2010-08-30 - #: 8638-C12-201015207 - Suivi de la Politique réglementaire CRTC 2010-632 - (Justification)
Déposer en utilisant les services en ligne
2012-02-14 - Décision de télécom CRTC - 2012-96 Groupe de travail Réseau du Comité directeur du CRTC sur l’interconnexion – Offre d’adresses IP statiques dans le cadre des services d’accès Internet de tiers
Numéro de dossier : 8638-C12-201015207
2011-05-17 - Politique réglementaire de télécom CRTC 2011-330 Attribution d’adresses IP statique dans le cadre des services d’accès Internet de tiers
Numéro de dossier : 8638-C12-201015207
2011-01-17 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter dated 9 December 2010 in the above-cited proceeding, Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. is hereby providing its reply comments with respect to the comments of the cable carriers and Vaxination Informatique concerning responses filed by a number of parties to interrogatories posed to them by the Commission on that date.
Document: 1489001.pdf - 43KO
2011-01-17 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd.,
Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (the
Cable Carriers)
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the
Cable Carriers) are in receipt of comments dated January 10, 2011 from the
Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC) and Vaxination
Informatique (Vaxination) on the matters raised in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1488985.pdf - 67KO
2011-01-10 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter dated 9 December 2010 in the above-cited proceeding. Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. is hereby providing its comments with respect to responses filed by a number of parties to interrogatories posed to them by the Commission on that date.
Document: 1485517.pdf - 36KO
2011-01-10 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Vaxination Informatique submits its January 10th comments as part of the TPIA fixed IP address "Show Cause" which is a follow-up top the wholesale high-speed access services proceeding (2010-632) file number 8638-C12-201015207.
Document: 1485402.zip - 291KO
2011-01-10 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd.,
Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the
Cable Carriers) hereby submit the following comments on the matters raised in
the above-noted follow-up proceeding to TRP 2010-632.
Document: 1485349.pdf - 77KO
2011-01-05 - Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI)
on behalf of Videotron Ltd.
Description: As promised in our letter to you of 22 December 2010, please find enclosed a response by
QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, to interrogatory QMI(CRTC)09Dec10-1 in the
above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1483267.pdf - 35KB
2010-12-22 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers
Description: The Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) provides the attached response to the
interrogatory posed to CAIP in the above noted proceeding.
Document: 1481284.pdf - 1201KO
2010-12-22 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Vaxination Informatique submits its December 22nd response to the Commission's December 9th interrogatory concerning TPIA fixed IP address capabilities in the TPIA environment as a follow-up to the wholesale high-speed access services proceeding (2010-632).
Document: 1481227.pdf - 310KO
2010-12-22 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) is in receipt of CRTC interrogatories, dated 9 December
2010, filed in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1481218.zip - 36KO
2010-12-22 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter dated 9 December 2010 in the above-cited proceeding, Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. is hereby filing the attached response to the sole interrogatory posed by the Commission to CNOC.
Document: 1481215.zip - 24KO
2010-12-22 - Shaw Cablesystems G.P.
Description: Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) herein files its responses to the interrogatories received from the Commission on 9 December 2010 in relation to the Show Cause to
Follow-up to TRP 2010-632.
Document: 1481207.zip - 132KO
2010-12-22 - Quebecor Media Inc.
on behalf of Videotron Ltd.
Description: QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, is in receipt of the Commission’s letter of 09
December 2010 posing interrogatories to the various parties participating in the above-noted
proceeding.
Document: 1481201.pdf - 22KO
2010-12-22 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Rogers Communications Partnership (Rogers) hereby files its interrogatory response to Rogers (CRTC)9Dec10-1 received from the Commission on December 9, 2010. Collective cable company responses to Cable Carriers(CRTC)9Dec10-2-6 are being filed under separate cover.
Document: 1481179.zip - 45KO
2010-12-22 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) hereby file their collective responses to interrogatories received from the Commission on December 9, 2010. These collective responses address Cable Carriers(CRTC)9Dec10-2-6. Individual company responses to ____(CRTC)9Dec10-1 are being filed under separate cover by the companies.
Document: 1481162.zip - 79KO
2010-12-22 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) is in receipt of a Commission staff letter dated December 9, 2010, requesting TELUS to provide interrogatory responses to interrogatories provided in the Appendix of the staff letter, as part of the proceeding noted above. TELUS provides the Company’s responses in the attachments to this letter.
Document: 1481156.zip - 114KO
2010-12-09 - Lettre du Conseil
Description : Lettre adressée à la Liste de Distribution - Objet :
Suivi de la Politique réglementaire de télécom CRTC 2010-632 intitulée Instance sur les services d’accès à haute vitesse de gros – (Justification) : Demandes de renseignements
2010-11-19 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) hereby file their reply to comments received from parties concerning the Cable Carriers’ comments filed on September 29, 2010 in response to paragraph 142 of Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632 (TRP 2010-632).
Document: 1464101.pdf - 90KO
2010-11-05 - Lettre du Conseil
Description : Lettre adressée à la Liste de distribution - Objet : Suivi de la Politique réglementaire de télécom CRTC 2010-632; Justification concernant les adresses IP statiques – demande de prolongation des câblodistributeurs
2010-11-03 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) filed their comments in response to paragraph 142 of Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632 (TRP 2010-632) directing the Cable Carriers to “show cause, within 30 days of the date of this decision, why they should not be required to provide static IP address allocation for their TPIA services” on September 29, 2010.
Document: 1458522.pdf - 51KO
2010-10-27 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Vaxination Informatique makes this submission in response to the September 29 comments from the Cable Carriers on the need for fixed IP addresses in the TPIA environment. Service differentiation is key to developing a regulatory environment which fosters competition and innovation. In their comments, the Cable Carriers have shown no interest in moving towards this goal.
Document: 1455797.pdf - 273KO
2010-10-27 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: The Canadian Association of Internet Providers (“CAIP”) is in receipt of comments filed
by Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc. on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd.,
Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications Inc. (“the Cable Carriers”)
responding to the show cause proceeding initiated by Policy 2010-632.
Document: 1455795.pdf - 52KO
2010-10-27 - Acanac Inc.
Description:
Acanac Inc. was a party to the proceeding leading to TRP 2010-632. Since its participation in
that proceeding, the Canadian Network Operators Consortium ("CNOC") has been formed and
will be taking a lead role in making regulatory submissions on behalf of its members.
Description: 1455788.zip - 50KO
2010-10-27 - Accelerated Connections Inc.
Description: Accelerated Connections Inc. (“ACI”) was a party to the proceeding leading to TRP 2010-632. Since ACI’s participation in that proceeding, the Canadian Network Operators Consortium ("CNOC") has been formed and will be taking a lead role in making
regulatory submissions on behalf of its members.
Document: 1455776.pdf - 17KO
2010-10-27 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink Telecom Inc (Execulink) was a party to the proceeding leading to TRP 2010-632. Since its participation in that proceeding, the Canadian Network Operators
Consortium ("CNOC") has been formed. Execulink is a member of CNOC and is
aware that CNOC has filed submissions in the above-cited proceedings today with
the Commission.
Document: 1455768.pdf - 21KO
2010-10-27 - Telnet Communications
Description: Telnet Communications was a party to the proceeding leading to TRP 2010-632 via its involvement with CAIP. Since its participation in that proceeding, the Canadian Network Operators Consortium has been formed and will be taking a lead role in making regulatory submissions on behalf of its members.
Document: 1455756.pdf - 284KO
2010-10-27 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Distributel Communications Limited (“Distributel”) was a party to the proceeding leading to TRP 2010-632. Since its participation in that proceeding, the Canadian Network Operators Consortium ("CNOC") has been formed and will be taking a lead role in making regulatory submissions on behalf of its members. Distributel is a member of CNOC and is aware that CNOC has filed a submission in the above-cited proceeding today with the Commission.
Document: 1455739.pdf - 22KO
2010-10-27 - Egate Networks Inc.
Description: EGATE NETWORKS INC. (“EGATE”) was a party to the proceeding leading to TRP 2010-632. Since its participation in that proceeding, the Canadian Network Operators Consortium ("CNOC") has been formed and will be taking a lead role in making regulatory submissions on behalf of its members. EGATE is a member of CNOC and is aware that CNOC has filed submissions in the above-cited proceedings today with the Commission. EGATE wishes to advise the Commission that it has reviewed those submissions, fully endorses them and that EGATE hereby incorporates them by references herein.
Document: 1455727.pdf - 141KO
2010-10-27 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) was a participant in
the proceeding leading to Telecom Regulatory Policy 2010-632, Wholesale highspeed
access service proceeding. Since its participation in that proceeding, the
Canadian Network Operators Consortium ("CNOC") has been formed and will be
taking a lead role in making regulatory submissions on behalf of its members in
certain regulatory proceedings.
Document: 1455718.pdf - 22KO
2010-10-27 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: TekSavvy Solutions Inc. was a party to the proceeding leading to TRP 2010-632. Since TSI's participation in that proceeding, the Canadian Network Operators Consortium has been formed and will be taking a lead role in making regulatory submissions on behalf of its members.
Document: 1455715.pdf - 26KO
2010-10-27 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium
Description: The Canadian Network Operators Consortium is pleased to provide its comments with respect to the above cited matter in accordance with the Commission's letter dated 5 October 2010.
Document: 1455698.pdf - 46KO
2010-10-27 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:
TELUS is in receipt of comments filed by Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc. on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively referred to as the “Cable Carriers”) in response to the show cause proceeding initiated by Policy 2010-632. In their comments, the Cable Carriers state that they “should not be required to provide business TPIA1 with static IP addresses.
Document: 1455693.pdf - 108KO
2010-10-05 - Lettre du Conseil
Description : Lettre adressée à la Liste de distribution - Objet : Suivi de la Politique réglementaire de télécom CRTC 2010-632 intitulée Instance sur les services d’accès à haute vitesse de gros - (Justification)
2010-09-29 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) hereby file their comments in response to paragraph 142 of Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632 (TRP 2010-632) directing the Cable Carriers to “show cause, within 30 days of the date of this decision, why they should not be required to provide static IP address allocation for their TPIA services.”
Document: 1445992.pdf - 83KB
Mise à jour : 2012-02-14
- Date de modification :