Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada: 8663-B54-201109893

Application to Reclassify Ethernet Access Services (EAS) Offered in Ontario and Québec from Retail to Wholesale Service - 2011-06-23


2012-09-27 - Telecom decision CRTC 2012-520 Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership / Bell Canada and MTS Allstream Inc. ‒ Applications regarding Ethernet services
File numbers: 8663-B54-201109893 and 8661-M59-201115403


Comments

Replies

2012-06-18 - AT&T Global Services Canada Co.
Description: Set out below please find the response of AT&T Global Services Canada Co. to the Request for Information from the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission dated May 8, 2012 regarding Ethernet Services and related matters.
Document: 1730443.pdf - 73KB

2012-05-28 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) wishes to inform the Commission that, in its response to the interrogatories posed by Commission staff in a letter dated 8 May 2012, an inappropriate version of the SaskTel response to SASKTEL(CRTC)8MAY12-201 ETHERNET SERVICES was included.  SaskTel wishes to withdraw that document and file the correct SaskTel response, which is attached to this filing.
Document: 1722588.zip - 64KB

2012-05-25 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Pursuant to the Commission letters dates May 8th and 17th, Vaxination Informatique presents its short additional comments on the above 2 files.
Document: 1722769.pdf - 572KB

2012-05-25 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited Partnership and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out by the Commission in its letters dated 8 May 2012 and 17 May 2012, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited Partnership and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are attaching their responses to the Commission's requests for information.
Document: 1722744.zip - 276KB

2012-05-25 - O.N.Tel Inc. carrying on business as Ontera
Description: O.N.Tel Inc. carrying on business as Ontera (“Ontera”) is in receipt of interrogatory number 101 from the Commission dated 8 May 2012 related to prior Part 1 applications filed by Bell Canada on 23 June 2011 and MTS Allstream Inc. filed on 11 November 2011.
Document: 1722731.zip - 307KB

2012-05-25 - Northwestel
Description: On May 8, 2012, the CRTC issued an interrogatory to Northwestel on the above noted matter. Attached is the Company’s response.
Document: 1722717.zip - 47KB

2012-05-25 - MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc. (collectively MTS Allstream) are hereby providing responses to the requests for information received in a Commission staff letter dated 8 May 2012 with regards to Ethernet Services and related matters.
Document: 1722666.zip - 279KB

2012-05-25 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff 17 May 2012 letter, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby submits the attached responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC.
Document: 1722545.zip - 112KB

2012-05-25 - Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB)
Description: I am writing on behalf of the 109,000 small- and medium-sized business owners who are members of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB), to support MTS Allstream’s application for reclassification of wholesale Ethernet services and ancillary relief, as well as the extension of the phase out period to 2014.
Document: 1722209.pdf - 72KB

2012-05-25 - British Columbia Broadband Association
Description: The BC Broadband Association is in receipt of a letter from the Commission dated 8 May 2012 regarding request for information on applications regarding Ethernet Services and related matters.
Document: 1722133.pdf - 455KB

2012-05-25 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: In accordance with the Commission’s letter of 17 May 2012, please find attached herein the answers of Rogers Communications Partnership (Rogers) to the Commission’s requests for information (RFIs) in the above-noted matter.
Document: 1721513.zip - 76KB

2012-05-25 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) hereby provides its response to the interrogatories posed by Commission staff in a letter dated 8 May 2012.
Document: 1721494.zip - 79KB

2012-05-25 - Verizon Canada Ltd.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letters in the above-captioned proceeding, dated May 8, 2012 and May 17, 2012, please find attached the response of Verizon Canada Ltd. to the following request for information from the Commission: Verizon Canada(CRTC)8May12-101.
Document: 1721457.zip - 109KB

2012-05-25 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of a Commission staff request for information dated 8 May 2012. Pursuant to the revised process set out in the Commission staff letter dated 17 May 2012, Primus is hereby filing its response.
Document: 1721442.zip - 217KB

2012-05-25 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Distributel Communications Limited (“Distributel”) is in receipt of the Commission request for Information letter dated May 8, 2012 with respect to the above proceedings and hereby submits the response of Distributel to (CRTC) 08May12-202.
Document: 1721432.zip - 30KB

2012-05-25 - Shaw Telecom G.P.
Description: Shaw Telecom G.P. (Shaw) is in receipt of an interrogatory from the Commission dated 8 May 2012 related to wholesale and retail Ethernet Services in relation to a Part 1 application filed by Bell Canada on 23 June 2011 and a Part 1application filed by MTS Allstream Inc. filed on 11 November 2011.
Document: 1721403.zip - 139KB

2012-05-25 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of two different letters from the CRTC, both dated 8 May 2012, wherein the Commission asks for responses to certain requests for information as set out in three interrogatory questions related to the above noted Commission files. In accordance with the amended date for filing responses as per the staff process letter dated May 17, 2012, TELUS files its attached responses to the interrogatories for this proceeding.
Document: 1721383.zip - 205KB

2012-05-25 - Navigata Communications 2009
Description: In the following, Navigata Communications 2009 (Navigata) provides its response to your 8 May 2012 request for information. Specifically, we are providing revenues derived from Navigata’s Ethernet services; to the extent the information is available.
Document: 1721369.pdf - 264KB

2012-05-25 - Québecor Média inc. au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron s.e.n.c.
Description: Conformément aux directives du Conseil énoncées dans sa lettre datée du 17 mai 2012, Québecor Média inc. (Québecor Média), au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron s.e.n.c. (Vidéotron), soumet par la présente ses réponses à des demandes de renseignements.
Document: 1721352.zip - 142KB

2012-05-25 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (CNOC)
Description: In accordance with the Commission’s letters dated 8 May 2012 and 17 May 2012, Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is hereby filing its response to the information request posed to CNOC by the Commission.
Document: 1721346.zip - 21KB

2012-05-23 - Radianz Americas Inc.
Description: Responses to requests for information.
Document: 1722053.pdf - 46KB

2012-05-17 - Commission Procedural Letter
File #: 8663-B54-201109893 - 8661-M59-201115403
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Applications regarding Ethernet Services and related matters – Request for extension and modification of the procedures

2012-05-16 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt of a letter dated May 16, 2012, filed by Cogeco Cable Inc. (“Cogeco”) in relation interrogatories issued by Commission staff on May 8, 2012 for the above-noted applications. TELUS was a recipient of the interrogatories posed.
Document: 1718569.pdf - 76KB

2012-05-16 - Shaw Telecom G.P.
Description: Shaw Telecom G.P. (Shaw) is in receipt of a letter dated 16 May 2012 from Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) requesting an extension to the deadline for filing interrogatory responses and a modification to procedure in the above reference matter.
Document: 1718560.pdf - 53KB

2012-05-16 - Cogeco Cable inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable inc. (Cogeco) is in receipt of an interrogatory, dated 8 May 2012, from the Commission in the above-noted proceeding. Pursuant to the CRTC directive, the response to this interrogatory must be filed by 18 May 2012.
Document: 1718552.pdf - 81KB

2012-05-11 - MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc. (collectively, MTS Allstream) is in receipt of two Commission letters issued 8 May 2012 regarding Ethernet Services and related matters.  MTS Allstream thanks the Commission for its attention to this very important file.  MTS Allstream believes these two proceedings are of critical importance to the future of a competitive and innovative digital economy in Canada.
Document: 1716896.pdf - 129KB

2012-05-08 - Commission Procedural Letter
File #: 8663-B54-201109893 - 8661-M59-201115403
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Applications regarding Ethernet Services and related matters – Requests for information

2012-05-08 - Commission Procedural Letter
File #: 8663-B54-201109893 - 8661-M59-201115403
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Applications regarding Ethernet Services and related matters – Requests for information

2011-06-23 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada
Description: Pursuant to Part 1 of the CRTC Rules of Practice and Procedure, attached is the Companies' Application to reclassify their EAS offered in their Ontario and Québec serving areas from a retail service to a wholesale service.  This Application is being made pursuant to the Commission’s determination in Telecom Decision CRTC 2008-17, Revised regulatory framework for wholesale services and definition of essential service, which classified Ethernet services as non-essential and placed them on a path to forbearance in 2013.
Document: 1583713.zip - 59KB

Date modified: