AT&T Canada: 8690-A4-04/02
Seeking a Commission order setting out the terms and conditions under which the City of Calgary may grant continuing access to public highways and municipal property within the City's jurisdiction
2004-12-06 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-79 The Commission denies a request by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, the City of Edmonton and the City of Vancouver to intervene in two MTS Allstream Part VII applications filed against the City of Toronto and the City of Calgary. The Commission also denies a request by the City of Toronto and the City of Calgary to establish an alternative process, which would include an oral hearing, for making submissions with respect to the MTS Allstream applications. Reference: 8690-A4-01/01 and 8690-A4-04/02.
2003-12-04 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-82 The Commission considers that the provisions of the Telecommunications Act, including section 43, do not contemplate that the Commission could issue a broad direction requiring parties to bring all existing municipal access arrangements (MAAs) into conformity with a set of guidelines similar to those articulated in Decision CRTC 2001-23. The Commission is prepared to consider applications from Canadian carriers seeking to establish that municipal consent was not obtained on terms acceptable to the carrier with the onus on the Canadian carrier applying to the Commission to establish that the signed MAA does not represent proof that the Canadian carrier has obtained, on terms acceptable to it, the consent of the municipality to construct a transmission line. Reference: 8690-C12-03/01, 8690-A4-01/01 and 8690-A4-04/02.
2002-08-09 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2002-46 In this decision, the Commission suspends the proceeding initiated by AT&T Canada Corp.'s application of 24 June 2002, filed pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, naming the City of Calgary as respondent. The Commission suspends the proceeding until such time as it has reached a decision in the proceeding initiated by Terms and conditions of existing agreements for access to municipal property, Public Notice CRTC 2001-99, 13 August 2001. Reference: 8690-A4-04/02.
For reference only: 8690-C12-03/01 - 8690-A4-01/01
2005-02-14 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. hereby submits its Reply comments to the City of Calgary pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-79, Process for MTS Allstream's applications to vary the terms and conditions of existing municipal agreements with the cities of Toronto and Calgary, 6 December 2004.
Document: 050214.doc - 512KB
2005-02-04 - City of Calgary
Description: The City of Calgary pursuant to the above-noted decision submits its answer to the Comments of MTS Allstream Inc. regarding the application of Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-82, Terms and conditions of existing agreement for access to municipal rights-of-way, to MTS Allstream's Part VII application regarding The City of Calgary.
Document: 050204.zip - 2873KB
2005-01-25 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto (“Toronto”) is in receipt of the written comments (dated 5 January, 2005) submitted by MTS Allstream Inc. (“Allstream”) pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-79
Document: 050125.doc - 60KB
2005-01-05 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 36 of the above-noted decision MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream, together with its predecessor corporations, are hereinafter referred to as MTS Allstream) submits the following comments regarding how Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-82, Terms and conditions of existing agreements for access to municipal rights-of- way, 4 December 2003, should be applied in the context of MTS Allstream's dispute with the City of Calgary.
Document: 050105.zip - 1231KB
2004-06-14 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto (Toronto) is in receipt of the written comments (dated May 26, 2004) submitted by Allstream and Telus (the Carriers) in response to the Commission’s direction of April 26, 2004, and submits the following reply comments
Document: 040614.doc - 78KB
2004-06-14 - City of Calgary
Description: The City of Calgary (Calgary) has reviewed the comments of Allstream Corp (Allstream) and TELUS Corporation (TELUS) both dated 2004 May 26, as well as those of the Regional Municipality of Halifax (Halifax) of the same date
Document: 040614.doc - 39KB
2004-05-26 - Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM)
Description: These comments are made in response to the Commission's invitation dated 26 April 2004 in respect of certain requests made by Toronto, Calgary, FCM el al.
Document: 040526.wpd - 56KB
2004-05-26 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Allstream hereby responds to the Commission's April 26, 2004 request for comments on the procedure proposed by the City of Toronto in its letter of April 20, 2004 as well as the comments by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the cities of Edmonton and Vancouver (FCM et al) submitted April 20, 2004 and the City of Calgary submitted on April 21, 2004
Document: 040526.doc - 268KB
2004-05-26 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: Further to the letter of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (the Commission) dated 26 April 2004, parties were invited to comment on the requests made by Toronto, FCM et. al. and Calgary that...
Document: 040526.doc - 53KB
2004-05-03 - Town of Fort Erie
Description: Receipt is acknowledged of your letter dated April 26, 2004 regarding the above-referenced matter.
Document: 040503.doc - 22KB
2004-04-26 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Interested Parties to PN 2001-99 - Re: Request for procedure direction - Comments on proposed procedure for consideration of Allstream Part VII applications under Terms and conditions of existing agreements for access to municipal rights-of-way, Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-82, 4 December 2003
2004-04-21 - City of Calgary
Description: The City of Calgary is aware of correspondence dated 2004 March 11 from Allstream Corp. to the Interested Parties indicating that Allstream proposes to file the submissions contemplated by Decision 2003-82 by 2004 April 12
Document: 040421.doc - 28KB
2004-04-20 - Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), City of Edmonton and City of Vancouver
Description: This submission is being filed on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), City of Edmonton (Edmonton), and City of Vancouver (Vancouver) (collectively the Municipal Interveners).
Document: 040420.doc - 67KB
2004-04-20 - City of Toronto
Description: The City of Toronto is in receipt of correspondence (March 11, 2004) from Allstream Corp. wherein Allstream proposed to file the submissions contemplated by Decision 2003-82 within 30 days of the date of that letter, i.e., by 12 April 2004
Document: 040420.doc - 60KB
2004-03-12 - Nelligan O'Brien Payne on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipalities et al
Description: This submission is being filed on behalf of Federation of Canadian Municipalities, City of Edmonton, City of Calgary, City of Toronto and City of Vancouver (the Municipal Parties).
Document: 040312.doc - 62KB
2004-03-11 - Allstream Corp.
Description: This refers to your letter dated 30 December 2003 with respect to this matter.
Document: 040311.doc - 244KB
2003-12-30 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Allstream Inc. - Re: Terms and conditions of existing agreements for access to municipal rights of way - Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-82 - 4 December 2003
2002-07-17 - AT&T Canada Corp.
Description: This constitutes the reply of AT&T Canada Corp. on behalf of itself and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company (collectively, AT&T Canada) to the 8 July 2002 submission of the City of Calgary ("Calgary") and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities ("FCM"), requesting the Commission to either reject the within application as being premature, or suspend the Part VII process pending a determination in the Public Notice 2001-99 proceeding.
Document: 020717.doc - 38KB
2002-07-08 - City of Calgary / Federation of Canadian Municipalities
Description: This submission is made on behalf of the City of Calgary ("Calgary") and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities ("FCM"). Calgary and FCM are in receipt of an Application filed by AT&T Canada Corp. and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company (collectively "AT&T Canada") naming Calgary as respondent pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure.
Document: 020708.doc - 28KB
2002-06-24 - AT&T Canada Corp.
Description: Pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, AT&T Canada Corp. on behalf of itself and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company (collectively, AT&T Canada) submits the attached application.
Document: 020624.doc - 175KB
- Date modified: