2004-08-06 - #: 8662-C131-200408543 - Canadian Marketing Association (CMA) - Application to review and vary Decision 2004-35

2007-07-19 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-48-1 - The Commission is issuing corrections to paragraphs 91 and 94 of the English version of Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules framework and the National Do Not Call List , Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-48, 3 July 2007. Reference: 8665-C12-200601626, 8662-C131-200408543, 8662-F20-200409814, 8662-B48-200409228, 8662-A84-200410035.

2007-07-03 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-48 Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules framework and the National Do Not Call List. Reference: 8665-C12-200601626, 8662-C131-200408543, 8662-F20-200409814, 8662-B48-200409228 and 8662-A84-200410035.

2006-03-13 - Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-4-1 The Commission revises the timeline for written comments in Proceeding to establish a national do not call list framework and to review the telemarketing rules , Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-4, 20 February 2006. Reference: 8665-C12-200601626, 8662-C131-200408543, 8662-F20-200409814, 8662-B48-200409228, 8662-A84-200410035.

2006-02-20 - Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-4 The Commission initiates a public proceeding, including a public consultation, in relation to the creation and operation of a national do not call list (national DNCL) as well as the establishment and enforcement of national DNCL rules and any other rules related to telemarketing. Reference: 8665-C12-200601626, 8662-C131-200408543, 8662-F20-200409814, 8662-B48-200409228, 8662-A84-200410035.

2004-09-28 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-63 The Commission approves, with one exception, the Canadian Marketing Association's (CMA's) application to stay Review of telemarketing rules, Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-35, 21 May 2004, pending the disposition of the CMA's application to review and vary that Decision. The stay applies to all requirements set out in Decision 2004-35 except the requirement that telecommunications service providers track and report complaint statistics; this requirement becomes effective 1 January 2005. Reference: 8662-C131-200408543. [.pdf]


2004-09-29 - Commission Letter
File #: 8662-C131-200408543 - 8662-F20-200409814 - 8662-B48-200409228 - 8662-A84-200410035
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Applications pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure to review and vary Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-35 - Review of telemarketing rules, 21 May 2004

2004-09-17 - Johnston & Buchan on behalf of Canadian Marketing Association (CMA)
Description: This reply argument is filed on behalf of the Canadian Marketing Association (the “CMA”) and responds to the answers that were filed by interested parties in respect of the CMA's August 6, 2004 application requesting that the Commission review and vary Telecom Decision 2004-35, Review of Telemarketing Rules
Document: 040917.doc - 351KB

2004-09-07 - Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Description: Call-Net Enterprises Inc. (Call-Net) is in receipt of the Commission’s letter dated 18 August 2004, directing interested parties to file their Answer regarding the above noted subject.
Document: 040907.doc - 51KB

2004-09-07 - Action Réseau Consommateur and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The following comments are submitted on behalf of Action Réseau Consommateur[1] and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (ARC/PIAC) in response to the above-noted application. ARC and PIAC take this further opportunity to comment on CRTC Telecom Decision 2004-35 (CRTC 2004-35) and the existing and future telemarketing regulatory regime in Canada.
Document: 040907.doc - 161KB

2004-09-07 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: RCI fully supports CMA's application and the relief requested therein.
Document: 040907.pdf - 200KB

2004-09-07 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: This letter constitutes TELUS’ Answer to the CMA’s application to review and vary various determinations and directions set out in Decision 2004-35.
Document: 040907.doc - 90KB

2004-09-07 - Canadian Bankers Association
Description: The Canadian Bankers' Association is pleased to submit comments in reference to the aforementioned Part VII application.
Document: 040907.zip - 166KB

2004-09-07 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited Partnership, Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter of 18 August 2004, the Companies submit this Answer to the application to review and vary Decision 2004-35, Review of Telemarketing Rules, filed by the Canadian Marketing Association (the CMA) on 6 August 2004.
Document: 040907.doc - 136KB

2004-09-07 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commision's letter, Primus hereby files its Answer.
Document: 040907.doc - 72KB

2004-09-02 - Johnston & Buchan on behalf of Canadian Marketing Association (CMA)
Description: This constitutes the reply argument of the Canadian Marketing Association (“CMA”) to the comments of interested parties made in respect of the CMA's August 6, 2004 application which sought the review and variance of Telecom Decision 2004-35, Review of Telemarketing Rules (Decision 2004-35).
Document: 040902.doc - 327KB

2004-08-31 - Canadian Bankers Association
Description: The CBA hereby requests that the Commission accord the association 'Interested Party' status in the Part VII Review and Variance proceeding.
Document: 040831.pdf - 1261KB

2004-08-31 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited Partnership, Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter of 18 August 2004, the Companies submit this Answer to the request for a stay of Decision 2004-35, Review of Telemarketing Rules, filed by the Canadian Marketing Association (the CMA) on 6 August 2004.
Document: 040831.doc - 92KB

2004-08-31 - Action Réseau Consommateur and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The following comments are submitted on behalf of Action Réseau Consommateur and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (ARC/PIAC) in response to the above-noted application by the Canadian Marketing Association (CMA) to stay CRTC Telecom Decision 2004-35 (CRTC 2004-35) regarding telemarketing.
Document: 040831.doc - 140KB

2004-08-31 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission’s letter, Primus hereby files its Answer.
Document: 040831.doc - 73KB

2004-08-31 - Eastlink
Description: EastLink supports CMA's request to suspend implementation of Decision 2004-35 pending the outcome of the review and vary application.
Document: 040831.doc - 166KB

2004-08-31 - Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Description: Call-Net's Comments on the CMA's Request to Stay the Application of Telecom Decision 2004-35.
Document: 040831.doc - 42KB

2004-08-31 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: RCI fully supports CMA's request for an interim stay of Decision 2004-35.
Document: 040831.pdf - 120KB

2004-08-30 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: This letter constitutes TELUS’ Answer to the CMA’s application for a stay of Decision 2004-35.
Document: 040830.doc - 56KB

2004-08-18 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Interested Parties to PN 2001-34 - Re: Canadian Marketing Association's Application to Review and Vary Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-35, Review of Telemarketing Rules, dated 21 May 2004 - Proceeding

2004-08-06 - Johnston & Buchan on behalf of Canadian Marketing Association (CMA)
Description: This application is filed on behalf of the Canadian Marketing Association (CMA) pursuant to section 62 of the Telecommunications Act and Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure
Document: 040806.zip - 358KB

"List of comments by alphabetical order"

ACE INA Insurance / ACE INA Life Insurance, Carol Graham
ACI Telecentrics Incorporated, Gale Hodney
Art Gallery of Ontario, Shaw St. Michael
Association of Fundraising Professionals (AFP), Walter Sczudlo
Beautyrock Inc., Robert A. Furlonger
Canada Life, Doug Rattray
Canada Post Corporation, Stewart Bacon
Canada Post Corporation, Stewart Bacon
Canadian Association of Financial Institutions in Insurance (CAFII), Cathy Honor
Canadian Cancer Society, Catherine Sherrard
Canadian Customer Contact Centre Council, Darlene Berscht
Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association Inc., G.R. Traversy
Canadian Magazine Publishers Association, Mark Jamison
Coalition for Competitive Telecommunication Pricing, Ian Russell
Direct Energy, Jim McInnis
Doubleday Canada Limited, Nazir Alibhai
Great-West Life Assurance/London Life Insurance Company/Canada Life
Assurance Company, Judy Alaszkiewicz

Independent Financial Brokers (IFB), John Whaley
Investments Dealers Association of Canada, Joseph J. Oliver
S.M.T. Direct Marketing Inc., Tony E. Nadra
The Canadian Lung Association, R. Ross Reid
The Hamilton Spectator, G. Myers
The Loyalty Group, Caroline Papadatos
TigerTel/UTR, Sue Coetzee
Toronto Star, Kevin Brewin
Transcontinental Media, Terri DeRose
Ultramatic Sleep of Canada Inc., Ron Patterson
World Vision Canada, Dennis J. Ivancic

Date modified: