2005-03-31 - #: 8638-C12-200505349 - Follow-up to Decision 2005-20 - Pursuant to paragraph 202 - Service intervals for all CDN services and Type C loops offered by the ILEC

2007-09-07 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-81 The Commission approves new reduced service intervals for Competitor Digital Network services, where facilities are available, as proposed by MTS Allstream Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications, and TELUS Communications Company, and directs that the implementation date for these new reduced service intervals be within 60 days of the date of this Decision. Reference: 8638-C12-200505349.

2006-05-26 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-34 Follow‑up to Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors, Telecom Decision CRTC 2005‑20 – Service intervals for provisioning CDN services and Type C loops. Reference: 8638‑-C12-‑200505349.

2007-06-19 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  In paragraph 52(v) of Decision 2006-34, the Commission directed thata MTS ALlstream, SaskTel and TCC are to review, reduce, and refile, within one year of the date of this Decision, the service intervals for CDN services and Type C loops that they provide to their competitors to align more closely with the other ILECs.
Document: 776744.pdf - 64KB

2007-05-28 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description:  In Telecom Decision 2006-34 Follow-up to Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors, Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20 - Service intervals for provisioning CDN services and Type C loops, the Commission finalized the service intervals for Competitor Digital Network (CDN) services and Type C loops that competitors acquire from the incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs).
Document: 768542.doc - 53KB

2007-05-25 - MS Allstream Inc.
Description:  Pursuant to the procedure identified in paragraph 52 of Decision 2006-34, which required MTS Allstream to review, reduce and refile, within one year of the date of the Decision 2006-34, the service intervals for CDN services and Type C loops, MTS files the following intervals in days.
Document: 768463.pdf - 60KB

2007-05-25 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  As directed by the Commission in subparagraph 52 v) of Decision 2006-34, TELUS has reviewed its service intervals for all Competitor Digital Network (CDN) services and is hereby providing new improved service intervals in response to the Commission's directive to review, reduce and refile its standards within one year in order that they align more closely with the service intervals of other ILECs.
Document: 768456.pdf - 39KB

2005-10-19 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: As a result of a conversation with Commission staff this morning, Aliant has discovered that an interrogatory issued by the Commission on May 27, 2005
Document: 051019.zip - 128KB

2005-08-19 - MTS Allstream Inc
Description: In Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20, Finalization of quality of service rate plan for competitors, and Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-17, Retail quality of service rate adjustment plan and related issues the Commission put in place an exclusion
Document: 050819.doc - 128KB

2005-07-22 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors, Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20, the Commission determined that if an ILEC
Document: 050722.doc - 38KB

2005-06-10 - Bell Canada
Description: Pursuant to Commission staff's letter of 27 May 2005, Bell Canada hereby provides responses to interrogatories from the Commission.
Document: 050610_1.doc - 68KB

2005-06-10 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. Provideds the following response to the Commission staff's interrogatory of 27 May 2005
Document: 050610.zip - 51KB

2005-06-10 - Telus Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the Commission staff letter of 27 May 2005 referencing the above-captioned decision, attached are responses to the interrogatories
Document: 050610.zip - 21KB

2005-06-10 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: Pursuant to the letter received from the Commission dated 27 May 2005, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits its response to the interrogatory addressed to SaskTel.
Document: 050610.zip - 28KB

2005-05-27 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - MTS Allstream Inc., SaskTel, TELUS Communications, Aliant Telecom Inc. - Re: Follow-up to Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20 - Finalization of Quality of Service Rate Rebate Plan for Competitors - Interrogatories

2005-05-18 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's directive at paragraph 202 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20, Finalization of quality of services rate rebate plan for competitors, (Decision 2005-20) Aliant Telecom ("Aliant" or "the Company") hereby files its reply to comments filed with the Commission by MTS Allstream on 2005 05 10.
Document: 050518.pdf - 69KB

2005-05-16 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: In accordance with the proceeding established at paragraph 202 of Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors, Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel or the Company) files this Reply to Comments filed with the Commission submitted by MTS Allstream Inc. on 10 May 2005 and Bell Canada, as a competitive local exchange carrier (Bell CLEC), on 11 May 2005.
Document: 050516.doc - 66KB

2005-05-16 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS Communications Inc. (“TELUS”) is receipt of comments from Bell Canada as a Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (”Bell West”) and MTS Allstream Inc. (“MTS Allstream”) further to paragraph 202 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20, Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors in response and in response to TELUS’ filing of its fixed service intervals for all Competitor Digital Network (“CDN”) services and Type C loops.
Document: 050516.doc - 66KB

2005-05-16 - Bell Canada
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's directive at paragraph 202 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20, Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors, Bell Canada (or the Company) hereby files its reply comments to the 10 May 2005 comments of MTS Allstream Inc.
Document: 050516_2.doc - 66KB

2005-05-11 - Bell Canada
Description: In Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20, the Commission established 3 new quality of service indicators. These new indicators relate to the provision and repair of Type C loops and CDN services.
Document: 050511.doc - 67KB

2005-05-10 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is in receipt of comments from Aliant Telecom, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, société en commandite and TELUS Communications Inc. (TELUS) regarding these incumbent local exchange carriers’ (ILECs) proposed fixed service intervals for competitor digital network (CDN) services and Type C loops.
Document: 050510.doc - 88KB

2005-05-06 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20, Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors (Decision 2005-20), the Commission introduced two new competition-related quality of service (QoS) indicators to capture service intervals for the delivery of competitor digital network (CDN) services and Type C loops: Indicator 1.19 - Confirmed Due Dates Met and Indicator 1.19A - Late Completion.
Document: 050506_1.doc - 94KB

2005-05-03 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's directive at paragraph 202 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20, Finalization of quality of services rate rebate plan for competitors, (Decision 2005-20) Aliant Telecom (Aliant or the Company) hereby files its response regarding the proposed fixed service intervals for all CDN Services.
Document: 050503.doc - 50KB

2005-05-02 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20, Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors (Decision 2005-20), the Commission introduced two new competition-related quality of service (QoS) indicators to capture service intervals for the delivery of competitor digital network (CDN) services and Type C loops: Indicator 1.19 - Confirmed Due Dates Met and Indicator 1.19A - Late Completion.
Document: 050502.doc - 94KB

2005-05-02 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: In Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors, Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20 (Decision 2005-20), the Commission confirmed the competitor Quality of Service (“Q of S”) rate rebate plan, established 3 new Q of S competitor indicators , and initiated a process to establish service intervals for both Competitive Digital Network (“CDN” ) services and Type C loops.
Document: 050502.doc - 53KB

2005-05-02 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS Communications Inc. (“TELUS”) is receipt of Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20 issued 31 March 2005, entitled Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors
Document: 050502.doc - 72KB

2005-05-02 - Bell Canada
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's directive at paragraph 202 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20, Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors, Bell Canada hereby files its response regarding proposed fixed service intervals for all competitor digital network (CDN) services and Type C loops offered by Bell Canada.
Document: 050502_1.doc - 59KB

2005-05-02 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: Le 31 mars 2005, le Conseil de la radiodiffusion et des télécommunications canadiennes ("le Conseil") publiait la Décision de télécom CRTC 2005-20 ("Décision 2005-20") intitulée: FINALISATION DU PLAN DE RABAIS TARIFAIRE POUR LA QUALITÉ DU SERVICE FOURNI AUX CONCURRENTS
Document: 050502.doc - 59KB

Date Modified: 2007-09-07

Date modified:

2007-09-07