2008-07-04 - # 8740-B54-200809288 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership - Access Service Tariff - TN 202 - Local Service Request (LSR) Rejection Charge


2009-12-23 - Telecom Order CRTC 2009-805 Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada – Introduction of Local Service Request Rejection Charge
File numbers:    Bell Aliant TN 202; Bell Canada TN 7144

2008-12-15 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
Description:
Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of letters dated 5 December 2008 from MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream), Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI) on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, and Rogers Communications Inc. ( Rogers ) providing comments on Bell Aliant Tariff Notice 202 (TN 202) and Bell Canada TN 7144 (TN 7144), which propose to introduce a local service request (LSR) rejection charge.
Document: 992454.doc - 92KB

2008-12-05 - Quebecor Media Inc.
Description: QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (Videotron), and in accordance with the Commission's procedural letter of 05 November 2008 , hereby provides its argument regarding TNs 202 and 7144, wherein Bell Aliant and Bell Canada (Bell et al.) propose to modify their access service tariffs to introduce a $90 Local Service Request (LSR) Rejection Charge.
Document: 988194.doc - 169KB

2008-12-05 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission’s letter of 5 November 2008 Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits the following additional comments in respect of Bell Aliant Tariff Notice 202 and Bell Canada Tariff Notice 7144 (collectively “Bell”) proposing to introduce a charge of $90 for every CLEC, WSP or ISP local service request (LSR) rejected by Bell in excess of 5% of the customer’s total number of LSRs per month.
Document: 987880.pdf - 96KB

2008-12-05 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with procedures outlined in a Commission letter of 5 November 2008, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the following comments on the above-referenced tariff notices submitted by Bell Canada and Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell).
Document: 987348.pdf - 75KB

2008-11-12 - Quebecor Media Inc.
Description: QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (Videotron), and in accordance with the Commission's procedural letters of 21 October and 5 November 2008 , hereby submits the attached responses to interrogatories received from Bell Aliant and Bell Canada (Bell et al.) and the Commission.
Document: 976464.zip - 128KB

2008-11-12 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedure set out in a letter issued by Commission staff on 5 November 2008, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is submitting the following responses to the interrogatories directed to MTS Allstream:
Document: 976382.zip - 115KB

2008-11-12 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
Description: In response to the Commission's letter dated 21 October 2008, which posed interrogatories regarding Bell Aliant Tariff Notice 202 and Bell Canada Tariff Notice 7144, and the amended schedule set out in the Commission's letter of 5 November 2008, the Companies are providing, in the attachments hereto, the information requested by the Commission, MTS Allstream Inc., Quebecor Media Inc. on behalf of its affiliate Vidéotron Ltd. and Rogers Communications Inc.
Document: 976258.zip - 256KB

2008-11-12 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits the attached responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC and The Companies pursuant to the procedures set out in the Commission’s letter dated 21 October 2008:
Document: 975728.pdf - 94KB

2008-11-05 - Commission Letter
File #: 8740-B2-200809296 - 8740-B54-200809288
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re: Bell Canada Tariff Notice 7144 and Bell Aliant Tariff Notice 202 - Local Service Request (LST) Rejection Charge

2008-11-03 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
Description: On 21 October 2008 the Commission issued a letter setting out the procedure to address appli ca tions by Bell Aliant Regional Communi ca tions, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) under cover of Tariff Notices 202 and 7144, respectively in which the introduction of Access Services Tariff Item 108, Lo ca l Service Request (LSR) Rejection Charge was proposed.
Document: 972617.doc - 64KB

2008-10-21 - Commission Letter
File #: 8740-B2-200809296 - 8740-B54-200809288
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re: Bell Canada Tariff Notice 7144 and Bell Aliant Tariff Notice 202 - Local Service Request (LSR) Rejection Charge

2008-10-21 - Commission Letter
File #: 8740-B2-200809296 - 8740-B54-200809288
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Bell Canada Tariff Notice 7144 and Bell Aliant Tariff Notice 202 - Local Service Request (LSR) Rejection Charge

2008-10-14 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the Commission’s procedural letter of 30 September 2008, Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) hereby submits the attached interrogatories to Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (the Companies) with respect to TNs 202 and 7144.
Document: 965029.pdf - 55KB

2008-10-14 - Bell Canada and Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (the Companies)
Description: In keeping with the new procedures issued by Commission staff at paragraph 9 of the Commission's 30 September 2008 letter regarding Bell Aliant Tariff Notice 202 and Bell Canada Tariff Notice 7144, the Attachments contain interrogatories to MTS Allstream Inc., Quebecor Media Inc. on behalf of its affiliate Vidéotron Ltd. and Rogers Communications Inc (collectively, the intervenors).
Document: 965015.zip - 50KB

2008-10-14 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 9 of the letter of 30 September 2008 from Commission staff, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the attached interrogatories to be individually answered by each of Bell Canada and Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership in respect to the proposed introduction of Local Service Request (LSR) Rejection Charge proposed in Bell Canada Access Services Tariff (CRTC 7516) Item 108, and Bell Aliant Access Services Tariff (CRTC 21562) Item 108.
Document: 965009.pdf - 64KB

2008-10-14 - Quebecor Media Inc.
Description: QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (Videotron), and in accordance with the Commission's procedural letter of 30 September 2008 , hereby submits the attached interrogatories to Bell et al. on the matter of TNs 202 and 7144.
Document: 964981.doc - 182KB

2008-09-30 - Commission Letter
File #: 8740-B2-200809296 - 8740-B54-200809288
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Bell Canada Tariff Notice 7144 and Bell Aliant Tariff Notice 202 -Local Service Request (LSR) Rejection Charge

2008-09-08 - Commission Letter
File #: 8740-B2-200809296 - 8740-B54-200809288
Description:  Letter addressed to Bell Canada - RE: Bell Canada Tariff Notice 7144 and Bell Aliant Tariff Notice 202 - Local Service Request (LSR) Rejection Charge

2008-09-05 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) have received further comments dated 27 August 2008 from Quebecor Media Inc. on behalf of its affiliate Vidéotron Ltd. (Vidéotron) and further comments dated 4 September 2008 from Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers), with regard to Bell Aliant Tariff Notice 202 and Bell Canada Tariff Notice 7144 (TNs 202 and 7144).
Document: 948075.doc - 916KB

2008-09-04 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) is in receipt of 15 August reply comments of Bell Aliant and Bell Canada (“Bell”) regarding TNs 202 and 7144.
Document: 747001.pdf - 51KB

2008-08-27 - Quebecor Media Inc. on behalf of Videotron Ltd.
Description: QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (Videotron), has obtained a copy of the 15 August 2008 reply comments of Bell Aliant and Bell Canada (the Bell Companies) regarding TNs 202 and 7144.
Document: 944733.doc - 162KB

2008-08-15 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (or the Companies) have received comments from Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers), MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) and Q uebecor Media Inc. ( Q MI) on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Interveners), with regard to Bell Aliant Tariff Notice 202 and Bell Canada Tariff Notice 7144 (TNs 202 and 7144).
Document: 939486.doc - 967KB

2008-08-04 - Quebecor Media Inc. on behalf of Videotron Ltd.
Description: QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (Videotron), is in receipt of TNs 202 and 7144, both dated 04 July 2008 , wherein Bell Aliant and Bell Canada (the Bell Companies) propose to modify their access service tariffs to introduce a Local Service Request (LSR) Rejection Charge.
Document: 934302.doc - 164KB

2008-07-31 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is in receipt of the above-noted Tariff Notice applications (the Applications), under which Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership's (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (Bell et al.) each propose to introduce a Local Service Request (LSR) rejection charge of $90.00 per rejected LSR in excess of 5% of the total number of LSRs per month for each CLEC, wireless service provider or Internet service provider (Competitors).
Document: 933638.pdf - 101KB

2008-07-28 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits the following comments in respect of Bell Aliant Tariff Notice 202 and Bell Canada Tariff Notice 7144 (collectively “Bell”) proposing to introduce a charge of $90 for every CLEC, WSP or ISP local service request (LSR) rejected by Bell in excess of 5% of the customer’s total number of LSRs per month.
Document:  931735.pdf - 81KB


Date modified: