Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies): 8662-B54-201009051

Application to review and vary of Decision 2010-255

2010-10-28 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-802 Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada – Application to review and vary Telecom Decision 2010-255 concerning usage-based billing for Gateway Access Services
File number: 8662-B54-201009051

2011-04-19 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Revisions of the pages issued on 24 November 2010.
Document: 1561564.zip - 40KB

2010-11-24 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: ISSUED PAGES as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-802 for Bell Aliant (Atlantic).
Document: 1465517.doc - 91KB

2010-11-24 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: ISSUED PAGES as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-802 for Bell Aliant (Central) and Bell Canada.
Document: 1465501.zip - 84KB

2010-07-09 – Commission Letter
Description:  Letter addressed to Bell Aliant and Bell Canada – Re: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada – Application to review and vary Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-255

2010-07-08 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of comments filed on 28 June 2010 by Acanac Inc. and Managed Network Systems Inc. (collectively, Acanac and MNSI), the British Columbia Broadband Association (BCBA), the Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP), Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel), the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP), Execulink Telecom Inc. (Execulink), MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream), Accelerated Connections Inc., EGATE Networks Inc. and TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (collectively, TekSavvy et al.) and Vaxination Informatique (Vaxination) regarding an application (the Application) filed by the Companies on 28 May 2010 to review and vary Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-255.
Document: 1415210.zip - 186KO

2010-06-28 - The British Columbia Broadband Association
Description: The British Columbia Broadband Association (BCBA) is a group of telecommunications service providers, equipment suppliers and infrastructure builders throughout all regions of British Columbia.

2010-06-28 -  Vaxination Informatique
Description: Vaxination Informatique submits its comments as part of the never ending UBB saga, this time, for the R&V of the 2010-255 decision initiated by Bell Canada on May 28th 2010.
Document: 1411436.pdf - 291KB

2010-06-28 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc.
Description: As stated in paragraph 33 of Telecom Order 99-592, the Canadian forbearance framework for Retail Internet Services is based on the principle that; a) as a result of the availability of underlying facilities at tariffed rates, b) below costs pricing are in the short run, not necessarily inconsistent with highly competitive markets, particularly if it is in response to competitive pressures and pricing initiatives by more established firms in the market.
Document: 1411425.doc - 30KB

2010-06-28 - Accelerated Connections Inc., EGATE Networks Inc. and TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: In accordance with the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, Accelerated Connections Inc. (“ACI”), EGATE Networks Inc. (“EGATE”) and TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) (collectively “TSPs”) are filing the attached Answer to the above-cited application of Bell Aliant, Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada.
Document: 1411377.zip - 83KB

2010-06-28 - Acanac Inc. and Managed Network Systems Inc.
Description: Acanac Inc. and Managed Network Systems Inc. (collectively, “Acanac and MNSi”) are in receipt of the above noted application dated 28 May 2010 (the “Application”) made on behalf of Bell Canada and Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (“Bell Aliant”) (collectively, the “Bell Companies”) to review and vary Telecom Decision CRTC 2010‐255, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada – Applications to introduce usage‐based billing and other changes to Gateway Access Services, dated 6 May 2010 (“Decision 2010‐255”).
Document: 1411365.pdf - 191KB

2010-06-28 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers
Description: This response by the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (“CAIP”) addresses a Review and Vary (“R&V”) application of Telecom Decision CRTC 2010‐255 (“Decision 2010‐255”) submitted by Bell Canada and Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (“Bell”) on May 28, 2010. Decision 2010‐255 was issued in response to tariff notices filed by Bell on March 13, 2009 proposing to introduce Usage Based Billing (”UBB”) for residential Gateway Access Service (GAS).
Document: 1411325.pdf - 153KB

2010-06-28 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: In accordance with the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure attached is the Answer of Distributel Communications Limited to the above-referenced Part VII Application filed by Bell Aliant and Bell Canada on 28 May 2010.
Document: 1411284.pdf - 56KB

2010-06-28 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) are in receipt of the above-noted review and vary application (the Application) dated May 28, 2010. This letter constitutes the Cable Carriers’ comments on the Application.
Document: 1411256.pdf - 138KB

2010-06-28 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter of 4 June 2010, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is filing the following comments on the application filed by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, Bell) requesting that the Commission review and vary Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-255, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada – Applications to introduce usage-based billing and other changes to Gateway Access Services, 6 May 2010 (the UBB Decision).
Document: 1411205.pdf - 72KB

2010-06-28 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of an application filed by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (together, “Bell”) requesting a review and variance of Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-255, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada – Applications to introduce usage-based billing and other changes to Gateway Access Services (“Decision 2010-255”).
Document: 1410876.pdf - 40KB

2010-06-28 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) files this Answer to an Application filed pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure (the “Rules”) by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (“Bell”).
Document: 1410856.pdf - 135KB

2010-06-25 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (Execulink) is in receipt of an Application by Bell Aliant and Bell Canada (collectively Bell) dated 28 May 2010 to Review and Vary Telecom Decision 2010-255 (Part VII), – Applications to introduce usage-based billing (UBB) and other changes to Gateway Access Services (GAS).
Document: 1410837.pdf - 47KB

2010-06-18 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter dated 11 June 2010, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are attaching their response to the Commission's interrogatory.
Document: 1409081.doc - 72KB

2010-06-11 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada - Re: Application to Review and Vary Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-255, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada, and Télébec, Limited Partnership – Applications to introduce usage-based billing and other changes to Gateway Access Services

2010-06-04 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada - Re: Bell Aliant, Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada – Application to review and vary Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-255

2010-06-01 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (Execulink) is in receipt of an application (the UBB R&V Application) filed on 28 May 2010 by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, Bell), requesting that the Commission review and vary the Commission’s determinations regarding Bell’s application to introduce usage based billing (UBB) and other changes to Bell’s wholesale Gateway Access Services (GAS), as set out in Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-255, 6 May 2010.
Document: 1400532.pdf - 24KB

2010-06-01 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is in receipt of an application (the UBB R&V Application) filed on 28 May 2010 by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, Bell), requesting that the Commission review and vary the Commission’s determinations regarding Bell’s application to introduce usage based billing (UBB) and other changes to Bell’s wholesale Gateway Access Services (GAS), as set out in Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-255.
Document: 1400508.pdf - 65KB

2010-05-28 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Please find attached an application is made on behalf of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) pursuant to section 62 of the Telecommunications Act (the Act) and Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure (the Rules).  In this application the Companies seek a review and variance of Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-255.  
Document: 1400406.zip - 81KB

Date modified:

2008-03-19