6 - Responses to undertakings
Section 7 - Transcripts
Section 8 - Miscellaneous Documents
a) Costs
b) Others
Section 1a) Notice of Consultation, Decisions, etc.
2012-06-11 - Telecom order CRTC 2012-328 Determination of Cost Award Determination of costs award with respect to the participation of the World Broadband Foundation in the Telecom Notice of Consultation 2011-77 proceeding
File numbers: 8661-C12-201102350 and 4754-400
2011-12-22 - Telecom regulatory policy CRTC 2011-703-1 Correction - Billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services
File numbers: 8661-C12-201102350, 8638-C12-201014620, 8638-C12-201016882, 8740-B2-201018317, 8740-B54-201018300, 8740-A53-201107103, 8740-M59-201017921, 8740-S22-201018474, 8740-T66-201011410, 8740-T69-201017848, 8740-R28-201018060, 8740-C6-201018052, 8740-S9-201017955, 8740-V3 201018201, 8740-B2-201107251, 8740-B54-201107235, and 8740-T66-201107152
2011-12-16 - Telecom order CRTC - 2011-786 Determination of costs award with respect to the participation of the Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic and its client OpenMedia.ca in the Telecom Notice of Consultation 2011-77 proceeding
File numbers: 8661-C12-201102350 and 4754-390
2011-11-15 - Telecom regulatory policies CRTC - 2011-704 Billing practices for wholesale business high-speed access services
File numbers: 8638-C12-201016882, 8740-T66-201107160, 8740-T69-201107045, 8740-T66-201011410, 8740-A53-201017864, 8740-B54-201017401, and 8740-B2-201017426
2011-11-15 - Telecom regulatory policies CRTC - 2011-703 Billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services
File numbers: 8661-C12-201102350, 8638-C12-201014620, 8638-C12-201016882, 8740-B2-201018317, 8740-B54-201018300, 8740-A53-201107103, 8740-M59-201017921, 8740-S22-201018474, 8740-T66-201011410, 8740-T69-201017848, 8740-R28-201018060, 8740-C6-201018052, 8740-S9-201017955, 8740-V3 201018201, 8740-B2-201107251, 8740-B54-201107235, and 8740-T66-201107152
2011-11-04 - Telecom Order CRTC 2011-690 Determination of costs award with respect to the participation of Jatinder Bhullar in the Telecom Notice of Consultation 2011-77 proceeding
File numbers: 8661-C12-201102350 and 4754-392
2011-11-04 - Telecom Order CRTC 2011-689 Determination of costs award with respect to the participation of Jean-François Mezei in the Telecom Notice of Consultation 2011-77 proceeding
File numbers: 8661-C12-201102350 and 4754-389
2011-11-04 - Telecom Order CRTC 2011-688 Determination of costs award with respect to the participation of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre in the Telecom Notice of Consultation 2011-77 proceeding
File numbers: 8661-C12-201102350 and 4754-391
2011-08-10 - Telecom decision CRTC 2011-482 Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. – Application for clarification and expedited relief concerning the manner in which cable companies intend to implement directives in Telecom Order 2011-377
File numbers: 8661-C12-201102350 and 8638-C12-201016882
2011-06-15 - Telecom Order CRTC 2011-377 Interim rates for wholesale residential and business high-speed access services
File numbers: 8661-C12-201102350 and 8638-C12-201016882
Section 1c) Correspondence to Parties
2012-03-28 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Munly Leong - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77 - Award of costs
2012-01-06 - Commission Procedural Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re: Request for extension of time regarding service charge associated with capacity model approved in Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2011-703
2011-12-21 - Commission Procedural Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re: Request for extension of time regarding service charge associated with capacity model approved in Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2011-703
2011-12-19 - Commission Procedural Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re:
Requests for extension regarding (a) Bell Canada Tariff Notice 7289 (Wholesale Wireless Broadband Service) and (b) Service charge associated with capacity model approved in Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2011-703
2011-10-06 - Commission Procedural Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic - Re: Application for award of costs in relation to Telecom Notice of Consultation 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services
2011-08-01 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Canadian Association of Internet Providers - Re: Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77 – Request for extension for filing of final comments
2011-07-28 - Commission Letter
Description:
Letter addressed to Jatinder Bhullar - Re: Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77 – Request for clarification of responses to undertakings
2011-07-22 - Commission Procedural Letter
Description: Letter addressed to distribution List - Re: Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77 - Undertakings Arising from Public Hearing
2011-07-08 - Commission Procedural Letter
Description: Letter addressed to distribution list - Re:
Request for disclosure of costing information filed in confidence – Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services (NoC 2011-77), as amended by NoC 2011-77-1 and NoC 2011-77-2, and Business Speed Matching proceeding
2011-07-07 - Commission Procedural Letter
Description:
Letter addressed to TELUS Communications Company - Subject: Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access service – Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77 (“Notice 2011-77”) as amended – Telus Commission interrogatories and further response
2011-07-06 - Commission Procedural Letter
Description: Letter addressed to distribution list -
Subject: Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access service – Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77 (“Notice 2011-77”) as amended – Commission interrogatories
2011-07-05 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to distribution list - Re: Clarification of certain aspects of Telecom Order CRTC 2011-377 Interim rates for wholesale residential and business high-speed access services
2011-07-04 - Commission Procedural Letter
Description:
Letter addressed to distribution list - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services (NoC 2011-77), as amended by NoC 2011-77-1 and NoC 2011-77-2 – Organization and conduct of the public hearing
2011-06-13 - Commission Letter
Description:
Letter addressed to Distribution List -
Re: Request for disclosure of costing information filed in confidence and further responses to interrogatories - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services (NoC 2011-77), as amended by NoC 2011-77-1 and NoC 2011-77-2, and Business Speed Matching proceeding
2011-06-13 - Commission procedural Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services (NoC 2011-77), as amended by NoC 2011-77-1 and NoC 2011-77-2 – Organization and conduct of the public hearing
2011-05-31 - Commission Letter
Description:
Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re:
Interim rates for wholesale residential and business high speed access services
2011-05-24 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re:
Interim rates for wholesale residential and business high speed access services
2011-05-20 - Commission Letter
Description:
Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Interim rates for wholesale residential and business high speed access services
2011-05-19 - Commission Procedural Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, 8 February 2011, as amended (TNC 2011-77) and “Follow-up to Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632: Wholesale high-speed access services proceeding (cost studies – ILEC)” – Request to merge the two proceedings
2011-04-28 - Commission Procedural Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List -
Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77 (TNC 2011-77), Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, and business speed matching proceeding
2011-04-13 - Commission Procedural Letter
Description:
Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Follow up to Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632 (TRP 2010-632), Wholesale high-speed access services proceeding and TNC 2011-77 proceeding – Process issues
2011-04-05 - Commission Procedural Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re:
Follow up to Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632, Wholesale high-speed access services proceeding – Request for disclosure of costing information filed in confidence
2011-03-11 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, 8 February 2011 (Notice 2011-77) – Requests to modify the scope and terms of the proceeding
2011-02-15 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to
Distribution List - Re:
Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77 – Requests for modifying the scope and terms of the proceeding
Section 1d) Requests for information
2011-06-17 - Commission Procedural Letter
Description: Letter addressed to the distribution List - Re: Request for disclosure of costing information filed in confidence and further responses to interrogatories - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services (NoC 2011-77), as amended by NoC 2011-77-1 and NoC 2011-77-2, and Business Speed Matching proceeding
2011-04-29 - Commission Procedural Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re:
Request for additional cost information – Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services (NoC 2011-77), as amended by NoC 2011-77-1 and NoC 2011-77-2, and Business Speed Matching proceeding
2011-04-29 - Commission Procedural Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Request for information – Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services (NoC 2011-77), as amended by NoC 2011-77-1 and NoC 2011-77-2
2011-04-20 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77 (TNC 2011-77), Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services
Section 1e - Documents tabled by the Commission at the hearing
Document tabled by the Chairman
CNOC CRTC Presentation Jan 26, 2011 - tabled on 13 July 2011
Documents tabled by Commissioner Michel Morin
Rate Comparison - Cogeco, Rogers, Videotron, Shaw, Bell, MTS tabled on 13 July 2011
Rate Comparison - Cogeco, Rogers, MTS Allstream costs tabled on 12 July 2011
Rate Comparison - Bell Canada vs MTS Allstream Inc. tabled on 11 July 2011
Section 4a) Correspondence to the Commission
2011-12-19 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
Description:
In March 2008, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (with regards to their operations in Ontario and Québec) and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) introduced a technical ITMP with regards to their wholesale traffic, mirroring an ITMP already applied to their retail traffic, which managed peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing traffic during peak periods.
Document:
1654308.doc - 95KB
2011-07-29 – Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: Due to a due to a system crash late this morning, CAIP's final written submission in TNC 2011‐77 will be delayed.
Document: 1595835.pdf – 113KB
2011-07-28 - Jatinder Bhullar
Description: I have attached submission with needs for clarification which.was submitted yesterday
by cablecos. I have used their document with my requests nagged in red-rofit.-
Document: 1595418.zip - 809KB
2011-07-20 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby seeking clarification and confirmation of the deadline for parties to file the undertakings that they accepted during the oral public hearing portion of the proceeding which concluded on 19 July 2011.
Document: 1593335.pdf - 50KB
2011-07-15 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is in receipt of answers from Rogers
Communications Partnership (“Rogers”), Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (“Shaw”), Telus Communications Company
(“Telus”) and Quebecor Media on behalf of its affiliate, Videotron Ltd. (“Videotron”) to CNOC’s Part I
Application regarding the clarification of certain aspects of Telecom Order CRTC 2011-377 (“TO 2011-377”).
This constitutes the reply of CNOC. A failure by CNOC to address any position or argument of a respondent to
the Application should not be construed as acquiescence where doing so would be contrary to CNOC’s interest.
Document: 1591728.pdf - 31KB
2011-07-12 – TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of an Application filed by the Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) filed on July 4, 2011 (the “Application”), outlining specific concerns with respect to the interpretation taken by Shaw Communications Inc. (“Shaw”), Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P. (“Videotron”) and Rogers Communications Partnership (“Rogers”) regarding directives given by the Commission in Order 2011-377. In its Application, CNOC raises concerns regarding Shaw’s approach on interim rates for wholesale high-speed access services.
Document: 1591091.pdf – 95KB
2011-07-12 – Quebecor Media Inc. for Videotron G.P.
Description: Quebecor Media, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P. (Videotron), is in receipt of a Part 1 application from CNOC dated 04 July 2011 alleging a series of improper interpretations of Order 2011-377 by certain cable carriers.
Document: 1591093.pdf – 26KB
2011-07-12 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) is in receipt of a letter filed by the Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC) on 4 July 2011 raising two items related to Telecom Order CRTC 2011-377 (Order 2011-377) and one issue related to the Commission’s determinations in paragraph 71 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-69 (Decision 2004-69). CNOC requested expedited relief regarding all three matters.
Document: 1591095.pdf – 108KB
2011-07-12 – Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: In accordance with the Staff letter dated July 5, 2011 outlining process in regard to the Part I application from Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC) dated 4 July 2011 outlining concerns it has with respect to the interpretation taken by Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw), Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., (Videotron) and Rogers Communications Partnership (Rogers) in implementing the determinations set out in Telecom Order CRTC 2011-377 (Order 2011-377), Rogers herein files its comments.
Document: 1591097.pdf – 70KB
2011-07-04 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) has had the opportunity to review the tariff
pages filed by incumbents pursuant to Telecom Order CRTC 2011-377 (“TO 2011-377”) and has some specific
concerns with respect to the interpretation taken by three of the major cable carriers with respect to certain
specific matters. CNOC is asking the Commission to address these matters on an expedited basis given the short
time frame available until 14 July, 2011, which is the date on which the new interim rates, terms and conditions
are scheduled to come into effect.
Document: 1586759.pdf - 38KB
2011-06-03 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: On June 3rd, the Commission launched its online consultation on wholesale Internet access services. With a web site containing a video introduction.
Document: 1576059.pdf -
722KB
2011-05-24 - British Columbia Broadband Association (BCBA)
Description:
British Columbia Broadband Association (“BCBA”) is in receipt of a Commission staff letter dated May 20, 2011, regarding a proposal for interim rates for wholesale residential and business high speed access services. In the letter parties were invited to provide their views on Commission staff’s preliminary view on the method to establish the interim rate approach for these services
Document: 1573283.pdf - 285KB
2011-02-17 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: I am writing because I have serious concerns about the content and context of the announcement of the CRTC 2011-77 Notice of Consultation and request a re-framing of the consultation to ensure a meaningful result.
Document:
1512638.pdf - 750KB
2011-02-16 - Samuelson‐Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic
Description: CIPPIC writes in support of these requests to
broaden the scope of the consultation and to express its view that a more comprehensive
evidentiary record is necessary for a proper determination of the issues before the Commission.
Document:
1512310.pdf - 123KB
2011-02-11 -
Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc.
Description: By way of this letter,
Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. is requesting that the Commission expand the scope of the proceeding announced in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77 to include a comprehensive review of the regulatory framework applicable to all wholesale high-speed access services provided by incumbent local exchange carriers and cable carriers to their competitors and to include from the outset, in the expanded proceeding, an online consultation and a public hearing, and certain additional procedural steps.
Document:
1509191.pdf - 104KB
2011-02-10 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre for Consumers'
Association of Canada
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on its own behalf and as counsel to the Consumers'
Association of Canada (CAC), is writing with regard to the above-noted process.
Document: 1509185.pdf - 32KB
2011-02-03 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: On 24 January 2011, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) submitted Reply Comments with regards to Bell Aliant Tariff Notice 349 and Bell Canada Tariff Notice 7293 (the Tariffs). On 25 January 2011 the Commission issued Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-44, Usage-based billing for Gateway Access Services and third-party Internet access services (Decision 2011-44) in which it determined that usage-based billing (UBB) rates for an incumbent carrier's wholesale residential Gateway Access Service (GAS) and for a cable carrier's third-party Internet access services are to be established at a discount of 15 percent from the carrier's comparable UBB rates for its retail Internet services. In this decision the Commission also denied the Companies' request for a 60-day implementation period from the date of its decision noting that it was unduly long.
Document:
1546328.zip - 44KB
Section 4c) Comments for modifying the scope and terms of the proceeding
2011-02-22 - Mark Rubenstein
Description: Thank you very much for allowing interested parties to this Consultation an opportunity to comment on the request to modify the scope and terms of the proceeding. I have had a chance to review the submissions of a number of different parties. I am very interested in this issue and am writing to provide my personal comments on the requests.
Document: 1518116.pdf - 93KB
2011-02-22 - British Columbia Broadband Association
Description: The British Columbia Broadband Association (“BCBA”) is in receipt of a letter dated 15 February 2011 from the Commission (Ref.: 8661-C12-201102350) regarding submission of comments to the request from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (“PIAC”) on its own behalf and as counsel to the Consumers' Association of Canada (“CAC”), and from the Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”).
Document:
1517861.pdf - 360KB
2011-02-22 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers
Description: The Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) is in receipt of submissions from the
Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on its own behalf and as counsel to the Consumers’
Association of Canada (CAC), the Canadian Network Operators Consortium (CNOC) and
Vaxination Informatique, all requesting a change in scope and terms in the above mentioned
proceeding.
Document:
1517858.pdf - 214KB
2011-02-22 - Netflix Inc.
Description: Netflix Inc. submits these comments in support of the requests by the Canadian Network Operators Consortium and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre that the Commission expand the scope of the proceeding initiated by TNC 2011-77.
Document:
1517853.pdf - 2229KB
2011-02-22 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of a letter from Commission staff issued in response to separate letters filed by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (“PIAC”) and the Canadian Network Operators Inc. (“CNOC”) in relation to Notice 2011-77. In each of their letters, PIAC and CNOC have requested significant amendments to the scope and procedure of this proceeding.
Document:
1517845.pdf - 136KB
2011-02-22 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter of 15 February 2011, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby providing its comments regarding the scope of the proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Call for comments – Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, 8 February 2011 (TNC 2011-77).
Document:
1517842.pdf - 401KB
2011-02-22 -
Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description:
On 8 February 2011 the Commission issued Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services (TNC 2011-77) in which it requested comments on how best to implement the following principles with regard to ILEC and cable carriers' (collectively, the Incumbent Carriers') wholesale high-speed access services used by wholesale ISPs.
Document:
1517838.doc - 108KB
2011-02-22 - Cogeco Cable Inc., EastLink Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc. on behalf of Videotron G.P., Rogers Communications Partnership and Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: This submission is filed by Cogeco Cable Inc., EastLink Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc. on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., Rogers Communications Partnership and Shaw Communications Inc. in response to submissions filed by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of itself and the Consumers’ Association of Canada, the Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc., Vaxination Informatique, and The Samuelson‐Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic, in connection with Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77.
Document:
1517826.pdf - 127KB
2011-02-22 -
Saskatchewan Telecommunication (SaskTel)
Description:
Saskatchewan Telecommunication (SaskTel) is in receipt of letters from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on its own behalf and as counsel to the Consumers' Association of Canada (CAC) and from the Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc (CNOC) seeking drastic changes in scope in the above-noted proceeding.
Document:
1517759.doc - 57KB
2011-02-22 - Union des consommateurs
Description: Veuillez trouver ci-jointes les observations d’Union des consommateurs dans le cadre de l’avis
de consultation de télécom CRTC 2011-77.
Document:
1517738.pdf - 691KB
2011-05-12 - British Columbia Broadband Association (BCBA)
Description:
In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the Commission in Notice 2011-77 as amended, British Columbia Broadband Association (BCBA) files its notice of intention to appear at the oral hearing scheduled to commence on July 11, 2011.
Document: 1567892.pdf - 269KB
2011-05-12 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description:
Pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation TNC 2011-77-1, as amended, Distributel
Communications Limited (Distributel) hereby provides notice of its intention to participate in the
oral hearing for the aforementioned proceeding scheduled to commence on July 11, 2011.
Document: 1567560.pdf - 28KB
2011-05-12 -
Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 29 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77-1, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, dated 17 March 2011, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) hereby provide notice of their intention to appear at the Public Hearing scheduled for 11 July 2011.
Document: 1567546.doc -
70KB
2011-05-12 - Samuelson‐Glushko Canadian Internet Policy & Public Interest Clinic
as well as on behalf of our client, OpenMedia.ca
Description: I write you on behalf of the Samuelson‐Glushko Canadian Internet Policy & Public Interest Clinic
as well as on behalf of our client, OpenMedia.ca, further to paragraph 2 of Telecom Notice of
Consultation CRTC 2011‐77‐1, in order to provide you with notice of our intention to appear in
public hearings scheduled to begin on July 11, 2011, as part of the above noted proceeding.
Document: 1567526.pdf - 119KB
2011-05-12 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description:
Pursuant to paragraph 29 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-
77-1, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access
services, Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. hereby files its notice of
intention to appear at the oral hearing scheduled to commence on 11 July 2011.
Document: 1567426.pdf - 21KB
2011-05-12 - Jatinder Bhullar
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 29 of TNC CRTC 2011-77-1, I hereby provide notice of
intent to participate in the oral hearing that is scheduled to begin on July 11, 2011.
Document: 1567409.pdf - 757KB
2011-05-12 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 29 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011‐77‐1, Review of billing
practices for wholesale residential high‐speed access services, March, 17, 2011 (TNC 2011‐77),
the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) is providing notice of its intention to
appear at the oral hearing scheduled to begin on July 11, 2011.
Document: 1567403.pdf - 142KB
2011-05-12 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the Commission in Notice
2011-77 as amended, TELUS Communications Company files its notice of intention to
participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence on July 11, 2011.
Document: 1567343.pdf - 27KB
2011-05-11 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77 as amended (“TNC 2011-77”),
Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is hereby filing it notice of intention to appear at
the oral hearing in the proceeding initiated by TNC 2011-77.
Document:
1567334.pdf - 18KB
2011-05-11 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor
Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and Rogers Communications
Partnership (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 29 of TNC CRTC 2011-77-1, Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor
Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and Rogers Communications
Partnership (collectively the “Cable Carriers”) hereby provide notice of intent to have
a panel participating in the oral hearing that is scheduled to begin on July 11, 2011.
Document: 1567326.pdf - 81KB
2011-05-10 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:
Pursuant to paragraph 29 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77-1, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, 17 March 2011 (TNC 2011-77), MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) hereby provides notice of its intention to appear at the oral hearing that is scheduled to begin on 11 July 2011.
Document: 1566577.pdf - 47KB
2011-05-10 - Vaxination Informatique
Description:
As per the Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77-1 of march 17th 2011, Vaxination Informatique hereby files notice of its intention to participate in the 2011-77 public hearing to be held in Ottawa starting July 11 2011 and confirms its intentions to remain within alloted time...
Document: 1566571.pdf - 700KB
2011-05-10 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre on its own behalf and as counsel for the
Consumers' Association of Canada (PIAC/CAC)
Description: Further to the Commission’s directives at paragraph 2 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77-1, this is to confirm that the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on its own behalf and as counsel for the
Consumers' Association of Canada (PIAC/CAC) will participate in the oral hearing associated with the
above referenced proceeding scheduled to begin on 11 July 2011.
Document: 1566307.pdf - 26KB
2011-05-09 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 29 of NOC 2011-77, Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) hereby
provides notice of intent to have a panel participating in the oral hearing to be held in
Gatineau, Québec the week of July 11, 2011.
Document: 1566086.pdf - 67KB
2011-05-05 - The Samuelson‐Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC), on behalf of
its client, OpenMedia.ca
Description: The Samuelson‐Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC), on behalf of
its client, OpenMedia.ca, hereby respectfully submits its reply comments of April 29, 2011 in
the above noted proceeding.
Document: 1564932.zip -
1131KB
2011-04-29 - British Columbia Broadband Association (BCBA)
Description: In accordance to paragraph 4 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77-2, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, dated 8 April 2011 (“TNC 2011-77-2”), the British Columbia Broadband Association (“BCBA”) is providing the following reply comments to the interventions filed on March 28th with the Commission.|
Document: 1564857.pdf - 378KB
2011-04-29 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Vaxination Informatique submits its April 29th reply comments in accordance with the 2011-77-2 procedure published on April 8th for the "Review of usage-based billing for wholesale residential high-speed access services".
Document: 1562425.pdf - 342KB
2011-04-29 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of comments from numerous parties dated 28 March 2011. Pursuant to the procedure set out in Telecom
Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential
high-speed access services (“TNC 2011-77”), as amended, and the Commission’s letter
dated 13 April 2011, Primus hereby files its reply comments.
Document: 1562404.pdf - 24KB
2011-04-29 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out by the Commission in Telecom Notice of Consultation 2011-77, Review of usage-based billing for wholesale residential high-speed access services (TNC 2011-77), Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are filing the attached reply comments.
Document: 1562378.zip - 163KB
2011-04-29 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:
Pursuant to TNC 2011-77, Call for comments – Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, 8 February 2011 (TNC 2011-77), as amended by TNC 2011-77-1 and TNC 2011-77-2, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is providing its reply to comments filed by other parties on 28 March 2011.
Document: 1562358.pdf - 87KB
2011-04-29 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77-1; Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
herein files its Reply Comments.
Document: 1562344.zip - 204KB
2011-04-29 - Netflix Inc.
Description: Netflix Inc. submits these reply comments in the proceeding referred to above.
Document: 1562332.zip - 2150KB
2011-04-29 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out by the Commission in Notice 2011-77, TELUS files its Reply Comments for this proceeding. TELUS is in receipt of interventions filed by Sandvine Incorporated (“Sandvine”), the Canadian Association of the Deaf, Bell Aliant Regional Communications and Bell Canada (the “Bell companies”), the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of itself and the Consumers’ Association of Canada, Cogeco Cable Inc., Netflix Inc. (“Netflix”), Distributel Communications Limited, the Canadian Association of Internet Providers, Rogers Communications Partnership, the Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc., Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc., MTS Allstream Inc., the MRC de Papineau, Vaxination Informatique, the Sameulson‐Glushko Canadian Internet Policy & Public Interest Clinic on behalf of the OpenMedia Engagement Network and the British Columbia Broadband Association.
Document: 1562222.pdf - 116KB
2011-04-29 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media
Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and Rogers Communications Partnership
(the Cable Carriers)
Description: Please find attached the Reply Comments of Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media
Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and Rogers Communications Partnership
(collectively the “Cable Carriers”) filed pursuant to paragraph 21 of TNC CRTC 2011-77-1, as amended in TNC CRTC 2011-77-2.
Document: 1562136.zip - 171KB
2011-04-29 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description:
Pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77 as amended (“TNC 2011-77”),
Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is hereby filing the attached reply comments to
the comments filed by parties on 28 March 2011 in the proceeding initiated by TNC 2011-77.
Document: 1562039.zip -
62KB
2011-04-29 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on its own behalf and as counsel to Consumers' Association
of Canada (CAC), collectively "PIAC/CAC", is pleased to enclosed our reply comments on the abovenoted
process.
Document: 1562020.zip - 152KB
Section 4g) Requests for information
2011-04-29 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Please find enclosed Vaxination Informatique's interrogatory questions for the April 29th cycle of the 2011-77 Public Notice.
Document: 1562429.pdf - 731KB
2011-04-29 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out by the Commission in TNC 2011-77, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are providing in the Attachments, requests for information addressed to the Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI), on behalf of its affiliate Vidéotron.
Document: 1562413.zip -
57KB
2011-04-29 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description:
Pursuant to the procedure set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services (“TNC 2011-77”), as amended, Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. hereby files
interrogatories addressed to Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership,
Bell Canada and TELUS Communications Company
Document:
1562392.zip - 23KB
2011-04-29 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:
Pursuant to TNC 2011-77, Call for comments – Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, 8 February 2011 (TNC 2011-77), as amended by TNC 2011-77-1 and TNC 2011-77-2, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is submitting the attached interrogatories to Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, Bell).
Document: 1562244.pdf -
41KB
2011-04-29 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 4 of TNC 2011-77-2, Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. is hereby
filing its interrogatories in the above-cited proceeding. The interrogatories are posed in the following
attachments to the corresponding parties as follows:
Document: 1562233.zip -
45KB
2011-04-29 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the Commission in Notice
2011-77, attached are the interrogatories from TELUS Communications Company
addressed to the following parties.
Document: 1562208.zip - 297KB
2011-04-29 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and
Rogers Communications Partnership (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and
Rogers Communications Partnership (collectively the “Cable Carriers”) submit the
attached interrogatories addressed to Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc.
(CNOC), pursuant to paragraph 22 of TNC CRTC 2011-77-1, as amended in TNC
CRTC 2011-77-2.
Document: 1562193.zip - 109KB
Section 4h) Requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure
2011-07-06 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description:
Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is hereby filing certain requests for disclosure
of certain information filed in confidence and for a further response relating to responses to information requests
file provided on June 30, 2011 by:
Document: 1587792.zip -
29KB
2011-05-31 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-
77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, as
amended, Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) hereby submits the
following requests for disclosure of information contained in interrogatory responses from
Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and TELUS
Communications Company.
Document: 1578157.zip - 43KB
2011-05-31 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedure established by the Commission in Notice 2011-
77, as amended, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) files the
following request for further responses to interrogatories posed to Canadian
Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”), Netflix Inc. (“Netflix”) and to the
Canadian Association of Internet Providers (“CAIP”), on April 29, 2011.
Document: 1574826.pdf - 84KB
2011-05-31 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC) is hereby filing its requests for disclosure of certain information filed in confidence in responses to information requests by:
Document: 1574823.zip - 29KB
2011-05-31 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and
Rogers Communications Partnership (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and
Rogers Communications Partnership (collectively the “Cable Carriers”) submit the attached request for further responses from CNOC, pursuant to paragraph 24 of TNC CRTC 2011-77, as amended in TNC CRTC 2011-77-1.
Document: 1574813.zip - 80KB
2011-05-31 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out by the Commission at paragraph 24 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77-1, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services dated 17 March 2011, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada are filing the attached requests for further responses to interrogatories posed in their request for information and public disclosure of information that has been designated confidential.
Document: 1574810.zip -
52KB
2011-08-03 - The Samuelson‐Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC), on behalf of
its client, OpenMedia.ca
Description: The Samuelson‐Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC), on behalf of
its client, OpenMedia.ca, hereby respectfully submits its final comments of July 29, 2011 in the
above noted proceeding.
Document: 1599073.zip - 681KB
2011-07-31 - The Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description:
Much of the debate in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011‐77 can be traced to two
proceedings: Telecom Order CRTC 2007‐22 (the original “Speed Matching Decision”), and; CAIP's
April 2008 application regarding Bell Canada’s implementation of “traffic shaping” on the
wholesale Gateway Access Service (GAS).
Document: 1595939.pdf - 259KB
2011-07-29 - Interlink Connectivity Inc.
Description:
Interlink is a small independent ISP in Toronto and has been operating since 1998 with the principals of the company providing services and consulting in the Internet
arena since 1992.
Document: 1595935.pdf - 521KB
2011-07-29 – Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in TNC2011-77 as amended by TNC2011-77-1 and 2011-77-2, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits the following Final Comments.
Document: 1595833.doc – 81KB
2011-07 -29 – Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77-1; Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, Shaw Cablesystems G.P. herein files its Final Comments.
Document: 1595837.zip – 234KB
2011-07-29 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre and Consumers' Association of Canada (PIAC/CAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on its own behalf and as counsel to Consumers' Association of Canada (CAC), collectively "PIAC/CAC", is pleased to enclosed our final written reply on the abovenoted process.
Document: 1595841.zip – 197KB
2011-07-29 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and Rogers Communications Partnership (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Please find attached the Final Argument of Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and Rogers Communications Partnership (collectively, the “Cable Carriers”) filed pursuant to paragraph 34 of TNC 2011-77-1.
Document: 1595843.zip – 243KB
2011-07-29 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out by the Commission in TNC 2011-77, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada are filing the attached final comments.
Document: 1595846.zip – 698KB
2011-07-29 – TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the Commission in Notice 2011-77 and the Business Speed Matching proceeding, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) files its attached Final Argument for these proceedings.
Document: 1595852.zip – 346KB
2011-07-29 – Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: In a letter dated 13 April 2011, Commission staff clarified that issues related to the residential component of the wholesale high-speed access services (WHSAS) tariffs (including all of the cable carriers’ wholesale third party Internet access (TPIA) services) are being considered in the proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, as amended, in what can now be called the Residential Speed Matching Proceeding.
Document: 1595854.zip – 293KB
2011-07-29 – Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in TNC 2011-77, as amended, review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed internet services, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) hereby submits its final comments.
Document: 1595857.pdf – 104KB
2011-07-29 – Catherine Middleton
Description: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77 describes this consultation as “a review of its regulatory approach with regard to the terms upon which large incumbent telephone and cable carriers provide their services to wholesalers, who, in turn, provide high-speed Internet access to retail residential customers.” (preamble)
Document: 1595859.pdf – 86KB
2011-07-29 – MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77-2, 8 April 2011, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby providing its final comments in the above-noted proceeding to consider the incumbent telecom and cable carriers’ various proposals in relation to residential aggregated DSL access and third-party Internet Access (TPIA) services.
Document: 1595861.zip – 208KB
2011-07-29 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in the Commission’s letter dated 13 April 2011 for Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services (“Notice 2011-77”) and Follow-up to Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632, Wholesale highspeed access service proceeding (“Follow-up to Policy 2010-632”), Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. hereby files its final arguments.
Document: 1595866.zip – 208KB
2011-07-29 – Jatinder Bhullar
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in TNC201 1-77 as amended by TNC2011-77-1and 201 1-77-2, Jatinder Bhullar submits attached final Argument.
Document: 1595868.zip – 992KB
2011-07-24 - Andrew Moore
Description: Bell Canada’s push for volume-based pricing on wholesale can only be justified by their unwillingness to offer unlimited packages on the retail market and their fear that Over-The-Top services such as Netflix may push consumers to transfer their accounts to independents who are willing to offer them such packages.
Document: 1593742.pdf - 268KB
Section 4k) Procedural requests
2011-12-20 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”)
Description: This is further to the letter filed by Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) on 16
December 2011 with respect to the above-cited matters.
Document: 1655310.pdf - 77KB
2011-12-20 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:
MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is writing in response to a letter to the Commission from Bell Canada (Bell) on 14 December 2011 wherein Bell has essentially declared that it will not be compliant with a Commission’s determination in Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2011-703, Billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, (TRP 2011-703).
Document:
1654318.doc - 117KB
2011-12-20 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Vaxination Informatique is in receipt of responses from CNOC, MTS Allstream and Primus on the issue of
the delay of Bell Canada filing the remainder of its tariffs, as well as Bell Canada’s filings of December 19th.
Document:
1654206.pdf - 560KB
2011-12-20 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of the
Commission’s 19 December 2011 regarding comments on the extension request
contained in Bell Canada’s (“Bell”) 14 December 2011 letter.
Document:
1654203.pdf - 23KB
2011-12-18 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Vaxination Informatique is in receipt of Bell Canada’s December 14th letter requesting certain parts of its GAS service tariffs be filed on January 30th instead of December 19th while maintaining a February 1 implementation date.
Document:
1654201.pdf - 560KB
2011-12-16 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc.
Description: Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is in receipt of a letter dated 14 December 2011
(“Bell Letter”) from Bell Canada (“Bell”) with respect to the above-cited matter.
Document:
1654199.pdf - 21KB
2011-12-14 - Bell Canada
Description: On 16 November 2011, Bell Canada (or the Company) received a Commission staff letter that requested the Company to file, on 15 December 2011, an amendment to the Company's proposed General Tariff (GT) Item 5430 – Wholesale Wireless Broadband Service (WWBS) Tariff Notice 7289, to take into account the Commission’s determinations in Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2011-703 (TRP 2011-703).
Document: 1654209.doc - 50KB
2011-05-13 - Vaxination Informatique
Description:
On May 2nd 2011, CNOC issued a letter to the Commission asking that the 2011-77 process currently restricted to residential services be merged with the 2010-632 follow-up process now focused on wholesale services for business. Vaxination Informatique supports this request.
Document: 1567903.pdf -
708KB
2011-05-04 - Bell Aliant, Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies)
Description:
On 20 April 2011, the Commission issued certain of its requests for information early in this proceeding with regard to the costing of aggregated volume pricing (AVP) as well as the Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc (CNOC) proposal. On 29 April 2011, the Companies filed their reply comments and issued certain requests for information to CNOC to better understand their proposal.
Document: 1564693.doc - 75KB
2011-05-02 - British Columbia Broadband Association (BCBA)
Description:
The British Columbia Broadband Association (“BCBA”) is in receipt of a letter dated 2 May 2011 from the Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) requesting that the Commission join the two above mentioned proceedings into one (“Merged Proceeding”).
Document: 1564862.pdf -
294KB
2011-05-02 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is writing to appeal to the Commission a
determination made by Commission staff in a letter dated 13 April 2011 (“Staff Letter”) in the above-cited
proceedings. More specifically, CNOC is requesting that the Commission join the two proceedings into a
single proceeding (“Merged Proceeding”) by making only the following specific changes, namely:
Document:
1562832.pdf - 36KB
2011-04-29 - Bell Aliant, Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description:
Bell Aliant, Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) would like to thank the Commission for sending certain of its interrogatories early in this proceeding with regard to the costing of aggregated volume pricing (AVP) as well as the Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc (CNOC) proposal. These early interrogatories have helped the Companies to determine what further clarifications are required from CNOC in order to initiate a cost study of their proposal.
Document: 1562366.doc - 74KB
2011-04-12 - British Columbia Broadband Association (BCBA)
Description:
BC Broadband Association (“BCBA”) is in receipt of a letter filed by TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) dated April 8, 2011 requesting changes to certain filing dates to amend the procedures set in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77-2 (“2011-77-2”). In response to the request by TELUS, the following parties filed comments: Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”), Shaw Communications Inc. (“Shaw”), Bell Aliant, Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively “the Companies”), Vaxination Informatique (“Vaxination”) and Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and Rogers Communications Partnership (collectively the “Cable Carriers”).
Document: 1556773.pdf - 444KB
2011-04-12 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and Rogers Communications Partnership (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and Rogers Communications Partnership (collectively the “Cable Carriers”) are in receipt of a request filed by TELUS Communications Company (TELUS) to amend the procedures set in TNC CRTC 2011-77-2, dated April 8, 2011.
Document: 1554223.pdf – 100KB
2011-04-12 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Vaxination Informatique has received the correspondence from Bell Canada, CNOC, Shaw and Telus on the issue of process of the new combined 2011-77-2 consultation and has a few additional comments.
Document: 1554110.pdf - 680KB
2011-04-11 -
Bell Aliant, Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description:
On 8 April 2011 the Commission issued TNC 2011-77-2 in which it added certain tariff proceedings, as they relate to wholesale residential high-speed access service to the record of TNC 2011-77. In particular the Commission noted that the inclusion of these tariff proceedings "provides a more comprehensive record for the assessment of the alternative [wholesale billing proposals made in the TNC 2011-77 proceeding] and allows for disposition of the tariff proceedings [...] as part of [TNC 2011-77]." The Commission further amended the TNC 2011‑77 proceeding to allow all parties to file reply comments on interventions, regarding both comments made as part of TNC 2011-77 and interventions made in the tariff proceedings. On that same day the Commission and parties may also issue interrogatories regarding submissions made as part of TNC 2011-77 or the associated proceedings now made part of TNC 2011-77.
Document: 1553965.doc - 83KB
2011-04-11 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) is in receipt of a letter of 8 April 2011 from Telus Communications Company (Telus) requesting certain revisions to the
proceeding dates for TNC 2011-77 and follow-up proceedings to Telecom
Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632 (TRP 2010-632). Telus requested the revised
dates and processes in light the Commission’s decision to combine the
proceedings for TNC 2011-77 and TRP 2010-632.
Document: 1553962.pdf -
81KB
2011-04-08 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:
TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) files this letter
to request two changes in filing dates for the proceeding initiated by Notice 2011-
77. TELUS makes this request in light of the substantial changes the Commission
has now made to Notice 2011-771 and all of the issues that this proceeding now
encompasses.
Document: 1553960.pdf - 84KB
Section 4l) Comments on Interim rates for wholesale residential and business high speed access services
2011-05-30 - British Columbia Broadband Association (BCBA)
Description:
British Columbia Broadband Association (“BCBA”) is in receipt of a Commission staff letter dated May 20, 2011, regarding a proposal for interim rates for wholesale residential and business high speed access services. In the letter parties were invited to provide their views on Commission staff’s preliminary view on the method to establish the interim rate approach for these services. In addition, parties were also invited to provide their views on how the Commission should approach any retroactive adjustment to rates back to the date interim rates were established.
Document: 1574271.pdf -
397KB
2011-05-30 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Vaxination Informatique is in receipt of the Commission's May 20th letter concerning implementation of interim rates for the so called GAS-FTTN service (matching speeds). Included below are the comments on the issue.
Document: 1574092.pdf - 733KB
2011-05-30 - Jatinder Bhullar
Description: CRTC States: Instead, in staffs view it relies on market forces in the retail and business high speed
services markets as a benchmark for interim rates that allow for competitive pricing in the retail and
business market while still allowing for recovery of costs.
Document: 1574089.pdf - 3618KB
2011-05-30 – Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Cogeco is in receipt of the CRTC 20 May 2011 letter regarding the above mentioned subject in which parties are invited to provide their views on Commission staff’s preliminary view on the method to establish the interim rate approach for wholesale high speed Internet access services.
Document: 1573936.pdf – 40KB
2011-05-30 – Quebecor Media, for Videotron
Description: Quebecor Media, on behalf of Videotron, is in receipt of the Commission’s 20 May 2011 letter proposing an approach for implementing interim wholesale rates for Internet access services while the matters of incumbent telco and cableco speed matching and cableco Point of Interconnection (POI) aggregation are under consideration.
Document: 1573938.pdf – 44KB
2011-05-30 – TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) is in receipt of a Commission staff letter, dated May 20, 2011, requesting parties to provide comments on Commission staff’s preliminary view on the method to establish the interim rate approach for wholesale residential and business high speed access services, as well as comments on how the Commission should approach any retroactive adjustment to rates back to the date interim rates would be established. In addition, in a clarification letter dated May 24, 2011, Commission staff stated that the proposed approach to interim rates identified in the letter dated May 20, 2011 is “not intended to deal with or impact legacy speeds” for wholesale Internet services that are already being made available by the ILECs and cable companies.
Document: 1573941.pdf – 99KB
2011-05-30 – Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Rogers Communications (Rogers) is in receipt of a Commission staff letter dated 20 May 2011 outlining a proposed interim rate approach for wholesale Internet access rates and requesting comments on the proposed approach. Rogers herein provides its comments.
Document: 1573943.pdf – 60KB
2011-05-30 – MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In a letter dated 20 May 2011, Commission staff asked for comments on what they termed a “simplified approach” for establishing interim rates for the wholesale high-speed Internet access services filed by incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) and incumbent cable carriers pursuant to the Matching Speed proceeding (follow-up to Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632, Wholesale high-speed access services proceeding, 30 August 2010 (the Broadband Access Policy)) and/or Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Call for comments – Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, 8 February 2011 (TNC 2011-77), as modified by TNC 2011-77-1 and TNC 2011-77-2. MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby providing its comments on Commission staff’s preliminary view on the method to establish the interim rate approach for these services.
Document: 1573945.pdf – 57KB
2011-05-30 – Bell Canada
Description: Bell Canada is in receipt of a letter from the Commission dated 20 May 2011 which provides a proposed "retail minus" approach, as described below, for interim approval of the Company's proposed Gateway Access Service - Fibre to the Node (GAS-FTTN) and High Speed Access Service - Fibre to the Node (HSA-FTTN). In accordance with the process established in the Commission's 20 May 2011 letter, following are the comments of Bell Canada (or the Company) with respect to the Commission's proposed interim rate approach.
Document: 1573947.doc – 70KB
2011-05-30 – Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant or the Company) is in receipt of a letter from the Commission dated 20 May 2011 which provides a proposed approach for interim approval of the Bell Aliant's proposed Gateway Access Service - Fibre to the Node (GAS-FTTN) and High Speed Access Service - Fibre to the Node (HSA-FTTN) services in Ontario and Québec (Bell Aliant Central Tariffs); and Bell Aliant's proposed ADSL Access Service – Fibre to the Node (FTTN) (ADSL FTTN service) in Atlantic Canada. In accordance with the process established in the Commission's 20 May 2011 letter, following are Bell Aliant's comments with respect to the Commission's proposed interim rate approach.
Document: 1573950.doc – 70KB
2011-05-30 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of the Commission’s letter dated 20 May 2011. Pursuant to the procedure set out by the Commission, Primus hereby files its comments.
Document: 1573953.pdf – 79KB
2011-05-30 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) is in receipt of Commission staff letter dated 20
May 2011 (the “Letter”) outlining a proposed interim rate approach for wholesale
Internet access rates. In the Letter, Commission staff indicates that the intent of the
proposed interim rate approach is to provide competitors with access to higher speeds
and increased Point of Interconnection (POI) aggregation services as soon as possible.
Document:
1573928.pdf - 86KB
2011-05-30 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium
Inc. (CNOC)
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 20 May 2011, Canadian Network Operators Consortium
Inc. (“CNOC”) is hereby filing its comments with respect to staff’s proposal for interim rates for wholesale
residential and business high speed access services.
Document: 1573925.pdf - 43KB
2011-05-30 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is in receipt of a 20 May 2011 letter from Commission staff (“the staff letter”), proposing a methodology to be used to set interim rates for proposed tariffs which have been filed to implement speed matching services, as required by the Commission in Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632. SaskTel herein files comments on that proposed methodology as allowed in the procedure set out in the staff letter.
Document: 1573920.doc - 59KB
2011-05-30 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) and the Consumers' Association of Canada (CAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) and the Consumers' Association of Canada (CAC),
collectively "PIAC/CAC", are in receipt of a letter issued by Commission staff on 20 May 2011. In this
letter Commission staff set out a proposed approach to be followed by the Commission regarding the
deployment of wholesale high speed Internet services further to directives issued by the Commission in
Telecom Regulatory Policy 2010-632 (TRP 2010-632), pending disposition by the Commission of a
number of other proceedings.
Document: 1573721.pdf -
29KB
Section 4m) Reply comments on Interim rates for wholesale residential and business high speed access services
2011-06-01 -
Quebecor Media, for Videotron
Description: Quebecor Media, on behalf of Videotron, is in receipt of the comments of numerous parties in response to the Commission’s 20 May 2011 letter proposing an approach for implementing interim wholesale rates for Internet access services while the matters of incumbent telco and cableco speed matching and cableco Point of Interconnection (POI) aggregation are under consideration. The following are our reply comments.
Document: 1575329.doc - 145KB
2011-06-01 - Jatinder Bhullar
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 20 May 2411, Jatinder Bhullar is hereby providing its reply to the comments made by other parties on the staff’s proposal for establishing interim rates for the wholesale high-speed lntemet access seryices filed by incumbent local exchange carrers (lLECs) and incumbent cable carriers pursuant to the Matching Speed proceeding (follow-up to Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632, Wholesale high-speed access services proceeding, 30 August 2010 (the Broadband Access Policy)) and/or Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Call for comments - Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access servlces, 8 February 2011 (TNC 2011-77), as modified by TNC 2011-77-l and TNC 2011-77-2.
Document: 1575320.pdf - 6505KB
2011-06-01 - The Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: The Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) is receipt of comments filed on 30 May
2011 in response to Commission staff’s letter dated 20 May 2011, in which staff set out a “retail
minus” interim rate approach to be applied to (i) the ILECs’ new matching speeds and (ii) the
cable carriers’ POI aggregation services. 1 CAIP submits herein its reply to the comments
received.
Document:
1575314.pdf - 190KB
2011-06-01 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of comments dated 30 May
2011 from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, Saskatchewan Telecommunications
(“SaskTel”), Cogeco Cable Inc. (“Cogeco”), Qeubecor Media Inc. on behalf of Videotron
(“Videotron”), Shaw Communications Inc. (“Shaw”), TELUS Communications Company
(“TELUS”), Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”), MTS Allstream Inc., the Peace Region
Internet Society, The Canadian Network Operator Consortium, Jatinder Bhullar, Bell Aliant
Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Vaxination Informatique.
Pursuant to the procedure set out in the Commission’s 20 May 2011 letter, Primus hereby
files its reply comments.
Document:
1575309.pdf - 66KB
2011-06-01 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Rogers Communications (Rogers) is in receipt of written comments from Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC), Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco), Jatinder Bhullar, MTS Allstream Inc., Peace River Internet Society, Public Interest Advocacy Centre, Primus Canada (Primus), Quebecor Media on behalf of Videotron (Videotron), Rogers Communications (Rogers), Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Telus Communications Company (Telus) and Vaxination Informatique.
Document: 1575303.pdf - 60KB
2011-06-01 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant or the Company) is in receipt of comments from various Parties dated 30 May 2011 regarding a Commission staff letter dated 20 May 2011 which proposed that interim rates for Bell Aliant's proposed Gateway Access Service - Fibre to the Node (GAS-FTTN) and High Speed Access Service - Fibre to the Node (HSA-FTTN) services in Ontario and Québec; and Bell Aliant's proposed ADSL Access Service – Fibre to the Node (FTTN) (ADSL FTTN service) in Atlantic Canada be set at the "lowest retail access rate in the market" minus $7.50. In accordance with the process established in the Commission staff's 20 May 2011 letter the following are Bell Aliant's Reply Comments with respect to the Commission's proposed interim rate approach.
Document:
1575299.doc - 62KB
2011-06-01 - Bell Canada
Description: Bell Canada (or the "Company") is in receipt of comments from various Parties dated 30 May 2011 regarding a Commission staff letter dated 20 May 2011 which proposed that Gateway Access Service - Fibre to the Node (GAS-FTTN) and High Speed Access Service - Fibre to the Node (HSA-FTTN) interim rates be set at the "lowest retail access rate in the market" minus $7.50. In accordance with the process established in the Commission staff's 20 May 2011 letter, following are the Reply Comments of Bell Canada with respect to the Commission's proposed interim rate approach.
Document: 1575291.doc - 68KB
2011-06-01 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) is in receipt of written comments from Bell Aliant
Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Canadian Network
Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC), Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco), Jatinder Bhullar,
MTS Allstream Inc., Peace River Internet Society, Public Interest Advocacy Centre,
Primus Canada (Primus), Quebecor Media on behalf of Videotron (Videotron),
Rogers Communications (Rogers), Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Telus
Communications Company (Telus) and Vaxination Informatique in response to
Commission staff’s proposed interim rate approach.
Document: 1575288.pdf - 82KB
2011-06-01 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) is in receipt of comments from Bell Canada (“Bell”), Bell Aliant Regional Communications, L.P., British Columbia Broadband Association (“BCBA”), the Canadian Network Operators Consortium (“CNOC”), Cogeco Cable Inc., Jatinder Bhullar, MTS Allstream Inc. (“MTS Allstream”), the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, Primus Communications Canada Inc. (“Primus”), Peace Regional Internet Society, Quebecor Media, on behalf of Videotron, Rogers Communications Partnership, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Shaw Communications Inc., and Vaxination Informatique, all dated May 30, 2011, filed in relation to an approach for interim rate setting for wholesale high-speed access services proposed by Commission staff. In accordance with instructions from Commission staff, TELUS files the following Reply Comments.
Document: 1575280.pdf - 92KB
2011-06-01 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is in receipt of Comments regarding Commission staff’s proposal for setting interim rates for proposed tariffs which have been filed to implement speed matching services, as required by the Commission in Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632 (“the staff letter”). Comments have been received from: Peace Region Internet Society (PRiS); Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus); MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream); the Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC); Bell Canada; Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant); Vaxination Informatique (Vaxination) Rogers Communications (Rogers); TELUS Communications Company (TELUS); Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw); Cogeco; Quebecor Media Inc. (Quebecor); and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre and the Consumers' Association of Canada (PIAC/CAC).
Document: 1575214.doc - 61KB
2011-06-01 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description:
Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 20 May 2011, Canadian Network Operators Consortium
Inc. (“CNOC”) is in receipt of comments with respect to staff’s proposal for interim rates for wholesale residential
and business high speed access services from British Columbia Broadband Association (“BCBA”), Bell Aliant
regional Communications, Limited Partnership (“Bell Aliant”), Bell Canada, Cogeco Cable Inc. (“Cogeco”),
Jatinder Bhullar (“JB”), MTS Allstream Inc. (“MTSA”), Peace Region Internet society (“PRIS”), Primus
Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”), Public Interest Advocacy Centre (“PIAC”) and the
Consumers' Association of Canada (“CAC”), (collectively "PIAC/CAC"), Rogers Communications
Partnership (“Rogers”), Saskatchewan Telecommunications (“SaskTel”), Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
(“Shaw”), Telus Communications Company (“Telus”), Vaxination Informatique (“Vaxination”) and
Videotron Ltd. (“Videotron”).
Document:
1575197.zip - 59KB
2011-06-01 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 20 May 2011, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby providing its reply to the comments made by other parties on the staff’s proposal for establishing interim rates for the wholesale high-speed Internet access services filed by incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) and incumbent cable carriers pursuant to the Matching Speed proceeding (follow-up to Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632, Wholesale high-speed access services proceeding, 30 August 2010 (the Broadband Access Policy)) and/or Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Call for comments – Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, 8 February 2011 (TNC 2011-77), as modified by TNC 2011-77-1 and TNC 2011-77-2.
Document: 1575181.pdf - 55KB
Section n) Oral presentations and oral rebuttals
2011-07-19 – Vaxination Informatique
Description: Oral Rebuttal
Document : 1592227.pdf – 98KB
2011-07-19 – Jatinder Bhullar
Description : Oral Rebuttal
Document: 1592330.doc – 108KB
2011-07-19 – World Broadband Foundation
Description: Oral Rebuttal
Document: 1592408.pdf – 167KB
2011-07-19 – Claude Hénault
Description: Oral Rebuttal
Document : 1592356.doc – 30KB
2011-07-19 – MTS Allstream Inc.
Description : Oral Rebuttal
Document: 1592410.zip – 138KB
2011-07-19 – Andrew Moore
Description : Oral Rebuttal
Document : 1592415.pdf – 177KB
2011-07-19 – Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC/CAC)
Description : Oral Rebuttal
Document : 1592447.doc – 41KB
2011-07-19 - Samuelson‐Glushko Canadian Internet Policy & Public Interest Clinic on behalf of our client, OpenMedia.ca
Description: Oral Rebuttal
Document: 1592590.pdf – 1054KB
2011-07-19 – Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Oral Rebuttal
Document: 1592591.pdf – 84KB
2011-07-19 – Distributel Communications Limited
Description : Oral Rebuttal
Document : 1592593.pdf – 484KB
2011-07-18 – Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: Oral Rebuttal
Document: 1591876.pdf – 35KB
2011-07-18 – Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc. for Videotron G.P and Rogers Communicaons Partnership (Cable Carriers)
Description: Oral Rebuttal
Document: 1591887.doc – 320KB
2011-07-18 – Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Oral Rebuttal
Document: 1592007.doc – 44KB
2011-07-18 – British Columbia Broadband Association
Description: Oral Rebuttal
Document: 1592135.doc – 82KB
2011-07-18- TELUS Communications Company
Description: Oral Rebuttal
Document: 1592142.doc – 75KB
2011-07-18 – Bell Aliant and Bell Canada
Description: Oral Rebuttal
Document: 1592207.zip – 513KB
2011-07-14 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1591255.pdf - 578KB
2011-07-14 - World Broadband Foundation (Munly Leong)
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1591303.pdf - 740KB
2011-07-14 - Claude Hénault
Description: Présentation verbale
Document: 1591263.doc - 43KB
2011-07-14 - Jatinder Bhullar
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1591275.doc - 178KB
2011-07-14 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1591258.zip -
443KB
2011-07-13 – Andrew Moore
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1591078.pdf – 399KB
2011-07-13 – Kimberly Smith
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1591077.zip – 67KB (revised)
2011-07-13 – Public Interest Advocacy Centre and the Consumers’ Association of Canada (PIAC/CAC)
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1591076.pdf – 43KB
2011-07-13 – Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1591074.doc – 29KB
2011-07-13 – Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1591071.zip – 118KB
2011-07-13 – Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1591069.pdf – 85KB
2011-07-12 – Daniel Finnis
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1591066.doc -17KB
2011-07-12 – Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1591062.pdf – 93KB
2011-07-12 – Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Quebecor for Videotron G.P.
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1591054.zip – 154KB
2011-07-12 – CIPPIC OpenMedia.ca
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1591003.doc – 7952KB
2011-07-11 – British Columbia Broadband Association
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1590993.doc – 146KB
2011-07-11 – Mark Coatsworth
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1590988.pdf – 75KB
2011-07-11 – TELUS Communications Company
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1590954.doc – 98KB
2011-07-11 – Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (The Companies)
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1590895.zip – 218KB
Section 5) Responses to requests for information
2011-07-28 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Rogers Communications hereby files a revised response to Rogers(CRTC)20Apr11-1. A computational error was discovered that impacted Tables 13-15. Tables 13-15 have been revised and the corrected versions are now being submitted. An Abridged version of the revised Tables is being filed with interested parties.
Document: 1595382.zip - 51KB
2011-07-11 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of a Commission staff letter dated July 7, 2011, in which Commission staff requests that TELUS provide Tables 3, 4 and 5 associated with the Company’s response to interrogatory TELUS(CRTC)13Jun11-1. TELUS is providing the requested information in attachments to this letter
Document: 1589940.zip -180KB
2011-07-11 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 8 July 2011, Cogeco Cable Inc.
(Cogeco) hereby submits the enclosed supplemental version of its response to
Cogeco(CRTC)13Jun11-2 part b).
Document: 1589483.zip - 113KB
2011-07-10 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of a Commission staff letter dated July 8, 2011, in which Commission staff requests that TELUS file on the public record the proposed rates used in response to interrogatory TELUS(CRTC)13Jun11-1. TELUS is providing the requested information in attachments to this letter
Document: 1589336.zip - 93KB
2011-07-09 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Pursuant to Appendix 1 of the July 8, 2011 Commission staff letter, Rogers Communications hereby files an abridged version of response to Rogers(CRTC)13Jun11-1 part a) Attachment
Document: 1589303.zip - 49KB
2011-07-08 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description:
Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 8 July 2011, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are attaching their supplemental responses to the Commission's requests for information in keeping with the Commission's directions set out in Appendix 1 of its letter
Document: 1589279.zip - 80KB
2011-07-08 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter, dated 8 July 2011, addressing requests for disclosure of information designated as confidential in the proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, as amended by NoC 2011-77-1 and NoC 2011-77-2, and the Business Speed Matching proceeding, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is filing revisions to the abridged versions of the following responses to requests for information in the above noted proceedings
Document: 1589183.zip - 106KB
2011-06-30 - MST Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby filing its responses to the additional requests for information issued by the Commission on 13 June 2011 with respect to the supporting cost studies MTS Allstream filed pursuant to the Commission's directives in Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632, Wholesale high-speed access services proceeding, 30 August 2010 (the Broadband Access Policy).
Document: 1587300.zip - 152KB
2011-06-30 – Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: Pursuant to Commission staff letter dated 13 June 2011, it was requested that Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) provide the response to one interrogatory. SaskTel is providing the response to that interrogatory in the Attachment to this letter.
Document: 1585264.zip – 55KB
2011-06-30 – Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out by the Commission in its 13 June 2011 letter concerning requests for disclosure of information designated as confidential and further responses to interrogatories made in the proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services (NoC 2011-77), as amended by NoC 2011-77-1 and NoC 2011-77-2, and the Business Speed Matching proceeding, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership is attaching its response to the Commission's additional interrogatory set out in Attachment 3 of its letter.
Document: 1585266.zip – 42KB
2011-06-30 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out by the Commission in its 13 June 2011 letter concerning requests for disclosure of information designated as confidential and further responses to interrogatories made in the proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services (NoC 2011-77), as amended by NoC 2011-77-1 and NoC 2011-77-2, and the Business Speed Matching proceeding, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are attaching their responses to the Commission's additional interrogatories set out in Attachment 3 of its letter.
Document: 1586800.zip - 249KB (revised)
2011-06-30 – Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: Pursuant to the Commission’s letter dated June 17, 2011 in reference to a request for further disclosure posed by TELUS Communications Company on May 31, 2011, the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (“CAIP”) submits its response as requested in the Commission letter.
Document: 1585293.pdf – 149KB
2011-06-30 – TELUS Communications Company
Description: As requested by Commission staff in a letter dated June 13, 2011, TELUS Communications Company provides its revised costs and rates for the three proposed scenarios posed in Attachment 3 of the letter.
Document: 1585301.zip – 517KB
2011-06-30 – Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff 13 June 2011letter, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby submits the attached responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC.
Document: 1585311.zip – 293KB
2011-06-30 – Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Rogers Communications hereby files its responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC on June 13, 2011.
Document: 1585324.zip – 322KB
2011-06-30 – Quebecor Media Inc. for Videotron
Description: In accordance with the directives contained in the Commission’s letter of 13 June 2011, Quebecor Media, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby provides the enclosed responses to interrogatories received on the above-mentioned subject.
Document: 1585339.pdf – 688KB
2011-06-30 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Pursuant to Commission staff letter of 13 June requesting supplemental interrogatory responses,
Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) herein files its response to Shaw(CRTC)13June11-1.
Document: 1584927.zip - 325KB
2011-06-21 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: As requested by Commission staff in a letter dated June 13, 2011, TELUS
Communications Company (“TELUS”) files the following information on the
public record of this proceeding:
Document: 1582665.zip - 189KB
2011-06-21 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Pursuant to Commission staff letter of 13 June 2011directing the disclosure of
information designated as confidential, Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) herein files the
revised abridged versions of Attachments 1-5 of Shaw(CRTC)20Apr11-1(b).
Document: 1582652.zip - 102KB
2011-06-21 - Quebecor Media on behalf of Videotron
Description:
In accordance with the directive contained in Attachment 1 to the Commission’s letter of 13
June 2011, Quebecor Media, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby provides the
enclosed disclosure on the above-mentioned subject.
Document: 1582640.pdf - 157KB
2011-06-21 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description:
Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 13 June 2011, Cogeco Cable Inc.
(Cogeco) hereby submits the enclosed supplemental version of its revised response to
Cogeco(CRTC)20Apr11-2.
Document: 1582632.zip -
161KB
2011-06-21 -
Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 13 June 2011, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are attaching their supplemental interrogatory responses in keeping with the Commission's directions, to the extent set out in Attachment 1 of its letter.
Document: 1582609.zip -
117KB
2011-06-21 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 13 June 2011, Rogers hereby files its supplemental abridged interrogatory response to Rogers(CRTC)20Apr11-1 b.
Document: 1582602.zip - 71KB
2011-06-21 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is hereby filing a revised response to
interrogatory CNOC(Cable Carriers)29Apr11-7 TNC 2011-77 as required by the Commission.
Document: 1582091.zip - 1049KB
2011-06-07 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description:
Pursuant to the procedure set out by the Commission at paragraph 24 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77-1, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services dated 17 March 2011, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are filing the attached reply to requests for further responses to interrogatories posed in the requests for information and public disclosure of information that has been designated confidential that have been received from the Canadian Network Operators Consortium (CNOC) and Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus).
Document: 1578222.zip -
379KB
2011-06-07 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:
MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby filing a revised Attachment to MTS Allstream(CRTC)5Apr11-8 VDAS to add certain information that was inadvertently omitted when the Attachment was filed on 20 April 2011.
Document: 1578181.zip -
48KB
2011-06-07 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 25 of NoC 2011-77, Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) herein
attaches its response to requests for disclosure of confidential information received from
Canadian Network Operators Consortium (CNOC) on 31 May 2011
Document: 1577764.zip - 248KB
2011-06-07 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the Commission in Notice 2011-77, as amended, TELUS Communications Company files its attached response to a request for public disclosure in relation to this proceeding.
Document: 1577761.zip - 47KB
2011-06-07 - Quebecor Media Inc. for Videotron
Description: In accordance with the Commission’s directives in TNC 2011-77-2 and various procedural
letters, Quebecor Media, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby provides the enclosed
responses to requests for disclosure.
Document: 1577757.zip -
133KB
2011-06-07 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 25 of TNC 2011-77-1, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby
submits the enclosed responses to CNOC requests for public disclosure. As explained
in these responses, Cogeco is also filing revised responses to the following
interrogatories:
Document: 1577749.zip - 187KB
2011-06-07 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is hereby filing its responses to requests made
by Bell Aliant, Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the “Bell
Companies”), Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc. on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and Rogers
Communications Partnership (collectively, the “Cable Carriers”) and Telus Communications Company to certain
responses to interrogatories filed by CNOC on 24 May 2011.
Document:
1577743.zip - 66KB
2011-06-07 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Pursuant to TNC 2011-77 as amended, Rogers Communications (Rogers) hereby files its responses to requests for disclosure received from CNOC.
Document:
1577745.zip - 52KB
2011-06-06 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Please find attached the CONFIDENTIAL version of Rogers(CRTC)20Apr11-4 including the information to be provided later as referenced in Rogers May 24, 2011 submission. Rogers submitted the ABRIDGED version of this response for the public record in its May 24, 2011 and provided an electronic copy of that filing to interested parties via email.
Document: 1577732.pdf - 51KB
2011-05-25 – Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Rogers Communications hereby files revisions to two interrogatory responses filed yesterday, Tuesday, May 24th, with the CRTC.
Document: 1572567.zip – 85KB
2011-05-25 - British Columbia Broadband Association (BCBA)
Description: The BC Broadband Association (BCBA) is in receipt of a letter dated 29-April-2011 filed by TELUS Communications Company (TELUS) requesting to identify the specific TELUS wholesale regulated service to which BCBA is referring in the passage below:
Document: 1573293.pdf - 279KB
2011-05-24 – Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the process specified in paragraph 22 of NoC 2011-77-2 Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits responses to interrogatories received on 29 April 2011 from Commission Staff.
Document: 1572541.zip – 201KB
2011-05-24 – MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the process set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, 8 February 2011 (TNC 2011-77), as modified by TNC 2011-77-1 and TNC 2011-77-2, and the Commission staff letter dated 29 April 2011, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby filing its responses to the two costing interrogatories issued by the Commission on 29 April 2011.
Document: 1572561.zip – 56KB
2011-05-24 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications hereby files its responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC, TELUS and Vaxination Informatique.
Document: 1572422.zip - 319KB
2011-05-24 - Quebecor Media for Videotron
Description: In accordance with the Commission’s directives in TNC 2011-77-2 and various procedural
letters, Quebecor Media, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby provides the enclosed
interrogatory responses.
Document: 1572410.pdf - 302KB
2011-05-24 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 23 of TNC 2011-77-1, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby
submits the attached responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC, TELUS
Communications Company and Vaxination Informatique.
Document: 1572374.zip - 1496KB
2011-05-24 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out by the Commission in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77-1 Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services dated 17 March 2011, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are attaching their responses to the Commission's interrogatories. The Companies are also attaching responses to interrogatories received from the Canadian Network Operator's Consortium Inc. dated 29 April 2011, MTS Allstream Inc. dated 29 April 2011, Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. dated 29 April 2011 and Vaxination Informatique dated 29 April 2011. These interrogatories addressed the Companies' proposals in Tariff Notice (TN) 7310 and TN 367 to introduce General Tariff (GT) Item 5440 - Gateway Access Service – Fibre to the Node in Ontario and Québec.
Document: 1572271.zip - 665KB (revised)
2011-05-24 – Netflix Inc.
Description: Netflix Inc. files the enclosed responses to interrogatories from TELUS Communications Corp. in the proceeding referred to above.
Document: 1571816.zip – 180KB
2011-05-24 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is hereby filing its responses to interrogatories posed to it in this proceeding by the Commission, Bell Aliant, Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the “Bell Companies”), Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc. on behalf of itsaffiliate Videotron G.P., and Rogers Communications Partnership (collectively, the “Cable Carriers”) and Telus Communications Company.
Document: 1571851.zip – 340KB
2011-05-24 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out by the Commission in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77-1, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services dated 17 March 2011, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (or the Company) is attaching its responses to interrogatories received from the Canadian Network Operator's Consortium Inc. dated 29 April 2011 and Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. dated 29 April 2011. These interrogatories addressed the Company's proposals in Tariff Notice (TN) 402 to introduce General Tariff (GT) Item 640 - ADSL Access Service - Fibre to the Node (FTTN) in Atlantic Canada.
Document: 1571853.zip – 55KB
2011-05-24 – MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 23 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, 17 March 2011 (TNC 2011-77), MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby filing its responses to the interrogatories received from the Commission and the Canadian Network Operators Consortium (CNOC) on 29 April 2011.
Document: 1571867.zip – 126KB
2011-05-24 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and Rogers Communications Partnership (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and Rogers Communications Partnership collectively the “Cable Carriers”) submit the attached joint responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC and TELUS Communications Company pursuant to paragraph 23 of TNC CRTC 2011-77-1, as amended in TNC CRTC 2011-77. Joint responses are submitted as follows:
Document: 1571874.zip – 811KB
2011-05-24 – Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) herein files the following interrogatories received from the Commission on 20 April 2011 and 29 April 2011 and from Vaxination Informatique and on 29 April 2011:
Document: 1571881.zip – 602KB
011-05-24 – TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the Commission in Notice 2011-77 as amended, TELUS Communications Company files its attached responses to the interrogatories in relation to this proceeding.
Document: 1571898.zip – 717KB
2011-05-02 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) is in receipt of a Commission staff letter dated April 28, 2011, in which Commission staff requested that TELUS file on the public record all the information provided in Table 3 of the Company’s cost study filed on December 10, 2010, and its revised cost study filed on March 11, 2011.
Document: 1563545.zip - 189KB
2011-05-02 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is in receipt of a letter dated 29 April 2011 from
Bell Aliant, Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the “Bell
Companies”).
Document: 1562816.zip - 33KB
2011-04-20 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description:
Rogers Communications hereby files its responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC on April 5, 2011.
Document: 1559788.zip - 170KB
2011-04-20 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership in Ontario and Québec and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in the Commission's letter of 5 April 2011, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership in Ontario and Québec and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are filing the attached responses to the requests for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information.
Document: 1559651.zip - 476KB
2011-04-20 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership in the Atlantic Provinces
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in the Commission's letter of 5 April 2011, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership in the Atlantic Provinces (or the Company) is filing the attached responses to the requests for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information.
Document: 1559564.zip - 199KB
2011-04-20 - Quebecor Media (QMI)
Description:
In accordance with the directives contained in the Commission’s letter of 05 April 2011,
QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby provides the enclosed third round
interrogatory responses and second round disclosures on the above-mentioned subject.
Document:1559500.pdf - 420KB
2011-04-20 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures clarified in the CRTC 13 April 2011 letter regarding the above-noted proceeding and the directives enunciated in the CRTC 5 April 2011
letter, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby submits supplemental responses to the
following interrogatories:
Document: 1559396.zip - 385Kb
2011-04-20 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Pursuant to Attachment 1 of the April 5, 2011 Commission staff letter, Rogers Communications hereby files revised responses providing disclosure of information.
Document: 1559361.zip - 93KB
2011-04-20 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) herein files revised responses to Shaw(CNOC)4Feb11- 3, Shaw(CRTC)04Feb11-105 and Shaw(CRTC)15Sept10-107 as directed by the Commission in its letter of 5 April 2011 setting out its determinations in regards to
requests for public disclosure.
Document: 1558715.zip - 504KB
2011-04-20 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: In accordance with the process defined for TNC 2011-77-2 Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits responses to interrogatories received on 5 April 2011 and the 6 April 2011, from the Commission.
Document: 1559012.zip - 288KB
2011-04-20- MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby filing its responses to the interrogatories issued by the Commission on 5 April 2011 with respect to the supporting cost studies filed pursuant to the Commission's directives in Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632, Wholesale high-speed access services proceeding, 30 August 2010 (the Broadband Access Policy).
Document: 1558916.zip - 272KB
2011-04-20 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: In accordance with process defined for Follow up to Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632, Wholesale high-speed access services proceeding, 30 August 2010 , and Commission letter dated 5 April 2011, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) provides the disclosure of confidential information as requested for the following interrogatory
Document: 1558862.zip - 183KB
2011-04-20 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out in the Commission staff letter dated 5 April 2010, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is submitting a revised version of the abridged attachment to MTS Allstream(CRTC)4Feb11-106 VDAS, providing for the public record all maximum capacities for the V-AHSSPI Internet hardware.
Document: 1558692.zip - 51KB
2011-04-20 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) files its responses to the Commission’s interrogatories in relation to Policy 2010-632. Please note that TELUS will file its response to interrogatory TELUS(CRTC)5Apr11-2 no later than May 2, 2011.
Document: 1558763.zip - 1592KB
Description: In a letter dated April 5, 2011, Commission staff directed TELUS
Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) to file certain
information on the public record in relation to three interrogatory responses filed
on March 11, 2011 as part of the follow-up process to Policy 2010-632. TELUS
provides its response below.
Document: 1558074.zip - 183KB
Section 6 - Responses to undertakings
2011-07-27 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description:
Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) herein provides its responses to undertakings requested
during the Oral Hearing phase of TNC 2011-77.
Document: 1595087.pdf - 81KB
2011-07-27 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc. for Videotron G.P. and Rogers Communications Partnership (the Cable carriers)
Description:
Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., and Rogers Communications Partnership (collectively the “Cable Carriers”) are pleased to provide their response to an undertaking requested during the Oral Hearing phase of TNC 2011-77.
Document: 1595069.zip - 43KB
2011-07-21 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are pleased to provide their responses to undertakings requested during the Oral hearing phase of TNC 2011-77.
Document: 1593460.zip - 695KB
2011-07-19 - CIPPIC, on behalf of OpenMedia.ca
Description: CIPPIC, on behalf of OpenMedia.ca, hereby files its responses to the undertakings it gave at its
appearance before the Commission at phase I of the oral hearing in the above noted
proceeding on July 12, 2011.
Document: 1593582.zip - 1756KB
2011-07-19 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Responses to undertakings
Document: 1592595.zip - 97KB (revised)
2011-07-18 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are pleased to provide their responses to undertakings requested during the Oral hearing phase of TNC 2011-77.
Document: 1592264.zip - 340KB
2011-07-18 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) herein attaches a wholesale rate analysis undertaken in
response to questions asked by Commissioner Morin at the oral public hearing for NOC
2011-77.
Document: 1592275.pdf - 103KB
2011-07-18 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is hereby filing responses to the two
undertakings it gave to the Commission during its appearance at the oral hearing on July 12, 2011
Document:
1592201.zip - 42KB
2011-09-19 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt of an application for costs from Mr. Bhullar, dated September 9, 2011, in relation to his participation at the oral hearing for the proceeding initiated by Notice 2011-77. Pursuant to Rules 65 to 69 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Practice and Procedure (the “Rules”), TELUS responds to Mr. Bhullar’s application for costs.
Document: 1616969.pdf - 72KB
2011-09-12 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and TELUS Communications Company (collectively, the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and TELUS Communications Company (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of an application for costs dated 1 September 2011 from CIPPIC on behalf of its client OpenMedia.ca in relation to the above noted proceeding.
Document: 1614181.doc – 205KB
2011-09-12 – Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw)
Description: Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) is in receipt of a Cost Award Application filed by CIPPIC on behalf of OpenMedia.ca for participation in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77, Review of billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services (NOC 2011-77). Shaw is also in receipt of a letter filed by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada and TELUS Communications Company (collectively, the Companies) on 12 September 2011 in response to CIPPIC’s cost claim.
Document: 1614186.pdf – 132KB
2011-09-12 - Quebecor Media Inc. (Quebecor Media), on behalf of Videotron G.P. (Videotron)
Description: We are in receipt of the above-noted application for costs dated 01 September 2011. We are also in receipt of a response from Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and TELUS Communications Company (collectively, the Companies) dated 12 September 2011.
Document: 1614194.pdf – 23KB
2011-09-09 - Munly Leong
Description:
This application for costs and taxation is made under the "Final Costs" section starting at paragraph 65 of the
CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure (August 8th 2011 version) as a result of Munly Leong's participation
in the 2 phases of the 2011-77 public hearing in July 2011.
Document: 1701904.zip -
4397KB
2011-09-08 – Jatinder Bhullar
Description: This application for costs and taxation is made under the "Final Costs" section starting at paragraph 65 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure (August 8th 2011 version) as a result of Jatinder Bhulla/s participation in the 2 phases of the 2011-77 public hearing in July 2011.
Document: 1612722.pdf – 1MB
2011-09-06 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of an application for costs dated 25 August 2011 from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) in relation to the above-noted proceeding. The Companies do not object to the claimant's entitlement to costs or the amounts claimed.
Document: 1611540.doc - 69KB
2011-09-01 - The Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy & Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) on behalf of its client OpenMedia.ca
Description: The Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy & Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) on behalf of its client OpenMedia.ca hereby applies for an award of its costs in the above-noted proceeding pursuant to section 66 of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure, SOR/2010-277, as well as taxation thereof.
Document: 1610475.zip – 813KB
2011-08-25 - The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on its own behalf and as counsel to Consumers' Association of Canada (CAC), collectively "PIAC/CAC"
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on its own behalf and as counsel to Consumers' Association of Canada (CAC), collectively "PIAC/CAC", is pleased to hereby submits its costs claim in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1606729.pdf - 2515KB
2011-08-19 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: This application for costs and taxation is made under the “Final Costs” section starting at paragraph
65 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure (August 8th 2011 version) as a result of
Jean-François Mezei’s participation in the 2 phases of the 2011-77 public hearing in July 2011.
Document: 1603917.pfd - 1744KB
2012-02-10 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Rogers Communications Partnership (“Rogers”) hereby files a revised interim tariff page pursuant to Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2011-703 (TRP 2011-703) as amended by Telecom Decision 2012-60. This page replaces the corresponding page filed on December 19, 2011 pursuant to TRP 2011-703
Document: 1673076.zip - 86KB
2012-01-26 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: On December 19, 2011, pursuant to paragraph 190 of Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2011-703 (“CRTC 2011-703”), Rogers Communications Partnership (“Rogers”) filed revised tariff pages that corresponded to the Commission’s determinations in the Policy.
Document: 1665687.zip - 95KB
2012-01-17 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Rogers Communications Partnership (“Rogers”) hereby files revised tariff pages reflecting increases in speed for certain TPIA services.
Document: 1662599.zip - 115KB
2012-01-13 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Attached are changes to the TPIA Tariff (Tariff CRTC 26400) administered by
Cogeco Cable Inc. ("Cogeco"). The purpose of these revisions is to make
housekeeping changes to the attached tariff pages.
Document: 1661458.zip - 159KB
2011-12-19 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the companies)
Description: Approved tariff pages
Document:
1653997.zip - 161KB
2011-12-19 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission directive enunciated at paragraph 190 of Telecom
Regulatory Policy CRTC 2011-703, attached is revised tariff page 44 of the TPIA
Tariff (Tariff CRTC 26400) administered by Cogeco Cable Inc. ("Cogeco").
Document:
1653940.zip - 105KB
2011-12-19 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 190 of Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2011-703, Rogers Communications Partnership hereby files revised tariff pages that correspond to the Commission’s determinations in the Policy.
Document:
1653932.pdf - 159KB
2011-12-19 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:
MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is issuing its final-approved tariff pages (along with its previous interim-approved tariff pages that were approved in Telecom Order CRTC 2011-377, Interim rates for wholesale residential and business high-speed access services, 15 June 2011, and issued on 23 June 2011) for wholesale VDAS service associated with MTS Allstream’s TN 699/699A tariff notice applications
Document:
1653910.zip - 303KB
2011-12-02 - Société TELUS Communications
Description: Pages tarifaires approuvées
Document: 1645925.pdf - 174KB
2011-12-02 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Approved tariff pages
Document: 1646142.pdf - 95KB
2011-12-02 - Bell Aliant
Description: Approved tariff page
Document: 1646026.doc - 77KB
2011-12-02 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: Approved tariff pages
Document: 165960.zip - 55KB
2011-12-02 - Bell Aliant and Bell Canada
Description: Approved tariff pages
Document: 1645934.doc - 135KB
2011-12-02 - Bell Aliant
Description: Approved tariff page
Document:
1645920.doc - 76KB
2011-11-29 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 191 of Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2011-703; Billing
practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services, (TRP 2011-703) Shaw
Cablesystems G.P. herein issues revised tariff pages reflecting the approved rates for
our Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) service.
Document: 1644013.zip - 39KB
2011-10-15 - The Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy & Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) on behalf of its client OpenMedia.ca
Description: CIPPIC is in receipt of a submission from Bell in various subsidiary manifestations and TELUS
Communications Company dated September 12, 2011 (the “Bell Letter”), raising concerns in
answer to CIPPIC’s application for an award of costs associated with the above‐noted
proceeding and taxation thereof. CIPPIC is also in possession of submissions from QMI and
Shaw, also dated as above, supporting these concerns. CIPPIC is additionally in receipt of a
Request for Information under section 28(1)(a) of the recently revised CRTC Rules of Practice
and Procedure, SOR/2010‐277 (“Rules”) sent October 6, 2011. This constitutes CIPPIC’s
response to these collective matters.
Document: 1626790.pdf - 242KB
2011-09-09 – Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-482, Rogers hereby files tariff pages that correspond to the Commission’s determinations in the Decision.
Document: 1614270.zip – 108KB
2011-07-11 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Subsequent to the filing of its tariff pages containing the interim-approved rates for VDSL Data Access Service associated with Tariff Notice No. 699/699A, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) discovered a transcription error in a rate that appears on “2nd Revised Page 96” of its Special Services and Facilities Tariff (CRTC 24002) Item 5830.
Document:
1590575.pdf - 35KB
2011-06-27 - Quebecor Media Inc. for Videotron
Description: Quebecor Media Inc. (Quebecor Media), on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby provides the Commission with the attached revised publication of page 35B for General
Tariff CRTC 26950. The original version of this page was published on 23 June 2011
pursuant to the Commission’s directives in Order 2011-377.
Document: 1584128.pdf - 67KB
2011-06-23 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Interim approved pages as per Telecom Order CRTC 2011-377.
Document:
1586514.doc - 77KB
2011-06-23 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Approved pages as per Telecom Order CRTC 2011-377.
Document: 1584904.doc - 328KB
2011-06-23 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: In accordance with Telecom Order CRTC 2011-377, Interim rates for wholesale residential and business high-speed access services, (“Order 2011-377” or “the Order”) Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is issuing the attached tariffs for Wholesale Very high bit-rate Digital Subscriber Line (VDSL) Service.
Document: 1584118.zip -
91KB
2011-06-23 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the companies)
Description: Interim Approved tariff pages
Document: 1587289.doc - 295KB
2011-06-23 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership in Ontario and Québec and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description:
Interim Approved tariff pages
Document: 1584124.doc - 1114KB
2011-06-23 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description:
Pursuant to the Commission directive enunciated at paragraph 36 of Telecom Order
CRTC 2011-377, attached is revised tariff page 44 of the TPIA Tariff (Tariff CRTC
26400) administered by Cogeco Cable Inc. ("Cogeco").
Document: 1584110.zip -
55KB
2011-06-23 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Order CRTC 2011-377 (Order 2011-377), Rogers hereby files tariff pages that correspond to the Commission’s determinations in this order.
Document: 1584104.zip - 74KB
2011-06-23 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 36 of Telecom Order CRTC 2011-37; Interim rates for wholesale
residential and business high-speed services (Order 2011-37), Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
(Shaw) is issuing the attached tariff page to reflect the Commission’s determinations regarding interim rates for aggregated TPIA Points of Interconnection (POIs).
Document: 1584101.zip - 192KB
2011-06-23 - Quebecor Media Inc. for Videotron
Description: In accordance with the Commission’s directive at paragraph 36 of Order 2011-77,
Quebecor Media Inc. (Quebecor Media), on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby
provides the Commission with the attached newly published page 35B for General Tariff
CRTC 26950. This page sets interim basic usage charges for TPIA customers
interconnected at Videotron’s aggregated Point of Interconnection (POI) in Montreal,
which interim charges are expected to remain in place until the Commission renders its
decision in the proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-77.
Document: 1584096.pdf - 70KB
2011-06-23 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Please find attached copies of the revised tariff pages approved by the Commission as described below:
Document: 1584093.pdf - 63KB
2011-06-23 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraphs 35 and 36 of Telecom Order CRTC 2011-377, Interim rates for wholesale residential and business high-speed access services, 15 June 2011 (Order 2011-377), MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby issuing its approved interim tariff pages for VDSL Data Access Service that was filed in Tariff Notice No. 699 as amended in Tariff Notice No. 699A. MTS Allstream is also submitting the following explanatory information.
Document: 1584076.zip - 36KB
2011-06-22 - Société TELUS Communications
Description:
Vous trouverez ci-joint les copies des pages tarifaires approuvées par le Conseil tel que décrit ci-dessous.
Document:
1584090.pdf - 51KB
2011-02-10 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc.
Description: E-mail - Clarification Requested and Answer
Document:
1514175.doc - 41KB
Report
Transcripts from English-language online consultation
Transcriptions de la consultation en ligne (de langue française)
- Date modified: