2010-12-02 - #: 8638-C12-201017137 - Suivi de la décision CRTC 2010-900 - Révision des tarifs liés aux services de structures de soutènement des grandes entreprises de services locaux titulaires
Références : 8661-E17-201113068
Déposer en utilisant les services en ligne
Liste des parties intéressées = 15 décembre 2010
Observations =
3 mars 2011
Répliques aux observations =
14 mars 2011
2011-07-04 Décision de Télécom CRTC 2011-406 Suivi de la décision de télécom 2010-900 – Tarif de location de poteaux de service et questions liées à l’application d’un supplément
Numéro de dossier : 8638-C12-201017137
2013-03-07 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Please find attached a copy of the following revised tariff page as a result of Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-406, July 4, 2011.
Document: 1872580.pdf - 37KO
2011-09-23 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: On 12 July 2011, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) issued revised tariff pages (1st Revised Page 311I and 2nd Revised Page 311K) for Supplementary Tariff Special Services and Facilities Tariff Item 9600 to reflect the approval of the service pole rate in Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-406 (Decision 2011-406). The existing tariff pages (Original Page 311I and 1st Revised Page 311K) were also provided.
Document:
1619277.zip - 43KO
2011-07-14 - Bell Canada
Description: ISSUED PAGES - Decision 2011-406 - NST
Document: 1591598.doc - 89KO
2011-07-14 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description:
Issued Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-406.
Document: 1591580.doc - 81KO
2011-07-12 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In the attached, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is providing its revised tariff pages for Supplementary Tariff Special Services and Facilities Tariff Item 9600 to reflect the approval of the service pole rate in Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-406
Document: 1590866.zip - 67KO
2011-03-14 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 10 February 2011, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby providing its reply comments regarding the revision of service pole rates. Failure by MTS Allstream to address any argument or issue raised by any party should not be construed as agreement with or acceptance of such argument or issue where to do so would be contrary to MTS Allstream’s interests.
Document: 1531672.pdf - 85KO
2011-03-14 - Bragg Communications Inc., Canadian Cable
Systems Alliance, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc.
and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P. (Cable
Carriers)
Description: Please find attached the Reply Comments of Bragg Communications Inc., the Canadian Cable
Systems Alliance, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc.
and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P. (collectively, the “Cable
Carriers”) in the above-referenced proceeding.
Document: 1531663.zip - 354KO
2011-03-14 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:
TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) herewith files its Reply Comments in accordance with Decision 2010-900 and the modified procedure set out by Commission staff in the letter dated 10 February 2011 on “the Commission’s preliminary view that each ILEC’s revised service pole rate should be the same as the pole rate approved in this decision for that ILEC.”
Document: 1531651.pdf - 29KO
2011-03-14 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc.
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900 (“Decision 2010-900” or the “Decision”) and the
Commission’s letter dated 10 January 2010, Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is
hereby providing its reply comments with respect to the comments of other parties regarding the
Commission’s preliminary view that each ILEC’s revised service pole rate should be the same as the pole
rate approved in this decision for that ILEC.
Document: 1531594.pdf - 29KO
2011-03-14 -
Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite
Description:
Pursuant to the procedures established in a Commission staff letter dated 10 February 2011, the following constitutes the Reply Comments of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite.
document: 1531587.zip - 67KO
2011-03-03 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 67 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900 (“Decision 2010-900”) and the
Commission’s letter dated 14 January 2010, Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is
hereby providing its comments with respect to the Commission’s preliminary view that each ILEC’s revised
service pole rate should be the same as the pole rate approved in this decision for that ILEC.
Document: 1527247.pdf - 22KO
2011-03-03 - Bragg Communications Inc., the Canadian Cable
Systems Alliance, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc.
and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P. (collectively, the “Cable
Carriers”)
Description: Please find attached the Comments of Bragg Communications Inc., the Canadian Cable
Systems Alliance, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc.
and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P. (collectively, the “Cable
Carriers”) in the above-referenced proceeding.
Document: 1527241.zip - 351KO
2011-03-03 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) herewith files its Comments in accordance with Decision 2010-900 and the modified procedure set out by Commission staff in the letter dated 10 February 2011 on “the Commission’s preliminary view that each ILEC’s revised service pole rate should be the same as the pole rate approved in this decision for that ILEC.”1
Document: 1527093.pdf - 24KO
2011-03-03 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership's, Bell Canada's and Télébec, Société en commandite's (Télébec's) (the Companies')
Description: On 2 December 2010, the Commission issued Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900, Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers' support structure service rates (Decision 2010-900) in which it considered that two matters merit consideration in a follow-up proceeding (Follow-up to 2010-900). One matter was whether ILEC support structure service rates should include an explicit mark-up of 15% on Phase II costs is whether the Commission's preliminary view that each ILEC's revised service pole rate should be the same as the pole rate approved in Decision 2010-900 is correct. Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership's, Bell Canada's and Télébec, Société en commandite's (Télébec's) (collectively, the Companies') comments and reply comments with respect to the issue of an explicit mark-up were filed on 14 January 2011 and 24 January 2011 respectively.
Document: 1527065.zip - 751KO (révisée)
2011-03-03 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:
In Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900 Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers’ support structure service rates, 2 December 2010 (Decision 2010-900), the Commission requested parties to file written comments by 14 January 2011 – to consider the level at which revised service pole rates should be approved and the possible inclusion in support structure rates of an explicit mark-up on Phase II costs1.
Document: 1527051.pdf - 97KO
2011-02-10 - Lettre du Conseil
Description : Lettre adressée à la Liste de Distribution - Objet :
Processus de suivi établi dans la décision de télécom 2010-900 intitulée Révision des tarifs liés aux services de structures de soutènement des grandes entreprises de services locaux titulaires
2011-02-10 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description:
On 2 December 2010, the Commission issued Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900, Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers' support structure service rates (Decision 2010-900) in which it considered that two matters merit consideration in a follow-up proceeding (Follow-up to Decision 2010-900). The first matter is the inclusion in support structure rates of an explicit mark-up of 15% on Phase II costs.
Document: 1507880.doc - 86KO
2011-01-24 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 14 January 2011, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby providing its reply comments regarding the possible inclusion of an explicit markup on Phase II costs for support structures. Failure by MTS Allstream to address any argument or issue raised by any party should not be construed as agreement with or acceptance of such argument or issue where to do so would be contrary to MTS Allstream’s interests.
Document: 1493023.pdf - 75KO
2011-01-24 - Bragg Communications Inc., Canadian Cable
Systems Alliance, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw
Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd.
(the Cable Carriers)
Description: Please find attached the Reply comments of Bragg Communications Inc., the Canadian
Cable Systems Alliance, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw
Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the “Cable Carriers”) in the above-referenced proceeding.
Document: 1492969.zip - 359KO
2011-01-24 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 68 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900 and the Commission's letter dated 14 January 2011, Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. is hereby providing its reply comments to the submissions of other parties with respect to whether ILEC support structure service rates should include an explicit mark-up of 15 percent on Phase II costs.
Document: 1492957.pdf - 38KO
2011-01-24 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) herewith files its Reply Comments on “whether ILEC support structure service rates should include an explicit markup of 15 percent on Phase II costs” in accordance with Decision 2010-900 and the procedure set out in Commission's letter dated 14 January 2011.
Document: 1492830.pdf - 29KO
2011-01-24 -
Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Decision CRTC 2010‑900, Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers' support structure service rates, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite are filing their reply comments with regard to the inclusion in support structure rates of an explicit mark-up on Phase II costs.
Document: 1492684.zip - 62KO
2011-01-14 - Lettre du Conseil
Description : Lettre adressée à la Liste de Distribution - Objet :
Suivi du processus établi dans la décision de télécom 2010-900 intitulée Révision des tarifs liés aux services de structures de soutènement des grandes entreprises de services locaux titulaires
2011-01-14 - Bragg Communications Inc., Canadian Cable
Systems Alliance, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw
Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd.
(the Cable Carriers)
Description: Please find attached the Comments of Bragg Communications Inc., the Canadian Cable
Systems Alliance, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the “Cable Carriers”) in the above-referenced proceeding.
Document: 1488807.zip - 345KO
2011-01-14 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) herewith files its Comments in accordance with Decision 2010-900 and the Commission’s letter dated 14 January 2011. In this submission, TELUS is providing its Comments on the issue raised by the Commission in paragraph 67 of Decision 2010-900 on “whether ILEC support structure service rates should include an explicit markup of 15 percent on Phase II costs.”
Document: 1488520.pdf - 23KO
2011-01-14 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900, Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers’ support structure service rates, (Decision 2010-900), the Commission has requested the parties to file written comments by January 14th 2011 – to consider the level at which revised service pole rates should be approved and the possible inclusion in support structure rates of an explicit mark-up on Phase II costs.
Document: 1488024.pdf - 75KO
2011-01-14 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 67 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900 and the Commission's letter dated 24 January 2011, Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. is hereby providing its comments with respect to whether ILEC support structure service rates should include an explicit mark-up of 15 percent on Phase II costs.
Document: 1487986.pdf - 30KO
2011-01-14 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description:
On 2 December 2010, the Commission issued Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900, Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers' support structure service rates (Decision 2010-900) in which it considered that two matters merit consideration in a follow-up proceeding (Follow-up to 2010-900).
Document: 1487954.zip - 65KO
2011-01-12 -
Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: On 2 December 2010, the Commission issued Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900, Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers' support structure service rates (Decision 2010-900) in which it considered that two matters merit consideration in a follow-up proceeding (Follow-up to Decision 2010-900).
Document:
1486677.doc - 82KO
Mise à jour : 2013-03-13
- Date de modification :