Review of conditions for approval of a local service request rejection charge: 8661-C12-201201384
NC 2012-72 - Call for comments - 2012-02-06
2012-09-28 - Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2012-523 Review of conditions for approval of a local service request rejection charge
File numbers: 8661-C12-201201384; 8633-E17-201108978; Bluewater TN 5; EastLink TN 30; Iristel TNs 6 and 6A; Videotron TN 39
2012-11-26 - Iristel Inc.
Description: Approved tariff page
Document: 1802291.pdf - 253KB
2012-05-24 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Rogers Communications Partnership (Rogers) herein files its comments with respect to the answers
received from interested parties in response to the Commission’s further request for information (RFI) dated
12 April 2012. Rogers is in receipt of answers to the RFI from Bell Canada, TELUS, MTS, Eastlink, Shaw,
Cogeco, Quebecor, SaskTel and IrisTel.
Document: 1721131.pdf - 57KB
2012-05-24 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the
Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies)
are in receipt of responses to Commission requests for information in the above noted proceeding. Pursuant to the
procedure set out by the Commission in its letter dated 27 April 2012, the Companies provide the following
comments to the information received.
Document: 1721129.doc - 78KB
2012-05-24 - MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with the process identified in a Commission staff letter of 27 April 2012, MTS Inc.
and Allstream Inc. (collectively, MTS Allstream) file these comments in response to additional information
filed by parties concerning Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2012-72 – Review of conditions for
approval of a Local Service Request rejection charge (TNC 2012-72).
Document: 1720975.pdf - 145KB
2012-05-18 - Québecor Média, au nom de sa filiale
Vidéotron
Description: Conformément aux directives du Conseil énoncées dans sa lettre
du 27 avril 2012, Québecor Média, au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron, soumet par la
présente ses réponses à des demandes de renseignements.
Document: 1719646.pdf - 361KB
2012-05-17 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt of interrogatories issued by
Commission staff on April 27, 2012 in relation to the above-noted proceeding. In accordance with the
instructions of Commission staff, TELUS files its responses to the interrogatories posed.
Document: 1719251.zip - 207KB
2012-05-17 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: In accordance with the procedure outlined in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2012-72, Proceeding
to review conditions for approval of a local service request rejection charge, Saskatchewan Telecommunications
(SaskTel) submits the following interrogatory responses.
Document: 1719327.zip - 86KB
2012-05-17 - Rogers Communications Partnership
Description: Please find enclosed the responses of Rogers Communications Partnership (Rogers) to the
Commission’s requests for information in the above-cited notice of consultation.
Document: 1719228.zip - 78KB
2012-05-17 - Shaw Telecom G.P. (Shaw)
Description: Shaw Telecom G.P. (Shaw) herein files responses to the Commission interrogatories received
27 April 2012.
Document: 1719159.zip - 299KB
2012-05-17 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively,
the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out by the Commission in its letter dated 27 April 2012, Bell
Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are attaching
their responses to the Commission's requests for information. Certain information contained in the Attachment
to The Companies(CRTC)27Apr12-2 TNC 2012-72 is filed in confidence with the Commission pursuant to section 39
of the Telecommunications Act and the directions provided by the Commission in the Appendix to
Broadcasting and Telecom Information Bulletin CRTC 2010-961, Disclosure Guidelines.
Document: 1719139.zip - 102KB
2012-05-17 - Bragg Communications Inc., carrying on business as EastLink
(“EastLink”)
Description: Pursuant to the process outlined in the Commission’s 27 April 2012 letter, Bragg
Communications Inc., carrying on business as EastLink (“EastLink”), is hereby providing its
interrogatory responses. Certain details have been filed confidentially pursuant to Section 39 of the
Telecommunications Act as they include operational information that Eastlink typically considers sensitive
and the disclosure of which could harm our position in the market. In these cases, Eastlink has filed an
abridged version for the public record.
Document: 1719095.zip - 186KB
2012-05-17 - MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc. (collectively MTS Allstream)
Description: In response to requests for information contained in a Commission staff letter of 27 April 2012,
MTS Inc. and Allstream Inc. (collectively MTS Allstream) provide the following responses:
Document: 1719055.zip - 307KB
2012-05-16 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) is in receipt of an interrogatory, dated 27 April 2012, from the
Commission in the above-noted proceedings. Pursuant to the CRTC directive, the response to this interrogatory
must be filed by 17 May 2012.
Document: 1718493.pdf - 28KB
2012-05-16 - Iristel
Description: Iristel submits its response to Telecom Notice of Consultation 2012-72 Interrogatories.
Document: 1718479.zip - 413KB
2012-04-27 - Commission Procedural Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Interrogatories with respect to Telecom Notice of
Consultation 2012-72, Review of conditions for approval of a local
service request rejection charge
- Date modified: