2008-12-18 - #: 8660-M59-200816994 - MTS Allstream Inc. - Application concerning provisioning of competitor digital network services in accordance with competitor quality of service standards
File using the On-line Services
2009-10-23 - Telecom decision CRTC 2009-664 CISC Business Process Working Group – Non-consensus report BPRE069a regarding the competitor digital network DS-1 service process
File numbers: 8621-C12-01/08 and 8660-M59-200816994
2009-08-21 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2009-514 MTS Allstream Inc. – Application concerning provisioning of competitor digital network services in accordance with competitor quality of service standards
File number: 8660-M59-200816994
2009-10- 22 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out at paragraph 31 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2009-514, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) hereby provides comment as to why revised competitor Quality of Service (competitor Q of S) results are not required.
Document: 1306615.doc - 70KB
2009-05-27 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: SaskTel has received the reply comments of MTS Allstream
dated 22 May 2009 regarding the Provisioning of Competitor Digital Network
( CDN ) services in Accordance with Competitor Quality of Service Standards
Document: 1157414.doc
- 70KB
2009-05-22 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of comments from Bell Aliant
Regional Communications and Bell Canada (the Companies), MTS Allstream
and Saskatchewan Telecommunications dated May 12, 2009 in relation to
the abovenoted application.
Document: 1148723.pdf
- 46KB
2009-05-22 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications and Bell Canada
(collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of comments dated 12 May
2009 from MTS Allstream Inc.; Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel);
and TELUS Communications Company regarding a proceeding initiated by
Commission staff on 27 April 2009.
Document: 1148209.zip
- 40KB
2009-05-22 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: The attached reply comments are being submitted by Saskatchewan
Telecommunications (SaskTel) pursuant to the procedure established with
respect to the above noted applications by Commission letter dated 27
April 2009
Document: 1148195.zip
- 55KB
2009-05-22 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream herein provides reply comments concerning
provisioning of Competitor Digital Network (CDN) services in accordance
with Competitor Quality of Service (CQoS) standards.
Document: 1148120.pdf
- 88KB
2009-05-12 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: As requested by the Commission, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS
Allstream) herein provides comments concerning provisioning of Competitor
Digital Network (CDN) services in accordance with Competitor Quality
of Service (CQoS) standards, specifically MTS Allstream’s Part
VII application on this matter, as well as concerning a definition of
a “no facilities available” situation that is consistent
with the Commission’s findings in paragraph 59 of Decision 2006-341.
Document: 1125032.pdf
- 86KB
2009-05-12 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt a Commission letter dated April 27, 2009, in which Commission staff re-opened the MTS Allstream Part VII Application concerning the provisioning of competitor digital network services in accordance with the competitor quality of service (“CQoS”) standards, dated December 18, 2008 (the “Application”).
Document: 1125024.pdf - 54KB
2009-05-12 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) hereby submits the following
comments on the Part VII application filed by MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS
Allstream) on 18 December 2008.
Document: 1125020.zip - 46KB
2009-05-12 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of Commission
staff correspondence dated 27 April 2009 initiating a proceeding
examining the issues pertaining to a Part VII application originally
submitted by MTS Allstream on 18 December 2008 and also seeking
parties' proposals for a "clear definition" of what constitutes
a no facilities situation with respect to the provision of CDN services
by the ILECs.
Document: 1125010.zip
- 50KB
2009-04-27 - Commission
Letter
Description: Letter addressed to the Distribution List - Re: The Commission
is re-opening the proceeding initiated by MTS Allstream's Part
VII application dated 18 December 2008, inviting parties to provide
comments on issues set out in paragraph 10 and setting timeframes for
the proceeding
2009-04-22 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In a letter dated February 11, 2009, TELUS requested that Commission re-open the proceeding initiated by MTS Allstream's application in order to allow interested parties to comment on the substantive part of the Application, and in particular, the applicability of the no facilities exception to CQoS Indicator 1.19 - Requested Due Dates Met - CDN Services.
Document: 1091554.zip - 53KB
2009-03-19 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is in receipt of a Commission Staff letter dated 18 February 2009.
Document: 1045219.pdf - 29KB
2009-03-19 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. is in receipt of two letters issued by TELUS Communications Corp. on 9 March 2009 regarding provisioning of CDN servcies in accordance with existing Competitor Quality of Service standars.
Document: 1045013.pdf - 78KB
2009-03-09 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company is in receipt of a letter issued on February 18, 2009, by Commission staff in response to TELUS's letter dated February 11, 2009 where TELUS had requested that the Commission staff re-open the proceeding initiated by MTS Allstream's Part VII Application.
Document: 1038921.pdf - 36KB
2009-02-18 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to the Distribution List - Re: TELUS Communications Company letter dated 11 February 2009 regarding the Commission staff letter related to MTS Allstream Inc.’s Part VII Application on the provisioning of competitor digital network services
2009-02-11 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company is in receipt of a letter issued on January 15, 2009, by Commission staff that closed an Application filed by MTS Allstream pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure on December 18, 2008.
Document: 1023042.pdf - 55KB
2009-02-10 - Télébec, Société en commandite
Description: Le 15 janvier 2009, le Conseil expédiait une lettre concernant la fourniture de services de réseau numérique propre aux concurrents.
Document: 1021829.pdf - 76KB
2009-01-15 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to the Distribution List - Re: MTS Allstream Inc. - Part VII application concerning the provisioning of competitor digital network services in accordance with competitor quality of service standards
2008-12-22 - Commission Letter
File #: 8662-M59-200817033 - 8660-M59-200816994
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: MTS Allstream Inc. - Application to review and vary Telecom Decision 2008-57 (Centrex services) and MTS Allstream Inc. - Application concerning provisioning of competitor digital network services in accordance with competitor quality of service standards
2008-12-18 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In light of extremely excessive claims of "no facilities" by ILECs, MTS Allstream requests that the Commission direc ILECs to provision Competitor Digital Network (CDN) Services in accordance with Competitor Quality of Service standards in situation where provisioning requires only routine activities which are completely withint the control of the ILEC, consistent with the findings of the Commission in Decision 2006-34, 26 May 2006.
Document: 994940.pdf - 312KB
- Date modified: