Search

Suite Systems Inc.: 8690-S50-01/01

Application for Access to Support Structure Utility Poles in the City of Calgary in respect of which Telus Communications Inc. Exercises Access Rights

File Closed - Commission Letter - 2004/07/29


2004-07-29 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Stikeman Elliott - Re: Part VII application for access to the support structure utility poles in the City of Calgary in respect of which TELUS Communications Inc. exercises access rights

2002/08/30 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedure set out in the Commission letter of August 15, 2002 TELUS Communications Inc. (“TELUS”) files herewith its responses to the CRTC interrogatories.
Document: 020830.zip - 855KB

2002/08/21 - Goodmans for ENMAX Corporation
Description: We are writing to update you concerning a recent development in this matters.
Document: 020821.zip - 64KB

2002/08/15 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Stikeman Elliott, TELUS Communications Inc., Goodmans - Re: Application by Suite Systems Inc. for Access to Support Structure Utility Poles in the City of Calgary in respect of which TELUS Communications Inc. Exercises Rights of Access

2002/04/03 - Bell Intrigna Inc.

Description: Bell Intrigna Inc. ("Intrigna") is in receipt of two letters, dated March 5, 2002, from counsel for ENMAX Corporation ("EC"), ENMAX Energy Corporation ("EEC"), ENMAX Power Corporation ("EPC") and Enmax Envision Inc. ("Envision") (collectively "Enmax"), which, among other things, make additional submissions with respect to the above-referenced proceedings and set out a proposal for the disposition of these two proceedings. 
Document: 020403.doc - 37KB

2002/03/11 - Suite Systems Inc.
Description: We are in receipt of a letter, dated March 5, 2002, from counsel to Enmax Corporation ("EC"), Enmax Energy Corporation ("EEC"), Enmax Power Corporation ("EPC") and Enmax Envision Inc. ("Envision") (collectively, "the Enmax Companies") providing the Enmax Companies' response submissions in respect of a February 12, 2002 submission from SSI in this proceeding.
Document: 020311.doc - 101KB

2002/03/05 - Goodmans for ENMAX Corporation
Description: We are writing as counsel on behalf of ENMAX Corporation ("EC"), ENMAX Energy Corporation ("EEC"), ENMAX Power Corporation ("EPC") and ENMAX Envision Inc. ("Envision") further to Mr. Godin's procedural letter of February 6, 2002. These submissions are made without prejudice to EEC and EPC's jurisdictional objections and their submission concern the mootness of this application.
Document: 020305.zip - 65KB

2002/03/05 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS hereby files comments further to the Commission's direction on further process as set out in its letter of 6 February 2002.
Document: 020305.doc - 65KB

2002/02/13 - Goodmans for ENMAX Corporation - "Hard Copy Document"
 Description:  Kindly direct to us all communications, including correspondence and submission.  At our client's request, we ask that the Commission and parties refrain from copying directly Messrs.

2002/02/12 - Suite Systems Inc.
 Description: We write in accordance with a procedural directive in this proceeding from Paul Godin, Director Competition and Technology, Telecommunications, dated February 6, 2002 ("February 6th CRTC Procedural Directive").
Docudment: 020212.doc - 47KB

2002/02/07 - Goodmans for ENMAX Corporation
Description: Please find attached a cover letter and three agreements filed pursuant to the Commission's letters of February 6, 2002 in the above noted Part VII applications.
Document: 020207.zip - 2311KB

2002/02/06 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Telus Communications Inc., ENMAX Energy Corporation, ENMAX Envision Inc., Jonathan A. Blakey from Stikeman Elliott and Peter Ruby from Goodmans - Re: Application by Suite System Inc. for Access to Support Structure Utility Poles in the City of Calgary in respect of which Telus Communications Inc. Exercises Rights of Access - Further Process

2002/02/06 - Goodmans
 Description: Leanne Bennett, counsel for the Commission, requested by e-mail dated January 18, 2002 that ENMAX Corporation, ENMAX Energy Corporation ("EEC") and ENMAX Power Corporation ("EPC") provide to the Commission certain information.
Document: 020206.doc - 175KB

2002/01/22 - Goodmans
 Description: We are writing in response to Ms Bennett's e-mail of January 18, 2002 seeking to update our letter of January 7, 2002. For your convenience we enclose a copy of Ms. Bennett's e-mail.
Document: 020122.zip - 24KB

2002/01/07 - ENMAX Corporation (Goodmans)
 Description: We are writing to advise you on behalf of our clients, ENMAX Corporation, ENMAX Energy Corporation and ENMAX Power Corporation that a new corporate entity has been formed as a subsidiary of ENMAX Corporation, named ENMAX Envision Inc. ("Envision").
Document: 020107.zip - 70KB

2002/01/03 - Suite Systems Inc.
Description: We are in receipt of a letter, dated December 14, 2001, from counsel to Enmax Power Corporation ("EPC"), an intervenor in this proceeding, received at our offices via electronic mail on December 17, 2001.
Document: 020103.doc - 51KB

2001/12/14 - Goodmans for ENMAX Power Corporation
 Description: We are in receipt of letters from Mr. Blakey, counsel for Suite Systems Inc., to the Commission dated September 27, 2001, November 23, 2001 and December 3, 2001. 
Document: 011214.htm - 13KB

2001/12/03 - Suite Systems Inc.
 Description:  We are in receipt of an abridged response to Commission interrogatories from Telus, filed under cover of a letter, dated November 23, 2001, and two reports from Enmax Power Corporation ("EPC"), an intervenor in this proceeding, filed under cover of a letter from counsel to EPC also dated November 23, 2001
Document: 011203.doc - 179KB

2001/11/27 - TELUS Communications Inc. - "Hard Copy Document"
 Description:  TELUS is in receipt of a letter dated November 20, 2001 written by counsel for ENMAX Power Corporation ("ENMAX") requesting that the Commission dismiss the above noted application by Suite Systems Inc. and the Commission letter of November 22, 2001 in which the Commission invited TELUS to file a response to ENMAX's request.

2001/11/23 - Suite Systems Inc.
 Description: We are counsel to Suite Systems Inc. ("SSI") in the above-captioned proceeding. SSI is in receipt of a letter, dated November 20, 2001, from Peter Ruby, counsel to Enmax Power Corporation ("EPC"), an intervenor in this proceeding.
Document: 011123.doc - 133KB

2001/11/23 - Goodmans for ENMAX Power Corporation
 Description: Please find enclosed two reports in response to the report of Mr. Evans on behalf of Suite Systems, filed pursuant to Ms. Soehn's letter of October 31, 2001
Document: 011123.zip - 1324KB

2001/11/23 - TELUS Communications Inc.
 Description: In accordance with the procedure set out in the Commission letter of October 31, 2001, TELUS Communications Inc. ("TELUS") files herewith its responses to the CRTC interrogatories.
Document: 011123.zip - 620KB

top

2001/11/20 - Goodmans
 Description: We are writing to raise with the Commission a new development in this matter that ENMAX submits has brought to an end the support structure dispute Suite Systems had placed before the Commission.
Document: 011120.zip - 293KB

2001/10/31 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description:  Letter addressed to Elliott Stikeman, Telus Communications Inc. and Goodmans - Re:  In its 27 September 2001 reply in the above-noted application, Suite Systems Inc. (SSI) filed a report by W.E. Evans, P.Eng entitled Report on Attachment of Fibre Optic Cable by Suite Systems Inc. to Calgary Support Structures in Respect of Which Telus Exercises Rights of Access.

2001/10/03 - Suite Systems Inc.
 Description: We are counsel to Suite Systems Inc. ("SSI") in the above-captioned proceeding. SSI is in receipt of a letter, dated September 28, 2001, from Peter Ruby of Goodmans LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, counsel to the intervenor, Enmax Power Corporation ("EPC").
Document:  011003.doc - 132KB

2001/09/28 - Goodmans
 Description: We are in receipt of a letter to the Commission from Stikeman Elliott, counsel for Suite Systems Inc. ("SSI"), concerning the above-noted Part VII Application. This document purports to be a Reply to Telus' and ENMAX's Power Corporation's ("EPC") previously filed materials.
Document:  010928.doc - 173KB

2001/09/27 - Suite Systems Inc. (SSI)
 Description: We are counsel to Suite Systems Inc. ("SSI") in the above-captioned Part VII proceeding against Telus Communications Inc. ("Telus") relating to support structure utility poles in the City of Calgary in respect of which Telus exercises rights of access ("Application")
Document:  010927.zip - 144KB

2001/09/11 - TELUS Communications Inc.
 Description: By letter dated September 4, 2001, Suite Systems Inc. ("SSI") asks the Commission to deny parties an opportunity to comment on SSI's technical report.
Document:  010911.doc - 34KB

2001/09/06 - ENMAX Power Corporation
 Description: By letter dated August 15, 2001, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission ("CRTC" or the "Commission") directed that ENMAX Power Corporation ("EPC") file its submissions with regard to its intervention in Suite Systems Inc.'s ("SSI") Part VII Application against Telus Communications Inc. ("Telus").
Document:  010906.doc - 185KB

2001/09/04 - Suite Systems Inc.
 Description: We are counsel to Suite Systems Inc. ("SSI") in the above-captioned application ("Application") filed under Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure ("Rules"). SSI is in receipt of a letter, dated August 16, 2001, from Telus Communications Inc. ("Telus").
Document:  010904.doc - 37KB

2001/08/30 - Bell Intrigna - "Hard Copy Document"
Description:  Bell Intrigna Inc. ("Intrigna") is in receipt of a letter from the Commission dated 15 August 2001, in which, among other things, the Commission directed Telus Communication Inc. ("Telus") to file a copy of the following documents with the Commission in connection with the above-referenced proceeding.

top

2001/08/23 - TELUS Communications Inc. - "Hard Copy Document"
Description:  As directed by the Commission in its letter of August 15, 2001, TELUS hereby files an abridged version of the support structure agreement entered into by TELUS (formerly operating under the name of AGT Limited) and ENMAX (formerly operating under the name of the City of Calgary).

2001/08/16 - TELUS Communications Inc.
 Description: TELUS is in receipt of a letter dated August 10, 2001 written by counsel for Suite Systems Inc. ("SSI") requesting that the date for filing and service of SSI's Reply to be extended to September 3, 2001.
Document:  010816.doc - 36KB

2001/08/15 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
 Description: Letter addressed to Stikeman, Elliott, Telus Communications Inc. and Goodmans - Re: Application by Suite Systems Inc. for Access to Support Structure Utility Poles in the City of Calgary in respect of which Telus Communications Inc. Exercises Rights of Access

2001/08/10 - Suite Systems Inc.
 Description: We are counsel to Suite Systems Inc. ("SSI") in the above captioned-proceeding. SSI hereby requests that the deadline for filing and service of SSI's reply in this proceeding be extended to September 3, 2001. 
Document:  010810.doc - 26KB

2001/08/01 - TELUS Communications Inc.
 Description: TELUS Communications Inc. ("TELUS" or the "Company") is in receipt of an application by Suite Systems Inc. ("SSI") seeking access to support structure utility poles located in the City of Calgary.
Document:  010801.doc - 88KB

2001/07/27 - Goodmans - "Hard Copy Document"
Description:  We are in receipt of a letter dated July 25, 2001 addressed to the Commission by Mr. Blakey, counsel for Suite Systems Inc. ("SSI").  SSI objects to ENMAX Power Corporation's ("EPC") letter of intervention dated July 19, 2001.

2001/07/25 - Suite Systems Inc.
 Description: In accordance with section 61 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure ("Rules") SSI hereby provides its reply to the EPC intervention.
Document:  010725.doc - 35KB

2001/07/19 - ENMAX Power Corporation (Goodmans LLP) - "Hard Copy Document"
Description:  We are the solicitors for Enmax Power Corporation ("EPC") with regard to the above noted matter.  EPC intervenes in this matter pursuant to Section 66 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure as an interested person.

2001/07/10 - Suite Sytems Inc.
 Description: I write further to the above-captioned Part VII Application filed on behalf of our client, Suite Systems Inc. ("SSI"), against Telus Communications Inc. ("Telus"), dated July 3, 2001 ("Application"). The purpose of this letter is to update a factual matter referred to therein.
Document:  010710.doc - 26KB

2001/06/29 - Suite Systems Inc.
Description: In accordance with sections 27, 32, 37, 38, 42, 43, 52 and 60 of the Telecommunications Act and Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure ("the Rules"), Suite Systems Inc. hereby files the attached Application for orders providing access to support structure utility poles in the City of Calgary in respect of which Telus Communications Inc. ("Telus") exercises access rights.
Document:  010629.zip - 26KB

Date modified: