2003/07/24 - #: 8690-A74-200309593 - Allstream Corp. contre City of Edmonton - Consentement de servitudes municipal et entente d'accès2003/07/24 - #: 8622-A74-200309593 - Allstream Corp. contre City of Edmonton - Consentement de servitudes municipal
Liste des Parties Intéressées
Décision de télécom CRTC 2005-36 Le Conseil établit que les terrains servant au train léger sur rail (TLR) dans la ville d'Edmonton (Edmonton ou la Ville) constituent un « autre lieu public » au sens de l'article 43 de la Loi sur les télécommunications. Par conséquent, le Conseil a ordonné à MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) et à Edmonton de négocier, à partir des coûts causals, une structure de frais selon laquelle MTS Allstream pourrait, pour la construction, l'entretien et l'exploitation de ses lignes de transmission, avoir accès en permanence aux terrains servant au TLR.
Référence : 8690-A74-200309593.
2004/02/09 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Pursuant to the letter of Paul Godin, Director, Competition Implementation & Technology, Telecommunications - CRTC (the Commission's Process Letter), these are the final reply comments of Allstream in response to other parties' submissions regarding the interpretation of the term "highway or other public place" in section 43 of the Telecommunications Act (the Act).
Document: 040209.doc - 280KO
2004/01/23 - City of Edmonton
Description: Reply of the Respondent, The City of Edmonton, to the Comments of FCI Broadband and the Canadian Cable Television Association et al.
Document: 040123.pdf - 69KO
2004/01/19 - Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM)
Description: This submission is made on behalf of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), City of Ottawa, City of Toronto and City of Vancouver (collectively, the Municipal Interveners) in accordance with the Commission's letter dated December 2, 2003 in the above-cited proceeding.
Document: 040119.pdf - 2561KO
2004/01/19 - McCarthy Tétrault on behalf of the Telecom Internevers
Description: The interveners, Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA), TELUS Communications Inc. (TELUS), Bell Canada, Call-Net Enterprises Inc., Aliant Telecom Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunictions (SaskTel) and 360networks Canada Ltd./LondonConnect Inc. (Telecom Interveners), have received the comments filed on January 9, 2004
Document: 040119.pdf - 261KO
2004/01/09 - City of Ottawa
Description: These comments are made by the City of Ottawa in the matter of the application made by Allstream Corp. dated 9 July 2003, which requests from the CRTC an order granting Allstream access to the City of Edmonton's Light Trail Transit system
Document: 040109.pdf - 317KO
2004/01/09 - City of Vancouver
Description: Submission of the City of Vancouver to Part VII Application - Acces to the City of Edmonton Light Rail Transit
Document: 040109.wpd - 81KO
2004/01/09 - FCI Broadband
Description: FCI Broadband is in receipt of the Commission's letter, dated 2 December 2003, inviting parties to submit comments on the proper interpretation of the term "highway or other public place" under s. 43(2) and 43(4) of the Telecommunications Act (the Act)
Document: 040109.doc - 74KO
2004/01/09 - McCarthy Tétrault on behalf of the Telecom Interveners
Description: The joint submission is made on behalf of Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA), TELUS Communications Inc. (TELUS), Bell Canada, Call-Net Enterprises Inc., Aliant Telecom Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunictions (SaskTel) and 360networks Canada Ltd./LondonConnect Inc. (Telecom Interveners). Each of these parties relies on access to public property for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and operating their transmission lines and, accordingly, as a direct interest in the issues raised in this proceeding.
Document: 040109.pdf - 728KO
2004/01/09 - City of Toronto
Description: By letter (dated December 2, 2003), the Commission has granted the request of the City of Toronto (Toronto) to provide submissions in respect of the meaning of the term "highway or other public place" as that term is used in section 43 of the Telecommunications Act (the Act).
Document: 040109.doc - 62KO
2004/01/09 - Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM)
Description: The term "highway" is well understood to mean a public road, i.e., a road that is dedicated for the purpose of allowing members of the public to travel either as pedestrians or by independently operated vehicles
Document: 040109.pdf - 1456KO
2003/12/02 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Description: Lettre adressée à Allstream Corp & Ville d'Edmonton - Objet Demande en vertue de la Partie VII - Accès au train léger sur rails de la Ville d'Edmonton - Procédure
2003/11/04 - Christian Tacit on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM)
Description: This submission is being made on behalf of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), the City of Calgary, the City of Ottawa, the City of Vancouver and the City of Winnipeg, hereinafter collectively called the Municipal Interveners
Document: 031104.doc - 40KO
2003/11/04 - Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA)
Description: The CCTA is in receipt of a letter from Allstream, dated 30 October 2003, urging the Commission to reject comments from the City of Calgary, City of Ottawa, City of Toronto, City of Vancouver, City of Winnipeg and Federation of Canadian Municipalities.
Document: 031104.pdf - 58KO
2003/11/03 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto (Toronto) has received and reviewed the submission (dated October 30, 2003) opposing the granting of intervenor status to Toronto and others in respect of the Application filed by Allstream Corp
Document: 031103.doc - 58KO
2003/11/03 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS has received and reviewed a letter from Allstream dated October 30, 2003 requesting the Commission to reject the requests of the City of Ottawa, City of Toronto, City of Vancouver, City of Winnipeg and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (collectively, the Municipalities) to intervene in the above Part VII Application
Document: 031103.doc - 36KO
2003/10/30 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Allstream is in receipt of comments from the City of Calgary dated 24 October 2003, the City of Ottawa, the City of Toronto, the City of Vancouver, the City of Winnipeg and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) dated 27 October 2003 (collectively, the Municipalities) seeking permission to intervene in the process initiated by the above-referenced Part VII application.
Document: 031030.doc - 252KO
2003/10/27 - City of Ottawa
Description: This submission is made by the City of Ottawa as an intervention in the matter of the Application made by Allstream Corp. dated 9 July 2003, which requests from the Commission an order granting Allstream access to the City of Edmonton's Light Rail Transit (LRT) system
Document: 031027.doc - 50KO
2003/10/27 - City of Vancouver
Description: The City of Vancouver has reviewed the Application submitted on July 24, 2003 by Allstream Corp. pursuant to sections 42 and 43 of the Telecommunications Act and Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure.
Document: 031027.wpd - 92KO
2003/10/27 - City of Winnipeg
Description: The City of Winnipeg has reviewed a Part VII application filed by Allstream Corp. (Allstream) against the City of Edmonton (Edmonton) on 2003 July 24.
Document: 031027.doc - 46KO
2003/10/27 - Christian Tacit on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipality (FCM)
Description: This submission is being made on behalf of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), the national voice of municipal governments.
Document: 031027.doc - 62KO
2003/10/27 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto has received and reviewed an Application (dated July 24, 2003) filed by Allstream Corp. pursuant to subsection 43(4) and section 42 of the Telecommunications Act and Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure.
Document: 031027.doc - 86KO
2003/10/24 - City of Calgary
Description: The City of Calgary believes that Allstream's application raises issues of national importance that could adversely impact all municipalities in Canada if the Commission grants the order Allstream is seeking. Accordingly, Calgary seeks permission to file this intervention.
Document: 031024.doc - 21KO
2003/10/23 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Allstream is in receipt of comments filed by the City of Edmonton (Edmonton or the Respondent) on 29 September 2003 regarding an application filed by Allstream on 24 July 2003 pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunication Rules of Procedure and sections 42 and 43 of the Telecommunications Act.
Document: 031023.zip - 69KO
2003/10/08 - Miller Thomson on behalf of the City of Edmonton
Description: Further to your letter of October 7, 2003, please be advised that we consent to the extension of time requested in your letter.
Document: 031008.pdf - 75KO
2003/10/07 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Due to workload constraints, Allstream Corp. (Allstream) is unable to file reply comments on the above‑referenced application within the timeframes provided for in a Part VII process.
Document: 031007.doc - 244KO
2003/10/07 - Miller Thomson on behalf of the City of Edmonton
Description: Please find attached the electronic version of the City of Edmonton's Response to the Application made by Allstream Corp. pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure.
Document: 031007.zip - 493KO
2003/09/30 - Miller Thomson on behalf of the City of Edmonton
Description: Further to our filing of the answer of the Application, City of Edmonton, on September 29, 2003, we have been advised by our client, the City of Edmonton, athat there is a small inaccuracy in paragraph 28
Description: 030930.pdf - 39KO
2003/09/29 - Miller Thomson on behalf of the City of Edmonton
Description: In response to Allstream Corp.'s application pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, the City of Edmonton hereby files its answer to Allstream's application.
Document: 030929.pdf - 3231KO
2003/08/14 - Letter du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Description: Lettre adressée à The City of Edmonton - Object: Demande de la Partie VII d'Allstream - La ville d'Edmonton demande une prorogation du délai pour soumettre une réponse.
2003/08/11 - City of Edmonton
Description: Allstream Part VII Application Re: The City of Edmonton request for extension of time for filing a response
Document: 030811.pdf - 98KO
2003/07/30 - City of Edmonton
Description: Your letter of June 24, 2003 arrived by courrier at our office on the afternoon of July 29. The letter suggests that it was also faxed and sent by email.
Document: 030730.pdf - 47KO
2003/07/24 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, Allstream Corp. (Allstream) (formerly AT&T Canada Corp.) submits the attached application
Document: 030724.doc - 285KO
- Date de modification :