2008-12-18 - #: 8660-M59-200816994 - MTS Allstream Inc. - Demande concernant l'approvisionnement des services de réseau numérique propres aux concurrents conformément aux normes de qualité du service aux concurrents
Déposer en utilisant les services en ligne
2009-10-23 - Décision de télécom CRTC 2009-664 Groupe de travail Plan de travail du CDCI – Rapport de non-consensus BPRE069a concernant le processus lié au service de réseau numérique propre aux concurrents au débit DS-1
Numéros de dossier : 8621-C12-01/08 et 8660-M59-200816994
2009-08-21 - Décision de télécom CRTC 2009-514 MTS Allstream Inc. – Demande concernant la fourniture des services de réseau numérique propres aux concurrents, conformément aux normes de qualité du service aux concurrents
Numéro de dossier : 8660-M59-200816994
2009-10- 22 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out at paragraph 31 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2009-514, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) hereby provides comment as to why revised competitor Quality of Service (competitor Q of S) results are not required.
Document: 1306615.doc - 70KO
2009-05-27 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: SaskTel has received the reply comments of MTS Allstream
dated 22 May 2009 regarding the Provisioning of Competitor Digital Network
( CDN ) services in Accordance with Competitor Quality of Service Standards
Document: 1157414.doc
- 70KO
2009-05-22 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of comments from Bell Aliant
Regional Communications and Bell Canada (the Companies), MTS Allstream
and Saskatchewan Telecommunications dated May 12, 2009 in relation to
the abovenoted application.
Document: 1148723.pdf
- 46KO
2009-05-22 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications and Bell Canada
(collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of comments dated 12 May
2009 from MTS Allstream Inc.; Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel);
and TELUS Communications Company regarding a proceeding initiated by
Commission staff on 27 April 2009.
Document: 1148209.zip
- 40KO
2009-05-22 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: The attached reply comments are being submitted by Saskatchewan
Telecommunications (SaskTel) pursuant to the procedure established with
respect to the above noted applications by Commission letter dated 27
April 2009
Document: 1148195.zip
- 55KO
2009-05-22 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream herein provides reply comments concerning
provisioning of Competitor Digital Network (CDN) services in accordance
with Competitor Quality of Service (CQoS) standards.
Document: 1148120.pdf
- 88KO
2009-05-12 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: As requested by the Commission, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS
Allstream) herein provides comments concerning provisioning of Competitor
Digital Network (CDN) services in accordance with Competitor Quality
of Service (CQoS) standards, specifically MTS Allstream’s Part
VII application on this matter, as well as concerning a definition of
a “no facilities available” situation that is consistent
with the Commission’s findings in paragraph 59 of Decision 2006-341.
Document: 1125032.pdf
- 86KO
2009-05-12 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt a Commission letter dated April 27, 2009, in which Commission staff re-opened the MTS Allstream Part VII Application concerning the provisioning of competitor digital network services in accordance with the competitor quality of service (“CQoS”) standards, dated December 18, 2008 (the “Application”).
Document: 1125024.pdf - 54KO
2009-05-12 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) hereby submits the following
comments on the Part VII application filed by MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS
Allstream) on 18 December 2008.
Document: 1125020.zip - 46KO
2009-05-12 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of Commission
staff correspondence dated 27 April 2009 initiating a proceeding
examining the issues pertaining to a Part VII application originally
submitted by MTS Allstream on 18 December 2008 and also seeking
parties' proposals for a "clear definition" of what constitutes
a no facilities situation with respect to the provision of CDN services
by the ILECs.
Document: 1125010.zip
- 50KO
2009-04-27 - Lettre
du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à la Liste de distribution
- Objet: Le Conseil rouvre l'instance amorcée par la demande
présentée en vertu de la partie VII par MTS Allstream,
datée du 18 décembre 2008; il invite les parties à
soumettre leurs observations sur les points énoncés au
paragraphe 10 et fixe les délais de l'instance
2009-04-22 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In a letter dated February 11, 2009, TELUS requested that Commission re-open the proceeding initiated by MTS Allstream's application in order to allow interested parties to comment on the substantive part of the Application, and in particular, the applicability of the no facilities exception to CQoS Indicator 1.19 - Requested Due Dates Met - CDN Services.
Document: 1091554.zip - 53KO
2009-03-19 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is in receipt of a Commission Staff letter dated 18 February 2009.
Document: 1045219.pdf - 29KO
2009-03-19 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. is in receipt of two letters issued by TELUS Communications Corp. on 9 March 2009 regarding provisioning of CDN servcies in accordance with existing Competitor Quality of Service standars.
Document: 1045013.pdf - 78KO
2009-03-09 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company is in receipt of a letter issued on February 18, 2009, by Commission staff in response to TELUS's letter dated February 11, 2009 where TELUS had requested that the Commission staff re-open the proceeding initiated by MTS Allstream's Part VII Application.
Document: 1038921.pdf - 36KO
2009-02-18 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Description: Lettre adressée à la Liste de distribution - Objet: Lettre datée du 11 février 2009 de la Société TELUS Communications liée à
une lettre du Conseil concernant MTS Allstream Inc. demande en vertu de la Partie VII concernant l'approvionnement des services de réseau numérique propres aux concurrents
2009-02-11 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company is in receipt of a letter issued on January 15, 2009, by Commission staff that closed an Application filed by MTS Allstream pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure on December 18, 2008.
Document: 1023042.pdf - 55KO
2009-02-10 - Télébec, Société en commandite
Description: Le 15 janvier 2009, le Conseil expédiait une lettre concernant la fourniture de services de réseau numérique propre aux concurrents.
Document: 1021829.pdf - 76KO
2009-01-15 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à la Liste de distribution - Objet: MTS Allstream Inc. - Demande en vertu de la Partie VII concernant l'approvionnement des services de réseau numérique propres aux concurrents conformément aux normes de qualité de services aux concurrents
2008-12-22 - Lettre du Conseil
Dossier #: 8662-M59-200817033 - 8660-M59-200816994
Description: Lettre adressée à la Liste de distribution - Objet: MTS Allstream Inc. - Demande de révision et de modification de la décision de télécom 2008-57 (services Centrex), et MTS Allstream Inc. - Demande concernant l’approvisionnement des services de réseau numérique propres aux concurrents conformément aux normes de qualité du service aux concurrents
2008-12-18 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In light of extremely excessive claims of "no facilities" by ILECs, MTS Allstream requests that the Commission direc ILECs to provision Competitor Digital Network (CDN) Services in accordance with Competitor Quality of Service standards in situation where provisioning requires only routine activities which are completely withint the control of the ILEC, consistent with the findings of the Commission in Decision 2006-34, 26 May 2006.
Document: 994940.pdf - 312KO
Mise à jour : 2009-10-27
- Date de modification :