2008-11-06 - #: 8638-C12-200817471 - Suivi de la décision 2008-105 - Régime de qualité du service de détail dans les marchés ne faisant pas l'objet d'une abstention de la réglementation

Déposer en utilisant les services en ligne

2009-08-06 - Ordonnance de télécom CRTC 2009-475 Demande d'adjudication de frais concernant la participation du Centre pour la défense de l’intérêt public (le PIAC) à l'instance de suivi de la décision de télécom 2008-105  
Numéro de dossier : 8638-C12-200817471 et 4754-348

2009-05-25 - Politique réglementaire de télécom CRTC 2009-304 Suivi de la décision de télécom 2008-105 – Régime de qualité du service de détail dans les marchés ne faisant pas l'objet d'une abstention de la réglementation qui s'appliquent aux ESLT comptant plus de 25 000 SAR
Numéro de dossier : 8638-C12-200817471

2009-03-05 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company is in receipt of an application for costs from PIAC dated February 23, 2009 in relation to its participation, on behalf of the Consumer Groups, in the follow-up process initiated by Decision 2008-105.
Document: 1037345.pdf - 21KO

2009-03-04 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies) are in receipt of a claim for costs from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumer Groups in the above-noted proceeding, dated 23 February 2009.  Although SaskTel and Télébec participated separately in the proceeding, they join with the other Companies in this costs reply.
Document: 1036450.doc - 94KO

2009-02-23 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: This is an application for costs and taxation thereof, made on behalf of the Consumer Groups in respect of their participation in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1047094.doc - 9414KO

2009-01-23 – MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: These are the reply comments of MTS Allstream Inc. in response to the follow-up proceeding established in Telecom Decision CRTC 2008-105, Retail quality of service regime in non-forborne markets, 6 November 2008 to develop an updated quality of service reporting/monitoring framework in non-forborne areas for incumbent local exchange carriers with 25,000 Network Access Services
Document: 1012742.pdf - 84KO

2009-01-23 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: We have attached the Reply Comments filed on behalf of the Consumer Groups re: Follow up to Telecom Decision 2008-105
Document: 1012991.pdf - 214KB

2009-01-23 – TELUS Communications Company
Description: Pursuant to the Commission’s procedure as set out in paragraph 35 of Decision 2008-105, TELUS Communications Company hereby files its Reply comments.
Document: 1012756.pdf - 37KO 

2009-01-23 – Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 35 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2008-105, Retail quality of service regime in non-forborne markets (Decision 2008-105), the following provides the reply comments of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, Société en commandite (Télébec) (collectively, the Companies) on this matter.
Document: 1012760.doc - 130KO 

2009-01-23 – Northwestel Inc.
Description: Reply Comments to Follow-up Proceeding to Telecom Decision CRTC 2008-105
Document: 1012765.pdf - 78KO

2009-01-16– Northwestel Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paraph 35 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2008-105 the Government of the Northwest Territories hereby submits its reply comments in the subject proceeding.
Document: 1013139.pdf - 121KO

2009-01-12 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description:  Please find enclosed the Comments filed on behalf of the Consumer Association of Canada (CAC) and the National Anti-Poverty Organization (NAPO), (the Consumer Groups), in respect of the above-mentioned proceeding.
Document: 1010786.zip - 343KO

2009-01-12 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: These are the comments of MTS Allstream Inc. in response to the follow-up proceeding established in Telecom Decision CRTC 2008-105, Retail quality of service regime in non-forborne markets, 6 November 2008.
Document: 1005398.pdf - 72KO

2009-01-12 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is providing the following comments in response to the Commission's follow-up process established in Decision 2008-105.
Document: 1005371.pdf - 25 KO

2009-01-12 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) et Télébec, Société en commandite (Télébec) (the Companies)
Description: On 17 April 2008, the Commission issued Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-4, Notice of consultation – Review of the regulatory requirements associated with the retail quality of service regime in non-forborne markets, for the purpose of reviewing the regulatory requirements associated with the retail quality of service (Q of S) regime.
Document: 1005318.doc - 127KO

2009-01-09 - Government of the Northwest Territories
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 35 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2008-105 the Government of the Northwest Territories hereby submits its comments concerning "the appropriateness of new or existing performance indicators, and whether the new regime should be complaint-based or based on indicators and performance standards."
Document: 1006024.doc - 363KO

Mise à jour : 2009-08-06

Date de modification :

2008-10-09