ARCHIVÉ - Transcription
Cette page Web a été archivée dans le Web
L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous.
Offrir un contenu dans les deux langues officielles
Prière de noter que la Loi sur les langues officielles exige que toutes publications gouvernementales soient disponibles dans les deux langues officielles.
Afin de rencontrer certaines des exigences de cette loi, les procès-verbaux du Conseil seront dorénavant bilingues en ce qui a trait à la page couverture, la liste des membres et du personnel du CRTC participant à l'audience et la table des matières.
Toutefois, la publication susmentionnée est un compte rendu textuel des délibérations et, en tant que tel, est transcrite dans l'une ou l'autre des deux langues officielles, compte tenu de la langue utilisée par le participant à l'audience.
TRANSCRIPT
OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE
THE
CANADIAN RADIO‑TELEVISION AND
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
TRANSCRIPTION
DES AUDIENCES DEVANT
LE
CONSEIL DE LA RADIODIFFUSION
ET
DES TÉLÉCOMMUNICATIONS CANADIENNES
SUBJECT/SUJET:
VARIOUS BROADCASTING APPLICATIONS /
PLUSIEURS DEMANDES EN RADIODIFFUSION
HELD AT: TENUE À:
Conference Centre Centre de conférences
Pontiac Room Salle Pontiac
Portage IV Portage IV
140 Promenade du Portage 140, promenade du Portage
Gatineau, Quebec Gatineau (Québec)
May 2, 2007 Le
2 mai 2007
Transcripts
In order to meet the requirements of the
Official Languages
Act, transcripts of proceedings before the
Commission will be
bilingual as to their covers, the listing of
the CRTC members
and staff attending the public hearings, and
the Table of
Contents.
However, the aforementioned publication is the
recorded
verbatim transcript and, as such, is taped and
transcribed in
either of the official languages, depending on
the language
spoken by the participant at the public
hearing.
Transcription
Afin de rencontrer les exigences de la Loi sur
les langues
officielles, les procès‑verbaux pour le
Conseil seront
bilingues en ce qui a trait à la page
couverture, la liste des
membres et du personnel du CRTC participant à
l'audience
publique ainsi que la table des matières.
Toutefois, la publication susmentionnée est un
compte rendu
textuel des délibérations et, en tant que tel,
est enregistrée
et transcrite dans l'une ou l'autre des deux
langues
officielles, compte tenu de la langue utilisée
par le
participant à l'audience publique.
Canadian
Radio‑television and
Telecommunications
Commission
Conseil
de la radiodiffusion et des
télécommunications
canadiennes
Transcript
/ Transcription
VARIOUS
BROADCASTING APPLICATIONS /
PLUSIEURS
DEMANDES EN RADIODIFFUSION
BEFORE / DEVANT:
Michel Arpin Chairperson
/ Président
Barbara Cram Commissioner
/ Conseillère
Andrée Noël Commissioner
/ Conseillère
ALSO PRESENT / AUSSI PRÉSENTS:
Jade Roy Secretary
/ Secrétaire
Francine Laurier-Guy Hearing Manager /
Gérante de l'audience
Valérie Lagacé Legal
Counsel /
Conseillère juridique
HELD AT: TENUE
À:
Conference Centre Centre de conférences
Pontiac Room Salle
Pontiac
Portage IV Portage
IV
140 Promenade du Portage 140, promenade du Portage
Gatineau, Quebec Gatineau (Québec)
May 2, 2007 Le
2 mai 2007
-
iv -
TABLE
DES MATIÈRES / TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
/ PARA
PHASE III
INTERVENTION PAR / INTERVENTION BY:
Aboriginal Voices Radio 711 / 4729
Richard Higgins Noël 734 / 4868
Ville de Vaudreuil-Dorion 739 / 4895
CLD Vaudreuil-Soulanges 747 / 4933
Conseil Culturel de Vaudreuil-Soulanges 753 / 4967
Communications Six Doigts 771 / 5094
André Turcot 782
/ 5159
AFFIRMED:
GURINDER SINGH
AFFIRMED:
DALJIT SINGH KALKAT
Gurinder Singh 784
/ 5180
Assemblée Parole et Actes 797 / 5252
-
v -
TABLE
DES MATIÈRES / TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
/ PARA
PHASE IV
RÉPLIQUE PAR / REPLY BY:
Communications Média Évangélique 802 / 5284
AFFIRMED:
JASVIR SINGH SANDHU
Radio Humsafar 806
/ 5318
S.S. TV Inc. 820
/ 5432
International Harvesters for Christ 834 / 5521
Evangelistic Association
Neeti P. Ray 839
/ 5546
René Ferron 844
/ 5570
Hellenic canadien câble radio 852 / 5619
Yves Sauvé 861
/ 5676
-
vi -
TABLE
DES MATIÈRES / TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
/ PARA
PHASE I
PRÉSENTATION PAR / PRESENTATION BY:
Lee David Weston 876 / 5771
PHASE II
INTERVENTION PAR / INTERVENTION BY:
Rogers Cable Communications 936 / 6223
PHASE III
RÉPLIQUE PAR / REPLY BY:
Lee David Weston 948 / 6296
Gatineau, Quebec / Gatineau (Québec)
‑‑‑ Upon commencing on Wednesday, May 2, 2007
at 0835 / L'audience débute le mercredi
2 mai 2007 à 08 h 35
LISTNUM 1 \l 1 \s 47174717 THE CHAIRPERSON: Good morning. This morning we will first hear AVR ‑‑ good morning, gentlemen. Then following the AVR presentation, we will move to Phase III of the public hearing.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14718 It is at the request of the Commission that Aboriginal Voices Radio is appearing at this public hearing. The Commission has requested their presence in order to clarify some technical questions arising from the applications that are requesting the use of the 106.3 MHz frequency. For the same reason, the Commission has requested the attendance of the engineers of the applicants.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14719 AVR is currently operating a radio station in Montréal using the frequency 106.7 MHz, Channel 294A. AVR has an authority to operate with a maximum effective radiated power of 1200 watts, average ERP of 320 watts. AVR is currently operating on a temporary authority from a temporary site with an ERP of 16 watts.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14720 The frequency 106.3 MHz is considered to be second adjacent frequency to the one used by AVR. Operation of a second adjacent frequency could present some technical problems.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14721 As well, it is noted that some broadcasters when faced with significant interference applied to the Commission and to the Department of Industry for an increase in effective radiated power in order to minimize interference zones.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14722 In this case, because the frequencies are second adjacent, if one broadcaster is successful in increasing the effective radiated power, he will simply increase the interference zone of the broadcaster using the second adjacent frequency. The latter listeners will have increased reception problems, thus an increase in ERP for one broadcaster creates problems for the other.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14723 As well, in offering services to their listeners, it is not known what plans broadcasters have, if any, to address issues related to interference of listeners simply not receiving the intended programming.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14724 AVR, as I said earlier, is currently operating from a temporary site. Considering that in this case operation of a second adjacent frequency requires site collocation, it is not known whether AVR and the applicants have an agreement in place to collation on a permanent site.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14725 In December 2006, the Commission, through broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2006‑160, revised its policy on digital radio broadcasting and provided broadcasters with the opportunity to implement radio stations using In‑band on‑channel, also known as IBOC or HD radio technology.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14726 This is subject to approval by the Department of Industry.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14727 Should IBOC be implemented, stations operating on a second adjacent frequency will suffer additional interference and a higher percentage of receivers will be unable to receive the signal.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14728 Gentlemen, welcome. I understand that you have prepared some introductory remarks, so we will hear them and then I will follow with some questions.
INTERVENTION
LISTNUM 1 \l 14729 MR. HILL: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14730 Good morning, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission and staff. It is a pleasure for us to be here with you again.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14731 For the record, my name is Jamie Hill and I am the CEO of Aboriginal Voices Radio Inc.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14732 With me today, on my right, are Roy Hennessey, CEO of AVR; on my left, Bob Wood, long‑time consultant to AVR; on his left, Jim Moltner, consulting engineer to AVR; and on my far right Mr. Luc Lainé, who is a member of the Board of Directors of AVR.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14733 As you know, AVR is not an applicant in this process, nor did it file an intervention. It did, however, receive a request from the Commission last week, from the Panel, to appear today to discuss certain technical issues relating to several of the applications for new FM radio stations in Montréal. We are pleased to respond to your questions in that regard following our presentation.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14734 We also think it might be helpful to place in context AVR's Montréal situation.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14735 On July 2, 2003 the CRTC approved an application by AVR for a licence to operate a station in Montréal. However, the Commission denied AVR's request for the use of 100.1 MHz, Channel 261A, and directed AVR to submit an amendment proposing the use of another frequency.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14736 AVR subsequently submitted an application proposing the use of 106.7, which was second adjacent to the frequency being applied for by International Harvesters for Christ Evangelistic Association Inc. or IH. Both parties agreed to enter into the agreement with the intent of cost‑sharing on the antenna system.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14737 AVR further agreed to enter into this arrangement as a cost‑saving measure, since rent from IH for use of the tower would help to subsidize AVR's rent. As it turned out, the Commission denied IH's application to carry on the operation of a radio broadcast transmitting undertaking at 106.3, but it did approve AVR as an amendment to use 106.7.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14738 Last summer, AVR agreed to provide a waiver to IH and other applicants applying for the second adjacent 106.3. Although the waivers in question were never signed, AVR wishes to repeat for the record its willingness, assuming the CRTC is in agreement with the plan and subject to the comments that follow, to provide such a waiver to a successful applicant for 106.3 in Montréal should you see fit to grant a licence.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14739 That said, AVR has carefully read the Commission's letter of April 25, 2007 which invited it to appear here today. AVR has no desire to cause any difficulties in terms of the Commission's digital radio transitioning policies by creating a precedent relating to second adjacencies if that is not the Commission's wish.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14740 As it stands, if the Commission were to license one of the applicants proposing to use 106.3, AVR's waiver currently makes no provision for remedial measures that the successful applicant would have to carry out if interference problems were to arise, nor does it contain any provision for a dispute mechanism to resolve such matters.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14741 Upon reflection, it occurs to AVR that if there were to be complaints relating to interference, it could pose an irritant down the road for the Commission, as well as for the parties, as listeners would well target the CRTC with their complaints.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14742 For that reason, and in light of the Commission's letter, AVR has a solution to recommend. While we do not anticipate any difficulties, and while we wish to continue to provide the waiver as previously indicated, we would respectfully request that this could be solved through the Commission's licensing process.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14743 We believe the Commission should impose a condition of licence on a successful applicant to 106.3 that indicates the following: If the new entrant cannot resolve to AVR's satisfaction any technical issues relating to the reception of AVR's second adjacent signal, whether an IBOC or a conventional mode, the successful applicant will agree to search for another frequency.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14744 The Commission should require that an agreement with respect to the use of a second adjacent signal should be entered into between AVR and a successful applicant in that regard. This approach would allow the Commission to proceed with licensing at this hearing as gazetted, but yet would offer the Commission and AVR some protection in the case of possible unanticipated interference.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14745 We would be pleased to respond to any questions you might have.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14746 THE CHAIRPERSON: Thank you very much, Mr. Hill.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14747 I will direct the questions you, but at your convenience you may ask anyone in your group to answer the question.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14748 My first question has to do with, obviously, as we have already said, you are currently on a temporary site. Could you tell us what are your plans to find out and if you have already come to some agreement to find a more permanent site?
LISTNUM 1 \l 14749 MR. HILL: Mr. Chairman, I would like to ask Bob Wood to respond to that first.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14750 MR. WOOD: Mr. Chairman, we are in negotiation right now with McGill Laurentian to utilize the rooftop at the Stock Exchange Tower in Montréal. That negotiation has been going on now for at least six months. We are very close to the completion of that negotiation. We actually hope that the agreement can be signed within the next two weeks. We are cleaning up a few minor details, but we are very confident that that deal will be completed very shortly.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14751 THE CHAIRPERSON: When do you think you will be moving from your current site?
LISTNUM 1 \l 14752 MR. WOOD: The engineers have indicated that the first step, once the deal is in place, is that an existing tower on the rooftop owned by Rogers has to be taken down and then our tower would go up in its place.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14753 So assuming we can get the approvals from the City of Montréal to do that quickly, I would say it would be within ‑‑ the engineers would say it would be within 90 to 120 days after that; so probably September 1.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14754 THE CHAIRPERSON: At the end of the summer or early fall you think you will be transmitting from your definitive site?
LISTNUM 1 \l 14755 MR. WOOD: Yes.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14756 THE CHAIRPERSON: Obviously if the agreement with McGill Laurentian is finally signed and agreed by all parties. That is an obvious issue.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14757 Mr. Moltner has attended the hearing for the last two days so he is quite aware of the plans of all the applicants for the frequency, who have said that they will be collocating with you, International Harvester being one, and the second one being Mr. Neeti. And two others are ‑‑ well, one is applying for Vaudreuil‑Dorion and the other one, who also is applying in Montréal, is looking at a site on Mount Royal, on a tower owned by Bell on the top of Mount Royal.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14758 As I said in my introductory remarks and what engineers have been telling me, it is a case of second adjacent could allow the collocation. It seems to be working because it has been implemented somewhere else.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14759 I don't know what your views are regarding the problems that could occur if they are not collocated, since we have two applicants who are planning. Obviously one is planning to implement its infrastructure outside the City of Montréal.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14760 MR. MOLTNER: The applicant for Vaudreuil‑Dorion should not be considered anything unconventional as far as second adjacent goes because their transmitter site is outside of AVR's coverage contours. So it is a standard application in terms of Industry Canada rules.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14761 The other applicant, Canadian Hellenic, I believe is proposing to locate on the Bell tower on Mount Royal. AVR actually did look at that tower.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14762 Montréal is kind of a unique situation in that if you are not on Mount Royal, particularly on the CBC site, you are going to have coverage problems somewhere due to the fact that there is a big bump in the middle of the city.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14763 The Bell tower is somewhat west on Mount Royal and therefore we expect there would be some shadowing in the downtown from that site.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14764 In addition, the major protection for the 106.3 frequency, as well as 106.7, is toward Saint‑Hyacinthe, which I'm sure was dear to your heart at one point, Mr. Chairman, and therefore the power has to be pulled back drastically in that direction.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14765 Therefore, we feel that from the Bell tower on Mount Royal coverage in the downtown core will suffer. That is why we looked for an alternative site, which was the 800 Victoria Square site.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14766 From that site we believe the coverage into downtown will be much better. There will be some shadowing, however, north of the mountain obviously.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14767 So it is a trade‑off and it is a case of one site is 51 percent and the other site is 49 percent.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14768 However, to answer your question specifically, the waiver which AVR gave to all the applicants stated that the 106.3 applicant must be collocated with AVR at a site which is at AVR's discretion. So I believe that if the licence is awarded to Canadian Hellenic, we will have to negotiate collocating on the Victoria site with them.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14769 THE CHAIRPERSON: So that is the position that AVR is taking. Obviously that is not the plan that CHCR filed with both Industry Canada and with the CRTC. As our coverage maps are showing, they are located on the Bell tower.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14770 So I am asking you, Mr. Moltner, in your capacity as engineer for AVR in this instance, because I understand that you also are the engineer for International Harvester. But in your capacity as consultant to AVR, we were told yesterday by the engineer for CHCR that not collocating will also work well. They made the argument that they were not collocating with the CBC, which is using the frequency 104.7, and they are on 105.1 out of the same tower.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14771 So what is your professional advice to them?
LISTNUM 1 \l 14772 MR. MOLTNER: Well, like I said, the way it stands now is the waiver was provided on the basis of collocating at AVR's discretion. Non‑collated second adjacents do work as well. We have them all over the country. Given that they are proposing to collocate in a park when there is very little population, it is very possible that it would work in terms of not causing interference with AVR. There is a greater possibility that AVR would cause interference to them since AVR is located in a very populated area.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14773 So while I'm not saying it's okay, it is at AVR's discretion. But I can see them allowing Canadian Hellenic to locate on the Mount Royal site on the condition that they do not cause interference to AVR and they accept whatever interference they get due to the fact that they decided not to collocate.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14774 MR. WOOD: Mr. Chairman, if I could add to that, I think this is a very complex matter and it simply underlines why it would be helpful if the Commission would be kind enough to consider a condition of licence that any applicant licensed on the second adjacent to AVR be required to enter into a negotiation with us to ensure that if there is ‑‑ which is not expected, but if there is interference to AVR or any problem whatsoever, that they will take remedial measures right up to and including moving to another frequency if necessary.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14775 THE CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. Wood.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14776 Yesterday we also had a discussion regarding interference to some types of receivers. I know that you, yourself, made some comments on behalf of clients that you had yesterday that the level of interference on the less expensive type of receivers was somehow minimal.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14777 Could you elaborate more on that topic?
LISTNUM 1 \l 14778 MR. MOLTNER: Well, based on the results of all the receiver tests I have seen, which generally cover the full gamut of receivers available, from the very cheapest to the most expensive, even on the cheapest receivers the protection ratios are such that a collocated second adjacent should work.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14779 I don't know if that answers your question.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14780 THE CHAIRPERSON: If you had listeners that were complaining that they were not able to get your signal because of interference on their receivers, have you thought about the mechanism of how to help them whatsoever?
LISTNUM 1 \l 14781 MR. MOLTNER: Well, the mechanism is pretty standard because, as I believe I said yesterday, this is not only a second adjacent phenomenon, it is also a third adjacent and a fourth adjacent phenomenon. The very cheapest receivers which happened to be located very close to the transmitting site can be overloaded, it is true. It happens all the time when people sign on.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14782 The general way to address it is to just do a public relations thing where you visit the person. If their antenna is oriented improperly or something, you help them with that, and if ‑‑
LISTNUM 1 \l 14783 THE CHAIRPERSON: Sometimes it is only moving the receiver around?
LISTNUM 1 \l 14784 MR. MOLTNER: You can move the receiver by one foot and it fixes it.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14785 THE CHAIRPERSON: Yes, exactly.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14786 MR. MOLTNER: If that doesn't work, you have made a deal with Best Buy and you provide them with a better receiver.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14787 We do it every time we sign on with a station, whether there is a second adjacent or a third adjacent or even no adjacents.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14788 THE CHAIRPERSON: I see. Is AVR ready to make such a commitment?
LISTNUM 1 \l 14789 MR. WOOD: I think that AVR would be prepared to, Mr. Chairman, but we wouldn't see that necessarily as our responsibility. If we sign on, we are signed on. If we create a problem by signing on, we certainly would make that commitment.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14790 But indeed if there is a problem created to us, that should be the obligation of the new entrant.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14791 THE CHAIRPERSON: Thank you for the answer.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14792 Finally, we also had some discussion regarding IBOC and the implementation of IBOC on second adjacent signal. If down the road IBOC becomes also a Canadian standard and is widely implemented across land, we understand that IBOC implementation for second adjacent services could be or are problematic.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14793 Do you have any specific views about IBOC implementation, on the one hand, and the plans that AVR may have down the road to go to IBOC?
LISTNUM 1 \l 14794 MR. MOLTNER: I will take the interference part, and as far as future plans I guess ‑‑
LISTNUM 1 \l 14795 THE CHAIRPERSON: Leave it to the gentlemen of AVR.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14796 MR. MOLTNER: Leave it to the planners, yes.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14797 THE CHAIRPERSON: Yes.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14798 MR. MOLTNER: From the test results I have seen which, which first of all are the CBC tests which they did on IBOC last summer, the protection ratios between two second adjacent stations, both running an IBOC or just one running IBOC, are very similar to the protection ratios between two second adjacent stations simply running analog.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14799 Therefore, if the collocated analog works, the collocated IBOC should also work.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14800 I have also just recently reviewed some tests done in the U.S. and they are even painting a rosier picture in that the protection ratios can be much relaxed relative to what the current Canadian standards are.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14801 So to answer your question, I believe that two stations running IBOC can co‑exist.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14802 And if there is a problem, you have to understand that the IBOC technology in theory puts all of the digital energy in the first adjacent channel. In theory, there should be no interference in the second adjacent channel.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14803 Of course, that is theory and in reality things aren't perfect and there is always a little bit of spillover. But what I'm saying is that with additional filtering or what have you at the source, any such problem I believe could be solved.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14804 MR. WOOD: Mr. Chairman, beyond the technical part of it, we entered into the second adjacent agreement as a practical matter. It was a way for us to help subsidize the rental and other costs in establishing in Montréal.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14805 The IBOC matter is a bit of a moot point with us because we think it might be a while yet before IBOC is introduced, if it is introduced.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14806 Second, we are not sure, in any event, that IBOC will ever become a practical reality and broadcasting in Canada.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14807 I go back to the days of AM stereo. I was with CHUM at that time. I was the National Program Director and then General Manager of the CHUM stations at that time. We were the first station in Canada to adopt AM stereo. Many broadcasters in the country installed AM stereo equipment, but the broadcasters did not come together in a consolidated effort to market properly AM stereo to the consumer.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14808 As a result, it went nowhere.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14809 So if the broadcasters now in the country don't do anything to promote IBOC properly, I don't think that there is a very good chance that it will become a practical, ongoing, widespread, actively accepted opportunity for listeners.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14810 Mr. Hennessy can add to that comment.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14811 MR. HENNESSY: The period of about three years prior to becoming associated with AVR, my agency, Hennessy & Bray Communications in Toronto, was the marketing arm of what was called DRRI, Digital Radio Rollout Inc. Am I bringing back memories?
LISTNUM 1 \l 14812 We worked for three years quite energetically and enthusiastically about introducing DAB. We negotiated ‑‑ we were part of the negotiation and planning with General Motors for the rollout of vehicles with GM.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14813 We dealt with manufacturers in England, coordinated a visit from Taiwanese to Toronto to meet with Radio Shack and we worked with Radio Shack for an extended period of time to finally get receivers into the country.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14814 It was a struggle to get to that point. All the while we were watching what was happening in England in particular and the rapid adoption of DAB there. The striking difference between the two was that it was unlimited content allowed in Great Britain as opposed to here where we were limited to 14 hours a week of unique programming.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14815 That combined with, as Bob pointed out, a cautiousness on the part of the existing broadcasters to move forward and a reluctance to really commit significant resources ‑‑ because it would take something significant to address public attitude, and this is before iPods ‑‑ it was just an unsuccessful venture taking it forward.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14816 Although it is there today, little attention is paid to it and no one that I know of is predicting its sudden resurgence.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14817 We view IBOC in the same cautious manner. It is interesting. It obviously would offer potential with similar to SCMO opportunities, perhaps better quality. All of these things are what ifs. The big thing is will it move forward and I have seen nothing at this point to convince me that it will be more than what DAB has been, an AM stereo in the past.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14818 MR. WOOD: I think also, as a general matter, the second adjacent frequencies can be used to allow new voices to be heard in Canadian broadcasting. If we become preoccupied with the potential problem of IBOC to the detriment of new voices, we don't think that that is necessarily the best way to go. We think the best way to go is to liberate spectrum so that new voices can be heard.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14819 THE CHAIRPERSON: Thank you.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14820 Mr. French.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14821 COMMISSIONER FRENCH: I would just like to recapitulate, just to be absolutely clear, what I understand to be AVR's position with respect to the only applicant who chooses to site an antenna within your coverage area but not co‑locate it with yourselves.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14822 The position is that you are not sufficiently certain or desirous of blocking the possibility of a new signal, you are not sufficiently certain that there will be a difficulty that you wish to rule that possibility out completely, notwithstanding the fact that there will be no subsidy to AVR because there will be no co‑location.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14823 Your position is that with respect to that broadcaster that if that broadcaster creates a problem for your signal, that broadcaster will be obliged to make the technical adjustments necessary to correct that, and if you create a problem for that broadcaster's signal, that is not your problem, that is the problem of the other broadcaster.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14824 Is that a fair way of stating your position?
LISTNUM 1 \l 14825 MR. WOOD: We think that is a fair statement, yes.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14826 COMMISSIONER FRENCH: Thank you very much.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14827 THE CHAIRPERSON: Legal counsel.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14828 MS LAGACÉ: Yes, I want you to clarify if you could whether the condition of licence would be a condition of licence on an ongoing basis or actually a condition for approval of the licence of a new entrant.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14829 MR. WOOD: Could you repeat that, please? Sorry.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14830 MS LAGACÉ: I would just want you to clarify whether you see this condition of licence that you are proposing as a condition for the Commission approving the licence or issuing the licence or if you see that condition applicable to the seven years of the licence to be issued.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14831 MR. WOOD: I think as a condition for approving the licence.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14832 MS LAGACÉ: Thank you.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14833 THE CHAIRPERSON: Gentlemen, thank you very much for coming to meet ‑‑
LISTNUM 1 \l 14834 COMMISSIONER FRENCH: Excuse me. I don't think that you have got the answer to your question. Look what it says:
"The Commission should impose a condition of licence (on a successful applicant)."
LISTNUM 1 \l 14835 Therefore, it is not required for approval, it is actually a condition of licence that we are being asked to include in the licence should we choose on other grounds to issue it.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14836 MS LAGACÉ: Maybe I can clarify because there is a possibility for the Commission to impose conditions to the issuance of a licence, so the service can be authorized but for the licence to be issued there could be a condition such as this one and there could be also a condition attached to the operation of the licence once the station is on air.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14837 So I just want to know which one of those that you are requiring or you see the Commission imposing.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14838 THE CHAIRPERSON: And which is ongoing for ‑‑
LISTNUM 1 \l 14839 MS LAGACÉ: The life of the licence.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14840 THE CHAIRPERSON: ‑‑ for the life of the licence and it could even be renewed if need be.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14841 COMMISSIONER FRENCH: That means in fact that if you say it is a prelude to the issuing of the licence, it is not ongoing.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14842 I only make that point to you so you can give an answer that we are all clear on what it means.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14843 MR. WOOD: Thank you for clarifying that, Commissioner.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14844 We obviously ‑‑ we hope that it would be ongoing and we actually are hoping that the Commission, given the importance of AVR, that the Commission will help to protect AVR by ensuring that whatever results from your deliberations in this process that AVR will be protected in light of any eventuality that might arise.
LISTNUM 1 \l 14845 MS LAGACÉ: Then I have a subsidiary question that follows this one.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14846 My question is: What would you see happening during the
period when an application is filed by a licensee to change a frequency and the
time that the Commission can deal with the application and dispose of it? Do you see that the operation of this new station would continue during
that time?
LISTNUM
1 \l 14847 MR.
WOOD: I think that that would be
something that we would have to discuss with the applicant in the negotiation.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14848 My
sense is that if it wasn't severe then they should be allowed to continue but
if it is severe they should be required to go dark if necessary until they go
through the process for a new frequency.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14849 MS
LAGACÉ: Those are my questions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14850 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Well, gentlemen, Mr. Hill,
Mr. Hennessy, Mr. Wood, Mr. Moltner, Mr. Lainé, thank you very much for
coming this morning at the request of the Commission. It was very appreciated. It helps us in our deliberations.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14851 We
will now move to the third part of this public hearing. Thank you very much.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14852 MR.
HILL: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14853 LA
SECRÉTAIRE : Nous procéderons maintenant à la Phase III, où les autres parties
interviennent dans l'ordre énoncé sur l'ordre du jour, afin de présenter leur
intervention.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14854 Je
demanderais aux quatre prochains intervenants de s'avancer à la table de
présentation :
LISTNUM
1 \l 14855 ‑
M. Richard Higgins Noël;
LISTNUM
1 \l 14856 ‑
la Ville de Vaudreuil‑Dorion;
LISTNUM
1 \l 14857 ‑
le CLD de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges; et
LISTNUM
1 \l 14858 ‑
le Conseil Culturel de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14859 CONSEILLER
FRENCH : Madame la secrétaire, pouvez‑vous rappeler à l'auditoire qu'il
faut fermer les mobiles?
LISTNUM
1 \l 14860 LA
SECRÉTAIRE : Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14861 Lorsque
vous êtes dans la salle d'audience, on vous demande d'éteindre vos téléphones
cellulaires, téléavertisseurs et BlackBerry, car ils risquent d'importuner les
participants et les membres du Conseil, et ils causent de l'interférence au
système de communication utilisé, notamment, par les traducteurs.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14862 Nous
comptons sur votre collaboration à cet égard durant toute la journée. Merci.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14863 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: Jade, you can repeat it in
English.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14864 THE
SECRETARY: When you are in the hearing
room, we would ask you to please turn off your cell phones, beepers and
BlackBerrys as they are an unwelcome distraction and they cause interference on
the internal communication systems used by our translators.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14865 We
would appreciate your cooperation in this regard throughout the day. Thanks.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 14866 LA
SECRÉTAIRE : Nous commencerons avec M. Richard Higgins Noël.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14867 S'il
vous plaît vous identifier, et vous avez 10 minutes pour votre
présentation. Merci.
INTERVENTION
LISTNUM
1 \l 14868 M.
NOEL : Alors, Monsieur le président et membres du personnel du CRTC, mon nom
est Richard Higgins Noël. Je me qualifie
de professionnel de l'information, presse parlée, presse écrite.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14869 Je
vais, donc, brièvement mettre l'accent sur cet aspect, un secteur où j'ai
consacré de nombreuses années de ma vie.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14870 Je
compte plus d'une quarantaine d'années d'expérience dans ce domaine. La radio constitue un élément très
significatif de ma carrière. Ainsi, j'ai
travaillé pour le compte de plusieurs médias électroniques de petite, moyenne
et grande taille.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14871 J'estime,
donc, être compétent pour émettre des opinions valables en regard du dossier
qui nous occupe, opinions soulevées dans un mémoire maintenant entre vos mains,
entre les mains du CRTC.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14872 Je
m'intéresse depuis longtemps au service radiophonique desservant les
différentes régions du Québec. Comme
vous, au fil des ans, j'ai constaté les graves conséquences de la concentration
de ces mêmes services entre les mains de grandes entreprises, une situation qui
semble vous préoccuper grandement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14873 Comme
vous le savez, il reste peu de stations radiophoniques indépendantes sur le
territoire québécois, ce qui, à mon avis, est fort déplorable. Par conséquent, considérant le contexte
actuel, je suis heureux d'appuyer la demande faite par M. Yves Sauvé pour un
poste de radio qui desservirait Vaudreuil‑Dorion et ses villes sours.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14874 Comme
bien d'autres citoyens et organismes de la région de Vaudreuil‑Dorion, je
déplore vivement l'absence d'une station radiophonique pouvant alimenter ce
même territoire. Malgré le fait que la
région soit inondée par plusieurs postes de radio montréalais, il faut
reconnaître qu'elle est totalement ignorée par ceux‑ci.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14875 Par
exemple, les nouvelles locales, propres à Vaudreuil‑Dorion et à ses
villes sours, n'existent pas. En 2007,
il s'agit de l'une des rares régions ne possédant pas une station
radiophonique.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14876 Nous
sommes en présence d'une situation aberrante, surtout en matière de couverture
des événements qui surviennent dans cette région. Un service d'information, comme le prévoit,
notamment, la demande de M. Yves Sauvé, viendrait corriger ce grand vide, et
cela au profit des municipalités concernées.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14877 Ainsi
donc, ce projet de monsieur Sauvé arrive à point, à mon avis. Sa réalisation permettrait à une population
d'être informée sur ce qui se passe régulièrement chez elle.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14878 Il
suffit de penser, notamment, aux conseils municipaux et aux activités de
différents organismes oeuvrant sur le territoire en question.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14879 Sur
ce plan, comme sur bien d'autres, ces gens sont pénalisés par la situation
actuelle. Dans le présent contexte, ils
apprennent par les deux hebdomadaires locaux, des médias qui appartiennent à la
même entreprise, certains faits touchant leur région, et cela une semaine après
leur avènement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14880 Si
j'ai bien compris, le projet de monsieur Sauvé propose un service radiophonique
quotidien. Un journaliste à plein temps
couvrirait en semaine l'actualité locale et régionale, ce qui me semble
raisonnable, compte tenu de la technologie moderne et de la proximité des municipalités
appelées à être desservies.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14881 Je
constate également qu'il y aurait en fin de semaine deux surnuméraires, des
animateurs polyvalents qui sont familiers aussi avec l'information et qui sont
en mesure de faire la lecture des bulletins de nouvelles en ondes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14882 Également,
le journaliste qui travaillerait en semaine à temps plein préparerait, en plus
de ses tâches habituelles, préparerait, dis‑je, l'agenda du week‑end.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14883 Maintenant,
les deux surnuméraires, si on peut les qualifier comme ça, en fin de semaine,
s'occuperaient de faire une revue de l'actualité de la semaine.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14884 Je
note également que la station radiophonique, en appui à ce journaliste,
pourrait compter sur des collaborateurs à ce niveau de la couverture des
événements. Mentionnons les agents
d'information, les porte‑parole officiels des comités de citoyens et des
entreprises, des organismes socioculturels, des services policiers et
d'incendie, et caetera, et caetera.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14885 Je
ne suis pas surpris de l'intérêt que porte les divers milieux de la région de
Vaudreuil‑Dorion à l'endroit du projet de monsieur Sauvé. Sous la gouvernance de monsieur Sauvé, qui
opérerait et administrerait au quotidien la station radiophonique, il
m'apparaît que les intérêts de la région de Vaudreuil‑Dorion seraient
entre bonnes mains.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14886 Monsieur
Sauvé, je l'ai vu à l'ouvre à CKVL Montréal durant plusieurs années. Il est un homme expérimenté de l'industrie de
la radio, un élément déterminant dans ce dossier. Selon moi, cet homme propose un bel avenir
aux résidants de la région.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14887 En
conclusion, ce projet est sérieux et crédible.
Pour toutes les raisons invoquées plus tôt, le CRTC poserait un geste
concret en faveur des intérêts de ces citoyens en approuvant un projet qui
viendrait en quelque sorte satisfaire les besoins criants de la région qu'ils
habitent.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14888 Je
vous remercie de m'avoir entendu et d'avoir pris acte du mémoire que je vous ai
déjà soumis au sujet de la demande de M. Yves Sauvé.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14889 Monsieur
le président et membres du personnel du CRTC, je vous souhaite une bonne
réflexion dans ce dossier.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14890 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Merci, Monsieur Noël.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14891 On
va entendre les autres intervenants, et nous aurons des questions après pour
vous.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14892 LA
SECRÉTAIRE : Merci.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14893 Maintenant,
je demanderais à la Ville de Vaudreuil‑Dorion.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14894 S'il
vous plaît, vous identifier, et vous avez 10 minutes pour votre
présentation. Merci.
INTERVENTION
LISTNUM
1 \l 14895 M.
GABRIELE : Monsieur le président, madame, messieurs les commissaires, membres
du personnel du Conseil, mon nom est Raynald Gabriele, maire suppléant et
conseiller municipal de la municipalité de Vaudreuil‑Dorion.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14896 Je
représente, aujourd'hui, le conseil municipal, qui, à l'unanimité, appuie la
demande de M. Yves Sauvé pour l'implantation d'une nouvelle station FM
commercial à Vaudreuil‑Dorion.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14897 La
Ville de Vaudreuil‑Dorion, créée le 16 mars 1994, est sise sur les rives
de la rivière Outaouais et du lac des Deux‑Montagnes. Son immense territoire de 73 kilomètres
carrés la classe parmi les cinq plus grandes municipalités au Québec.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14898 Issue
de la fusion de la Ville de Vaudreuil et de la Ville de Dorion, Vaudreuil‑Dorion
est la capitale de la MRC de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges. Comptant plus de 24 589 habitants, elle
regroupe tous les services gouvernementaux et communautaires qui desservent la
région.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14899 Vaudreuil‑Dorion
dégage une vitalité commerciale et industrielle avec ses centaines de commerces
et places d'affaires, centres commerciaux, parcs industriels, sans oublier sa
vie culturelle et sportive très intense.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14900 Il
nous fait plaisir de souligner que notre ville a proposé sa candidature pour
devenir l'hôte des Jeux du Québec en 2010.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14901 Au
Québec, Vaudreuil‑Dorion est probablement la ville qui s'apprête à
connaître l'essor le plus fulgurant des villes de la région métropolitaine pour
les dix prochaines années.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14902 Il
est certain que l'arrivée d'une nouvelle station de radio FM tombe à point, au
moment où notre région connaît une effervescence sans précédent.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14903 Un
article du journal * Les Affaires + de mai 2006 a décrit la région de
Vaudreuil‑Soulanges comme étant le nouvel eldorado québécois avec une
situation économique exceptionnelle et un taux de chômage minime.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14904 Nous
nous joignons aujourd'hui à nos villes sours et à tous leurs résidents, à la
Chambre de Commerce de Vaudreuil‑Dorion, au CLD, à la MRC de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges,
au Regroupement des associations des gens d'affaires, au Conseil culturel de
Vaudreuil‑Soulanges, à la Corporation de développement communautaire, à
la Commission scolaire des Trois‑Lacs, aux associations de sport amateur,
aux organismes culturels, aux artistes et créateurs pour unanimement demander
au CRTC d'accorder la fréquence 106,3 FM à Vaudreuil‑Dorion.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14905 Notre
région, malgré son importance, ne dispose d'aucune station radiophonique. Aucune station de radio, ni de Montréal, ni
de Valleyfield ou d'ailleurs, ne se préoccupe de ce qui se passe vraiment
chez nous.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14906 A
part les deux hebdos régionaux, nous constatons que les activités ou événements
se déroulant dans notre région, qu'ils soient politiques, économiques,
culturels ou communautaires, bénéficient de façon générale d'une couverture
médiatique déficiente.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14907 Les
campagnes électorales municipales, les séances des conseils municipaux et
autres événements d'importance ne sont nullement couverts par les stations de
radio qui ne s'intéressent pas à ce qui se vit dans notre région.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14908 Notre
secteur a plus que jamais besoin d'une radio locale, d'une radio de proximité,
d'une station connectée sur les populations.
Nous désirons une station impliquée dans sa communauté par la diffusion
de bulletins de nouvelles et par ses émissions d'affaires publiques locales
axées sur les préoccupations du milieu; une station radiophonique qui produit
des émissions locales permettant à la population de faire entendre ses opinions
et de partager ses idées sur les enjeux locaux et régionaux, ce qui contribuera
à renforcer son sentiment d'appartenance et permettra aux citoyens de
contribuer davantage à son essor.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14909 C'est
exactement ce que propose le requérant, monsieur Yves Sauvé, avec son projet
d'implantation d'une nouvelle station de radio FM à Vaudreuil‑Dorion qui
créera plusieurs emplois dans notre région.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14910 Nous
avons besoin d'une radio en cas d'urgence.
Actuellement, Vaudreuil‑Dorion et ses villes sours ne peuvent
compter que sur les médias écrits sur une base hebdomadaire pour informer ses
populations.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14911 Notre
région ne dispose d'aucun moyen de communication privilégié, d'aucun média
local quotidien lorsque les villes ont besoin de rejoindre leurs populations en
temps réel, par exemple pour émettre un avis concernant l'eau potable, les
diverses opérations de déneigement, des modifications ayant un impact sur la
sécurité routière, les mesures d'urgence à réaliser en cas de menace à la santé
ou à la sécurité publique.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14912 A
titre d'exemple, faute de station de radio locale, la ville de Vaudreuil‑Dorion
a été contrainte, au cours de l'été 2006, d'utiliser des haut‑parleurs
sur une voiture qui a circulé dans les rues de la ville pour informer les
citoyens d'un problème d'aqueduc.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14913 Pour
les petits, moyens commerçants et gens d'affaires locaux, cette nouvelle
station FM représentera un véhicule publicitaire efficace afin de rejoindre
leur clientèle, et ce à des coûts accessibles et raisonnables.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14914 Enfin,
sur le plan culturel nous comprenons que la nouvelle station projetée s'engage
à produire des émissions locales qui viendraient soutenir et encourager les
efforts des nombreux artistes et organismes culturels en leur offrant
gracieusement du temps d'antenne.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14915 Nous
notons aussi que les organismes communautaires de loisirs et de sports de la
région pourront bénéficier du support promotionnel de CJVD‑FM.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14916 Alors
que Saint‑Jean‑sur‑Richelieu, Saint‑Hyacinthe, Saint‑Jérôme
et d'autres villes situées à proximité de Montréal, comme par exemple Saint‑Constant,
Longueuil, Châteauguay, possèdent leurs stations de radio locales, nous nous
demandons pourquoi Vaudreuil‑Dorion et ses villes sours ne pourraient
être desservies par une station radiophonique.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14917 Rappelons
que d'autres localités au Québec, beaucoup moins populeuses comme Acton Vale,
Lac Mégantic, Asbestos, Windsor, Plessisville, peuvent compter sur une station
locale. Pourquoi en serait‑il
autrement pour Vaudreuil‑Dorion et ses villes sours?
LISTNUM
1 \l 14918 La
fréquence 106,3 FM demandée pour Vaudreuil‑Dorion est aussi convoitée par
quatre autres requérantes qui désirent ouvrir une station de radio spécialisée
à Montréal.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14919 Nous
rappelons au Conseil que le marché de Montréal est très bien desservi par tout
près de 40 stations de radio offrant une diversité de programmation sans égale.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14920 Nous
sommes en complet désaccord avec la prétention de ces quatre requérantes qui
affirment que la fréquence 106,3 FM doit à tout prix être attribuée à Montréal.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14921 Notre
région est importante et les résidents de Vaudreuil‑Dorion et ses villes
voisines ne sont pas des Montréalais, mais des citoyens à part entière faisant
tous partie d'un territoire distinct et différent. Ils ont le droit de posséder leur station de
radio.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14922 Alors
que plusieurs excellentes fréquences AM sont disponibles à Montréal et offrent
un bien meilleur rayonnement, pourquoi les requérantes proposent‑elles
l'utilisation de la fréquence 106,3 à Montréal, sachant qu'elle est très
limitée par contraintes techniques et qu'elle offre un rayonnement très
restreint comparativement aux autres stations FM de Montréal?
LISTNUM
1 \l 14923 Pourtant,
le CRTC a octroyé récemment à Montréal des permis AM pour des radios
spécialisées qui donnent pleine satisfaction à leurs titulaires. Il s'agit de CJWI‑AM, CJRS‑AM,
CHOU‑AM et CJLO‑AM.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14924 Par
contre, l'utilisation du 106,3 FM à Vaudreuil‑Dorion lui va comme un gant
et couvre très bien le territoire.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14925 Dans
les présentes audiences pour l'attribution de la fréquence 106,3 FM, le CRTC a
deux options.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14926 La
première, octroyer la fréquence 106,3 FM à Montréal, ce qui aura pour effet
d'ajouter une fréquence de plus à Montréal, oui, une goutte d'eau dans l'océan
radiophonique de la métropole, ce qui n'ajoutera pas à la diversité, mais qui
privera Vaudreuil‑Dorion et les villes environnantes d'une radio à
laquelle ils ont droit, c'est ce que nous estimons.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14927 La
deuxième option, corriger une iniquité, combler un vide immense en attribuant
la fréquence 106,3 FM à Vaudreuil‑Dorion, la seule pouvant convenir à ce
territoire, et ainsi permettre à une région orpheline desservie par aucune
station radiophonique de pouvoir enfin compter sur un premier service de radio
locale.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14928 Nous
soumettons donc respectueusement au Conseil que pour nous c'est définitivement
l'heure de la dernière chance pour les populations de notre territoire de
posséder enfin notre station de radio.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14929 Merci
de votre attention. Je serai à votre
disposition pour répondre à vos questions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14930 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Merci, monsieur Gabriele.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14931 LA
SECRÉTAIRE: Maintenant, s'il vous plaît,
j'inviterais le CLD Vaudreuil‑Soulanges.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14932 Identifiez‑vous
et vous avez dix minutes. Merci.
INTERVENTION
LISTNUM
1 \l 14933 M.
BOYER: Bonjour.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14934 Monsieur
le Président, mesdames, messieurs les Commissaires, membres du personnel du
Conseil, bonjour.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14935 Mon
nom est Luc Boyer. Je représente le CLD
de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges et nous sommes ici aujourd'hui en appui à la
demande déposée par monsieur Sauvé pour une nouvelle station de radio FM à
Vaudreuil‑Dorion, CJVD‑FM.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14936 Le
CLD a pour mandat d'encourager l'ensemble du développement régional de
Vaudreuil‑Soulanges, aussi bien le développement industriel, agricole et
social.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14937 Sur
le plan économique, le rôle du CLD consiste à favoriser le développement,
l'expansion et la pérennité des entreprises du territoire. Vaudreuil‑Dorion et ses villes sours
font partie d'une région orpheline du point de vue de la radio.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14938 Précisons
que Vaudreuil‑Dorion, la capitale de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges,
Valleyfield ainsi que Montréal sont trois territoires complètement distincts
sur tous les points de vue, que ce soit au niveau industriel et commercial que
du point de vue démographique.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14939 Nous
entrevoyons enfin la possibilité d'avoir, dans notre région, la station
radiophonique locale qui manque à la population.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14940 L'Arrivée
de CJVD‑FM répondra à un réel besoin puisque nous ne disposons d'aucune
station radio pour parler de nous et pour informer la population de ce qui se
déroule au quotidien dans notre région, mes collègues l'ont déjà mentionné, à
part les deux hebdomadaires régionaux, ni les stations de Montréal, ni la
station de Valleyfield ne s'intéresse à ce qui se passe dans la région de
Vaudreuil‑Dorion et de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14941 Notre
région connaît présentement un essor formidable sur le plan économique au point
que le journal * Les Affaires + ‑‑ cela a été
mentionné par le maire adjoint de la Ville ‑‑ a qualifié
Vaudreuil‑Soulanges d'eldorado québécois.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14942 Cette
prospérité économique, elle est en partie due à l'arrivée massive de nouveaux
résidents, à titre d'exemple les municipalités de Vaudreuil‑Dorion, de
l'Ile‑Perrot, de Saint‑Lazare et de Notre‑Dame‑de‑l'Ile‑Perrot
représentent 65 pour cent de la croissance de la MRC et la région a connu une
migration si importante que les prévisions démographiques de l'Institut de la
statistique du Québec prévues pour 2011 ont été dépassées en 2006.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14943 Donc,
de 2001 à 2006, la population a augmenté de 17,9 pour cent, c'est une des plus
fortes croissances au Québec.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14944 A
ce titre, au cours des dernières années, le nombre de mise en chantier pour le
développement résidentiel est passé de 278 en 1996 à plus de 1 400 en 2004
et donc ce nouveau média électronique va permettre à la région de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges
de continuer son développement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14945 D'un
point de vue économique, à chaque semaine des entreprises frappent à la porte
du CLD et montrent de l'intérêt pour investir dans la région.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14946 La
MRC de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges compte 26 parcs industriels dont 17 sont
situés sur le territoire immédiat de Vaudreuil‑Dorion et ses villes
voisines où l'on dénombre plusieurs centres commerciaux et près de 2 000
commerces et places d'affaires.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14947 Le
taux de chômage sur notre territoire est parmi les plus bas au Québec, soit
quatre virgule pour cent en 2001, alors qu'il atteignait huit pour cent dans
l'ensemble du territoire québécois.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14948 Il
est important de souligner que le nouveau FM va créer plusieurs emplois
durables et que cette station radiophonique locale va bénéficier d'un fort
potentiel en termes de revenus publicitaires.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14949 La
demande d'un nouveau FM à Vaudreuil‑Dorion correspond aux besoins réels
de la région en matière d'information.
On peut penser aux bulletins de nouvelles locales et régionales, aux
émissions d'affaires publiques locales traitant des enjeux de la région, sans
oublier les nouvelles sportives qui touchent le sport amateur de la jeunesse de
Vaudreuil.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14950 D'un
point de vue culturel, Vaudreuil‑Dorion et ses villes sours comptent des
artistes dans tous les champs d'activités.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14951 Présentement,
le milieu culturel de notre région ne dispose d'aucun média électronique
quotidien pour en faire la promotion.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14952 La
nouvelle station FM projetée va venir soutenir et encourager les efforts des
artistes et organismes culturels.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14953 A
ce sujet, la nouvelle station CJVD‑FM va s'engager à offrir gracieusement
à ces organismes du temps d'antenne.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14954 Quant
aux marchands, commerçants et gens d'affaires de la région, ils vont pouvoir
compter sur une autre alternative pour pouvoir rejoindre leurs clientèles, la
radio en l'occurrence, pour annoncer leurs commerces, produits et services, et
ce à des coûts correspondant à leurs budgets.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14955 La
rareté des fréquences FM encore disponibles oblige le CRTC à analyser avec
grande précaution les demandes, particulièrement pour la fréquence 106,3 FM.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14956 Cinq
requérantes demandent le 106,3 FM dont quatre concernent des radios
spécialisées pour Montréal et une seule pour Vaudreuil‑Dorion afin de
dispenser un premier service local.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14957 Chacune
des requérantes qui demande la fréquence 106,3 FM pour Montréal ne semble pas
réaliser que l'utilisation de la fréquence est désavantageuse pour elle sur
plusieurs plans.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14958 Elle
est limitée par contraintes techniques et offre un rayonnement très restreint
par rapport aux autres stations FM de Montréal.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14959 Pour
ces stations, il serait plus avantageux et dans l'intérêt de leur auditoire
qu'elles choisissent d'opérer sur la bande AM et ainsi permettre à
l'utilisation de la station de Vaudreuil‑Dorion d'utiliser la bande FM
106,3.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14960 Considérant
que le 106,3 est la seule fréquence disponible pouvant convenir afin d'offrir
un premier service local à Vaudreuil‑Dorion, considérant que cette région
n'est pas desservie par une station radio, il est dans l'intérêt du public que
le CRTC, dans un souci de justice et d'équité, accorde la fréquence 106,3 à
Vaudreuil‑Dorion.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14961 Nous
nous joignons à la Chambre de Commerce de Vaudreuil‑Dorion, à la Ville de
Vaudreuil‑Dorion, aux villes sours, aux résidents, à l'Association des
gens d'affaires de l'île‑Perrot, à l'Association des gens d'affaires de
Saint‑Lazare, à la MRC, au Conseil culturel, à la Corporation de
développement communautaire et à la Commission scolaire des Trois‑Lacs
ainsi qu'aux artistes de la région pour réclamer une station FM dans la région
de Vaudreuil‑Dorion.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14962 Je
vous remercie de votre attention et je suis à votre disposition pour des
questions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14963 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Merci, monsieur Boyer.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14964 LA
SECRÉTAIRE: Merci.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14965 Maintenant,
nous entendrons le Conseil culturel de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14966 S'il
vous plaît vous identifier et vous avez dix minutes pour votre présentation.
INTERVENTION
LISTNUM
1 \l 14967 M.
PAYANT: Merci bien, Madame la
Secrétaire.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14968 Je
me nomme Robert Payant, président du Conseil culturel de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14969 Monsieur
le Président, mesdames, messieurs les Commissaires, membres du personnel du
Conseil, je suis président du Conseil culturel de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges,
aussi artiste et créateur.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14970 Je
réside à Vaudreuil‑Dorion depuis 40 ans.
A mon arrivée, c'était une population de 2 500 habitants et
maintenant ça a décuplé.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14971 C'est
aujourd'hui avec beaucoup d'enthousiasme que le Conseil culturel de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges
intervient dans cette audience en appui à la demande d'un nouveau FM à
Vaudreuil‑Dorion.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14972 Le
Conseil culturel est un organisme à but non lucratif qui ouvre depuis plus de
six ans dans le secteur de la culture.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14973 Si
nous sommes ici aujourd'hui, c'est parce que nous prenons très au sérieux la
demande de monsieur Yves Sauvé.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14974 Comme
tous ceux qui font partie du milieu culturel et artistique de notre région
comme les résidents, comme les villes et tous les organismes sociaux, la
Chambre de Commerce, la communauté des affaires, le milieu sportif, le CLD, la
MRC et unanimement, je me répète par rapport à mes collègues, mais unanimement
ont manifesté leur appui dans leurs nombreuses lettres envoyées au CRTC.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14975 Nous
sommes conscients que c'est l'heure maintenant d'en arriver, pour notre région,
à obtenir au moins un service équivalent à nos régions voisines.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14976 Notre
participation à ces audiences a pour but de faire prendre conscience au CRTC de
la nécessité de doter enfin la région de Vaudreuil‑Dorion et ses villes
sours d'une station de radio.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14977 Notre
intervention aujourd'hui se veut un véritable cri du cour. Le monde culturel de notre région que je
représente ne peut absolument pas compter sur aucune station, ni de Montréal,
ni de Valleyfield.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14978 Chez
nous, l'offre culturelle est importante et variée. Laissez‑moi le temps de vous parler des
artistes de chez nous.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14979 Il
y a des artistes amateurs, créateurs, artisans, comédiens, chanteurs, danseurs,
ainsi que des travailleurs culturels, ils se chiffrent au‑delà de 400.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14980 Notre
région ne compte pas moins d'une soixantaine d'organismes et d'entreprises culturelles
offrant une grande diversité de disciplines.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14981 L'ensemble
de ces organismes forme des associations, développe et participe à des projets
de toutes sortes et contribue sans cesse par leur dynamisme à enrichir l'offre
culturelle régionale.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14982 En
ce qui a trait à l'écriture, par exemple, à la diffusion d'ouvres littéraires
régionales et aux artisans pratiquant de nombreux métiers, il y a là des
secteurs qui suscitent un engouement renouvelé.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14983 La
création en l'an 2000 du Conseil culturel de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges a permis
aux artistes et au milieu culturel de notre région de se mobiliser, de
s'organiser en partenariat avec les élus afin de promouvoir le développement
des arts et de la culture dans la région.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14984 Soulignons
la mise sur pied par le Conseil culturel d'un répertoire culturel régional.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14985 Seule
ombre au tableau, nous déplorons le fait que notre région, pourtant en pleine
croissance comme le mentionnaient mes prédécesseurs, quitte à me répéter ou à
répéter des choses, ne peut pas compter sur une station de radio.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14986 Les
stations de radio déjà mentionnées, comme celles de Montréal et Valleyfield,
ont leur propres spécificités et se limitent à desservir leurs marchés et c'est
correct.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14987 Aucune
station, par contre, ne s'intéresse ou ne couvre présentement les nombreux
événements culturels et artistiques présentés dans notre région, par exemple
les festivals, les spectacles, lancements de disques, lancements de livres,
concerts, récitals, vernissages.
Non. Aucune station de radio ne
parle des événements qui ont lieu chez nous.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14988 Dans
sa lettre d'appui au projet d'un nouveau FM à Vaudreuil‑Dorion, la
Société de la sauvegarde de la mémoire de Félix Leclerc à Vaudreuil‑Dorion ‑‑
parce que Félix Leclerc y a habité plus de 20 ans ‑‑ déclarait
le 2 mars dernier : * Depuis nos débuts, nous sommes
malheureusement en mesure ‑‑ et cela est partagé par les
autres associations à but non lucratif et organismes communautaires du
territoire de Vaudreuil‑Dorion ‑‑ de constater que les
stations de radio de Montréal et d'ailleurs font la sourde oreille à toutes nos
demandes pour la couverture d'événements se déroulant dans notre région.
0940
LISTNUM
1 \l 14989 Nous
sommes persuadés que la nouvelle station de radio projetée jouera un rôle
important de développement du milieu culturel puisqu'elle contribuera à
impliquer et augmenter la participation des artistes, des jeunes, des artisans,
des créateurs, les organismes professionnels de la culture d'ici dans les
divers projets régionaux.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14990 CJVD‑FM
Vaudreuil‑Dorion contribuera à accroître la diffusion et la promotion des
activités et des événements culturels.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14991 Sans
le concours d'une radio locale, il demeure très difficile pour un organisme
comme le nôtre de remplir adéquatement sa mission.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14992 Nous
notons les efforts significatifs et très importants consentis par la requérante
dans sa demande.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14993 Au
chapitre du développement du contenu canadien, elle s'engage à verser des
montants largement supérieurs à la contribution exigée par le Conseil.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14994 CJVD‑FM
s'engage à verser 67 000 dollars en coûts directs et 133 000 dollars
en coûts indirects pour la durée de la licence.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14995 L'implication
financière de CJVD‑FM pour l'encouragement des talents canadiens est
remarquable à plusieurs égards. Elle se
traduit par différentes initiatives à la fois variées et originales :
versements de cachets en argent à des artistes se produisant en spectacle;
attributions de bourses à des artistes de la relève; des montants d'argent
consacrés à des organismes, à des événements culturels et artistiques.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14996 CJVD‑FM
Vaudreuil‑Dorion contribuera à l'émergence de nouveaux talents en étant
partenaire de Montjoie en chanson et du Festival de folklore québécois de
Vaudreuil‑Dorion, deux concours annuels destinés à la relève.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14997 Aussi,
c'est avec enthousiasme que le Conseil culturel de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges a
accepté de participer à l'émission hebdomadaire * Arts et culture + sur les ondes de CJVD‑FM.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14998 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Monsieur Payant, j'ai regardé
le reste de votre mémoire.
Essentiellement, ce qu'il dit c'est ce que les deux précédents
intervenants nous ont dit, c'est que les stations de Montréal, de Valleyfield,
il y a des stations à Saint‑Jean, donc si vous me permettez on va passer
à la phase d'interrogation, à moins que vous ayez une conclusion plus
spécifique.
LISTNUM
1 \l 14999 M.
PAYANT: Je pourrais tout simplement lire
la fin, les quelques lignes qui restaient à la fin pour conclure.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15000 LE
PRÉSIDENT: D'accord. Parfait.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15001 M.
PAYANT: Maintenant, pour conclure, à
titre de résident et de citoyen qui demeure à Vaudreuil‑Dorion depuis
plus de 40 ans, qui désire savoir ce qui se passe dans sa région pour
promouvoir, faire une vitrine pour nos artistes et créateur; être informé au
quotidien, ce qui n'existe pas, nous voulons, mesdames, messieurs les membres
du Conseil du CRTC, une station pour nous afin qu'on ne soit pas mis à l'écart
comme le sont souvent les régions, même à proximité de Montréal.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15002 Je
pense, en terminant, à Saint‑Rémy, une petite municipalité de 2 000
habitants, 3 000 habitants et ils ont leur radio communautaire. Nous, il me semble qu'on voudrait au moins ça
aussi.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15003 Merci
beaucoup.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15004 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Merci, monsieur Payant.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15005 Je
vais adresser mes questions à vous quatre et vous pourrez y répondre, au moins
deux d'entre... Enfin, même monsieur
Payant y a fait allusion puisque directement il nous a dit que quand il est
arrivé là il y a 40 ans il y avait 2 500 habitants à Vaudreuil‑Dorion,
aujourd'hui ça a décuplé.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15006 On
voit, effectivement, que toute la région est en croissance significative, les
données de Statistiques Canada et de Statistiques Québec, comme vous l'avez
d'ailleurs dit, se réalisent plus rapidement qu'anticipé.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15007 Cette
nouvelle croissance de population, elle est essentiellement francophone ou elle
est de d'autres groupes ethniques québécois?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15008 M.
GABRIELE: C'est partagé. Il y a beaucoup de francophones, je dirais
que Vaudreuil‑Dorion est à 75 pour cent francophone.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15009 Effectivement,
disons que depuis quelques années, ce qu'on dit, il y a un débordement du West
Island chez nous. Alors effectivement,
depuis quelques années il y a...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15010 D'ailleurs,
c'est pour ça que dans notre revue, notre journal de la ville, * Le Trait d'Union +, on a décidé de le mettre bilingue
maintenant parce qu'il y a une certaine demande.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15011 Mais
c'est à forte majorité francophone.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15012 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Ces nouveaux arrivants là
sont toujours dans une proportion de 25 pour cent anglophones et 75 pour cent
francophones?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15013 M.
GABRIELE: Environ.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15014 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Non, bien il n'y a pas de
données.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15015 M.
GABRIELE: Statistiques. C'est sûr qu'il y en a plus qu'avant.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15016 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15017 M.
GABRIELE: Effectivement. Parce que comme j'ai dit, il y a un
débordement du West Island, c'est ce qui fait qu'il y a une demande et c'est ce
qui fait qu'on a pris la décision, par exemple, l'an passé, comme j'ai dit, de
mettre * Le Trait d'Union + bilingue.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15018 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Monsieur Sauvé dans sa
présentation lundi et vous‑mêmes aujourd'hui nous dites que la communauté
est prête à appuyer une station locale.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15019 Est‑ce
que les commerçants sont prêts à appuyer une station locale?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15020 Je
pose la question en ce sens que dans la couronne de Montréal il y avait des
stations de radio à Laval, à Saint‑Bruno, à Longueuil, elles ont toutes
migré à Montréal parce qu'ils n'avaient pas le soutien financier des
commerçants de leurs régions, donc elles se sont toutes déplacés un jour vers
Montréal.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15021 M.
GABRIELE: Je pense que monsieur...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15022 Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15023 M.
BOYER: Monsieur le Président, à cette
question il y a quelques années je vous aurais répondu non.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15024 Aujourd'hui
je vais vous répondre oui pour deux raisons.
La première, c'est que l'ensemble des commerçants, les associations de
gens d'affaires, la Chambre de Commerce de Vaudreuil‑Dorion sont en train
de prendre conscience que tous ensemble il y a beaucoup de travail à faire, il
y a beaucoup de possibilités de collaboration.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15025 Récemment,
c'est‑à‑dire il y a quelques mois suite à un travail d'un an à peu
près, il y a une association de l'ensemble des associations de gens d'affaires
qui s'est mise en place, donc ça montre la volonté de synergie de tous les
commerçants locaux de la région de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges d'une part.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15026 D'autre
part, la croissance économique accélérée est aussi attachée à une croissance
commerciale accélérée et une problématique nouvelle pour les commerçants locaux
qu'ils n'avaient pas il y a quelques années qui est l'arrivée des gros power
centres Wal‑Mart, Best Buy, donc ils commencent à prendre conscience que
de rester tout seul dans son coin, ça risque de leur poser un souci et que la
publicité et le service à la clientèle et avoir un peu plus pignon sur rue,
c'est une problématique qu'ils doivent maintenant considérer.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15027 Donc,
je pense que oui, il y a le potentiel à ce niveau‑là.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15028 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Parce qu'il est connu que ces
grandes boîtes, les Wal‑Mart, les Best Buy, ne sont pas des acheteurs de
publicité radio.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15029 M.
BOYER: Effectivement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15030 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Ce sont donc les petits
commerçants qui ont à se défendre contre eux qui y voient le potentiel.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15031 M.
BOYER: Tout à fait.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15032 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Force est pour nous de
concéder parce qu'on a les données financières, mais les stations que vous avez
mentionnées comme Valleyfield, Saint‑Jean et Saint‑Hyacinthe ne
sont pas rentables.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15033 Elles
ne sont peut‑être pas non plus dans la misère extrême, mais, je veux
dire, ce sont des situations fragiles, ça demeure des petits marchés.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15034 Donc,
monsieur Sauvé, qui est un entrepreneur individuel, qui n'est pas à l'intérieur
d'un groupe, que les stations de Saint‑Jean et de Saint‑Hyacinthe
aujourd'hui appartiennent toutes les deux à Astral, mais celle de Saint‑Jean
jusqu'à l'année dernière appartenait au groupe Corus, donc évidemment ces
groupes‑là avaient la capacité de les maintenir, mais monsieur Sauvé est
un particulier, alors c'est important qu'il puisse sentir que... et que ça nous
assure aussi de savoir qu'à votre avis et les gens qui restent dans la région
qui sont des éléments de développement économique, social et culturel dans la
région, soyez en mesure de nous donner des assurances qu'il y a un potentiel.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15035 M.
GABRIELE: Si je peux intervenir, les
autres régions n'ont pas l'essor que nous avons. Justement, c'est pour ça qu'on trouve que
c'est important d'avoir cette station de radio, justement pour le faire‑valoir,
je pense que c'est important.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15036 On
est en pleine effervescence, alors je pense qu'il y a vraiment un besoin de ce
côté‑là.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15037 M.
BOYER: Si je peux me permettre, Monsieur
le Président, de compléter.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15038 Je
pense que du point de vue purement commercial, la station de radio de Vaudreuil
va également bénéficier d'une partie des commerces du West Island puisqu'une
grande partie de la population de Vaudreuil habite Vaudreuil, va travailler
dans le West Island.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15039 Donc
ces gens‑là, même s'ils habitent à Vaudreuil, sont, la journée, une
clientèle potentielle pour ces commerces‑là.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15040 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Parce que, effectivement,
c'est une donnée d'ailleurs qui a été préconisée par monsieur Sauvé dans le
cadre de l'audience, c'est qu'il y a du naphtage significatif entre Vaudreuil
et Montréal, évidemment il faisait la démonstration qu'il y avait très peu de
naphtage entre Vaudreuil et Valleyfield mais qu'il y en avait de manière
extrêmement significative vers Montréal.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15041 A
votre connaissance, est‑ce que c'est un naphtage qui va vers le centre‑ville
de Montréal ou c'est essentiellement un naphtage dans le West Island?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15042 M.
BOYER: A ma connaissance, il y a une
partie qui va effectivement au centre‑ville, la grande plupart ne passe
pas Saint‑Laurent.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15043 LE
PRÉSIDENT: A Saint‑Laurent.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15044 M.
BOYER: Ça va aller au West Island et ça
va aller jusque, maximum boulevard Côte‑Vertu.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15045 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Là où ils vont travailler
chez Bombardier ou chez Hywatt.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15046 M.
BOYER: Exactement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15047 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Ou, évidemment, dans les
laboratoires scientifiques le long de...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15048 M.
GABRIELE: Le long de la Transcanadienne.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15049 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Le long de la
Transcanadienne.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15050 M.
BOYER: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15051 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Je la connais bien, la
géographie, je la fais...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15052 M.
GABRIELE: Vous êtes dans la région, je
crois.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15053 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Je reste maintenant à
Gatineau, mais je suis Montréalais d'origine, donc la 40, je la connais, la
voiture la connaît par cour.
‑‑‑ Rires /
Laughters
LISTNUM
1 \l 15054 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Mon collègue, monsieur
French, est dans une même situation.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15055 Monsieur
Noël, je note que vous demeurez à Saint‑Basile.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15056 N.
NOEL: Effectivement, oui, j'habite Saint‑Basile‑le‑Grand
depuis 1976.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15057 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Depuis 1976.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15058 N.
NOEL: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15059 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Vous intervenez au soutien de
la demande de monsieur Sauvé.
Évidemment, vous dites que vous connaissez monsieur Sauvé de vos années
à CKVL.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15060 N.
NOEL: Oui. Je l'ai connu à CKVL, oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15061 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Quelle affiliation avez‑vous
avec Vaudreuil‑Dorion ou si votre affiliation est plutôt avec monsieur
Sauvé?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15062 N.
NOEL: Actuellement, moi je ne fais
partie d'aucun groupe comme tel qui sont sur la liste des requérants ou des
requérantes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15063 J'interviens
ici comme professionnel de l'information et moi c'est l'information qui
m'intéresse avant tout.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15064 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Dans le projet de monsieur
Sauvé, vous avez trouvé qu'il avait les éléments qui...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15065 N.
NOEL: J'ai trouvé des éléments très
positifs. D'autant plus que le CRTC
s'intéresse à la question de la concentration, je pense que ce serait une bonne
décision de la part du CRTC d'accorder ce permis‑là à quelqu'un comme
monsieur Sauvé, parce qu'il y a quand même des réparations à faire après ces
années de concentration de la presse parlée et de la presse écrite, et caetera,
donc, ce serait une très bonne décision de votre part d'accorder ce permis‑là.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15066 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Cependant, l'expérience du
Conseil, et je prends le cas des stations de Saint‑Hyacinthe et de Saint‑Jean
pour mentionner que c'est là, elles appartenaient à des particuliers,
aujourd'hui elles appartiennent à des grands groupes parce que ces particuliers‑là,
un jour, soit insatisfaits de leurs investissements parce que la situation
était trop difficile, soit qu'ils ont atteint un âge respectable et ils ont
cédé leurs intérêts dans des grands groupes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15067 Ce
qui arrive, effectivement, la consolidation, c'est un phénomène, d'ailleurs,
qui nous préoccupe, on l'a noté, on va tenir, d'ailleurs, des audiences à
l'automne sur la diversité des voies parce que, effectivement, on constate
cette consolidation‑là, mais elle s'est faite, cette consolidation‑là,
un jour parce qu'il y a eu des vendeurs.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15068 Il
y avait des acheteurs, et il y a eu aussi des vendeurs.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15069 N.
NOEL: En réponse brièvement à ce que
vous venez de mentionner, je connais assez bien la rive‑sud de Montréal,
dont Saint‑Jean, Saint‑Hyacinthe, et à mon humble avis, ces deux
secteurs‑là ne profitent pas, disons, d'un boom économique comme celui
qui existe actuellement à Vaudreuil‑Dorion.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15070 Je
suis allé à Vaudreuil‑Dorion à quelques reprises et même visuellement il
y a toute une différence là. Sur le plan
commercial.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15071 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Monsieur Payant, vous avez
parlé des programmes que monsieur Sauvé propose d'assistance aux activités
culturelles de la région, vous avez notamment mentionné * Montjoie en chanson +, * Festival de folklore québécois
de Vaudreuil +.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15072 Vous‑même
qui êtes à la tête du Conseil culturel de Vaudreuil‑Soulanges, est‑ce
que vous avez eu des indications de l'intérêt, je peux penser à l'intérêt
théorique parce que recevoir de l'aide financière d'un promoteur, c'est
toujours intéressant, mais est‑ce que vous avez connaissance de
discussions spécifiques que monsieur Sauvé aurait eues avec les responsables de
ces divers programmes qui seront susceptibles de bénéficier de son aide?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15073 Voire
vous‑même.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15074 M.
PAYANT: Disons que les deux organismes,
le Festival de folklore et Montjoie en chanson, ce sont des organismes tous les
deux à but non lucratif et ils ont grandement besoin de la part de diffusion
pour aller rejoindre les jeunes de la relève.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15075 Je
ne sais pas quelles conversations monsieur Sauvé a eues avec ces gens‑là,
mais c'est fondé comme besoin, par exemple, ça je peux vous dire ça au niveau
culturel.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15076 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Au niveau culturel.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15077 Oui?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15078 M.
GABRIELE: Je pourrais rajouter, monsieur
Payant n'en a pas parlé, mais il y a tout ce qui se passe à la Maison Tressler,
par exemple, ça pourrait être diffusé, ça serait un apport fulgurant pour ces
organismes‑là parce que c'est difficile de promouvoir et comme on a dit
dans nos documents, les hebdos locaux, on dirait que ça ne répond pas.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15079 Alors,
la radio, je pense que ce serait merveilleux.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15080 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Ça répond le jour où on le
reçoit.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15081 M.
GABRIELE: Oui, et il faut le lire aussi.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15082 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15083 M.
GABRIELE: Alors que la radio les gens,
le matin, l'écoutent.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15084 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Messieurs, je vous remercie
de votre présence.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15085 Madame
la Secrétaire, passons au groupe suivant.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15086 M.
GABRIELE: Merci beaucoup.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15087 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Bienvenue.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15088 M.
GABRIELE: Merci tout le monde.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15089 LA
SECRÉTAIRE: Merci.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15090 Je
demanderais maintenant aux deux prochains intervenants de s'avancer à la table
de présentation, madame Catherine Novac et Communications Six Doigts.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 15091 LA
SECRÉTAIRE: Madame Novac n'est pas ici,
sauf que nous avons sa présentation papier.
Nous allons l'accepter, elle va être versée à son intervention.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15092 Maintenant,
Communications Six Doigts, s'il vous plaît, vous présenter et vous avez dix
minutes pour votre présentation.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15093 Merci.
INTERVENTION
LISTNUM
1 \l 15094 MS
ELMAN: Mr. Chairman, Commissioner Cram,
Commissioner French and the CRTC staff, good morning.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15095 My
name is Kayla Elman, owner of communications and consulting company Six Doigts. The company focus is public relations, media
consulting, buying and event management.
My background in media began in 1990, when I started as promotion
coordinator at CJAD. I then moved on to
launch the new Quebec radio formats Info690 and 940News. In 2002, I started work as promotion director
at CHOM‑FM to help launch the news show.
For the past year, I have been providing consulting services to 105.1
CKDG, home of MikeFM.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15096 When
I first came to the radio station, I was unsure about the format and the
advertising power. I quickly came to the
realization that Montreal is in need of a multicultural radio station such as
CKDG. Advertisers see results and the
community response has completely changed my mind.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15097 I
now believe that the combined Mainstream/Ethnic format of CKDG is a format
neccessary to have in French, to complement the multicultural communities based
in the French language.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15098 I
have worked in so‑called "Mainstream radio" for many years, and
I walked away a few years ago because I missed the grassroots community feeling
that it had when I began my career. I
was feeling that the only reason I was working was to get more advertisers to
spend more money. I didn't feel it was
about the listener any more.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15099 When
I walked into 105.1, I felt that old feeling, "This place is
real". It had that grassroots
community feeling yet, on‑air, its sound was surprisingly polished.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15100 I
immediately discovered that the station is run by people who feel like they are
family. I think that, in some ways, it's
also run by the listeners and the listeners are just an extension of the family
in the office.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15101 I
have been at the station more than once when someone just walks off the street
to suggest an idea, talk about something that happened in their community, or
just say thank you for giving them a voice.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15102 Each
time, Ms Griffiths or someone else took the time to listen and most of the time
the message was conveyed an air. What
everyone else calls "mainstream" on 105.1 MikeFM, I call an extension
to the ethnic programming. Although it
broadcasts an adult contemporary format, it leads people to the rest of the
station.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15103 To
use a food analogy, Mike is a pizza we all know and easily find, but then it
offers up a moussaka. At first we are a
little nervous to taste it, but once we do we love it and we want more.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15104 I
personally would have never found this station if it did not have the Mike
format in the drive spots. This format
is unlike any other station and it is needed in Montréal. Montréal is a multicultural city and it needs
professional radio voice in French to speak to these communities.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15105 As
an industry professional, I feel that the ethnic community is underserved. 105.1 offers, and I believe 106.3 will offer,
quality programming in a professional manner to a variety of different
ethnicities.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15106 Being
in Québec, most immigrants who arrive learn French as their second or third
language. Having a station like 106.3
will offer them the comfort of their own language and their own cultural
identity, while at the same time enhancing their knowledge of French and
Canadian living.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15107 Advertisers
are understanding that reaching their clients in the language they prefer to
speak is a good way to promote their business.
My clients have asked me if there was a French equivalent of CKDG. I believe if there was, they would advertise
on both English and French.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15108 I
believe that the clients buy into 105.1 and will buy into 106.3 for a few
reasons. They are reaching a new
clientele they have been unable to reach elsewhere, and they truly appreciate
supporting and marketing to their own ethnic community.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15109 Two
of my clients have told me that in the past they have steered away from most
purely ethnic media. Once a year they
may buy a holiday greeting or give a token buy to support their own community,
but with 105.1 they buy first and foremost because they like the
professionalism of Mike broadcasting seamlessly with the ethnic programming.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15110 Second,
it works for them.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15111 Third,
they feel good about supporting their community.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15112 The
young entrepreneurs with ethnic sounding names are not fully served in just
English and French. They now have a
third language to reach their clients.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15113 105.1
is not considered a typical ethnic station.
I see it as a mainstream station with an ethnic flair. With the Mike format 105.1 has imported
professionalism from mainstream which further enhances the ethnic
programming. It brings everything up a
notch. The public and the advertisers
see this.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15114 I
discovered 105.1 because of Mike. A
friend had heard the station and mentioned it to me. I tuned in and discovered something so
different that it forced me to visit the office and meet with the person who
created it, Murray Griffiths.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15115 I
will admit I had my reservations at first.
I was used to the cookie‑cutter stations, the ones that are pretty
much exactly the same from city to city.
This was so off the mark of what I had always been taught that radio
should be. It went from adult
contemporary music to talk, to Greek music, to a variety of different
languages. I was not sure it would
work. I asked myself "is this too
eclectic for mainstream commercial radio?"
LISTNUM
1 \l 15116 The
more I learned about the station, the more I believed. Whenever I met someone of Greek, Romanian,
Russian, Armenian, Haitian, et cetera, I mentioned the radio station and pretty
much everyone knew about it and at some point had tuned in.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15117 There
are not many negative comments, except that some of them felt there was not
enough programming or music for their culture.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15118 I
bought advertising for one of my clients.
Still a little sceptical, I only did a four‑week buy. My client called back and asked to book for
another 13 weeks. He saw a good response
from the station and he liked that he was able to identify his new clients, who
were referred by 105.1. The listeners
liked to talk about a radio station they felt was for them.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15119 Another
thing I discovered about the radio station is that non‑ethnics were
tuning in and enjoying it. As an
alternative to CHOM, MIX, Q92, they found Mike, but once there they discovered
the ethnic portion and truly enjoyed the variety musics and sounds.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15120 A
prime example is my father who is of Russian descent. To be honest, he is a proud daddy and tends
to follow me wherever I go, but when I started doing some consulting for 105.1
he tuned in. The first thing he said
was, "What is this crazy station?"
The next day he called again and said, "Did you hear that story
about...? This is an interesting
station."
LISTNUM
1 \l 15121 This
went on for a few weeks. He called every
couple of days to tell me about something that was said on the station or to
ask me where he could find a piece of music he heard. He was hooked.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15122 He
said, "Even though I don't understand everything people are saying since I
don't speak most of the ethnic languages, I am enjoying the diversity of the
music of the station."
LISTNUM
1 \l 15123 I
think the more people who hear this type of format, the more they will love it,
just like my father and now many of my peers and my clients.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15124 Having
106.3 run a French equivalent of 105.1 is necessary to reach a larger
population. As we all know, French is a
majority language in Montréal and the ethnic communities who speak French as
their second language need that voice.
106.3 can give them that voice.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15125 My
experience from the combined mainstream ethnic programming of Mike has been positive. I have every reason to believe that the
proposed World Beat ethnic French station to hopefully be broadcast on 106.3
will be a viable radio station for my clients to buy.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15126 What
gave me confidence working with 105.1 is that Marie Griffiths has set standards
and raise the bar for ethnic programming.
This being the final commercial FM licence, it would be put to best use
with a company that already produces a successful quality commercial product.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15127 Montréal
can only benefit by having a French language professional commercial FM ethnic
radio station. On a selfish note, I
believe that it will serve the underserved communities and develop the larger
ones that my clients want to reach.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15128 Thank
you for giving me the opportunity to speak today.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15129 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Ms Elman.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15130 Commissioner
Cram...?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15131 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15132 Ms
Elman, when you are selling now for Mike, are you finding an opportunity
for ‑‑ I am going to call it cross‑selling for ethnic
advertisers to be able to cross‑sell into the English portion?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15133 MS
ELMAN: I see it actually in both
ways. As you know, national clients are
hard to find for ethnic programming, but we are actually finding some of them
are calling us and they call us because of Mike, but end up buying the ethnic
stations, realizing that is what they need.
The same thing happens in reverse.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15134 So
people buy all across the board. They
don't just specific ‑‑ unless of course it is a client who
only focuses on one community and that's all they want to reach. Then they will only buy in that community.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15135 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: How much of a sales job do you
have to do? Is it tough to sell?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15136 MS
ELMAN: I am just a consultant with the
radio station and I bring some of my clients there and help train the sales
reps that come in.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15137 It
is a tough sell. We are not like MIX 96
or CHOM where sales reps can sit at the desk and just answer the phone and take
calls. Our sales reps are out on the
street a lot. But it seems to be working
and it is successful.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15138 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Are there different sales reps for
different ethnic groups?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15139 MS
ELMAN: At the moment we do have one
sales rep in specific who handles just Greek.
The other sales reps who come and will handle a variety of different
cultures. If they can handle their own
culture, that would be great. So we have
different ethnicities of sales reps.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15140 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15141 Thank
you, Mr. Chair.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15142 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Vice‑Chair French...?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15143 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: Would you say that there is an
untapped potential for advertisers wanting to reach specific ethnic groups in
Montréal?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15144 MS
ELMAN: I say yes. Right now they can go through local
newspapers, but for the most part the newspapers that I see are geared towards
an older audience and the younger generations who are starting to turn in
because of the diversity of the Mike and the different levels of music that we
play. We are probably one of the few
places to go.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15145 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: So there is, in your view, a
growing untapped market. And that
untapped market would represent advertising that is coming newly into the
overall advertising buy or is it mostly going to be drained from the ethnic
press?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15146 MS
ELMAN: I think it comes a little bit
from both. We have a lot of new clients
who are finding us. The basis of a small
radio station like this, the pricing is not abundant so we can find some
clients that can't afford to necessarily buy that $800 a week ad in the
newspaper; that they can come on radio and spend less than that and have more
frequency.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15147 So
yes, I do.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15148 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15149 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Ms Elman.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15150 The
next group, please.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15151 LA
SECRÉTAIRE : Je demanderais maintenant à
Radio Centre‑Ville de presenter leur intervention.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15152 Ils
ne sont pas dans la salle. Je demanderai
donc à Hyman Glustein et Fernand Leclair de se présenter.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 15153 LA
SECRÉTAIRE: Donc, nous continuerons avec
M. André Turcot.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15154 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Nous prendrons une pause de
quinze minutes, de retour à 10 h 20.
‑‑‑ Upon recessing
at 1008 / Suspension à 1008
‑‑‑ Upon resuming
at 1027 / Reprise à 1027
LISTNUM
1 \l 15155 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Madame la Secrétaire.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15156 LA
SECRÉTAIRE : Donc je vais juste verifier
si Radio Centre‑Ville ou Hyman Glustein et Fernand Leclair sont dans la
salle.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15157 Non.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15158 Donc,
j'inviterais M. André Turcot à faire son intervention.
INTERVENTION
LISTNUM
1 \l 15159 M.
TURCOT : Bonjour.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15160 LA
SECRÉTAIRE: Vous avez dix minutes pour
votre presentation. Merci.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15161 M.
TURCOT : Ça sera pas long.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15162 Mon
nom c'est André Turcot. Je suis propriétaire d'un site de diffusion à St‑Constant
et puis, je suis également actionnaire dans C.J.M.S. J'ai eu la surprise
récemment d'apprendre qu' il y a une station de radio qui veut s'installer sur
mon terrain, puis je ne le savais même pas. Mais il y a pas de place pour une
autre station présentement. Ça fait que s'est ce que j'avais à dire. Je penses
que c'est S.S. TV qui veut venir chez nous. Et, présentement aussi, on vit une
autre experience. C'est que le Ministère
du transport est en train d'exproprier le tiers de la propriété. Ça fait qu'il
y a des infrastructures qui vont disparaître également. Ça fait que, c'est ce
que je voulais dire aujourd'hui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15163 LE
PRÉSIDENT: M. Turcot, je vous remercis
de vous avoir déplacé. Nous n'aurons pas de questions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15164 THE
SECRETARY: I would now ask
Mr. Gurinder Singh to come to the presentation table.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15165 MR.
SINGH: Mr. Chairperson ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15166 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Could you wait for just a
second, please? Could you give us two
minutes, please. Thank you.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 15167 THE
SECRETARY: Could you please stand up.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15168 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: Are you both going to testify?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15169 MR.
SINGH: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15170 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: Then both of you stand up.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15171 THE
SECRETARY: Could you just identify
yourself for the record, please, before you swear in?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15172 MR.
SINGH: Myself, my name is Gurinder
Singh. I'm from California. I am one of the last four victims of Radio
Humsafar.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15173 MR.
KALKAT: Hi, sir. My name is Daljit Kalkat. I am from Montréal. I am another victim of the fraud and misdeeds
of Jasvir Singh Sandhu from Radio Humsafar.
AFFIRMED: GURINDER SINGH
AFFIRMED: DALJIT SINGH KALKAT
LISTNUM
1 \l 15174 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Madame la Secrétaire, est ce
qu'on peu juste ...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15175 Your
name is?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15176 MR.
KALKAT: Daljit Singh Kalkat.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15177 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: Mr. Kalkat, thank you. (Off microphone)
LISTNUM
1 \l 15178 MR.
KALKAT: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15179 THE
SECRETARY: You have 10 minutes for your
presentation.
INTERVENTION
LISTNUM
1 \l 15180 MR.
SINGH: Respected Chairperson and
Commissioners and my dear friends, I am feeling privileged and thankful that
you invited me to present myself and prove how I have been defrauded by Radio
Humsafar. And I'm here.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15181 My
name is Gurinder Singh and I am here intervening Radio Humsafar's application
2006‑02145. I am from 8164
Anastasia Way, El Dorado Hills, Sacramento, California 95762.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15182 My
background. I am a real estate
salesperson licensed in California and Nevada for the last five years. I have a Masters degree in geography from
Punjab University and a diploma in business finance from University Berkeley.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15183 In
addition to that, I am General Secretary of the Northern Nevada Sikh
Society. I am also copartner with Rishi
Bhandal who is also a victim of Radio Humsafar.
They defrauded him as well, along with me.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15184 We
are very respected people of the society.
In introduction, this letter is regarding the alleged fraudulent
solicitation of funds by Dar Singh Sandhu, Jasbeet Sandhu and their cousin,
Majit Singh Sandhu of Radio Humsafar of Montréal and San Francisco, California.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15185 Solicitation
of investment funds for Radio Humsafar's expansion of Dar Sandhu, Jasbit
Sandhu, Majit Sandhu, owners of Radio Humsafar, asked for investment of
expansion of their Radio Humsafar. We
didn't know anything about this. All we
knew was that we invest somewhere in that radio station for profit.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15186 After
taking that money, they said instead of opening those radio stations they duped
us, you know. They also told us,
"Oh, we own the AM 1200 in Barrie", but they were just leasing. So we were all misled on that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15187 Right
now on the proceedings are under consideration in California. The police is after them and also there are
possibilities of further government agencies looking into it. If it is a securities fraud how they could
figure it out, but here I am basically here requesting that please consider
that a person who should be issued a licence for the radio station should have
good strong ethics, plus should not have the pattern of behaviour of defrauding
not only other people but also their own community people, those people who
trust the most.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15188 And
they have defrauded me, myself, Gurinder Singh, Rishi Bhandal, and along with
that when a newspaper group ran that news in the newspaper.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15189 Then
I came to know from Mr. Kalkat that he has been defrauded of over $50,000 and
there are five more people in that if you look at that page number 6, and that
is Satvir Pabla, Parmjit Saini, Tara Chand Bhatti.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15190 And
also I have in this record, even if it is a reference record, he has written
his own handwritten agent statement plus the very lousy and unethical contract
that was done by Avtar Singh and Jasvir Singh Sandhu. Both of them, they tried to rip them ‑‑
they already ripped them off for $110,000.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15191 Now
I would like you to go on the page number 3.
That is my explanation to reply of Jasvir Sandhu to the intervention I
did back in December because ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15192 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Singh, I understand
that this is a civil matter that you have with Mr. Sandhu and your group, and
we are not a court to adjudicate on these types of conflicts.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15193 Obviously,
we are interested in your testimony in regard of the behaviour of Mr. Sandhu as
a radio operator and a potential licensee of a broadcast licence to operate in
Canada.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15194 MR.
SINGH: Mm‑hmm.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15195 THE
CHAIRPERSON: We understand that Mr.
Sandhu is currently operating a sub‑carrier in the Montreal carrier and
obviously if you have programming expectations or programming concerns about
what is currently on air on that SCMO of Mr. Sandhu in Montreal, that is
obviously of interest to us.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15196 But
civil matters to be dealt with by the court of justice will have to remain
there until they are either ‑‑ there is a judgment. Obviously, the Commission will be interested
in any judgment whenever this occurs but we will not be able to resolve the
problem that you are raising today regarding civil matters.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15197 So
if you could restrict yourself to matters under the Broadcasting Act and under
the policies and regulations set by the CRTC, we would appreciate very much the
rest of your testimony.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15198 MR.
SINGH: Okay. Thanks for reminding me then and I appreciate
that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15199 I
am here basically to request that please do not issue a licence to a person who
has a pattern of behaviour of defrauding other people. Even though I understand that is a civil
matter but there should be some kind of grounds where it should not be
overlooked. That is my main concern.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15200 And
I have a person right next to me. He is
also been defrauded by Radio Humsafar and I had already mentioned that in
my ‑‑ during my intervention back in December, that those were
the people and that is why I am here.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15201 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Kalkat, do you want to
add anything else?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15202 MR.
KALKAT: Yes, sir.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15203 The
reason is, honourable panel, because I worked with Radio Humsafar for three
years on a volunteer basis. There was a
program, "Air Kahani" that I ran every Sunday and I used to put in
about 7‑8 hours on running the program, just to set it up. And the thing ‑‑ what
happened was that he was running ‑‑ I will give you a little
bit of background.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15204 He
started taking money from me. How he did
it, because he wanted money for his ‑‑ some project, for the
housing project, telling me that in three weeks he will return the money and I
had to take the money from the Sikh temple where I have given the money for
them to invest to take the loans, okay.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15205 And
what happened was that that money was not returned in three weeks and he
defrauded me almost for $7,000. And during
that time when I was working ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15206 THE
CHAIRPERSON: And he used the airwaves to
collect that money or he solicited various listeners to give him that money or
is it you that was ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15207 MR.
KALKAT: Sorry, can you say that again
please?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15208 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Well, did Mr. Sandhu use
the airwaves to ask the listeners to contribute money towards project
development or ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15209 MR.
KALKAT: No.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15210 THE
CHAIRPERSON: No.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15211 MR.
KALKAT: He did ‑‑ for
the radio station he always made some kind of arrangement to collect money and
telling them, you know, I'm getting broke and people should pay the money, and
running some, you know, sponsorship program and telling people somebody has a
debt and collecting their money and that money never went to those proper
people. There was no record of that,
okay.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15212 But
because I was working at the radio station I can give you much more
detail. The money part he took it
away ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15213 THE
CHAIRPERSON: But again, what you are
raising here is not a matter for consideration by the ‑‑
obviously, it is a matter of concern but it is a matter of civil law ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15214 MR.
KALKAT: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15215 THE
CHAIRPERSON: ‑‑ that has to be dealt with by the court of
justice.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15216 MR.
KALKAT: I agree with you, sir, but what
I am trying to say is this man was running the program over there at the radio
station. There was a piracy programming
going on there. There's iMediaTouch
program, okay, and in that program what was happening was that this
gentleman ‑‑ they bought a program, which I found out later
through Mr. Pabla also.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15217 What
was happening was that they bought the program to load one section but the
production from where they run the songs, they took a sample for one month and
every month they will change the numbers, you know, to keep that month as it is
to run that program.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15218 So
they never bought that part of the program to run it. So they ‑‑ it is illegal to
do it and if iMediaTouch finds it, they could be penalized for that. That was one of the things.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15219 The
other thing, what he was saying was that, you know, that he has his own antenna
at the top of, you know, Royal Montreal, and he's paying $20,000 and people
should pay money because he's serving the community.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15220 That
is misleading. That is very much
misleading because people were thinking that, you know, he's paying too much
money but basically he was buying the program from McGill and probably he's not
paying more than $2,000 a month, to my understanding because I also ran a radio
for a few months and, you know, rates are not that much.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15221 So
he was telling the people this and on top of that he was saying, you know,
sponsor my BBC program because I have to pay BBC to take their program from
them and let the listener listen, but all he was doing was from internet
downloading it and relaying it. That was
another thing he was doing which was not ethically correct.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15222 And
again, he was collecting ‑‑ he collected money for Tsunami
victims, he collected money for Kashmir victims, he collected money for people
sometimes that died and they wanted to pay and there was no record of
that. When they were asking for records,
there was no record that was given to the people.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15223 What
he did to me personally is entirely different, for which I am suffering
now. I am going to Douglas Hospital
every week and almost I died. I survived
because I was not able to take the pressure.
And it is not about money, it is about the ethics.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15224 When
he said that he will give back the money in three weeks and the trust you have
to give a person $60,000, all your family earnings to this gentleman so that he
could do something and he defrauds that, he cheats you. And then I started to look into the CRTC
program and tried to find out what is going on.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15225 So
these were the basic things he was doing.
On earthquake victims, there was $150,000 that was collected and he only
showed $50,000. There was $100,000,
there's no record of it, not at all.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15226 And
then I wrote a letter from ICU, India Canada Organization, as the general
secretary, that his records should be checked.
What he did was that he got a letter from the vice‑chairman and
chairman of the association ICU, which they are not there anymore, from 2007.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15227 They
were members of ICU, chairman and vice‑chair, last year but it was on the
internet and what he did was that he drafted the letter by himself and Rom
Kapila and the other gentleman, Rakish Kumar, signed those documents. That ICU letter was made in his office and
this is not ICU's letterhead at all which he produced. It is not ICU's letterhead. As the General Secretary I know that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15228 And
then I also know that at the same place where Rom Kapila and the other person
signed, they told me ‑‑ another person was standing. He says you cannot do that. So then he re‑drafted the letter. He re‑drafted the letter and Rom Kapila
and the other person, who were not chairman ‑‑ the documents
are submitted here ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15229 Me
LAGACÉ: Mr. Chairman, I just want to
confirm with Mr. Singh that this is part of the intervention that you already
filed or ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15230 MR.
SINGH: No. Let me ‑‑ I have a few
questions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15231 Me
LAGACÉ: Did Mr. Kalkat intervene ‑‑
did you intervene in this process?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15232 MR.
KALKAT: I requested an intervention but
when the honourable judge ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15233 MR.
SINGH: He intervened and plus I
intervened on mine as well.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15234 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay. Anyhow, I think I shall thank you very much
both of you at this time.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15235 MR.
SINGH: I have one more question.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15236 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15237 MR.
SINGH: That is that back in October when
there was earthquakes in Kashmir and Pakistan, they said over the radio that we
are collecting $100,000 and $100,000 U.S. will be matched by ‑‑
either Canadian $100,000 or U.S. $100,000 will be matched by the Canadian
government, which never happened.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15238 And
also, whatever the money they collected, they never gave us any whereabouts of
that money, whereas there's a promise over the air that yes, we will give you
all the reports. And I personally from
my American Express credit card paid $100 and my brother paid $400 because we
trusted that these people are doing something for the community which will go
the right place.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15239 But
according to the news published in the newspaper, they mentioned that still yet
they didn't find any kind of whereabouts and then we find out from the U.S.
other agencies and they said because of those lousy laws it's very hard to
track down those people, especially if they are operating from other countries.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15240 So
those were the situations I wanted to mention.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15241 MR.
KALKAT: And I will take just 20 seconds,
sir.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15242 The
thing is this, that if we give a radio station to a person like him, you know,
he will be the monopoly guy there and people like me could be cheated and we
could all end up in Douglas Hospital where I'm right now going every week,
suffering because of this man. My family's
destroyed because of this man.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15243 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you very much, sir.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15244 MR.
KALKAT: Thank you, sir.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15245 MR.
SINGH: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15246 MS
LAGACÉ: I just want to mention, for the
record, that the evidence that forms part of the intervention consists of Mr.
Kalkat and Mr. Singh's testimony today as well as the documents already
filed during the intervention process that was closed before the commencement
of this hearing.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15247 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15248 Mrs.
Secretary.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15249 THE
SECRETARY: I would now ask if they are
in the room: Manjit Singh Bahia, Paul
Kalsi and Rishi Bhandal.
‑‑‑ No response /
Aucune réponse
LISTNUM
1 \l 15250 LA
SECRÉTAIRE : Donc, maintenant, je demanderais à M. Daniel Poulin et
l'Assemblée Parole et Actes de monter en avant.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 15251 LA
SECRÉTAIRE : S'il vous plaît vous présenter, et vous avez 10 minutes. Merci.
INTERVENTION
LISTNUM
1 \l 15252 M.
POULIN : Merci.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15253 Monsieur
le président, commissaires et membres du personnel, je tiens à vous remercier,
premièrement, de la possibilité que vous nous donnez de pouvoir s'exprimer à
propos de l'ouverture d'une...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15254 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Pouvez‑vous, pour le dossier, nous donner votre nom?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15255 M.
POULIN : O.K. Mon nom, c'est Daniel
Poulin.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15256 LE
PRÉSIDENT : D'accord.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15257 M.
POULIN : ...à propos de l'ouverture d'une station de radio francophone à
Montréal de Gospel.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15258 Moi,
j'habite le Québec depuis mon enfance, puis ma langue principale est le
français, et je suis ici pour vous parler d'un besoin pressant pour notre
société francophone, parce qu'il y a une carence au niveau musical pour la
relève Gospel québécoise contemporaine.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15259 Mon
passe‑temps actuel, c'est d'avoir créé et maintenu depuis deux ans et
demi une petite station radio musicale sur internet en français, musicale
Gospel, puis mon but est de faire connaître au monde francophone qu'il y a un
vaste contenu musical varié provenant des gens d'ici, puis dont les paroles des
chansons pourraient avoir un impact positif sur la société.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15260 On
a, depuis le début, ramassé environ 410 compacts provenant d'environ 150 auteurs
différents, qui donnent quand même un potentiel de pouvoir écouter pendant neuf
jours de temps de la musique en français, sans repasser les mêmes chansons.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15261 Puis
je crois qu'on est comme à pointe de iceberg, parce qu'il y a un nombre inconnu
d'artistes francophones qui font de la musique Gospel qui n'ont pas eu encore
la chance de faire entendre leur voix puis surtout leur cour pour annoncer la
valeur de leur foi, puis sans compter qu'il y en a d'autres qui ont le
potentiel de faire des CD puis qu'ils n'ont pas comme la possibilité de pouvoir
injecter des montants d'argent, sachant qu'ils ne seront pas écoutés, parce que
la plupart des stations de radio actuelles ne présentent pas ce genre de
musique là.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15262 Vous
savez comment est‑ce que l'accès internet est quand même assez difficile,
qu'on est pas encore dans tous les foyers.
Puis même quand on a l'internet, la recherche sur internet est
difficile, puis c'est dur d'être connu.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15263 Puis
la plupart des stations de radio actuelles ne présentent pas la musique Gospel
en français. Pourtant, on peut y
retrouver des pièces de qualité.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15264 Moi,
je crois que notre culture est en train de s'effacer parce qu'on est entouré
sur les ondes de toute sorte de musique provenant de la musique américaine,
Gospel aussi inclus, et même des musiques d'autres ethnies, des langues ou
d'autres religions qui sont présentement sur les ondes, et que, présentement,
les gens francophones ne savent même pas qu'il existe cette musique là en
français parce qu'ils ne peuvent pas l'entendre.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15265 Nous
devons, nous les francophones, avoir la chance de présenter nos valeurs puis,
dans un sens, nos capacités de produire de la musique avant qu'on soit
complètement dilué, parce que les francophones, ils n'ont pas de présentation,
ils ne sont pas représentés.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15266 Le
Canada anglais, ils ont compris cela, puis ils ont mis sur pied plusieurs
stations de radio anglaises chrétiennes afin de présenter leurs contenus musicaux.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15267 C'est
pour ça qu'il est important, qu'il est urgent même, d'avoir ici à Montréal une
station de radio qui se chargera de les faire connaître, puis je crois que le
projet de M. André Joly rejoint le plus cette vision. C'est un projet québécois visant à faire
connaître les artistes francophones dans notre communauté.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15268 Monsieur
Joly propose un contenu musical majoritairement en français, puis je crois
qu'il s'y connaît dans ce contenu‑là parce qu'il vient d'un milieu chrétien,
puis que lui‑même est un francophone québécois.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15269 Puis
en plus, d'après son expérience, il est depuis 40 ans dans le métier de la
radio, il s'y connaît, puis il a su s'entourer de gens capables d'opérer cette
station. Il l'a prouvé à plusieurs
reprises en faisant des émissions temporaires, parce qu'on a eu des permis
temporaires à pouvoir faire des fins de semaine ou un mois de temps, puis c'est
ce qu'il a fait.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15270 Puis
en plus, il a un cour de faire connaître la relève Gospel francophone.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15271 Je
crois que le CRTC fera un bon choix en donnant le permis à monsieur Joly.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15272 C'est
ce que j'avais à dire. Merci beaucoup.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15273 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Merci, Monsieur Poulin.
Merci pour votre présentation.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15274 Madame
la secrétaire.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15275 LA
SECRÉTAIRE : Ceci complète la liste d'intervenants comparaissant, donc, la
Phase III.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15276 Avant
de débuter la Phase IV, for the record, Canadian Hellenic Cable Radio Ltd. has
filed their breakdown of time for sports, news, weather and traffic. They have also submitted their commitment to
Canadian content development, including their contribution to Music‑Multi‑Montreal.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15277 La
requérante René Ferron a aussi soumis leur programmation en semaine par
catégorie et sous‑catégorie, une description de leur public cible, ainsi
qu'une description de leur programmation de nouvelles.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15278 Nous
avons aussi reçu un échantillon de programmation musicale proposée par la
requérante Yves Sauvé.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15279 And
the applicant Neeti P. Ray has filed their proposed Montreal station revised
projection.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15280 Ces
documents seront versés au dossier public de leur demande, et une copie est
disponible à la salle d'examen.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15281 Nous
poursuivrons maintenant avec la Phase IV, où les requérantes peuvent répondre à
toutes les interventions soumises en rapport à leur demande.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15282 Les
requérantes comparaissent dans l'ordre inverse.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15283 Nous
demandons, alors, à Communications Média Évangélique de faire leur
présentation.
RÉPLIQUE / REPLY
LISTNUM
1 \l 15284 M.
JOLY : Bonjour, Monsieur le président.
Ça fait plaisir de vous voir aujourd'hui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15285 Alors,
Communications Média Évangélique, bien entendu, voudrait bien obtenir ce
privilège de diffuser cette musique Gospel au Québec. L'industrie, elle est là mais n'a pas la
possibilité de se faire entendre.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15286 On
a besoin, bien entendu, de moyens de communication. La meilleure manière de permettre à la
population de Montréal d'entendre cette musique, c'est par la radio.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15287 On
a réalisé qu'on avait l'appui des gens de Montréal parce que, depuis 2003, on
travaille dans le milieu.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15288 On
veux voir, on voulait savoir, tâter le terrain. On a participé à des événements
comme tels le Festival Gospel de Repentigny, qui malgré le fait qu'il n'y a pas
beacoup de possibilités de se faire entendre au niveau des ondes, parce qu'il
n'y a pas de véhicule radiophonique, il tire plus de 15,000 personnes à chaque
année depuis sept ans. Alors donc, on voit bien l'intérêt.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15289 Même
les diffusions temporaires dont on parlais tantôt, M. Poulin, on a fait
quelques diffusions temporaires sur le site du Festival Gospel, même à tel
point que les gens de Repentigny qui n'ont pas de station de radio, nous
demandaient si on était pour être permanent à Repentigny parce qu'il y avait eu
une tempête, puis, on avais passé en ondes quelques messages pour Repentigny. J'ai dis non, que malheureusement pour
Répentigny c'est Montréal qu'on veut s'installer, et donc, on a vu la
population signer nos petitions, s'embarquer à aller y, on veut cette musique‑lá,
on l'aime ce musique‑lá, ce n'est pas rattaché à une religion en
particulier.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15290 C'est
une journaliste du journal le Droit, d'ailleur, elle a écouté notre internet,
la musique sur l'internet ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15291 LE
PRÉSIDENT : M. Joly?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15292 M.
JOLY : Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15293 LE
PRÉSIDENT : C'est la phase de réplique
aux interventions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15294 M.
JOLY : Bon. Vous voulez que je parles contre? Alors, je
vais.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15295 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Non, mais je voulais dire,
répondre à ceux qui ont fait des commentaires ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15296 M.
JOLY : Alors, je vais aller
positivement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15297 LE
PRÉSIDENT : ‑‑ à l'égard de votre présentation.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15298 M.
Joly: Nous croyons que nous avons la
meilleure proposition parce que le milieu est derrière nous, alors que
International Harvester n'a pas su attirer l'intérêt des gens du milieu.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15299 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Ça, c'est
l'intervention. Lá, on est à la
réplique.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15300 M.
JOLY: A la réplique?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15301 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Donc, à la réplique. Bien,
M. Poulin viens vous appuyer. Merci M.
Poulin.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15302 M.
MATHIEU : C'est ça.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15303 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Parce qu'à ma connaissance,
il n'y a pas d'intervention négative à l'égard de votre projet.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15304 M.
MATHIEU: C'est un fait, Monsieur le
Président, sauf qu'il y a un intervenant, qu'on considère un petit peu en
compétition contre nous, qui propose cette couverture là. Nous, on vous propose
cette couverture là.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15305 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Oui, ça s'était votre
intervention. Vous l'avez faites hier.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15306 M.
MATHIEU: Voilà.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15307 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Merci beaucoup.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15308 M.
JOLY: Merci beaucoup monsieur le
Président.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15309 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Madame la Secrétaire.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15310 THE
SECRETARY: Now we would ask Radio
Humsafar to respond to all the interventions that were filed to their
application.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 15311 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Madame la Sécretaire, je
considère que c'est important que Radio Humsafar apparaisse. Je suis sûr qu'ils
sont dans le voisinage lá.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15312 M.
MATHIEU : Je m'excuse pour ce contretemps, mesdames, messieurs et commissaires,
M. Sandhu s'en vient incessamment.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 15313 THE
CHAIRPERSON: It is my understanding, Mr.
Sandhu, that you want to take the oath.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15314 Madam
Secretary.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15315 THE
SECRETARY: Please stand up. Could you state your name into the microphone
for the record.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15316 MR.
SANDHU: Jasvir Singh Sandhu.
AFFIRMED: JASVIR SINGH SANDHU
LISTNUM
1 \l 15317 THE
SECRETARY: Thank you. You have 10 minutes to make your
presentation.
REPLY / RÉPLIQUE
LISTNUM
1 \l 15318 MR.
SANDHU: Hello. Good afternoon, everyone. My name is Jasvir Singh Sandhu, President of
Radio Humsafar, a Canadian company, and I am the sole owner of the company.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15319 To
my knowledge, there is no entity called Radio Humsafar in the U.S. I, Jasvir Singh Sandhu and Radio Humsafar
have had no dealings whatsoever with these gentlemen. Legal action has been instituted against them
to this effect when I saw some news stories in the newspaper, in a local
newspaper in California.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15320 So
when we start that, our counsel in California, they received a letter from the
editor of the newspaper mentioning "this is a paid advertisement".
LISTNUM
1 \l 15321 We
are proud of our service and programming which, to my knowledge, the Commission
has had no complaints in six years of service on SCMO service in Montréal. We take very seriously the privilege the
Commission will grant us by using the public AM airwaves to conduct our
business. We assure the Commission that
Radio Humsafar is willing to take a pledge to provide outstanding broadcasting
service to the Montréal South Asian communities.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15322 Mike
might want to add something.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15323 MR.
MATHIEU: All right. I will answer the intervention of Mr. Neeti
P. Ray and S.S. TV.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15324 When
they say that we have a low‑budget and we are not doing things properly,
well, you know very well that stations such as ours are on the air at the
moment. Some are being implemented and
their working very well with similar budgets that we are proposing.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15325 So
I think that takes care of that and that will work.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15326 Yesterday
at the question period I think the Commission understands that this is
Montréal. It is not another market like
Toronto. The amount of money, the
revenue projection and the expenses projection and things like this that we
propose are more in line with stations such as ours in this market as opposed
to Toronto.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15327 I
think the other applicants have exaggerated their projection. Again, we feel that their application is more
for a Toronto station that a Montreal station.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15328 Given
all this and given what was said here in the intervention process, I have known
Mr. Sandhu for quite a while.
Before I accepted to be his consultant, I did a few checkings with Radio
McGill, and so on, and I am convinced that if you give him the honour of having
a licence, the privilege of using 1400 kHz, Mr. Sandhu is going to do a good
job. I have no problem with being his
consultant.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15329 As
far as the use of an FM frequency, I think you know what my position is. Radio Humsafar pledges ‑‑
and I know this for a fact to be an ethnic station. There is another applicant here who pretends
to want to have an ethnic station. I
think that person has every right to do this.
However, if you listen to the existing station, whether the rules are
met or not, the impression you get when you listen to the morning show on the
drive is that it is a mainstream station.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15330 This
is the point we would like to make.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15331 Again,
we thank you for listening to us and giving us a chance to appear here today.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15332 MR.
SANDHU: I just want to add, I raised the
question of funds raised and things like that over the air. Whenever we do such a thing, we raise any
funds, our advisory committee is there.
So all the funds, whenever we collect, it goes to the right organization
or wherever it has to go, and we announce on the air and we keep the records.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15333 Thank
you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15334 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Commissioner French...?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15335 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: Mr. Sandhu, you are under oath.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15336 Have
you ever solicited funds over your SCMO for the purposes of maintaining your
service on the air, for paying any bills that accrue to you or Radio Humsafar?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15337 MR.
SANDHU: No, never.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15338 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: You deny then, categorically,
the affirmation of your former employee to the effect that you solicited funds
from your audience on the grounds that you needed financial support to maintain
your service in operation?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15339 MR.
SANDHU: I never announced such a thing
like that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15340 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: So what would you
recommend? What are we to understand,
then, of your former employee's allegations?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15341 These
are all wholesale fabrications, California, Montréal, Calgary? These are all made up out of the air, are
they?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15342 MR.
SANDHU: To my knowledge, because
Montréal we never had any other complaints, so this is the only one. The reason behind it, our news broadcaster,
she is the ex‑wife of Mr. Kalkat.
So he is doing because of her. He
don't want to work at Radio Humsafar, so she want to damage that ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15343 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: (Off microphone)
LISTNUM
1 \l 15344 MR.
SINGH: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15345 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: Fine. So you never used (off microphone)
LISTNUM
1 \l 15346 MR.
SINGH: Yes, sorry.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15347 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: I am not interested in hearing
the domestic problems. You have made a
statement of fact which I take it is not ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15348 MR.
SANDHU: No, that is a reason. You know, I know it is not in your
consideration, but that is the reason and what I think.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15349 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: So you never used the facilities
of your SCMO to solicit funds for the purposes of supporting your station?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15350 MR.
SANDHU: Never.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15351 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: You only use it for the purposes
of raising funds for good causes in India or in Canada associated with your
clientele?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15352 MR.
SANDHU: Yes. Most of the time we give the money to Red
Cross, and Red Cross people they always come to our radio station when we are
doing those kinds of things.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15353 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: In your mind there are no
reasonable grounds for feeling that you have been a bad trustee of these
charitable monies?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15354 MR.
SANDHU: No. Nothing is true.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15355 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: Then help us a little bit. You say there is no Radio Humsafar in
California, yet we have in the files a logo of a Radio Humsafar in California.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15356 How
do we square this circle?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15357 MR.
SANDHU: All right. I want to clear that out.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15358 So
there is an AVR Media Company in California that belongs to my cousin. So we are providing our Canadian CRTC
regulated programming to them. We are
exporting programming to the States, so they are broadcasting our
programming. So that is all I do.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15359 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: It is not called Radio Humsafar,
notwithstanding the fact that calls itself Radio Humsafar?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15360 MR.
SANDHU: It is called AVR Media.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15361 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: You personally deny any
involvement whatsoever in the activities which have led to the grievances that
have been exposed to us in writing and briefly here in person?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15362 MR.
SANDHU: I have nothing to do with those
people.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15363 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: How do you ‑‑
sorry.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15364 How
do you explain their concern with you, then?
Have they arbitrarily selected you from among the relatives of someone
they were doing business with?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15365 Why
are you in the picture at all? Why do
you suddenly become associated with these activities?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15366 MR.
SANDHU: I don't know. Maybe somebody wants to damage our
application or ‑‑ I don't know.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15367 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: But why would they want to do
that?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15368 MR.
SANDHU: I don't know.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15369 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: So fate has arbitrarily selected
you as the individual against which these people appear and fabricate complete
nonsense on the subject of your business practices?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15370 MR.
SANDHU: We can ask them if they have any
proof Radio Humsafar or are just ‑‑ like where is my
involvement? Did I sign anywhere, any
document? Do they have any proof they
paid me the money?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15371 Can
they produce any document?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15372 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: I am not principally concerned,
Mr. Sandhu, with whether or not there is a civil case in California.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15373 MR.
SANDHU: I know.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15374 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: I am concerned with your
personal fitness to hold a broadcasting licence. I am giving you the opportunity here and now
to explain to us what seems like a very, very arbitrary and surprising event,
to wit that people have come all the way from California to make statements
about your fitness to hold a licence, apparently for no good reason that we can
think of except they don't like your cousin in California.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15375 I
mean, that seems a very unlikely story and I'm trying to give you the
opportunity to explain how it could be that they would bother to come all this
way to say things which you say are complete fabrications about you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15376 MR.
SANDHU: Actually, I don't know what is
the reason behind it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15377 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: You have never, I take it, in
the talk show that you operate ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15378 MR.
SANDHU: Right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15379 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: ‑‑ been involved with any issues of religion and
racism or issues associated with your homeland, which has had a difficult
political history, which would be qualified as demagogic or unreasonable in
your mind?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15380 We
have a statement on the record from Manjit Bahia who says:
"Mr. Jasvir Singh Sandhu's talk
shows are also questionable. He plays
with the emotion of the people. Radio
media show should be above religions and racism, but from his regular talk shows
I smell racism and religious fundamentalism.
These things have no place in our country." (As read)
LISTNUM
1 \l 15381 MR.
SANDHU: Does this person live in
Montréal?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15382 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: No. This person apparently lives in Calgary.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15383 MR.
SANDHU: Actually we don't provide
programming to Calgary. But we never had
any complaint like for our talk shows or any other programmings. Our talk shows are very well educated,
informative, stimulated and we have different guests from ‑‑
you know, if we are talking about religion, so we invite the leaders of the
different religious groups or the leaders of different organizations, doctors,
engineers. They come and they provide
information.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15384 People,
like in a call‑in show, so they call and they acquire the information,
whatever they need. So those talk shows
are very informative and we have no problem with that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15385 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: So when you discuss what has
been historically difficult political situations, both in your former country
and as a result of the events in your former country, events in our country,
you are careful to be balanced and judicious in your treatment of those issues?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15386 MR.
SANDHU: I am very careful of that and I
know the CRTC rules and regulations. I
know it is an SCMO service, but we follow like AM/FM radio CRTC
regulations. So I am very well aware of
that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15387 COMMISSIONER
FRENCH: Those are all of my questions,
Mr. Chairman.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15388 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Commissioner Cram...?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15389 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15390 Mr.
Sandhu, I apologize, I have to go back to the boxes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15391 MR.
SANDHU: Sure.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15392 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: I made a mistake yesterday.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15393 In
the boxes when we were talking about the ethnic group to be served by the Tamil
language, I sort of put in your mouth that it was Sri Lanka. The ethnic group is really Tamils for whom
the Tamil language will be programmed.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15394 Would
that be fair?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15395 MR.
SANDHU: Sri Lanka and South India.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15396 MR.
SWAMINADHAN: Yes, yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15397 MR.
SANDHU: The state of Tamil I do in
India. Our marketing breakdown ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15398 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: No, but the ethnic group will be
Tamils?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15399 MR.
SWAMINADHAN: That's right. That's right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15400 MR.
SANDHU: Tamil, yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15401 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15402 Mr.
Sandhu, you said you did most of your fund raising with the Red Cross and I am
assuming that they would be giving out charitable receipts?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15403 MR.
SANDHU: Right. Actually, we collect ‑‑
usually we don't collect money at our station.
Usually we just take the pledges and most of the people, they send
directly, because when we call Red Cross they said if the people, individuals
need the receipts for tax purposes, so they have to get the money directly to
Red Cross. So they do that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15404 A
couple of times we collected the money and they gave us one receipt. So we have all the records, all the fund
raisers.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15405 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right. So you may end up with collecting some money,
but the Red Cross would then give you a collective receipt. Is that the idea?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15406 MR.
SANDHU: That's right. I have a picture from Red Cross giving me the
receipt, you know, like one time when we were doing fund raising.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15407 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right. Is there any fund raising that you do for
which there is no charitable receipt given?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15408 MR.
SANDHU: No. For me, no.
Last time what they were talking about, like Kashmir when there was a
big earthquake, like we were taking the pledges. So we asked the people, "How do you want
to send the money? Do you want us to
give the money to a special organization, Red Cross or whatever you want?"
LISTNUM
1 \l 15409 We
had a talk show on that. So many people,
they express their views. Some of them,
they said, "Okay, we want to give to Red Cross because they will
double ‑‑ they will match the dollars." Some of them, they said, "No, we want to
give to a South Asian organization."
So then I said, "What do I do?"
LISTNUM
1 \l 15410 When
we have talk show, the voting was 50‑50.
So I said, "What do I do?"
Like some people, they said, "Okay, give it to a South Asian
organization." So then the question
is which organization.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15411 So
then the leaders of our community, they came to our radio station and we are
meeting with the advisory board. So then
they decided to pick an organization that is on non‑religious
organization that is in Ontario, Guru Nanak Relief Fund.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15412 So
we give them money. We announce it on
radio, so whoever wants to give to this organization so they can pay us or pay
this organization directly, or who wants to pay to Red Cross.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15413 If
you want a tax receipt, you had to pay directly to the Red Cross.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15414 So
we got almost $50,000. So that we paid
to Guru Nanak Relief Fund. That is a
Toronto non‑profit organization.
So we have receipts and we have all the records for that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15415 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: But is that organization a
charitable organization ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15416 MR.
SANDHU: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15417 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: ‑‑ under the Canada ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15418 MR.
SANDHU: They are supposed to provide all
the receipts to the different people.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15419 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So you essentially just gave an
accounting to them and then they would provide the receipts?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15420 MR.
SANDHU: Right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15421 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: But the Red Cross was just to get
the money directly?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15422 MR.
SANDHU: Right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15423 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: At this moment in time, are there
any outstanding claims, judgments or writs against your company or yourself
personally in Canada or the U.S.?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15424 MR.
SANDHU: Never. Nothing, never.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15425 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Thank you, sir.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15426 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you very much, Mr.
Sandhu, and your team.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15427 MR.
SANDHU: Thank you very much.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15428 THE
CHAIRPERSON: We will go to the next
item.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15429 THE
SECRETARY: I would now ask S.S. TV to
respond to all the interventions that were filed to their application.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 15430 THE
SECRETARY: You have 10 minutes to make
your presentation.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15431 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Please introduce for the
record the people that are with you, Mr. Pannu.
REPLY / RÉPLIQUE
LISTNUM
1 \l 15432 MR.
PANNU: Thank you again, Chairperson,
Commissioners and CRTC staff.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15433 Our
reply is to interventions placed against the application of S.S. TV Inc. Most of the intervenors are well‑connected
as evidenced by their own documentation with Mr. Michel Mathieu.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15434 Mr.
Michel Mathieu is a consultant of Radio Humsafar and their representative. Most of the other intervenors are clients and
associates of Mr. Michel Mathieu.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15435 We
have replied to these interventions in writing.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15436 Now
I request Mr. Mario Kumar to reply to Radio Humsafar's intervention on
technical issues.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15437 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Only for the record, I note
that you are Mr. Sanjiv Kumar.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15438 MR.
KUMAR: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15439 THE
CHAIRPERSON: And obviously
Mr. Pratola.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15440 MR.
PRATOLA: Good afternoon, or good morning
I guess.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15441 Before
I start, I want to just reply to what was said just previously with regards to
costs, as to what it costs in Montréal as compared to what it would cost to
operate a station in Toronto.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15442 My
experience has been that there really isn't any difference. We hire people from Montreal to come down to
Toronto and they overcharge us. People
come here, or come to Montréal and work here, and they overcharge.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15443 It
is a dichotomy of things or something like that. But the point is, from what I could tell from
their spreadsheet is that there is absolutely no way, no way, not for that kind
of money.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15444 But
I digress.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15445 In
front of you, you have a contour map which indicates both the S.S. TV pattern
and the Radio Humsafar pattern superimposed.
By the way, that is supposed to be a perfect circle. So I wasn't drunk, I didn't have anything to
draw with and I was burning ‑‑ well, I didn't have any more
midnight oil left to burn, so I tried the best I could.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15446 But
basically that is it. Okay?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15447 Also,
you have a document there from YRH, which is to answer the comment of yesterday
with regards to the three inline towers at CJMS.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15448 Radio
Humsafar or Michel Mathieu, the consultant for them, categorically denied
that. I'm sure he knows what he is
talking about, but I go by what my engineer is saying. I go by what they are stating on paper, and
they tell me that there is three towers inline.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15449 Therefore,
that is the reply in terms of that concern.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15450 Now
I will get into the rest of the replies required.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15451 A
couple of interventions are placed against application ‑‑
sorry.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15452 Radio
Humsafar claims that all 1 kW AMs are perfect in terms of transmission
coverage. To this he added similar
undertakings in Toronto. I am astounded
at hearing comments of this nature which are baseless and just hearsay. Comments which are not supported in any way
with valid technical studies, nor facts, nor documents should not be possibly
admitted.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15453 At
stake there are very serious issues.
Applicants have spent loads of money to get to this stage and, as applicants,
we are supposed to accept undocumented technical analysis at face value?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15454 No,
sir. You provide the facts.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15455 I
would request of the Commission that any testimony in this regard be struck out
that was made yesterday.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15456 Mr.
Chairman and Commissioners, when an undertaking is completed, due diligence is
often or should be exercised by the broadcaster in order to qualify the pattern
by taking FSM readings or field strength meter readings for two reasons: one, to keep the P. Eng honest; two, to keep
himself honest about the quality of coverage he has, which in turn is tied to
the ad sale campaign.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15457 In
the maps you have in front of you, the two Radio Humsafar's contours were
transposed and scaled. The 25 mV per
metre and a 3.65 mV per metre were transposed onto that Map No. 3. Here are the observations.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15458 Radio
Humsafar, because it is a one antenna radiator, it will provide an
omnidirectional pattern are shown, and of course it does go farther than the
S.S. TV Inc. pattern. There is no
denying. But this is where we diverge
the facts and reality.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15459 First
of all, there is no thing as a perfect omnidirectional perfect circle coverage,
as shown in Radio Humsafar. Their map
does not deal with real‑world facts such as atmospheric attenuation,
obstructions, sky waves, tunnelling effects, et cetera.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15460 What
one has to also be mindful of is the "what if" statement, "what
if" events. I can assure you that
at some point they will be operating at a low power for some necessary
reason. If that was the case, the
pattern would collapse and suffer severely.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15461 Mr.
Chairman and Commissioners, if I may, I have worked with the Canadian
Broadcasting Corporation for many years and amongst other duties I responded to
listener complaints from all over southwestern Ontario, be it FM, AM, TV,
whatever. I therefore speak from the
real world experience, and I assure you that Radio Humsafar will not perform as
it technically appears.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15462 Radio
Humsafar should have asked for a real pattern which takes into account the
conditions which were just mentioned.
The 25 mV and 3.65 mV will experience difficult reception on the North
side of Montréal, communities such as St. Leonard, Anjou, Cité‑de‑la‑Mode,
et cetera. In the downtown core of
Montréal single degradation should be expected.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15463 Radio
Humsafar claims that most of the ethnic community, South Asian, resides in the
West End of Montréal or the Island of Montréal.
Perhaps this is so. Let me just
say that if this was the case, Radio Humsafar should have located itself closer
to the community it wishes to primarily serve, but doing that it would thwart
the lucrative market of the remaining ethnic groups.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15464 S.S.
TV Inc., its pattern is a function of its co‑siting constraints, but it
does work well, our market, primarily Montréal central. S.S. TV Inc. has taken the philosophy, both
in Montréal and in our Brampton application, that we will not nickel and dime
but only real investment and honest approach will do.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15465 Radio
Humsafar is attempting to cover a large metropolitan city with such a low
power, the analogy being like shooting a rhino with a BB gun. This kind of operation just doesn't cut it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15466 Radio
Humsafar again claims that the majority of ethnic groups live in the West End
of the Island of Montréal and, further, they comment that S.S. TV does not
cover that area.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15467 We
at S.S. TV, our music: Do these
individuals work? Do they shop? Do they travel? Who knows?
Of course they do. They do all
these things. After all, they are all
people.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15468 S.S.
TV will catch them as soon as they get mobile, for kilometre upon kilometre
upon kilometre within our half millivolt contour, which is the in‑vehicle
service contour. We will have a possible
audience of 2.8 million listeners. This
is exciting, although it is obviously tailored to a particular group.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15469 S.S.
TV Inc. would also like to assure the Commission that although the theoretical
pattern does not go as far west as we would prefer it, the RF signal does not
die suddenly at some theoretical line on a map, but it continues for some
distance yet. I would not be surprised
if the whole of the West Island is covered due to RF leakage, spillage,
provided ‑‑ the terrain would be a key factor as well in this
coverage.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15470 Radio
Humsafar has also brought up the issue of usage of the 1320 kHz frequency in
its place for the 1410. This has been
answered in the intervention stage, but we will revisit the issue for the last
time simply because it was mentioned again.
1320 kHz ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15471 THE
SECRETARY: I'm sorry, but your time is
almost over. Could you conclude, please?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15472 MR.
PRATOLA: All right. I will pass over to Mr. Pannu.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15473 MR.
PANNU: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15474 We
had a couple of comments which we don't have time to explain more, but the
Commission and Chairperson has our written comments about these
interventions. So we think you will
consider these interventions that were made by others.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15475 We
have answered for Mr. Turcot's in this intervention. So we thank you for giving us the opportunity
to appear in front of this Panel and we wish in the future.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15476 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you,
Mr. Pannu. I will have the first
question.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15477 You
heard this morning Mr. Turcot who brought a new piece of information that
Transport Québec was expropriating the piece of land. Obviously you don't have the configuration of
the piece that they are expropriating, but could that have an impact on your
ability to implement the extra tower?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15478 MR.
PANNU: I would ask Mr. Mario to answer
this.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15479 MR.
PRATOLA: According to Brian Sawyer, who
is one of the best if not one of the remaining few AM specialists we have in
the country, he visited the site and he provided comment and opinion and it was
based ‑‑ YRH based our technical brief on his opinions and I
trust his opinions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15480 We
go back quite a bit with the Mother Corp. and he is very good, so no reason why
we shouldn't be trusting his opinions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15481 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Pratola, in your oral
presentation ‑‑ I think it's in your paragraph 9 ‑‑
referring to your paragraph 9, yesterday Radio Humsafar quoted that most of the
South Asian population in Montréal was living in Lasalle, Lachine, Dollard Des
Ormeaux, Pierrefonds, Roxboro, St. Laurent, Dorval and throughout the West
Island and some parts of Laval.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15482 Obviously
in your rebuttal you alluded to the fact that you will serve them when they are
in a mobile environment, but do you think the Commission should also keep in mind ‑‑
and is it true ‑‑ my question is: When you did your study, Mr. Pannu and
Mr. Kumar, did you identify exactly where the South Asian population is
currently living?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15483 MR.
KUMAR: Well, we don't deny the fact that
the South Asian population do live in the West Island. We accept that the South Asian population do
live in Laval and Lachine. That is not
untrue.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15484 I
was just wondering something back. We
were analyzing in Toronto and the South Asian community was previously
concentrated in downtown Toronto, and after that they moved to
Mississauga. And now they are more,
there are 58 percent approximately in Brampton.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15485 In
this type of situation, if there is a migration of people which normally takes
place, people love to concentrate on particular areas, the Humsafar
application, if that happens, what has happened in Toronto happens in Montréal
in the future, what will be the future of that small, low powered, thousand
watt transmitter?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15486 THE
CHAIRPERSON: I am talking specifically
about your own project.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15487 When
the South Asians navigate in Montréal to go for work, do you know where they go
for work?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15488 MR.
KUMAR: Most of them go to downtown
Toronto. They go to various factories.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15489 THE
CHAIRPERSON: I'm talking Montréal
specifically.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15490 MR.
PANNU: All right. You are where the new development
occurs. Mostly we have experienced in
Toronto when people came from overseas into Canada they were living
downtown. Then they got a little bit of
money and they bought the house where the house was really inexpensive and keep
doing their jobs and having more money and getting some source from overseas to
get the money here. So then they start
buying that bigger house in new places.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15491 So
what we see here, what will happen in the future depends on which area will be
good for them.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15492 Our
understanding is all the immigrants keep moving from one place to another
place.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15493 MR.
KUMAR: Another factor I can mention is
that people, they have started developing things in the area of Brossard where
Humsafar's application intervention says that hardly 500 people of South Asian
community lives. But people have started
moving to that direction.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15494 MR.
PRATOLA: May I just had something to
that from a technical point of view.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15495 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15496 MR.
PRATOLA: When we looked at, first of
all, the frequency and, second of all, the location, we were sort of under
pressure because it was a September 18th hearing ‑‑ anyway, it
was postponed because of that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15497 But
the fact is that if we were to be licensed and it didn't work out with whom we
think we should be co‑siting with, we would go and we would find a parcel
of land. We would construct an entire
AM, which is probably unheard of today in this manner. And yes, then we would be where we actually
want to be.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15498 But
this is the reality of things. We want
to maximize the spectrum. 10 kW is an
excellent way to start.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15499 So
we have a future basically.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15500 MR.
KUMAR: Another point I would like to add
in final is that our application, it is not only for the South Asian community. It has to cover various other
communities. The Commission has to make
a decision so they have to see that other communities are to be served by this
AM station also, not only the South Asian community.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15501 MR.
PANNU: We try to bring many communities
on one platform so we can utilize to the maximum AM frequency, not to small
community or not to small spectrum.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15502 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Pannu, you heard your
consultant Mr. Pratola saying that if you cannot collocate you will find
another frequency, another piece of land, and you will implement a superb AM
radio station, which is unheard of in today's terms.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15503 MR.
PRATOLA: May I just correct you, sir?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15504 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15505 MR.
PRATOLA: Not look for a new frequency.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15506 THE
CHAIRPERSON: No, for the same
frequency. I apologize for the
misunderstanding.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15507 But
obviously that will require money. It is
good for your consultant to say so, but we would like to hear it from the one
who is cutting the cheque.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15508 MR.
PANNU: Yes, sir. We have no objection. If you allow us today, you are granting a
licence, we can bring the parcel to you within a week or two. So we don't have any problem.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15509 We
are well financially operational since a long time and we don't have any
objection to buy the property.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15510 I
should mention here, too, we were expecting a Brampton licence so due to that
we purchased the property which was really close to Brampton community.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15511 What
we think in the previous application our programming was not properly
understood by the Commission. So we
don't have any objection to buy the land, buy the equipment at the right time.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15512 MR.
KUMAR: I can add here to Mr. Pannu
the paragraph 16 of our submission here, we have already mentioned here that we
accept this as a condition of licence, if we are to develop a new site. We have already mentioned that in the
paragraph 16.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15513 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Yes, but again, that was
read by your consultant.
‑‑‑ Laughter /
Rires
LISTNUM
1 \l 15514 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you very much,
gentlemen.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15515 MR.
PRATOLA: I just want to add one other
thing. I just want to say that I am
trying to work for a new truck.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15516 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Fine. Thank you very much, gentlemen.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15517 MR.
PANNU: Thank you, sir.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15518 MR.
KUMAR: Thank you again for giving us the
opportunity.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15519 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you very much.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15520 THE
SECRETARY: I would now ask International
Harvesters for Christ Evangelistic Association to come to the presentation
table.
REPLY / RÉPLIQUE
LISTNUM
1 \l 15521 REVEREND
LUTES: Mr. Chairman, Commissioner
French, Commissioner Cram and others of the CRTC, I am pleased to appear before
you to respond to the interventions that have been submitted against us.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15522 We
wish to respond to the intervention that this would not be the best use of the
frequency.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15523 Our
high commitment to local programming demonstrates that our application is the
best use of the frequency. Given that
many ethnic groups are defined in large part by their religious heritage, we
will serve the varied ethnic communities of Montréal.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15524 For
some, their religion is largely synonymous with their culture. A full hour each day is devoted to specific
ethnic religious broadcasts.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15525 We
have been wrongly cast by one of the applicants as being single faith. Our documentation shows this is a multi‑religious,
a multi‑ethnic station being proposed.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15526 We
have been accused of not being accommodating.
This could not be further from the truth. We are offering to train members of various
ethnic religious groups to produce their own programs. We have a solid strategy to develop new local
programming whereby we give training and provide equipment for groups to
represent themselves on the airways, and if this is not enough we will even do
it for them.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15527 It
has been suggested that we apply for an AM frequency. With our strong emphasis on the current
Christian music and wanting to appeal to a younger demographic, our business
plan requires the fidelity of an FM frequency.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15528 It
has been said that the numbers do not merit a religious FM licence. 214,000 Montréal Protestants is bigger than
most Canadian cities. Focus on the
Family, Time Canada, and the Vanier Institute have each conducted polls all
showing the same results: religion is on
the rise in Canada. Church attendance is
on the rise for the first time in a generation.
Weekly religious service attendance now stands at 25 percent.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15529 There
is an emerging religious renaissance.
Religion is making a comeback.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15530 Some
of the intervenors have tried to suggest we do not have the numbers to warrant
such a station. Reginald Bibby of the
University of Lethbridge, the country's leading expert on religious trends,
says religion is growing in Canada.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15531 One
intervenor said Radioville is excellent.
I find this surprising. They are
not playing the top 40 Christian songs from the charts. I fail to see how they are even remotely
coming close to serving the needs of other religions. They are one‑sided, being
Catholic. We are the ecumenical solution
and the inter‑religious answer.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15532 Underserved
third language groups can be served through our religious licence. We would be willing, for example, to have a
portion of the Hindu program in an East Indian language. In fact, we would except as a condition of
licence that would make room for other languages in our broadcast schedule.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15533 We
are the best concession that will make the most people happy because we can
serve the religious and ethnic communities at the same time.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15534 When
people immigrate to Canada, they want to find a spiritual home to meet new
people. 106.3 in Montréal, with a 3 mV
coverage, serves 1.5 million people; 106.3 in Vaudreuil‑Dorion will
serve 70,000. If the frequency is used
in Vaudreuil‑Dorion, then it can't be used in Montréal where 20 times the
people would be served.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15535 We
understand the needs of Montréal, much to the chagrin of those who would state
otherwise. This has been abundantly
evidenced by our demographic and market studies. We are well aware of the cries of Montréalers
for security, comfort, hope and peace.
We are able to give people what they are asking for.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15536 It
is our accusers who do not understand the Montréal market and the vision of the
CRTC. Canada is not a Christian
country. Technically there is no such
thing as a Christian radio licence. We
reflect the country's religious mosaic by allotting time to all the major
religions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15537 Further
to the allegation the numbers do not warrant such a licence, adult weekly
religious attendance is at 18 percent in Québec. This constitutes a large number who want a
religious FM licence. Religion is alive
and well.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15538 The
numbers currently warrant a new religious FM licence to serve such a large
percentage of Montréal. We represent the
widest and largest group of all the applicants.
We will have the greatest potential listenership. 30 percent of Canadians reported to
researchers that religion was very important to them.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15539 There
is a renaissance of religion in Québec.
Religion is alive and well in Québec.
Christian beliefs are holding ground in Canada. Awarding this licence will accommodate and
satisfy the largest group attending the needs of religious and ethnic
communities at the same time.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15540 Thank
you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15541 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you very much. Thank you Mr. Lutes and Mr. Adams.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15542 Madam
Secretary...?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15543 THE
SECRETARY: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15544 I
will now ask Neeti P. Ray to respond to all the interventions that were filed
to their application.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 15545 THE
SECRETARY: Please introduce yourself and
you have 10 minutes. Thank you.
REPLY / RÉPLIQUE
LISTNUM
1 \l 15546 MR.
RAY: Thank you. My name is Neeti P. Ray. Good morning once again, Mr. Chairman and
Commissioner Cram and Commissioner French.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15547 I
will respond and I will keep it as brief as possible. I know it is almost at the end of the last
phase.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15548 The
contention of Canadian Hellenic Cable Radio that our proposal does not provide
for enough programming in French and English, we would like to point out that
such so‑called bridging initiative would be achieved better by first
giving the third language communities what is dearest to them, in terms of
radio service that is, programs in their own heritage languages that they are
most comfortable with.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15549 There
is an abundance of French and English language programming in various genres
that each community is exposed to in Montréal.
Duplicating any service in the mainstream languages at the cost of
services to third language communities who are devoid of programming in their
heritage languages would be counterproductive in the efforts to achieve the
true objectives of the Ethnic Broadcasting Policy and the Broadcasting Act.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15550 It
is therefore our position that using the valuable 106.3 FM frequency to provide
first‑time service to 20 unserved and badly underserved ethnic
communities in their mother tongues in the Montréal market should be a top
priority during this licensing process.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15551 Considering
the demographics of Montréal and the services available in the market, as well
as services that are unavailable in the market, our proposal strives to do
exactly that, serving as many unserved ethnic groups as practicable without
compromising on the quality of service to these 20 ethnic groups.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15552 Additionally,
because we shall generate our revenues from business communities that for the
most part remain untapped, our proposal will have the least impact, if any, on
existing Montréal radio stations, unlike the Hellenic proposal.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15553 Radio
Humsafar. As for Radio Humsafar's
contention that the 106.3 FM frequency does not have as good a coverage as the
1400 AM frequency proposed by Humsafar, we would note that the population
figures within Humsafar's 15 mV contour is 320,000 people and within its 5 mV
contour 705,000 people. In comparison,
the population figures within our comparable 3 mV and .5 mV FM contours are 1.4
million and 2.25 million people, respectively, as can be seen in our
application, section 5.2.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15554 René
Ferron and Yves Sauvé have both argued that it would be more appropriate for
our ethnic service to move to AM frequency.
While we leave it to the Commission's wisdom to decide whether the
ethnic service that we are proposing is better suited for FM or not, we would
point out that the diverse communities that we propose to serve do not only
deserve a good quality signal, but they also are spread across the greater
Montréal area, that we believe only the 106.3 FM frequency can best reach.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15555 I
think I neglected to mention that Hellenic also raised the issue of being a
local Montréaler as being important to be an owner of a radio station in
Montréal. We do not see that as an
issue, otherwise CHIN Radio would not have been licensed for Ottawa; they live
in Toronto. NewCap, who I know Rob lives
in Halifax, would never have been given a new licence for Ottawa or for Alberta
or for British Columbia. And I don't see
that anywhere in the regulations as being an issue.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15556 I
think what is an issue is the licensee should be capable of successfully
establishing a radio station that would be in line with the regulation and
fulfil its obligations to the communities and to the CRTC and to fulfilling the
conditions of licence.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15557 We
are more than capable of doing that and also knowing that the synergies that I
know are flowing from CHIN Radio to Ottawa are unquestionable. And I have complimented Lenny Lombardi on
that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15558 So
that sort of answers that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15559 Dr.
Agard, you have anything to add to that?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15560 DR.
AGARD: Commissioners, I believe that
yesterday Hellenic referred to this application as a traditional ethnic
broadcasting application. My sense is
that that is probably what is necessary at this time. What is necessary is a tried and trusted
model of bringing that diversity to Montréal, that representative
diversity. This is the last frequency
FM. And my sense is that experimenting
at this time with another model when you have the South Asian community being
the only community that is grossly underserved with a full operational
broadcasting undertaking, then the traditional model is perhaps what is
necessary.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15561 So
I think we should leave you with that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15562 The
last comment was that one or two intervenors also mentioned about the broad
span of service should include French.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15563 I
know that is a sensitive issue, but I believe, Commissioners, you do have an
opportunity to do that as well, not at the expense of the underserved.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15564 MR.
RAY: While we recognize that each
applicant has worked very hard and has come here with very strong convictions
about their proposals, and we have indeed learned a lot from each one of them
and we do want to thank them for that, but I also wish to thank you very much,
Mr. Chairman, and Commissioner Cram and Commissioner French, for so patiently
hearing us out, and also the staff for so quietly bearing with us. All the best to everybody.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15565 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. Ray, Thank
you, Dr. Agard. We have no questions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15566 Thank
you very much.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15567 THE
SECRETARY: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15568 Maintenant
je demanderais à René Ferron de venir à la table.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 15569 LA
SECRÉTAIRE: S'il vous plais vous
présenter et vous avez dix minutes pour répondre aux interventions, merci.
REPLY / RÉPLIQUE
LISTNUM
1 \l 15570 M.
FERRON : Alors, bonjour Messieurs,
Mesdames les Conseillers.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15571 Alors,
je demanderais à monsieur Barnabé, notre future vice‑président, de vous
entretenir.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15572 M.
BARNABÉ : Bonjour. Certains on dis que
notre projet était un voeu pieu. On a dit aussi que c'était un beau projet, une
belle idée. Nous, on affirme que c'est le seule projet qui a été présenté ici
qui est vraiment différent de ce qui existe dans l'industrie. C'est une
proposition originale qui va dans le sens de l'avenir plutôt que dans le sens
de repli sur soi.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15573 Oui?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15574 Je
pensais que vous aviez ‑‑ non, non? OK, très bien. Non, non.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15575 Donc,
notre proposition est vraiment originale parce que, ce qu'on propose, c'est
très différent de ce qui existe et ça va dans le sens de l'ouverture de
l'avenir et non du repli sur soi.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15576 On
a parlé de l'équipe. Alors, nous
disposons des ressources humaines nécessaire pour faire ce travail là, d'abord
l'équipe de direction est une équipe expérimentée qui a fait ses preuves.
L'équipe de production, si on veut, est multiculturelle et
multidisciplinaire. Nous avons, par
exemple, deux conseillers en musique du monde, un qui est critique à la presse
dans ce domaine là depuis ‑‑ au journal La presse depuis 1999
et un autre qui est chef disquaire dans un commerce au détail, donc en contacte
avec le publique et capable, donc, de répondre aux demandes de ce publique‑là. Donc, ces deux personnes là sont ‑‑
font parties de l'équipe et on a aussi, comme vous l'avez vu dans les
documents, des conseillers ou des ressources un peu dans toutes les domaines.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15577 Nos
ressources financières aussi sont solides, on en a parlé quelques fois, les
ressources techniques aussi.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15578 Pour
ce qui est... on a dit aussi que notre proposition manquait de précisions, par
exemple, en termes de programmation.
Nous avons déposé, ce matin, un tableau détaillé qui répond à toutes ces
questions‑là.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15579 La
programmation a été regroupée par catégorie.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15580 Alors,
dans le domaine des créations orales, Catégorie 1, nous avons environ 31 pour
cent de notre programmation, dont 3 pour cent plus ou moins de nouvelles, et 28
pour cent pour les autres créations orales.
C'est détaillé même par programme.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15581 La
musique populaire, Catégorie 2, représente 18 pour cent de la programmation
générale, ou encore, si on veut, 28 pour cent de la programmation musicale.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15582 La
Catégorie 3, c'est 44 pour cent de la programmation générale ou 70 pour cent de
la programmation musicale.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15583 Le
reste, c'est pour les productions musicales comme les thèmes, et caetera, et
puis la publicité.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15584 Maintenant,
pour ce qui est de la programmation préenregistrée, 54 pour cent des créations
orales seront préenregistrées...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15585 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Monsieur Barnabé, vous nous avez déposé ce document.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15586 M.
BARNABÉ : Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15587 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Il fait partie du dossier.
Ce n'est pas nécessaire de nous en faire le sommaire ou quoi que ce
soit. Le personnel, les membres du
Conseil vont l'étudier avant de prendre leur décision, soyez‑en assuré.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15588 J'aimerais
qu'on revienne plus spécifiquement sur l'aspect réplique aux interventions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15589 CONSEILLER
FRENCH : On ne veut pas que vous utilisez le temps de réplique pour les choses
qui sont faites de toute façon.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15590 M.
BARNABÉ : Très bien. O.K.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15591 Pour
ce qui est des ressources, du côté des nouvelles, nous allons faire appel à des
collaborateurs ici pour la rédaction des nouvelles, mais la question souvent a
été soulevée du contrôle de l'information, de la qualité de l'information.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15592 Alors,
nous sommes en mesure... nous avons ce qu'il faut pour offrir un encadrement
professionnel qui va permettre le respect des règles de déontologie les plus
strictes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15593 Nous
avons aussi comme ressources pour les nouvelles ‑‑ on a fait
allusion à ça, mais je vais le préciser parce que la question a été soulevée
aussi ‑‑ non seulement il y aura chez nous des nouvelles
internationales, nationales et locales les plus pertinentes, des nouvelles
culturelles pertinentes aussi, mais nous sommes déjà en contact avec des radios
francophones ou des radios qui diffusent en français à l'étranger, qui pourront
nous permettre d'avoir accès, qui nous donnerons accès à des éléments qu'on
pourra reprendre dans les bulletins d'information.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15594 Comme,
par exemple, on a déjà des contacts avec la Radio nationale jordanienne, qui
diffuse en français, qui a un service en français, la Voix du Vietnam, Radio
Pulsar au Burkina‑Faso, et Radio Métropole en Haïti, juste à titre
d'exemple.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15595 Pour
ce qui est de la programmation, certains ont dit c'est une programmation
légère.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15596 Bien
nous, on pense qu'une programmation, bien sûr, qui est d'abord axé sur la
musique du monde, doit consacrer du temps à la musique du monde, mais le reste
de notre programmation est surtout culturelle.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15597 Je
trouve qu'il y a une sorte de mépris de parler de légèreté quand on parle de
culture. La culture, ce n'est pas léger,
ça dépend comment on en parle. Ça dépend
comment on traite la culture, et c'est un lieu de rencontre beaucoup plus riche
en potentiel de rapprochement que des thématiques qui soulèvent plus de
polémique et plus de conflit.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15598 Alors,
la question de la culture et de la programmation légère, je pense que c'est une
chose qui ne va pas se confirmer dans la réalité.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15599 Maintenant,
certains ont proposé des programmations, d'après ce qu'on a vu, qui nous
semblent morcelées, alors que la nôtre, elle est autour d'une idée maîtresse
très, très claire, c'est une programmation intégrée et non pas l'accumulation
d'une série de programmes faite par des équipes qui viennent d'un peu partout.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15600 Nous,
on a vraiment une vision intégrée : c'est la présentation en français de
musique du monde à un auditoire qui vient de toutes les souches, de toutes les
origines, et, en ce sens‑là, on ouvre les portes et on favorise le
rapprochement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15601 Pour
ce qui est du marché, notre clientèle, on l'a dit quelques fois, c'est une
clientèle urbaine, trilingue souvent, jeune, qui s'intéresse, bien sûr, à sa
culture d'origine, mais qui adhère à une sorte d'identité urbaine qui est
ouverte sur le monde, et ce marché‑là, il est à développer.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15602 Dans
notre esprit, il est très clair, et on pense qu'autour de ça, il y a des
possibilités d'aller chercher une audience et de développer une radio qui aura
du succès et qui sera rentable.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15603 Maintenant,
René va intervenir maintenant sur des points relatifs à la fusion.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15604 M.
FERRON : Monsieur French, hier, je crois que vous étiez inquiété comment on
pouvait, avec $ 9 000 produire des CD. Alors...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15605 CONSEILLER
FRENCH : On a le document, Monsieur Ferron.
Si vous voulez en parler, parfait, mais nous allons recevoir le
document, et puis c'est tout à fait légitime comme réponse. Bien que, normalement, on ne le ferait pas,
dans ce cas‑ci, aucun problème, on apprécie la clarification.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15606 M.
FERRON : Parce qu'on a communiqué avec le président des plus gros studios, et
voilà!
LISTNUM
1 \l 15607 Me
LAGACÉ : Je m'excuse de vous interrompre, je voudrais simplement que le dossier
le mentionne.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15608 Alors,
tout simplement, juste faire une description du document pour être certain que
ça soit consigné au dossier. Juste me
dire en quoi consiste le document, s'il vous plaît.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15609 M.
FERRON : Bien, voilà! Le document
consiste en une lettre du président de Studio Z, qui dit qu'il peut faire...
cette compagnie‑là peut faire le mastering des pièces provenant du CD du
20K et produire une copie maîtresse, qui, par la suite, serait utilisée pour
les fins de reproduction.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15610 Ils
seraient prêts, si, évidemment, on va plus loin dans notre projet, à nous
présenter une échelle de tarifs moindre que les tarifs normalement demandés
dans l'industrie.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15611 Ce
matin, nous avons apprécié beaucoup l'intervention de AVR, et ce que nous
voulons vous dire, c'est que nous sommes prêts à collaborer très étroitement
avec eux et à défrayer une partie des frais encourus par cette collaboration,
cette coexistence, et que nous avons les moyens pour payer ce que nous devrons
payer pour bien cohabiter avec eux.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15612 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Monsieur Ferron, nous n'avons pas d'autres questions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15613 Monsieur
Ferron, Mademoiselle Ferron, Monsieur Barnabé, merci beaucoup pour votre
participation à cette audience.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15614 Madame
la secrétaire.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15615 M.
FERRON : Et nous vous remercions de nous avoir permis de vous expliquer notre
projet en direct.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15616 LA
SECRÉTAIRE : Merci.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15617 J'inviterais
maintenant Hellenic canadien câble radio de se présenter.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 15618 LA
SECRÉTAIRE : S'il vous plaît vous présenter, et vous avez 10 minutes pour
répondre aux interventions soumises en rapport à votre demande. Merci.
REPLY / RÉPLIQUE
LISTNUM
1 \l 15619 MS
GRIFFITHS: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15620 I
am accompanied today by Allan Mass, Lisa Joseph, Ronald Laborde, Bill Schwartz
and Joel Fortune.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15621 We
have made a strong case for the licensing of CHCR to offer an ethnic service
including a World Music and French language component on 106.3 in Montreal.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15622 Our
service has two major strengths. First,
it will be accessible to a broad audience reflecting multicultural diversity in
the French language, as represented by a deep World Music experience.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15623 Our
application will not be exclusively third‑language programming targeted
at specific communities, and we have been criticized on this basis but we put
forward our pluralistic, inclusive approach and programming in French as a
fundamental strength. This approach
reflects our knowledge of Montreal and its communities.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15624 Our
second major strength is that we have focused on providing a comprehensive
level of service to two significantly underrepresented groups in Montreal
today, the Hispanic communities and the Haitian community in Creole, and a
consistent level of service to the other groups we will serve.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15625 It
has been said that the Hispanic and Haitian communities are already well
represented on Montreal radio but this is not the case at all. Combined these two groups represented a
population of 160,000 people in 2001.
Services in Montreal that are measured only in number of hours do not
come close to a full level of service for these growing communities.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15626 We
offer professional third‑language programming which will complement
existing programs. We will provide a
seamless commercial service with professional production values. It is a mainstream ethnic radio. We develop broadcast professionals. We offer employment in radio. Our service is simply different than what is
out there and it meets a different need.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15627 We
chose these two groups because we learned with CKDG FM that there was a large
unmet demand for more programming hours.
We could not keep up with this demand, so it is natural that these
groups should find the needed new outlet.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15628 This
represents the natural growth and development of these language markets. There is a need, especially acute, in the
Haitian community and among Haitian youth.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15629 Je
demanderais à Ronald Laborde d'en parler un peu.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15630 Ronald.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15631 M.
LABORDE : Merci, Marie.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15632 Bonjour.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15633 La
communauté haïtienne est l'une des communautés immigrantes les plus anciennes
au Québec. Elle est également une des
communautés faisant face à beaucoup de problèmes : problèmes d'éducation,
délinquance juvénile, prostitution, taux de chômage élevé, gangstérisme, et
caetera.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15634 Lorsque
vous écoutez les options qui existent pour la communauté, aucune d'elles
traitent de façon professionnelle et efficace ces problèmes. Il y a plusieurs raisons majeures à cette
lacune.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15635 Les
animateurs qui parlent de ces problèmes s'improvisent dans ce domaine. Aucun effort n'est fait pour rencontrer les
personnes concernées, les intervenants sociaux, et les professionnels qui
pourraient suggérer des pièces de solution pour régler ces problèmes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15636 On
ne retrouve pas de jeunes qui animent des émissions traitant de ces problèmes,
qui, d'après moi, comprennent mieux que quiconque ces phénomènes. Plusieurs des médias communautaires ont la
même programmation avec les mêmes animateurs depuis 10 ans ou plus.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15637 Malgré
que CJWI, ou bien le 1610 AM, qui n'a pas d'émission qui traite de façon
spécifique et structurée ces problèmes, mais lorsqu'ils le font, la langue
parlée est seulement et toujours en français.
C'est accommodant pour les jeunes, mais qu'en est‑il pour les
parents ou les grands‑parents, qui doivent bien comprendre ces phénomènes
pour encadrer leurs jeunes et qui ne parlent que le créole?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15638 Je
pourrais continuer à vous donner plusieurs raisons pourquoi, malgré la présence
de quelques radios communautaires, il existe un vide réel d'émissions valables
dans la communauté haïtienne à Montréal, mais je m'arrête ici, tout simplement
pour vous dire : Donnez‑nous la possibilité d'aider la communauté
haïtienne.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15639 Merci.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15640 MME
GRIFFITHS : Merci, Ronald.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15641 We
are not focused alone on these two major groups. 106.3 will also offer a service to others
that are still unserved or underserved, including the Arabic‑speaking
communities, Vietnamese, South‑Asian, Armenian, Romanian, and the French‑speaking
African community in Montreal.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15642 Our
strategy is to provide significant blocks of programs to provide the best
service we can ‑‑ to fewer groups, yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15643 We
constantly hear from advertisers that they want to buy spots throughout the
week in certain targeted program segments.
We are building on this strength.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15644 Let
us also not forget the additional groups to be added on our existing service,
CKDG FM, which the intervenors largely overlooked. 106.3 will open up CKDG FM to grow new
language groups and to offer more hours to others, including the Filipino
community, drastically nonexistent on Montreal media; the Croatians; the Serbs;
the Iranians; Azerbaijanis; and Russian communities.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15645 In
addition, importantly, CKDG will offer more programming to Montreal's English‑speaking
Black community, which would include Indo‑Caribbean communities and
native Montrealers with roots stretching back generations, of course. This community is significantly underserved.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15646 Lisa
Joseph has direct experience with programming to this community.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15647 Lisa,
please.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15648 MS
JOSEPH: Thank you, Marie.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15649 Thank
you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15650 I
am co‑founder and CEO of RASE TV Productions (Reggae and Soca
Entertainment Television). I produce and
host the show "In the Zone" on CKDG 105.1 FM and I produce for
television as well.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15651 It
is not true, as has been suggested, that the Black community is already well
represented on radio. Our longest
Caribbean program in Montreal is a party promotion program literally and the
program is not professional, to say the least.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15652 There
have been many formal and informal complaints to the station manager and the
CRTC about this particular program. Yet,
this is supposed to be a flagship program for the Black community in Montreal
in English.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15653 Looking
at other programs, there are about 10 hours of other programs for the Black
English‑speaking community. This
is mostly not professional quality.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15654 There
are no programs on the air in Montreal representing the Indo‑Caribbean
population besides "In the Zone" on CKDG.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15655 There
are no other programs on the air for Black baby‑boomers besides "In
the Zone" on CKDG, no programs that truly reflect Canadian talent such as
the "Canadian Reggae Star Competition" which airs on "In the
Zone" television and radio programs.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15656 There
are no other radio personalities in Montreal who have made broadcasting their
full‑time job.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15657 By
2017, the largest visible minority in Montreal will be the Black
population. We must prepare now for the
future.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15658 Right
now there is only 1.5 hours on commercial radio representing all Black age
groups and origins. Simply put, we need
more programming.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15659 MME
GRIFFITHS : Merci, fille.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15660 We
have responded in writing to the interventions we received, so my final
comments are brief.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15661 One,
we offer a segment of South‑Asian programming. We see, though, that there are viable
alternatives using the AM frequency to meet the specific needs of the South‑Asian
community in a comprehensive way in a more traditional ethnic format. Our approach would work well with such a
service.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15662 Two,
CHCR is financially healthy and ready to launch a new service. We intervened against a Montreal applicant
over two years ago when we were starting up in a CRTC proceeding and some
intervenors have pointed to this.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15663 A
great deal of progress has been made since we started up. We also have an investor and shareholder who
is committed to our success. We contribute
to the Canadian broadcast system with innovating programming. We now come to you with a good format on
CKDG, with Canadian original productions and ad revenue that is growing.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15664 Finally,
CKDG has shown market share growth over six consecutive BBM books. The last book showed a decline, except for
francophone listeners which tuned into our ethnic programming with a
20 percent increase. The proof is
that our advertising continues to grow.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15665 There
are problems with BBM measuring ethnic audiences, especially by the book
method. So we see a drop in one book but
continuing steady growth.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15666 Regarding
the 16 percent of the ethnic audience that tunes to ethnic radio, part of our
SRG report to you, this is a large figure.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15667 Keep
in mind ethnic radio is still largely appointment‑driven, it is not 24
hours a day, many groups are unserved or underserved, and no one says that
ethnic groups should be tuning only to ethnic media. This is not the point of ethnic media.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15668 Sixteen
percent probably represents total weekly tuning of over 160,000 people and is
close to the readership for ethnic newspapers, which are generally thought of
as being read by everyone in the community.
Sixteen percent is not a small figure at all.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15669 Regarding
AVR's comments, I will reiterate that CHCR will cooperate fully with AVR in
finding an appropriate technical approach to operating on the second
adjacent. We are looking forward to this
project with great anticipation and we would accept the condition proposed by
AVR as clarified with the Commission today.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15670 Thank
you to the Commission, to the Commission staff, for making this hearing process
as smooth as possible.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15671 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you very much, Mrs.
Griffiths. We don't have any
questions. Thank you very much. Thank you for attending.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15672 MS
GRIFFITHS: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15673 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mrs. Secretary.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15674 LA
SECRÉTAIRE : Maintenant, j'inviterais Yves Sauvé.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 15675 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Monsieur Sauvé, vous...
RÉPLIQUE / REPLY
LISTNUM
1 \l 15676 M.
SAUVÉ : Monsieur le président, Monsieur French, Madame Cram, membres du
Conseil, bonjour.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15677 Mon
nom est Yves Sauvé, et je suis accompagné, à ma droite, de M. Michel Mathieu.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15678 M.
MATHIEU : Re‑bonjour.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15679 M.
SAUVÉ : Est‑ce que c'est possible, Monsieur le président, de préciser
quelques petits points concernant l'équipe de... c'est très court, très bref.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15680 L'équipe
de CJVD FM sera composée au début de huit personnes : Yves Sauvé,
administrateur et animateur; un journaliste permanent; deux
animateurs/animatrices la semaine, réguliers; deux pigistes animateurs/journalistes
pour le week‑end; l'équipe comprend aussi deux représentants des ventes,
payés à commission.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15681 Alors,
il s'agit d'une station modeste mais efficace, dans un petit marché, et les
membres du personnel de la station seront à la fois polyvalents et
expérimentés.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15682 Je
veux rassurer le Conseil que j'ai les moyens d'implanter et d'opérer la station
projetée, et que les petits et moyens marchands, fort nombreux dans la
région ‑‑ ça été confirmé ce matin par les intervenants ‑‑
vont nous encourager.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15683 Alors,
la preuve aussi, c'est qu'on a eu l'appui de toutes les associations de gens
d'affaires, et, entre autres, aussi du regroupement des gens d'affaires de
Vaudreuil‑Soulanges, il y a eu des lettres d'appui qui regroupent plus de
1 000 personnes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15684 En
ce qui concerne les demandes de nos concurrents, International Harvesters
prétend qu'il est plus important de desservir Montréal parce que Vaudreuil‑Dorion
ne compte que seulement 70 000 personnes.
Sans étude de marché, comment peut‑il prétendre rejoindre
1 000, 5 000, 10 000 personnes?
On ne le sait pas.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15685 Nous,
ce qu'on sait, c'est qu'à Vaudreuil‑Dorion, notre marché cible est
composé d'un minimum de 70 000 personnes.
Au moment où j'ai préparé la demande, c'était des statistiques... on
parle de population de 2001. Maintenant,
il y a eu des augmentations, et ça fait autour de 75 000 personnes comme
marché cible dans Vaudreuil‑Dorion et ses villes sours.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15686 Maintenant,
concernant l'intervention de Neeti P. Ray, aucune étude de marché. Même chose.
Comment savoir, comment comprendre de cette requérante, comment
analyser? Il n'y a pas d'étude de
marché. On ne sait pas à qui il
s'adresse. On ne sait pas combien de
personnes. C'est très vague. C'est très flou.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15687 Même
chose pour M. René Ferron, pour qui j'ai beaucoup de respect, qui est un
monsieur qui connaît le monde de la télévision, mais en ce qui concerne... puis
je ne veux pas discuter de son projet, c'est un beau projet, mais là aussi, il
n'y a aucune étude de marché.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15688 Hellenic
câble canadien. Pourquoi CKDG diffuse
présentement en mono? L'exploitation du
106,3 sera‑t‑elle aussi en mono?
Et concernant la prétention de monsieur Fréchette hier, on a fait des
vérifications.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15689 Monsieur
Fréchette, qui est l'ingénieur attitré de Hellenic, qui, à un certain moment
donné, à la question posée par monsieur le président, est‑ce qu'il y a
une fréquence, parce que monsieur Mathieu n'a pas dévoilé la fréquence pour
Vaudreuil‑Dorion, alors là, il a donné un chiffre, et puis nous, on l'a
vérifié hier.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15690 Je
demanderais à notre conseiller en radiodiffusion de donner des précisions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15691 Alors,
Michel.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15692 M.
MATHIEU : Suite à cet énoncé, on a pris deux décisions. La première décision, je l'ai prise à
l'audience. J'ai téléphoné à M. Doug
McCauley (phon.), mon collègue ingénieur, et on a vérifié la fréquence que
monsieur Fréchette nous a identifié, le 101,3, et je vais vous identifier la
fréquence que nous, on avait trouvé, qui est le 100,1.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15693 Dans
le cas du 101,3, il faut protéger une station à Montréal, CIVL, une radio
communautaire. Alors, le site d'émission
est sur le stade olympique. On est
premier adjacent. Il faut le protéger
d'une façon telle qu'il faut être ‑11 dBk, c'est‑à‑dire ‑11
dB en bas d'un kilowatt. Ça veut dire
que la puissance maximale qu'on pourrait utiliser dans le mode omnidirectionnel
sur cette fréquence‑là, c'est 80 watts.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15694 Évidemment,
on n'a pas pu faire une étude hier soir avec des antennes directionnelles et
tout et tout, mais on sait une chose, la géographie étant ce qu'elle est, ça
veut dire un site entre Vaudreuil‑Dorion et le West Island de Montréal,
et pour avoir fait des recherches, Yves et moi, avant de vous présenter la
demande, ce n'est pas évident.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15695 Le
100,1, c'est la même histoire. Il y a
une station dessus à Trois‑Rivières qui contribue un niveau
d'interférence nettement supérieur à ce que nous, sur 106,3, on reçoit d'une
station américaine à Vaudreuil‑Dorion.
Même situation, mais là, la station à protéger est plus proche, elle est
à Ville LaSalle.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15696 Alors,
je peux vous dire une chose. On peut
trouver des fréquences à 50, 60, 80 watts, que si je m'impliquais en plein
milieu de Vaudreuil‑Dorion, je vais peut‑être desservir une partie
de la ville.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15697 Mais
je vais vous dire une chose, puis vous êtes sûrement au courant ‑‑
puis j'en ai installé des stations, Monsieur Joly est venu nous parler de
diffusion temporaire tantôt ‑‑ avec 50 watts, vous n'avez pas
de pénétration de signal. La pénétration
de signal, c'est le point que j'essaie de vous faire.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15698 Si
vous mettez un 100, 200, 300 watts sur le Mont‑Royal, vous allez avoir
une couverture sur papier, mais quand vous rentrez dans les maisons... en
voiture, vous n'avez pas de problème, mais quand vous rentrez dans les maisons,
c'est une autre histoire, quand vous voulez traverser la brique puis le ciment
puis tout ça.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15699 Le
problème de la station Jazz à Montréal... dans l'audience, on a parlé de
difficultés de la station Jazz à prendre son marché. J'habite dans le quartier Auteuil à
Laval. Je ne suis pas capable de capter
Radio Jazz comme du monde.
Pourquoi? Ils sont à partir du
même site que CKDG sur le Mont‑Royal.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15700 La
seule affaire qui sauve la station de monsieur Coaillier, c'est parce que lui,
il diffuse en haut de la tour du Mont‑Royal, complètement en haut du
candélabre. Il y a 8 kW, mais il a un
signal décent. Parce qu'il a la hauteur,
il n'a pas les obstacles.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15701 Moi,
ce que je suis venu vous dire, que ça soit M. Neeti P. Ray, que ça soit
International Harvesters, que ça soit Hellenic Cable, monsieur Ferron, c'est
tous le même problème, la fréquence donne un rayonnement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15702 On
vous a donné des populations. C'est vrai
que c'est plus nombreux en population que ce que nous, on propose, mais nous,
on va desservir le monde de Vaudreuil‑Dorion. Eux autres, ils vont avoir de la misère à
desservir le monde de Montréal parce que le signal ne sera pas là.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15703 Et
quand on vous donne des populations dans le .5 mV, je vous dis, attention,
regardez sur la carte de contour. On
vous a fourni toutes les cartes de contour avec tous mes clients. Il y a une zone hachurée, puis c'est tout en
couleur puis c'est très beau. Ça, c'est
une zone inutilisable à cause de l'interférence reçue, O.K.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15704 Vous
avez parlé ce matin avec AVR de problèmes possibles de IBOC. Bon, IBOC, on ne rentrera pas là‑dedans,
mais je vais vous dire quelque chose.
Moi, je suis un praticien, Je ne suis pas un ingénieur certifié, ça été
établi. Je suis sous serment, je
reconnais ça. Mais quand les stations
ont des problèmes, c'est moi qu'ils appellent.
C'est moi qui va voir les problèmes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15705 Je
vais vous dire quelque chose. Deuxième
adjacent à Montréal, bonne chance! Il
n'y a rien de sûr. Il n'y a pas de site
qui a été établi. On est en
négociation. Moi, je sais que j'ai une
pièce d'équipement que je loue à un de mes amis, parce que lui a installé AVR
d'une façon temporaire sur un site, sur une cavité, O.K. On a mis ça en ondes... il a mis ça en ondes
au mois de septembre. On est au mois de
mai, O.K. On est venu nous dire ce
matin, on travaille sur le site.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15706 Malheureusement ‑‑
et je suis désolé pour AVR là ‑‑ mais malheureusement là,
quand les négociations sont longues de même, ça ne sent pas bon. Alors là, on a un problème. AVR sont venus nous dire, et à raison, que le
site de la tour de Bell sur le Mont‑Royal est moins bon que l'édifice de
la Tour de la Bourse.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15707 C'est
évident. Vous allez manquer la rive sud
si vous êtes là, parce que vous avez un nul pour CFEI à Saint‑Hyacinthe. Techniquement, c'est plus haut. Vous allez peut‑être avoir un signal un
peu meilleur à Laval, mais vous allez manquer le centre‑ville de
Montréal, vous allez manquer Brossard, vous allez manquer dans ce coin‑là.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15708 Alors,
moi, je vous laisse avec ça, mais je vous dis une chose. C'est vrai que la proposition de monsieur
Sauvé, en théorie, elle rejoint moins de monde, mais lui va donner un service,
par exemple. Je pense qu'on l'a vu clairement
ce matin avec les interventions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15709 La
fréquence que vous allez donner à Montréal, j'ai eu le plaisir et le privilège
que monsieur Ferron m'adresse la parole.
J'ai eu le plaisir d'échanger avec lui, et je vais vous dire une chose,
c'est un bon monsieur, on est d'accord, mais je ne lui souhaite pas la
fréquence 106,3 parce qu'il n'a rien fait de mal à personne.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15710 Sur
ce, je vous salue. C'est très sincère.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15711 M.
SAUVÉ : Est‑ce que vous me permettez, Monsieur le président, de donner
quelques explications suite à une question, que vous nous avez posée quand on a
fait notre présentation, concernant une condition de licence. Vous avez sorti le journal, vous vous
souvenez, le journal de la région et tout ça, et c'était une condition de
licence, bon, pour qu'on ne puisse pas vendre à Valleyfield.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15712 Voici
mon explication. C'est évident qu'on ne
désire pas de condition de licence, mais je peux vous assurer qu'on n'a pas
d'équipe de ventes, on n'a pas de représentants qui iront solliciter les gens
du marché de Valleyfield. Mais une chose
très importante, c'est que ça devient compliquer une condition de licence quand
vient le moment de l'appliquer.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15713 M.
MATHIEU : J'ai vécu ça, ça devient très compliqué.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15714 M.
SAUVÉ : Je vais vous donner un exemple.
Supposons qu'à Vaudreuil‑Dorion, il y a, en fait, une chaîne de
restaurants qui n'existe pas...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15715 M.
MATHIEU : A Valleyfield.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15716 M.
SAUVÉ : Non, non, mais à Vaudreuil‑Dorion, c'est‑à‑dire
qu'à...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15717 M.
MATHIEU : A Vaudreuil‑Dorion, il y a un commerce...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15718 M.
SAUVÉ : A Vaudreuil‑Dorion, ça n'existe pas.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15719 M.
MATHIEU : O.K.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15720 M.
SAUVÉ : Supposons qu'il y a un magasin là, et... excusez‑moi.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15721 M.
MATHIEU : Ce qu'Yves veut dire, parce qu'on en a discuté... on s'excuse. Je suis quand même son conseiller.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15722 Vous
pouvez avoir... et je l'ai vécu dans une demande à Maniwaki. Vous pouvez avoir des commerçants ou un
commerçant à Valleyfield qui offre des services, des produits qui ne sont pas
représentés à Vaudreuil‑Dorion, et c'est tout à fait logique...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15723 M.
SAUVÉ : Voilà!
LISTNUM
1 \l 15724 M.
MATHIEU : ...que ces gens‑là vont venir nous voir pour annoncer,
pour attirer les gens de Vaudreuil‑Dorion.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15725 En
terminant... je vous retourne à monsieur Sauvé, mais en terminant, vous avez
les cartes de contour. La carte de CKOD
nous donne un demi‑millivolt au mètre à Vaudreuil‑Dorion. Nous, on n'a rien à Valleyfield.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15726 Puis
surtout, Monsieur Arpin, avec le bureau de commercialisation de la radio, vous
le savez, le meilleur argument de vente, on rentre chez le client, puis on met
la radio à la station de radio. Ça ne
sera pas possible à Valleyfield. Ils ne
nous capteront pas, surtout dans les commerces parce qu'on n'a même pas .5 là. Dans une auto, peut‑être. Mais on n'a pas .5.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15727 M.
SAUVÉ : Et on n'empêche pas, Monsieur le président, CKOD de venir vendre dans
la région de Vaudreuil‑Dorion et ses villes sours. On n'a aucune objection.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15728 M.
MATHIEU : Ils ont des droits acquis.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15729 M.
SAUVÉ : Ils ont des droits acquis.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15730 Maintenant,
est‑ce que vous me permettez juste une petite précision? Excusez.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15731 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Juste pour spécifier. En
fait, je comprendrais que votre... vous me le donner comme complément
d'information sur votre présentation, mais ça serait aussi la réplique que vous
faites à CKOD, qui a, elle, une intervention formelle au dossier?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15732 M.
SAUVÉ : Exactement, à laquelle on a répondu, Monsieur le président. Vous vous en souvenez, vous en avez sans
doute pris connaissance.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15733 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15734 M.
SAUVÉ : Est‑ce que c'est possible d'ajouter, concernant l'élément
nouvelles... ça va être très bref.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15735 LE
PRÉSIDENT : On est à la phase de répliques.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15736 M.
SAUVÉ : Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15737 M.
MATHIEU : Oui, mais il y a certains requérants qui ont...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15738 M.
SAUVÉ : Hellenic tantôt ont eu l'occasion, Monsieur le président, d'y
aller abondamment.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15739 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Oui, oui, mais vous avez déjà consommé 10 minutes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15740 M.
SAUVÉ : Juste rajouter ‑‑ si vous me permettez deux secondes,
Monsieur le président, s'il vous plaît ‑‑ que les informations
concernant les sources de nouvelles se trouvent dans notre demande. C'est la même chose aussi pour ce qui concerne...
c'est ça, les sources là, toutes les sources, tout ce qui a trait à
l'information fait partie de notre demande.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15741 Je
m'excuse parce que c'est un peu pénible, j'ai des douleurs. Je ne veux pas m'apitoyer sur mon sort, mais
c'est parce que j'ai des douleurs, puis lors de la présentation de lundi,
j'avais de la difficulté à avoir ma concentration. Bon, excusez‑moi.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15742 M.
MATHIEU : En terminant, Monsieur le président, juste mentionner, pour the
record, il y a plusieurs, et je répète, plusieurs fréquences AM très bonnes
disponibles à Montréal.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15743 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Écoutez, Monsieur Sauvé, vous avez joué un petit peu le
délinquant. Moi aussi, je vais le jouer
parce que j'avais oublié une question.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15744 M.
SAUVÉ : Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15745 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Dans votre demande, vous aviez écrit que vous étiez pour diffuser
des oeuvres canadiennes de langue française, de langue anglaise, et de toutes
les ethnies et cultures.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15746 La
question que j'ai oublié de vous poser, c'est de quelles ethnies on parlait.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15747 M.
SAUVÉ : Bien, c'est en général. Ça peut
être un chanteur, bon, du Québec qui est né ici au Québec, qui est de
nationalité asiatique.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15748 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Non, mais, en d'autres mots, ce que je veux assurer là, parce que,
étant donné qu'effectivement, on a parlé beaucoup de radio ethnique...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15749 M.
SAUVÉ : Bien oui, vous avez raison.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15750 LE
PRÉSIDENT : ...les deux derniers jours, je voulais m'assurer que ce n'est
pas...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15751 M.
SAUVÉ : Ce n'est pas une radio ethnique.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15752 LE
PRÉSIDENT : ...par la bande...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15753 M.
SAUVÉ : Ah! pas du tout.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15754 LE
PRÉSIDENT : ...un projet pour aller rejoindre des communautés ethniques.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15755 M.
SAUVÉ : Non, parce qu'au moment où j'ai fait ma demande, je me doutais qu'il y
avait d'autres demandes concurrentes, mais je ne savais pas quelles étaient ces
concurrentes‑là, pas du tout.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15756 LE
PRÉSIDENT : C'est une question que j'avais oublié de vous poser.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15757 M.
SAUVÉ : Elle est très pertinente, Monsieur le président.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15758 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Messieurs...
LISTNUM
1 \l 15759 M.
SAUVÉ : Merci beaucoup.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15760 LE
PRÉSIDENT : ...nous vous remercions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15761 Nous
remercions tous les requérants pour leur patience et pour la qualité de leur
présentation.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15762 Ceci
complète la quatrième phase de cette audience.
Nous apprécions votre présence et votre assiduité.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15763 We
want to thank you very much for all being here.
We want to particularly mention the high quality of your applications
and we appreciate very much your presentations and also to have accepted how
sometimes we interrupted you for various reasons, sometimes wrongfully, I will
have to admit.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15764 Thank
you very much.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15765 We
will break for lunch. We will come
back. We still have two applications to
deal with this afternoon.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15766 On
va prendre une pause pour le lunch. Nous
reviendrons à 14 h 00.
‑‑‑ Upon recessing
at 1234 / Suspension à 1234
‑‑‑ Upon resuming at 1410 / Reprise à
14 h 10
LISTNUM
1 \l 15767 THE
CHAIRPERSON: We are undertaking the last
portion of this hearing.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15768 THE
SECRETARY: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15769 We
will now proceed with Item 20 on the agenda, which is an application by Lee
David Weston on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated for a licence to
operate a community‑based English‑language digital service in
Toronto.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15770 Appearing
for the applicant is Mr. Lee David Weston.
You have 20 minutes to make your presentation. Thank you.
PRESENTATION / PRÉSENTATION
LISTNUM
1 \l 15771 MR.
WESTON: Thank you very much. I think everyone has thanked you for the
opportunity to appear. I am very
appreciative of it because I can actually show you things that I wouldn't be
able to otherwise.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15772 I
am going to get to the fun stuff a little bit later in the interesting things,
but just a few sort of mechanical kind of things.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15773 The
first thing I wanted to introduce is that the competition is different for
community broadcasters. You have heard a
lot of hearings and things and people are generally approaching it the same
way.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15774 For
us, competition for advertising isn't a big issue, at least not with
television, because none of the other broadcasters will want our
advertisers. We know this and you can
see this because you can just turn on Toronto television and you don't see
small advertisers, not small local businesses.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15775 So
we will have competition for advertising, but it will be with radio and it will
be with community print media.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15776 Our
competition is going to be for content.
This is a concern for us and this is why I want to introduce this
first. We come from a very different
direction than other broadcasters.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15777 In
the commercial market, broadcasters end up buying their content and having a
contractual agreement for delivery. The
community programming, what you are doing much more is development and it is
hard to have a contractual relationship with people for delivering content and
stuff like that. It is not how it works.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15778 Our
concern is obviously the other community stations operating in our environment
and what we don't want to happen with this licence is we do a great job of
doing development in the community and Rogers gets a lot of really good
programming.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15779 So
this is very important and this is where we are really coming from a different
perspective of many other broadcasters who are looking at advertising as the
big competitive issue. Then there is
bidding certainly for programming. But
again, it at least follows like a contractual kind of thing and you have some
expectation for your work that you get some return.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15780 This
also becomes very much how we structured a lot of things in our licence.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15781 So
the first question of this is: Are we
competitive with Rogers?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15782 Well,
we are not competitive with a BDU. There
are lots of advantages that they have.
What we are looking for ultimately is are we close enough to do it? We think if we are on a slightly disadvantage
that Rogers will probably maintain their approach. We understand their approach and we
understand there's a space to go into.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15783 So
quickly, I mean just to go over the advantages BDUs have, they have more
money. It partially has to do with the
licence size. It is also I don't
think you can ever develop, on the kind of program we are talking about, the
kind of revenue that they are deriving from their 2 percent. They have their network exemption and they
have the network to take advantage of it.
They use local avails, carriage on basic cable. So there is a bunch of things that they do.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15784 They
also have some future plans, Video‑on‑Demand and possibly becoming
a second‑tier network.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15785 So
we are looking at it as when a community producer is coming to us or looking to
place their programs, where are they going to place them?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15786 One
thing that makes a lot of difference to the independent community producers is
the audience they may get or they may not get.
Why I wanted to introduce this, although it is in the supplement, is we
have proposed something a bit unusual.
It confused the staff a bit. I
understand why and I just want to talk about it and explain it fully.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15787 We
were advised to apply for a portion of the city, which we have done. We then went out and talked to people and
said, "Okay, given a choice between all of Toronto on analog only on
Rogers or on digital cable only, only for a third of the city for all the BDUs,
which would you choose?"
LISTNUM
1 \l 15788 Everyone
we asked ‑‑ at the moment this would only be practising Bell
ExpressVu for Condos. If this comes up
again it may confuse people with things.
Bell ExpressVu for Condos is a very specific BDU not to be confused with
Bell ExpressVu Satellite. It certainly
confuses the public.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15789 They
all said, you know, "We want to be on Rogers."
LISTNUM
1 \l 15790 So
we kind of looked at this and we said okay.
A long time down the road when the CRTC has licensed the whole city, the
problem sort of solves itself for us, because you can get carriage on the
independent community stations across the city provided you can convince all
the community stations in the city to carry you. Whether it is appropriate to carry the thing,
they like it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15791 What
do we do in the meantime? So what we
suggest is that we would like to use the rest of the city until you license it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15792 Now,
we will lose portions of the city, but the independent community producer
won't. So this is how we manage to be
competitive in the eyes of the independent community producer while actually
maintaining this area that we were advised it would be appropriate to apply
for.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15793 Now,
this is where it causes problems because we think back to the 2000‑340
ruling, the previous application, and there was a great concern over ‑‑
the reason for turning it down was Scarborough‑specific content across
the city.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15794 That
is absolutely not what we are talking about.
We are talking about initially servicing all of the city and cutting
back as other licences occur. People
sort of go, "Wow, that's kind of weird, like a huge amount
work." Actually, it isn't.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15795 For
a lot of the things we are doing, our promotion, we will end up covering the
city. One of the advantages ‑‑
I mean, we talk about selling our own advertising. Most of the media cover Toronto and plus, so
if we are out hustling to try and get a radio interview to get our station
known, or trying to get on Breakfast Television ‑‑ I don't
know how CHUM will actually react to that, but they might be positive ‑‑
all of those activities will cover the whole area.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15796 At
the beginning, programming is going to be scarce on the ground, so it is not
like we are going to get overwhelmed with the programming we are getting from
the other areas. In a way, it is
actually making it easier for us because when you sort of go like, "Okay,
I think we're short of programming", do you go back and hit the same
sources trying to encourage more people or do you ‑‑ you know,
if you can go somewhere else it is better.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15797 Then
some of the big resources are basically citywide when you sit there and you
talk about like Humber or the Toronto Film School or something like that. If you divided it into three areas, you can't
really say they are in‑market or out‑market.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15798 So
we would service the whole area initially.
We will be doing most of the work no matter which of the sizes you give
us.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15799 So
I wanted to make clear that we are not talking about what was back in
2000. Our reason for doing this is to
hang onto these independent community producers to get the content in the first
place, because the most important thing to us is the content.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15800 It
will come up somewhere as we are talking about things, this is going to be the
first time, both in this decision and in the Rogers decision, the 2002‑61,
paragraph 36, which is the thing talking about Toronto, Montréal and Vancouver
is considered. There is some confusion
about it and I just wanted to point out where I think some of the confusion
comes from.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15801 The
actual regulation uses in it "in Toronto", "metropolitan centers
such as Toronto", "in Greater Toronto". Those are all different sized areas.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15802 I'm
not sure we need to talk about the different sized areas, but Rogers, Bell and
ourselves have taken different views on this, as it will come up.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15803 Our
view partially is that locality is a property of the programming so it really
shouldn't matter who is broadcasting it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15804 That
is kind of the boring part of what I wanted to say.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15805 What
I would again emphasize to the Commission, because it is different to what you
are used to with other broadcasters, is our primary concern is competition for
independent community producers. So we
want to be competitive in their eyes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15806 The
decisions that you have, both with this licence, with Rogers, with some stuff
that is coming up, can change that a lot.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15807 Well,
just remember that is where we are coming from.
Now, good.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15808 What
the station is supposed to do and what the Commission asked us to do explicitly
is to complement the BDU's service. This
is kind of a challenge in Toronto.
Rogers Television is about 40 years old.
It is the largest, richest, most sophisticated community television
station in the country. Simply offering
a poor man's version of this wouldn't really, in our opinion, have complemented
it. So we have taken a very different
approach.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15809 When
Roger speaks, they will criticize our approach.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15810 We
are very much saying that the two approaches together complement each
other ‑‑ I'm pausing for a second because I'm just a little
bit worried about your procedures and when you want someone to refute something
and not refute something.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15811 Our
proposal will meet the needs of many people in Toronto. I think that for a lot of people they will be
very happy with it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15812 There
will be people who would be better suited to going to Rogers and doing their
production at Rogers. We are not trying
to replace Rogers or say that that is inappropriate. We are trying to say that for a lot of people
this is a good solution and rather than having two stations taking the same
approach, one of which will always have less money, which will be us, we have
taken a very different approach, one that is based very strongly in one of the
key things in 2000‑261, the independent community producer.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 15813 MR.
WESTON: Why did I bring this giant beast
over here?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15814 This
is the latest and most advanced state of television technology ‑‑
well, it was in 1972. It has a single
picture tube which was revolutionary at that time. Sony describes it as
"portable". I brought it from
Toronto and I can assure you that ‑‑ yes. Well, they meant "portable" in the
fact you can put it in the trunk of a car, which is why I drove. I think have a tear in my suit where I was
lugging it in here.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15815 It
is not just the camera. This is an early
seventies camera. This is when community
television was really getting started in Canada.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15816 I'm
not going to talk to you about technology.
I don't want this to be about technology, but it is an approach to
technology.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15817 That
camera also dictates a whole bunch of other things that you were going to do in
1972. Behind the camera, sort of where
I'm sitting, would be something to record it, probably open reel stuff, and you
edited it with nonlinear editing, which can be painful. So you wanted to avoid that. So the sensible thing to do was to go to
multi‑camera shoots, typically three cameras; the picture we all have of
the director sitting there on the switcher picking which camera, talking to the
camera guys.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15818 That
avoided the editing problem and it also dictated that you were in a
studio. A bunch of other things actually
pushed you into the studio.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15819 Cameras
like this like a lot of light, so you need big trusses and you hang your lights
off there, and then you make sure that nobody rearranges the lights when you
are not in there.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15820 There
are other things as well. You ended up
doing makeup and stuff, but you had a general way ‑‑ this is
the general way of doing it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15821 The
next problem with the next thing that you decided, now that you were doing
multi‑camera shoots you wanted to do relatively long segments, say a
seven‑minute segment. It is very
hard for an amateur to make seven minutes of television without making a
mistake. I mean, the on‑air
talent.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15822 So
what you tended to move towards was semi‑professional and professional
interviewers and then community people as guests.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15823 I'm
looking behind me to see who is there from Rogers.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15824 I'm
not talking about Rogers specifically.
In fact, it is not even Canada specifically. America was doing the same thing. This was the general way that you did
community television because you had to.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 15825 MR.
WESTON: This camera beats that camera
every which way around, but it is not the only thing that would change about
it ‑‑ oh, before I go too much further, it is very
controversial in independent television making what is the minimum camera or
what kind of camera you should use.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15826 If
you don't like this camera, this is the ideal camera to use. Whatever you think the ideal camera is to
use, that's it. I'm not recommending a
specific piece of technology.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15827 When
you come to a camera like this, after the hearing I could go out on the front
steps, shoot some people leaving the hearings, do some kind of interview, take
it back to my hotel room, use this computer to do the nonlinear editing on
it. I could fix up the sound with sound
tools, do all the titling, voiceovers.
Tomorrow I could have a finished segment about this hearing kind of
stuff, all in the relative discomfort of my hotel room.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15828 So
why would I want to do this? Why is this
important?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15829 Well,
in that sense it isn't. What it is, is
if you can do it in the relative discomfort of your hotel room, the community
can do it in the community. This is
really what has not happened in community television. The technology has changed and the BDUs have
made some progress, but largely they work the same way as they did back when
this was height of technology.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15830 What
we are talking about in our application is taking advantage of the fact that
people are making this stuff; they are doing these things. Largely they are doing it outside of the
community television set‑up, outside of the structure that we have set up
for them.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 15831 MR.
WESTON: That brings me also to the whole
point of volunteers.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15832 Back
in the time of this TV, or this camera, the community stations were struggling
to get set up and they were short of volunteers. In the 1980s they testified they were short
of volunteers; in the 1990s they did. In
2002 they did and the CRTC didn't entirely take that. Today you still see in the hearings that they
are saying they are short of volunteers.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15833 Now
along comes YouTube. I don't want to
take YouTube too far, but what YouTube proves to me, and I think to a lot of
other people, is that whatever reason they are short of volunteers it is not
because the public isn't interested in self‑expression. They want to express themselves. It isn't that they are not interested in
community expression.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15834 We
are not offering them what they want, so they are going and putting things on
YouTube.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 15835 MR.
WESTON: Yes, we will go on to this.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15836 I
would also say that Rogers has recognized YouTube too, and they have come up
with their Video on Demand idea, which I think of them as responding to
YouTube. I think of it as completely
backwards. They are taking their same
all model of their sort of studio based presentation kind of thing and they are
going, okay, we will put it on Video on Demand and it will be like
YouTube. And you go no, you have missed
the point here. You want to adopt what
YouTube is telling you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15837 YouTube
is telling you the public does have an interest in creating this stuff, they do
have skills to do it. You want to make
it so that they can submit. You work
with them, rather than getting them to work with you on your old model.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15838 I
just want to see ‑‑ okay.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15839 THE
SECRETARY: I'm sorry, Mr. Weston.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15840 MR.
WESTON: Yes...?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15841 THE
SECRETARY: Your time is almost
over. Can you conclude?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15842 MR.
WESTON: Okay.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15843 I'm
going to show you some things.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15844 I
am looking at the Commissioners. Do you
people know Regent Park, if I say that word?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15845 THE
CHAIRPERSON: No.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15846 MR.
WESTON: All right. Regent Park could be described as "the
projects". It is the oldest housing
project in North America. You should be
very glad that you do not live there and even more glad that your children
don't. It is being fixed by the city,
but it has taken them 50 years.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15847 This
is a clip from what is called "Regent Park TV". I'm just going to play you their promo. They do this on ‑‑ this is
on YouTube. This has been taken off
YouTube. So why don't I just play it to
start with.
‑‑‑ Technical
difficulties / Difficultés techniques
LISTNUM
1 \l 15848 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Weston...?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15849 MR.
WESTON: Yes, I'm sorry. I'm going to stop. This is really discouraging. I was in here on Monday and I had this
working.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15850 These
are clips that people in this housing development are making. They are fairly good. They are not ‑‑ well,
actually they are good and you would be very impressed with them and they are
of a community television standard.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15851 I
was going to say ‑‑ I realized I wasn't going to have time to
do it ‑‑ "Ed the Sock" goes and covers exactly the
same turf and you can tell that Citytv does a better job than these guys. But they are actually producing community
television level stuff on their own.
There is a small city grant to do it.
And are putting it out on YouTube.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15852 There
is a lot of people doing this kind of stuff.
I thought this was pretty exciting because it is well‑known as one
of the worst places to live in Toronto and they are managing to achieve that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15853 I
guess I will have to stop and we don't get to see that part of the dog and pony
show. Oh well.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15854 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you, Mr. Weston.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15855 Commissioner
Cram...?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15856 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Thank you, Mr. Weston.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15857 The
only Regent Park I know is the one in London where the zoo is, so maybe I'm
happy I didn't see that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15858 We
are going to talk about your proposed service and a lot of these are going to
be regulatory issues that concern us from the point of view of what somebody
from the other side of the TV would see.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15859 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15860 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: You have agreed to a COL of
60 percent local programming.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15861 MR.
WESTON: I took basically what you had
written down. I did notice in the
previous applications that people had put it up to 95 percent Cancon and
you put it back to 80. So I just took
whatever was in the regulation.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15862 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: I am really going to ask you to
listen to my questions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15863 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15864 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: You have agreed to a COL for
60 percent local programming.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15865 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15866 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: That is defined as:
"station productions or
programming produced by community‑based independent producers that
reflect the particular needs and interests of the residents of the City of
Toronto."
LISTNUM
1 \l 15867 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15868 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: What kind of programming am I
going to see on the screen? Am I going
to see cartoons? Am I going to see
comedies? What am I going to see?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15869 MR.
WESTON: What I anticipate you seeing is
a lot of stuff coming out of the arts community and advocacy stuff, which is
basically the mainstay of a lot of other community programming. It is really the direction of where it is
coming from.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15870 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: "Advocacy", what you
mean by that?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15871 MR.
WESTON: I am thinking of how to say
it. People talking about what interests
them.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15872 I'm
a little bit ‑‑ I can't say "advocacy" is
"advocacy", but people talking about what interests them. It might be talking about global warming and
what they can do in Toronto about it; it might be youth‑based issues.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15873 We
are getting to a stage ‑‑ what everybody should dislike is TV
shows which are radio with pictures.
That would be advocacy at its worst, is people talking about what they
want and not taking advantage of the fact it is visual media.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15874 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right, talking heads at its
worst.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15875 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15876 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: This programming will not include
infomercials?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15877 MR.
WESTON: I think actually we put down in
our thing that we would do infomercials in the evening, but we weren't really
planning on doing it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15878 I
think you ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15879 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: But if I'm right, it is not even
Canadian content.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15880 MR.
WESTON: You mean the 60 percent local
and during the day?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15881 I'm
a little bit confused. Could you ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15882 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Infomercials are not Canadian
content.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15883 MR.
WESTON: I understand that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15884 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right. So you may have infomercials?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15885 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15886 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Corporate videos?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15887 MR.
WESTON: No.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15888 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: No. Promotions?
Promotional videos?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15889 MR.
WESTON: I am not quite understanding how
that is different from a corporate video.
But if I am understanding what you are saying, the answer is no.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15890 I
guess where I would add to that is we are very sensitive to ‑‑
you asked us a question about imbedded sponsorship or alternative
sponsorship. We are very sensitive to
the fact that this is something we are going to have to watch out for and that
you don't want the tail wagging the dog.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15891 I'm
sure people are going to try that and it is not going to be a trivial thing for
us to figure out. You know, if somebody
is getting some sponsorship from someone ‑‑ well, I will put
another way.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15892 Our
goal is that when people are making a show, they are making it for their own
reasons. They are making it for
community reasons. If they can get some
sponsorship along the way, that's great.
What we will try very hard to avoid ‑‑ and hopefully we
don't ever get tricked ‑‑ is somebody coming the other way
around and the corporates actually driving the agenda of the show.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15893 That
is something absolutely that we are going to try to prevent and I think we will
be fairly successful in preventing.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15894 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Would you be allowing brokered
programming on your service?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15895 MR.
WESTON: No, we wouldn't. When you ask the infomercials kind of thing,
we put the infomercials thing ‑‑ I think we are allowed to do
it and we have put it in ‑‑ as a sort of tool to deal with the
previous problem; that if we go to a show where somebody got to the point
of ‑‑ you know, we thought the sponsor was trying to take a
lead role or something, we would say, "Well, either back off or buy an
infomercial."
LISTNUM
1 \l 15896 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15897 So
there wouldn't be any brokered programming from religious brokered programming
or ethnic brokered programming?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15898 MR.
WESTON: No.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15899 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So ‑‑ I'm trying
to get there ‑‑ it is arts and advocacy. In terms of advocacy, would it be coverage of
seminars, that sort of issue?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15900 MR.
WESTON: First of all, we are taking sort
of a less proactive role with telling people what they are going to do. I wouldn't anticipate that as being a big
thing and I don't really see why it would be ‑‑ maybe I am
misunderstanding your question. I can't
see why it would be attractive programming and when we would want it from them.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15901 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15902 As
I read your application, it looked to me like ‑‑ and you talk
about the arts, arts, culture, that sort of thing. What is your evidence of a demand for such a
service?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15903 MR.
WESTON: Well, the strongest line that we
have taken on this is to quote the Senate.
The catch, which is what Rogers has been asking for, is
demographics. The demographics that
other stations would use are almost contradictory to the fact that you are
looking at community programming, because the commercial demographic is
designed to identify markets for major corporations to sell their products to.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15904 We
are looking at dealing with small businesses.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15905 On
the advertising side ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15906 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Mr. Weston, we are looking at
licensing something that will take capacity away from BDUs, which means money.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15907 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15908 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So we have to see that there is a
demand for such a service to justify us licensing it. So I have asked you the question: What is your evidence of demand for the kind
of arts culture programming that you are proposing?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15909 I
say that knowing full well that the high ratings go to reality shows these days
and that even high production value arts programming is being taken off the
airwaves. CBC has just taken their
culture arts programming off their Thursday evenings.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15910 So
I am asking you for evidence of a demand for this kind of programming.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15911 MR.
WESTON: All right. I am going to say that I don't have one, but
I don't think that that is the context you should be asking the question in.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15912 I
wonder if I could give you an alternative answer here.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15913 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Sure.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15914 MR.
WESTON: Which is, we have the quote from
the Second Century of Canadian Broadcasting.
"More often than not important
cultural and civic events, as well as local drama, comedy, sports and music are
not broadcast. An entire layer of
Canadian life and experience is missing from the screens and the
airwaves." (As read)
LISTNUM
1 \l 15915 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Why would people program that if
there is no viewership of it?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15916 MR.
WESTON: Well, that is the point and that
is why I understand we are in the community category.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15917 I
would turn your question around and look at 3.1(b) of the Broadcasting Act,
which says there is public, private and community broadcasting and say that is
the reason that you are broadcasting it, and that the driving thing for
community broadcasting is this statement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15918 The
driving rationale for community broadcasting is it's about self‑expression
and it's about community‑expression and that we have here the
justification for the fact that there is insufficient self‑expression and
community expression.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15919 Now,
I have discussed with community print media and some television people about
the ability to reach the advertising levels, the market share and the levels
that we are looking at, and there is some confidence in that. I don't know if that answers your question.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15920 But
the very precept that ‑‑ I don't want to be on the idea of
giving you an answer where I'm saying I'm going to make more money for Rogers
or we are going to get a comparable audience than a commercial station, because
we are not. We know that right off. Our market share is going to be very small
and we can't justify on the basis of capacity that we would get, you know, as
many viewers as SpikeTV or even The Shopping Channel. The Shopping Channel probably outdoes us and
it contains no programming whatsoever, as far as my understanding is.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15921 So
our rationale in competing is we are in the Broadcasting Act as a category
with, you know, private, public, community, and we have identified the
fact ‑‑ or an official report of the Department of Heritage
has identified the fact that there is a shortage of local expression and
community expression.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15922 So
this is where we feel that we justify the carriage.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15923 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right. So by licensing what we have licensed we
haven't covered the field sufficiently, in your view.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15924 Is
that your answer?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15925 MR.
WESTON: Well, I only question, when you
say "my view" is ‑‑ I will read you the quote of the
official report from the Department of Heritage and you will have to make that
determination. But it's not me saying
it; it is the report I'm quoting.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15926 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15927 I
am going to get up in the morning, I am going to turn on my TV and I am going
to tune into you and I am going to see in the morning, if I understand you,
something quieter ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15928 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15929 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: ‑‑ and then as the day goes on, louder. And it will be arts, culture and
advocacy. Is that ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15930 MR.
WESTON: That is primarily what we would
expect the community to produce.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15931 If
someone comes up with scripted drama, that's great. I'm not expecting a lot of it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15932 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Yes. These arts and culture things, you are not
talking the Hummingbird Theatre; you are talking smaller plays, smaller ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15933 MR.
WESTON: Absolutely. I don't know which way around you are coming
at that, but I am going to say it both ways around. What a lot of people think of as sort of
second tier, third tier, you know, maybe it's almost community theatre, in
Toronto is ‑‑ in Toronto if you went to another centre,
someone might go as professional theatre.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15934 And
at the same time something like the Lion King, as far as I'm concerned, it
isn't arts or culture; it's spectacle.
But we are not talking about that at all, no.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15935 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right. I am going to use an example that I know
because I'm from Regina.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15936 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15937 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Every year our symphony has an outdoor
concert.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15938 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15939 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: We have lots of people to come and
lots of kids and they play classical and they play The Lion King. It would be that sort of thing that you would
be proposing to cover, or what?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15940 MR.
WESTON: Okay. That would never get covered from rights
issues and stuff like that. Plus if it's
anything like the Toronto Symphony, the Toronto Symphony is also union and I'm
not quite sure where that would get us.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15941 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Okay. So let's go into ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15942 MR.
WESTON: I'm not understanding really
what you are asking.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15943 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: I want to go into the rights
issues if you are talking about it anyway.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15944 These
would be cultural events for which there would be no copyright existing or for
which you would pay no broadcast rights fees.
Is that right?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15945 MR.
WESTON: Again, we are going to be
relying heavily on the independent community producers to decide what they are
going to do. The kinds of music that
they most commonly are going to be able to access is going to be public
domain. So if it's the symphony, if it's
a really, really dead guy, it's public domain.
Or music from people they know in the city.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15946 It
is possible ‑‑ and I know people who have done it and I think
I have done it myself ‑‑ to license stuff from commercial
sources. It's a lot of work. I would never recommend it for a community TV
show because by the time you have sorted out the rights and done it, you will
be six months into it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15947 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So when you say you are not going
to pay any copyright fees ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15948 MR.
WESTON: I said broadcast fees. Well, copyright fees, I mean we will pay
SOCAN.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15949 Oh,
we are not going to pay synchronization fees and what goes to CMRRA.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15950 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15951 MR.
WESTON: That will be up to the
independent community producer to work out.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15952 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right. So any issues of copyright that would accrue
to the producer are their problems. Is
that fair to say?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15953 MR.
WESTON: Yes, it is.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15954 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right. You are not going to pay any broadcast
rights.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15955 MR.
WESTON: No, and that is standard in the
community television field.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15956 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: What about any limitations on the
number of repetitions or anything like that?
Are you going to have any deal with the producer?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15957 MR.
WESTON: Of course we will have a
deal. I think we said we will have a
standard ‑‑ the standard thing will allow us just for, you
know, broadcast for a short period and we would allow people to say, "Do
you wanted it broadcast more?" Some people will want as many repeats as
they can get and some people won't.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15958 If
somebody has a special need, like if somebody is doing an interview show and
for some reason they get somebody who is well‑known who their management
says, you know, "This can only be broadcast once and it can only be
broadcast on this day", we would work with someone to work that out, yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15959 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Would you be contemplating
sourcing some of your material from the internet?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15960 MR.
WESTON: No. I mean, I can't think why you would do it,
but one of the reasons is you are just not going to get the quality. But also I don't see how you would clear the
rights.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15961 I
can't see it really being viable myself.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15962 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: I think I have it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15963 Cancon,
Canadian content, is 80 percent.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15964 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15965 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: You have proposed that under
production costs of $2,000 we would require no certification.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15966 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15967 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: You would keep the records
provided you by the producer,
LISTNUM
1 \l 15968 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15969 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: You would agree to a COL that you
would keep these records as delineated in your application and that you would
provide them to us on request?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15970 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15971 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15972 I'm
not good in math, but it seems to me that you are going to have original
programming, the first year 450 hours, up to the fifth year of 1100 hours.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15973 MR.
WESTON: I just want to shuffle papers;
but if that's what we wrote down, that's right, yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15974 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right. Then there is local programming and you said
in the first year you are going to have 400 hours of original local
programming ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 15975 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15976 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: ‑‑ and 200 hours of local first‑run programming.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15977 MR.
WESTON: Yes. That sounds right, yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15978 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Where would these be produced and
by whom?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15979 MR.
WESTON: Well, they would be produced in
Toronto by independent community producers.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15980 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Yes. You are confident that you can get this
amount of product.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15981 MR.
WESTON: I am confident and I do
acknowledge it's going to be a struggle in the first two years. This is why we were looking at inventory and
stuff like that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15982 I
will say to you right now that we will be taking higher standards ‑‑
yes, we will be applying higher standards as time goes on, which is something
you see in commercial broadcasting, too.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15983 It
is going to be a struggle because the community isn't conditioned to doing it,
isn't used to being able to do this. We
think we can make those numbers. We
think in the first year, like someone who is doing advocacy, we may give them
more time to talk. If they are repeating
themselves, we will let them do another show and repeat themselves. We wouldn't do that in subsequent years.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15984 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So based on that 600 hours, the
400 of original local and the 200 of local first‑run, staff has estimated
that to meet your 60 percent requirement over your 24‑hour broadcast
day year, that would mean you would need to 5,069 hours of local programming,
which would mean it would be 8.5 repeats of that 600 hours.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15985 MR.
WESTON: Okay.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15986 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So that is what I would see on the
screen the first year. I would see eight
to nine repeats of music for which there is no copyright or art festivals for
which no copyright is held.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15987 MR.
WESTON: Yes. Just with the copyright thing, there would be
copyright. Music would always be
copyrighted and we would encourage people actually who try and bring us stuff
which isn't registered with SOCAN to register it with SOCAN.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15988 It
would be where you have managed to arrange the copyright with the person. It's exactly the same as if you were dealing
with Bruce Springsteen, except for the fact that the reason you are not dealing
with Bruce Springsteen is you won't be able to.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15989 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15990 So
you expect these producers to authorize you to repeat their work any number of
times then?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15991 MR.
WESTON: I suppose, or within a period,
yes. I hadn't worked it out that way
that if it is 8.9 repeats, then it would be over a week or over two weeks. Or in the case that some people want their
stuff shown a lot, as much as we can.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15992 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15993 So
then I want to talk about your controls.
You have agreed to a condition of licence that you would adhere to
industry codes. Who in the management of
your station would be ultimately responsible?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15994 MR.
WESTON: Ultimately, it would be me.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15995 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right. You would have policies to restrict but not
prohibit coarse language and nudity, obviously, and your principle would be
that the programming meets government and licence requirements.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15996 MR.
WESTON: Well, as a minimum, yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15997 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Initially you proposed volunteer
committees to initially review this programming. Is that correct?
LISTNUM
1 \l 15998 MR.
WESTON: That is correct.
LISTNUM
1 \l 15999 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: You talked initially about how
easy it was to get volunteers in programming.
What about volunteers to evaluate programming?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16000 MR.
WESTON: That will not be as easy.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16001 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: What kind of training would you
envisage for them?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16002 MR.
WESTON: One of the sources that we are
actually hoping to get is people associated with some of the ‑‑
for some of them, is people associated with the various educational things.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16003 The
sort of carrot for that is that they are going to want to produce material and
if they are going to ‑‑ if we let them set up their own
committees to review material from their school, we would sort of go "and
we want you to review some other materials as well."
LISTNUM
1 \l 16004 This
would give them basically easier turnaround in dealing with things. If there are times when we, you know, don't
have a review committee and there isn't staff time, your program is going to
wait to be reviewed.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16005 So
that is one of the sources that we are really looking at for people initially
for that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16006 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So you would sort of trust a
broadcasting school maybe or, I don't know, Ryerson students to give you
programming, but the students or the faculty to ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 16007 MR.
WESTON: Someone involved with a faculty
and things like that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16008 I
would also say, I mean, there is a certain amount of commonsense that has to be
involved in recognizing that some kind of programming is going to require more
attention than others.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16009 I
don't want to make light of your questions and stuff, but we are expecting that
90 percent of the programming there is not going to be much of an issue
with. If you are anticipating something
that you know is going to be problematic ‑‑ and you can
probably anticipate it ‑‑ that we take extra care as well.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16010 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right. So I have it all figured out that it goes to
the volunteer committee and then it if there are problems, then it at goes up
to your hired staff. Is that the idea?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16011 MR.
WESTON: That is the idea. There is actually a deliberate sort of reason
for that, as well as the one you might think, which is we don't want people
being put in the position where they are being sympathetic with the person who
has created it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16012 So
if they were seen to be the person who killed it, they might be hesitant
to. If they just flag it as "we
think this is an issue" and then send it to the staff, they will be more
likely to flag things.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16013 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: I was thinking there would be
another issue if I were you in my mind with advocacy type of programming. There would be libel and defamation issues,
and it could be get to be quite a little thorny issue.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16014 I
suppose you would have to be concerned about that also.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16015 MR.
WESTON: That is a concern and I think
perhaps you are using a narrower definition of "advocacy" than I
am. I am including someone who wants to
talk about bicycling in the city and bicycle paths and stuff like that. I'm not simply thinking of people who want to
say nasty things about George Bush or McDonald's.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16016 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: The other thing is, you said in
here that you were going to have a policy, ostensibly because it would be more
convenient for your producers, that they could bring ‑‑ if
something was slated to be broadcast after 6:00 p.m., they could bring their
productions in by noon and you would review it and get it on.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16017 Now
that is predicated on having your volunteers ready there and somebody in
management, I suppose.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16018 MR.
WESTON: This would be specifically for
someone who has a weekly show, like something that has been set up in advance
and is doing a weekly show.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16019 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16020 I
wanted to talk about sponsorship financing.
Do I have it right that you would say to a producer, "Okay, find a
sponsor and you also get" ‑‑ do they find the advertiser
also, some of the advertisers?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16021 MR.
WESTON: No.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16022 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So the producer would find a
sponsor, you would find the advertisers, and you would get 20 percent of
the revenue from the ads?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16023 MR.
WESTON: No, no. I think we are completely ‑‑
we are looking at the advertising that we are selling as our business. That is how we pay our bills.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16024 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16025 MR.
WESTON: The sponsorship is a way for
them to help make their production costs.
It is also something to be competitive with Rogers, because Rogers
offers that. This is coming back to
being competitive with the independent community producers.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16026 I
would like to be able to say okay, they keep 100 percent of the
sponsorship. There are a couple of
reasons for not saying that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16027 One
is that what we are actually doing is selling advertising. That is our advertising to do.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16028 Another
reason is, I don't want them lowballing the amount that they are selling their
sponsorship for because it is actually going to be a pain in the neck for us to
do. It is going to disrupt our
advertising sales. The systems that we
are looking at for scheduling advertising aren't that sophisticated. Unfortunately, the sophisticated systems are
more than our annual revenue. So there
is a bunch of manual work.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16029 So
if someone sold a sponsorship for $50, it would be a real pain in the neck for
us to deal with it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16030 I
anticipate in the first year or so probably not even retaining any of it, but
we would in the future, or we might in the future. So it is put down there because I don't want
to do something and then, you know, come back to the Commission and do it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16031 But
that is our thinking. It is a lot of
work for us. It is a lot of work for us
to do potentially, especially if, you know, the sponsorship is wrong or
something. They are going to call us,
whoever has provided the sponsorship clip, or I guess we are going to call them
and say your 36‑second sponsorship clip is 37 seconds, or whatever it is.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16032 So
we can get roped into a fair amount of work on that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16033 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right. So the producer finds the sponsor?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16034 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16035 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: The sponsor has to pay a minimum
amount?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16036 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16037 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: The sponsor pays that minimum
amount to...?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16038 MR.
WESTON: They would pay it to us and we
would ‑‑ what we would see is they would pay it to us and we
would remit it to the independent producer.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16039 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So you would do the billing and
collection.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16040 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16041 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16042 MR.
WESTON: Really, we are looking at it as
a service for the independent community producer, is that we are doing that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16043 I
also think in the terms of like initially there is going to be a fair ‑‑
well, throughout the thing, a fair number of people are probably going to get
angel sponsors.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16044 Do
you know what I mean? Like a sponsor who
is someone's daddy is Vice‑President of a big corporation. They probably wouldn't want to write the
cheque their Son Inc. production company.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16045 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So you would say you would get
20 percent of the revenue of that sponsorship? Do I have that right?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16046 MR.
WESTON: If you have worked it out as
20 percent, that's fine. It is a
fixed amount.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16047 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16048 MR.
WESTON: We are taking a fixed amount
basically to recover our costs and, at least on the single issue sponsorship,
to prevent people from like selling them for $20.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16049 But
if somebody goes out and finds themselves a $25,000 sponsor, whatever we have
said we are going to take ‑‑ oh, yes, we did that example.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16050 If
we are taking $1,000 and they have gone and found themselves a $25,000 sponsor,
we are still only going to take $1,000.
We are not doing this to try and make money out of it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16051 I
did work out somewhere, it is a very small percentage of our revenue that this
sponsorship thing does. It is to protect
us really from people going out and doing a whole bunch of really cheap
sponsorship deals and undermining our commercials.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16052 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16053 If
I understand it correctly ‑‑ and it looks like I don't, but I
will keep going.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16054 If
I understand it correctly, that program will only run once with the sponsor as
sponsored. Thereafter, on any repeats it
will run with ads. Do I have that?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16055 MR.
WESTON: That would be the intention,
yes. If somebody wants to do more, they
can. We can work something out, but that
would be the primary intention.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16056 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16057 MR.
WESTON: I would ask you to remember that
what we are talking about is sponsorship outside the program time. Like Rogers, when they run things, they
actually can schedule the sponsorship inside the show. We can't do that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16058 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right. Then there are program grants that you are
going to be giving to ‑‑ can I call it potential producers?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16059 MR.
WESTON: Yes, if you like. I'm hoping that ‑‑ I'm
assuming that they will ‑‑ yes, if you like.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16060 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Because you say you may never get
the programming, you know, that you advanced the money for.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16061 MR.
WESTON: Okay. Rogers picked up on that too and I think
there is far too much emphasis put on that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16062 The
reason that we did this is that myself, Mr. Sladek(ph) have both been directors
of charities, which is a foundation ‑‑ and there is a specific
meaning to foundation. So we are fairly
sensitive to the word "grant".
And we were really trying to explain how we use the word "grant"
in this case.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16063 But
what we have said is quite true. If you
are dealing with a little independent producer and he said he needed $500 to do
something and we never get the result, there is not really practically much we
can do about it. That's all we are
saying.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16064 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: And the amount that you will be
giving out in these grants is ‑‑ I thought it was $25,000 the
first year and 10 percent of gross thereafter. Am I right on that?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16065 MR.
WESTON: Yes. And we have put $25,000 in the year before
the first year.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16066 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So it's 25 the year before launch,
25 year of launch and 10 percent of gross revenue thereafter.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16067 MR.
WESTON: Yes. And in fact I think there might be ‑‑
well, actually I will tell you the way we are looking at it, which is actually
even a bit better than that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16068 The
year before launch in the first year is $50,000 and each subsequent year we are
planning on paying $50,000 or 10 percent of gross whichever is larger.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16069 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Okay. And you would agree to a COL to that effect?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16070 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16071 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16072 And
you would agree to a COL to provide us with annual reports on the disbursement
of the monies?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16073 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16074 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Now, distribution. Your financial projections are based on
distribution with whom?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16075 MR.
WESTON: You are asking me which
BDUs? Well, at the moment Rogers is the
only one that matters. I mean, we have
put down Bell ExpressVu for condos but they have a very small market share. And we have put down Bell's ‑‑
and I don't know what they are calling it: their 2004‑496 application.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16076 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Their telco cable.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16077 MR.
WESTON: Yes. Which might be big 10 years from now or five
years from now, so we have put it down.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16078 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Tell me ‑‑ and
you know you are only entitled to a must offer on terrestrial BDUs.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16079 MR.
WESTON: Absolutely, yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16080 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: And it is your assertion that
Bell, Bell ExpressVu for condos, is terrestrial?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16081 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16082 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: And you base that on...?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16083 MR.
WESTON: First of all, how Bell ExpressVu
for condos ‑‑ I'm just going to call it for condos if no one
minds ‑‑ came about was they had the Bell ExpressVu licence,
the satellite licence, and they wanted to offer a terrestrial service. But they didn't apply for a terrestrial BDU
licence. They added it on to their
satellite licence.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16084 At
that time this policy didn't exist so it really wasn't something to consider. 2002‑61 didn't exist. The way we look at it is it is terrestrial;
it runs on wires. There is a local head‑end. Why wouldn't it apply to us? Why wouldn't we be able to apply for it?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16085 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: You are proposing that your
coverage would be by postal codes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16086 Now
are you aware whether or not Rogers condos or Bell telco cable would be capable
of doing that?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16087 MR.
WESTON: They were specifically advised
to apply that way by Commission staff, who indicated that their understanding
was that that is how it would work and that this was the way that they could
divide up the city in an arbitrary way.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16088 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So you don't know.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16089 MR.
WESTON: We have not looked into it
beyond that, no.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16090 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So you are going to end up like,
I'm going to say ‑‑ well you are. You are going to be a diginet in a
discretionary universe, in a digital discretionary universe.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16091 Did
you ‑‑ well you are not asking to be put on analog.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16092 MR.
WESTON: Yes. No, you were using words which I was not
familiar with.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16093 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So it is a digital discretionary
universe. The only requirement of the
BDUs in question would be that they offer your service.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16094 MR.
WESTON: That is not my understanding of
the regulation ‑‑ of the policy.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16095 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: But you are not going to be over
the air, are you?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16096 MR.
WESTON: No.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 16097 MR.
WESTON: I'm fairly sure we get mandatory
carriage because Bell and Rogers both objected.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16098 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right. I have just had a senior moment.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16099 Have
you looked at the BBMs or do you know the BBMs for RTV on digital?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16100 MR.
WESTON: No, I don't.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16101 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Because it seems to me that it is
a different universe; that although you have to be bought if you are to be on
basic, it seems to me that people on digital look at their TV totally
differently and they search for their TV differently. They have a different program guide and it's
a totally different concept. You don't
have the prominence that you would have had on analog.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16102 MR.
WESTON: I agree with you, yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16103 I
would actually go a little step further and say that people who tend to
subscribe to digital television tend to be more entertainment junkies than
people on analog, and entertainment junkies are not the best audience for
community television.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16104 So,
yes, it is not ideal but this is what you are offering so this is what we have
applied for.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16105 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: And your plans on transmission to
the BDU are, if I can say, fuzzy at best.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16106 Can
you tell me in your financial projections where the costs are, the expenses?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16107 MR.
WESTON: I am just going to have to flip
to that page.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16108 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Look to your application, at pages
8 and 9. And it is item 4.1.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16109 MR.
WESTON: 4.1.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 16110 MR.
WESTON: Okay, I'm there.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16111 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So where are your transmission
expenses in those projected expenses?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16112 MR.
WESTON: I'm assuming they are in
technical. I'm assuming they are in
technical.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16113 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Do they change based on the
various scenarios that you laid out, I think three alternatives in your
supplementary brief? Do they go up or
down?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16114 MR.
WESTON: Just bear with me.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16115 Could
you actually tell me where in my supplementary brief?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16116 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: You were talking about you could
collocate, how you were going to transmit the signal to the BDU.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16117 MR.
WESTON: They don't go up and down if you
combine rent with transmission. In other
words, we might be able to say where we save on rent, the transmission will be
higher; where the transmission is higher, the rent would be lower.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16118 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So then that is where you have
your rent also under technical.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16119 MR.
WESTON: Yes. And if I could express why ‑‑
I know there is a haziness there and if I could just express why for a minute.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16120 People
would be sensitive to the fact that the cost of our transmission will depend on
where we locate within the city. The
cheapest place for like doing a collocate or something would be around King and
Bay.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16121 I
used to work in First Canadian Place.
It's a fine place to work. It's
not a good place to run a community television station.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16122 There
are some really good other options out on Danforth, Danforth and Bloor. We really want to be near a subway.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16123 But
in that case it's going to be a complicated deal to work out, trying to figure
out where a CO is or if we can piggyback on someone else and then finding a
cheap space at the same time. And
certainly with the Toronto real estate market, you can't really say okay, we
are going to start broadcasting in three years.
The only way to get a place is to sign a long‑term lease today.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16124 So
if we get stuck, we get pushed towards King and Bay and collocating with
somebody. But that's not where we want
to be.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16125 I
mean, King and Bay is on the subway; it does have that advantage. But that's the catch.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16126 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So technical includes your rent,
utilities. Is that correct?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16127 MR.
WESTON: Now I am wishing I had brought a
more detailed budget to do this with.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16128 No. Rent would be an administration in general, I
believe.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16129 I'm
worrying about what I just said to you.
My answer is I don't know. I
can't remember where rent was put.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16130 There
may have been a distribution of it across ‑‑ for the various
purposes of technicals, sales and administration and the different
categories. And that's what I would
normally do is distribute the ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 16131 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So you would prorate the common
costs across the various personnel kind of thing. Is that right?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16132 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16133 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Or the various program, like
people, technical, that sort of thing.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16134 MR.
WESTON: Right. Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16135 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: I'm sorry, maybe I have had
another seniors moment.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16136 In
your programming expenses you have cash and non‑cash. What does non‑cash mean?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16137 MR.
WESTON: Non‑cash is basically the
personnel who we have assigned to assist independent community producers. And why we feel justified in putting that in
is for a traditional broadcaster, when they get something, it's a tape and they
can air it. And when we work with an
independent community producer, we are helping them get to the stage where we
can air the material.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16138 So
we put that down as a production expense.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16139 I
mean, if we had our own director we would probably ‑‑ would we
put it in ‑‑ we would put it in a programming category. In this case it's our assistance to the
independent community producers to get their product ready to air.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16140 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So that is time spent.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16141 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16142 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: In assisting. So that could easily be a person in there?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16143 MR.
WESTON: That basically is a person, or
whatever. A prorated person. I can't remember.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16144 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Okay. Now where is your ‑‑ I'm
going to call it CCD, the program grant money?
Yes, program grants.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16145 MR.
WESTON: I broke that out much better in
one of the letters of clarification.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16146 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Give me a date and I'll get it
together.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16147 MR.
WESTON: February 7th.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16148 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right. Which page?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16149 MR.
WESTON: I'm getting there. Page 13.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16150 I
hope this is what you are looking for.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16151 Why
I took you away from that summarized budget is we are also looking at station
sponsorship. We are hoping to actually
have the station sponsored, and I think you want to know about what the
independent ‑‑ that's lumped in on our summary budget but it
is broken out here.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16152 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So I am going to look at year two,
$61,000. That would be year two on your
projections.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16153 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16154 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Where is that $61,000 expensed out
in your projections?
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 16155 MR.
WESTON: I'm just seeing if I was getting
this right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16156 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Maybe you can ‑‑
LISTNUM
1 \l 16157 MR.
WESTON: When you are looking at the
programming line for year two?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16158 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16159 MR.
WESTON: We have broken cash and non‑cash.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16160 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16161 MR.
WESTON: And you see the cash.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16162 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Yes. And then, the next year, 69, 68, 88. So in fact that programming ‑‑
those programming grants, at least insofar as year two on, are the totality of
your cash programming costs.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16163 MR.
WESTON: Yes, they are. Because we put this in second, because we
made the commitment of 10 percent after we did this in part of a
clarification, we did something which probably we would have done differently.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16164 In
one of these years, 10 percent I believe should be $51,800 and we have
$50,000 but we had left a contingency there.
So it would come out of the contingency.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16165 So
in fact year ‑‑ I'm looking at the wrong one.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16166 One
of those $50,000 is $51,800 with the $1,800 coming out of the contingency.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16167 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: All right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16168 You
were talking about collocating. You are
not planning on having a studio at all, are you?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16169 MR.
WESTON: No.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16170 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Do you have any pre‑launch
costs, aside from the $25,000 for program grants?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16171 MR.
WESTON: Yes, there are some pre‑launch
costs which is basically being the office and setting up and dealing with
people, because I mean we need programming to air on day one. And this is basic.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16172 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: And you are going to do this all
with 2‑1/2 staff.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16173 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16174 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Now that I have heard you, it
makes more sense because in year one I am looking at 2‑1/2 staff and I am
looking at what may be salaries and it didn't look very good. But if you have the 40 for the other person
in programming.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16175 So
what are the positions that the people are going to be?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16176 MR.
WESTON: There will be a station manager. I don't have ‑‑ I can't
remember the title we have.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16177 The
next person's job is dealing with the independent community producers and to
coordinate the review committees. The
station manager's job is going to be to deal with the station managing, the
advertising.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16178 It's
one of the reasons that we intend to have completely commissioned advertising
sales, is to keep the staff down. It's a
small number. I wish it could be bigger
but, you know, we will come to the point where Rogers says well, your staff is
too small and your expenses are too low and your revenue ‑‑
whichever way around it is.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16179 It
is a squeeze to do this kind of programming.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16180 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Okay. Thank you very much.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16181 MR.
WESTON: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16182 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Thank you, Mr. Chair.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16183 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Weston, only one
question.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16184 Again
to bring you back to section 4.1, which are of the financial operations, I note
that your revenues are suffering a big drop when you arrive at year four. So what is your assumption?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16185 MR.
WESTON: Our assumption is at that stage
you license someone else in the city and our actual carriage area goes down.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16186 THE
CHAIRPERSON: But your expenses are
rather somehow stable, so that is why you are incurring a loss.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16187 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16188 THE
CHAIRPERSON: I note also that you are
going to be a for‑profit organization, commercial organization, and you
will be owning all the shares. Am I
right?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16189 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16190 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Who is Mr. Sladek?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16191 He
is going to be one of your directors and as a matter fact your treasurer.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16192 MR.
WESTON: Yes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16193 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Who is he?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16194 MR.
WESTON: Well, he works as an engineer at
Ontario Hydro during the day and has for a number of years. He is involved in his outside work time in
various arts and community oriented things.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16195 Right
now when you say he is the treasurer, I've been involved in a not‑for‑profit
which operates a small community hall and does basically art presentations and
some of the advocacy stuff we are talking about.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16196 I
just fished him into becoming president of that last year because I thought it
needed more financial control and structure.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16197 THE
CHAIRPERSON: And he will be investing
money in the project but will not have shares.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16198 MR.
WESTON: That's right. He has offered to provide a line of credit.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16199 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay. Who is Isabel Hilda Weston?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16200 MR.
WESTON: The person you borrow money from
when no one else wants to lend it to you.
My mother.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16201 THE
CHAIRPERSON: I see. That's fine.
I understand that. It does
happen, you know. The story of
Québecor. It all started with $5,000
that Pierre Péladeau borrowed from his mother and now the corporation last year
made $11 billion. So it's got to have a
starting point.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16202 Also
I see a Mr. Christos Peter Cortez(ph), who is going to be a director of your
organization.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16203 What
type of background does he have?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16204 MR.
WESTON: His background is, in a sense,
similar to Mr. Sladek's although he usually tries to avoid becoming a director
of like not‑for‑profits and stuff like that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16205 He
is an electrical engineer. Right now he
is working at Grand and Toy. He also has
a Masters in ‑‑ and I'm trying to remember the word ‑‑
ergonomics.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16206 THE
CHAIRPERSON: And I see yourself, because
that's on page 35 of your supplementary brief, that you personally are a
business system analyst and programmer with some 20 years of experience.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16207 But
what kind of experience do you have to make happen the project that you have
put before us?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16208 MR.
WESTON: I think the biggest experience
that ‑‑ well, you can put it one of two ways.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16209 There
are two complete sides as to what has to happen. One side is to have a small stable business
operating, and I think this is in the sort of league of experience I've had of
this size of business. The other side of
things is although we are a for‑profit organization, a lot of what we are
dealing with is going to be not‑for‑profit or people who are ‑‑
they are not even structured organizations.
Someone wants to make a TV program for some purpose.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16210 So
I have the background in both those kinds of things.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16211 Somewhere,
I mean Rogers will get around to sort of ‑‑ like one of the
things they said was no experience dealing with volunteers. For about five years I used to do an event
where 400 volunteers reported to me.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16212 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Basically, you make the
claim that you have the experience to have your project happen and achieve the
goal.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16213 MR.
WESTON: I believe I have solid
experience on both those fronts, which is not all that common.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16214 THE
CHAIRPERSON: All right.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16215 Mr.
Weston, thank you for this part. We will
hear the intervenor and you will have a chance to come back to reply to the
interventions.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16216 MR.
WESTON: Thank you very much.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16217 I've
got papers spread everywhere so if I could just have a moment.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 16218 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16219 Madame
la Secrétaire.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16220 THE
SECRETARY: We will now proceed to Phase
II in which the intervenor appears.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16221 I
will now ask Rogers Cable Communications to appear and present its
intervention.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 16222 THE
SECRETARY: Please introduce yourself and
you have 10 minutes. Thank you.
INTERVENTION
LISTNUM
1 \l 16223 MS
DINSMORE: Thank you very much.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16224 Good
afternoon, Commissioners and Mr. Chair.
My name is Pam Dinsmore. I am
Vice‑President of Regulatory, Broadband and Video at Rogers
Communications Inc.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16225 With
me today from Rogers Cable Communications is Collette Watson, Vice‑President
responsible for Rogers community channels.
These channels which Rogers operates in Ontario, New Brunswick and
Newfoundland are known collectively as Rogers Television or RTV.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16226 Also
with me is Pierre Fortin, Senior Manager, Production Engineering for Rogers
Television.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16227 Mr.
Chairman, we are here today to voice our opposition to Lee David Weston's
application for a licence to operate a community‑based digital service in
Toronto. Mr. Weston is the first
applicant to come forward with a proposal for a community‑based digital
service since the Commission's community‑based media policy was released
in 2002.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16228 We
have reviewed the application and have found it to be deficient in many
respects.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16229 On
this basis we are quite concerned that the Commission is hearing this
application especially given its precedent‑setting nature. Based on the poor quality of the application,
if it is approved, it will set a very low standard for future applications.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16230 Rogers
does not take issue with the general concept of community‑based digital
media services. We do, however, believe
that the Commission must apply the same rigor in assessing applications for these
types of services as it applies to any other application for a mandatory
digital service. At minimum,
applications for community‑based media services must meet the criteria
for assessment established by the Commission in the 2002 policy.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16231 Mr.
Weston's application does not even meet this minimal criteria or requirement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16232 When
we reviewed Mr. Weston's application we found that his programming proposal and
his business plan were very poorly defined.
The Commission should not even consider approving this application
unless it is satisfied that the proposed service will meet the objectives of
the 2002 policy and will do so based on a sustainable business plan.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16233 In
our view, this application fails on both counts.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16234 In
its 2002 policy the Commission set out specific objectives for community‑based
media services. These services must
provide a high level of locally produced, locally reflective programming that
complements and does not replicate programming offered by over‑the‑air
television stations and the community channel.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16235 The
Commission also set out criteria by which it would assess applications for
community‑based media services.
These criteria are quite specific and include a marketplace assessment,
minimum Canadian content and local programming requirements, expectations of
citizen access and volunteer training and adherence to various industry
broadcast codes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16236 Unfortunately,
it is impossible to assess the merits of Mr. Weston's programming proposal
against the Commission's criteria for assessment. This is largely because he has provided
neither a programming schedule nor any real detail on his programming plans in
his application. Instead, he has merely
offered up a string of promises to broadly address the Commission's 2002 policy
objectives.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16237 Mr.
Weston argues the Commission intended that the programming schedule of
community‑based digital services would be defined by community producers
as they submit their programming. This
would take place once the service was operational.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16238 With
all due respect, this argument defies logic.
How can the Commission assess whether Mr. Weston will broadcast
programming that complements what is offered by conventional and community TV
stations if his program schedule will be determined by community producers at
some point in the future?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16239 Furthermore,
without some form of programming schedule, how can the Commission assess whether
he will meet the Canadian content and local programming requirements for
community‑based digital services?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16240 Beyond
the actual criteria for assessment that were outlined in the 2002 policy,
Rogers believes it is crucial that the Commission also assess the viability of
Mr. Weston's business plan. If his
business plan is not viable, it is unlikely that Mr. Weston would be able to
meet the Commission's objectives over an entire licence term.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16241 We
have examined his business plan and have a number of concerns with it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16242 First
of all, we have issues with his budgets.
His projected advertising and sponsorship revenue assumptions are flawed
and his proposed operating and capital expenses are inadequate and incomplete. Most importantly, based on his correspondence
with Commission staff, Mr. Weston has not demonstrated a full understanding of
the complexity of signal distribution and his obligations in this regard.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16243 Second,
Mr. Weston has filed no evidence to show that community producers support his
proposed service and would be interested in producing programming for it. Instead, he simply assures the Commission
that informal discussions have taken place and there is interest in the
community.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16244 Many
groups and associations that represent independent and community producers are
located in Toronto and could easily have been approached for support. This lack of concrete support is surprising
and raises questions about whether Mr. Weston's programming concept will
work.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16245 Similarly,
Mr. Weston filed no evidence to demonstrate that his proposed service would
appeal to the citizens of Toronto. Not
even one letter of support.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16246 Again,
this lack of demonstrable interest calls into question the viability of his
service.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16247 And
thirdly Mr. Weston and his partners have no experience in operating a
television service nor have they provided any evidence that they will hire or
otherwise acquire such expertise. As we
have already noted, this inexperience is readily apparent in the projected
revenue and expense figures filed with his application.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16248 Given
these concerns, we do not believe Mr. Weston's business plan is viable. As a result, while it is possible he would
launch his service if licensed, we have no confidence that his service would be
sustainable over an entire licence term.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16249 Why
then are we concerned about his service being licensed if we do not think it
would survive its initial licence term?
The answer is easy.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16250 First
of all, it would set the precedent that these services have to meet very
minimal requirements in order to get a licence.
As a result, we could find ourselves having to carry a number of
community‑based digital services across our network.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16251 Second,
Mr. Weston plans to launch his service in 2010 if he is granted a licence. This means that, whether or not his service
is ultimately viable, if it were licensed, we would have to reserve a spot for
it in our spectrum plan.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16252 We
would also have to allocate spectrum to it, once it launches, for as long as it
is operational. This raises capacity
concerns. Capacity is a scarce and
finite resource and always will be.
Rogers carefully manages our spectrum in order to address the
Commission's policy priorities and our customers' programming needs.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16253 Starting
in mid‑2004, we digitized our entire analog lineup to enhance customer
choice and remain competitive. We also
continue to add new services designed to cater to our customers' broad
interests.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16254 We
are fully aware that, over the next five to 10 years, conventional, pay and
specialty programmers will transition to high definition. This will consume additional spectrum.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16255 We
continue to actively work with industry and suppliers to find technological
solutions to meet ongoing capacity demands.
However, the fact remains that there will never be an excess of
capacity.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16256 Given
these capacity demands, we believe any mandatory digital service licensed by
the Commission must meet the basic test of long‑term viability. Simply put, Mr. Weston's proposed service
does not meet this test.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16257 A
much more viable option for Mr. Weston's service might be to deliver it
over the internet. The online
environment is well suited to services that provide niche audiences with hyper‑local
content.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16258 This
would resolve the issue of signal transmission and provide Mr. Weston with a
more streamlined cost structure. It
would also better connect him to his target audience as Internet service has a
higher penetration in our licensed territories than digital cable.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16259 Since
2002, the broadcasting environment has undergone considerable change. The Commission is currently reviewing many of
its policies and licensing frameworks to ensure they align with these changes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16260 In
light of our comments in this proceeding, we believe the 2002 Community‑Based
Media Policy should also be reviewed to ensure that community‑based media
services appropriately contribute to the broadcasting system.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16261 Assessing
the actual viability of a service based on the reasonableness of the business
plan, evidence of demand and experience of the applicant must be a key
consideration.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16262 That
said, Mr. Weston's application does not meet the Commission's existing criteria
for a community‑based digital service and on this basis should be
denied. While his proposed service might
warrant a Category 2 licence, it does not meet the higher standard required of
a mandatory digital service.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16263 Thank
you, Mr. Chairman. This concludes our
remarks and we would be happy to answer any questions you might have.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16264 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Commissioner Cram.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16265 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Okay, and this is all about my
senior moment ‑‑ briefly.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16266 A
mandatory digital service does not mean that we require you to put it on your
digital basic.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16267 MS
DINSMORE: That is correct.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16268 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: I am right.
‑‑‑ Rires /
Laughter
LISTNUM
1 \l 16269 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: So it means it only needs to be
carried as discretionary ‑‑ it is like the other Cat 1's, it
only has the Category 1's, it only has to be offered on a discretionary basis?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16270 MS
DINSMORE: That is exactly our
understanding.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16271 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Perfect. I feel a lot better now. I am not as mixed up as I was.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16272 Now ‑‑
and I am sorry, sir, I forgot your name, Pierre?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16273 MR.
FORTIN: Pierre Fortin.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16274 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: And you are one of those people
with a ring from the erect bridge.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16275 MR.
FORTIN: Actually, no.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16276 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Oh, no?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16277 MR.
FORTIN: I am not an actual engineer.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16278 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Oh! Can you tell me ‑‑ or have
you formed any opinion on the cost that would have to be incurred on any one of
the three options that Mr. Weston believes he could use to transmit a signal to
a BDU head‑end? Have you looked at
that at all?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16279 MR.
FORTIN: We have looked at it. We have had to make broad assumptions because
there is no capital budget in the actual file documents.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16280 But
using conservative assumptions, we estimate for a basic channel running a
digital server would require $50,000‑$75,000 in initial capital, which
could potentially be leased. That is the
equipment portion of it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16281 The
transmission portion of it is where it gets a little difficult because we
estimate a local loop, a connection to Rogers and other BDUs, to cost anywhere
between $1,500 and $2,000 a month approximately. These vary greatly from service provider to
service provider.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16282 If
you start adding up all these costs, with lease payments and all that, and you
look at the technical allocation in the operating budget that was filed, there
doesn't seem to be enough money there to cover all these costs.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16283 There
is an absence of a detailed operating budget, so we don't know how it breaks
down. That is our finding so far.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16284 COMMISSIONER
CRAM: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16285 Thank
you, Mr. Chair.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16286 THE
CHAIRPERSON: To your knowledge, has Mr.
Weston approached anybody at Rogers to review his plan before he filed his
application?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16287 MS
WATSON: If I may, Mr. Weston has
approached us in the past. When the 2002
policy came out, there is a provision for TV corporations if we don't meet our
access floor, they could file and request 20 hours per week, at which point he
made an assumption that we didn't meet our access floor and asked for his 20
hours per week.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16288 It
was clarified for him that we meet and exceed our access floor and while he
doesn't qualify for the 20 hours per week, we would be happy to review his
program proposal.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16289 He
submitted program proposals which were arts and music related for which we
provided our framework, which includes copyright ‑‑ proof of
copyright, ownership and licence fees, and we never heard back from him again.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16290 With
respect to this particular licence, he has not approached us with respect to
programming content or distribution.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16291 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Well, ladies, Monsieur
Fortin, thank you very much for your presentation of this afternoon. We appreciate that you have been here
spending some hours with the Commission.
Thank you very much.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16292 We
will go to Phase III.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16293 MS
DINSMORE: Thank you very much.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16294 THE
SECRETARY: We will now proceed to Phase
III where the applicant may respond to all the interventions that were filed on
these matters.
‑‑‑ Pause
LISTNUM
1 \l 16295 THE
SECRETARY: You have 10 minutes. Thank you.
REPLY / RÉPLIQUE
LISTNUM
1 \l 16296 MR.
WESTON: I don't think that Rogers and I
are ever going to agree on certain aspects of the revenue and expense side of
things. They have basically said that
you won't get that much revenue off this kind of programming, implying that
there should be some other kind of programming we are doing, and your staff is
too small and things like this.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16297 Rogers
has a lot of money to play with and Rogers has said in other cases how much
they expect to spend on independent programming and things like this. They are looking at a larger‑scale
approach than we are.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16298 What
I read in what they are saying is it is a different approach to broadcasting
and I don't think it is an appropriate one for a business that has to pay its
bills, working in Toronto where there is so much local content but not
community expression and self‑expression.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16299 So
I am just going to say I disagree with Rogers and I am sure they disagree with
me on that point.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16300 On
the capacity thing, I find that really ‑‑ I am confused on how
they calculate capacity when they have a community channel which gets twice the
market share that we are projecting and they think that that is good content to
put on a video demand service which would require vastly more resources, and
even in their discussions about the video demand service in their application
they start talking about obsolete concepts of bandwidth limitations and stuff
like that.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16301 So
those would be my two primary comments on Rogers.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16302 I
would also like to take this opportunity to speak slightly to what Bell had to
say and to point out the status of Bell.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16303 It
has made this presentation rather difficult and some of the awkwardness is that
I changed presentations at the last minute to understand your procedures and to
see what is happening with Bell.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16304 Bell,
when they applied for the licence that they say they are going to offer a
community channel for by 2010, wrote "not applicable" on their entire
licence application.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16305 You
have a letter of clarification which is on file from my intervention back then
where they inferred that they were going to rely on independent applications
such as this one.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16306 The
first time one appears they sent in their intervention saying that they in fact
now are going to run a community channel.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16307 So
Bell is sitting on a licence area which is larger than Rogers Toronto, much
larger than what we have, never having explained what their approach is to how
they are going to deal with the very locality issues which they have raised as
a concern.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16308 I
would also point out that their comment that they are going to run a community
channel before 2010, as far as I can tell, is non‑binding. Had they turned up today, they might have
said something to the Commission which would have made it binding.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16309 So
I find it a very strange situation that the person with the largest licence
area for a community channel, the person having public funding, has never
explained anything to do with what they are going to air at all or their approach. The only explanation they have offered in the
past turns out not to be true ‑‑ I shouldn't say not to be
true, it turns out that they are doing something different than they said.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16310 The
final thing I would say about theirs is I don't think that they can launch it
by 2010. If you look at the thing, it is
calculated on your previous years' growth for the BDUs. There's only two years eight months to do it. If you do the math, they will never have the
market share to do it.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16311 So
it is kind of ‑‑ it is a matter of concern that they made a
statement like this and the math looks so wrong and Bell, one would expect,
would have the experience to know that they weren't going to have the market
share.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16312 So
thank you very much.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16313 THE
CHAIRPERSON: I will only say that is
something that we will have to deal with in due time.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16314 So
thank you very much, Mr. Weston. This
ends this phase of your application.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16315 We
will move immediately to the next item.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16316 MR.
WESTON: Thank you.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16317 LA
SECRÉTAIRE : Nous procéderons maintenant à l'examen de l'article 21 à l'ordre
du jour, qui est une demande présentée par Radio Express en vue de renouveler
la licence de l'entreprise de programmation de radio commerciale de langue
française CKOD‑FM Salaberry‑de‑Valleyfield, qui expire le 31
mai 2007.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16318 En
août 2006, le Conseil a décidé de renouveler la licence de la station pour une
période de neuf mois puisque la titulaire n'avait pas respecté plusieurs de ses
obligations.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16319 Le
Conseil a également émis quatre ordonnances exécutoires enjoignant la titulaire
de se conformer au Règlement de 1986 sur la Radio et à sa condition de licence
relative au versement annuel d'une contribution à des organismes tiers voués au
développement des talents canadiens.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16320 Dans
le cadre de cette audience, le Conseil examinera si la titulaire a de nouveau
enfreint l'article 9(2) du Règlement concernant la soumission de son rapport
annuel pour l'année se terminant le 31 août 2006.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16321 Le
Conseil s'attend à ce que la titulaire lui démontre les raisons pour lesquelles
une nouvelle ordonnance exécutoire ne devrait pas être émise pour l'obliger à
se conformer à cette obligation.
AFFIRMATION SOLENNELLE : ROBERT
BRUNET
LISTNUM
1 \l 16322 LA
SECRÉTAIRE : Vous disposez de 20 minutes pour votre présentation.
PRÉSENTATION / PRESENTATION
LISTNUM
1 \l 16323 M.
BRUNET : Alors, bonjour. Mon nom, c'est
Robert Brunet, président de Radio Express inc.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16324 Je
vais être quand même assez bref là.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16325 Quand
on parle d'un autre manquement au délai de dépôt pour le rapport annuel, en
effet, il y a eu un délai additionnel de cinq jours ouvrables. C'est pour ça qu'on peut dire que j'ai
dépassé légèrement. Ça fait que pour
cette partie‑là, je ne peux pas le nier.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16326 Par
contre, pour toutes les autres conditions, nous sommes maintenant à date, et
nous respectons tous nos engagements, et la situation s'est de beaucoup
améliorée depuis la dernière audition en mars de l'année dernière.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16327 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Ça complète votre introduction?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16328 M.
BRUNET : Ça complète, c'est tout ce que j'avais à dire.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16329 LE
PRÉSIDENT : D'accord.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16330 Écoutez,
Monsieur Brunet, je prends acte de ce que vous venez de dire, et, d'ailleurs,
j'ai connaissance, du moins par les notes qui ont été remises, que,
effectivement, les conditions de licence et les ordonnances exécutoires qui
avaient été imposées ont été rencontrées, sauf dans un cas. On aura à en parler dans quelques instants.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16331 Cependant,
je veux quand même profiter de votre présence pour refaire le point sur
l'exploitation de la station au cours des neuf derniers mois.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16332 J'ai
aussi connaissance par les notes qu'on m'a remises du fait que trois membres du
personnel du Conseil sont allés vous rencontrer à Valleyfield et rencontrer
votre personnel et faire un état de la station.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16333 M.
BRUNET : Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16334 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Donc, on a, aujourd'hui, une bien meilleure compréhension de
votre opération.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16335 Les
questions que j'ai, évidemment, découlent en partie de la transcription de
l'année dernière...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16336 M.
BRUNET : Mm‑hmm.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16337 LE
PRÉSIDENT : ...et, effectivement, des ordonnances.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16338 Je
voudrais quand même que vous... ce que je voudrais comprendre, quelles sont les
actions que vous avez posées pour, effectivement, vous assurer que vous
rencontriez les exigences.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16339 Ma
première question tourne autour de la musique vocale française, puis des pièces
canadiennes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16340 Quelle
sorte de système avez‑vous mis en place pour faire en sorte que,
aujourd'hui, vous rencontrez les exigences et quelles sont les assurances qu'on
a que ce système‑là va demeurer?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16341 M.
BRUNET : Bien, premièrement, c'est sûr que, depuis un an, on a changé notre
système de mise en ondes, qui est maintenant le système WiNRADiO. On avait aussi un système plus archaïque dans
le temps là, avec des bobines VHS.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16342 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Mais là, je parle de la préparation du registre musical. On va parler des rubans‑témoins...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16343 M.
BRUNET : Bien, le registre musical, c'est sûr que maintenant, avec le système
WiNRADiO, c'est plus facile. Moi, je ne
travaille pas au jour le jour avec, mais, disons, ma directrice de la
programmation a mis considérablement d'efforts dans ce domaine‑là, et
puis j'ai ici un document qui date du 12 février 2007 qui en témoigne. C'est les derniers rubans‑témoins qu'on
a livrés au CRTC.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16344 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Justement, j'ai des questions là‑dessus.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16345 Effectivement,
le Conseil conclut que vous avez dépassé de manière significative même les
exigences minimales. Cependant... et je
vais prendre juste un exemple.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16346 Ça
me préoccupe parce que, oui, dans le cas de la semaine concernée, qui était du
7 au 13 janvier 2007...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16347 M.
BRUNET : C'est ça.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16348 LE
PRÉSIDENT : ...vous avez rencontré substantiellement les exigences. Là, je regarde, on a du 79 pour cent de
musique francophone, puis du 69 pour cent de musique canadienne.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16349 Cependant,
quand je regarde le rapport préparé par le Conseil, je note que vous avez
réclamé deux pièces que le Conseil vous a dit qu'elles n'étaient pas
canadiennes. Cependant, le Conseil vous
en a crédité 43 de plus. C'est énorme,
et si le hasard avait fait que ces 43 là avaient été des pièces non
canadiennes, bien, vous n'auriez pas rencontré le quota.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16350 Je
comprends que vous avez un système, mais est‑ce que votre système
comprend tout l'ensemble des données ou bien si c'est fait à la mitaine ou...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16351 M.
BRUNET : Bien, le problème qu'on a eu là quand on parle de... c'est que,
justement, c'est un nouveau système qu'on a mis en place, ça fait pas un bon
bout de temps, puis c'est qu'on est encore à l'améliorer, parce que quand on a
acheté le système WiNRADiO, c'était supposé que toutes les pièces musicales qui
étaient incorporées dedans étaient toutes identifiées correctement. C'est ce qu'on s'est aperçu, qu'elles ne
l'étaient pas. C'est pour ça que vous,
vous nous en créditez de plus que notre...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16352 Mais
on est à travailler dessus à toutes les semaines pour le mettre plus exact.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16353 LE
PRÉSIDENT : Mais est‑ce que je peux être en confiance que, pour
l'avenir, à une prochaine écoute, je ne me retrouverai pas avec l'inverse du
résultat que vous avez eu au mois de janvier, et que, finalement, le contraire,
plutôt que d'avoir 65 pour cent de musique vocale française, on se retrouve
avec 32?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16354 M.
BRUNET: C'est certain que ça ne sera pas
l'inverse parce que c'est sûr que depuis tous nos problèmes ou nos discussions
avec le CRTC il y a eu une directive chez nous que ce que je veux là‑dedans
c'est qu'on vise plus le 80 pour cent que notre 55 pour cent dont nous avons
besoin.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16355 C'est
une directive à l'interne qui fait que c'est presque impossible, même à cour
terme...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16356 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Quel mécanisme de contrôle
avez‑vous mis en place pour vous assurer que la directive est suivie?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16357 M.
BRUNET: C'est que maintenant la
directrice de la programmation surveille tout ce qui est musical à toutes les
semaines, sauf que ce qu'on fait, c'est que de plus en plus on révise toutes
les indications qu'il y a pour chaque pièce musicale. Sauf que ça va nous prendre un peu de temps,
mais ce qu'on fait, c'est qu'on vise plus haut temporairement pour être certain
de faire le pourcentage.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16358 LE
PRÉSIDENT: C'est sûr que le Conseil vous
a aidés parce que je regarde, j'ai utilisé seulement une journée avec 43
différences, mais je pense qu'il n'y a pas une journée où il n'y a pas une
quarantaine de pièces d'écart, je ne veux pas exagérer, mais...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16359 Je
prends une journée, vous en aviez 132 vous en aviez rapporté 96, 138 vous en
aviez rapporté 98, 134 vous en aviez rapporté 97, 120 vous en aviez rapporté
85, alors...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16360 M.
BRUNET: Oui, mais par contre c'est qu'on
faisait quand même les quotas avec les pièces qu'on rapportait.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16361 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Ah oui, absolument, de ce
côté‑là, enfin il y a certainement une mesure qui avait été mise en place
à l'effet qu'on en jouait, du français.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16362 Donc,
même si le registre que vous avez préparé ne montrait pas de manière réelle, et
ça on n'a pas de mesure ici, vous n'êtes pas en défaut par rapport à aucun
règlement et à aucune politique, mais je note quand même que c'est un problème
potentiel advenant que dans une autre instance on fasse un autre sondage.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16363 C'est
pour ça que je veux m'assurer que, un, vous m'avez dit que c'était un work in
progress, comme on dit, que donc les données sont archivées et que vous
travaillez à améliorer le système, mais je veux m'assurer, quand est‑ce
que vous pensez que ce sera passablement avancé?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16364 Je
vais dire * passablement avancé + parce que si vous avez été vérifier
le dossier public qu'on avait à l'audience, le renouvellement d'Énergie de
Montréal et de RockDétente Montréal, ils ont eux aussi des écarts.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16365 Donc,
avec tous les moyens qu'ils ont, ils ont aussi... Mais on parle d'un ou deux écarts, vous on
parle de 43.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16366 M.
BRUNET: Oui. Par contre, comme je vous disais plus tôt,
c'est que pour pallier à ces écarts‑là, nous, maintenant, avec ce système‑là,
vu que quand on a acheté les pièces musicales, les informations n'étaient pas
suffisantes ou pas correctement identifiées dans le programme.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16367 Ce
qu'on a mis pour pallier à ça, c'est qu'on vise vraiment plus haut présentement
pour être certain de faire les quotas.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16368 Ce
qui va arriver, c'est que dans les mois à venir, plus on va réajuster les
informations de chaque pièce musicale, plus l'écart va rapetisser, mais on va
être quand même selon les quotas, on va toujours respecter les quotas, sauf
qu'à mesure qu'on va modifier les pièces musicales ou l'information des pièces
musicales, l'écart va rapetisser de plus en plus.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16369 Sauf
que tant que les pièces musicales n'auront pas toutes été modifiées, on va tout
le temps viser plus haut pour être certain de faire le quota.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16370 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Vous êtes‑vous fixé un
échéancier?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16371 M.
BRUNET: Nous, on pense qu'au plus tard à
Noël ça devrait être fait, pour le mois de décembre.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16372 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Noël de 2007.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16373 M.
BRUNET: De cette année. Oui, de 2007.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16374 LE
PRÉSIDENT: De cette année parce qu'il
faut être précis des fois parce que Noël, c'est parce que ça revient...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16375 M.
BRUNET: A chaque année.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16376 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Ça revient à chaque année.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16377 M.
BRUNET: En effet.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16378 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Monsieur, l'année dernière on
avait parlé notamment des contributions de 400 dollars à MUSICACTION. Je notais, en vous lisant la transcription,
que vous aviez, à l'occasion de votre règlement, réglé l'année 2007, du moins
pour 400 dollars.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16379 M.
BRUNET: Exactement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16380 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Or, depuis décembre 2006, la
nouvelle politique pour les stations de votre catégorie, c'est passé à 500.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16381 Est‑ce
qu'on peut s'assurer que d'ici le dépôt de votre prochain rapport annuel
MUSICACTION recevra son autre 100 piastres?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16382 M.
BRUNET: Regardez, présentement
MUSICACTION a eu son 400 dollars daté du 6 février 2007.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16383 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16384 M.
BRUNET: Ce qui représente 80 pour cent
du 500 dollars.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16385 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16386 M.
BRUNET: Ici j'ai un autre chèque daté du
30, qui est quand même seulement qu'hier, pour Les Productions Naïka qui est un
organisme qui collabore au niveau de la chanson régionale.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16387 LE
PRÉSIDENT: D'accord. Parfait.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16388 M.
BRUNET: Ça veut dire que le 500 dollars
pour cette année est déjà versé.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16389 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Et on peut s'assurer que pour
les années subséquentes, selon la formule du Conseil...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16390 M.
BRUNET: Certainement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16391 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Vous maintenez cet engagement‑là
que vous avez d'ailleurs confirmé dans une lettre et je m'assure verbalement
auprès de vous que cette politique, vous continuerez à la suivre.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16392 M.
BRUNET: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16393 C'est
sûr que la politique exige 60 pour cent à MUSICACTION, ce qui veut dire que dès
l'année prochaine on va probablement verser 60 pour cent à MUSICACTION au lieu
de 80 pour cent.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16394 LE
PRÉSIDENT: D'accord.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16395 M.
BRUNET: Et le 40 pour cent additionnel à
des organismes locaux.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16396 LE
PRÉSIDENT: D'accord.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16397 Le
système de rubans‑témoins, effectivement quand on a fait notre analyse
musicale, on n'a pas constaté de défaut sur vos rubans‑témoins et
d'ailleurs en relisant la transcription de l'année dernière, vous disiez que
votre système WinRadio comprenait une composante WinLogger.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16398 M.
BRUNET: Exactement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16399 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Ça fonctionne toujours?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16400 M.
BRUNET: Oui, ça fonctionne très bien.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16401 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Ça fonctionne très bien.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16402 M.
BRUNET: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16403 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Avez‑vous un système de
backup?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16404 M.
BRUNET: Oui. Maintenant on a un ordinateur de plus qui
enregistre, mais c'est un petit peu plus compliqué, lui, c'est comme une boucle
de 20 minutes, c'est plus compliqué à trouver, mais on a quand même le système
d'appoint advenant le cas que le WinLogger ne fonctionnerait pas.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16405 On
a vraiment deux systèmes informatisés différents à deux endroits différents pas
liés un à l'autre.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16406 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Finalement j'arrive à la
production des rapports annuels auprès du Conseil.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16407 Vous
avez déposé votre rapport annuel, vous avez dit...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16408 M.
BRUNET: Je pense que c'est le 4 ou le 5
décembre au lieu du 30 novembre.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16409 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Du 30 novembre.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16410 Parce
que vous n'aviez plus de timbres?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16411 M.
BRUNET: Non. C'est parce qu'on avait visé trop serré et
vous pouvez être assuré que cette année, au lieu de viser le 30, on va viser le
1er.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16412 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Une question que je me suis
posée, votre année financière, c'est le...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16413 M.
BRUNET: Le 31 août.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16414 M.
BRUNET: C'est le 31 août?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16415 M.
BRUNET: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16416 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Parce que l'année dernière,
on a eu une longue discussion concernant l'immatriculation de votre entreprise
et on avait découvert que vous étiez radié.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16417 Là
je me suis dépêché à aller consulter le Registre des entreprises du Québec et
j'ai noté que vous étiez en règle, mais cependant vous aviez déposé votre
déclaration le 10 avril.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16418 Si
ma mémoire est bonne, vous avez six mois après votre année financière, donc
vous étiez dix jours en retard.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16419 Est‑ce
que vous avez toujours des problèmes comme ça avec les rapports annuels?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16420 M.
BRUNET: Dans le temps, oui, mais ça on
parle de voilà un an.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16421 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Non, non, je parle du 10
avril 2007.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16422 M.
BRUNET: Vous parlez pour les états de la
compagnie?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16423 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Oui, oui, auprès du
registraire des entreprises.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16424 M.
BRUNET: Oui, c'est sûr que cette partie‑là
a traîné légèrement, mais par contre maintenant on est à date.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16425 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Oui. Je vois que vous êtes à date, le registraire
dit que la déclaration annuelle il l'a reçue, mais il l'a reçue, déclare‑t‑il,
le 10 avril 2007, mais de mémoire, je crois que la Loi des compagnies dit que
vous avez six mois, donc ça veut dire que vous étiez dix jours en retard.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16426 M.
BRUNET: Oui, on était en retard, mais
avant c'était pire.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16427 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Oui, oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16428 M.
BRUNET: On s'est de beaucoup amélioré.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16429 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Oui, effectivement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16430 M.
BRUNET: Dans un an.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16431 LE
PRÉSIDENT: C'est parce qu'on dirait
que... parce qu'on voit bien que par le dossier on transige avec votre
directrice des programmes pour certains éléments, on a eu affaire avec monsieur
Nevins pour d'autres aspects, mais quand ce sont des aspects qui sont purement
Pierre Brunet, que le personnel ne peut pas s'en occuper, ça prend plus de
temps.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16432 M.
BRUNET: Oui, mais ça c'était dans le
passé.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16433 Depuis
décembre cette année, il n'y a presque plus de retards maintenant. Il y a eu vraiment une grosse amélioration.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16434 LE
PRÉSIDENT: L'année dernière on avait
fait le tour de certaines situations délicates, notamment des redevances à
SOCAN, vous nous aviez parlé d'un plan d'étalement, êtes‑vous toujours à
l'intérieur de votre plan d'étalement?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16435 M.
BRUNET: Dans cette portion‑là, on
avait des ententes avec eux, il reste une partie à négocier avec eux.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16436 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Il reste une partie à
négocier.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16437 M.
BRUNET: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16438 LE
PRÉSIDENT: C'est donc qu'il y a
encore...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16439 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Combien, monsieur Brunet?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16440 M.
BRUNET: Je ne pourrais pas vous dire
exactement le chiffre exact, mais il faut qu'on négocie, c'est la dernière
chose qu'il nous reste à négocier maintenant.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16441 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: C'était 80 000 en mars
dernier, là c'est une chose significative.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16442 Vous
nous dites que vous avez fait des paiements entre‑temps et qu'il reste
une balance à régler?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16443 M.
BRUNET: Oui, oui, oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16444 On
n'a pas fait de paiement depuis ce temps‑là, il faut qu'on le règle avec
la SOCAN, justement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16445 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Vous n'avez fait aucun paiement
sur votre 80 000.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16446 M.
BRUNET: Non, pas sur le montant dû.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16447 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Alors, on doit présumer que ça
va être 80 000 plus quelque chose additionnel.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16448 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Et plus cette année?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16449 M.
BRUNET: Plus les ententes, c'est ça, il
s'agit de prendre une entente avec eux.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16450 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Alors, vous n'avez pas eu
d'entente.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16451 M.
BRUNET: Non.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16452 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Vous nous avez assurés d'avoir
une entente la dernière fois qu'on s'est vus et it turns out que vous n'avez
pas d'entente.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16453 M.
BRUNET: Pas avec la SOCAN pour...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16454 Attendez
une minute. Oui j'ai une entente avec
eux, j'ai une entente avec eux, mais par contre la SOCAN, il y a une clause qui
dit que quand l'entente ne fonctionne pas, il faut qu'ils me notifient et
justement il faut qu'on se parle pour ce dossier‑là. Parce que je n'ai pas eu la notification de
la SOCAN.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16455 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Ça veut dire que le plan que
vous aviez négocié avec eux, pour eux ils s'attendent à ce que vous le
respectiez.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16456 M.
BRUNET: Oui. Sûrement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16457 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Donc, ils n'ont pas besoin de
vous revenir.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16458 M.
BRUNET: Bien, on a une entente avec eux
que si le plan n'est pas respecté, eux il faut qu'ils me notifient.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16459 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Ah, et ils peuvent exiger le
paiement complet.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16460 M.
BRUNET: Non. Il faut qu'ils me notifient 30 jours avant,
il faut qu'ils me notifient et moi j'ai 30 jours pour...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16461 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Apporter une correction.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16462 M.
BRUNET: Apporter une correction.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16463 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Corriger le défaut.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16464 M.
BRUNET: C'est ça. Je n'ai pas encore de notification de la
SOCAN. C'est sûr que vous allez me
dire on a étiré l'élastique avec eux aussi un peu, par contre présentement
je ne suis pas en défaut.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16465 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Donc, s'ils ne vous ont pas
notifié, vous en concluez...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16466 Ma
question ce n'est pas est‑ce que la SOCAN vous a notifié que vous étiez
en défaut. Ma question c'est faites‑vous
vos...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16467 M.
BRUNET: Présentement non.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16468 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Rencontrez‑vous vos
engagements avec la SOCAN?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16469 M.
BRUNET: Présentement, non.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16470 LE
PRÉSIDENT: On peut savoir pourquoi?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16471 M.
BRUNET: C'est parce qu'on a réglé pas
mal de choses dans l'année 2006, j'ai réinvesti 220 000 dollars dans la
compagnie, d'argent personnel, disons, là c'est le dernier... comment on
pourrait appeler ça, le dernier bloc à régler c'est le bloc de la SOCAN.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16472 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Vous nous dites que vous n'avez
pas d'autres dettes significatives mis à part le financement de base de la
compagnie, sauf votre dette envers la SOCAN.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16473 M.
BRUNET: Non. J'ai une entente avec le gouvernement
provincial aussi.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16474 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Est‑ce que vous la
respectez l'entente avec le gouvernement provincial?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16475 M.
BRUNET: Oui. Certainement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16476 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Quel est le montant que vous
devez au moment où on se parle à la SOCAN?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16477 M.
BRUNET: Aujourd'hui, présentement, je ne
pourrais pas vous dire le montant, je ne pensais pas avoir cette question‑là
aujourd'hui, mais je peux le faire calculer et vous revenir là‑dessus.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16478 LE
PRÉSIDENT: On apprécierait que vous le
déposiez par écrit.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16479 M.
BRUNET: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16480 LE
PRÉSIDENT: On peut vous donner une
semaine pour nous faire parvenir la réponse.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16481 M.
BRUNET: Pas de problème.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16482 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Au début de la semaine
prochaine.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16483 M.
BRUNET: C'est beau. Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16484 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Mais respectant le délai,
pas...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16485 Me
LAGACÉ: Disons lundi, Monsieur le
Président?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16486 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Pas les délais de Robert
Brunet. Le délai qu'on vous donne.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16487 Me
LAGACÉ: On peut s'entendre pour lundi,
est‑ce que vous êtes en mesure de le produire pour lundi de la semaine
prochaine?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16488 Ça
vous donne trois jours ouvrables.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16489 M.
BRUNET: On pourrait s'entendre pour
mercredi, peut‑être?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16490 LE
PRÉSIDENT: D'accord.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16491 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Cependant si ce n'est pas là,
monsieur Brunet, vous allez comprendre quel type de réaction on va avoir.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16492 M.
BRUNET: Oui, oui. Oui, c'est certain.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16493 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Outre Revenu Québec et la
SOCAN, le reste des comptes payables sont au courant.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16494 M.
BRUNET: Oui, oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16495 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Oui. A l'intérieur de 90 jours, admettons.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16496 M.
BRUNET: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16497 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Quand vous avez comparu
l'année dernière, vous nous aviez fait part que vous aviez formé un comité de
gestion qui comprenait certaines personnes dont monsieur Gadoua.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16498 Dans
la discussion, évidemment vous avez dit... parce que je me souviens très bien,
vous nous aviez déposé un document qui disait quelles étaient les fonctions du
comité de gestion et quand on a discuté au fond, vous avez repris certains des
propos qui avaient été écrits sur ce document‑là.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16499 Est‑ce
que vous avez formé votre comité de gestion?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16500 M.
BRUNET: Oui. On l'a formé, il a été en fonction environ un
an, il a été dissout à la fin du mois de mars cette année.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16501 LE
PRÉSIDENT: On peut savoir pourquoi il a
été dissout?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16502 M.
BRUNET: C'est parce que le comité, dans
le fond, ce n'était pas un vrai comité de gestion selon vos termes à vous,
c'était plus comme un comité de coaching pour m'aider à rentrer dans les délais
et remettre mes rapports à temps.
C'était plus un comité d'aide.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16503 Sur
une période d'un an, je pense que je me suis pas mal amélioré et c'est pour ça
que là le comité a été dissout.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16504 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Le 31 mars 2007 que vous
l'avez dissout?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16505 M.
BRUNET: Oui, à la fin du mois de mars.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16506 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Parce que là vous êtes
confiant que vous êtes capable de rencontrer les délais?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16507 M.
BRUNET: Exactement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16508 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Pourtant, au mois de
novembre, même avec le comité de gestion, vous n'avez pas rencontré le délai.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16509 M.
BRUNET: C'est ça, on a dépassé de cinq
jours. Exactement. C'est vraiment qu'on avait visé trop juste
comme je disais précédemment, on a visé le 30 ce qui n'était pas une bonne
chose. C'est pour ça que cette année on
va viser le 1er.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16510 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Monsieur Brunet, l'année
dernière on vous avait imposé des conditions par ordonnance judiciaire
exécutoire.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16511 Pouvez‑vous
nous dire pourquoi le Conseil ne devrait pas réémettre ces ordonnances
judiciaires?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16512 M.
BRUNET: Je ne pense pas qu'il devrait y
avoir d'ordonnance parce qu'on a quand même assez bien réajusté tout ce qui
était à l'interne à la station.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16513 Par
contre, si vous en voyez absolument la nécessité, je ne m'y opposerai pas.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16514 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Normalement dans sa loi le
Conseil peut émettre des renouvellements de licence pour une durée maximale de
sept ans.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16515 Avez‑vous
des motifs à donner au Conseil pourquoi le Conseil devrait vous donner un
renouvellement de sept ans?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16516 M.
BRUNET: Parce que je pense que vraiment,
considérant le dossier où on était l'an passé et où on est rendu aujourd'hui,
je pense qu'il y a eu une nette amélioration et je ne pense pas qu'on
mériterait d'avoir un renouvellement plus court.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16517 Là
ça sera à votre convenance d'en décider, mais selon moi il y a eu une nette
amélioration si on prend le portrait de voilà un an et le portrait aujourd'hui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16518 C'est
sûr, comme on parlait tout à l'heure, tout n'est pas rendu tout beau, tout 100
pour cent parfait, en tout cas je sais que monsieur French était là l'année
passée et quand on se parlait, ce n'était vraiment pas le même portrait
qu'aujourd'hui, on était vraiment plus en défaut et il y avait vraiment plus
de...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16519 En
tout cas, c'était plus à l'envers, disons, voilà un an que ça l'est
aujourd'hui, je pense qu'on a vraiment fait un bon bout de chemin.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16520 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Avez‑vous d'autres
entreprises que la station de radio?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16521 M.
BRUNET: Présentement non.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16522 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Monsieur Brunet, si le Président
me permet, pouvez‑vous nous dire un petit peu ce qui a changé dans votre
comportement personnel qui vous donne la confiance que vous nous exprimez?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16523 Parce
que nous, on veut y croire, mais le problème c'est que vous nous avez fait des
engagements un peu beaucoup et des fois ce n'est pas très reluisant, le
résultat.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16524 Je
ne nie pas que vous avez une amélioration, mais j'aimerais comprendre dans vos
mots et d'après vous, qu'est‑ce qui a changé dans votre participation
dans la vie de l'entreprise ou dans votre vie personnelle en général qui
devrait nous amener à avoir plus de confiance?
1620
LISTNUM
1 \l 16525 M.
BRUNET: Je pense que ça fait huit ans
que je suis propriétaire. Depuis ce
temps‑là il y a eu beaucoup de choses.
A la station on a eu des hauts et des bas, il y a eu différentes choses,
différents intervenants qui ont voulu se partir d'autres radios. Il y a eu différentes situations au niveau du
personnel. Il y a eu différentes
situations au niveau...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16526 Il
y a eu certaines années que de ma part il y a peut‑être eu un certain
découragement, ce qui a fait que, ultimement, je parle voilà un an, un an et
demi environ, il y avait plusieurs choses qui étaient à l'envers au niveau de
la gestion.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16527 Par
contre, avec l'aide de plusieurs personnes dont le personnel de la station, je
pense qu'on a remis nos culottes et on a travaillé fort.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16528 On
peut voir dès cette année qu'il y a déjà eu un gros changement depuis l'année
passée.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16529 Ce
que je pourrais dire, c'est que la pire période a fini l'année passée qui a été
une accumulation de différentes étapes ou différents événements, sauf que
depuis un an il y a beaucoup beaucoup de choses qui se sont placées et je pense
que l'équipe à l'intérieur et moi inclus, ça nous a encouragés et ça nous a
donné plus l'espoir et la force de travailler pour ramener toutes nos
obligations à date.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16530 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Combien d'heures passez‑vous
à la station par semaine?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16531 M.
BRUNET: Présentement? Peut‑être une trentaine d'heures.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16532 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: C'est parce que des fois on
essaie de vous trouver et non seulement vous n'êtes pas à la station, on ne
sait pas où vous êtes, pour des semaines et des semaines.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16533 M.
BRUNET: Attendez, vous parlez de quand?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16534 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: L'année dernière quand on a
voulu vous parler.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16535 M.
BRUNET: L'année dernière, vous avez
raison, mais l'année dernière je n'étais pas toujours là à toutes les semaines
30 heures/semaine.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16536 L'année
dernière il est arrivé plusieurs semaines que par découragement ou autre
j'étais moins présent.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16537 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: N'est‑il pas vrai que ce
n'était pas la déception ou le découragement, mais c'était plutôt de la
distraction de votre part?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16538 M.
BRUNET: Distraction?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16539 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Oui, vous étiez diverti dans
d'autres activités.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16540 M.
BRUNET: Non, pas vraiment.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16541 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Non.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16542 M.
BRUNET: Non.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16543 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: C'était honnêtement que vous
vous êtes découragé, vous êtes allé chez vous et vous vous êtes dit : * Je n'y peux rien + ou...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16544 M.
BRUNET: Pas découragé, mais appelez ça
genre découragement genre burnout, genre...
Plus une situation comme ça que d'aller vers d'autres activités ou
d'autres commerces. Non.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16545 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Nous, essentiellement, on
fait allusion à la période... et le dernier renouvellement. On ne parle pas au moment où vous avez
comparu l'année dernière, mais à partir du moment où on a effectivement
renouvelé la licence en août 2006, donc du 1er septembre 2006 à aujourd'hui,
vous avez eu des périodes de découragement?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16546 M.
BRUNET: Bien, disons jusqu'au mois de
décembre, il y a eu...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16547 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Parce que je sais que quand
vous nous avez laissés l'année dernière, le lendemain vous vous en alliez
repartir l'entreprise, rouvrir le compte de banque, redonner, donc, une phloux
à l'entreprise.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16548 M.
BRUNET: C'est ce qui a été fait aussi.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16549 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Ah oui, c'est marqué dans le
Registre des compagnies et les dates concordent.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16550 Ce
que je veux dire par là, mon interrogation c'est que, effectivement, depuis
cette période‑là, ça semble aller mieux, en tout cas l'apparence du
dossier semble aller mieux, mais vous me dites que vous avez quand même eu des
périodes de découragement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16551 M.
BRUNET: Ce que je dis, c'est que c'est à
la fin des périodes de découragement parce qu'on était rendu à l'ultime à cette
période‑là, il fallait rouvrir un compte de banque, il a fallu régler la
marge de crédit, on a rencontré plusieurs exigences financières.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16552 C'est
sûr que ça a été un stress intense et une période quand même assez difficile.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16553 Ce
que je vous dis, c'est que depuis là, depuis, admettons, le mois de décembre,
janvier, il y a eu beaucoup de changements parce que là plusieurs de ces stress
financiers là ont été enlevés et tranquillement c'est sûr que ça va mieux.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16554 Quand
vous n'avez pas besoin de penser à ces stress‑là quotidiennement, c'est
sûr que ça aide aussi au point de vue moral.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16555 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Depuis le mois d'avril
dernier, avez‑vous été obligé de réinvestir dans la compagnie?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16556 M.
BRUNET: Sauf des petits montants, non.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16557 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Donc aujourd'hui elle fait
ses frais.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16558 M.
BRUNET: Présentement elle est sur le
bord de faire ses frais.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16559 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Elle est sur le bord de faire
ses frais.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16560 M.
BRUNET: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16561 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Ce n'est pas dramatique.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16562 M.
BRUNET: C'est ça. Mais il y a encore une couple de
petits... C'est comme je vous dis, des
fois il y a des petits montants qu'il faut réinjecter pour ne pas avoir de
problèmes comme on a eus voilà un an.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16563 Sauf
qu'il y a différentes choses qui se sont stabilisées. La plupart des choses se sont stabilisées.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16564 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Pour ce qui est des
investissements techniques, il n'y en a plus à faire.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16565 M.
BRUNET: Présentement non. On est pas mal tout updaté, upgradé.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16566 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Avec Revenu Canada et Revenu
Québec, on a une entente avec Revenu Québec, mais on paie de façon courante.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16567 M.
BRUNET: C'est ça, on avait une entente
Revenu Canada qui a fini au mois de février.
Eux on ne leur doit plus rien.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16568 Là
maintenant on a une entente avec Revenu Québec sur une période de trois ans.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16569 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Alors il reste la SOCAN.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16570 M.
BRUNET: Il reste la SOCAN, c'est le
dernier.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16571 M.
BRUNET: Vous respectez votre engagement
par rapport à la SOCAN.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16572 M.
BRUNET: Sauf avec la SOCAN parce que
c'est justement, il y avait des étapes, entre autres il fallait finir avec le
gouvernement fédéral, ça a été rencontré.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16573 C'est
parce que quelque part là‑dedans, c'est qu'on s'est financé à l'interne
et personnellement, ce que ça a fait c'est que le gouvernement fédéral est
réglé, on a une entente de trois ans avec le gouvernement provincial.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16574 C'est
sûr et certain que pour la SOCAN, on attendait un peu, on se disait : * Plus on a de jeu pour tout de
suite, ça nous aide. +
LISTNUM
1 \l 16575 LE
PRÉSIDENT: En d'autres mots, ce que vous
me dites : * Je suis en défaut avec la
SOCAN, mais comme je n'ai pas reçu l'avis de 30 jours, je me finance avec
eux. +
LISTNUM
1 \l 16576 M.
BRUNET: Je ne me finance pas avec eux,
mais j'attendais que...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16577 En
partie, c'est un peu en partie ça parce qu'on attendait de clairer les autres
qui eux étaient des organismes qui pouvaient nous faire fermer et à ce moment‑là
si je fermais, je perdais ma licence, et caetera, et caetera.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16578 C'est
sûr que c'est l'organisme qu'on a le plus étiré, mais c'est le dernier qui nous
reste avec le gouvernement du Québec.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16579 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Vous êtes conscient que la
SOCAN, c'est une licence mensuelle, donc à chaque mois...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16580 M.
BRUNET: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16581 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Les payez‑vous quand
même au courant?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16582 M.
BRUNET: Non, présentement non. Le trois point deux pour cent, non.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16583 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Qu'est‑ce que vous
faites aussi avec les autres sociétés de droits d'auteur, celle pour les droits
voisins, les droits de reproduction?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16584 M.
BRUNET: Les autres c'est fait.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16585 LE
PRÉSIDENT: C'est fait.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16586 M.
BRUNET: Eux sont faits.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16587 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Que ça soit la CSI qui est la
CMRRA/SODRAC.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16588 M.
BRUNET: Attendez. Là‑dedans il y a la SODRAC, justement,
il y a une madame... on est en pourparlers avec une madame...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16589 J'ai
un document ici du 4 janvier avec madame Natasha Labelle. C'est l'autre document qu'on est en
pourparlers avec eux. Mais ce ne sont
pas des...
LISTNUM
1 \l 16590 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Ce sont des sommes moins
importantes.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16591 M.
BRUNET: Oui, oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16592 LE
PRÉSIDENT: De quel ordre?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16593 M.
BRUNET: Ça je ne pourrais pas vous dire.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16594 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Non. Pouvez‑vous le mettre dans la lettre?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16595 M.
BRUNET: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16596 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Écoutez, monsieur Brunet, on
prend acte des réponses que vous nous avez données et on apprécie que vous
soyez venu ici.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16597 Je
ne sais pas si vous avez quelque chose d'autre à ajouter.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16598 M.
BRUNET: Non, c'est tout.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16599 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Avant de conclure, je sais
que vous avez reçu une intervention de l'ADISQ et si vous voulez répliquer à
leur intervention, ce serait le moment de le faire.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16600 M.
BRUNET: La seule chose, c'est que
l'ADISQ a répété l'article qui disait qu'il appert que notre dossier est en
retard. J'ai répondu à cette question‑là.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16601 Après,
quand ils demandent si on se fie ou si on rencontre les normes ou les critères
de musique canadienne et de langue francophone, comme vous l'avez vu dans le
dernier rapport, on les atteint et largement, on les dépasse largement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16602 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Vous avez répondu à l'ADISQ
par écrit?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16603 M.
BRUNET: Non. Moi je n'ai pas répondu.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16604 Je
veux dire un peu plus tôt quand je vous ai répondu.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16605 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Oui, oui, d'accord.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16606 M.
BRUNET: A vous.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16607 LE
PRÉSIDENT: A cette portion.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16608 M.
BRUNET: A l'ADISQ on n'a pas répondu.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16609 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Donc, ça constitue votre
réponse à l'ADISQ à l'effet que vos engagements en matière de soutien au CCD ou
à l'ancien CTD, tout comme vos obligations face au contenu canadien et la
musique francophone, votre réplique à l'ADISQ c'est que c'est fait.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16610 M.
BRUNET: Sauf qu'on négocie avec la
SODRAC présentement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16611 Mais
le restant, pour ce qui est contenu canadien et musique francophone, on dépasse
largement.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16612 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Le mémoire de l'ADISQ ne
parlait pas de la SODRAC.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16613 M.
BRUNET: C'est ça parce qu'eux,
normalement, c'est 35 pour cent le contenu canadien, nous, on est à 60, 70 pour
cent, je pense qu'on dépasse de beaucoup.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16614 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Oui.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16615 Monsieur
Brunet, ça complète notre questionnement et nous vous remercions d'être venu à
l'audience.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16616 M.
BRUNET: Merci beaucoup.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16617 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Ceci conclut l'audience,
Madame la Secrétaire, je présume?
LISTNUM
1 \l 16618 LA
SECRÉTAIRE: Oui. Merci, Monsieur le Président.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16619 Je
voulais juste mentionner qu'International Harvesters ont soumis leur engagement
et qu'aux fins du dossier, les intervenants qui n'ont pas comparu et qui
étaient indiqués dans l'ordre du jour demeureront dans le dossier public comme
des interventions sans comparution.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16620 Merci
Monsieur le Président.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16621 LE
PRÉSIDENT: Merci à tous les
participants. Merci au personnel du
Conseil. Merci chers collègues.
LISTNUM
1 \l 16622 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Merci aux membres de l'équipe B.
‑‑‑ Rires /
Laughters
LISTNUM
1 \l 16623 CONSEILLER
FRENCH: Et les Commissaires, bien sûr.
‑‑‑ L'audience
s'est terminée à 1631 /
Whereupon the hearing concluded at 1631
REPORTERS
_____________________ _____________________
Johanne Morin Monique Mahoney
_____________________ _____________________
Fiona Potvin Jean Desaulniers
- Date de modification :