Follow-up to Decision CRTC 2003-48: 8638-C12-200309840

Incumbent local exchange carrier service intervals for various competitor services

2004-11-09 - Bell Canada
Description: Further to the process initiated by Decision 2003-48, Incumbent local exchange carrier service intervals for various competitor services and expanded upon in Public Notice 2003-9, Finalization of the Quality of Service rate adjustment plan for competitors, Commission staff, in a letter dated 21 July 2004, considered that "…it would be appropriate that Bell Canada and TCI negotiate [CSA-type agreements] with their CLEC customers."
Document: 041109.doc - 78KB

2004-10-22 - Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Description: In a letter dated 21 July 2004, Commission staff issued an opinion (the Staff Letter) that it would be appropriate that Bell Canada and TELUS (the ILECs) negotiate with their CLEC customers for service intervals associated with ILEC retail services that the CLEC purchase
Document: 041022.doc - 40KB

2004-09-15 - Bell Canada
Description: In Decision 2003-48, Incumbent local exchange carrier service intervals for various competitor services, the Commission established service intervals for certain competitor services which CLECs order from ILECs.
Document: 040915_1.doc - 80KB

2004-09-15 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS Communications Inc. is in receipt of a staff direction, dated 21 July 2004 with the above noted title, signed by the Acting Director General, Competition, Costing and Tariffs in the Telecommunications Sector.
Document: 040915.doc - 35KB

2004-07-21 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Parties - Subject: Follow-up to Decision 2003-48

2003-12-19 - Commission Letter
Files #: 8638-C12-200309840 - 8660-C12-200315095
Description: Letter addressed to Parties to Follow-Up to Decision 2003-48 and PN 2003-9 Interested Parties - Re: Follow-up to Telecom Decision 2003-48

2003-10-17 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedure established in the above-captioned decision and modified by the Commission’s letter of August 11, 2003, attached are TELUS’ Reply Comments made in relation to this matter.
Document: 031017.zip - 47KB

2003-10-17 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in paragraph 55 of Decision 2003-48, Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier Service Intervals for Various Competitor Services, as amended by the Commission's letter of 11 August 2003, Allstream provides the following reply comments.
Document: 031017_1.doc - 302KB

2003-10-17 - Microcell Solutions Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures established in Decision 2003-48, as amended by a Commission staff letter dated August 11, 2003, the following are Microcell’s reply comments on the issues raised in the follow-up proceeding to Decision 2003-48
Document: 031017.doc - 48KB

2003-10-17 - FCI Broadband
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Incumbent local exchange carrier service intervals for various competitor services, Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-48, 18 July 2003, as modified by the Commission’s letter, dated 11 August 2003, FCI Broadband hereby submits its reply comments.
Document: 031017.doc - 74KB

2003-10-17 - Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set forth by the Commission letter dated 11August 2003, Call-Net provides the following Reply Comments.
Document: 031017.doc - 45KB

2003-10-17 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 53 of Decision 2003-48, as amended by the Commission's letter dated 11 August 2003, Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the Companies) hereby file the attached Reply Comments.
Document: 031017_2.doc - 492KB

2003-09-17 - Microcell Solutions Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures established in Decision 2003-48, as amended by a Commission staff letter dated August 11, 2003, the following are Microcell’s comments on the issues raised in the follow-up proceeding to Decision 2003-48.
Document: 030917.doc - 57KB

2003-09-17 - FCI Broadband
Description: Pursuant to the procedure established by the Commission in the above-noted decision (Decision 03-48), FCI Broadband, a division of Futureway Communications Inc. (FCI Broadband) hereby files its comments on the issues raised by the Commission in paragraph 53
Document: 030917.doc - 67KB

2003-09-17 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedure established in the above-captioned decision and modified by the Commission’s letter of August 11, 2003, attached are TELUS’ Comments made in relation to this matter.
Document: 030917.zip - 43KB

2003-09-17 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in paragraph 54 of Decision 2003-48, as amended by Commission letter dated 11 August 2003, Allstream Corp. (Allstream) (formerly AT&T Canada) provides the following comments.
Document: 030917.doc - 303KB

2003-09-17 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to these procedures, Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus Canada”) submits the following comments.
Document: 030917.doc - 72KB

2003-09-17 - Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Description: In response to this invitation Call-Net Enterprises Inc. (Call-Net) is submitting its views herein
Document: 030917.doc - 49KB

2003-09-17 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc. and Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 53 of Decision 2003-48, as amended by the Commission's letter dated 11 August 2003, Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., and Saskatchewan Telecommunications (collectively, the Companies) hereby file the attached Comments.
Document: 030917.doc - 517KB

2003-08-11 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to TELUS Communications Inc. - Re: Follow-up to Incumbent local exchange carrier service intervals for various competitor services, Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-48.

2003-08-01 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: Aliant Telecom Inc., ("Aliant" or "the Company") is in receipt of a letter to the Commission from Telus Communications Inc. ("Telus") dated 2003 07 30 requesting an extension until 2003 09 17 for the submission of comments regarding the follow-up proceeding to Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-48
Document: 030801.doc - 43KB

2003-07-31 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: SaskTel is in receipt of a letter issued by TELUS Communications Inc. (TELUS), dated 30 July 2003, requesting that the Commission modify the dates for the follow-up proceeding as set out in paragraph 54 and 55 of Decision 2003-48
Document: 030731.doc - 52KB

2003-07-31 - Bell Canada
Description: The Company shares TELUS' concern regarding its own ability to meet the filing date specified by the Commission in paragraph 54 in view of the significant effort required to prepare its submission and the overlaps with numerous other proceedings. The filing date also conflicts with previously scheduled vacations for a number of the Company's employees who would be involved in the preparation of the Company's submission. The Company, therefore, fully supports TELUS' request.
Document: 030731_1.doc - 59KB

2003-07-30 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In paragraph 52 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-48, the Commission initiated a proceeding to examine the appropriateness of establishing service intervals and mean time to repair (MTTR) intervals for a number of services which the Commission identified, respectively, in two appendices to that Decision.
Document: 030730.doc - 40KB

Date modified:

2004-11-10