8660-C12-200303751 - Public Notice CRTC 2003-3 - Retailquality of service rate adjustment plan and related issues

Retail quality of service rate adjustment plan and related issues


Reference: 8678-C12-11/01, 8660-C12-05/00, 8660-C12-06/01


Public Notice 2003-3 Schedule

Activities  Deadline Dates
Notice of intention to participate 2003-04-10
Comments 2003-05-16
Evidence 2003-05-16
Interrogatories 2003-06-20
Responses to interrogatories 2003-08-12 (revised)
Requests by parties for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure 2003-08-25 (revised)
Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure 2003-09-09 (revised)
Determination to requests for further information and for public disclosure 2003-11-10 (revised)
Arguments 2003-11-24 (revised)
Reply arguments 2003-12-08 (revised)

List of Related Documents

Section 1 - Commission Documents
a) Public Notices, Decisions, etc.
b) List of Interested Parties
c) Correspondence to Parties
d) Interrogatories
e) List of Quality of Service Indicators and Standards for use with PN 2003-3

Section 2 - Documents from Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS, SaskTel, TCI, TELUS Québec and Télébec
a) Correspondence to the Commission
b) Interrogatories
c) Evidence / Comments
d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure
e) Responses to requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure
f) Arguments
g) Reply arguments

Section 4 - Documents from other parties
a) Correspondence to the Commission
b) Interrogatories
c) Evidence / Comments
d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure
e) Responses to requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure
f) Arguments
g) Reply arguments

Section 5 - Responses to interrogatories

Section 8 - Miscellaneous Documents
a) Costs
b) Others


Section 1a) Public Notices, Decisions, etc.

2005-03-24 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-17 The Commission finalizes the retail quality of service (Q of S) rate adjustment plan for the large incumbent local exchange carriers. Customer credits payable under the rate adjustment plan must be implemented by 30 June of each year to customers of record as of 31 May. No changes are made to the 13 Q of S indicators used in the interim Q of S rate adjustment plan and the Total Maximum Adjustment Value continues to be set at 5% of local service revenues. The standard adjustment table used to calculate the rate adjustment for each Q of S indicator is simplified. In addition, a requirement for a rate adjustment is added in the event that a Q of S indicator is missed for 5 or more months in a year, but is above the average minimum required performance level for the year. An audit mechanism is established and reporting requirements are also defined. Reference: 8660-C12-200303751

2004-09-14 - Telecom Cost Order CRTC 2004-12  Application for costs by the British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the British Columbia Old Age Pensioners' Organization et al. - Retail quality of service rate adjustment plan and related issues , Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2003-3. Reference: 8660-C12-200303751 and 4754-236.


2004-09-14 -Telecom Cost Order CRTC
2004-13  Application for costs by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumer Groups - Retail quality of service rate adjustment plan and related issues , Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2003-3. Reference: 8660-C12-200303751 and 4754-235.


Section 1c) Correspondence to Parties

2003-10-06 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Parties to PN 2003-3 - Re: Public Notice CRTC 2003-3 - Retail quality of service rate adjustment plan and related issues - Requests for further responses to interrogatories

2003-07-15 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Parties to Public Notice 2003-3 - Re: Retail quality of service rate adjustment plan and related issues, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2003-3 - Request for modification of schedule

2003-05-20 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Interested Parties to Public Notice CRTC 2003-3 - Re:   Request for consolidated List of quality of service indicators and standards


Section 1d) Interrogatories

2003-10-27 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Parties to PN 2003-3 - Re: Public Notice CRTC 2003-3 - Retail quality of service rate adjustment plan and related issues - Requests for further responses to interrogatories

2003/06/20 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to TELUS Communications Inc. (TCI) - Re: Retail quality of service rate adjustment plan and related issues - Interrogatories

2003/06/20 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re: Retail quality of service rate adjustment plan and related issues - Interrogatories

2003/06/20 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to AT&T Canada Corp.- Re: Retail quality of service rate adjustment plan and related issues - Interrogatories

2003/06/20 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Public Interest Advocacy Centre - Re: Retail quality of service rate adjustment plan and related issues - Interrogatories

2003/06/20 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU) - Re: Retail quality of service rate adjustment plan and related issues - Interrogatories


Section 2a) Correspondence to the Commission

2005-10-21 - Bell Canada
Description: This is further to the 31 August 2005 letter of Bell Canada, in which the Company advised that it intended to file an exclusion application within 21 days of the return to pre-strike performance levels.
Document: 051021.doc - 71KB

2005-08-31 - Bell Canada
Description: In both Decision 2005-17, Retail quality of service rate adjustment plan and Decision 2005-20, Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors, the Commission established a mechanism for considering possible exclusions from quality of service results where circumstances beyond the control of an ILEC may have caused the ILEC to fail to meet a performance standard
Document: 050831.doc - 70KB

2003-09-23 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description:  In its response to requests for further responses dated September 9, 2003, TELUS did not specifically note that TELUS (Québec) had received a request for further response from the Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU)
Document: 030923.pdf - 52KB

2003-09-11 - Saskatchewan Communications (SaskTel)
Description: SaskTel has just been made aware, that due to an incorrect e-mail address used by the Consumer Groups (see attachment), it did not receive the request for further responses to the following interrogatory responses filed on 12 August 2003:
Document: 030911.zip - 144KB

2003-06-25 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Limited Partnership (collectively, the Companies)
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Limited Partnership (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of a letter dated 20 June 2003 from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) entitled "Request for modification of schedule".
Document: 030625.doc - 516KB


Section 2b) Interrogatories

No documents


Section 2c) Evidence / Comments

2005-10-21 - Bell Canada
Description: This is further to the 31 August 2005 letter of Bell Canada, in which the Company advised that it intended to file an exclusion application within 21 days of the return to pre-strike
Document: 051021.pdf - 68KB

2003-05-16 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Limited Partnership
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Limited Partnership (collectively, the Companies) hereby file their evidence pursuant to Public Notice 2003-3, paragraph 19.
Document: 030516.doc - 731 KB

2003-05-16 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 19 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2003-3, TELUS Communications Inc. and TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. (collectively "TELUS") hereby jointly file their evidence on the issues within the scope of that proceeding
Document: 030516.zip - 48KB


Section 2d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure

No documents


Section 2e) Responses to requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure

2003/09/18 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: SaskTel hereby provides its response to the request by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty Organization and l'Union des consommateurs (collectively, the Consumer Groups) for further responses to the following interrogatories.
Document: 030918.doc - 58KB

2003/09/09 - Bell Canada
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Public Notice 2003 3, as modified by the Commission's letter of 15 July 2003, Bell Canada hereby provides responses to requests for further responses received on 25 August 2003 from the Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU) and from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty Organization and l'Union des consommateurs (collectively, the Consumer Groups).
Document: 030909.doc - 84KB

2003/09/09 - MTS Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Public Notice 2003‑3, as modified by the Commission's letter of 15 July 2003, Manitoba Telecom Services Inc. (MTS) hereby provides responses to requests for further responses received on 25 August 2003
Document: 030909.zip - 72KB

2003/09/09 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS Communications Inc. ("TELUS") has received requests for further responses to certain interrogatories from the Consumer Groups.
Document: 030909.doc - 40KB

2003/09/09 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Public Notice 2003-3 Aliant Telecom Inc. ("Aliant or "the Company") hereby submits its responses to requests dated 25 August 2003 for further responses to interrogatories submitted by the Company on 12 August 2003.
Document: 030909.doc - 54KB

2003/09/09 - Télébec, Limited Partnership
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2003‑3, as modified by the Commission's letter of 15 July 2003, Télébec, Limited Partnership ("Télébec") hereby provides its response to requests for further responses received on 25 August 2003 from the Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU) and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Document: 030909.zip - 29KB

2003/09/09 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Public Notice CRTC 2003-3, as modified by the Commissions letter of 15 July 2003, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel or the "Company") hereby provides its response for further responses received on 25 August 2003 from the Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU).
Document: 030909.doc - 58KB


Section 2f) Arguments

2003/11/24 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the Commission's letter of October 27, 2003, TELUS Communications Inc. and TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. (collectively TELUS) hereby files its Final Argument and three updated responses.
Document: 031124.zip - 72KB

2003/11/24 - Aliant Telecom, Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) & Télébec, Limited Partnership (the Companies)
Description: The Companies hereby file the attached argument pursuant to Public Notice 2003-3, as amended by the Commission's letters dated 15 July 2003, 6 October 2003 and 27 October 2003.
Document: 031124.doc - 591KB


Section 2g) Reply arguments

2003/12/08 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the Commission's letter of October 27, 2003, TELUS Communications Inc. and TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. (collectively TELUS) hereby files its Reply Argument.
Document: 031208.zip - 40KB

2003/12/08 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec, Limited Partnership. (collectively, the Companies)
Description: The Companies hereby file the attached reply argument pursuant to Public Notice 2003-3, as amended by the Commission's letters dated 15 July 2003, 6 October 2003 and 27 October 2003.
Document: 031208.doc - 527KB


Section 4a) Correspondence to the Commission

2003/06/20 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of The Consumer Groups
Description: The Consumer Groups are writing to request a minor modification of the schedule in this proceeding, in order to accommodate previously arranged summer holidays.
Document: 030620.doc - 29KB


Section 4b) Interrogatories

2003/06/20 - Rosenbloom & Aldridge on behalf of Telecomunications Workers Union
Descrition: Please find enclosed for filing with the Commission in the above-referenced proceeding, the interrogatories addressed by the Telecommunications Workers Union
Document: 030620.zip - 53KB

2003/06/20 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of The Consumer Groups
Description: Attached are interrogatories submitted by the Consumer Groups to other parties, as indicated, in respect of the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 030620.zip - 16KB

2003/06/20 - Allstream Inc. (formerly AT&T Canada)
Description: Allstream Inc. (Allstream), formerly AT&T Canada Corp, is filing the following interrogatories in accordance with the procedure outlined in paragraph 21 of Public Notice 2003-3
Document: 030620.doc - 250KB


Section 4c) Evidence / Comments

2003/05/16 - AT&T Canada
Description: The following are AT&T Canada Corp.'s (AT&T Canada) comments on the above‑noted public notice
Document: 030516.doc - 89KB

2003/05/16 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of The Consumer Groups
Description: In accordance with the above-mentioned public notice, the Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty Organization, and l'Union des consommateurs ("The Consumer Groups") hereby submit their evidence on the issues identified in PN 2003-3
Document: 030516.zip - 42KB

2003/05/15 - Rosenbloom & Aldridge on behalf of Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU)
Description: In accordance with the above-mentioned public notice, the TWU hereby submits its evidence on the issues identified in PN 2003-3
Document: 030515.doc - 57KB


Section 4d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure

2003/08/25 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of The Consumer Groups
Description: Further to Telecom Public Notice 2003-3 (TPN 2003-3), the Consumer Groups hereby submit requests for further responses to certain interrogatories posed by the Consumer Groups.
Document: 030825.doc - 45KB

2003/08/25 - Rosenbloom & Aldridge on behalf of Telecommunications Workers Union
Description: Please find enclosed for filing with the Commission in the above-referenced proceeding, further interrogatories addressed by the Telecommunications Workers Union
Document: 030825.zip - 54KB


Section 4e) Responses to requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure

No documents


Section 4f) Arguments

2003/11/24 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in paragraph 26 of Public Notice 2003-3 as amended by the Commission's letter of 27 October 2003, Allstream submits the following comments on the retail quality of service (QoS) plan for residential and business customers and related issues.
Document: 031124.doc - 276KB

2003/11/24 - Rosenbloom & Aldridge on behalf of Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU)
Description: Please find enclosed, for filing with the Commission in the above-reference, the argument of the Telecommunications Workers Union.
Document: 031124.zip - 49KB

2003/11/24 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of The Consumer Groups
Description: Please find enclosed the Final Argument submitted by the Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty Organization, and l'Union des consommateurs (The Consumer Groups).
Document: 031124.doc - 172KB

2003/10/21 - The British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description: This is the argument of the BC Old Age Pensioners' Organization, Council of Senior Citizens' Organizations of BC, federated anti-poverty groups of BC, Senior Citizens' Association of BC, and End Legislated Poverty, West End Seniors' Network, Tenants Rights Action Coalition collectively referred to for convenience only as "BCOAPO et al.", in this proceeding.
Document: 031021.doc - 51KB

2003/10/21 - The City of Calgary
Description: The City of Calgary is a registered party in this proceeding and is submitting its argument in accordance with the procedures outlined in PN 2003-3 and revised in the Commission's letter of 2003 July 15.
Document: 031021.doc - 596KB


Section 4g) Reply arguments

2003/12/11 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of The Consumer Groups
Description: The Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty Organization, and l'Union des consommateurs (The Consumer Groups) are in receipt of the Reply Argument filed by Bell et al. in the above noted proceeding.
Document: 031211.pdf - 162KB

2003/12/08 - The British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description:  This is the reply argument of BCOAPO et al to the final argument of TELUS Communications Inc. and TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. of November 24, 2003.
Document: 031208.pdf - 108KB

2003/12/08 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of The Consumers Group
Description: Please find enclosed the Reply Argument submitted by the Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty Organization, and l'Union des consommateurs (The Consumer Groups).
Document: 031208.doc - 62KB

2003/12/08 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Allstream has reviewed these comments and pursuant to the procedure set out in paragraph 26 of Public Notice 2003-3, as amended by the Commission's letter of 27 October 2003, Allstream has nothing further to add in Reply as it has addressed the issues raised at the final argument stage of the proceeding
Document: 031208.doc - 246KB


Section 5 - Responses to interrogatories

2004/02/24 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: Aliant Telecom submits its Business Rules for Retail Quality of Service Penalty Indicators re: PN 2003-3.
Document: 040224.zip - 197KB

2003/11/24 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the Commission's letter of October 27, 2003, TELUS Communications Inc. and TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. (collectively TELUS) hereby files its Final Argument and three updated responses.
Document: 031124.zip - 72KB

2003/11/14 - MTS Communications Inc.
Description: In its letter dated November 10, 2003, MTS filed its responses to the CRTC's interrogatories of October 27, 2003. Unfortunately, MTS was unable to file its reply to MTS(CRTC)27Oct03-208 PN 2003-3 until now.
Document: 031114.zip - 32KB

2003/11/10 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the Commission's letter of October 27, 2003, TELUS Communications Inc. and TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. (collectively TELUS) hereby file further responses as directed and also the responses to the Commission's supplemental interrogatories
Document: 031110.zip - 82KB

2003/11/10 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Limited Partnership (collectively, the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Public Notice 2003 3, as modified by the Commission's letter of 27 October 2003, the Companies hereby provide their response to interrogatory The Companies(CRTC)27Oct03-205 PN 2003-3.
Document: 031110_2.zip - 292KB

2003/11/10 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the above noted public proceeding, and as modified by the Commission's letter of 27 October 2003, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) provides the following interrogatory responses
Document: 031110.zip - 94KB

2003/11/10 - Bell Canada
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Public Notice 2003 3, as modified by the Commission's letter of 27 October 2003, Bell Canada hereby provides responses to the following interrogatories from the Commission:
Document: 031110_1.zip - 144KB

2003/11/10 - Télébec, Limited Partnership
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Public Notice 2003‑3, as modified by the Commission's letter of 27 October 2003, Télébec hereby provides responses to the following interrogatories from the Commission
Document: 031110.zip - 61KB

2003/11/10 - MTS Communications Inc.
Desciption: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Public Notice 2003‑3, as modified by the Commission's letter of October 27, 2003, MTS Communications hereby provides responses to the following interrogatories from the Commission
Document: 031110.zip - 65KB

2003/11/10 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2003-3, as modified by the Commission's letter of 27 October 2003, Aliant Telecom Inc. hereby provides responses to interrogatories from the Commission.
Document: 031110.zip - 86KB

2003/08/19 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Upon reviewing interrogatory response SaskTel(CRTC)20Jun03-106-2003-3, SaskTel has determined that it incorrectly calculated the Total Maximum Adjustment Value based on the interim rate adjustment plan as opposed to the Companies' proposal noted in Section 2.1.1 paragraph 25 of the evidence.
Document: 030819.zip - 30KB

2003/08/12 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: SaskTel hereby provides responses to interrogatories from the Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU) and the interrogatories addressed to SaskTel from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty Organization and l'Union des consommateurs (collectively, the Consumer Groups).
Document: 030812.zip - 226KB

2003/08/12 - Télébec, Limited Partnership
Description: Télébec Limited Partnership ("Télébec") hereby provides responses to interrogatories from the Commission, the Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU) and to those interrogatories addressed to each ILEC from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty Organization and l'Union des consommateurs (collectively, the Consumer Groups).
Document: 030812.zip - 75KB

2003/08/12 - Allstream
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 22 of the above mentioned public notice and as amended by the Commission's letter dated 15 July 2003, Allstream Corp. submits the following interrogatory responses.
Document: 030812.zip - 91KB

2003/08/12 - MTS Communications Inc.
Description: MTS hereby provides responses to interrogatories from the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission ("CRTC"), the Telecommunications Workers Union ("TWU") and to those interrogatories addressed to each ILEC from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty Organization and l'Union des consommateurs (collectively, "the Consumer Groups").
Document: 030812.zip - 153KB (Revised)

2003-08-12 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Limited Partnership
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Limited Partnership (collectively, the Companies) hereby provide responses to interrogatories from the Commission and Allstream Inc., and to those interrogatories addressed to Bell et al. from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty Organization and l'Union des consommateurs (collectively, the Consumer Groups)
Document: 030812_1.zip - 902KB

2003-08-12 - Bell Canada
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Public Notice 2003 3, as modified by the Commission's letter of 15 July 2003, Bell Canada hereby provides responses to interrogatories from the Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU) and to those interrogatories addressed to each ILEC from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty Organization and l'Union des consommateurs (collectively, the Consumer Groups).
Document: 030812.zip - 115KB

2003-08-12 - TELUS Communications Inc. & TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 22 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2003-3, as modified by the Commission's letter of July 15, 2003, attached are the responses to the interrogatories
Document: 030812.zip - 2,274KB

2003-08-12 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc. hereby provides responses to interrogatories from the Commission, and to those interrogatories addressed to each ILEC from the Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU), and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumers' Association of Canada, the National Anti-Poverty Organization and I'Union des consommateurs (collectively, the Consumer Groups).
Document: 030812.zip - 201KB

2003-08-12 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) on behalf of The Consumer Groups
Description: Further to the above-noted Public Notice, and the subsequent CRTC procedural letter dated July 15, 2003, attached are interrogatory responses of the Consumer Groups in respect of the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 030812.zip - 29KB

2003-08-11 - Rosenbloom & Aldridge on behalf of Telecomunications Workers Union
Description: Please find enclosed for filing with the Commission in the above-referenced proceeding, the responses of the Telecommunications Workers Union (TWU) to interrogatories directed to the TWU in this proceeding.
Document: 030811.zip - 5,784KB


Section 8a) Costs

2004-04-06 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite, (collectively, the Companies)
Description: The Companies have received the application for costs of the Consumers' Association of Canada, National Anti-Poverty Organization, and L'Union des Consommateurs, in the above noted proceeding. The Companies do not oppose the applicants' entitlement or the amount claimed.
Document: 040406_6.doc - 514KB

2004-04-06 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec, société en commandite, (collectively, the Companies)
Description: The Companies have received the application for costs of the BC Old Age Pensioners' Organization, Council of Senior Citizens' Organizations of BC, federated anti-poverty groups of BC, Senior Citizens' Association of BC, West End Seniors' Network, End Legislated Poverty, and Tenants Rights Action Coalition in the above noted proceeding. The Companies do not oppose the applicants' entitlement or the amount claimed.
Document: 040406_5.doc - 514KB

2004-01-12 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description:  This is an application for costs by the Consumer Group to cover its participation in the above-noted PN 2003-3.
Document: 040112.pdf - 927KB

2004-01-12 - The British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre
Description:  The British Columbia Old Age Pensioners' Organization et al applies for costs in these proceedings.
Document: 040112.pdf - 975KB


Section 8b) Others

2005-06-30 - MTS Allstream
Description: Pursuant to the Commission’s directions at paragraph 278 of Decision 2005-17, MTS Allstream hereby notifies the Commission of the amount of the MTS customer credits applied over nine billing periods commencing 28 June 2005 to 26 July 2005.
Document: 050630.doc - 87KB

2005-04-25 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS Communications Inc. (“TELUS” or the “Company”) is hereby advising the Commission and interested parties that, due to circumstances beyond its control, it will not be filing its adverse event exclusion application today.
Document: 050425.doc - 34KB

Date modified: