2010-06-29 - #: 8661-B54-201010636 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership et Bell Canada - Demande concernant l’application des frais de multiplexage liés aux services de réseau numérique propres aux concurrents dans le cas des sociétés affiliées des concurrents
Déposer en utilisant les services en ligne
2010-11-23 - Décision de télécom CRTC - 2010-867 Bell Aliant Communications régionales, société en commandite, et Bell Canada – Demande concernant le tarif à appliquer aux sociétés affiliées des concurrents à l’égard du service de multiplexage de central des compagnies Bell
Numéro de dossier : 8661-B54-201010636
2010-08-10 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Rogers Communications Partnership (formerly Rogers Communications Inc. and referred to herein as “Rogers”) is in receipt of the Reply comments dated August 09 2010 from Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, “Bell”) with respect to the Application noted above. In the Reply Bell raised new arguments and introduced new evidence which were not made in its original Application. Rogers is filing the following brief comments to address Bell’s new evidence and new argument.
Document: 1425494.pdf - 79KO
2010-08-09 - Lettre du Conseil
Description: Lettre adressée à Bell Aliant Communications régionales, société en commandite et Bell Canada - Objet : Demande en vertu de la partie VII concernant l’application des frais de multiplexage liés aux services de réseau numérique propres aux concurrents dans le cas des sociétés affiliées des concurrents
2010-08-09 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description:
Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of comments dated 29 July 2010 from Rogers Communications Partnership (hereafter referred to as Rogers) regarding an Application submitted by the Companies on 29 June 2010 in which the Companies request that the Commission confirm that affiliates of competitors, where the competitor is co-located in an Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier's (ILEC's) Central Office (CO), are appropriately billed for channelization of Competitor Digital Network (CDN) access circuits terminating in that CO at retail rates, pursuant to paragraph 156 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-6, Competitor Digital Network Services, dated 3 February 2005. The attached constitutes the Companies’ Reply.
Document: 1424911.zip - 62KO
2010-07-29 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Rogers Communications Partnership (formerly Rogers Communications Inc. and referred to herein as Rogers) is in receipt of the Application dated June 29 2010 from Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, Bell), pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure.
Document: 1422181.pdf - 76KO
2010-06-29 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) submit this application, pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, to request that the Commission confirm that affiliates of competitors, where the competitor is co-located in an Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier's (ILEC's) Central Office (CO), are appropriately billed for channelization of Competitor Digital Network (CDN) access circuits terminating in that CO at retail rates , pursuant to paragraph 156 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-6, Competitor Digital Network Services (Decision 2005-6), dated 3 February 2005.
Description:
Document: 1412039.zip - 54KO
Mise à jour : 2010-11-23
- Date de modification :