Competitor Quality of Service Indicators Reports - 8660-C12-201000406
Pursuant to Decision 2005-20
See also Reports for previous years
Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
MTS Allstream Inc.
Northern Telephone Limited Partnership
Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Télébec société en commandite
TELUS Communications Company
2010-09-29 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-723 CISC consensus report – Competitor quality of service indicators regarding Applicability Statement 2 - File number: 8621-C12-01/08
2010-02-26 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-118 CISC Business Process Working Group – Non consensus report BPRE071a – Minimum requirement for the exchange of local service request and local service confirmation data - File number: 8621 C12 01/08
2009-10-23 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2009-664 CISC Business Process Working Group – Non-consensus report BPRE069a regarding the competitor digital network DS-1 service process - File numbers: 8621-C12-01/08 and 8660-M59-200816994
2009-08-21 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2009-514 MTS Allstream Inc. – Application concerning provisioning of competitor digital network services in accordance with competitor quality of service standards - File number: 8660-M59-200816994
2008-03-31 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2008-28 CISC Business Process Working Group – Non-consensus report BPRE064d regarding the use of line activity code types for competitor quality of service indicators - Reference: 8621-C12-01/00
2007-12-07 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-126 CISC Business Process Working Group – Non-consensus reports BPRE064b and BPRE064c to revise certain competitor quality of service indicator business rules per Telecom Decision 2006-59. Reference: 8621-C12-01/00.
2007-09-07 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-81 The Commission approves new reduced service intervals for Competitor Digital Network services, where facilities are available, as proposed by MTS Allstream Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications, and TELUS Communications Company, and directs that the implementation date for these new reduced service intervals be within 60 days of the date of this Decision. Reference: 8638-C12-200505349.
2007-07-13 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-54 CISC Business Process Working Group – Non-consensus report BPRE064a to revise competitor quality of service indicator business rules per Telecom Decision 2006-59. Reference: 8621-C12-01/00.
2006-09-21 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-59 Part VII application to review and vary Decisions 2003-72 and 2005-20. Reference: 8662-B2-200602278.
2006-05-26 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-34 Follow‑up to Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors, Telecom Decision CRTC 2005‑20 – Service intervals for provisioning CDN services and Type C loops. Reference: 8638-C12‑200505349.
2005-03-31 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20 Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors. Reference: 8660-C12-200315095.
- Date modified: