AT&T Canada Corp.: 8690-A4-01/01

Application seeking terms for access to Municipal Rights of Way with the Corporation of City of Toronto

2004-12-06 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-79 The Commission denies a request by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, the City of Edmonton and the City of Vancouver to intervene in two MTS Allstream Part VII applications filed against the City of Toronto and the City of Calgary. The Commission also denies a request by the City of Toronto and the City of Calgary to establish an alternative process, which would include an oral hearing, for making submissions with respect to the MTS Allstream applications. Reference: 8690-A4-01/01 and 8690-A4-04/02.

2003-12-04 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-82 The Commission considers that the provisions of the Telecommunications Act, including section 43, do not contemplate that the Commission could issue a broad direction requiring parties to bring all existing municipal access arrangements (MAAs) into conformity with a set of guidelines similar to those articulated in Decision CRTC 2001-23. The Commission is prepared to consider applications from Canadian carriers seeking to establish that municipal consent was not obtained on terms acceptable to the carrier with the onus on the Canadian carrier applying to the Commission to establish that the signed MAA does not represent proof that the Canadian carrier has obtained, on terms acceptable to it, the consent of the municipality to construct a transmission line. Reference: 8690-C12-03/01, 8690-A4-01/01 and 8690-A4-04/02.

2001-08-31 - Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2001-99 - Terms and conditions of existing agreements for access to municipal property. Reference: 8690-A4-01/01 - 8690-C12-03/01.

For reference only: 8690-C12-03/01 - 8690-A4-04/02

2005-03-15 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to City of Toronto and MTS Allstream Inc. - Re: Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-79 - Application to vary the terms and conditions of existing municipal agreements with the City of Toronto

2005-02-28 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (together with its predecessor corporations, hereinafter referred to as MTS Allstream) has received the City of Toronto's (Toronto) letter of 23 February 2005 in response to MTS Allstream's reply of 14 February 2005 (the Reply).
Document: 050228.doc - 469KB

2005-02-23 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto (“Toronto”) has now received and had an opportunity to review the Reply dated February 14, 2005 (the “Reply”) of MTS Allstream Inc. (“Allstream”) to the City of Toronto’s Answer filed February 4, 2005.
Document: 050223.zip - 312KB

2005-02-14 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. hereby submits its Reply comments to the City of Toronto pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-79, Process for MTS Allstream's applications to vary the terms and conditions of existing municipal agreements with the cities of Toronto and Calgary, 6 December 2004.
Document: 050214.zip - 2246KB

2005-02-04 - City of Toronto
Description: Answer of the City of Toronto to the comments of MTS Allstream Inc. pursuant to telecom decision CRTC 2004-79 (to vary the terms of existing agreements)
Document: 050204.zip - 2361KB

2005-01-27 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to City of Toronto - Re: Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-79 - Request for disclosure - MTS Allstream comments of 5 January 2005

2005-01-25 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto (“Toronto”) is in receipt of the written comments (dated 5 January, 2005) submitted by MTS Allstream Inc. (“Allstream”) pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-79
Document: 050125.doc - 60KB

2005-01-05 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 36 of the above-noted decision MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream, together with its predecessor corporations, are hereinafter referred to as MTS Allstream) submits the following comments regarding how Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-82, Terms and conditions of existing agreements for access to municipal rights-of-way , 4 December 2003, should be applied in the context of MTS Allstream's dispute with the City of Toronto.
Document: 050105.zip- 3488KB

2004-11-29 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: We are writing concerning the status of this Part VII application, filed by AT&T Canada Corp. (now MTS Allstream Inc.) on 28 May 2001.
Document: 041129.pdf - 107KB

2004-06-14 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto (Toronto) is in receipt of the written comments (dated May 26, 2004) submitted by Allstream and Telus (the Carriers) in response to the Commission’s direction of April 26, 2004, and submits the following reply comments
Document: 040614.doc - 78KB

2004-06-14 - City of Calgary
Description: The City of Calgary (Calgary) has reviewed the comments of Allstream Corp (Allstream) and TELUS Corporation (TELUS) both dated 2004 May 26, as well as those of the Regional Municipality of Halifax (Halifax) of the same date
Document: 040614.doc - 39KB

2004-05-26 - Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM)
Description: These comments are made in response to the Commission's invitation dated 26 April 2004 in respect of certain requests made by Toronto, Calgary, FCM el al.
Document: 040526.wpd - 56KB

2004-05-26 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Allstream hereby responds to the Commission's April 26, 2004 request for comments on the procedure proposed by the City of Toronto in its letter of April 20, 2004 as well as the comments by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the cities of Edmonton and Vancouver (FCM et al) submitted April 20, 2004 and the City of Calgary submitted on April 21, 2004
Document: 040526.doc - 268KB

2004-05-26 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: Further to the letter of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (the Commission) dated 26 April 2004, parties were invited to comment on the requests made by Toronto, FCM et. al. and Calgary that...
Document: 040526.doc - 53KB

2004-04-26 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Interested Parties to PN 2001-99 - Re: Request for procedure direction - Comments on proposed procedure for consideration of Allstream Part VII applications under Terms and conditions of existing agreements for access to municipal rights-of-way, Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-82, 4 December 2003

2004-04-21 - City of Calgary
Description: The City of Calgary is aware of correspondence dated 2004 March 11 from Allstream Corp. to the Interested Parties indicating that Allstream proposes to file the submissions contemplated by Decision 2003-82 by 2004 April 12
Document: 040421.doc - 28KB

2004-04-20 - Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), City of Edmonton and City of Vancouver
Description: This submission is being filed on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), City of Edmonton (Edmonton), and City of Vancouver (Vancouver) (collectively the Municipal Interveners).
Document: 040420.doc - 67KB

2004-04-20 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto is in receipt of correspondence (March 11, 2004) from Allstream Corp. wherein Allstream proposed to file the submissions contemplated by Decision 2003-82 within 30 days of the date of that letter, i.e., by 12 April 2004
Document: 040420.doc - 60KB

2004-03-12 - Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipalities et al
Description: This submission is being filed on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipalities, City of Edmonton, City of Calgary, City of Toronto and City of Vancouver (the Municipal Parties).
Document: 040312.doc - 62KB

2004-01-08 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to City of Toronto - Re: Follow-up to Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-82 - Further to the City of Toronto's letter of 5 January 2004

2004-01-05 - City of Toronto
Description: Further to my letter of December 30, 2003, please be advised that I have now determined that a copy of Allstream's December 17, 2003 request was e-mailed to my office on that date
Document: 040105.doc - 51KB

2003-12-30 - City of Toronto
Description: I am in receipt of your letter of December 30, 2003. The City of Toronto objects to the issuance of an ex parte decision by the Commission in these circumstances and asks that the Commission consider the following...
Document: 031230.zip - 114KB

2003-12-30 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Allstream Inc. - Re: Terms and conditions of existing agreements for access to municipal rights of way - Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-82 - 4 December 2003

2001-07-25 - AT&T Canada Corp.
Description: This letter is filed on behalf of AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company and AT&T Canada Corp. (collectively, AT&T Canada). AT&T Canada is in receipt of a letter dated 11 July 2001 (the Letter) filed with the Commission by the City of Toronto (the City).
Document:
010725.doc - 42KB

2001-07-23 - City of Toronto
Description: I am writing to advise the Commission of the release on July 18, 2001 of the reasons (July 13, 2001) of the Federal Court of Appeal in the appeal of CRTC Telecom Decision No. 99-13. The unreported text of the decision is enclosed with this letter in soft copy.
Document:
010723. doc - 46KB

2001-07-20 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto (the "City") has now, pursuant to the Commission's letter of July 10, 2001, received comments from AT&T Canada ("AT&T"), Vidéotron Télécom ltée ("VTL") and Bell Canada ("Bell") respecting the issue of whether unsolicited comments previously received from non-parties to this proceeding should become part of the record of this proceeding.
Document:
010720.doc - 58KB

2001-07-18 - Bell Canada
Description: Bell Canada (the Company) is in receipt of a letter from the Commission, dated and received 10 July 2001, in which the Commission has issued directives on procedure regarding the above referenced Part VII application (the AT&T Application) from AT&T Canada Corp. (AT&T).
Document:
010718.doc - 42KB

2001-07-18 - AT&T Canada Corp.
Description: These comments are filed on behalf of AT&T Canada Corp. and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company (collectively, AT&T Canada) pursuant to the direction set out by the Commission in its letter dated 10 July 2001.
Document:
010718.doc - 38KB

2001-07-18 - Vidéotron Télécom ltée
Description: Vidéotron Télécom Ltée ("VTL") is in receipt of the Commission's letter, dated July 10, 2001, in which AT&T Canada, Canadian Cable Television Association ("CCTA"), Telus Corporation ("Telus"), Bell Canada ("Bell"), GroupTelecom ("GT") and VTL are invited to file comments with the Commission, copying the City of Toronto, as to whether the correspondence filed with the Commission by these parties in the above matter should form part of the record of this proceeding.
Document:
010718.doc - 39KB

2001-07-11 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto has now received and had an opportunity to review the Reply dated July 9, 2001 (the "Reply") of AT&T Canada ("AT&T") to the City of Toronto's Answer (filed June 28, 2001). Unfortunately, a review of the Reply shows that AT&T has chosen to introduce a number of new issues and evidence before the Commission which either should not be considered or should have properly been contained in its initial Application.
Document:
010711.doc - 53KB

2001-07-10 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: AT&T V. City of Toronto: Part VII Application

2001-07-10 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto has received the Commission's letter (dated July 10, 2001) providing some procedural direction with respect to the unsolicited comments received by CCTA, Telus, Bell Canada, Group Telecom and Vidéotron.
Document:
010710_1.doc - 43KB

2001-07-10 - City of Toronto
Description: Answer of the City of Toronto to the Application of At&T Canada for Access to Municipal Rights of Way Within the Corporation of the City of Toronto.
Document:
010710.doc - 194KB

2001-07-09 - AT&T Canada Corp.
Description: Pursuant to section 61 of Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, AT&T Canada Corp. on behalf of itself and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company (AT&T Canada) hereby files the attached reply to the City of Toronto's response to the above-noted application.
Document:
010709.doc - 66KB

2001-06-29 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto has now received letters from Telus Communications Inc., GT Group Telecom Services Corp. and Bell Canada providing comments on the Part VII Application by AT&T.
Document:
010629.doc - 45KB

2001-06-29 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto has now received a further letter from Vidéotron Télécom ltée which is virtually identical in content to those submitted by the parties mentioned in my earlier letter today. It would appear that a mailing campaign is now underway. For the reasons as set in my earlier letter, the City again objects to any consideration by the Commission of these unsolicited comments from parties who have no involvement in the private contractual dispute before the Commission.
Document:
010629_1.doc - 42KB

2001-06-29 - Vidéotron Télécom Ltée
Description: On May 28, 2001, AT&T Canada filed a Part VII application by which it is seeking a Commission order setting out terms and conditions under which the City of Toronto would provide access to public highways and municipal property located on the territory of the City of Toronto for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and operating a fibre optic telecommunications network.
Document:
010629.doc - 34KB

2001-06-28 - Bell Canada
Description: Bell Canada is in receipt of an application submitted by AT&T Canada Corp. (AT&T) dated 28 May 2001 seeking a Commission order which would substitute terms and conditions in the current access agreement between AT&T and the City of Toronto with terms and conditions that are consistent with those set out in Decision 2001-23 - Ledcor/Vancouver - Construction, operation and maintenance of transmission lines in Vancouver.
Document:
010628_1.doc - 55KB

2001-06-28 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS recommends that the Commission resolve the dispute between AT&T and the City in line with the principles established in Decision 2001-23.
Document:
010628.doc - 47KB

2001-06-28 - GT Group Telecom Services Corp.
Decription: GT Group Telecom Services Corp. (Group Telecom) is in receipt of an application dated 28 May, 2001, by AT&T Canada Corp. on behalf of itself and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company (AT&T Canada) filed pursuant to subsections 32(d) and (e) and 43(4) of the Telecommunications Act.
Document:
010628.doc - 52KB

2001-06-27 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: The CCTA supports the application by AT&T Canada. In CCTA's submission, the principles, terms and conditions for access to municipal rights of way established in Decision 2001-23 are important to furthering the Commission's objective of fostering a competitive telecommunications market.
Document:
010627.doc - 84KB

2001-05-28 - AT&T Canada Corp.
Description: Pursuant to Part VII of the Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, AT&T Canada Corp. on behalf of itself and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company ("AT&T Canada") hereby files the attached Part VII Application. AT&T Canada is seeking a Commission order which substitutes those terms and conditions contained in the Licence of the Use of City Rights of Way Agreement ("the Licence Agreement") between AT&T Canada and the Corporation of the City of Toronto ("the City") which are incompatible with the terms approved in Decision CRTC 2001-23.
Document:
010528.zip - 37KB

Date modified:

2005-03-21