ARCHIVÉ - Transcription - Winnipeg, Manitoba - 2002-02-06
Cette page Web a été archivée dans le Web
L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous.
Offrir un contenu dans les deux langues officielles
Prière de noter que la Loi sur les langues officielles exige que toutes publications gouvernementales soient disponibles dans les deux langues officielles.
Afin de rencontrer certaines des exigences de cette loi, les procès-verbaux du Conseil seront dorénavant bilingues en ce qui a trait à la page couverture, la liste des membres et du personnel du CRTC participant à l'audience et la table des matières.
Toutefois, la publication susmentionnée est un compte rendu textuel des délibérations et, en tant que tel, est transcrite dans l'une ou l'autre des deux langues officielles, compte tenu de la langue utilisée par le participant à l'audience.
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
FOR THE CANADIAN RADIO‑TELEVISION AND
TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
TRANSCRIPTION DES AUDIENCES DU
CONSEIL DE LA RADIODIFFUSION
ET DES TÉLÉCOMMUNICATIONS CANADIENNES
SUBJECT / SUJET:
Multiple broadcasting applications &
BROADCASTING applications further to Public Notice 2001-79 "Call for
applications for a broadcasting licence TO CARRY ON A RADIO PROGRAMMING
UNDERTAKING TO SERVE WINNIPEG, MANITOBA".
MULTIPLES DEMANDES EN RADIOdiFFUSION ET
DEMANDES EN radiodiffusion suite à l'avis public CRTC 2001-79 "APPEL DE DEMANDES DE
LICENCE DE RADIODIFFUSION VISANT L'EXPLOITATION D'UNE ENTREPRISE DE
PROGRAMMATION DE RADIO POUR DESSERVIR WINNIPEG (MANITOBA)".
HELD
AT: TENUE
À:
Winnipeg
Convention Centre Winnipeg
Convention Centre
PanAm
Room Salle
PanAm
375
York Avenue 375,
avenue York
Winnipeg,
Manitoba Winnipeg
(Manitoba)
6 February, 2002 le
6 février 2002
Volume 3
Transcripts
In
order to meet the requirements of the Official Languages
Act,
transcripts of proceedings before the Commission will be
bilingual
as to their covers, the listing of the CRTC members
and
staff attending the public hearings, and the Table of
Contents.
However,
the aforementioned publication is the recorded
verbatim
transcript and, as such, is taped and transcribed in
either
of the official languages, depending on the language
spoken
by the participant at the public hearing.
Transcription
Afin de rencontrer les exigences de la Loi sur les
langues
officielles, les procès‑verbaux pour le Conseil
seront
bilingues en ce qui a trait à la page couverture, la
liste des
membres et du personnel du CRTC participant à
l'audience
publique ainsi que la table des matières.
Toutefois, la publication susmentionnée est un compte
rendu
textuel des délibérations et, en tant que tel, est
enregistrée
et transcrite dans l'une ou l'autre des deux langues
officielles, compte tenu de la langue utilisée par le
participant à l'audience publique.
Canadian
Radio‑television and
Telecommunications Commission
Conseil de la radiodiffusion et des
télécommunications canadiennes
Transcript / Transcription
Multiple broadcasting applications &
BROADCASTING applications further to Public Notice 2001-79 "Call for
applications for a broadcasting licence TO CARRY ON A RADIO PROGRAMMING
UNDERTAKING TO SERVE WINNIPEG, MANITOBA".
MULTIPLES DEMANDES EN RADIODIFFUSION ET
DEMANDES EN radiodiffusion suite à l'avis public CRTC 2001-79 "APPEL DE DEMANDES DE
LICENCE DE RADIODIFFUSION VISANT L'EXPLOITATION D'UNE ENTREPRISE DE
PROGRAMMATION DE RADIO POUR DESSERVIR WINNIPEG (MANITOBA)".
BEFORE / DEVANT:
Barbara Cram Regional Commissioner for Manitoba and Saskatchewan
/
Conseillère
régionale pour le Manitoba et le Saskatchewan
Ronald
Williams Commissioner
/ Conseiller
Andrew
Cardozo Commissioner
/ Conseiller
ALSO
PRESENT / AUSSI PRÉSENTS:
Joe
Aguiar Hearing
Manager / Gérant de
l'audience
Gary
Krushen Secretary
/ secrétaire
Peter
McCallum Legal
Counsel /
conseiller
juridique
HELD
AT: TENUE
À:
Winnipeg
Convention Centre Winnipeg Convention
Centre
PanAm
Room Salle PanAm
375
York Avenue 375,
avenue York
Winnipeg,
Manitoba Winnipeg
(Manitoba)
6 February, 2002 le
6 février 2002
Volume 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS / TABLE DES MATIÈRES
PARA NO.
PHASE
II
APPLICATION
BY / APPLICATION PAR
Rogers Broadcasting Limited 2156
Corus Radio Company
2170
Global Communications Ltd. 2191
N.I.B. 95.5 Cable FM Inc. 2206
CKVN Radiolink System Inc. 2230
HIS Broadcasting Inc. 2243
Red River College Radio
2246
PHASE
III
INTERVENTION BY / INTERVENTION PAR
Frank Liebzeit
2255
Richard Gillis
2298
Jazz Lynx, Jan and Ted Hasiuk 2331
Walle Larsson
2359
David McLeod
2396
David Angus
2457
Ron Paley
2487
Karen Oliver
2521
David Sherman
2548
Ken Webb
2569
Robyn Osmond
2589
PHASE IV
REPLY BY / RÉPLIQUE PAR
Red River College Radio
2601
HIS Broadcasting Inc.
2605
CKVN Radiolink System Inc. 2613
N.I.B. 95.5 Cable FM Inc. 2618
Global Communications Limited
2629
Corus Radio Company 2646
Rogers Broadcasting Limited 553
/ 2657
PHASE I
APPLICATION BY / APPLICATION PAR
Trinity Television Inc. 555
/ 2665
Winnipeg,
Manitoba /
Winnipeg,
Manitoba
--- Upon resuming on Wednesday, February 6, 2002, at
0832 / L'audience reprend le mardi 5 février 2002 à 0832
2154
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Phase II, Mr. Secretary.
2155
THE
SECRETARY: Thank you, Madam Chair. The first item in Phase II will be Rogers
Broadcasting Limited. Please commence
when you're ready.
2156
MR. MILES: Thank you.
Madam Chair, members of the Commission.
Phase II of the proceedings, we do not intend to intervene against any
other applicant. However, with your
permission our comments will be limited to providing additional information or
clarification with regards to the information required by the Commission during
our formal application.
2157
There were
three areas. Our comments will focus on
the ability for our Canadian Talent Development commitment to go directly to
Winnipeg or Manitoba-based artists.
Two, the depreciation amount in year two of our financial projections
for the conversion of CKY-AM to an FM.
And three, further details regarding the availability of FM frequencies
in the Winnipeg market.
2158
First, I will
comment on the Canadian FACTOR development.
We have a letter which we will file with the Commission from Ms. Heather
Ostertag saying that the incremental $4,000 annually will be applied to
Manitoba artists as per our request.
Further to that, if you'll allow me half a second ‑‑
first of all I'd like to apologize for the oversight, because we'd normally try
to do that. However, we have not wanted
to hamper FACTOR in their ability to distribute it.
2159
It may well be
the time, and I'm going to ask our representative on the FACTOR Board to take a
look into saying where FACTOR may have the resources now to actually start
providing more regional coverage on the thing.
I think they've tried to do it as a matter of fact, but with your
permission we'll keep the Commission informed on that and we'll have our board
Member, Mr. Harvey Glad, bring it up at the next FACTOR board.
2160
Now, Sandra
Stasiuk will comment on the depreciation.
2161
MS.
STASIUK: The increase in year two of
the depreciation for CKY was a result of writing off the current transmitter
equipment that will be replaced with the new FM equipment.
2162
MR. MILES: And third, with further details regarding
the availability of the FM frequencies, Madam Chair, we at Rogers have always
been proud of our technical expertise.
We have Steve Edwards. We've
always been willing to share over the last number of hearings this information
and have done so quite willingly with all the rest of the participants,
particularly for those going after higher power frequencies.
2163
Steve Edwards
has been ably assisted by Wayne Stacey in this particular regard. And we had a more detailed bunch of
information with regards to the frequencies and all the rest of it that Steve
had addressed that we were to, with your permission, file and will do so again
at the conclusion of this part.
2164
But one of the
comments made by Global during their presentation was at odds with some of the
material that we had, so we went back again after that presentation, after
supplying the material we had to Global as well as to Corus, had Wayne Stacey
and Steve Edwards take another look at it.
It has resulted in some minor changes to the information that we were
going to file and Steve is going to comment on it now, with your permission.
2165
MR.
EDWARDS: Good morning. Yes, I checked with Wayne following Jim
Moltner's presentation, and as it turned out, Wayne had relied on incorrect
data with respect to the power for CBWT and Jim is quite correct that the
maximum power that could be used with channel 204 at the Starbuck site is 54
kilowatts. That would result in a
reduction of the radius of the .5 millivolt contour by about six kilometres,
from 79.6 to 73.4, and would reduce the population within the .5 millivolt by 3
percent.
2166
So as I
mentioned to you, it's surprising how little difference a change in power like
that would make but there is a difference and I apologize for the previous
error.
2167
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. Miles.
2168
MR. MILES: Thank you.
2169
THE
SECRETARY: Thank you, Madam Chair. I now call Corus Radio Company for Phase II.
2170
MS.
McNAIR: Good morning. First, I'll introduce a new addition to our
panel, Jack Hepner, who is the engineer at Corus Radio in Winnipeg, Garth
Buchko and Kathleen McNair, myself.
2171
We, like
Rogers, are not intervening against any other applicant in this phase but are
here to respond to three questions that were raised.
2172
First we were
asked what rotation would cuts from the CD compilation receive. Secondly we were asked to report on our
staffing levels in Edmonton and Toronto, where we also operate two FM stations
and a news-talk AM station. And third,
we were asked to assess other available frequencies and determine what
technical issues, if any, were associated with those frequencies.
2173
Garth will
respond to the rotation question, I'll address the staffing levels, and then
we'll ask Jack to review the technical issues.
2174
With respect to
staffing in our Edmonton and Toronto stations, we're pleased to report as
follows. Toronto, which has two FM
stations and one AM talk station, we have a staff of 100 people, 49 in
programming representing 49 percent of the workforce. In Calgary, again, two FM stations, one AM news-talk, we have 107
people on staff, 56 in programming representing 52 percent of the workforce.
2175
In Winnipeg,
should we be awarded a licence, we will have two FM stations, one AM news-talk
station with a staff of 87; 49 will be in programming representing 56 percent
of the workforce.
2176
On the
technical front, Jack will respond to the available frequencies identified by
Rogers but first I would just like to clarify that channel 204 is no longer available
as the CBC recently launched their French language service on that
channel. So Jack? Oh, I'm sorry. Garth, do you want to do the rotations first or we'll close with
that?
2177
MR.
BUCHKO: Okay, I'll do the rotations and
then Jack can go through all the technical stuff which is really exciting to
me.
2178
Canadian
artists on Power 97 currently receive a minimum of 16 spins a week, and these
are new artists that are added Monday through Sunday, 6:00 a.m. to
midnight. I'm going to compare this to
what we currently do on Power 97 and how we add Canadian new artists and the
spins that we give them.
2179
Obviously with
a larger talk component and spoken word component on our new FM station, to
allow the same number of spins would be difficult. But we can today make a commitment that the new Canadian artists
we add from our CD compilation, they would receive a medium spin category which
is between 12 and 18 spins currently utilized on our FM, on Power 97.
2180
We also have a
service that we utilize on Power 97 that we would like to utilize the same on
our new FM station which is called "WritetheMusic.Com" and it's a service that
gives us upwards 1,800 participants in a week and we add the new music to our
website and listeners are asked to go to the website and write the songs that
they like. In that are new Canadian
artists also.
2181
This
significantly increases the spins that we give artists based on the listener
feedback. So Canadian artists recently,
like Nickelback, Default and Sum41, Sum41 being a fairly new Canadian act, have
now reached the international power category, which is 30 spins a week, based
on listener response on music that they really, really like. So being Canadian or international, it
really doesn't matter. If it's on the
"WritetheMusic.Com" the spin rate will go up significantly over the medium
category. And unless there's any other
further questions, that's how we will do it.
2182
MR.
HEPNER: Now for that exciting
stuff. It's interesting to note that
here in the Prairies where we have such broad, vast spaces and relatively
little population, we're now getting into the category where there actually is
frequency congestion. My counterpart
from Toronto area obviously is very familiar with this and we're just beginning
to learn what it means to work in a congested area. So we are not afraid of a challenge. We certainly would invite to explore new creative ways of using
these frequencies that are presently available and possibly could become
available.
2183
Now, in the
list that's before me, we have obviously the 99.1, which is channel 256. We all know the beauty of that. But if that doesn't become available, then
there are four others that were put on my sheet over here. And incidentally, I should mention that we
of course as such have not done an alternate study of the frequencies that
could possibly be used by ourselves and others. But the channel 210, 89.9, yesterday when I turned on my radio,
lo and behold, there is a frequency already operating there. It's not in the cards anymore: CBC French.
2184
Then there is
the channel 204, 88.7. The suggestion
has been made that possibly Corus could utilize that particular one. Well, as has already been indicated, that
particular frequency in order to overcome the interference problems, basically
would need to be co-sited at the CBC Starbuck site. And that obviously paints an entirely different scenario for us
as Corus in terms of the overall implication, especially the way it would
affect the budget and the ongoing expenses and so forth. So that would not be at the top of our
technical selection to begin with.
2185
Then there is
the other one, channel 273, which is frequency 102.5, that in its present
category of the classification of the ruling would require that it possibly be
a directional system. Again, that is a
very more complex thing for us to mount on our proposed tower.
2186
The same would
apply for channel 284, 104.7. But in
the very quick discussions that we've had with our consultants, there appears
to be a feeling ‑‑ and this is not a researched condition ‑‑
but that possibly the 284 frequency, 104.7, might be a second best viability
for us. But again, as I would like to
qualify it from the earlier statement, this needs distinct research. And it is my, from an engineering
perspective, suggestion that I would like to make is that we sit back and just
have a thorough re-evaluation in terms of where everything is headed with the
frequencies here in Winnipeg because we've got to live together. I'm sure if we study this together, we can
make things go a lot further.
2187
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Can I just ask, Mr.
Hepner, in terms of 88.7, channel 204, in your view there's nothing wrong with
the coverage, it's just the extra cost?
2188
MR.
HEPNER: No, there is an added concern,
and one of the other companies that is intending to apply for the -- that is
applying for the 99.1 would in effect also be moving closer to the city for the
express purpose of trying to increase their downtown coverage intensity. And so that, of course, is the added concern
that we would have in that we are moving further away from the city with a
signal that would then become less usable in the real downtown area of
Winnipeg.
2189
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay. Thank you very much. I must say I heard Mr. Hepner, and one of
the quotable quotes I will remember for this whole hearing was Mr. Edwards
saying to me right at the start of the hearing that he's had some interesting
charts that he could share with me, and I felt my eyes glazing over, with all
respect, Mr. Edwards. Thank you.
2190
THE
SECRETARY: Thank you, Madam Chair. I now call Global Communications
Limited. Please begin when you're
ready.
2191
MS. BELL: Good morning, Madam Chair,
Commissioners. My name is Charlotte
Bell. With me are Gerry Noble and Jim
Moltner our technical consultant.
2192
We do not wish
to present comments on the other applications before you at this hearing. We believe that we've made our case for a
new FM station and that you've explored the issues raised by each applicant
fully and fairly.
2193
However, we did
agree to return in this phase with replies to four questions raised during our
presentation. In addition, we would
like to provide one point of clarification to our CTD initiatives, with your
permission.
2194
First, you
asked us if we would accept the statement of principles developed during the
group licensing process for the relationship between our newspapers and the
radio station. As we noted during our
presentation, we do not expect there to be a significant exchange between the
newspaper group and radio. Nonetheless,
as you are aware, we have been working with the CBSC in order to develop an
industry code that would be administered by them. We expect that this code will be finalized very soon and long
before the station's launch, and Smooth FM would adhere to that code.
2195
Second, you
asked us what the difference in the number of people to be served would be
using our location and power for 99.1 as opposed to those proposed by Rogers
and Corus. Our site is 25 kilometres to
the west of those proposed by other applicants. Our Grade B contour will provide service to a total of 806,065
people whereas Rogers would reach 777,032 people and Corus 746,374 people. The difference is explained by the fact that
our B contour will include Portage La Prairie, Winkler and Morden, whereas
theirs would not. I hope I said that
correctly.
2196
Third, you
asked us what our second choice of frequency would be. I would like to reiterate that our
preference is by far to serve Winnipeg on 99.1 at 100,000 watts. As both we and Rogers indicated, there are limitations
on each of the other frequency choices.
2197
We submit that
a jazz station provides a much greater dynamic range of sound than a rock or
pop station, ranging from solo piano to big bands. Our use of 99.1 would not cause any fourth channel interference
problems with other stations in the market, unlike either Corus or Rogers. In addition, as I noted on Monday, we
believe that the diversity of our format, our exposure of Canadian jazz talent,
and our significant contribution to Canadian talent make our application the
best use of the frequency.
2198
If you do not
see fit to award us 99.1, of course, we would want an opportunity to optimize
another frequency. Our preference would
be that you issue us a licence based upon us returning to you within a few months
with a proposal to use a frequency accepted both by the Commission and Industry
Canada. This is the approach you used
in licensing a smooth jazz station to Telemedia in Calgary.
2199
That being
said, we wish to be responsive to your question. Without a full technical brief, it appears to us that the best
second choice would be channel 272, or 102.3 FM. This is not one of the frequencies mentioned by Rogers the other
day; they suggested 102.5. However,
from our site 102.3 appears to be a better choice.
2200
Fourth, Mr.
McCallum asked if we would accept a condition of licence limiting us to 20
hours per week of acquired programming.
I would note that the Commission's general policy, as outlined in the
application form, is that at least one-third of the programming be local. Our current draft schedule only includes
eight hours of acquired programming.
2201
Smooth jazz is
a developing format and we may see new stations licensed across the
country. Given the niche nature of the
format, it may well be that we will want to share some of our programs with
other stations and perhaps broadcast some of theirs, particularly those
providing exposure for Canadian artists, concerts from the various jazz
festivals, and other features. We
believe that a condition of licence limiting smooth jazz to no more than 20
hours a week might be overly restrictive, particularly given all of the other
conditions we have accepted, i.e. 70 percent jazz music, 35 percent Category 3
Canadian content, both in the broadcast day and between 6:00 a.m. and 6:00
p.m., as well as our contribution to Canadian Talent Development.
2202
Finally, I
would like to provide one point of clarification on our Canadian Talent
Development initiatives. In our
application, we proposed $40,000 per year to the University of Manitoba Summer
Jazz Camp. Subsequent to the gazetting
of the application, we had an opportunity to discuss the details of the
initiative with the university. They
indicated to us that in fact they could do much more with the money than the
four bursaries outlined in the application.
Mr. Gillis will be appearing in the intervention phase and will outline
the details at that time. I can provide
them to you at this time if you wish.
2203
THE
CHAIRPERSON: I don't think it's
necessary. Thank you very much, and Mr.
Moltner, I hope you've learned your Manitoba geography. Thank you.
2204
MR.
MOLTNER: I did indeed.
2205
THE
SECRETARY: I now call N.I.B. 95.5 Cable
FM Inc. Mr. McCrea. Please proceed when you're ready, Mr.
McCrea.
2206
MR.
McCREA: Good morning. I'd like to answer the questions raised in
Phase II, or for Phase II, I should say.
2207
The first
question was related to Canadian Talent Development details. I was asked about the contributions to
MARIA, a little clarification on the Winnipeg Jazz Festival, and station
sponsorship.
2208
The answer for
the first question on this issue was related to how we were going to distribute
the funds in addition to the CAB-CTD money.
There's $444,000 that was additional based on projections, contribution
of gross revenue. What we propose to do
is contribute $344,000 of the $444,000, approximately 3.3 percent of the gross
revenue, over the initial period to MARIA.
2209
We'd like to
contribute 1.7, the balance, to bursaries and scholarship programs with
Anokiiwin College. This relates to a
question that we'll get to a little bit later.
2210
As far as the
Jazz Festival -- the Jazz Festival was outlined in the application as being an
additional station-initiated activity, so the costs of promoting the Winnipeg
Jazz Festival were already within our operating budget. It's a station-initiated activity. I've outlined the costs related to a
two-week pre-festival promotion special programming produced, artists and
music, prior to the festival, and then during the festival we would be doing additional.
2211
The costs. We discussed the Internet. The cost of the development of the Internet
site outlined in our application was additional station CTD contributions as
well. We do recognize the value of a
site dedicated to Canadian talent, and more particularly, local artists.
2212
MARIA already
operates a similar site. We would be
prepared to contribute additional funds or technical services such as
streaming, if this is desirable. So
while we will have and do have a station website that does promote local
talent, we're certainly prepared to set up an additional site that promotes
local talent and to link that site to our station website. But we would like to further discuss with
MARIA because perhaps, rather than duplicate what's already there, there may be
a better use, i.e. streaming, on their site or something of that nature.
2213
We are already
committed to streaming four television projects that are being produced by MTYP
this April. They're being produced in
April; they'd be streamed later, in the fall probably. This as well is absorbed in the cost and is
part of the station website.
2214
We have
committed as a condition of licence to maintain a 40 percent Canadian content
level in Category 2, and on reviewing the material that is available in
Canadian content regarding Category 3, we feel pretty confident that we can
also commit to a 40 percent level there as well.
2215
Now, regarding
the period that we discussed of non-compliance, you had asked me, Commissioner
Cram, about the period of non-compliance and we were discussing '98 and the
time that the licence was issued. What
I'll do is provide the Secretary with a copy of a letter dated April 9th,
2000. It was written by me to
Anne-Marie Murphy, the acting director at the time. It relates to this period where we did fill out a self-assessment
form and it indicated that some of the programming elements were not in place
yet.
2216
And in fact,
there had been a dispute over the -- not over control but over who was the
rightful board of directors, the members of the board of directors of the
licence-holder. And CRTC and Industry
Canada at the time had required us to seek a resolution of civil jurisdiction,
and a decision came down, the Court of Queen's Bench, dated November of '99
that was decisive and determined who the board of directors in fact were.
2217
We began signal
testing a short time later. This had
held up necessary arrangements to the lease executions and a variety of
things. We began signal testing in
December of '99, we were issued a broadcast authority by Industry Canada on
March the 9th of 2000, and by the end of April we were compliant with
programming, and that's what this letter outlines. It's already in our file with the CRTC but I'll include a copy
for this hearing.
2218
The last item
that we were discussing that you asked me to come back to you this morning on
was acceptance of another frequency. As
we have said, we are prepared to accept another frequency. We would have concern that any frequency
considered ‑‑ we have a long-term lease on our existing
transmitting site now, and in order to broadcast at the 200 watt level that we
had requested, the best option, I believe, for us was 107.9. We had applied for 106.3. Industry Canada suggested we submit another
one for 107.9. From our transmitting
site, that would seem to be the best option.
2219
Doug Allen is
our engineer, who is here, and perhaps he could elaborate on that for us. Doug.
2220
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Wasn't he question was
what's the number two choice? Didn't I
ask you what a second choice would be?
2221
MR.
McCREA: I guess you asked us whether
there was another option, could we consider another option.
2222
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And have you spoken to Mr.
Allen about that?
2223
MR.
McCREA: Mr. Allen was in Ottawa with
Industry Canada yesterday. He's just
returned this morning so he's here. I
haven't spoken with him although I notified his office that we were going to
discuss frequencies this morning.
2224
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Well, can I suggest that
after the morning break that you'll come back with your number two choice of
frequency?
2225
MR.
McCREA: Okay.
2226
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And I know Mr. Allen is
here because I saw him here at quarter after eight. So you now have your chance.
2227
MR.
McCREA: Okay. Thank you.
2228
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you.
2229
THE
SECRETARY: I now call CKVN Radiolink
System Inc.
2230
MR.
SMORDIN: Good morning,
Commissioners. As with the other
applicants that you've heard from earlier this morning, this applicant is not
planning any interventions or commenting on other applications but is going to
respond to the one question I believe Mr. McCallum raised yesterday with
respect to staffing. Then we'll have a
comment from Mr. Smith. Mr. Lee Smith
is on my right, president, and myself Lyle Smordin, general counsel, and on my
left, Ron O'Donovan, vice-president, finance.
2231
The question
raised yesterday was one of staffing in particular and I'll ask Mr. O'Donovan
to comment on that.
2232
MR.
O'DONOVAN: Good morning. The programming staff figure that you
required will be four full-time on the programming side and 26 part-time, and
from the administration side, there will be four full-time, one part-time.
2233
Just to
reiterate, that will give us eight full-time as we mentioned yesterday, 27
part-time.
2234
MR.
SMORDIN: We'll be filing that material
with the Secretary in written form for your information.
2235
Any questions
on that aspect? Nothing?
2236
MR. SMITH: I would like to take the opportunity to
clarify two aspects. The first is with
respect to Mr. McCallum's question of the condition of licence for Category 2
percentages. Based on some further
research and discussion with the staff and what we could do with respect to our
music when we sort of sit down and really sift out the wheat from the chaff
here, for the sake of simplicity of administration, a condition of licence of
60 percent Category 2 would be just a nice easy number to administer and it
differentiate us sufficiently, in our opinion, to put forth a clear delineation
between us and any other station operating in the local area as a result of
being in the specialty format phase.
And that's our comment on that.
2237
You also asked
how the Commission could accept licensing a station with a documented position
of less than, if you will, the going rate of commitment to new licensees for
Canadian content. I would submit that
with the majority of our music being older in nature, if only by composition
date, even though it may be recorded last week by some very capable artist
emulating the easy listening style, that the amount of original material
recorded by Canadian artists is in fact in a proportion less than those
available to "modern" radio stations just because the easy listening world has
not really been exposed via radio to the extent that the rock segments have
been.
2238
So therefore,
there is considerable room for development of new artists and we feature them
in our programming daily and in our future plans. But the majority of the music is historically of an era prior to
Canadian artists becoming as exposed in the mainstream of recording as they are
today.
2239
That really is
all that I have to add on those two aspects.
2240
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you Mr. Smith, Mr.
Smordin and Mr. O'Donovan.
2241
MR.
O'DONOVAN: Thank you.
2242
THE
SECRETARY: I now call HIS Broadcasting
Inc. Please proceed when you're ready,
Mr. Hiebert.
2243
MR.
HIEBERT: We have no comments on any of
the other applications and I don't believe there's any questions
outstanding.
2244
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr.
Hiebert.
2245
THE
SECRETARY: I now call Red River College
Radio. And again, please proceed when you're ready.
2246
MR.
McGREGOR: Thank you very much, Madam
Chair. Just to reiterate, to my left is
Julia Brown, who is with research and development of the college, and to my
right is Ken Babb from EB Systems. My
name is Robert McGregor. We have no
reason to intervene on behalf of any of the other applicants and we invite any
further questions you may have.
2247
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you. We have no questions. Thank you.
2248
We will now
take our morning break. Goodness, or should we go into interventions, I'm
wondering? The problem is, are the
interveners aware that we're starting earlier?
2249
THE
SECRETARY: Actually I have one
intervener who has requested to be moved up in the schedule. I believe I mentioned that yesterday to you,
and this gentleman is here.
2250
THE
CHAIRPERSON: All right. And then we'll go through with a couple of
interveners if they are here. If
they're not, I mean they were told it was at 10:15.
2251
THE
SECRETARY: Thank you, Madam Chair. I would now like to call Mr. Frank Liebzeit
to present his intervention to CKVN Radiolink System Inc.
2252
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Excuse me, Mr. Secretary,
I'm sorry, I didn't hear.
2253
THE
SECRETARY: Appearing intervener number
nine, Mr. Frank Liebzeit to CKVN Radiolink System Inc.
2254
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you. Well, Mr. Liebzeit?
INTERVENTION / INTERVENTION
2255
MR.
LIEBZIET: Good morning, Madam Chair and
board members and everybody here. I
wrote a letter of endorsement on January 4th to the Secretary General and I
wish to possibly enhance a little of what I had indicated there.
2256
CKVN-FM radio
station in Winnipeg is a really great station and really a goldmine of history
for us here. It would be a great
benefit for them to get the boost from their 14 watt measly size to a
hoped‑for 1,000 watt, and I would suggest that this is long overdue in
happening.
2257
There is a
special utilization ability that the station appears to have for stereo and it
has been pre-empted recently or in recent years because of the power range
limitations. They had to choose either
between short range and stereo or longer range with mono at the 14 watts and to
allow the full-time station that the increased power permits to FM stereo to
happen. This will increase
exponentially the listeners' enjoyment because excellent stereo production and
transmission has been the promise to listeners if power can permit stereo to
take place.
2258
Please consider
that I'm trying in layman's terms. I'm
not a technical person whatsoever. Mono listening is almost a disease like
mononucleosis as far as -- in my perception to the air, really, but CKVN has
made it somewhat passable with what they've done under the circumstances. However, the promise of CKVN in stereo
promises to do us all proud.
2259
And there's a
great historical content here. The
historical radio personalities such as Ernie Mutimer, Dan Woods and his Radio
Classics and Theatre of the Air, Cliff Gardner and Murray Parker, and the list
goes on, and these are really great heritage personalities as well as dynamic
heritage representatives of our community.
2260
I would refer
to my letter that I wrote in for a short passage here. The variety and eclectic appeal -- I'm on
page 3 of my letter. The variety and
eclectic appeal of CKVN content in broadcasting cannot be matched in our
listening area. As a matter of fact, I
believe the eclectic word spells it out well, something for everyone, at least
at some times. We learn about our
community, the world, culture and heritage from the best broadcasters
available. Persons like Cliff Gardner,
Ernie Mutimer, Danny Woods, Murray Parker and a plethora of others who are
broadcasting and announcing icons in our area.
Some have travelled afar and returned with enriching first-hand
experience of the other parts of our country, which they aptly impart to us
with special feeling and emotion. It's
sort of like placing you right there, and experiencing their described
experiences yourself. To me, that's
communicating.
2261
CKVN's library
has been enriched by our community to an extent not available to be duplicated
anywhere else, in my estimation.
Heritage music of all veins, popular, jazz, classical, bluegrass,
country, country western, regional, some rock, and from all parts of the world
enrich us constantly when this fine station is alive and with us.
2262
But it doesn't
stop there. Some archive footage of
broadcast legends and icons such as Cactus Jack Wells and others who may no
longer be with us, they can still enrich us long after we have lost them. Comedy, community activity, and special
group interviews further expand our listening horizons, capped off by Dan
Woods' Theatre of the Air.
2263
And CKVN is
more than just a variety and nostalgia station. It is living history of our country and community in action.
2264
Since your CRTC
mandate falls under the Heritage Canada banner, I respectfully submit that the
Minister herself should be made fully aware of what this fine station, CKVN,
promises to contribute to her Heritage mandate. I challenge you to find any station that can even come close to
CKVN for heritage as well as current community communication activity.
2265
Your delay to
date to grant CKVN a full-time station status has been extremely hard and
difficult to survive from a personal perspective, and we would get a couple of
extremely great weeks of transmission only to be plunged into subsequent weeks
of darkness until the next venue would surface.
2266
Withdrawal
symptoms at these times have been, well, in my estimation, somewhat
severe. I believe they have been
unnecessary and harsh and unusual punishment that the CRTC has to date needlessly
inflicted on the citizens of Winnipeg.
2267
It is long
overdue for you to correct your aberrant and abhorrent behaviour of the past in
this regard. CKVN contributes to our
pride in our history, our positive outlooks and energies and truly relaxing and
enjoyment in listening. That is not
duplicated elsewhere. There is a
built-in educational component also of great value. Each time the station returns to the air it is like greeting and
welcoming a long lost friend.
2268
The CKVN
library and archives is such a treasury of history of music, radio, theatre
archives and such variety dating back to the earliest wax recordings near the
turn of the 20th century as it turned from the 19th century. I'm positive they have some one-of-a-kind
historical radio artefact recordings that your encouraging their efforts will
permit to be preserved and promoted to us as our heritage.
2269
Your assistance
to provide the station with a strong, clear signal will be truly cheered and
celebrated by the citizens of Winnipeg and anywhere their extremely welcome
transmissions can reach.
2270
There has been
truly too great a gap in the local Winnipeg broadcasting for far too long, and
please correct this and bring our true radio station back to us on a full-time
basis.
2271
I realize that
most TV stations won't appreciate the fact that CKVN's Theatre of the Air
presentations are of a higher quality and content than some of their TV
presentations. However, when this
becomes apparent, you will have found a tool to encourage TV stations to improve
their broadcasts or continue to lose viewers to listeners turning to the radio
Theatres of the Air in a big way.
2272
Regardless,
CKVN promises to do your Commission and department proud. Please allow them to do so to the benefit
and enjoyment of us all. Please grant
full-time higher powered station requests to CKVN ASAP. Our nerves become quite frayed after more
than five years of imposed withdrawal periods.
A lasting and full-time stereo FM CKVN station promises to correct this
vacuum in content big-time. Please
allow this correction to happen ASAP.
2273
And I thank
you.
2274
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Commissioner Cardozo wants
to ask you a question or two.
2275
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: I've got a couple of questions
and I promise they won't be of a technical nature, but I notice you're the only
member of the supporters of CKVN who asked to appear. There were a large number of people who wrote letters, so you
have quite a burden on your shoulders to speak for all those people who were
here yesterday. I won't fray your nerves
any more than they have been over the past while.
2276
MR.
LIEBZEIT: They're back on the air right
now so that helps to sooth the nerves.
2277
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Is it your sense that people
are looking for the music or the talk part, the spoken word part of the
programming that is offered on this channel, or is it both?
2278
MR.
LIEBZEIT: Actually, it's something that
goes beyond just what a regular radio station has to present. They have sort of a special environment that
is created that sort of meshes both the areas you're mentioning plus many
others, because it's something that in their extreme knowledge from the icon of
radio broadcasting perspective, they know so much from what has gone on and
they keep up to date with what's going on at the present.
2279
And what was
mentioned by Mr. Smith, I believe, this morning was that they are trying to
bring alive some of the things from the past that go back many years and are
being presented by our Canadian musicians and artists today. This is a venue that I think is very
challenging to these artists and it can be a very mutual benefit. There's a synergy that can be had there if
permitted and not just technically put into a little sub-category of music or
community interest of some sort.
2280
The merging
such as ‑‑ well, for instance one thing that comes to mind is
Diana Krall, if you look at her presentation.
She's Canadian. She may not be
from Winnipeg, but her content has been exposed and it's like bringing to life
some of the music that has been before in the 1940s and even before and
bringing it up to date at the same time.
2281
This could be
done with our local artists as well, and this would be doing a great service
both to the community and it would be doing sort of double duty with your
department because being under the Heritage Department banner, that, I believe,
is one of the components that they are interested to preserve and enhance for
the country at large and our community as well.
2282
Somehow it
seems that when it comes from these many facets that are being put together at
the same time, there has to be a unique quality that the station is being
considered for rather than just, you know, simple rock or pop. Easy listening I don't think covers it all,
but it's the category that they had to choose from, from what you made
available to them.
2283
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Doesn't the term nostalgia
radio cover it, too?
2284
MR.
LIEBZEIT: Not completely because
nostalgia often, in my estimation at least, has a connotation of going into the
past and wanting to bring back the old times and whatever. There is a component of that, there's no
doubt about it. But I believe that the
alive portion, like I was just mentioning, of encouraging local artists,
bringing in people from the community that are knowledgeable artists and have something
to impart to us in an educational way is of great benefit that is alive and
active, not just nostalgia, which has a connotation of being buried in the
past.
2285
It's not a
complete archive type of operation.
It's bringing history alive and that's a tricky thing to do at times,
because if it's just labelled nostalgia, somehow it doesn't cover it as well as
it should.
2286
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: In the weeks when the radio
has not been on the air and you've had the days of your frayed nerves ‑‑
2287
MR. LIEBZEIT: Withdrawal, yeah.
2288
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: -- and withdrawal, what do you
listen to?
2289
MR.
LIEBZEIT: Well, I sometimes turn off
the radio, period, and sometimes there may be fragments here and there of some
music on some of the stations. But
there's so much rock on the stations now that if you tune in, there's not much
of an alternative in many instances.
2290
Even the
stations that do have perhaps what you might call easy listening may only have
a spurt of half an hour to one or two hours at the maximum and then that's
it. Whereas CKVN has the perspective of
24/7 for the benefit of us all, and there's such a variety as well. It's not just nostalgia; there's a great
variety.
2291
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Now, for a station like this
to be viable, it's got to have a sufficiently large base that advertisers want
to advertise on the station. You may
not be an expert in marketing issues, but is it your sense that there's enough
people in the Winnipeg area who are going to be listeners that advertisers are
going to want to advertise on the station?
2292
MR.
LIEBZEIT: I would expect so because I
think there's a hidden audience there that somehow they're able to touch base
sometimes but they're not always aware that the station is back on the air
until they're almost off again because of these pauses. As a result, if there was a continuous flow,
I think from the advertisers' perspective that this would be a great stability
for their purposes and it would be also a great stabilizing feature from the
listeners' perspective because you know what to expect and you know that you
can tune in and not have dead air.
2293
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Thanks very much for
that. I've got to tell you, you echo
the views of all the people who wrote in.
I've read a lot of those letters, all those letters, and you've probably
read them as well because you certainly have the same passion as all the other
people who wrote in. So thanks for
coming this morning.
2294
MR.
LIEBZEIT: Thank you.
2295
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you. Mr. Secretary.
2296
THE
SECRETARY: Thank you, Madam Chair. I understand that Mr. McLeod from Native
Communications is not here yet but will be a bit later this morning. So with your leave, I'll move on to the interveners
for Global Communications. I'd now like
to call Mr. Richard Gillis. Is Mr.
Gillis in the room? I'll move on. I'd now like to call -- oh, Mr. Gillis just
entered the room. Please proceed when
you're ready, sir.
2297
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Good morning, Mr.
Gillis. Go ahead when you're ready.
INTERVENTION / INTERVENTION
2298
MR. GILLIS: All right.
My name is Richard Gillis. I'm a
professor of music at the University of Manitoba. I teach trumpet and do the jazz bands and I'm also artistic
director of the Winnipeg Jazz Orchestra, a big band of professional musicians
in Winnipeg. And I also am a musician
myself and play with some groups in town, at times with the WSO, with Ron Paley
and some groups out of Manitoba as well.
2299
My perspective
is from the point of view of an educator in instrumental music and jazz, a
performer and bandleader.
2300
I wanted to
lend my support to the proposal being put forward by Global Communications to
establish a new FM radio station in Winnipeg.
I believe that the station would be a wonderful addition to the
community and I wanted to just make four quick points in terms of the
listening, the programming, its benefits to the local jazz musicians, and as
well as the financial commitment that Global Communications has put into their
plan.
2301
Knowing my
students, I know a station like this would be listened to. The station would have certainly
entertainment value but educational value as well, enabling students to hear
artists and performances that they might not otherwise be exposed to.
2302
There are
obviously jazz programming on CBC but the opportunity to hear a wide variety of
jazz artists and materials ‑‑ many of my students are widely
versed in music and jazz music, but oftentimes, you know, CD's are expensive
and sometimes being exposed to certain performers is not as easy. You get recommendations from other people
but at times its nice to tune in to a jazz station and hear new things,
unexpected things as well. So in terms
of listening, I know that from my experience and my students at the University
of Manitoba and also I'm in contact with a number of jazz students in the high
schools and junior highs as well, and I think there's a real potential for
developing that audience as well.
2303
The second
point, when this proposal was mentioned to me, besides the listening and the
value of the music itself, which came to my mind first, the second thing that
came to my mind was the programming and the possibility of developing local
programming as well.
2304
Over the next
couple of years we plan at the University of Manitoba to develop a Bachelor
Degree in jazz study as well as a Master's program, and I see the potential in
the developing relationship between the station and the School of Music in
terms of programming, and also with the high schools and junior highs,
developing programming that maybe features some of the great music that we have
coming out of the high schools in Manitoba.
2305
There are over
a hundred schools in Winnipeg that have jazz bands very active in many of those
schools, and many of the schools have more than one jazz band. So there are a number of students in
Winnipeg involved with jazz. There is
over a dozen very, very strong high school programs in Winnipeg itself.
2306
Thirdly, in
terms of the local jazz musicians, I believe that the radio station would also
be of great value to the Winnipeg jazz musicians, providing an outlet for many
of the fine recordings that are being produced here. Having some recordings myself, I know that it's difficult to get
consistent airplay and hearing fellow performers as well. You've got to know when to tune in and when
it's going to be played.
2307
An album that I
produced with a jazz group from Iceland last March has received about three
playings in Winnipeg since it has been done ‑‑ one particular
cut has been played three times. So it
would be great to have the opportunity for the many fine recordings that are
being produced here to get more play.
Also, the opportunity to support and develop local talent through
airplay would be tremendous as well.
2308
The fourth
point is really the last point that ‑‑ when I heard about this
station at first, I didn't realize that this was a possibility as well. But it's a great one, and that's a financial
commitment that Smooth FM and CanWest Global Communications has made in its
proposal.
2309
So aside from
the benefits already mentioned, Smooth FM has proposed a financial commitment
to developing jazz in the community. In
the past, CanWest Global has demonstrated a real and ongoing interest in and
commitment towards developing jazz in our community.
2310
As I mentioned
earlier, there's a great deal of interest in jazz in the junior high, high
school, college and adult communities.
Unfortunately, there often isn't enough opportunity to develop that jazz
interest and to develop the interaction between students and the many fine jazz
musicians we have in Winnipeg. Gifted
students often end up going to other centres for their training and
opportunities, when they could get them here.
2311
So CanWest
Global has proposed, as part of the proposal, has proposed providing money to
the University of Manitoba to use for jazz education. My goal that I would like to see in Winnipeg, and it has been my
goal at the University of Manitoba and in setting up the Winnipeg Jazz
Orchestra and the other things that I've been doing, is, number one, I want to
give the students an opportunity to study here and not have to go to other
provinces or the United States to get good jazz training.
2312
I'd like to
enable students to become familiar with and study with the great jazz musicians
we have in our community. I'd like to
provide opportunities for growth in jazz to Manitobans, and I want to provide
opportunities for work for our Manitoba jazz professional musicians.
2313
On the sheet
that you have, it's outlined some of the ideas in terms of providing money to
the different areas of jazz education.
I propose that this money be used strictly for scholarships, strictly to
get into the hands of students to provide money for them to study jazz in
Manitoba. The University School of
Music plans to give scholarships to students for several projects, including
the U of M Summer Jazz Camp, which involves students from junior high right on
up to adult; the U of M High School Honour Jazz Band, which selects some of the
best jazz musicians to perform at the Winnipeg Jazz Festival; and jazz studies
at the University of Manitoba.
2314
Our goal is to
give Manitoba students the opportunity to study jazz in Manitoba, and you can
go over the breakdown. If there's any
questions on the breakdown, I certainly would be happy to answer them.
2315
In conclusion
the value of the station to the community, I believe, is huge. This is a stable company that is interested
in the development of our community and their track record has been
demonstrated. I wholeheartedly support
this application.
2316
THE CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Professor Gillis. I just have one question. Global initially said that the $40,000 per
annum would be given to the University of Manitoba Summer Jazz Camp, and is
that run by the Faculty of Music?
2317
MR.
GILLIS: Yes, it's run through the Faculty
of Music at the University of Manitoba.
It involves many people throughout the province; in fact it's managed
right now by a high school teacher in Brandon, so we try to involve the whole
province.
2318
I had
discussions with them in that that's one part of the picture and it provides a
great opportunity, but it's only a week in the summer. There's many other facets that I believe we
need to develop in order to maximize jazz study in Manitoba and provide the best
benefits to the community. Certainly the
Jazz Camp fits right in with that as one part of it. It is run through the School of Music.
2319
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So really, instead of
Global giving the money then to the U of M Summer Jazz Camp, you are saying
that they should actually give the money to the U of M School of Music to
administer these scholarships?
2320
MR.
GILLIS: Right.
2321
THE
CHAIRPERSON: For everything from high
school, Summer Jazz Camp, and through to the jazz master class with the --
2322
MR.
GILLIS: Right, and not for --
2323
THE
CHAIRPERSON: -- throughout the
territory in Manitoba.
2324
MR.
GILLIS: Sorry. Right.
And not for administrative kind of costs but for scholarships so the
students can actually study from different people.
2325
I also put in
that of course the main benefit -- the first benefit, number one, is the
station itself. The money is wonderful
and I think there's some really great opportunities for our students. But what I want is not some money just for
the University of Manitoba. I believe
that it needs to be used widely through, from junior high right to adult. And so there's different projects that I
believe that may not be down here, that may develop over time. But these are the projects that we have now
that there are some needs. The Summer
Jazz Camp is one of those, the High School Honour Jazz Band. Jazz master classes would also be great too.
2326
And as I told
Global Communications, this needs to be something that we do in conjunction
with ‑‑ and I put down the Manitoba Band Association, the
Manitoba Conservatory of Music and Arts, and the U of M Prep Studies division,
which is training for basically people that aren't going to university, younger
people and adults as well. It needs to
be used in conjunction with other groups in our community that are really
interested in educating our community, not just the young people. There are many adults that study jazz as
well and take master classes and come to the Summer Jazz Camp.
2327
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you very much,
Professor Gillis.
2328
MR.
GILLIS: Thanks.
2329
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Secretary.
2330
THE
SECRETARY: Thank you, Madam Chair. I now call Jazz Lynx, Jan and Ted
Hasiuk. Please proceed when you're
ready.
INTERVENTION / INTERVENTION
2331
MS.
HASIUK: Good morning, Madam Chair,
members of the Commission. My name is
Jan Hasiuk and together with my husband Ted, sitting on my right, we formed
Jazz Lynx several years ago to develop and promote the smooth jazz genre in
Canada and around the world.
2332
Based in
Winnipeg, Jazz Lynx produces Café Jazz, a very successful three-hour radio show
hosted by Ted. Café Jazz is broadcast
on UMFM in Winnipeg and CJRT-Jazz FM 91, Canada's only all jazz station in
Toronto. Recently, we have become
affiliated with the Smooth Jazz network in Australia.
2333
Besides
producing Café Jazz, we have been involved with other projects as well. We have acted as consultants to Craig
Broadcasting and Harvard Broadcasting in their smooth jazz applications in
Vancouver and Ottawa. We also met with
the management team of The Wave in Hamilton prior to their going on the air.
2334
We also manage
several Canadian smooth jazz artists and are actively involved in the promotion
of the smooth jazz genre and the artists, on a local, national and
international level.
2335
The Global
application for the smooth jazz format is very important to us, particularly in
light of the CRTC's decision not to grant a smooth jazz licence in either
Vancouver or Ottawa. We can only
express with frustration what this means, not only to the artists we manage,
but to many Canadian jazz musicians as well.
2336
MR. HASIUK: Good morning, Madam Chair, members of the
Commission. I'll pick it up where Jan
left off. An artist's success depends
on exposure. Currently there are too
few radio stations to support established and developing artists who fall
outside of the present commercial formats.
From our many years experience in working with smooth jazz artists and
with jazz artists in general, we know that they exist in significant numbers
throughout Canada. What they lack is a
vehicle that will help to promote them and one which will give them a voice so
that their music is heard. We have no
doubt that there would be many more such artists since, if they were played and
heard, it would greatly improve their chances for commercial success. After all, why produce this music and incur
in some cases huge financial debt if no one will play it?
2337
Lack of radio
exposure also limits public performances.
Generally for an artist to have a successful performance, the public
needs to be familiar with the artist and their works. Festivals and promoters have too much at stake to take chances
with an artist. They will only feature
those that are already established and are "safe" in the sense that they are
guaranteed to generate ticket sales. As
such, many developing artists are just left out.
2338
Unfortunately,
it is the developing artists that also rely on these live performances not only
for exposure to attract labels and distribution offers, but as well for their
CD sales.
2339
Lack of airplay
results in the inability to obtain distribution. If an individual were to go into a music store and look for new
Canadian jazz and smooth jazz releases, one would find very few. Because of the high cost of carrying inventory
in the stores, CD retailers will only carry inventory that has a fast turnaround,
which is a result from a high level of media exposure. As such, jazz inventories typically consist
of only a few artists who are carried by a major label or have been successful
in larger U.S. markets.
2340
Artists that
are on independent labels suffer from a lack of presence in retail stores and
are often relegated to generic bins. It
is difficult, if not impossible, to find artists such as Marcie Campbell, our
own Walle Larsson, Mark Hasselbach, Torben Oxbol, Ron Paley and Skywalk in
their own retail bins even inside their own province.
2341
It is ironic
that stations around the world are playing and therefore promoting Canadian
artists such as Four 80 East, Warren Hill and Brian Hughes, yet very few
Canadians know who these artists are.
Some are at the top of international music charts and have received
numerous awards, yet are not getting airplay, public performances or even CD
sales in their own country.
2342
MS.
HASIUK: The mandate of the CRTC is to
safeguard, enrich and strengthen the cultural, political, social and economic
fabric of Canada. If the primary
objective of the Broadcasting Act is to ensure that all Canadians
have access to a wide variety of high quality Canadian programming, it is
essential that genres other than popular, established formats are supported and
offered to Canadians.
2343
As such, we
hope that you will give the Global Communications application your utmost
consideration.
2344
Thank you,
Madam Chairperson, Commissioners, for allowing us to appear today in support of
this application.
2345
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Commissioner Williams.
2346
COMMISSIONER
WILLIAMS: Good morning. Can you tell me a bit about your Café Jazz
and what it's all about, what the program is like, and would that be available
should Global be successful and are there are other projects that you may be
working with with Global as well?
2347
MR.
HASIUK: I'd love to tell you about Café
Jazz, and even better still invite you to tune in some time and give it a
listen if you're able to.
2348
I started Café
Jazz ‑‑ I think it's about four or five years ago now ‑‑
on a local station, CKXL. That's a
French community station and it was actually broadcast in French. I only had to go on the air twice myself to
handle the French duties because I had a partner who was able to handle that
for me.
2349
I did that for
two years and then moved to the University of Manitoba radio station. That has been on Sunday mornings for the
past four years. And then I guess it
was May of the year 2001, just last year, that we sent a demo tape to CJRT in
Toronto. They had recently flipped to
an all jazz format and in fact were looking for some smooth jazz programming to
include in their regular play list.
They liked what they heard and offered to put us on the air, so we've been
on there since May 6th of last year and have continued to do that. Café Jazz is still heard in Winnipeg on
UMFM.
2350
COMMISSIONER
WILLIAMS: So it's a talk show or a
music show, or what's the content of Café Jazz?
2351
MR.
HASIUK: It's almost primarily
music. I would think ‑‑
if I could use the Toronto program as an example, it's a three-hour program
with minimal advertising, perhaps four to six minutes an hour. The talk component would more than likely be
12 to 15 minutes in three hours, which means it's almost primarily music. Any talk that is included always gives
historical perspective on the music or background to an artist. So most times I try not to fill the time but
provide information and in a sense educate the public. Many of the listeners who have tuned in and
written me e-mails say they really like that approach to music, and that's
something that they don't get in regular radio.
2352
As far as
whether this program would appear on Global, I think that was another part of
your question, if I'm not mistaken?
2353
COMMISSIONER
WILLIAMS: Yes, this Café Jazz and other
similar projects, I was just curious whether you had done any negotiating with
Global.
2354
MR.
HASIUK: To be honest, I'd love to have
them play it but no, we haven't discussed that. Our support of the application is based strictly on the
music. This is not my full-time job
yet. Probably I devote more time to
this than my full-time job, but don't tell my boss, and have earned very
little. I've done this basically for
the love of the music and to try to promote the Canadian artists.
2355
Other
projects? Well, as Jan mentioned, we've
become affiliated with the Smooth Jazz Network in Australia in the last few
months and hope to get involved with them in cross-promotions between
Australian and Canadian artists. I'm
also discussing at this time some connections with a company in the U.K. to see
if we can in fact get our artists out there.
2356
COMMISSIONER
WILLIAMS: Okay. Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
2357
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. and Mrs.
Hasiuk.
2358
THE
SECRETARY: Thank you, Madam Chair. I'd now like to call Mr. Walle Larsson. Please proceed when you're ready, Mr.
Larsson.
INTERVENTION
/ INTERVENTION
2359
MR.
LARSSON: Madam Chair, members of the
board, thank you very much for having me here today.
2360
My name is
Walle Larsson. I come from largely a
musical background. I'm a composer for
Mid Canada Productions. I'm a radio
host. I host a show called Lights Out. And most of the things I've done over the
last 25 years: I've been a saxophone
player, recording CD's and travelling and generally getting involved in jazz
and the smooth jazz business and related activities.
2361
It's very
exciting for me to see the potential growth in the smooth jazz industry. When I started in the '70s, there was a
couple of artists like Grover Washington and David Sanborn getting just a
little bit of airplay and from there we've seen the format grow
incredibly. It has been very exciting
to travel to Los Angeles and New York and see active stations doing very well,
like KKSF in San Francisco and The Wave in LA.
I know we really can't compare that to the Canadian scene just yet. I think we really have to see it as a
prototype to what will eventually happen in Canada.
2362
As yet, we
don't have the support of the artists travelling through due to the fact that
we don't have the airplay here yet. We
don't have all of the support mechanisms in place to really make smooth jazz a
complete success. I think we are really
well on our way and I think it will take a while, but I think that CanWest
Global is able to support this format and continue on over the years, as it
takes some time to really get going.
2363
I'm hosting a
show right now. It's called Lights Out;
it's on from 10:00 until midnight. It's
a specialty show. I've been doing that
for six years. I was brought onboard as
somewhat of an experiment as the awareness of smooth jazz was starting to build
even in this town at that point. Our
show has grown to become the number one show in town for evening show, for
ratings. You can check that out. That's very exciting for me.
2364
We get many
comments from people wanting a full-time station to be able to listen during
the day at work.
2365
The smooth jazz
format is an interesting format. If you
take a look at it from a musician's standpoint, it's really a fusion of pop
music, the grooves of pop music that we can tap our feet to with the excitement
and the creativity of improvised music.
It's something that's not done the same every night. Even though the band will play it, it will
be a little different, the solos will be a little different every night. That makes it tremendously exciting, I
think, from a musician's standpoint and from an audience standpoint.
2366
I think a lot
of people are discovering this music and making it their own, largely because
people are used to listening to pop music, they've been exposed to jazz
music. For some people, the intensity
of jazz music is too much but there's an element in there that really excites
them. So the smooth jazz, it's no
mystery to me as a musician why this is really catching on because there's
elements in there really for everybody.
2367
There's also
elements in there that are very unique to this category and that is that smooth
jazz can be very effectively used as like a background music. Say you're just working in your house or working
in your office; you're not going to want to hear obtrusive lyrics and
overbearing sounds of guitars and so on.
Smooth jazz is contoured to be a very smooth sound, some would say a
healing sound.
2368
I get very many
comments from busy businessmen or travellers that will put it on, close their
eyes and listen to smooth jazz at the end of the day for an hour or at lunch
time or whatever, or have it on in their office. So it's very therapeutic as well and I think those of us that
love this style of music would have to agree with that.
2369
From my own
experience, we've played in a lot of clubs across Canada and it's really
interesting to see younger people come in with their parents. And they're interested in the music because
they take these instruments at school.
They take trumpet, saxophone, flute lessons at school. Here they get a chance to really relate what
they're doing in not only a jazz idiom, which requires some training and
historical background and what-have-you, but also in the area that they're really
interested in, which is more pop music, more groove oriented. So there's been a tremendous excitement with
entire families coming out. Many of the
restaurants and bars we play in, although alcohol is permitted, they are family
licences, which is the whole family can come in, children with their parents
and so on. So that has been really
exciting too. As a family man, I like
to go and hear bands with my family as well.
2370
It's
interesting. The smooth jazz really
doesn't compete with other markets. A
lot of people you talk to that discover smooth jazz, they feel it's somewhat of
a personal discovery. They say,
"Finally I've found something I really love here." I get those kind of comments a lot. So it's not like you're stealing listeners from other
contemporary styles or hits or oldies or anything. It's a different category altogether.
2371
I really feel
that Winnipeggers want a choice in their music and I say that not just from my
own personal opinion. It's from
actually hosting a show, a smooth jazz show for six years, sitting there every
night and listening to the comments we get.
2372
And like I say,
CanWest has the ability to see this project through, accept a loss for however
long it takes. But I really feel that
the CanWest Global proposal has a lot of reality to it because we know that
they want to do jazz programming. But
the reality is ‑‑ we can take a look at the books. Jazz stations have a hard time. So the reality of doing a smooth jazz
programming and largely supporting the station with the smooth jazz
programming, inserting the speciality programming tastefully at hours where it
works I think could be very feasible.
2373
Another
interesting thing that they're proposing, and this is very exciting for
musicians ‑‑ I hate to be selfish here, but the Friday evening
program that they're proposing to do live at clubs around town is a really
exciting thing. With the show I'm
doing, we did it for a year on Thursday nights. We did a live broadcast.
And live radio is a lot of fun.
You can't do it again. And we'd
have bands and musicians and we'd do it every Thursday night. We did it for nine months.
2374
The interesting
thing about that is in a city like Winnipeg, you have artists passing through
town that are doing concerts. A lot of
them love to come out and jam afterwards, be part of a live radio show, do a
little interview, something impromptu, something not quite as strict and tense
as the concert that they came into town to do.
So we've seen the reality of that as well.
2375
I just really
feel that the model from the U.S., the success in the U.S. and studying the
U.S. smooth jazz station, we really can't ignore that. It's going to happen here. It is happening here. It's just a matter of time, and I really
believe that this is a very positive seed for planting the smooth jazz format
in Canada. Somebody is going to do
it. These guys are qualified to do it.
2376
Just one last
point as far as entering the world of recording and presenting yourself on the
air and so on. Production costs of a
smooth jazz CD are lower than a pop or rock CD because oftentimes the musicians
can do a lot of the production work on their own or at home. So we have several artists already here in
Winnipeg that have CDs out and many of them I'm already presenting them on my
show. There's several more that are
poised and ready and prepared to go on this.
And like I say, the cost is less prohibitive.
2377
That's
basically what I have to say. And I'd
just like to give my wholehearted support to this project.
2378
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr.
Larsson. Lights Out, is that the one
that one of the applicants referred to as, it goes from 10:00 to midnight?
2379
MR.
LARSSON: That would probably be
correct, yes.
2380
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Is this Monday through
Friday?
2381
MR.
LARSSON: This is Sunday through
Thursday at this point.
2382
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And do you actually tape
it live?
2383
MR.
LARSSON: I have the option to do the
show live or I can pre-tape it, and I do both.
When time permits, I go into the station and I do it live. We do not take calls live; however, we do
messages and review the messages.
2384
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And you say that this has
been -- it's number one in the ratings for that station?
2385
MR.
LARSSON: That's correct, yes.
2386
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And number one in Winnipeg
at that hour, is that the idea?
2387
MR.
LARSSON: Number one in Winnipeg. I can be more specific. I believe it's ages 35 to 54 as a
demographic.
2388
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And do you know what the
share is at that time for that show?
2389
MR.
LARSSON: No, I'm sorry, I don't, but I
could be happy to provide you with that.
2390
THE
CHAIRPERSON: I think we can probably
find it out. And nobody has offered you
a job yet, eh, from Global?
2391
MR.
LARSSON: Nobody has offered me a job
yet. But you know, like I say, I've
been in the business a long time. I
intend to stay in it.
2392
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. Larsson.
2393
MR.
LARSSON: Thank you very much.
2394
THE
CHAIRPERSON: I think we'll take our
morning break and be back in 15 minutes.
--- Upon recessing at 0958 / Suspension à 0958
--- Upon resuming at 1021 / Reprise à 1021
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Will you come to order,
please. Mr. Secretary.
2395
THE
SECRETARY: Thank you, Madam Chair. At this point, I'd like to call Mr. David
McLeod of Native Communications Incorporated to present his intervention to the
Corus radio application.
INTERVENTION
/ INTERVENTION
2396
MR.
McLEOD: Thank you. I would like to begin by first thanking the
Commission for this opportunity to appear before you today.
2397
As mentioned,
my name is Dave McLeod. I'm the general
manager of Native Communications Incorporated.
I'm here on behalf of the NCI Board of Directors to extend our support
for the application put forth by the Corus Radio Company for a licence to
operate an FM radio station here in Winnipeg.
2398
I would like to
briefly explain who we are. NCI-FM is
Manitoba's only and Canada's largest Aboriginal radio network. We began in 1971 in northern Manitoba. Due to our long history we are regarded by
many other Aboriginal broadcasters as the largest, most successful radio network
of our kind in Canada. We are currently
heard from Winnipeg to Churchill, reaching over 57 communities. We will also be re-broadcasting our signal
in the Brandon region, 100,000 watts, in the spring of this year.
2399
NCI programming
is around the clock, specifically designed to meet the special needs of
Manitoba's Aboriginal people. Examples
include Aboriginal news, community events, sports coverage and open line talk
formats that focus on Aboriginal issues.
We feature the best contemporary Native music every hour daily and have
a high rotation of the Aboriginal Top 30.
2400
With that,
there are several reasons why we are supporting the Corus application, the
first being our successful partnership over the last year and a half. NCI and Corus have teamed up on numerous
occasions to offer Manitoba programming that would otherwise not be available,
especially north of Winnipeg.
2401
One excellent
example is the simulcast of the Blue Bomber football games. During their last outstanding season, Corus
and NCI worked together so the games could be heard on our network. Not surprisingly, we received a lot of
positive feedback from sports fans in outlying communities who received game
coverage for the first time thanks to this partnership.
2402
Another example
occurred when technicians from Corus assisted our annual Aboriginal talent show
with telephone line equipment. This
greatly improved the sound quality that was sent to our studio, then onward to
the network, reaching music fans everywhere from Winnipeg to Churchill.
2403
The Corus
engineers have also worked with NCI when our technical manager is out of town
or unavailable.
2404
These are
several examples of partnerships which have benefited thousands of music fans
and sports fans in the province.
2405
NCI is now
excited that the Corus FM application proposes to further this partnership,
which will benefit not only our communities but Manitoba's broadcast industry
as a whole. As stipulated in the
application, Corus Radio Company will contribute the amount of $150,000 per
year over a seven-year period to be utilized towards Aboriginal broadcast
training and other initiatives.
2406
I believe that
this proposed partnership will become part of the big picture, building the
foundations of an Aboriginal broadcast industry. Right now, in very real terms, an Aboriginal broadcasting
industry is being created in Canada.
There are currently Aboriginal radio networks similar to NCI operating
throughout Canada. The recent creation
of the national Aboriginal Peoples Television Network, based here in Winnipeg,
is a great part of that new industry and illustrates that there is a need for
future opportunities for up-and-coming Aboriginal broadcasters.
2407
Manitoba needs
to cultivate Aboriginal broadcasters, particularly journalists. As included with our letter of support, as
well as others from the Aboriginal Council of Winnipeg, the Manitoba Metis
Federation and the Minister of Aboriginal and Northern Affairs, Eric Robinson,
strongly support this cause. The
reasons are quite simple.
2408
Statistics
Canada figures for 1996 show that Aboriginal people are the second most
populous ethnic group in Manitoba. In
1996 there were 128,685 self-identified Aboriginal people, nearly 12 percent of
Manitoba's total population.
Conventional wisdom tells us that the number is probably a lot higher
than that.
2409
A public policy
institution, the Canada West Foundation, released a report last September that
estimated Winnipeg's Aboriginal population to be approximately 60,000 people at
this time.
2410
The big news is
by 2016, Canada's Aboriginal population will double. I'll go on to say that Manitoba's First Nation and Metis people
are currently moving into Winnipeg in record numbers. By 2016, Winnipeg's Aboriginal population is expected to reach
100,000 people.
2411
According to
the report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal People, "The potential of
Aboriginal media to reinforce identity and community while providing a bridge
to participating in the larger society is demonstrated in the history of
broadcasting in the north," which is something NCI certainly knows about.
2412
Aboriginal
people have stories to share, experiences, achievements and a living,
flourishing culture. Trained Aboriginal
broadcasters can achieve the goal of obtaining and reporting these stories. We need properly trained Aboriginal
journalists to accomplish this goal.
2413
Over the last
several years we have noted that there is much difficulty in hiring Aboriginal
students who have graduated from a broadcast training program, particularly
with a journalism background. In the
past, we have had to contact colleges in other provinces to find suitably
trained people. This situation exists
primarily because of one critical obstacle for many Aboriginal people,
specifically the youth, and especially in northern Manitoba, there is a lack of
resources in order to gain the appropriate training to enter the broadcast
industry.
2414
The application
by Corus would greatly remedy this situation and offer an opportunity that
would benefit NCI and potential Aboriginal journalists, as well as thousands of
listeners and viewers in the province.
2415
The training
dollars that Corus is offering is a seven-year solution that will not only help
build an Aboriginal broadcast industry; it will certainly change lives.
2416
Each year, for
seven consecutive years, five Aboriginal students will benefit from the Corus
fund. Three will enter a full-time
Creative Communications program at Red River College and two graduating
students will receive an internship for a one-year period with NCI-FM and CJOB,
Corus owned. A selection criteria will
be formulated that will review each potential candidate's ability to
successfully complete a broadcast journalism program.
2417
The Creative
Communications program is a two-year diploma program designed to give students
the skills to succeed in the communication fields of broadcast production,
advertising, journalism and public relations.
2418
In the first
year, students broadly study all four fields and in the second year, they major
in one specific area. In this case, it
would be journalism.
2419
I recently
spoke with Larry Partap. He's the
Coordinator for the Creative Communications program, and he assured me that if
the Corus FM application is accepted, he would guarantee three spots out of the
soon-to-be 75 spots available at the college, the only stipulation being that
the entrance requirements are met, those being a grade 12 diploma and the
successful completion of entrance tests and an interview process.
2420
According to
him, the number of Aboriginal students in the program has been very, very
low. In fact, out of the program's
current 100 students, only six are Aboriginal.
He also mentioned that no Aboriginal students from northern Manitoba
have ever entered the program to his knowledge. He also commented that Aboriginal students as a whole are
under-represented and need to be targeted by the college. The main barrier, he said, was funding. In addition, his department gets calls from
employers seeking out Aboriginal students for mentoring programs.
2421
Needless to
say, Red River College is excited about this proposed initiative. I would like to also mention that the hiring
rate from Creative Communications is 90 percent, which bodes well in terms of
Aboriginal employment initiatives. And
Larry also mentioned that that usually happens within a six-month period after
graduation.
2422
The bottom line
is 36 Aboriginal students will graduate over a seven-year period. Fourteen Aboriginal and visible minority
students will gain a one-year work experience with NCI and Corus. Why I've mentioned visible minority is, when
a person graduates from the program, if another opportunity comes along that
they want to take, fine. Because I
think we need to open this up to mainstream, to us, to everybody once a student
completes the program.
2423
The budget presented,
which is in my report also, highlights 8 percent of the $150,000 towards a
Manitoba Aboriginal talent showcase.
Over the last year, we have noted a lack of events that showcase
Aboriginal talent. There is a great
need for these showcases. When the
Manitoba Metis Federation showcased a Metis talent show at the Winnipeg Concert
Hall, they sold out the venue with over 2,300 people in attendance. NCI also had a talent show at the historic
Walker Theatre. We sold it out as well
with over 1,500 people in attendance.
Aboriginal people want to attend events that showcase our music and
talents, as opportunities for exposure are limited within the mainstream.
2424
In the coming
years, I believe NCI's Country Jam will become the number one Aboriginal music
event draw. The event is broadcast
live, winners' songs are broadcast live on the air, and as part of the prizes,
three winners receive a total of 175 airplays.
2425
Action is
needed now to make this come to life.
Aboriginal youth need to access training through educational
institutions and Native culture and music needs a forum for exposure and
development. This proposed partnership
with Corus will offer a training initiative that will bring a unique
opportunity to Aboriginal people here in Manitoba.
2426
Thank you very
much for the opportunity to speak here today.
Meegwetch.
2427
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. McLeod.
2428
MR.
McLEOD: Thank you.
2429
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And thank you for coming
here and telling my colleagues about NCI.
I certainly know about it and appreciate its prominence in the world of
Aboriginal broadcasting.
2430
I wanted to ask
you a few things about the benefits that are proposed. Number one, Corus said that this sum of
money, $150,000 would be given to you for what was defined as operational
expenses. In terms of NCI's funding,
are you still getting funding from the federal government?
2431
MR.
McLEOD: Yes, we are. We're 45 percent funded.
2432
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So if monies are given to
you as operational funding, is that going to reduce your federal funding? That was my concern.
2433
MR.
McLEOD: I don't believe it is because
we're encouraged to find monies elsewhere, and being 45 percent funded, I think
that the government recognizes that.
2434
THE
CHAIRPERSON: It's a heck of a lot
better than anybody else.
2435
MR.
McLEOD: Well, yeah. And I think the changes that occurred last
year in terms of advertising ‑‑ we were capped at six minutes
an hour ‑‑ that was taken away as part of that recognition of
our funding levels are dwindling. So we
in fact as a non‑profit group, need to find ways to sustain what we
do. But in terms of operational, we
will get the two trainees every year to help, which will be working towards
talk format programs, open line formats, getting news.
2436
I think it's
quite exciting. We did a survey
probably about a year and a half ago and we phoned 400 listeners, an in-house
survey, and one of the biggest needs that people want is Aboriginal talk shows
and Aboriginal, news and weather was one of them as well, which took us by
surprise. But when you're living up
north, you need to know the weather a lot, so it's a need that was identified
in the in-house survey as well.
2437
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And when we're talking
about -- first we'll talk about the students.
Are you going to ‑‑ I know you're going to direct it to
Aboriginal students, but are you going to direct it to Manitoba Aboriginal
students or is it going to be open?
2438
MR.
McLEOD: Yes, we want to encourage --
this is something that Larry and I talked about as well. Through our network, we would obviously be
able to promote this as well on the air.
He asked about that. We talked
about that and I said yes, that would be part of this, so that way the word
would get out there, you know, and what better way to reach the audience than
through our radio network. And I
believe we'll get an amazing response.
2439
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So you wouldn't limit it
to Manitoba Natives but you would only promote it through NCI so that would
probably end up that you would --
2440
MR.
McLEOD: Yes, what we found in the past
is in our hiring practice, we hire an Aboriginal person, say, from
Saskatchewan, usually they'll want to be here for about a year and then they'll
want to move back home.
2441
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Back to God's country.
2442
MR.
McLEOD: Exactly. So if we get somebody from Manitoba, chances
are they'll do better, they'll do well if they stay in the province.
2443
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And then for the work
experience, when you talk about either Aboriginal or visible minority students,
the eligibility list would be just graduates from Red River or graduates from
any journalism --
2444
MR.
McLEOD: When I talked with Larry,
what's happening with them is they're focusing more on journalism and they're
moving into their new building on Princess.
They're going to have state-of-the-art editing suites and it's going to
be a great facility for people to learn in.
So it's quite exciting to have the opportunity that we might be able to
be part of that. Larry is very vocal
about trying to get these kind of initiatives going too.
2445
THE CHAIRPERSON: So it would then only be graduates of Red
River or people from Red River that you would be recruiting for this
second ‑‑ the post-graduate?
2446
MR.
McLEOD: No, I don't -- yeah, I think we
could go outside. I think we want to
open that up to an interview process.
And of course, Corus would be involved with that as well because they
would be working alongside at CJOB as well.
So no, we would open that up.
2447
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And then you were talking
about the showcase. You don't have an
annual showcase in Manitoba? NCI
doesn't have an annual showcase?
2448
MR.
McLEOD: Yes, we do. We brought it to Winnipeg, and frankly we
were shocked by the turnout. The ticket
sellers from Ticketmaster said they have never seen a line-up like they did for
our show ‑‑ they call it walk-ins, where people just walk in
and pay for their tickets ‑‑ because it was around the
block. It was an incredible sight. That's why we decided that it would be good
to help promote Aboriginal talent here in the province.
2449
In fact, our
Top 30 has about five artists on it from Manitoba and we've been in touch with
the MACA Awards, who recognize musicians here in Manitoba. They want to give an Aboriginal award out
now. They came to our offices and
talked to us about that. We said
great. And they said, "What's the line‑up? Who do you guys play," and we gave them the
line‑up. And so they're really
excited about that partnership, recognizing Aboriginal musicians here in the
province.
2450
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So given that you already
have your own talent showcase, the extra $16,000 a year, is that going to make
it bigger? Is that the hope?
2451
MR.
McLEOD: Yes. My thought is ‑‑ because I can see this event
growing a lot and the money that's shown here, obviously we would be putting
monies towards that as well and finding other sponsors to further develop
it. I've been contacted by a studio in
Winnipeg as well, wanting to know if they can work with us to bring the winner
of this talent show into the studio to record a single or some songs. So there's talks of that going on now
too. Of course, they recognize that
when these events are held, the winners have a CD, we play that music, it gets
sold. So it's interesting. We're creating a bit of a music industry in
that term, especially having a Top 30 that has a high rotation.
2452
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And don't you develop that
Top 30?
2453
MR.
McLEOD: Yes, we develop it based on
requests in the evening, some charts in Canada and the United States and we --
yeah, we do. We develop the Top 30 and
its also published every month in the Grassroots newspaper.
2454
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you very much for
coming here.
2455
MR.
McLEOD: Thank you.
2456
THE
SECRETARY: Now I'll return to the
interveners to the Global Communications application. I now call Mr. David Angus of the Winnipeg Chamber of Commerce.
Please proceed when you're ready.
INTERVENTION
/ INTERVENTION
2457
MR. ANGUS: Thank you.
Good morning, Madam Chair, members of the panel. It's a pleasure for me to be here. I'm Dave Angus. I'm the President of the Winnipeg Chamber of Commerce.
2458
CanWest Global
has been and continues to be a long-time member of our organization and
certainly a major contributor to our community. I'm here to speak briefly on CanWest Global's contribution to our
local community, which I think is important to address.
2459
CanWest
Global's corporate success and growth has had a dramatic and positive impact on
our community from the beginning 24 years ago with the establishment of
CKND-TV. CanWest Global has grown to
become an international player in the media industry. Their success stems from a keen understanding of the industry,
the customers they serve, and an unwavering commitment to innovation and
excellence in all facets of their operation.
2460
Their pursuit
of expansion in all forms of media including television, radio, print, and the
Internet will continue to make significant contributions to the development,
promotion, and exhibition of domestic content in the Canadian market. Their commitment to strengthening the
Canadian broadcasting system as well and the opportunity to bring its
broadcasting expertise to Canadian radio presents a tremendous opportunity, not
only for Canadian broadcasting but also for the local Winnipeg community. They are also extremely committed to the
development of Canadian talent, which is very important to our community.
2461
We really
highlight Winnipeg's success as a national centre for arts and culture, a very
important part of who we are, certainly a very important part of our
future. So the development of local
talent, Canadian talent, is extremely important to the quality of our
community.
2462
As impressive
as CanWest Global's business success has been, equally impressive is their
unwavering commitment to Winnipeg. This
community has benefited greatly from the growth with a continuing consolidation
of their operations in Winnipeg. Just
recently in the last year, from their cable specialty channels to their call
centre operation, Winnipeg has been the beneficiary of their commitment to this
community.
2463
One cannot
comment on the contribution of CanWest Global without highlighting their
contribution to the quality of life in Winnipeg. Their investment back into the community, especially in the area
of arts and culture, has been very impressive.
From CanWest Global Park to CanWest Performing Arts Centre, to the
Manitoba Theatre for Young People, and all the contributions to the many
organizations that make up the fabric of Winnipeg's arts and cultural
community, CanWest Global has been an outstanding corporate citizen within our
community.
2464
If we just look
at the slice of their contribution to the arts or their commitment to jazz,
which is pertinent certainly to today's discussion, we see support for Jazz
Winnipeg Festival, sponsorship of the Legends of Bandstand, the presenter of an
evening of Manitoba Jazz, and the establishment of the CanWest Global Jazz
Achievement Award, which is really just an example of how they contribute back
to the community and how they contribute back to the arts.
2465
The Asper
family, from Israel to Leonard to Gail to David, are extremely active in
building our community, and we see their involvement really in every corner of
our community: in education through the
Asper Centre for Entrepreneurship and Asper School of Business, right to Health
Care, with the recent announcement of Israel Asper's multi-million dollar
contribution to the St. Boniface Health Research Centre, really, two recent
examples of how they continue to raise the bar when it comes to their
commitment and contribution to the citizens of Winnipeg.
2466
The application
for smooth jazz is being made with a company that is committed to excellence in
Canadian broadcasting, has a proven track record of success, and has gone above
and beyond in their commitment and contribution to the city and the people of
Winnipeg.
2467
I really do
appreciate, on behalf of our organization, the opportunity to provide some
commentary on what we consider to be a very valued member of our chamber but
also a very important member of our community.
We've always been very impressed with their commitment to Winnipeg and
with all the ventures that they enter into.
A piece of it is how they contribute back to Winnipeg and how it will
facilitate further growth and enhance the quality of life of Winnipeggers.
2468
I thank you for
the opportunity to provide those comments.
2469
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Commissioner Cardozo.
2470
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Thank you very much for your
presentation, Mr. Angus. A few
questions. I appreciate what you've had
to add to this, and I'm certainly aware of the Asper family and the corporation
in terms of their corporate citizenship and what they do for the city of
Winnipeg and the proud citizens that they are and indeed the pride that
Winnipeg citizens have of them too.
2471
Let me ask you
a couple of questions that come up sometimes.
One is a matter of media concentration.
As a chamber of commerce, do you have any concerns about one company
owning a television and a radio station in the market?
2472
MR. ANGUS: Well, first of all, I think this process is
a healthy one and one that certainly our chamber embraces to ensure that we're
going to have healthy competition within the marketplace.
2473
I think what
CanWest Global has embraced is sort of the advantage of the convergence of
different media and how we can leverage that to continue to grow. So certainly, when we look at how CanWest is
progressing and how they're handling that convergence, we've been impressed to
date and we certainly don't have concerns as a chamber in terms of having one
company that has multiple operations within the media landscape.
2474
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: And are you satisfied that
there are enough other -- one of the issues we deal with that they ask us to
look at is diversity of news voices. So
when you have one owner owning a television and a radio, are you satisfied that
there are enough other voices among radio and television?
2475
MR. ANGUS: I can only speak personally to that, but
certainly I think we do have ‑‑ we're well represented in
terms of our diversity of voices, and there isn't a sense, from my perspective,
that there's just too much of a centralization of that particular voice.
2476
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: It's interesting as an
observation, the perspective of media concentration and the role of Southam and
the Asper family has a different take on it in Winnipeg than it does in the
rest of the country, because even when you look at the issue of national
editorials, which I don't want to get into, they come from Winnipeg to
elsewhere, and usually national comes ‑‑ so I think there's a
certain perhaps pride in Winnipeg that national something comes from here.
2477
MR. ANGUS: Right.
2478
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Can I ask you about the -- I
don't know if you've had a chance to look at their application closely. Obviously they have indicated that they are
extremely committed to this genre and so committed that they're prepared to run
a radio station essentially at a loss for the first seven years. As a chamber, does that concern you?
2479
MR. ANGUS: Well, I think it would concern me if the
organization that is running it isn't financially in a position to be able to
do that. Obviously getting into certain
operations, there's going to be a certain period of time in order to recoup
your investment. I think what the
application speaks to is their long-term commitment to this particular genre,
their identification that there is a void in the local marketplace when it
comes to this type of programming and a company.
2480
Really, I speak
to sort of -- they see a benefit from this application not just from the business
case, which obviously they have had a pretty good track record in terms of
addressing, but also in terms of the genre of music and how it will add more
diversity to the local marketplace.
2481
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Tell me ‑‑
you mentioned this, but tell me a little more about how this radio station
would fit into what this corporation and this family does. There are projects or buildings or schools
that bear their name. There are also
other major events which they are major contributors to. How does this radio station fit in with the
rest of that?
2482
MR. ANGUS: Well, I think ‑‑ and
really, I would leave that to CanWest Global to describe in specifics, but what
I see from this organization is a real commitment to the arts and culture, and
the investment in the development of local talent, when you take a look at the
creation of the Performing Arts Centre and the Manitoba Theatre for Young
People, which actually I sent my kids to ‑‑ had a great
experience there ‑‑ in terms of the development of local
talent. I see that as a major
motivation behind all of these things.
So with the establishment of the enterprise comes more contribution and
commitment to the development of local talent as well. That's what I see in the application.
2483
MR.
CARDOZO: Okay. Those are my questions. Thanks very much, Mr. Angus.
2484
MR. ANGUS: Thank you.
2485
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. Angus. Mr. Secretary.
2486
THE
SECRETARY: Thank you, Madam Chair. I now call Mr. Ron Paley.
INTERVENTION / INTERVENTION
2487
MR. PALEY: Good morning, Madam Chair and members of the
panel. My name is Ron Paley. I'm a musician here in Winnipeg.
2488
I love music --
I love all music. I love rock and roll,
I love hip-hop, I love country music, I love classical music. I love to play it and I love to listen to it. And I can hear many of those kinds of music
on a regular basis. If I want to hear
rock and roll, I can hear it. If I want
to hear dance music, I can hear it almost at any time. Classical music I can hear almost any
time. And that's not a bad thing. That's a good thing. That's a great thing.
2489
But if I want
to hear jazz almost any time, I can't.
I can hear it sometimes but I can't hear it any time. I think that's something that has been
sorely missed for many, many years.
We've needed a full-time jazz station, and this station would address
different types of jazz, not just smooth jazz.
They're going to play traditional jazz.
So it's going to be eclectic.
It's primarily smooth jazz but it will play other kinds of jazz, and I
think that's important.
2490
I'm sure that
some of your either have or have had children in music programs in schools, and
jazz is very important in those programs.
Sometimes I get the opportunity to work at various high schools with the
students, and it's amazing to see what jazz, how it influences their life,
their lifestyle, just their attitudes, and this would really help them connect,
I think, more strongly with jazz.
2491
I would like to
say a few words about Izzy Asper and CanWest Global. Izzy is an excellent jazz pianist and he loves jazz. I mean he really loves jazz. And I think that's the reason why he's
prepared to take losses for a number of years.
He sees that the momentum of jazz has been building for a number of
years and it really is time for something like this, for a full-time jazz
station. As you've also seen, when he's
prepared to do something, he will use his resources and do it. I know that if he has the opportunity to do
this, this station will work, benefiting the jazz listeners and musicians and,
I think, the whole artistic community.
2492
So I really
hope that you will give this chance for jazz to be disseminated on a full-time
basis.
2493
COMMISSIONER
WILLIAMS: Good morning, Mr. Paley. What's the jazz scene like in Winnipeg
now? Are there nightclubs, or what kind
of venues would a jazz musician enjoy today?
2494
MR. PALEY: It's excellent. There are clubs -- there isn't a full-time jazz club but there
are many different clubs that have jazz.
The scene has been burgeoning for a number of years now. I can only describe it as healthy and it's
also very eclectic. There are many
different kinds of jazz that are played.
So it's a very good jazz scene.
The Jazz Music Festival has helped that a lot. There are lots of things happening jazz-wise.
2495
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS: Are you able to make a full-time living in a
band?
2496
MR. PALEY: Yes, but not -- I don't make a full-time
living playing jazz. I play jazz
whenever the opportunity ‑‑ whenever I'm able to do it, but that's why the first thing I said is I
love all music because I love to play all kinds of music. So I play other kinds of music as well.
2497
I would like to
play more jazz and I would like to hear more jazz, and I think that's -- again,
that's not saying anything negative towards any other kind of music. I love all music. But we definitely need a full-time jazz station.
2498
COMMISSIONER
WILLIAMS: In your written intervention,
you talked about the proposed Canadian Talent Development initiatives and how
you find it most positive and heart-warming, and as you understand how
difficult it can be to get first established as a musician. Can you build on that a little bit? What are the challenges that you --
2499
MR. PALEY: Can you say it again? What do I say?
2500
COMMISSIONER
WILLIAMS: You say you understand how
difficult it can be to first get established as a musician and you thought the
Global Canadian Talent Development initiatives would help make that easier.
2501
MR. PALEY: No question. I mean, the CanWest Global award is awarded every year and that's
a major incentive for musicians. There
are scholarships that are awarded by CanWest Global. It's not easy to make your living ‑‑ to get
started or make your living as a jazz musician. There are musicians that do it.
I don't think there are any in Winnipeg that do it full time, only
jazz. Most musicians play other kinds
of music as well. But there are
musicians in larger cities that make a living only playing jazz.
2502
So to address
the issue of it being difficult to get started, yeah, it's difficult. I think it would be more difficult if this
station doesn't happen because if the station was around, the opportunity for
young people to hear more jazz would be there and it would be less difficult
for them to say, "I like that. What is
this?" It's a new kind of music, so I
think it would make it less difficult for them to get -- at least to hear
it and have their imagination piqued by the sound that they may or may not have
been aware of.
2503
COMMISSIONER
WILLIAMS: Okay. Thank you very much. I have no further questions.
2504
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. Paley. It's a pleasure to have you here. Do I take it that you also support the Red
River application?
2505
MR. PALEY: I support all applications.
2506
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Aren't you on the board of
that?
2507
MR. PALEY: The Red River?
2508
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Red River College?
2509
MR. PALEY: No, I'm not.
2510
THE
CHAIRPERSON: No? Okay.
2511
MR. PALEY: No, I'm not but --
2512
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Another Mr. ‑‑
OKAY.
2513
MR. PALEY: So I mean, I ‑‑
2514
THE
CHAIRPERSON: I was in error.
2515
MR. PALEY: No, that's okay. That's why I said -- what is the reason that we can only have one
FM station? Is it something as far as
the broadcast ‑‑ like the FM band is concerned or what? Why is it not possible to have more?
2516
THE
CHAIRPERSON: It could be an issue of
frequencies, and then also there's the issue of the ability of the market to
absorb too many new stations. Those are
the challenges that we have to deal with in deciding if there should be more
than one.
2517
MR. PALEY: So I do support all of them but I'm here to
support jazz. But as I say, I love all
music. That's why I'm here.
2518
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, sir.
2519
MR. PALEY: Thank you.
2520
THE
SECRETARY: I now call Ms. Karen Oliver
of the Manitoba Conservatory of Music and Arts. Please proceed when you're ready.
INTERVENTION
/ INTERVENTION
2521
MS.
OLIVER: Thank you. Good morning, Madam Chair and members of the
Commission. My name is Karen Oliver. I'm the director at the Manitoba
Conservatory of Music and Arts.
2522
The
Conservatory is a non-profit organization which provides music education
programs for Manitobans. These programs
include everything from private and group instrumental instruction to classes
in music and art appreciation, and we do include a growing jazz program in our
programming opportunities.
2523
Approximately
1,700 students studied with the Conservatory last year and thousands of others
attended our performances and events.
Broadly, the mandate of the Manitoba Conservatory of Music and Art is to
develop the artists and the audiences of the future. This includes the development of the jazz genre and it's a
growing interest, we're finding, in our client base.
2524
Just to tell
you about the perspective that we take on music education, it's a very
inclusive approach. Our students are
all ages and all levels of ability from nearing professional students to
students who are just starting out, students who want to play recreationally,
you might say, and also adults and younger people who simply want to understand
music and enjoy it more. They may not be
performers, they may not even be musicians, but they want to understand music
and be able to incorporate it into their lives more.
2525
So we provide
programs for all of those people.
Professor Gillis has already made many points from an arts education
perspective so I'm not going to repeat them.
But I would like to voice the support of the Conservatory for this
application by Global Communications because we believe that this radio station
would support the goals that we are trying to accomplish by developing a wider
audience for jazz and by providing opportunities for Canadian jazz artists
including emerging artists to be heard.
2526
The format that
I understand that's proposed for this station is one which will undoubtedly be
of interest to our students and the families of our students. In our current radio market here, there
isn't really a station which offers the specific format that's proposed here
whereby traditional jazz fans have not previously had a station where they can
consistently hear music that they wanted to hear, and so many of them, I think,
have drifted away from radio. We've
been tuning into CBC at specific times and so on but there hasn't been a radio
station which was offering that opportunity more regularly.
2527
I think with
the combination of smooth jazz and the traditional jazz that this station has
proposed to offer, there will be a wider range of listeners which will appeal
to both our younger students at the Conservatory and our older students with
more mature jazz tastes.
2528
We're also very
delighted that the application proposes a significant percentage of Canadian
content because there are so many excellent Canadian jazz musicians, both
established and emerging, who can benefit from the airplay that will be
provided.
2529
On our faculty
at the Conservatory we have many prominent jazz musicians from the community
who are teaching our students, and I think it's very exciting for students and
other members of the community to see those people getting airplay and to have
role models so that they can aspire to the same thing.
2530
And as I
mentioned, we also have students who are nearing professional and would look
for opportunities to also get more public exposure and airplay for recordings
that they are now making. So I see this
station as having so much potential to support what we are trying to do at the
Conservatory.
2531
Finally, I also
wanted to comment on the dedication that we have seen demonstrated by Global
Communications both in this application and in the community support that we
have seen over the years in the development of jazz and Canadian jazz
musicians. This particular application
contains several outstanding local initiatives for identifying and supporting
new talent.
2532
But I think
even more than that, we realize that it's more than a commercial venture
because Global Communications and the Asper family have clearly shown through
their involvement in the jazz program, for example, at the Conservatory, and
almost every other jazz venture that's happening in the city, that their
interest is genuine and it's intelligent and it's sustained. They have been willing to consistently and
methodically invest in jazz development, and this application appears to
continue to support that vision.
2533
What we
struggle with as an educational organization is that music education is not
sexy to sponsors. It's not something
that gets a lot of profile for a sponsor or a donor. So while it may be much easier to attract a sponsor for an
individual concert, when you're looking at sustaining an interest in music or
in arts development, it's not easy to find a sponsor or a supporter. We have found that CanWest Global has come
to the plate for us, and it has been most encouraging to see that they really
care about the future of our young artists.
2534
So in conclusion,
I would just like to say that as an organization that is dedicated to music
education and performance, to the future of the arts and culture in Manitoba,
the Manitoba Conservatory of Music and Arts sees this application as proposing
an intelligent and artistic option and believes it would be in the interests of
Winnipeg's music community and indeed of the community at large to see this
station on the air.
2535
Thank you very
much for the opportunity to present our feelings on this issue.
2536
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Ms. Oliver, when I was
growing up not so long ago, in Saskatchewan, I took my music through the Royal
Conservatory of Music, not "arts."
2537
MS.
OLIVER: Right.
2538
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Is that essentially what
the Manitoba Conservatory of Music and Arts, is the structure -- is that
essentially what it is?
2539
MS.
OLIVER: The structure of our
Conservatory is somewhat similar to the Royal Conservatory structure in
Toronto. The Royal Conservatory has an
examination system which they offer to students all over the country, and it's
a curriculum that can be followed and then exams you can take in order to get
accreditation at various levels. So
many of our teachers at the Manitoba Conservatory use the Royal Conservatory
examination system, so in that sense we're somewhat affiliated.
2540
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And so the manner in which
your Conservatory teaches the 1,700 music students is through music teachers
all throughout the province?
2541
MS.
OLIVER: Our main branch is in Winnipeg
and that's where the vast majority of our students are, but when we get a
request from a rural community we work to find either a qualified teacher in
that community who we can somehow support or we send a teacher out to that
community. So currently we do have four
rural branches where we send teachers on a weekly basis to provide musical
instruction where there's a gap existing.
2542
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And what arts, then, are
you also involved in, in terms of --
2543
MS.
OLIVER: We have a visual arts program
so that we have teachers who are doing painting and drawing and some multimedia
sort of art. And although we don't
currently have instruction in theatre or dance, because we feel those areas are
being very well served by other organizations, we do audience development programs. So sometimes we might work, for example,
with the Royal Winnipeg Ballet on providing a workshop or a series of workshops
on understanding ballet. Likewise, we
might do the same thing with the theatre centre, Manitoba Theatre Centre, where
we concentrate on a certain kind of theatre and work with them to develop their
audience because we're concerned about the whole arts community.
2544
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you. Thank you very much for coming here.
2545
MS.
OLIVER: Thank you.
2546
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Secretary.
2547
THE
SECRETARY: Thank you, Madam Chair. I now call Mr. David Sherman of Jazz
Winnipeg Inc. Please proceed when
you're ready, Mr. Sherman.
INTERVENTION
/ INTERVENTION
2548
MR.
SHERMAN: Good morning, Madam Chair and
members of the Commission. I'm Dave
Sherman, the executive producer of the Jazz Winnipeg Festival. I've been the producer of the festival since
1993 and this upcoming June will be our 13th Annual Jazz Festival, Lucky 13, we
hope.
2549
We present the
festival every June for approximately seven to 10 days. We also produce an urban music festival in
the fall of every year as well as an Evening of Manitoba Jazz Concert where we
present the CanWest Global Jazz Achievement Award, as well as several other
events throughout the year.
2550
On behalf of
our board at the festival, I think that Smooth FM would offer a very unique and
important opportunity for the promotion and development of jazz music in
Canada. The absence of a full-time jazz
radio station in Winnipeg leaves a notable gap on the airways. I travel a lot around the U.S. and Canada,
and especially in the United States, and I go to certain cities and I want to
hear jazz, I know I can listen to a certain station almost any time of the day
or night and there is jazz on there.
That makes a huge difference.
2551
In Winnipeg you
really have to search to find a jazz radio show. It could be at 7:00 at night or 7:00 in the morning on any day of
the week. I think it would be very
important. Smooth FM would greatly help
increase the audience for jazz music in Winnipeg, especially at the festival
and for our events that we present during the year. Jazz music might not be as accessible as pop music, but once
people listen to things, they're more willing to go out and pay to see a show
at the festival.
2552
I think the key
strength of the Smooth FM proposal is its diversity. It's not only smooth jazz but incorporates other forms of jazz
music.
2553
With regards to
their commitments, I think they'll help stimulate the development of both new
and existing Canadian jazz talent through their specific commitments to FACTOR,
Jazz Winnipeg, and the University of Manitoba Band Camp. I think the Project Smooth talent
competition is a great idea to support local talent. And I think the general exposure it will afford to Canadian
artists with airplay in this market will be huge, and it will provide a much
needed boost to the artistic community that has too often been ignored by
commercial radio.
2554
I also believe
that Smooth FM eventually will help create more artists such as Diana Krall,
Holly Cole, Jessie Cook, just to name a few, that can become
self-sustaining. There's a lot of great
Canadian talent; it just needs to be heard.
2555
As I've done
the festival since '93, we've brought in so many great musicians over the years
that tend to find other careers after a while because they can't get the
revenue from live shows. It's really
hard for them to connect to an audience unless people can hear them on the
radio.
2556
CanWest Global
has already shown an impressive commitment to jazz in Winnipeg. I've already mentioned the CanWest Global
Jazz Achievement Aawards. It's an event
we've held, I think, for the last five years.
We've presented awards to Ron Paley, Lenny Breau, Dave Young -- who else? ‑‑
Reg Kell and Ron Halderson, as well as broadcaster Ross Porter received the
award.
2557
There's also
the Asper Foundation Jazz Performance Series which takes place throughout the
year and they do support the Jazz Festival.
2558
I think the
addition of the Smooth FM station, the most important reason I think it would
help is just to create a very strong interest for jazz, especially Canadian
artists, in Winnipeg.
2559
Thank you.
2560
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Sherman, you talked
about the festival in Winnipeg, and of course you set it up. How many people attend the festival on
average?
2561
MR. SHERMAN: On average it's between thirty to forty
thousand, depending on the weather.
2562
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And it's a week long; have
I got it right?
2563
MR.
SHERMAN: Yes.
2564
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And it's in the summer?
2565
MR.
SHERMAN: Yes. And what we'd like to see with this ‑‑ as part
of the festival, there's so many -- like I mentioned Holly Cole, Jessie
Cook ‑‑ we'd like to see more artists of that stature. Obviously, with the way the Canadian dollar
is, I would prefer to hire Canadian acts, and with their commitment to fund
Canadian concerts, with a free Smooth Jazz concert that will only help to
increase the audience for Canadian artists.
2566
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you. Thank you very much for taking the time.
2567
MR.
SHERMAN: Thank you. You're welcome.
2568
THE
SECRETARY: Now moving to the
interveners to the Red River College application. I now call Mr. Ken Webb.
Please proceed when you're ready, Mr. Webb.
INTERVENTION
/ INTERVENTION
2569
MR. WEBB: Thank you very much. Good morning, Madam Chair and members of the
Commission.
2570
My name is Ken
Webb and I'm the vice‑president academic at Red River College. I'm very pleased to be here today to support
Red River College Radio's application for a campus instructional FM license.
2571
The college has
a very proud and longstanding reputation for educational excellence of our
award-winning Creative Communications program.
As a flagship program for Red River College, the Creative Communications
program was selected as the outstanding college program in Canada by the
Association of Community Colleges of Canada in 1998, and it continues its
tradition of excellence today.
2572
We are very
excited about the addition of a comprehensive radio and TV broadcast major in
conjunction with the opening of our new downtown campus later this year.
2573
Colleges train
and educate the workforce. We are the
centres of applied learning, preparing graduates for careers in an increasingly
global economy. Applied education
focuses on the application of skills and knowledge, which includes practical
hands-on experience through labs, work experience, practicums and clinical
placements, cooperative education and "living laboratories," such as our
restaurants, dining rooms, day cares, newspapers, animal blood banks and radio
stations.
2574
A
student-operated instructional radio station will fulfil this applied learning
mandate in spades. The opportunities to
respond to the real deadline pressures of an operating radio station will do
more to prepare learners for careers in broadcasting than any other single
component of the program.
2575
Students in all
four disciplines of the Creative Communications program will benefit from the
opportunity to work at a radio station.
Journalism students will write news and current affairs programs. Advertising and public relations majors will
hone their sales and community relations skills, and broadcasting students will
be responsible for the station's technical and day-to-day operations.
2576
There are a
number of other benefits to the college and the community and to our learners
of a radio licence. It gives the
opportunity to showcase the talents of college students. It provides a public forum for college
issues and current events. It connects
students to the community and to the college by reaching to their homes, and it
will provide a communication link between our campuses.
2577
Red River
College is committed to the success of a campus instructional station. Capital funding for the station start-up has
been accommodated in the construction budget of the new campus and in the
program funding for the new radio and TV broadcast production major that was
approved in December. The college has
also committed to covering the operating shortfalls for the first three years
until the station can become financially self-sustaining.
2578
Red River
College also supports the CRTC policies of campus radio stations being governed
by a not-for-profit organization associated with a post-secondary educational
institution. Accordingly, the college
supports the incorporation of Red River College Radio under the Corporations
Act of Manitoba.
2579
Red River
College is a learner-centred, multicultural college, and this means that our
prime focus is on the success of our learners.
A campus instructional radio station will help us provide the learners
in our new radio and TV broadcast production program the high quality applied
education they deserve and that our community needs.
2580
I respectfully
request that you support and approve their application. Thank you very much.
2581
COMMISSIONER
WILLIAMS: Thank you for that
thoughtful, comprehensive, and well organized presentation. I have no questions.
2582
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. Webb. I do.
You talked about the college willing to support the station for the
first three years until it becomes financially self-sustaining. What if it takes four?
2583
MR. WEBB: That would not be a problem. The funding for the program is in the order
of $700,000 a year. The estimated cost
of operating the radio station is around thirty to forty, and we're hoping to
generate the to thirty to forty revenue.
All college programs are expected to live within their budgets of
course, but they all experience some minor variance from year to year. The managers of those programs are asked to
adjust operations to accommodate those shortfalls. If they become too large, then the college as a corporation steps
in and helps out.
2584
The importance
of a college FM licence and instructional radio station to the success of this
new major in our program is very significant and we would support it. We would also help it become
self-sustaining.
2585
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So $30,000 is only a
rounding error?
2586
MR. WEBB: Yes.
2587
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. Webb.
2588
THE
SECRETARY: I now call Robyn Osmond of
the Red River College Students Association.
Again, please proceed when you're ready, Ms. Osmond.
INTERVENTION
/ INTERVENTION
2589
MS.
OSMOND: Good morning, Madam Chair. My name is Robyn Osmond and I am the
Students' Association member on the board of directors of Red River College
Radio.
2590
The Red River
Students' Association is committed to serving the interests of Red River
college students and in some cases by proactively ensuring that services and
programs that are needed are delivered to our students.
2591
As the
president of the Red River College Students' Association, I'm here today representing
not only the Association but also all of the students at Red River
College. I would like to express my
enthusiasm for the program's application for the CRTC instructional broadcast
licence for the Creative Communications students at the Princess Street campus.
2592
This radio
station will provide students with the training and experience needed to make
it in commercial radio. By providing a
voice within the Winnipeg community, we are allowing our aspiring broadcasters
an opportunity to gain public exposure and experience as they look for
employment.
2593
Red River
College's Creative Communications program is recognized and highly respected in
both Manitoba and the rest of Canada. A
true-to-life broadcasting experience can only further and enhance the quality
of Red River College's educational experience.
2594
This radio
station will be using some of the latest technologies found in the commercial
broadcasting community, which will better prepare our grads.
2595
Since the
beginning of this application, the Red River College Students' Association has
supported this initiative. An example
of our ongoing campus media support includes our student newspaper, called The
Projector, our TV broadcast, RRCTV, as well as our closed-circuit radio
station, CMOR, all of which are 100 percent funded by our association and
created and compiled 100 percent by students on campus. CMOR, the closed-circuit radio station is
unique because it offers all students on campus access to be a DJ and to take
advantage of our service.
2596
The students at
Red River College welcome this exciting new addition and encourage the CRTC to
look favourably towards the future possibilities that this holds.
2597
Thank you.
2598
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Ms. Osmond, and
thank you for coming.
2599
MS.
OSMOND: Thank you.
2600
THE
SECRETARY: Now moving to Phase IV of
the process of the radio applications, I would like to call Red River College
Radio to reply to the interventions to their application.
REPLY
/ RÉPLIQUE
2601
MR.
McGREGOR: Madam Chair, I'd just like to
thank those that came forward today to speak on our behalf and also to Mr.
McLeod for speaking to the scholarship opportunities for the college, which we
very much appreciate, and scholarships are a very important part of what we do
at Red River College.
2602
Again, if there
are any other questions, we're here to answer them.
2603
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. McGregor
and panel.
2604
THE
SECRETARY: Thank you. I'd now like to call HIS Broadcasting
Inc.
REPLY
/ RÉPLIQUE
2605
MR.
HIEBERT: I would certainly like to
thank all of the people that did positively intervene for us in the written
interventions.
2606
Just one final
point, if I might be permitted to make, and that is that I have listened to all
of the presentations and I did in fact scan all the applications. A clear conclusion that I have is that there
really is no overlap between -- or competition between FREQ and all the other
applications.
2607
On a number of
accounts, aside from Red River Community College, all the other applications
are demographically 35 or at least 25-plus, while FREQ is targeted at 12-24.
2608
From a spectrum
perspective, if FREQ is awarded a licence, then the 107.1 mark makes the most
sense. FREQ has little impact on the
economics of the marketplace. So I
think the simple, at least relatively simple, decision on the part of the
Commission is whether we can produce the value to the marketplace that we've
suggested.
2609
Therefore, if
at all possible, and depending on the whole process, we would recommend or
request that in the decision-making process, that since FREQ has already been
in the process for about 13 months, really that FREQ get expedited.
2610
That's all I
needed to say. Thanks.
2611
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr.
Hiebert.
2612
THE
SECRETARY: I now call CKVN Radiolink
System Inc.
REPLY
/ RÉPLIQUE
2613
MR. SMITH: Madam Chair and Commissioners, our situation
at the moment is very, very simple with respect to interventions. That is that we have none, except to say
thank you ever so much for your being here and of giving us our opportunity to
freely express what we can do for the city of Winnipeg. And also, although we don't have the room
full of our supporters today, that our enthusiasm matches that of those people
who appeared before you. Hopefully,
when you do your deliberations you will find that we are suitably equipped.
2614
We are highly
motivated and we have a staff who are fully, fully committed to the long-term
establishment and maintenance of what we are doing, and it's simply an
expansion of an operating entity.
2615
Thank you very
much, and I hope you enjoy your remaining time in Winnipeg.
2616
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. Smith. Mr. Secretary.
2617
THE
SECRETARY: Thank you, Madam Chair. I now call N.I.B. 95.5 Cable FM Inc.
REPLY
/ RÉPLIQUE
2618
MR.
McCREA: The first issue I would imagine
we want to discuss is the frequency question, and so I'll hand it over to
Doug.
2619
MR. ALLEN: My name is Doug Allen. I'm a consulting engineer.
2620
Madam Chair and
Commissioners, the reason we have not prepared a submission showing an
alternative channel was that no one else at the hearing has applied for the
channel 300, which is 107.9 MHz. In
other words, the application is not mutually exclusive.
2621
The channel
initially applied for, 292, which is 106.3 MHz, would be the preferred channel,
but it was Industry Canada who suggested that N.I.B. change the channel applied
for.
2622
In the list of
available channels prepared and provided by previous applicant, these two
channels, 107.9 and 106.3, were shown clearly as available subject to NavCom
clearance. So the alternative channel would
be 106.3.
2623
MR.
McCREA: On conclusion, I would like to
thank all of the individuals that wrote the station and showed their positive
intervention for our application. And I
would thank the Commission for your consideration.
2624
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. McCrea, Mr.
Allen.
2625
THE
SECRETARY: At this time I call Global
Communications Limited.
2626
THE
CHAIRPERSON: They shrink every time.
2627
MS. BELL: Oh, I thought you were making a comment
about my height.
2628
THE
CHAIRPERSON: People in glass houses --
REPLY
/ RÉPLIQUE
2629
MS. BELL: Good morning, Madam Chair, Commissioners,
Commission staff.
2630
I'd like to
start our remarks in this phase by acknowledging the overwhelming support we've
received for our proposal for Smooth FM.
More than 1,200 letters and comments have been filed with the Commission
in support of our application. These
include letters from representatives of the business and cultural communities
in Winnipeg, musicians and their representatives, including those from the
local and national jazz community. As
well, many local advertisers and individuals took the time to outline the
benefits that licensing Smooth FM would bring to this community, as well as to
the system as a whole.
2631
We also wish to
thank the individuals who took further time from their schedules to appear at
this hearing and explain their support to you in person.
2632
In particular,
they have confirmed the need for this format and the diversity it will offer
the community; that Winnipeg is a jazz town with a large musician and fan community
for the music; their trust in the Asper family and CanWest for their enthusiasm
and support for jazz and other cultural endeavours over the years; that
Winnipeg, Manitoba, and Canadian jazz artists are of high quality and in need
of more windows to expose their music; the positive impact that our CTD
initiatives will have in building Canadian jazz stars.
2633
Along with
these interveners, we believe that our proposal is the best one for Winnipeg.
2634
The other day,
Corus pointed out that there is really not a music station serving the more
mature demographic of the community. We
agree with this, but not their conclusion that the need is for a soft A/C
station playing today's softer pop and oldies.
In fact, we believe that the existing FM stations and CKY are already
filling that niche between them.
2635
As L. Pollard
of Pollard Banknote noted in his written application or intervention, "I am
very encouraged that at long last someone has come forward prepared to serve a
discerning and mature audience with jazz music and not just pure jazz, but the
full spectrum of jazz music. At
present, there are too few radio signals addressing the more mature audience,
an audience that is rapidly growing to be the dominant audience in Winnipeg."
2636
Smooth FM will
provide a completely new and distinct music format that will not only attract
existing jazz fans but will also introduce a new generation of listeners to the
music.
2637
We agree with
you, Madam Chair, and the musician you quoted the other day: what is needed to create stars and record
sales is rotation. Smooth FM will
provide sufficient exposure to our artists to contribute to Mr. Asper's goal of
creating Canadian jazz stars. That is
one of our primary goals and we will stick to it. Gerry.
2638
MR. NOBLE: Thanks, Charlotte. We started on Monday explaining our radio
philosophy and why CanWest wanted to get into radio. We also talked about how the convergence of our desire to get
into radio and the fact that we saw an opportunity for Smooth FM to fit as a
format into this market converge with the desire of our Chairman, who is an
avid jazz fan. And as you've heard
today from all of our interveners, they also are passionate about the format.
2639
Winnipeg is our
hometown. CanWest has been here for 25
years as a company. Izzy grew up here;
his children grew up here. That in
itself isn't a reason to award us the licence but it does indicate our
commitment to the community.
2640
We think there
is room for Smooth FM in the jazz format in this market. We think that our company has demonstrated a
track record with the Commission, certainly in the television industry. We want to demonstrate that now in the radio
industry.
2641
Certainly our
chairman and the family and our company are huge supporters of the music, arts
and particularly jazz industry here in Winnipeg. That won't change whether we're awarded the licence or not
because they are passionate about it.
2642
What we want to
do is create a new branch for the CanWest tree, a new business -- the radio
business. Jazz works in Winnipeg. It may not work in Toronto -- who
knows? Research will tell us what the
best format is in the market we go into.
But in this market it's a real opportunity. And although it's true that our financial projection isn't what
we're used to seeing, for the shareholders who are listening we are cash-flow
positive by the end of year five. It
will be a business and it also will be a labour of love.
2643
We think we
have a credible application. We hope
you see fit to award us a licence.
Thank you very much.
2644
THE CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. Noble, Ms. Bell.
2645
THE
SECRETARY: I now call Corus Radio
Company.
REPLY
/ RÉPLIQUE
2646
MR.
BUCHKO: Good morning, Madam Chair,
Commissioners and Commission staff.
2647
My name is
Garth Buchko. I'm the general manager
of CJOB/Power 97, Corus radio stations in Winnipeg. With me today is Kathleen McNair, vice-president regulatory
affairs for Corus.
2648
We are pleased
to be here to comment on the interventions filed in respect of our
application. First, we would like to
publicly thank all those groups and organizations who supported our
application. In particular, we wish to
acknowledge NCI's support for our application.
2649
As you heard
earlier today from David McLeod, Corus's commitment to provide more than
$1 million to NCI will support essential training and educational
initiatives for Aboriginal on-air and broadcast talent. In the words of David McLeod, this will
change people's lives.
2650
We also
received strong support for our applications since it will result in the
introduction of a diverse and innovative programming service which targets
adults 35-64 into the Winnipeg market.
Our station will bring a high level of news, talk and information to the
FM band, blended with oldies, soft A/C selections.
2651
As our research
demonstrated, this format will be truly unique in Winnipeg and also in
Canada. It will respond to a
demonstrated need and fill a void on the FM dial.
2652
Additionally,
we received significant support for our Canadian Talent Development
initiatives. We will contribute almost
$2 million to the support of the development of Canadian talent. These direct expenditures are incremental to
the extensive promotion that the Winnipeg and Manitoba soft A/C artists will
receive from our station. We are
confident this support will launch the careers of local musicians.
2653
Finally, we
wish to acknowledge and thank those interveners who noted our commitment to the
local community. CJOB and Power 97 have
a long tradition of providing an exceptional level of community service in
Winnipeg. Our commitment to the local
community will be the cornerstone of our new FM station.
2654
That concludes
our remarks. We would be pleased to
respond to any of your questions.
2655
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. Buchko, Ms.
McNair.
2656
THE
SECRETARY: And now I call Rogers
Broadcasting Limited. Please commence
when you are ready.
REPLY
/ RÉPLIQUE
2657
MR. MILES: Thank you, Madam Chair, members of the
Commission. I have with me our market
manager, Ron Kizney, who has been a long-time resident and has lived in
Winnipeg all his life. He's responsible
for discharging the duties and the obligations of our radio station and will be
in charge of the application if we are granted it.
2658
I would just
like to thank the many interveners from all the community, business, social,
government, et cetera, that intervened on our behalf.
2659
I would like to
thank you and the rest of the Commission for your gracious attention to our
presentation, and through you, to the staff, who have done a terrific job of
keeping me out of the grease on many occasions -- not this one being the least
of such.
2660
Thank you very
much.
2661
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. Miles, Mr.
Kizney.
2662
This concludes
the hearing for you radiophiles. We
next have the hearing on television. I
suggest that we would break until quarter to two, 1:45, and start with the
Trinity application.
Thank you.
--- Upon recessing at 1138 / Suspension à 1138
--- Upon resuming at 1345 / Reprise à 1345
2663
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So we'll come
back to order. Mr. Secretary.
2664
THE
SECRETARY: Thank you, Madam Chair. We'll now hear an application by Trinity Television
Incorporated to carry on an English language religious television station in
Winnipeg. The new station would operate
on channel 35B with an effective radiated power of 20,000 watts. Please proceed when you're ready.
APPLICATION / APPLICATION
2665
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Good afternoon, Madam Chair,
commissioners. My name is Willard
Thiessen and I am president of Trinity Television Incorporated. We are here before you today to present our
application for a licence to carry on a single faith-owned, balanced religious
television broadcast undertaking in the city of Winnipeg, Manitoba, pursuant to
the requirements of the Broadcasting Act and the Religious
Broadcasting Policy.
2666
It is a
particular pleasure for us to appear before you in our hometown of Winnipeg
today. This is a privilege which I have
not had since our first application back in 1995 in the wake of the new
Religious Broadcasting Policy, published in public notice 1993-78. The religious policy has taken shape since
that time and I am delighted to have the opportunity to once again bring before
you our dream of broadcasting in Manitoba.
2667
Fortunately I
bring with me more than dreams today.
Each member of my team brings a unique strength and ability and
experience to this undertaking. And by
the way, I'm just going to have to do a little shuffling here. The tables are arranged a little different
than we'd planned, but I think I'll manage.
2668
On my immediate
right in the front row is Mr. Richard Edwards, director of programming balance
at CITT Winnipeg, and then beginning at the other table over there is Mr. Jeff
Thiessen, senior vice-president of Trinity Television Incorporated. Going on beyond him, Mr. John Reimer-Epp,
legal counsel for Trinity Television, and then John Downs, national sales
manager for CHNU, the station in the Fraser Valley.
2669
To my immediate
right -- or left, rather is Shane Neufeld, station manager, CITT Winnipeg, and
then Tim Smith, vice-president of programming for Trinity Television. In the row behind me beginning on my far
left are Albert Lo, director of programming balance for CHNU Fraser Valley; Tim
Plett, director of production for a leading local church known as The Meeting
Place; Vicki Olatundun, director of donor relations for Trinity Television; and
Romano Guzzo, hair of the Finance Committee for Trinity's board
of directors.
2670
Madam Chair,
let me begin where my heart is today, with our vision for programming on CITT
Winnipeg. As noted in your opening
remarks, Trinity is well known for its work in the religious program production
field over the last 25 years.
2671
At the core of
our efforts to move into broadcasting is a mandate to create great programming
that is relevant to the lives of Canadians and thus to bring religious and
spiritual truths to life for our viewers.
As a broadcaster, we want nothing more and nothing less than to be
relevant to our community from a religious point of view.
2672
I'm very
excited about the opportunity that CITT will have here to make a tangible difference
in our community by providing a meaningful alternative to conventional
television. I believe that we can
provide a fresh, vibrant programming concept that avoids the temptation to put
religion into a simplistic box. As our
guide in this endeavour, we look to Public Notice 1993-78 where the Commission
provided the following context for its policy, and I quote:
In
developing its approach to religious broadcasting, the Commission sought to be
responsive ... to the daily realities facing many Canadians in an increasingly
complex society, particularly residents of communities where suicide,
alcoholism, and loneliness are widespread.
The Commission heard eloquent and convincing testimony that religious
programming can provide a valuable service to those in such circumstances.
End of quote.
2673
Commissioners,
our society has become exponentially more complex since 1993. A simplistic view of religion simply cannot
meet the needs of Canadians or provide the valuable service that the Commission
envisions in its policy. The reality is
that people do not commit suicide or sink into addictions or become trapped by
loneliness for trivial reasons. No,
they lose hope under the weight of the events that happen to them in daily
life: failing relationships, economic
downturns, illness or fears such as those induced by the terrorists who blew up
buildings in the heart of New York City.
2674
If we as
religious broadcasters are to provide hope and comfort in such situations, then
religious television must not speak in a vacuum or simply preach to the
choir. We cannot expect to make a
difference while we ignore the complex web of spiritual implications that
surround us every day.
2675
With these
convictions in our hearts, we launched CHNU on September the 15th, 2001, in the
aftermath of the tragic events of September the 11th. There have been both challenges and immense rewards as a result
of this timing, but I truly believe that the Commission opened the door to
religious broadcasting for such a time as this. There are certainly few, if any, moments in recent history more
complex than September 11th, and the overwhelming response of our viewers
leaves no doubt that the exploration of the spiritual and religious
significance of those events has been a valuable service to our viewers.
2676
We had always
held before ourselves and before the Commission our vision for making religious
television relevant to our society and our viewers. In the days before and after our launch in B.C. we learned in
real time exactly how relevant and effective religious television can be. We are grateful for the opportunity to have
been there to serve at that moment.
2677
Despite this
overwhelming success, I feel that the broadcasters who intervened against this
application have placed an onus on me to explain that we have not betrayed the
confidence that the Commission put on us 18 months ago. As a Christian ministry, I assure you that
we do not take lightly the doubts which have been expressed about our integrity
in this process.
2678
With respect to
our program schedule on CHNU in the Fraser Valley, I will be the first to say
that our program schedule looks a lot better in reality than it did on paper
when we applied for the Fraser Valley licence.
But upon closer inspection, I am trusting that you will recognize that
the changes are only on the surface. In
our application, we said that we would air religious movies, music videos and
series as well as a two-hour balance package delivering world news followed by
expert analysis and viewer call‑in comments. We have delivered exactly that.
The names of the programs have changed, but the formats are exactly the
same.
2679
Realistically,
I do not believe that the programs about angels and nuns or the classic
morality parables are really at the core of the interveners' concerns. These shows are unquestionably at home on
our station as they have been on Vision TV for 15 years now. Rather, the root of their objections relate
to the news magazine content which we've built into our "NOW Online"
programs. I submit that the only
difference between the balance block which we proposed and the one we now
deliver is the top quality of the world news content that we use to launch the
expert analysis and call-in discussion with our viewers.
2680
"NOW
Online" is a successful and relentlessly religious program that grabs hold
of the spiritual implications of world events that no conventional broadcaster
will touch and helps our viewers to deal with those implications well beyond
the surface realities. Each and every
program specifically deals with religious questions that are capable of
supporting a full hour of analysis and discussion. We know this because we examined a full year's worth
of back episodes for each program prior to buying it. I want to assure you that we proceeded in good faith, in the
interests of our viewers and in the spirit of the Religious Policy.
2681
Now to bring
the importance of our programming approach home in the context of our Winnipeg
application, I would ask Reverend Tim Plett to comment on the approach taken by
his local Mennonite church in addressing spiritual relevance.
2682
MR. PLETT: As a matter of detail, I should probably
mention that I'm not a reverend.
Surprise from the back row there, but I am a member of the pastoral team
at The Meeting Place. The Meeting Place
has grown in the past 12 years from about 30 people to well over 2,000, making
it one of the fastest growing and at this point one of the largest
congregations in western Canada.
2683
Early on in our
development we realized that there was a gap in the ability of the traditional
church to communicate the relevance of religious and spiritual truths in a
post-modern society. The focus of our
church as a result of that awareness has been that in all our activities, we
seek to demonstrate the relevance of those truths in the context of community.
2684
Without a way
to connect spirituality to daily life, religion quickly becomes an academic
topic that has very little practical use for most of us, and to help bridge
that gap, aesthetically and culturally, if you came to visit us at The Meeting
Place, you would find that we have exchanged the traditional sanctuary for a
former nightclub. You wouldn't find a
pulpit, you would find a contemporary stage.
Instead of a choir, a house band.
Instead of stained glass, a video projection unit and a lighting
rig. We use news and movie clips to
connect our teaching to the faith issues in our lives and we frequently use
humour to remind us that, while religion deals with the most serious aspects of
existence, it is, at its core, an experience of relationship and joy, and the
fact, of course, that the participants are people provides us with plenty of
material for humour.
2685
The Meeting
Place is a spiritual ‑‑ that was humour, by the way. Okay, just checking you. The Meeting Place is the spiritual home to
many people who are disenfranchised by the more traditional church, although I
think it's obvious to any astute observer that in many ways we are dwarves that
stand on the shoulders of giants of the traditional church, as a wonderful and
important place in what God is up to.
We bring together many people who are grappling with the fallout of our
increasingly complex and forever changing world ‑‑ people who
struggle with addictions, with failed relationships, with financial ruin, apathy,
isolation and despair. I guess, in
other words, normal people.
2686
It is against
this backdrop that I am invigorated by the concept of the television station
that Trinity is proposing to bring to Winnipeg. I think that this will be religious TV like we have never seen
before, certainly unique in this country, perhaps in the world.
2687
I believe that
television is a medium that has not yet been used effectively to communicate on
this topic. I think we all have plenty
of examples of religious broadcasting done poorly. I think we have enough of them that we have a powerful collective
stereotype and it's not a positive one.
It's a bad taste in our mouth, and that has tended to limit our imagination
of what religious television has the potential to be, and one of the
consequences is that religious television has had limited relevance for many
years.
2688
I think that
the launch of CHNU in British Columbia was a watershed moment in this
conversation, a very positive change. I
understand that it's easier to put religion in a box so that it can be
readily understood and managed, but I know that for the people that attend The
Meeting Place and make up that community, and for many, many more, CITT
represents the opportunity to explore religion and spirituality through discussion
of today's issues, through entertainment that challenges, through comedy, and
through more traditional forms of teaching.
2689
I believe that
this is a powerful tool that can help ensure that some of the greatest ideas
and beliefs and, if I may say, mystery that is part of our history will not be
lost for a lack of creative ways of expressing them for the consideration and
the grappling of this and future generations.
Thank you.
2690
MR. SMITH: Good afternoon. My name is Tim Smith. As
Willard mentioned earlier, programming is the foundational reason for the
existence of Trinity TV. CITT will
reflect this priority by always, to the best of our ability, providing the
best, the most relevant and the most effective religious programming possible.
2691
Having said
this, we of course have absolutely no guarantee that the programming we
obtained in B.C. will be available here.
We will not know that until after all of the broadcasters have
established their schedules prior to our launch. Only then can we determine what, if any, appropriate programming
at all may be still available.
2692
Given these
uncertainties, we recognize that the Commission may have some concerns about
the possible increases in our spending on foreign programming. While we are not in a position to make that
determination at this time, we will never back away from our Canadian
programming commitments. To that end,
we are prepared to make a commitment by a condition of licence that no
conventional broadcaster would consider.
We will invest into Canadian content all surpluses derived from the sale
of advertising during acquired American programming.
2693
In this way, we
retain much needed flexibility to adapt our program schedule to best serve our
viewers, while at the same time ensuring that the ongoing development of high
quality Canadian content remains a priority.
2694
Regardless of
the specifics of the schedule, however, CITT will make a significant and
meaningful contribution to the television landscape in Manitoba by airing over
80 hours of Canadian religious programming per week, including 24 new hours of
local content. We also anticipate
spending at least $4.1 million to buy and produce Canadian programming,
and of course we are also committed to airing 50 per cent Canadian content
during evening hours and 60 per cent in the run of schedule, that's peak
viewing hours.
2695
In addition,
because we are confident that our entry into this market will have no impact on
the ability of incumbent broadcasters to buy commercially appealing programs,
we are fully prepared to commit by condition of licence not to compete with
conventional local stations for the purchase of programming.
2696
CITT's
programming policies are derived directly from the Religious Broadcasting
Policy, where the Commission set out expansive and creative parameters within
which religious broadcasters have more than enough room to create dynamic and
effective program schedules. Certainly
these parameters are not well understood within the conventional broadcasting
industry, as we have seen with the interventions against our application.
2697
Without
reiterating the details of our September 30th response to these interventions,
we thought it would be helpful to the Commission to understand the criteria by
which we will determine whether programming is suitable for airing on
CITT. We have found these to be a
useful, practical guide for more narrowly implementing the Commission's
definition of religious programming, as well as Vision TV's
interpretation, as approved by the Commission in its 1994 and 2001 renewals.
2698
CITT
programming must be substantially consistent with the following criteria,
namely to:
2699
One, raise and
specifically address issues or questions which are spiritual, moral, ethical or
religious in nature.
2700
Two, be
constructive and positive in its portrayal of moral or ethical issues,
religious ideas, dogma or traditions.
2701
Three, enhance
freedom of religious expression.
2702
Four, promote
understanding and respect of religious differences.
2703
Five, present
religious teachings, music, services or events.
2704
Six, tell
stories dealing with religious or spiritual themes, events, morals or
characters.
2705
Again, while we
do not propose these criteria to in any way alter the definition of religious
programming, we are prepared, in the interests of being fully transparent to
the Commission in our decision-making, to commit to the use of these criteria
by condition of licence.
2706
MR.
EDWARDS: Madam Chair, my name is
Richard Edwards. As director of
programming balance for CITT, it is my role to ensure that a reasonably
consistent viewer will be exposed to a spectrum of differing points of view on
religious issues and religion itself within a reasonable period of time.
2707
It has been my
privilege to work with Winnipeg's various faith communities for many years in
connection with Videon Cablesystems community access channel when it provided
access for local religious programming.
As I approached community leaders from a variety of faith groups on
behalf of CITT, I was warmly received and invariably found that Trinity's
reputation as a tolerant and welcoming environment preceded me.
2708
I am very
pleased that the leading individuals and organizations in each of these
communities have intervened in support of our application, and we are looking
forward to deepening those relationships by working together to serve Winnipeg's
communities of faith.
2709
At this time, I
wish to confirm our commitments to balance programming, recognizing that our
written presentation of these commitments may have not been entirely
clear. CITT is committed to airing a total
of 18 hours of programming specifically to provide balance to our program
schedule. A minimum of 10 of these
hours will be aired in prime time, of which at least 7.5 hours will be original
programming and 2.5 hours will be non-Christian, faith-specific programs. We are also committed to co-producing up to
2.5 hours per week with local faith groups as set out in the co-production
agreements enclosed with our application.
2710
Through these
programs, as well as invitations to participate as guests on our call-in
programs and issue-oriented programming, we will ensure that there are many
opportunities through our schedule for respectful, non-confrontational
expressions of differing points of view and dialogue on specific topics or
events of religious concern.
2711
MR. JEFF
THIESSEN: My name is Jeff
Thiessen. We believe that local
broadcasting is the heart and the soul of the Canadian broadcasting system. Each Canadian centre is unique, deserves its
own religious expression, and we are certainly convinced that this is true in
Winnipeg. In Decisions 2000-40 and
2001-698, the Commission specifically averted premature competition in order
not to diminish the prospect of emerging local religious broadcasters. We applaud this expression of local priority
and put forward this application to serve the local Winnipeg market in the hope
that it will further the orderly development of religious broadcasting in
Canada as envisioned by the Commission in 1993.
2712
The city of
Winnipeg and southern Manitoba are religiously vibrant, and with approximately
2,000 letters of support for this application on file, this region is more than
ready for local religious television to call its own.
2713
MR.
NEUFELD: Commissioners, my name is
Shane Neufeld. CITT's target
advertisers will primarily be local and regional businesses that are, in my
experience in the conventional broadcasting environment, presently underserved
in the market. Our projections are also
consistent with the experience of Christian Radio Manitoba, CHVN, which has
found advertisers in southern Manitoba eager to be associated with a
broadcaster who shares their values and deliberately serves their community.
2714
The pre-launch
and start-up period of operation for the station will be funded primarily
through donations and pre-sale of brokered time. Based on our experience in British Columbia, we are confirmed in
our confidence in these projections. In
fact, in CHNU's pre-launch period in the first quarter, Trinity received incremental
donations over $800,000. By comparison,
we are projecting a total of only $275,000 in donations in the equivalent
period of time for CITT Winnipeg, which we believe to be highly attainable.
2715
Sales of
brokered airtime to religious program producers have also exceeded our
expectations for CHNU in B.C., and we expect similar or higher levels of
interest in Winnipeg due to our established market presence with religious
program producers in Canada and in the United States.
2716
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: CITT is committed to
providing a strong, vibrant, new element to local Canadian content. We will reflect Winnipeg and contribute to
the development of a distinct television industry in western Canada. We are committed to this city and have
anchored our head office here for the long term in hopeful anticipation of the
privilege of being granted this licence.
We are intimately familiar with the strong pioneering spirit of this
community that has launched some of Canada's most successful media enterprises. We hope to open a unique new chapter in
Manitoba's proud history of broadcasting.
2717
In conclusion,
in preparing for this hearing, I was reminded of the 1992 public consultation
in Ottawa on religious broadcasting, which I attended together with my son Jeff
to present our views as a program producer.
I vividly recall the compelling testimony that day given by a family
whose child had committed suicide, and I'm certain that their pain-wracked testimony to the
power of religious television to provide tangible comfort in the midst of their
grief and confusion carried the day for the Commissioners who were in
attendance. That family spoke to the
idea that religious television matters in the daily realities of life, in fact
that religious television is needed by Canadians.
2718
I urge you to
grant our application for the sake of those in Winnipeg who have waited
patiently for this service, as well as those who will discover CITT in their
moment of need.
2719
We would be
pleased to take your questions at this time.
2720
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you Mr. Thiessen,
colleagues. I'll be
asking you the questions and we will be covering, of course, programming. What is religious programming, because
clearly that's been raised. Schedule issues,
carriage, closed-captioning and then the economics, the demand and revenue
issues.
2721
I will
start ‑‑ and I forget, I was in one hearing, oh, I guess it
was a month ago, and I started with COLs and I just clipped right through them
to the point where one of the people started putting his hand up because he
wasn't sure that the other person was
committing correctly to all the COLs.
2722
I want to talk
balance, and have I got it correctly that you would commit to, overall, 18
hours a week by COL?
2723
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: That is correct.
2724
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And of that, 12.5 would be
original first run?
2725
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: I believe that we were
committed to at least that, yes.
2726
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So you'd agree
to that by COL?
2727
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: We will. Yes, we will.
2728
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And of that, 7.5 in prime
time hours per week?
2729
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Yes, we will commit to that.
2730
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And then, if I see further
in what you were saying, I believe Mr. Edwards, would you also agree to a COL
to 2.5 of those hours being non-Christian, faith-specific?
2731
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Yes, we are committed to
that.
2732
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And then I gather a
further of that 7.5 hours, 2.5 hours per week being the co-produced with the
local faith groups?
2733
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Right. That may not be in prime time. We don't know how to work that out, but we're
committed to two and a half hours, to the best of their ability. We've been working with them on that, but we want to get
-- we've committed up to two and a half hours of time to work with the local
faith groups to fill up that time.
2734
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay. And that 2.5 may or may not be in prime
time?
2735
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: In prime time, yes.
2736
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay. And when we're talking about that, the
co-produced and the -- in fact I believe, what was it called, "Faith
Talk." What happens in terms of
the production assistance that you would be giving to the various faith
groups? What is that? What would that be?
2737
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Okay, I'm going
to -- Richard has been talking specifically with those faith groups and I'll let
him answer this.
2738
MR.
EDWARDS: Thank you. Now, in connection with "Faith
Talk," that we were receiving essentially as a daily open-line program, so
that would be essentially programming which would be under our direct control,
which we would be working to ensure that we had another method of achieving
balance in various issues within the community. So "Faith Talk" for example would be a program that
would be produced with our facilities but involving as many other various faith
groups as are interested, depending on the topics.
2739
That's not to
be confused with programs that the local non-Christian faith community might be
producing themselves, which as Willard has said, we would be providing up to
two and a half hours of facilities and air time for per week as they get
rolling in that direction.
2740
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So when you say facilities
and air time, we're talking studio space, equipment, production
expertise?
2741
MR.
EDWARDS: That's
correct. And we've
reflected much of that in the attached contracts and general letters of
agreement, that we reflected that kind of involvement.
2742
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And so how do you ‑‑
when you don't have staff hosting and scripting on these, how you achieve the balance
is by having different groups. Is that
fair?
2743
MR.
EDWARDS: That is correct. Having said that, we will also work very
carefully and closely with those groups, recognizing that they know as much
about balance by the time they're getting ready to do programming as hopefully we
do. But beyond that we also have
various mechanisms in place to ensure that programming on the service,
regardless if it's produced by them or by others, remains balanced and
we actually track that through logging process to ensure that if a program in
itself isn't balanced, although that's often the objective, then we find ways to ensure
that, over a reasonable period of time, everything is balanced.
2744
THE
CHAIRPERSON: I wanted to talk about the
agreements that you had with religious groups, and I'm
confused, I guess, about the distinction between religious and ethnic groups. And in particular, there's the
agreement you had with the Shri Baba Society -- Shri Sathya Sai Baba ‑‑
and I ask myself if this is a religion because I read what Mr. Bahad Singh
(phonetic) said and he actually refers to a sizeable number of members are from
the Hindu faith, which is a faith, I mean -- and I know it's
difficult to sort of establish what's a faith and what isn't.
But it would appear to me that -- can you tell me why you believe this
to be a faith? Maybe that would be the
best question to ask.
2745
MR.
EDWARDS: That's
something that obviously we wrestle with from time to time. We believe that it is a form of a faith that
differs from perhaps some of the other faiths, and the objective is not to be
producing ethno-cultural programming but religious programming from that
perspective. And I guess over time the
community will tell us if they're feeling that that strays from being cultural
programming, or we'll find that ourselves. In discussions in Dr. Venkataraman, we believe that -- and he believes,
certainly, as do the others in the group that we've talked to, that it constitutes a
faith and that it is a different perspective on a very large community. And therefore we felt that we would provide
that kind of open access to achieve that goal.
2746
THE
CHAIRPERSON: I want to now go to
programming in general and start off with ‑‑ I'll call
it the Fraser Valley station because I'm not good at call letters, and it's now up
and running. And I'd like
you to talk about the synergies that you anticipate as a result of having, if
we licensed the station in Winnipeg, what synergies you anticipate having.
2747
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: We'll
probably have several of us responding to this.
2748
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Sure, that sounds good.
2749
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Because we're
already benefiting -- the station in the Fraser Valley is already benefiting
from our production facilities here. We're rather
limited there. We didn't have
the resource to build the kind of facility there that we have here and so we're
already producing programs here that are airing out there, actually in some
cases flying talent out here to do the program and then airing the programs out
there. So that's just
the beginning. Obviously programs that
we've already produced for that station have tremendous application out
here and we see that synergy being strong.
But I'd like to refer this to Shane, who will be the station manager here.
2750
MR.
NEUFELD: Thanks, Willard. Speaking of synergies between Fraser Valley
and Winnipeg, we've, to be honest with you, really just started into
exploring that in a real powerful way.
The station in the Fraser Valley has only been on the air for six months
and we're actually excited that one of the first projects that we started in
production actually before the station launched in the Fraser Valley was a
Christian stand-up comedy half hour. It's a
13-part series featuring Canadian Christian comics that we actually shot on
location before a live studio audience in our Winnipeg facility, and that show is airing on the Fraser Valley station.
2751
Likewise, we
would likely try and realize opportunity where it was appropriate to our local
broadcasting market. For example, since
we've launched a new programming concept that we've been
able to develop and actually enter in production on is a two-times-a-week,
one-hour talk show that deals with sex and relationships from a religious
standpoint and that show is called "Pure Sex and Relationship." And that's an opportunity that came to us, a very creative and
innovative idea that came to us from a pastor and his wife in the Vancouver
area that deal with relationships. And
that is something that we would look forward to bringing to the Winnipeg market
because it would have relevance here.
And likewise future shows that we would be developing both here and
there if they had relevance in the other communities, we would obviously look
at using those there, and I think Tim Smith may want to add to that as well.
2752
MR. SMITH: Certainly there are a number of things that
can present themselves over time. You
know, we have just started having conversations with some producers in
Vancouver who are now aware of us and are interested in talking to us about the
development of program, and one such program, in fact, sort of came to them
through a circuitous fashion, I guess, and was an opportunity to discuss
producing a magazine program with Juno award winning musician Steve Bell. So there's an opportunity, and Steve is a Winnipegger, as it
turns out, and would love to work out of our facility. As a result, we may see opportunities there
and this is just one example of a program that could be developed here for use
by both stations.
2753
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Let's talk
about the balance program that was developed for Fraser Valley. Will it become part of your balance
programming here?
2754
MR.
EDWARDS: A program that's
produced and created for balance in the Fraser Valley would be intended for
Fraser Valley. If a local community
non-Christian faith group were to decide that they wanted to use a portion of
that program or all of that program in something they were doing, because they
felt it was relevant, then we would welcome to them to do so and we'd provide
that to them with no problems. In some
cases, they may choose just to use part of that program; in other cases, they
may just use a little clip or they may use the whole thing. And we'd leave that decision in their camp,
allowing them to determine what's relevant for their community.
2755
And we wouldn't suggest that that's part of our original
programming essentially. We just would
want, as those groups generate and create their own programming, to have that
as an active resource that they can use.
2756
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Yes, because I -- when I
was reading your application, there was something about that if you -- if it
was being used here, it would not be counted amongst your balance
programming. Is that the understanding?
2757
MR. EDWARDS: That is correct. We went further, I guess, to suggest that typically if a program
is -- half or more of it is being used, then of course, it relates according to
typical measurements for that kind of thing, but under normal circumstances,
that is not part of the -- that certainly isn't part of the local original
balance programming that we're committing to.
2758
As a matter of fact,
the programming balance that we're committing to is material that is other than
programs that are produced by the local faith groups. Those programs are over and above and we're allowing them to grow
over time, so the numbers that we're projecting do not include that number that
they're providing with. So essentially
it's one that we felt we could leave some latitude as to how much of that
program was used because it was outside of our commitments either way.
2759
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So when we get to the 2.5 of
non-Christian, faith-specific programs ‑‑ not the
co-produced ‑‑ that 2.5, the non-Christian, faith-specific
programs will not include balance programs from Fraser Valley to extend
(inaudible ‑‑ off microphone) 50 per cent.
2760
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: The struggle we have here
with some of the local groups ‑‑ because we've had this
discussion over a period of time and Richard's been carrying this ‑‑
was that a number of the groups locally are limited in size and resources. And so when we went to them initially,
without giving them any -- well, first of all, they need our physical help,
which we're able to give them. We'll
give them help in resources as far as they -- we can't give them help as far as
content goes. That's their
responsibility.
2761
And some of them
felt limited in the amount of resources that they would have there and for an
ongoing basis. So we're committed to
providing two and a half hours of faith-specific programming in prime time.
2762
Now, some of that
may be provided by the local groups. In
fact, if we're able to produce it from the local group and we can meet the
quality for prime time programming, that would be our preference of going
there. But if we're unable to do it
with the local content, we will then bring in faith-specific programming that
this community here is in agreement with, that reflects their perspective, in
other words, that they are comfortable having it aired to their -- because it's
their community that will particularly be receiving it, and so we're very
concerned that their community be not only satisfied but be delighted to
receive that programming.
2763
So whether we bring
it in from -- the fact that we have resources available now from the Fraser
Valley is a huge asset for us, because clearly we are working there with producers
and that programming ‑‑ because we're helping produce that
programming there, it's available to us to use here. And so that will be our prime time, or that could be our prime
time promise of two and a half hours.
2764
Now, the local
programming, if we could fit it in there and we can fill that two and a half
hours, then we will add time on at another time, rather than the prime time, or
whatever -- however we can meet the needs of the local community.
2765
MR. EDWARDS: Just to be clear, the 7.5 hours of original
balance programming that we're committing to does not include the two and a
half hours that we're making available for the local community groups, so our
7.5 is a commitment. We're also
providing the facilities and the air time to ensure that there's available room
for two and a half additional hours of programming produced by the local
community. We're simply not wanting to
place undue stress on them to say that has to be something that we're going to
measure in the form of hours as opposed to activity.
2766
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Now I'm totally turned
around. Every week in prime time there
will be 7.5 hours of original programming?
2767
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Correct.
2768
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Balance, original balance
programming?
2769
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Original balance programming.
2770
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Included in those are 2.5
hours of non-Christian, faith-specific programs?
2771
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: No. Not in the original hours.
In addition to the seven and a half original hours of balance
programming -- the seven and a half hours of balance programming that we're
committing to is programming that will be produced by Trinity Television of a
balanced nature, where we will be using resource to make them balanced, which
we have the production responsibility for, so we can ensure that they're
balanced programs. That will be new programming.
2772
The two and a half
extra hours that we will be providing in prime time is programming that will be
faith-specific but we don't
guarantee is original because we may be re-purposing programming from the
Fraser Valley or locations like that.
2773
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay, so the remaining --
out of the 10, we've taken the 7.5 of original.
2774
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Yes.
2775
THE
CHAIRPERSON: The remaining 2.5 will be
non-Christian, faith-specific --
2776
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Correct.
2777
THE
CHAIRPERSON: -- but not necessarily
original?
2778
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Not necessarily original,
that's right.
2779
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay.
2780
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: That's
absolutely correct, yes.
2781
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And it would be in this
slot that you may use some of your balance programming from --
2782
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: From the local area.
2783
THE
CHAIRPERSON: From Fraser Valley.
2784
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Yes, and from Fraser --
exactly, from Fraser Valley.
2785
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay. The 2.5 co-production with local faith
groups --
2786
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Yes.
2787
THE
CHAIRPERSON: -- will not include any of
your balance programming from Fraser Valley --
2788
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Well --
2789
THE
CHAIRPERSON: -- unless --
2790
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: It's more
than -- unless it's more than 50 per cent. I mean, if they use clips out of the Fraser Valley, but it would
have to be less than 50 per cent before we would call it a local program.
2791
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay, I've got it
now, thank you.
2792
MR. WILLARD THIESSEN: Sorry.
2793
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And when we then talk
about Winnipeg, are you anticipating that the schedule will be different than
Fraser Valley or that it would be the same essentially in terms of the block
programming that you've got?
2794
MR. WILLARD THIESSEN: In many ways it will be the same as what we've shown
in the schedule. There will be a block
program. We still will use an issue --
in order to stimulate the discussion on issues, we will use a block arrangement
of programming.
2795
What that will
look like is impossible for us to know because we're totally unaware -- we're not aware of programs that are
available. But from our earliest
application process, which goes back a number of reiterations ago, the use of
using news issues to bring the issues to the table, to bring discussion out of,
has been part of our application process for, I think, almost since the
beginning. And yes, that was what
"Faith Talk", as it's shown in the application here, is all
about. Again, a world report or a news
program that is packaged together with the issues discussion with people of
expertise and concern relating to those issues. Yes, that will be a part of our program schedule.
2796
THE
CHAIRPERSON: There's a difference in
the commitments that you've offered. In
Fraser Valley you offered 80 per cent Cancon in peak time. There's nothing in this application saying
what you're proposing by way of Cancon during prime time, 7:00 to 11:00.
2797
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: I'm going to go to ‑‑
is it John or Jeff on this one, because there were some -- John, I'm going to
you on this.
2798
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Thank you, Willard. The 80 per cent Cancon was actually ‑‑
I'm not sure if a typo or an error in the original decision that was -- in the
original copy of the licence. It was
subsequently amended and I wish I had it with me.
2799
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Oh. So what is it now?
2800
MR.
REIMER-EPP: It's actually the 60/40
arrangement that we're proposing now.
2801
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Fifty/60.
2802
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Sorry, it's 60/50.
2803
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay, so it is the same?
2804
MR.
REIMER-EPP: It is the same, yes.
2805
THE
CHAIRPERSON: All right. Here, you're talking 7.5 hours of balance in prime time.
2806
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Plus two and a half.
2807
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay, so 10 hours of prime
time.
2808
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Ten hours in prime time, yes.
2809
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Fraser Valley it was 12.
2810
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: It's 12 in
Fraser Valley, yes.
2811
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So why the difference?
2812
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: It's much
easier to get balance programming in the Fraser Valley, it really is, than it
is here. And we felt we were -- we're
committed to 10 hours with the seven and a half original, and it's not as
easy to obtain here. That's ‑‑
I mean, if we need to go there, we'll go there, but our preference would be to keep it at
10 hours that we would be committed to in prime time.
2813
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And of course, we're into
the normal questions. Would you agree
to a COL that all programming broadcast would be religious in accordance with
the Policy Notice 93-78?
2814
MR. WILLARD THIESSEN: Yes.
2815
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And in the event it is
non-religious, you would provide the rationale?
2816
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Yes.
2817
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And also a COL that you
would adhere to the guidelines on ethics in the policy -- in the Religious --
2818
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Absolutely.
2819
THE
CHAIRPERSON: The schedule and the
issues behind that. You have
approximately the same schedule proposed here as in Fraser Valley. Fraser's now launched and it's somewhat different from what was
proposed. And maybe I should tell you
that we've certainly looked at the issues of your proposed program, especially
as it affects balance, foreign, Cancon, and the relative differences between
what was proposed and what is there.
2820
I'm
certainly mindful of the fact that the policy talked about looking at your
schedule and making it a COL. If you
read the policy, they literally talked about that, that the schedule that was
proposed would have been a COL. And we
didn't do it obviously in Vancouver, in the Fraser Valley.
2821
So the concern
is ‑‑ from my point of view is maybe not necessarily the issue
of Craig's, but it's a change in the nature of programming between what
was proposed and what's on now. And
I'll give you ‑‑ the balance has decreased, at least by
our analysis, by 7.5 hours from what was proposed. The foreign went from four to 14.5 in prime time.
2822
So that clearly
then changed what we sitting in Vancouver at the hearing would have seen as the
nature of the service. And so that's the
concern, that at the end of the day ‑‑ and I guess I
particularly am cognizant of the fact, and I understand it's an
interesting programming concept to put your phone-in show around an issue of
current affairs ‑‑ but I don't know if you've read the Globe and Mail today where Jeffrey Simpson
is talking about viewership moving from Canadian current affairs to American
current affairs programs and the huge shift in that.
2823
So how can you
comfort me that this proportion that I see in your schedule today, proposed in
this application, will remain generally the same in terms of foreign, balance,
Cancon? Because those do change the
nature and the perception of the service.
2824
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Yes, I --
2825
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And I hear your issues
about the religious and we'll get into that, and I understand that, but from the
point of view of looking at the schedule as proposed, it's sort of
like going from something that was purple to something that's pink,
you know, and I don't mean anything by the colours I used as examples.
2826
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: No, I understand. I appreciate that. I think the -- the difficulty that -- in looking and I'm going
to let some of the others respond here as well, but -- and part of the answer
even comes out in the reflection that the schedule, the way we had drawn it up
at that time, and it was simply an -- and I think it's a
difficult thing, is you look at what you have available or what you could get
and where you could go.
2827
I'm just --
I haven't thought about this. You're just
going to get this the way it comes, but --
2828
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And I mean, I don't want to
foreclose you from in Phase IV mentioning it after further thought overnight.
2829
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Sure.
2830
THE
CHAIRPERSON: You know, I don't want to
take you in an unfair way and take advantage of ‑‑ you know, I
just want --
2831
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: It's
reflected even the fact when you mentioned that, you know, the condition of
licence when we first received it from the CRTC, or the licence itself, was 80
per cent Canadian content, because it was simply -- the hours that were in the
schedule were taken off and they added up and there's this
many hours of Canadian content, which we came back and said although that was
in our schedule, we promised to the 50 and the 60. And so the very fact if we go to -- I mean, if -- which was
approved by the CRTC. That very
approval, in a sense, agrees to some change in the schedule, an acceptance of
the fact that the schedule is going to be changing, because from 80 per cent
Canadian to 50 per cent in prime time, you know, in the peak viewing hours is a
huge change.
2832
And so there
was an agreement somewhere from the CRTC to approve that kind of American
content change. I mean, that's --
2833
THE
CHAIRPERSON: No, but in terms of hours
on the proposed schedule of Cancon, it included 9.5 religious and four balance,
Canadian balance. I mean, these are --
and then -- sorry, 9.5, 12.5 Canadian balance --
2834
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Right, 12.5, okay.
2835
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Right, and one Canadian
other. So that's 22-some
hours. Yes, of course, the balance is
added in -- you know, into that so --
2836
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: It's
(inaudible -- off microphone) there. I'm going
to let somebody else start because my head at this point needs some help.
2837
MR.
NEUFELD: I can definitely appreciate
the question and I think ‑‑ although we've only
been on the air for six months, I can understand there being some confusion in
evaluating the schedule on face value, and it's certainly been our intent not to
bait and switch the Commission, as it were, as to our commitments to balance.
2838
I think where
part of the confusion may lie, and I'm hoping that this offers some clarity, is that when
we air the "Online" shows, the "Online 60 Minutes," the
"Online Dateline," "Online 48 Hours," and "Online
Primetime Thursday," we are viewing that as a two-hour balance
program. We intro the shows
separately. We do highlights throughout
the show, explaining the spiritual and religious implications of the issues
being raised that we're wanting to engage the viewers in an interactive
fashion, so that certainly accounts for some of the balance.
2839
And that is in
-- I believe being consistent with the original plan to have world and issues
and events, related programming acting as a springboard. That definitely is there.
2840
I do a rough
calculation and I come up with a different number, so perhaps we could provide
the Commission an explanation of what we feel is balanced right now and what is
actually in our schedule.
2841
An interesting
thing to point out as well is that most of the movies that we are running, the
religious-theme movies that we're running are acting as balance for us as well, and
that is one of the objectives of those movies.
For example, last night we aired the movie, "All My Darling
Daughters," which is the story of a man whose four daughters get married
on the same day. The description that
you quite often don't read is the fact that all four of the husbands come
from differing denominations and faith groups, so there's an
underlying religious theme there that obviously does address the issue of
balance.
2842
We tie in a
discussion piece after that. It is
currently not live and doesn't include a phone-in component. We hope to have altered that before the end
of this year of broadcasting, but we are working on that to provide a balance
perspective as well.
2843
It is also our
hope right now, we definitely wouldn't consider "Pure Sex and Relationships" to
be a balance show the way it is airing right now. It has elements of balance in it. I would say that we're working with the hosts and producers to help them
broaden their understanding of what balance is because they've
basically come to us from the outside, and we would hope that we would evolve
that into being a balance program as well, because obviously that is a topic
that the Commission has noted before is an issue of public concern.
2844
We're
definitely trying to offer a balance perspective compared to what the other
broadcasters will provide, but we want to try and make that a more balanced
show with our own schedule as well.
2845
So it's
definitely been the spirit of the original application. We, I think, have been quite diligent in
trying to maintain and if not eventually exceed our balance commitment, and
that paints a little bit of a picture of where we're at right now.
2846
THE
CHAIRPERSON: I was going to say, you
probably have a point that the assumption on the balance programming was that
it would be Canadian. And what's
happened is that for at least four hours a week, one hour -- yes, four days a
week, one hour of it is American, and it's "Dateline" or whatever they are, "Online" -- I don't watch
any of them. I don't watch
American public affairs so -- and I think that that's four of
the hours that are -- that the initial thought of the Commission was obviously
that it would have been Cancon.
2847
MR.
NEUFELD: Mm-hmm.
2848
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And you probably, also, in
terms of balance ‑‑ it could have been an assumption, albeit
erroneous or whatever, that the movies, being balanced programming, would have
been Canadian. It could have been --
but that I don't even think was --
I don't even think we thought about that in terms of ‑- we would
have. It would have been put in prime
time.
2849
MR.
NEUFELD: I believe in our original
application -- I say ours ‑‑ the original application ‑‑
2850
THE
CHAIRPERSON: I know you weren't there
then. It's all right.
2851
MR.
NEUFELD: -- the intent was and the
availability that we would have -- the assumption that we were working
under was that these would be faith movies that we would have purchased
primarily from American religious suppliers, not realizing that other potential
titles were available. You know, for
example, our limited movie library will include movies like "Ghandi"
coming up at the end of this month. As
well as March, we're running the miniseries "Masada," which
obviously deals with balance issues because it deals with religions other than
Christianity.
2852
Just in
relation, and I do want to address the sensitivity that the Commission has in
the assumption that we want -- or we were going to provide a Canadian issues
type of program. That is definitely our
desire. Are we able to do that yet to
the degree that we would like to? No,
absolutely not. Obviously the news
magazines do provide -- unfortunately they are American perspective, but a worldly
perspective and dig deeper into the issue than we can currently do.
2853
We have
licensed some Canadian documentaries to act as springboards into discussion and
we've used those as well. We have
started, I guess, the first step in developing our own world news and events
type of show with "Christian World News," and at this point that show
would not be described as balance. What
we're hoping and offering is obviously right now "Christian World
News" that is not available anywhere else, but it would be obviously our
hope that we would be able to develop that show over time to be more broadened
and eventually be balanced in dealing with world religions and issues
pertaining to that.
2854
It's
important, I think, to point out too that our desire in using these network
news magazines is not simply for the sake of using a network news
magazine. The branding of it as being
"Online" is what's paramount for us.
We want to brand "Online."
That is the show that we've developed, that we own.
2855
At the blink of
an eye, we're not in an incredibly strong position contractually with these
shows. We don't know if
we'll have them next fall. Those
are issues that are really outside of our hands, but this is an opportunity for
us to build a local Canadian brand really on the back of an American magazine,
and that's really what Trinity desires to do in the long run, is to develop a
whole stable of Canadian religious programming and being in the branded
information business.
2856
With the media
world changing every day, dependence on American programming is probably not a
wise long-term business model, and it's been our desire and it's been Trinity's desire
in 25 years to produce religious programming.
And in this instance we are doing that on the backs of a U.S. network
show.
2857
MR. JEFF
THIESSEN: I would just like to add to
the comments, Madam Commissioner. When
we went through our program schedule, we had several meetings where we went
into great depths, from our perspective, to ensure that we were meeting every
condition of licence. So perhaps there
might be some dialogue and so on, at least our perspective, we'd like to
have you consider at least that we were and are meeting our conditions of
licence that we understood were there.
So I just want to put on the record that we truly ‑‑
when we developed the program schedule, that we were meeting those conditions
of licence.
2858
THE
CHAIRPERSON: I don't --
please don't think that that was -- I mean, the issue from the point of the
analysis was Cancon and the balance and it may well be that what we're
counting as one thing, you're counting as another.
2859
It also,
though, does then lead to the expectation of myself and my fellow Commissioners
of what you're proposing here and the proposed schedule. Again, we could probably fall into the same trap of thinking that
the balance programming would all be Canadian when we could be wrong on
that. And I think that's what a
good lot of the issue is, is what our expectation should be in terms of the
balance programming, 50 per cent Canadian or whatever. And so maybe you can cogitate on that,
because certainly it has to do with our expectations and how we, in our own
minds, saw your schedule and what we thought of it in terms of that. So maybe in Phase IV, can you --
2860
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Yes, could we come back on
Phase IV? Because I'm
realizing that I don't think in our minds we realized that all balance
programming had to be Canadian. I think
that's something I had no idea of and it's new. But I appreciate where you're coming from so --
2861
THE CHAIRPERSON: No, I don't know whether there is a requirement that it be
Canadian. Let's put it
this way though, that I think the perception may have been that it should be
Canadian.
2862
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Yes, if we could -- because
we certainly think there's some program we want to bring in that is balanced
but it is not Canadian, so we need to work out something that is totally
agreeable. Because it is not our
intention to work outside of the expectation of the Commission in any way,
shape or form.
2863
THE CHAIRPERSON: So if you can, Mr. Reimer-Epp, provide us
with the schedule so our expectations can be set appropriately.
2864
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Just for clarification,
when you say the schedule, you mean in terms of programming that we would
intend to air or in terms of the breakdown --
2865
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Yes.
2866
MR.
REIMER-EPP: -- of balance programming
and various things of that nature?
2867
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Yes, mm-hmm.
2868
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Okay.
2869
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Then, of course ‑‑
and I'll get you off the hot seat in a few minutes so you can take a
break. Then of course, Mr. Thiessen,
there is morphing, and you and I talked a couple of years ago about morphing
and I actually have the transcript here.
And we were talking about:
... fear that you will
metamorphosize yourselves and start competing with the conventionals.
And you say, and I can give it to you, but of course you say you're not
going to morph.
If we morph into being
successful, that would be wonderful. I
would like that ...
I hope that we give the
commercial stations a real competition in some of the programming, but it won't be
because we are using Hollywood, it will be -- or if we do use Hollywood it will
be religious Hollywood because something new may happen out there.
There's more, but I'm -- so then we have people, interveners, talking
about you using U.S. mass appeal type programming, and I am fairly certain that
they're probably talking about your retro ‑‑ "Leave it
to Beaver," "Andy Griffith" ‑‑ the programming.
2870
So, Mr.
Thiessen, can you tell me what you think today on the issue of morphing?
2871
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: I guess you get those words
and they're back in your face, aren't they. They're right
out there. I read the same ones, don't use
Hollywood unless it's religious.
2872
The challenge
for us, in -- that we're struggling -- and I shouldn't say struggling -- I
think we're struggling, we're struggling with the area of -- it's
something that Tim Plett brought up, that our society is familiar and
comfortable with certain venues, with certain ways, illustrations, ways of
seeing things, and I think for me personally, I've had to go back and take a look at
what some of Hollywood has done and they've dealt with some of the very issues that most of us
in church wish we'd dealt with.
2873
I wouldn't say
they deal with them the same way; they don't come up with the same results and the same answers
all the time. But the reality is that
Hollywood in its best form, not its worst, but in its best form deals with the
very issues of life and death, with the struggle of good and evil, with the
struggle of does the best man -- I mean, I grew up with a white hat always
winning, and we understand that. So
good and evil and the aspect that --
2874
As a matter of
fact, I was just reading a review yesterday of one of the movies that's coming
out ‑‑ and it's a foreign film, I'll probably never see it out here ‑‑
but it was just talking about the terrible disaster that comes out of
unfaithfulness in marriage and the disaster that comes out of it. Very well, apparently ‑‑
the review I saw, it was a very well done movie out of Italy.
2875
So we realize
that there are programs that deal with these things, the consequences of bad
choices. Hollywood has dealt with those
better and I think that I was ‑‑ to be quite honest, some of
those ‑‑ where those issues are dealt with well and dealt with
honestly and dealt with from a perspective that we within a religious community
would say, "You know what? That
was excellent. That was excellent
story-telling. That was a parable that
Jesus might have used if he was walking here today. He might use that same story and it's told well." And when there's stories like that told, I would
say -- we would like to have the opportunity to use those stories that tell
them well.
2876
There's a lot
of things that Hollywood does and programs that come out of there that we would
never want to go to because they wouldn't feel ‑‑ when we wrote out the six
criteria there where it doesn't come out with a positive result, it's
devastating in what it ends up with.
There's no hope at the end, there's no resolution.
And this is where ‑‑ and I'd like to
defer to Tim here and to Shane as well and possibly to Jeff, but in looking at
some of the programming that we were looking at, we were -- we're living
in a time when some of the program that we see today ‑‑ and if
I just might use the word, I don't watch some of it, but like say, "Friends"
and some of the other programs, it seems as though lifestyle has no
consequence. What people do doesn't bear
any -- have any -- there's no consequence.
2877
Whereas I watch
an "Andy Griffith" program and the consequence of lying is right
there in your face. It shows up. There's a consequence for lying. It affects people's lives. It
affects your own life. And "Leave
it to Beaver" deals with the issues of relationship in a far more real
world, I think the one that we relate to.
2878
And so we see
that in some of these places, Hollywood is telling the story that we want to
tell and tells it well and very differently than a lot of the current
programming that's coming out of Hollywood is telling us. And it is for that reason that we've used
some of these types of programs, because they do fit in what we're
wanting to communicate to people.
2879
So I'm
saying ‑‑ and I guess my difficulty in -- that we face is, is
religious programming only when it's produced by a religious organization or is it
religious programming because it's dealing with the issues that life really is all
about? And the suggestion would be then
that if it's produced by a -- the PAX Network in the States, for instance, is a
religious group that are producing some phenomenal programs. We're airing some of that programming, and it's
probably being made in Hollywood or else North Hollywood, Vancouver, or maybe
it's Toronto.
2880
But in other
words, we're saying, you know, there are groups that are producing the kinds of
programs that actually deal with the issues that need to be dealt with. When we wrap things around and the advantage
or the way we've seen it is that -- I'm delighted with what Tim does in the church because
they're saying, "Here's the issues that you're seeing on television. How do you, as a faith community, deal with
that issue? Can we bring it to the
forefront? Can we bring it out and
actually examine it? Can we ask the
consequences? Is the morality of that
something that we should be dealing with in our society? Are there consequences? We watched people crawling in and out of
somebody else's bed yesterday and there was no consequence. Is that in fact true?"
2881
And those are
the things that -- our society sees these things, never asks the questions,
"Does that affect my life?"
Never asks the question. This
will destroy you if that happens to you.
But no, we don't do that. And
so by wrapping conversation, wrapping commentary around it, asking the
questions that nobody else is asking.
2882
I do hear it
from maybe an editorial in a newspaper or somebody that's doing a
movie guide thing, but I don't hear it around that particular event. Commercial television plays it as long as it's getting
a viewing audience, and they wrap it around advertising and it's on to
the next thing. If we're airing
something, we're not doing it to fill -- we're wrapping something around it to say, "This has
-- this is being -- some things are being said here that affect people's
lives. This is important for us. Did you hear what they were saying? Did you see the consequence of that?"
2883
And that's the
part that -- parents should be doing this, they're often not. Their children are watching these programs,
but nobody is there asking them the questions, giving them the commentary,
giving them an insight.
2884
And to me,
religious -- to me religious television -- I guess I don't see it
as morphing. I see it using resources,
taking resources that are there and ‑‑ maybe it's called
repackaging or springboarding, as Tim uses that word ‑‑ to use
it in such a way because it's relevant, because people are watching these
things. People -- they're going
to watch it whether we show it or somebody else, but if we can show it and get
a benefit, get a result out of it, bring change to society.
2885
We're about
wanting to help society better itself.
That's what we're all about.
We're not about wanting to -- I'm not trying to build churches across the
country. I want to help society grow in
who they are and so helping them to deal with some of the issues that I think
aren't being dealt with ‑‑ I'm preaching and I don't mean to
go there, but --
2886
THE
CHAIRPERSON: I was going to say, Mr.
Thiessen, maybe we should take a break so you can eat your words and then we'll come
back to Mr. Neufeld. We'll take
15 minutes. Thanks.
--- Upon recessing at 1456 / Suspension à 1456
--- Upon resuming at 1516 / Reprise à 1516
2887
THE
CHAIRPERSON: If we can come back to
order. I think you can remember the
question. And Mr. Neufeld, I think you
had something to add? Or Mr. Thiessen?
2888
MR.
SMITH: Yes, we remember the question,
and I thank Willard for his lead-up, his hand-off. I guess I'd also like to comment just further to what he said so
well, that the comedies that we were talking about in our retro block and you've referred to, "Leave it to Beaver" and "Andy
Griffith" and the others, those are all programs that definitely deal with
moral and ethical issues, as Willard said.
Very clearly defined and talked about within the CRTC's policy and within the criteria that we mentioned in our opening
statements. So certainly that is the
basis upon our evaluation.
2889
In
addition to those, we also go to a special effort to host those retro blocks
and we have a comedian named Leland Klassen who works with us and he develops
the scriptural context of the programs, to talk about the morality and the
ethics within the program. So we
certainly do go to a special effort to make sure that we're talking about those things and talking about the relevancy of the
issues, which is so important to us.
2890
I also
wanted to mention, and this is not specific for every television show that we
might consider, but I have on the table beside me here a number of books and
tapes, and there are study guides on a lot of these programs, Biblical study
guides because of the issues that they deal with. So if at any time you wanted to review those, they are there and
they're available and we can, I think, even make copies
available to you for those.
2891
Just
going one step further, I also wanted to draw back to our opening comments
where we made the commitment to a condition of licence that would be to invest
in Canadian content all surpluses derived from the sale of advertising during
acquired Canadian programming, and I believe that's a significant contribution that we're happy to make and would relate to programs like this.
2892
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Can you run me through the
30 minutes that are, let's say, dedicated to "Leave it to
Beaver." It starts with how many
minutes by Mr. Klassen, how much of programming, how much of advertising, sort
of in order?
2893
MR.
NEUFELD: We have been experimenting
with the format of the retro block, and when we launched the station, we had a
two-hour sustained block, that approximately half an hour of that would have
been commentary and hosting segments from Leland Klassen. Another element of the show is that with the
show he's able to get out into the community, go to different
locations and different events throughout the Fraser Valley and Greater
Vancouver area. Obviously part of our
local exposure out there as well.
2894
Recently
we have restructured the format of that show and now it is in two separate one‑hour
blocks and he does hosting segments anywhere from 30 seconds to two minutes
within those hour blocks but there are two classic shows within those
blocks. And what we do is we do take
some time from the previous show, up to six to eight minutes from the previous
show to provide for Leland's commentary within the show.
2895
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So is there then
advertising also in the block?
2896
MR.
NEUFELD: Yes, there is.
2897
THE
CHAIRPERSON: How much?
2898
MR.
NEUFELD: Normal amounts of
advertising. Currently and with our
projections, we are not to a sell-out rate, so what we've been doing is we have been taking some of the commercial time and
turning that into content. I would say
we're probably in the neighbourhood of 40 to 50 per cent
sold out in those particular shows.
2899
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So if there's 12 minutes of ad, there's six that are sold out and another six
available? Is that the concept?
2900
MR.
NEUFELD: Approximately, yes.
2901
THE
CHAIRPERSON: I wanted to go to your
definition and as you referred to, Mr. Smith, and I guess -- let me be very
clear with you. I understand what has
been said in the Vision renewals and other renewals. I'm not exactly sure that -- page 12 ‑‑
that the programming, you talk on your first one, "Raise and
specifically," on your conditions on page 12:
Raise and specifically address issues
or questions which are spiritual, moral, ethical or religious in nature.
And as I read the definition, one
which deals with a religious theme. So
the religious theme, including programs that examine or expound religious
practices and beliefs or present a religious ceremony, service or other similar
event.
2902
So the
religious theme, then, is an issue that is spiritual, moral, ethical or
religious? Is that the concept?
2903
MR.
SMITH: Yes, that's correct.
2904
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay.
2905
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Madam Chair, if I can
interject just momentarily, I'm sorry. Just
to be entirely clear, that the use of these criteria is, as Mr. Smith said in
his opening, intended to just enlighten as to how it is the programming is
evaluated. The definition has got a lot
of material packed into it and so this is a good way of sort of unpacking it a
little bit, making it more easily used.
So it's not intended to supplant the definition in any way.
2906
THE
CHAIRPERSON: I hear you. Thank you.
If we can go on, then, to closed captioning. Given that your revenues are less than the five million for
smaller television stations, what would be the impact on you if we required you
to close caption 90 per cent of your programming, beginning in year six, and
all of your news by the end of the first year?
2907
MR. JEFF
THIESSEN: We would be willing to accept
that as a condition of licence.
2908
THE
CHAIRPERSON: What are you doing, if
anything, in the line of a descriptive video?
2909
MR. JEFF
THIESSEN: The descriptive video is
something that is ‑‑ been relatively recent in terms of the
Commission's policies, and it is something we have been looking
at in terms of implementing. It's something that is show specific; some work better than others. There's some programs in prime time that we air in the Vancouver market, the Fraser
Valley area, which really, in many ways, relate very well to that and don't actually even require it. It's very much of a talk-oriented program and we feel
that would probably be served very well by those who are visually
impaired. So it's something that we
will continue to work towards, developing programs that do help facilitate
their enjoyment of television on our station.
2910
But it's hard for us right now to exactly quantify where that would go at this
point.
2911
THE
CHAIRPERSON: But in terms of equipment,
are you planning on having a SAP here if you ‑‑
2912
MR. JEFF
THIESSEN: Equipment that we do have has
the ability to do it and S-A-P or SAP is ‑‑ technologically we're capable of and now it's just a matter of implementation slowly to help
facilitate that.
2913
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Carriage. Should you be licensed, have you spoken with
the cable carrier here? It's only Shaw, isn't it? Yes,
Shaw.
2914
MR. JEFF
THIESSEN: Yes, that change happened
just relatively recently. I did
actually have a chance to speak with Mr. Ron Bell at Shaw Cablesystems, who is
in charge of the Manitoba area. He was
in town just a couple of weeks ago, actually deciding on the augmentation
between the two different systems and facilities.
2915
At this
point in time, they have not made decisions as to whether they're going to use the eastern -- in Winnipeg, there's the east and the west feed.
One is the old Shaw and what was Videon. And they're not entirely sure where they're going to use the technology of both systems. But we did come to an agreement at that time
which would facilitate both of our concerns.
We both talked about the intervention and discussed it and they're happy to do something less than channel 20, which we were happy to
say yes to, and we are willing, of course, and he was agreeable to this, to use
an impaired channel.
2916
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So you would agree to
carriage under 20 and also on an impaired channel?
2917
MR. JEFF
THIESSEN: Well, we agreed to some way
work out some kind of a -- facilitate both parties and at the time, we agreed
to 2 to 13 on an impaired channel. He
was interested in doing that. But we
did sort of work through the process of how that would be implemented and came
to a mutual understanding that there wouldn't be any real major concern on their parts to do that.
2918
And if we
so chose ‑‑ if we would choose at that time to go from 13 to
20, or 14 to 20, either because the traps would be changed or else the
impairment on some of the other channels was too strong for us, then we'd be willing to go to 14 to 20, and he was aimiable to that.
2919
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So, in so far as you are
entitled to basic carriage, for the purposes of waiving any rights, you would
be agreeable to go anywhere under channel 20?
2920
MR. JEFF
THIESSEN: Yeah, that was -- we had
agreed to.
2921
THE CHAIRPERSON: Okay.
Demand here in Winnipeg. You
have given us a poll of your supporters.
Did you do a study or a survey of non-supporters?
2922
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: Of non-supporters?
2923
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Well, I mean you did one
of supporters so --
2924
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: No, we did not. We did not do a survey, a formal survey per
se of the broad community. We did not
do that.
2925
THE
CHAIRPERSON: I'm going to have to go back to ‑‑ the retro block, I
think I'll start with.
Has there been a difference, if any, between your projected share and
the share you actually have on that spot between 5:00 and 7:00?
2926
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: Let me have Tim
respond.
2927
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Sure.
2928
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: He's doing the work on that.
2929
MR.
SMITH: I believe our share that we're currently delivering with the retro block is about a .2 rating and I'm sorry, I don't have the share, but I believe that works out to
about a one share, and that's pretty consistent with what we had originally
proposed for the daytime time period.
2930
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And what about the
evening? It's in balance, but what about the ones, the "Dateline" and
those American public affairs shows?
What are they relative to what was projected?
2931
MR.
SMITH: Again, taking a look at prime
time as a block or evening viewing as a block, we're very close to our original projections for that as well.
2932
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And what were the
projections?
2933
MR.
SMITH: I think we were talking about a
one share in the Vancouver area.
2934
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So it's a one share.
2935
MR.
SMITH: Yes.
2936
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Now, is that only the fall
2001 book that you're talking about or is it ‑‑
2937
MR.
SMITH: We have the benefit in
Vancouver, of course, of having continuous ratings so the numbers that I'm giving you are actually what is now a 21-week history of the station.
2938
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay, so it's up to date now?
2939
MR.
SMITH: Yes.
2940
THE
CHAIRPERSON: In terms of financial
impact, vis-à-vis your projections, it's nil. And in Winnipeg, do you now plan on having
the same kind of retro block?
2941
MR.
SMITH: That program is not shown in the
schedule, but we feel that that concept could work very well in Winnipeg. One of the things we haven't done to this point or one of the things we can't predict is what programs will be available to us at such time as we go
to launch the station. So there's a little bit of a question mark there as to the specifics of the
schedule. But again, it's something that seems to be fitting with our concept of religious
programming, so it's likely we would certainly try to consider it.
2942
THE
CHAIRPERSON: I want to talk to you
about the non-competition COL that you propose, and it was not to compete with
any conventional local stations for program purchases. I guess the problem I saw in that is that
the local stations are Global, CTV and Craig, but they don't negotiate so -- I mean, habitually they don't negotiate. It would be Global
in Winnipeg, CTV in Toronto and Craig in -- they would be doing it by their
networks ‑‑ or non-networks ‑‑ but they would
be doing it by their group.
2943
So are
you really saying that you would agree to a COL not to compete with any
conventional stations which have a local signal in Winnipeg for program
purchases?
2944
MR.
SMITH: What I think ‑‑
and maybe I should sort of explain it in a larger sense. Basically each year, television stations
assemble their schedule for the fall generally in the period of May and June,
perhaps a little bit earlier. What we
are saying is that we need to watch and we need to wait, in truth, until all of
the other players in the market assemble their schedules before we go and start
to put our schedule together. So the
programming that is available to us is programming that they have not been
interested in, and that's really in essence what we're trying to say.
2945
THE CHAIRPERSON: Then what I said would probably be correct?
2946
MR.
NEUFELD: I think the intent is that we
would not compete with A-Channel, Global or CKY, not the specific shows they
buy for this specific market, but for all the programming that they would have
on their schedules, whether it's bought in Toronto or Calgary or Winnipeg, we're basically saying we will not compete, nor do we feel that we can.
2947
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So it would be that you
would not compete with any conventional stations in Winnipeg -- no. You would not compete with conventional
stations who have stations in Winnipeg for program --
2948
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: That's right.
2949
THE
CHAIRPERSON: -- purchasing?
2950
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: That is correct.
2951
THE
CHAIRPERSON: And you're in agreement with that?
2952
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: Yes, we are.
2953
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay. Then there is the issue of the COL on profit
from the, say the retro block, going into Cancon production. And that's in addition to your CTD?
Everybody's nodding but nothing's going on record.
2954
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Yes, it is. That's the job of the lawyer, I think, so I'll say that.
2955
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you. I wanted to go over that carefully because
if I read it:
We will invest into Canadian content
all surpluses derived from the sale of advertising during acquired American
programming.
Does
that include, for example, the public affairs American shows? And how do we count that when you've got your commentator in there too?
I mean, I certainly wouldn't want to count the ads for the call-in show after.
2956
MR.
NEUFELD: Just to clarify, not to make
it any more complicated than it is, our commentary is basically taking the
additional time that American stations allow for commercials that we're not allowed. Most stations
will run Canadian promos and that type.
We use it as an opportunity, as a springboard into our
conversation.
2957
The
spirit of what we're saying there is that that one-hour portion of our show we would treat obviously
as the acquired American and obviously the revenues from that over and above
the expenses would go back into Canadian content.
2958
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay, so the profits
derived from advertising during the American acquired programming. Okay.
2959
Now, donation
revenues. I wanted to talk about
program-specific donations. In your
projections, you have those constant over the seven years. Can you tell me, when you're talking about
the program-specific donations, what programs are you talking about and how do
you get the donations? Sonshiny Day, is
it one of them?
2960
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Sonshiny Day. Actually we're required by the -- as a
charity, that any designated funds, funds that come in specifically, that are
delegated or that say, "Please, this goes toward this amount." It's not a large sum of money that we've got
there but in reality we find that there are programs that we will be producing,
whether it's a children's program, for instance -- the funds aren't a huge
amount where people say it goes to that.
We're a (indiscernible) group, we're required by law, but we're just
saying that these funds do come in and they will then go towards the
production, et cetera, of more of those programs. In other words, we can address it to those areas.
2961
So it's not a
large -- it isn't the hugest amount. I
think there is -- I know that page is there somewhere. Thank you, Richard. The funds are -- we will not be ‑‑
we're not really pushing money for the station itself. That has not been our primary means of ‑‑
I mean, we talked about this, that there's three revenue streams. There's the donations that come in, there's
the brokered program sales and then there's advertising time.
2962
But we won't
on air be pushing a lot of advertising or donation requirements for the station
itself. That's not where we're
going. But there will be people that
will want to support the station simply because it's doing something for them
in their community and so we're calling that program station donations for
that.
2963
Most of the
donations that will be coming in will be coming in really for "It's A New
Day," our flagship program that comes out of Winnipeg. That's where our
largest donation response is from. And
it will continue to ‑‑ we see as being a large part. And then the brokered programs will receive donations
to their headquarters, wherever that is.
2964
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So the flagship is
"It's A New Day."
2965
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: "It's A New Day" is
the flagship program, yes.
2966
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay. And in terms of program-specific donations,
are there corporate sponsors or is it just normally Mary Jones sending in $20?
2967
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: The interesting -- there are
some -- as a station develops, we're actually finding, there's one of our -- a
program producer in the Fraser Valley actually has come to us and she has a
sponsor. There's a program that she
wants to do for women, and it's an absolutely exciting idea that she's got, and
she's getting -- there's a businessman that wants to fund her. She's got a television background, she
worked in the States for a while. We've
repatriated her back to Canada, and her concept is good and she's sold the idea
to a local businessman, so obviously those donations will be program-specific
and they will enable her to do a program.
2968
Now, that's
not shown -- I mean, these are things that are just evolving at this point in
time. But we see where there are
charity ‑‑ or there are foundations that have specific areas
that they want to encourage, and actually Vicki in the back row is starting to
work in those areas of looking at foundations and groups that want to deal --
there are groups that want to help children and work with children and provide
things, and we see that's an area we've never developed but now we have an
opportunity to open that doorway, to receive funding and develop programming
that would be very specifically geared to helping fulfil the ideals of some of
these foundations.
2969
MS.
OLATUNDUN: Madam Chair, if I can just
quickly add that there are foundations I have approached. This is the first time that Trinity
Television has secured a position of donor development, a director of donor
development. And I've approached a lot
of these foundations and a lot of the matters that are close to their heart,
like children, like women, they have said that they will specifically fund
programs that further the mandate that they carry.
2970
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Native broadcasting, which
is page 307 of your application. And
you talk about working with the Manitoba Indian Cultural Education Centre, who
operates the Aboriginal Broadcast Training Initiative, and you talk about
working with them and with their students.
Can you tell me what structure there is to that?
2971
MR.
EDWARDS: I'm sorry, I'm not quite sure
I understood the question. What's the
structure of MICE?
2972
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Yes, you talk about
working with them and with the students in its training initiative. That's at page 307.
2973
MR.
EDWARDS: Yes.
2974
THE
CHAIRPERSON: I just wanted to know what
the structure is. You know, for every
student that comes out, they spend three months with you, or what?
2975
MR. EDWARDS: We would welcome them as long as they would
like to be there. They have in their
curriculum work experience and other aspects of their curriculum which allow
them and their students to go off site to do things. And I sense at times that that also relates to the individual, so
there are cases where an individual may actually go beyond their basic
curriculum to do more work experience because it's working for them and
growing, so it's certainly a loose arrangement from that perspective.
2976
From our end,
we're very happy to welcome them as much as they would like to be a part of our
organization in the production capacity, and that's just somewhat dependent
upon their curriculum, and that seems to be an evolving thing as well.
2977
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Lo, how are things
going out in Fraser Valley, and if I recall, you were the chair of the balance
committee there. How's the balance
programming going?
2978
MR. LO: Commissioner, I am very pleased to report to
you that things are going extremely well.
Since the launch of the station on September 15th, I have been receiving
lots of e-mails and telephone calls complimenting what a great job CHNU has
done.
2979
I just would
like to relate to you a personal story.
My wife works at the Mount St. Joseph Hospital in Vancouver. Most of her co-workers know that she's a
Christian, but they did not know that she's in some shape related to CHNU
through me. And a number of her
co-workers are of the south Asian background, and recently my wife told me that
one day her south Asian co-workers came to her and were really excited and
simply said, "Hey, there's this new station that we have been watching
every Saturday morning. We watch our
program." And in addition to that,
they are -- "We find many other programs that are very interesting
and we have been watching and this is our station. You should tune in and look at it yourself." So my wife was really pleased.
2980
And I can
relate to you that there are numerous stories like that over and over
again. And there have been, for
instance, some representatives from the local Muslim community who have
personally come to our station and expressed how good they felt. They actually said something like, "For
the first time in our lives, we really feel we are welcomed by the Christian
community, and it's not the same kind of experience that we have read in the
newspapers or heard on the local radio or seen on the local television station
until now."
2981
We also
happened -- well, the station happened to have been launched September 15th,
four days after the mishap in New York City four days earlier. There were some guests who were invited to
the "Online" program to take some of the phone calls and also give
their personal views as to how they see things. In many instances ‑‑ for example, there was one
fellow who was from the local Sikh community and he was actually in tears. He expressed how, through this particular
program, that he was so moved by the fact that now he feels being part of the
community and being part of the mosaic that is really welcomed by the
Christians and not like what was portrayed to be out in the marketplace. And there were also Muslim representatives
who came on our program and expressed the same thing.
2982
We also have
this programming balance monitoring system in place where we track every
comment that is made, every phone call that's come in, and there are all kinds
of comments, and I have a copy of it from September the 17th until January 31st
that was e-mailed to me yesterday. I
had that review on an ongoing basis, but looking at all the comments, and they
were really, really positive.
2983
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. Lo. I have no more questions. I don't -- Commissioner Cardozo? Sorry, gentlemen and Ms. Olatundun.
2984
MS.
OLATUNDUN: Olatundun, that's correct.
2985
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Thanks very much. I just wanted to pursue a few areas, some of
which Commissioner Cram had talked to you about, and I'm still not clear on
these issues. I wanted a little more
information on them.
2986
On the
balance programming, you talked about the seven and a half and the two and a
half, do I understand that the two and a half would be prepared, produced by
non-Christian, faith-specific groups?
2987
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: That's correct.
2988
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Mostly locally?
2989
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: Right. When we talked about this in Vancouver, I
think the intent, and we understood this, is that there's a portion of the
balance program that Trinity needs to be responsible for to ensure that the
balance gets in from all areas. But
then we don't want to be responsible for the faith-specific, otherwise the
intent, the suggestion might be that we would influence it in some obscure way.
2990
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Okay. And would
those groups be, for example, the ones who will be intervening tomorrow in
support of your application? There are
groups representing the Hindu, Muslim and Jewish faiths? Will it be those groups specifically or
others, do you know?
2991
MR. EDWARDS: It
would include some of those groups. The
groups that we've looked at that would be doing programming at this
time are groups that are on file with the Commission as having signed,
essentially, letters of intent or contracts that suggest their interest in
producing programs. Some of those
groups have chosen to intervene in an appearing capacity tomorrow.
2992
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Okay. Some of them
have talked about, I guess, either they have partnered with you before or their
interest in partnering. Does that refer
to programming?
2993
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: In the past, we produced a
program, a local interest program on another channel, other than our flagship
program that aired on the A-Channel, and it gave us an opportunity to, even
though the intent was not to be a particularly religious program, it ended up
being ‑‑ I guess it happens in our building. But anyway, it ended up being that way a
good chunk of the time. And it provided an opportunity
for us to get to know the non-Christian community as well as the Christian
community, but we developed a relationship with the Muslim community, with the
Hindu.
2994
I don't think there was a community that didn't somewhere have some input, were guests on the program. Talked about their days of worship, et
cetera. And it turned out to be an
extremely positive -- I mean, we were surprised how positive, how
wonderful it turned out to be. And when
Richard went to -- I mean, now there were people that knew who we were, had
been in our building, had worked with us on programs. They're quite confident in wanting to work with us in the
new programs.
2995
I had a
little shock. We talked to one of the
Jewish interveners and she was just saying ‑‑ mentioning about
the fact that there were some things that they would just love to have on their
program, and we said, "Well, we'll get the facilities, we've got cameras and so on. Would you like to tape those things and get
them ready should we be doing a program this fall?" They've got some people coming in the next
month. We said, you know, "Let us
do that for you. We can put it in the
can for you."
2996
And then
she mentioned one of our hosts that had been hosting the previous -- that
program. She said, "Well, can he
come and be the host and interview those people for us, because he interviews
so well." And I thought, well,
that doesn't quite fit our mandate that it has to be done by
them, so we're struggling with how do we provide them with a host,
because they're very comfortable using our people.
2997
So this
is a struggle, pardon me, Commissioner, that we're wondering sometimes. We want
to help them, but sometimes we may actually help them by giving them some
personnel that actually enable them. I
don't know, but that's something we're working through.
2998
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Based on your experience in
Vancouver, and maybe Mr. Lo can tell us, have you assisted or have you
considered assisting groups in terms of training them with television skills?
2999
MR.
LO: We have had some ongoing
discussions in that particular regard, and as a matter of fact, the
representative for the Sikh community, for example, has recently approached
myself and suggested that when this particular hearing here in Winnipeg is
completed, that when I go back to Vancouver, that we'll sit down and look at an event that they would look forward to hosting
and raise money from the Sikh community to provide their own training program,
utilizing some of our resources.
3000
The
resources that I refer to are people, for example, who are instructors at the
B.C. Institute of Technology and they are teaching television production and
everything to do with television, and they are able to provide mentoring and
also training.
3001
We also,
internally, as part of the production team under the leadership of Oliver
Eichel, who also still teaches in the evening at BCIT, to allow for some of the
BCIT students, regardless of their particular background, but actually more
recently there has been some inquiries from students of so-called visible
minority backgrounds, to come and spend, for example, two weeks at our studio
to learn how to do production. And so
we are working in many different ways.
3002
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: In terms of the non-Christian
groups, have you thought about Aboriginal spirituality? Of course, many Aboriginal people are
Christians but many are not and have Aboriginal spirituality which predates the
Christian presence in North America.
3003
MR.
EDWARDS: Absolutely. Mary Richard, who is a fairly well-known
name in the Winnipeg community, and the Thunderbird House have a contract with
us as well that we filed as just one of the examples of the kinds of programs
and the kinds of things that can be done.
Very much -- Winnipeg would not be -- it wouldn't be fulfilled if we weren't involving the Aboriginal community --
3004
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Exactly.
3005
MR.
EDWARDS: -- in programming in that
regard.
3006
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Now, in seven and a half
hours, which is also balance programming, that isn't produced by other faith groups?
That's this other program you've been talking about?
3007
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: That's correct.
3008
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Okay. In terms of your definition of balance, do
you consider it to be a balance of different faiths or a balance of different
views, or can you do both?
3009
If I can
give you an example. If you take a
certain issue, and let's take a non-charged one like sponsorship, for --
censorship. Okay? Supposing there is a view held among one
faith, you could find people of five different faiths who hold the same
viewpoint.
3010
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: Right.
3011
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Do you consider that balance?
3012
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: When we were ‑‑
we would not consider that balanced.
Balance is when there are perspectives.
Even within one faith community you can have some pretty divergent
perspectives, and balance would be that over a period of time we would reflect
the broader perspective. It's amazing how in some areas we're very
polarized, even within all faiths, on some of these very hot issues. And we have committed ourselves to providing
an alternative viewpoint outside of that, so that people who view the program
will hear another perspective.
3013
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Okay. Now, on the matter of this seven and a half
hour balance program, just going back to the definition that Madam Chair read
earlier about what constitutes a religious program. I look at a number of things on TV right now, and by generous
definition, they could fit your service.
Take the blockbuster "ER", which is in an emergency room. It's always about
life and death and there are very clever stories where they involve family
relationships and all sorts of complicated issues, which certainly do deal with
issues of morals and ethics and consequences.
3014
I look at
a program like "Law and Order" or to take a Canadian program,
"Blue Murder." All these
programs are dealing with issues of consequences, some maybe more, some maybe
less on the moral-ethical scale.
3015
You could
even take a program like "Friends" and bookend it with somebody
talking about it and saying, "Look, this is not what you should do,"
and it meets the definition. So I'm just wondering, have we got a gaping hole in the policy that allows
you to basically put anything in and call it religious programming? Or can you give us something that you could
more tightly define?
3016
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: I understand your
concern and that's our concern as well. We feel that that's only fair to have that. And Tim, I know that you've been --
these are things that we're questioning when we go to looking at programs and
looking at what's available, this is a major concern. I'll let you
start on that.
3017
MR.
SMITH: Thank you. You mentioned "Friends" as an
example and certainly a hugely popular program. And although there are morals and ethics, I suppose, that come
into it, I think one of the things that we talked about in our own criteria was
constructive and positive, and I don't know that all
of the images presented in that really fit that. So I don't think it's the type of
program that we would go after for that reason.
3018
"ER" ‑‑
and there are many moral and ethical issues, certainly, that fall into the
medical profession for sure. But again,
I don't believe it fits our criteria based on the same
issue, that there are many not so constructive images and themes within the
program.
3019
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: So your dividing line is what
you'd call a constructive image? I'll give you an example. In the last week or two there was a show where one of the
doctors, whose name I forget, his mother, who had left him as a child at the
time when his brother was dying of leukaemia, came back into his life because
she had now befriended another boy who was dying of leukaemia, who was an
orphan, was in a foster home. So she'd
sort of had a rough life, having left the family, but was now coming back and
experiencing and really befriending this child, and this child who had
leukaemia sort of come back for the second time and in a more deadly form was
saying, "This time it's better because I've got her beside me." So
that is a very, you know --
3020
UNIDENTIFIED
SPEAKER: It's a very spiritual theme.
3021
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: It's a very spiritual theme. It
would fit your service, from what I would look.
3022
MR.
SMITH: Certainly that storyline,
specifically, I think could be -- could fit our own criteria, but I guess what
I'm looking at is the entirety of the program, which may
not.
3023
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: So it's the presence of -- so what was the term you said? Not --
3024
MR.
SMITH: I said constructive and
positive, and I'm drawing on that.
3025
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: So in order to be constructive
and positive, you also want to see the opposite of that so that it's clear what is positive and constructive, isn't it? It's the contrast that highlights or makes the point. It doesn't mean you have to show all the bad stuff. You don't have to show a program about drug pushers to talk
about the evils of drugs all the time.
But you see, I'm not clear on what basis you would exclude that
program. I'm not suggesting you should have it in your show necessarily, but how do
we as a regulator say yeah, that fits or that doesn't fit religious programming?
3026
MR.
NEUFELD: Just if I could offer a
comment on that. I think where a lot of
this -- where the essence of it is for us is that our own criteria states that
it needs to be substantially consistent with the criteria. In your example of "ER" although
that single episode could be argued that It would have spiritual or moral or
ethical significance, I doubt, if we would evaluate "ER" as a series,
we would find the content of it to be substantially consistent with our
criteria, although there might be a few exceptions.
3027
Similarly,
if you look at a retro block of programming, for example, "Andy
Griffith" and "The Beverly Hillbillies," these series, on a
regular basis, because they were created in a different time and different
place where Biblical morals and ethics were basically expressed on television
on a regular basis, I think as a result of that you can see actual Bible
studies being developed on that because of the consistency of the series. I would argue that it's not likely that "ER" would have an accompanying Bible study
at any point soon.
3028
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: You never know.
3029
MR.
NEUFELD: It would be a stretch for
me. Likewise, I would say that another
more modern show that we are ‑‑ "Touched by an
Angel," for example. Obviously we
would determine that as being a religious show simply because the characters
themselves are angels and they're relating people back to divinity. It's definitely
not our intent in any way to promote secular programming for the sake of
promoting secular programming. We do
seek out shows that have a substantial consistency with our criteria.
3030
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: I just want to test something
with you and I'm just thinking this out loud. It's not something
we've thought about. But one of the
things we do in areas where there are these grey areas is to have committees
that can judge these things. You're familiar with the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council. Recently with Global and CTV, we've asked them to set up mechanisms to look at issues of media, not
concentration but the relations between their television and print media. Would it be possible for you to have some
kind of committee of outsiders who could make that -- like, if people
complained about it, rather than us having to review programs, which we don't
want to get into that kind of nitty gritty usually, is it possible for you to
think about -- and I'm not saying we'll do this. I mean, I'm just throwing this out as an idea, as a way to take this policy or our
policy, what you talked about on page 12 and 13?
3031
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: Mm-hmm.
3032
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Because even with all this
stuff, there will always be programs which --
3033
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: I like that. I mean, I'm open to that possibility of considering that, you know, that idea of a
group of people that are outside of my world that --
3034
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: And what ‑‑
that usually works, it's complaint based.
3035
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: Okay.
3036
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: So it's not every show and you do your work as you go along.
3037
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: Yes.
3038
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: But if somebody else --
3039
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: If there's a complaint that comes in, it would then be brought to this panel and
they would then assess or evaluate whether --
3040
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: And then explain what ‑‑
give you reasons for what they think.
3041
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: Sure.
3042
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: And then you would abide
by ‑‑ if they said no, this was outside, you would say okay,
we'll take that off.
3043
MR.
NEUFELD: Just for clarification, are
you seeing this as being a panel or a committee of people with religious
background or theological training to be able to evaluate it in that context?
3044
MR.
REIMER-EPP: If I might interject just
for a moment. Perhaps this would be
something that would be appropriate for us to bring back to you again tomorrow
morning.
3045
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Sure.
3046
MR.
REIMER-EPP: And maybe in the form of a
proposal, which would be helpful.
3047
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Or if there's anything else you can think of that would help us deal with the
question, because the Religious Policy is a new policy. We're all, you and
us, are feeling our way through it and like any other policy, even the old
ones, there are always complaints, but certainly new ones, and we've got to find a way to work at it.
3048
MR.
REIMER-EPP: I think we'd be happy to work that through a little bit and to come back to it in
Phase IV.
3049
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Lastly on the theme of the
newness of the policy, you're aware that for a while the Commission tended to be
resistant to licensing single-faith services.
We now have licensed CTS and a representative is here today, CGIL and
various religious radio stations. Do
you sense that there's beginning to be an industry or a community of
networks, that you can grow together, share material, content and that kind of
stuff?
3050
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: As a matter of fact,
I attended a seminar in Ontario last spring and there was a rep from CTS there
that was ‑‑ one of Mr. Mainse's sons was there, I was there.
And I guess we were the television side, but then there was the whole
radio side there as well. And that
group is going to be meeting again this spring and we found that ‑‑
in the past, we'd wanted to do these things and there wasn't the -- as a programmer, it's difficult to
do. As broadcasters, there's a different dynamic that comes into it, and we found that there were a
lot of things that we could actually share.
There were common concerns, common interests, and I look forward to
that. I believe that that is -- we're an emerging group of people and the area of working together, it's something we've desired to do, but there's a will to do it and I think opportunities are growing in that area.
3051
There are
some common areas between the radio and television. I mean, there's a lot of -- because the communities we're talking to in many ways are the same communities and so we're looking forward to -- I personally am looking forward to this
relationship growing.
3052
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: We were hearing yesterday from
one of the applicants in radio, there's a paucity of
music, of Christian music.
3053
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: Yes.
3054
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: You know, I know various
Christian musicians who'd love to get their stuff out there and I think, you
know, if people spread that word, there's a lot of music out there that can be made and shared and --
3055
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: As a matter of ‑‑
3056
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: So you can meet the Canadian
content regulations, but indeed grow the industry and the people who want to
get on air.
3057
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: Some of the musicians
that we've gotten to know that are now getting airtime in
Winnipeg, for instance, with the stations that we have out here, I mean, there's a delight that's going on.
There's clearly something that's developing. And we made an
application for into one of the satellite channels, which didn't get approved, but that was okay.
3058
But we
will be doing a lot -- it's not okay, but -- what did I say? What did I say?
3059
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: We'll take the first part of what you said on the record.
3060
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: But we're working on that segment within the station. We're showing a two-hour block in the afternoons, and
that means -- we're working at developing -- I mean, we're taping groups now. We're preparing for that, and it's exciting to
see people coming in. We had a group in
from Vancouver last -- well, two groups from Vancouver last week and we taped
songs with them. It isn't as exciting as the MTV type.
We don't have the resources to throw into it. But we are featuring music that is
Canadian-grown music and the radio stations are doing the same.
3061
There's a neat thing between -- I'm selling
again, but between radio and television because radio creates a market to the
ears, and people want to see the artists.
There's something about it, and I think there is a synergy
that grows in some of these areas, particularly for music. The music venue is one of those it works
well in. So we look forward to that
possibility of working with the local Christian radio stations.
3062
COMMISSIONER
CARDOZO: Okay, thanks very much for
that. Thank you, Madam Chair.
3063
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Commissioner Williams?
3064
COMMISSIONER
WILLIAMS: Good afternoon, panel. The Conference Board of Canada issued a
report and a bit of a forecast on Canada, and Winnipeg in particular, and they
see a few storm clouds on the horizon from a financial point of view. Since last year, the economy has stepped
backwards, shedding 1,700 jobs in the second quarter of 2001 and then negating
any of the gains made earlier in the year.
Service sector (indiscernible) fell to weakness, and transportation,
wholesale, resale, all sectors went down.
3065
I guess
one of their fears is if the U.S. economy enters a prolonged slowdown and it's ‑‑ if you've been reading
the papers, the slowdown could be starting now, that Winnipeg's export-based manufacturing industries will suffer and that's the largest employer in Winnipeg.
3066
So
balancing that information with the claims by two of the incumbents in the
marketplace, Craig and Global, who have been experiencing a declining market
for the past few years, and they suggest the market is not healthy and cannot
support another competitor. I'm going to give you an opportunity to respond to that. I'm just going to
give you a little bit more information and then the floor is yours.
3067
I look at
your five-year projected financial projections, at the five-year mark, where
you're having a PBIT, or profit before interest and tax of
23 per cent, which is 230 times larger than that enjoyed by Craig or Global
today. Their PBITs are minus 1 per
cent.
3068
I see
over your licence period, from the local sales, you've projected to take $4 million, not counting donations, which is
another 3 million, which may have some effect. And then plus we're probably going to license a radio station, which is
going to affect the advertising marketplace as well.
3069
So
hearing all that gloomy financial and economic information, can you please
explain to us why should we be licensing a television station at this time.
3070
MR.
WILLARD THIESSEN: I'll turn this over to some of the others in just a moment. But as I mentioned, there really are three
streams of revenue that are all significant, and advertising sales is
definitely an important part of this.
Brokered programming will be an important part, we see that. But donations is probably the one kind of
the unknown, or it's -- I shouldn't say unknown. For us, it's the most known commodity, and yet it wouldn't be there for any of the commercial ventures that are out there.
3071
Our
organization has been funded by donations for 25 years and by the support and
the partnership that we've received from the community, and Manitoba continues
to be our primary -- not our primary ‑‑ our largest donation
base. Even though we've been in other parts of the country for many, many years -- in the
Edmonton area, we've been there for 18 years, and Vancouver, I guess,
for probably about 12 or 14 and so on, Manitoba continues to be our strongest
support base. The people of this
province have come behind us again and again.
3072
They have
built our production facility that we have here. I mean, the majority of that money has come from Manitobans, and
we aren't projecting that we'll want to fund this by donations, but if push came to shove, what we
have found is that the donation base is there to make up the difference. It happens again and again. So that's kind of our fallback position.
3073
But we
believe that there is room and I'm going to let Shane respond to this, that there's room in the marketplace for -- there is advertising out there that
might be a little different from maybe where Craig and Global are at.
3074
MR.
NEUFELD: Thanks, Willard. I can appreciate your question, and as a
percentage, I agree that 23 per cent looks pretty impressive as far as a
return, and I'm sure if A-Channel or Global were performing at that
level, their shareholders would be quite excited. Our financial model is quite a bit more modest than theirs, so I
think the percentage is slightly misleading.
3075
In
regards to the appetite of the market or the ability of the market to sustain
us, as we noted in our application, we are anticipating on creating a lot of
new advertisers. And again, listening
to the earlier radio applicants, many of them do cite a 13 per cent increase
last year on their revenues, which I think is encouraging that the market is
strong. And again, our model, because
we're a niche broadcaster, I think that we will be
attracting viewers who, to varying degrees, don't watch traditional television, haven't been served well by it, generating new viewers that probably haven't been there before, for local broadcasters.
3076
And in
saying that, I also believe that there's a demand for advertising from businesses out there who share the
same belief and want to support a religious service that would share their
values. And again, our unit costs are
not comparable to what A‑Channel's or Global's would be. We're talking a $20 unit cost for a
30-second commercial in fringe and $50 in prime, which would be appealing to a
lot of smaller retailers and especially rural retailers which are not being
served by the bigger television players in the market simply because it's not
affordable for them.
3077
My history at
CHMI, I've see that happen where, when ratings are lower and the unit rates are
more affordable for rural and smaller advertisers, there's more of them, and as
soon as the ratings go up and the rates go up, either those advertisers have to
graduate or they're simply not able to afford television anymore. So I feel quite confident that, tying in with
the experience at CHVN has had as well, of generating new audience, radio
audience and new advertisers, that we'll be able to fulfil those financial
goals of ours.
3078
Again, to
quote Global's intervention, which I disagree with the level of impact that
they cited, by year seven, it would be 3.16 per cent, I believe, is the number
that they used, which, even using that as a worst case scenario as an impact to
other television stations, that would be slightly more than 1 per cent by the
end of year seven effect on their revenue, which I still would argue that is
negligible and not an impact at all. I
think we will actually, rather than growing the pie ‑‑ which
is quite often the argument that a new player will come and say, well, we'll
grow the pie ‑‑ I think we'll actually be creating our own
pie. We are highly focused and a very
niche broadcaster and I think the impact that the interveners are saying I
think is overstated.
3079
MR. WILLARD
THIESSEN: If I could just add
something. This is just ‑‑
a friend of mine who runs a major business here in the city that exports more
to the States, even though they're a major player in Canada, it's KitchenCraft,
have never used television in their advertising. And they happen to be half a block away from our studios in Surrey,
and I approached them and I said -- and he is a supporter of the program. But I approached him and said, "Why
aren't you using television?" He
said, "Well, we've never thought of it." Nobody's been able to sell them on television. Well, we're playing some of their ads on the
station in the Fraser Valley now.
3080
And there's a
number of industries, in the midst of all the gloom that the Manitoba Economic
Council talked about, it's amazing how many of the players that I know in the
local marketplace that have never been busier, and I know that that's not all
over, but there are people that are doing well. The Interlake is very strong.
And the amazing thing, it's amazing how many of these are faith
community -- or people of strong faith.
Those communities seem to be doing well in the midst of the economic
slowdown and I have no explanation for that except divine intervention.
3081
I'm just
saying ‑‑ but that's the community that we'll be working with
and I see a real growth in those areas as far as people getting involved,
simply because they'll want to support a program. Even though they may not economically say it's going to sell a
lot of product immediately, but I think in the long run we'll develop a
marketplace.
3082
MR.
NEUFELD: And I think historically
Manitoba has never been a boom or bust type of market. It's pretty steady and pretty consistent,
and I think there's been strong retail confidence or consumer confidence in the
last quarter of this year despite the downturns; especially in eastern Canada,
I think, is far more severe.
3083
Likewise, I think
there's huge opportunity for us with our advertising approach, especially in
southern Manitoba, smaller communities.
Communities such as Steinback, which have a rich religious heritage that
are and have been very supportive of religious programming. I think we will see and be able to meet our
very conservative estimates by tapping into those communities.
3084
COMMISSIONER
WILLIAMS: These very conservative
estimates that you speak of, at the year five level, you're similar in size
from a revenue point of view as what Global and NCTV enjoy today and almost
twice what Craig enjoys today. Your
projected revenue in year five is 13 -- anyway, you know your projected revenue
better than I do; it's your revenue.
3085
MR.
NEUFELD: Our projected revenues, I
think, are far less than Global or A-Channel.
What you might be referring to is profitability. I'm not sure. And it's interesting, in Craig's application for a Toronto
station, they did cite that the Commission shouldn't be ‑‑ or
they shouldn't be concerned with necessarily a station's inability to
manage. And you know, I -- the troubles
that A-Channel or Global may be having now, I can't explain nor would I even
attempt to explain here.
3086
All I can say
is they're much bigger players. Global
is a huge, diversified, multimedia international company and I would find it
hard to believe that a non-profit religious organization would have a negative
impact on their business operations in any way. I think they are fully capable of doing whatever is necessary on
a management level to turn around their profitability and I would say similar
is the case with A-Channel, probably to a less degree, but they are a very
diverse company now, ever growing, and I have every confidence that they will
adjust their operations and operating expenses to become much more profitable
in the future.
3087
COMMISSIONER
WILLIAMS: Okay, I think that's all of
my questions. You understand the
difficulty we have, because part of our responsibility is assuring some form of
economic well-being. If stations are
struggling, to bring new players into the marketplace might not seem to be the
most prudent thing at this time. But
I've heard your answers and your arguments have countered that, and thank you
very much.
3088
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Counsel?
3089
LEGAL
COUNSEL: I just want to pick up on a
couple of things here and there if I may.
I'll start with, if you don't mind, your written presentation that you
presented earlier to the Commissioners, and I'm just looking at the proposed
condition of licence at page 10 to start with.
That's the investment into Canadian content, all surpluses derived from
the sale of advertising. I just
wondered, if the Commission wanted to make that a condition of licence, do you
have any suggestions or recommendations as to how the Commission might monitor
that?
3090
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Without saying how it is
that the Commission might choose to do that, we would be prepared to first of
all propose the specific ways in which that could be monitored, but also to
report on exactly what all of the revenues and expenses were, attributing them
directly. It's a report that would not
be particularly difficult to make, so we would be prepared to do that.
3091
LEGAL
COUNSEL: Yes, that's what I was
thinking. There would have to be some
sort of associated reporting requirement that would capture what you're
proposing.
3092
MR.
REIMER-EPP: We certainly would be
prepared to do that, yes.
3093
LEGAL
COUNSEL: What do you mean exactly by do
that?
3094
MR.
REIMER-EPP: To first of all generate a
report which would satisfy the Commission staff that it was providing the
information needed to evaluate this, and then to provide it on a regular,
ongoing basis.
3095
LEGAL
COUNSEL: Right. So obviously what we're dealing with is if
the Commission wanted to impose as a condition of licence, it would be some
associated requirement to generate reports that would generate this
information.
3096
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Understood, yes.
3097
LEGAL
COUNSEL: A similar question with page
11, same condition of licence. A
similar condition of licence. How could
we monitor that? Other than obviously
on a complaints basis? Is there any
other way other than complaints to monitor that?
3098
MR.
REIMER-EPP: I was going directly
there. I think a complaints basis would
likely cover this one quite adequately.
Existing broadcasters in this market would, I'm sure, take note of this
type of condition relatively quickly, and should it arise, I have no doubt that
they would find ways to bring it to our attention.
3099
LEGAL
COUNSEL: All right. Thank you.
Then the condition at page 12 and 13, and the obvious, maybe humorous
question would be, are those ands or ors?
3100
MR.
REIMER-EPP: They are ‑‑
would probably be best described as ors, because certainly they're not all --
it's not possible to do them all at the same time. However, they're not -- it's not necessarily that just one of
these criteria would be sufficient.
What we would be prepared to commit to by way of condition of licence is
to actually apply these criteria and not to necessarily say that it has to meet
one or two or any certain number of them.
3101
There is, I
would suggest, an element of communicating good faith by putting this type of
criteria forward. They cannot be
exhaustive. Only the definition in the
policy can be exhaustive. This is more
along the lines of explaining the process to some extent.
3102
So where it's
not possible to be both an issue show and a drama at the same time, it may be a
group of these which would be applicable.
So probably the or is the most accurate, but even that may limit the
applicability. There may be some cases
in which it's many of these in evaluating a specific program.
3103
LEGAL
COUNSEL: Obviously I'm just trying to
give the Commission the option of imposing it a condition of licence if it so
chooses.
3104
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Yes.
3105
LEGAL
COUNSEL: And make it as monitorable as
possible, so that's the focus of my question.
3106
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Yes, we certainly could for
any program on our schedule, prepare a detailed analysis which would show how
it relates to these six criteria, and so for any given program, it would be
quite straightforward to report on this.
3107
In terms of
saying that it only has to meet one or two or all of the criteria, it becomes a
little more difficult in that way. So
in terms of reporting and monitoring, I believe that it would be easily done,
to actually put together reports which go on a program by program basis.
3108
LEGAL
COUNSEL: Oh, I see, so on an inquiry
basis or whatever, you would say, "Yes, we aired this program because it
met criteria 1, 3 and 5," or something?
3109
MR. REIMER-EPP: Yes, that's -- yes.
3110
LEGAL
COUNSEL: Thank you. If I can go for a minute, and I'm thinking
of the conversation that you had a little earlier with Commissioner Cram on the
80 per cent commitment that was reflected in the licensing decision 2000-218
for Fraser Valley, and you said that that 80 per cent commitment was corrected
or amended at some period of time and that what Fraser Valley is required to
live to are the 60/50 requirements that are in the Regulations. That's correct so far?
3111
MR.
REIMER-EPP: That's correct so far, yes.
3112
LEGAL
COUNSEL: Can you say where and when and
in what context that 80 per cent commitment was corrected or amended?
3113
MR.
REIMER-EPP: I can provide the decision
number. I don't have it with me
unfortunately, as I said, but it was corrected by way, I believe, of a phone
call to the Winnipeg office, because it was a misunderstanding of what had been
presented and the transcript was quite clear that the commitment was actually
60/50. So we just addressed that to
Commission staff and an amendment of the decision was released.
3114
LEGAL
COUNSEL: So perhaps in Phase III, when
you come back, you could just provide that detail for the record so that we
have it in front of us.
3115
MR.
REIMER-EPP: I would be very happy to do
that, yes.
3116
LEGAL COUNSEL: Further, I believe you're going to provide a
schedule, I think, in Phase III, the final phase, with an indication of what
you're intending to air and I think what you are airing in Fraser Valley? I think you've committed to Commissioner
Cram to that effect?
3117
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Just to reiterate my
understanding of what we're providing, it would be an analysis of what is being
counted by the station as balance programming.
3118
LEGAL
COUNSEL: In so doing, can you identify
what is counted as balance, what is counted as Canadian and what is counted as
non-Canadian?
3119
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Certainly, yes.
3120
LEGAL
COUNSEL: And can that be for both the
projected schedule here and for Fraser Valley?
3121
MR.
REIMER-EPP: I think we can do that by
tomorrow. Can we? Yes, we can do that.
3122
LEGAL
COUNSEL: Thank you very much. I believe in responding to Commissioner
Cardozo, Mr. Lo, in talking about the Fraser Valley station, talked about the
program balance monitoring system, and I just wondered if we could have a
further description of what that is.
3123
MR. LO: What that is is we have, in addition to
what's laid down in our broadcast policy manual, where it outlines the
monitoring mechanism in the form of the director of programming balance, as
well as the programming balance committee.
3124
We have
implemented a spreadsheet which the production assistant will keep track of
every phone call that comes in during the on-line program that addresses or
speaks to the specific issues that have been raised, and our producers and the
production team and myself, as well as members of the programming balance
committee would have the opportunity to look at that spreadsheet, look at the
issues, and if all the views that have been expressed come from one particular
perspective, our job has been to go out to the community to seek other points
of view in the form of inviting guests to come on to the program to speak to
those issues and also the program host would invite callers to call in to
express their views.
3125
So
specifically, for example, when one particular viewer called in and expressed
that he was from the Muslim faith, we simply issue a call ‑‑
and this was what took place ‑‑ somebody else phoned in and
expressed her viewpoint and subsequently she has phoned in several times and
call herself, "I'm your resident atheist." So it's that kind of monitoring that we have in place, to keep
track of how we're doing over a period of time, a reasonable period of time,
whether in fact the question of balance is addressed, and in fact we have
complied with that.
3126
LEGAL
COUNSEL: Did you want to add anything
to that?
3127
MR.
REIMER-EPP: If I may, the basic system
is as described in our application for the station in the Fraser Valley so in
terms of the monitoring system and the policy manual that Mr. Lo spoke of,
those are on the public record. Some of
the more specific things, ways in which that's being literally implemented day to day are, I think, what he was
describing as the systems. So I'm not sure if that fully answers your question.
3128
LEGAL
COUNSEL: Obviously there'd be a similar system put in place for Winnipeg?
3129
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Yes, for sure.
3130
LEGAL
COUNSEL: And similarly, I take it the
intent of the system is to make adjustments to programming as necessary.
3131
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Yes.
3132
LEGAL
COUNSEL: Is that correct?
3133
MR.
REIMER-EPP: That's correct.
3134
LEGAL
COUNSEL: Thank you. Finally, just one area I'm not too sure I quite fully understand. I understand from a response given earlier that movies can be
part of balance programming?
3135
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Yes.
3136
LEGAL
COUNSEL: Now, is that included in or
over and above ‑‑ let's start with
the 18 hours of balance programming to be provided each week.
3137
MR.
REIMER-EPP: Where the -- and I'll let the programming people jump in on this, but it would -- where it's appropriate, it would be included.
3138
MR.
NEUFELD: On the proposed CITT schedule,
the faith movies that we have indicated at the time of the development of that
schedule, that was not anticipated that those be balanced. However, in the reality at CHNU, some of our
movies are balanced there, but we're not proposing balance movies at this point for
CITT.
3139
LEGAL
COUNSEL: I guess what I'm trying to sort out in my own mind is you could theoretically, you
know, use up the whole of the balance with movies, and can there be any sort of
limit on how much of the balance requirement or condition, assuming it is made
a condition, can be used up by movies.
Can there be any limit on that?
3140
MR.
NEUFELD: I believe we're getting back as far as a percentage of which would be Canadian and
which would not, and reality is that 95 per cent of the movies that we'd be able to acquire would be American, so I think it would fall into
that guideline as well. But yes, we
could limit that.
3141
LEGAL
COUNSEL: Can it be, in terms of a
quantity, vis-à-vis the balance, or does it have to be (inaudible -- off
microphone) because of the Canadian content requirement? Within the 18 hours, can you say of those 18
hours, no more than, say, four hours per week can be movies, just to take an
example?
3142
MR.
NEUFELD: Yes, we could put those limits
in place. My only point was, is that in
general the Canadian content rules would probably address that concern.
3143
MR.
REIMER-EPP: If I may just add on that
-- sorry, Madam Chair.
3144
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Didn't I just hear you, though, say, Mr. Neufeld, that for the purposes of
this application, you will not be including any of the faith movies in your 18
hours? Did I not hear that?
3145
MR.
NEUFELD: That's correct. As proposed, those
movies are planned to be faith-specific as far as being Christian, yes.
3146
THE
CHAIRPERSON: So then, counsel, if I
understand that right, then the 18 hours of balance programming will not
include any movies.
3147
LEGAL
COUNSEL: And you're agreeable to that; is that correct?
3148
MR.
NEUFELD: Yes.
3149
LEGAL
COUNSEL: Thank you. Thank you, Madam Chair.
3150
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Sorry to be the
translator.
3151
LEGAL
COUNSEL: Thank you, Madam Chair, that
concludes the questions that I had.
3152
THE
CHAIRPERSON: Well, thank you, panel and
we will now adjourn until tomorrow morning at, why don't we make it nine o'clock, because I think we can finish by starting at
nine o'clock. Thank
you very much.
--- Whereupon the hearing
adjourned at 1635, to resume on Thursday, February 7, 2002, at 0900 / L'audience
est ajournée à 1635, pour reprendre le jeudi 7 février 2002 à 0830
- Date de modification :