Search

Follow-up to Decision CRTC 2010-900: 8638-C12-201017137

Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers support structure service rates

References: 8661-E17-201113068

Interested Parties List = 15 December 2010
Comments = 3 March 2011
Reply Comments = 14 March 2011

2011-07-04 - Telelcom Decision CRTC 2011-406 Follow-up to Telecom Decision 2010-900 - Service pole rate and markup issues
File number: 8638-C12-201017137

2013-03-07 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Please find attached a copy of the following revised tariff page as a result of Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-406, July 4, 2011.
Document: 1872580.pdf - 37KB

2011-09-23 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: On 12 July 2011, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) issued revised tariff pages (1st Revised Page 311I and 2nd Revised Page 311K) for Supplementary Tariff Special Services and Facilities Tariff Item 9600 to reflect the approval of the service pole rate in Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-406 (Decision 2011-406). The existing tariff pages (Original Page 311I and 1st Revised Page 311K) were also provided.
Document: 1619277.zip - 43KB

2011-07-14 - Bell Canada
Description: ISSUED PAGES - Decision 2011-406 - NST
Document: 1591598.doc - 89KB

2011-07-14 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: Issued Pages as per Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-406.
Document: 1591580.doc - 81KB

2011-07-12 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In the attached, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is providing its revised tariff pages for Supplementary Tariff Special Services and Facilities Tariff Item 9600 to reflect the approval of the service pole rate in Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-406
Document: 1590866.zip - 67KB

2011-03-14 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 10 February 2011, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby providing its reply comments regarding the revision of service pole rates. Failure by MTS Allstream to address any argument or issue raised by any party should not be construed as agreement with or acceptance of such argument or issue where to do so would be contrary to MTS Allstream’s interests.
Document: 1531672.pdf - 85KB

2011-03-14 -
Description: Please find attached the Reply Comments of Bragg Communications Inc., the Canadian Cable Systems Alliance, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P. (collectively, the “Cable Carriers”) in the above-referenced proceeding.
Document: 1531663.zip - 354KB

2011-03-14 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) herewith files its Reply Comments in accordance with Decision 2010-900 and the modified procedure set out by Commission staff in the letter dated 10 February 2011 on “the Commission’s preliminary view that each ILEC’s revised service pole rate should be the same as the pole rate approved in this decision for that ILEC.”
Document: 1531651.pdf - 29KB

2011-03-14 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc.
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900 (“Decision 2010-900” or the “Decision”) and the Commission’s letter dated 10 January 2010, Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is hereby providing its reply comments with respect to the comments of other parties regarding the Commission’s preliminary view that each ILEC’s revised service pole rate should be the same as the pole rate approved in this decision for that ILEC.
Document: 1531594.pdf - 29KB

2011-03-14 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in a Commission staff letter dated 10 February 2011, the following constitutes the Reply Comments of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite.
document: 1531587.zip - 67KB

2011-03-03 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 67 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900 (“Decision 2010-900”) and the Commission’s letter dated 14 January 2010, Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. (“CNOC”) is hereby providing its comments with respect to the Commission’s preliminary view that each ILEC’s revised service pole rate should be the same as the pole rate approved in this decision for that ILEC.
Document: 1527247.pdf - 22KB

2011-03-03 -
Description: Please find attached the Comments of Bragg Communications Inc., the Canadian Cable Systems Alliance, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P. (collectively, the “Cable Carriers”) in the above-referenced proceeding.
Document: 1527241.zip - 351KB

2011-03-03 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) herewith files its Comments in accordance with Decision 2010-900 and the modified procedure set out by Commission staff in the letter dated 10 February 2011 on “the Commission’s preliminary view that each ILEC’s revised service pole rate should be the same as the pole rate approved in this decision for that ILEC.”1
Document: 1527093.pdf - 24KB

2011-03-03 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership's, Bell Canada's and Télébec, Société en commandite's (Télébec's) (the Companies')
Description: On 2 December 2010, the Commission issued Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900, Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers' support structure service rates (Decision 2010-900) in which it considered that two matters merit consideration in a follow-up proceeding (Follow-up to 2010-900).  One matter was whether ILEC support structure service rates should include an explicit mark-up of 15% on Phase II costs is whether the Commission's preliminary view that each ILEC's revised service pole rate should be the same as the pole rate approved in Decision 2010-900 is correct.  Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership's, Bell Canada's and Télébec, Société en commandite's (Télébec's) (collectively, the Companies') comments and reply comments with respect to the issue of an explicit mark-up were filed on 14 January 2011 and 24 January 2011 respectively.
Document: 1527065.zip - 751KB (revised)

2011-03-03 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900 Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers’ support structure service rates, 2 December 2010 (Decision 2010-900), the Commission requested parties to file written comments by 14 January 2011 – to consider the level at which revised service pole rates should be approved and the possible inclusion in support structure rates of an explicit mark-up on Phase II costs1.
Document: 1527051.pdf - 97KB

2011-02-10 - Commission Letter
Description:  Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Follow-up process established in Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers’ support structure service rates, Telecom Decision 2010-900

2011-02-10 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: On 2 December 2010, the Commission issued Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900, Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers' support structure service rates (Decision 2010-900) in which it considered that two matters merit consideration in a follow-up proceeding (Follow-up to Decision 2010-900).  The first matter is the inclusion in support structure rates of an explicit mark-up of 15% on Phase II costs. 
Document: 1507880.doc - 86KB

2011-01-24 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 14 January 2011, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby providing its reply comments regarding the possible inclusion of an explicit markup on Phase II costs for support structures. Failure by MTS Allstream to address any argument or issue raised by any party should not be construed as agreement with or acceptance of such argument or issue where to do so would be contrary to MTS Allstream’s interests.
Document: 1493023.pdf - 75KB

2011-01-24 - Bragg Communications Inc., Canadian Cable Systems Alliance, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Please find attached the Reply comments of Bragg Communications Inc., the Canadian Cable Systems Alliance, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw
Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the “Cable Carriers”) in the above-referenced proceeding.
Document: 1492969.zip - 359KB

2011-01-24 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 68 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900 and the Commission's letter dated 14 January 2011, Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. is hereby providing its reply comments to the submissions of other parties with respect to whether ILEC support structure service rates should include an explicit mark-up of 15 percent on Phase II costs.
Document: 1492957.pdf - 38KB

2011-01-24 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) herewith files its Reply Comments on “whether ILEC support structure service rates should include an explicit markup of 15 percent on Phase II costs” in accordance with Decision 2010-900 and the procedure set out in Commission's letter dated 14 January 2011.
Document: 1492830.pdf - 29KB

2011-01-24 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Telecom Decision CRTC 2010‑900, Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers' support structure service rates, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite are filing their reply comments with regard to the inclusion in support structure rates of an explicit mark-up on Phase II costs.
Document: 1492684.zip - 62KB

2011-01-14 - Commission Letter
Description:  Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Follow-up process established in Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers’ support structure service rates, Telecom Decision 2010-900

2011-01-14 - Bragg Communications Inc., Canadian Cable Systems Alliance, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Please find attached the Comments of Bragg Communications Inc., the Canadian Cable Systems Alliance, Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the “Cable Carriers”) in the above-referenced proceeding.
Document: 1488807.zip - 345KB

2011-01-14 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) herewith files its Comments in accordance with Decision 2010-900 and the Commission’s letter dated 14 January 2011. In this submission, TELUS is providing its Comments on the issue raised by the Commission in paragraph 67 of Decision 2010-900 on “whether ILEC support structure service rates should include an explicit markup of 15 percent on Phase II costs.”
Document: 1488520.pdf - 23KB

2011-01-14 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900, Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers’ support structure service rates, (Decision 2010-900), the Commission has requested the parties to file written comments by January 14th 2011 – to consider the level at which revised service pole rates should be approved and the possible inclusion in support structure rates of an explicit mark-up on Phase II costs.
Document: 1488024.pdf - 75KB

2011-01-14 - Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 67 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900 and the Commission's letter dated 24 January 2011, Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. is hereby providing its comments with respect to whether ILEC support structure service rates should include an explicit mark-up of 15 percent on Phase II costs.
Document: 1487986.pdf - 30KB

2011-01-14 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: On 2 December 2010, the Commission issued Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900, Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers' support structure service rates (Decision 2010-900) in which it considered that two matters merit consideration in a follow-up proceeding (Follow-up to 2010-900).
Document: 1487954.zip - 65KB

2011-01-12 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: On 2 December 2010, the Commission issued Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-900, Review of the large incumbent local exchange carriers' support structure service rates (Decision 2010-900) in which it considered that two matters merit consideration in a follow-up proceeding (Follow-up to Decision 2010-900). 
Document: 1486677.doc - 82KB

Date modified: