Communications Monitoring Report 2018
Broadcasting distribution sector
Infographic 10.1
Long Description
2017 | 2016-2017 Growth (%) | |
---|---|---|
BDU subscribers | 10.7M | -1.9 |
BDU revenues | $8.5B | -2.3 |
BDU EBITDA margin | 18.3% | N/A |
Total BDU contribution to Canadian programming | $412M | -3.7 |
Total affiliation payments reported by BDUs | $3.5B | 0.7 |
Total affiliation payments to Canadian services | $3.1B | 1.6 |
Percentage of households subscribing to BDUs | 72.3% | N/A |
Affiliation payments refer to the remuneration that providers of discretionary and on-demand programming services (Canadian and non-Canadian) receive from the BDUs distributing their services.
Broadcasting distribution undertakings (BDUs) provide subscription television services to Canadians. They distribute conventional television, discretionary and on-demand services. The broadcasting distribution section of this report focuses on three types of BDUs: cable, Internet protocol television (IPTV) and national direct-to-home (DTH) satellite service providers.
In 2017, BDU revenuesFootnote 1 stood at $8.5 billion and represented almost half of total broadcasting revenues. While revenues were down 2.3% compared to 2016, BDUs reported a combined earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) margin of 18.3% in 2017. They also contributed over $400 million to the creation and production of the Canadian programming, in addition to making over $3.1 billion in affiliation payments to Canadian television services as a result of delivering programming to almost 11 million subscribers or 72.3% of Canadian households.
i. Revenues and financial performance
Infographic 10.2
Long Description
Indicator | Cable | IPTV | DTH | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017 revenues ($ million) | 4,593 | 1,985 | 1,959 | 8,538 |
2016-2017 revenue growth (%) | -4.1 | 10.3 | -8.9 | -2.3 |
2017 subscribers (million) | 6.1 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 10.7 |
2016-2017 subscriber growth (%) | -2.9 | 5.5 | -7.2 | -1.9 |
2017 average revenues by subscriber ($/month) | 62.32 | 65.24 | 76.76 | 65.85 |
2017 EBITDA margin (%) | 18.6 | 7.7 | 28.1 | 18.3 |
National direct-to-home (DTH) refers to satellite service providers, while IPTV refers to Internet protocol television, such as Bell Fibe and Telus Optik TV, but excludes Internet-based services, such as Netflix, Crave and Club Illico.
Monthly revenues per subscriber are calculated by dividing BDUs’ annual revenues from basic and non-basic services by the average number of subscriptions in the year. The result is then divided by 12 to obtain the monthly amount. The average number of subscribers is determined by dividing by two the sum of the number of subscribers at the beginning and at the end of the year.
The EBITDA margin is a metric used to measure financial performance; it represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and is expressed as a percentage of total revenues.
As previously stated, 2017 revenues of Canadian cable, IPTV and satellite companies stood at $8,538 million, a 2.3% decrease from the previous year, marking a third consecutive year of declining revenues. For the first time, BDU revenues displayed a decline in its average five-year CAGR. Revenues declined 0.7% per year on average from 2013 to 2017.
Revenues of IPTV services continued on their upward trend and totalled $1,985 million in 2017, surpassing for the first time DTH revenues, as well as reporting for the first time a positive EBITDA margin (7.7%). DTH services, however, still remain the most profitable of the three types of services, reporting a 28.1% EBITDA margin. DTH services also generated a higher average monthly revenue per subscriber ($76.76/month) than the other services, surpassing cable and IPTV services by over $10/month.
Taken together, cable, IPTV and DTH services provided services to which 72.3% of Canadian households subscribed. Although BDU penetration has been in decline in the recent years, Canadians don’t seem to be necessarily replacing the service by its online counterpart. While BDU penetration shrank from 81.5% to 72.3% of Canadian households between 2013 and 2017, the percentage of Canadians who reported watching television exclusively online only went up from 6% to 9% over the same period.
Scroll
Source: CRTC data collection and Media Technology Monitor (MTM), 2013-2017 (Respondents: Canadians 18+), Statistics Canada census dataView data
Watching television exclusively online refers to those who do not watch live TV at home and choose to watch television exclusively online via various streaming websites and services. A small percentage of these might still have a traditional paid TV subscription or receive over-the-air broadcast signals, yet they do not use them, opting instead for online services for their television viewing.
In 2017, traditional television still reached 95% of Canadians, while Internet television reached 61% of Canadians. Although 61% of Canadians watched some television content online, only 9% of Canadians watched television exclusively online. Most Canadians watching television exclusively online were Anglophones and tended to be in the 18-34 age group.
In 2017, 10% of English-speaking Canadians and 6% of French-speaking Canadians watched television content exclusively online. Younger Canadians are more likely to watch television exclusively online than older Canadians. Specifically, in the same year, 18% of Canadians in the 18-34 age group reported watching television exclusively online, while only 12% of the 35-49 age group, 5% the 50-65 age group and 1% of the 65+ age group reported doing so.
Scroll
Source: Media Technology Monitor (MTM), 2013-2017 (Respondents: Canadians 18+)View data
Scroll
Source: Media Technology Monitor (MTM), 2013-2017 (Respondents: Canadians 18+)View data
ii. Industry characteristics
Infographic 10.3
As in the case of the overall broadcasting industry, the majority of the BDU sector’s revenues are generated by a few large entities. In 2017, the top six groups/entities reported 94% of the total BDU revenues, as well as accounting for 96% of BDU subscribers.
While IPTV is still growing in terms of subscribers and revenue and achieved a positive EBITDA for the first time in 2017, cable services still represented over half of the BDU market, comprising 54% of the total BDU revenues and 57% of subscribers.
Scroll
Source: CRTC data collectionView data
Scroll
Source: CRTC data collectionView data
iii. Contributions
Cable, IPTV and satellite companies are required to contribute at least 5% of their annual broadcast-related revenues to the creation and production of Canadian programming. This can take the form of contributions to various Certified Independent Production Funds (CIPFs), the Canada Media Fund (CMF) or local expression, which includes the creation and distribution of community programming. Further, in 2009, the Commission established an additional fund, the Local Programming Improvement Fund (LPIF), in an effort to support local programming by conventional television stations during a difficult financial period. From 2010 to 2014, LPIF contributions made by BDUs averaged $87 million per year. On 1 September 2014, the LPIF was discontinued.
Contributions to the creation and production of Canadian programming by cable, IPTV and satellite companies totalled $412 million in 2017, a 3.7% decrease relative to 2016. From 2013 to 2017, contributions decreased by 4.4% on average per year.
In 2017, approximately half of the BDU contributions to Canadian programming went to the CMF ($206M), followed by local expression (36% or $149M) and independent funds (14% or $58M).
Scroll
Source: CRTC data collectionView data
This figure shows the contributions made by BDUs to the CMF, the LPIF and independent production funds, as well as spending on local expression, during the 12-month period ending 31 August of each year. BDU contributions include contributions reported by cable BDUs and DTH satellite services. Note: the LPIF was discontinued on 1 September 2014.
iv. Affiliation payments
The providers of discretionary and on-demand programming servicesFootnote 2 (Canadian and non-Canadian) receive remuneration from the BDUs distributing their services. This remuneration is referred to as an affiliation payment and is based on the number of BDU subscribers who receive the programming service.
Payments to Canadian affiliates increased by 3.1% on average per year from 2013 to 2017, whereas payments to non-Canadian affiliates increased by 2.6% on average per year over the same period. Altogether, in 2017, $3,504 million in affiliation payments were made to all affiliates.
In line with revenues, cable services made the majority (53%) of the affiliation payments to discretionary and on-demand services in 2017, followed by IPTV and DTH services. Affiliation payments made to Canadian services exceeded $3 billion, over seven times more than the amount ($420M) paid to non-Canadian services.
Scroll
Source: CRTC data collectionView data
($ million) | Percentage (%) | |
---|---|---|
DTH | $730 | 21% |
IPTV | $905 | 26% |
Cable | $1,869 | 53% |
Scroll
Source: CRTC data collectionView data
($ million) | Percentage (%) | |
---|---|---|
Canadian affiliates | $3,084 | 12% |
Non-Canadian affiliates | $420 | 88% |
The data is based on the 12-month period ending 31 March of each year.
v. Dispute resolution
Dispute resolution is designed to effectively assist parties in reaching mutually beneficial agreements and resolve disputes in an increasingly competitive broadcasting industry. The process and procedures used for resolving disputes that come under the Commission’s regulatory purview are set out in Practices and procedures for staff-assisted mediation, final offer arbitration and expedited hearings, Broadcasting and Telecom Information Bulletin CRTC 2013-637, 28 November 2013.
Disputes can be generally classified as follows: (1) disputes between broadcasting distributors and programming services concerning the terms of distribution, (2) disputes between competing broadcasting distributors over access to buildings and the end-user and (3) disputes between programmers regarding programming rights and markets served.
In 2017, a total of 332 cases were brought forward: 95% were informal disputes, while 5% were formal disputes. Among the formal disputes, only two went to final offer arbitration.
Scroll
Source: CRTC data collectionView data
Number of dispute resolution cases | Percentage (%) | |
---|---|---|
Formal | 17 | 5% |
Informal | 315 | 95% |
Scroll
Source: CRTC data collectionView data
Number of dispute resolution cases | Percentage (%) | |
---|---|---|
Staff-assisted mediation | 15 | 12% |
Final offer arbitration | 2 | 88% |
The data is based on the 12-month period ending 31 March of each year.
Contents of the Report
- Communications Services in Canadian Households: Subscriptions and Expenditures 2012-2016
- Communications Services Pricing in Canada
- Communications Industry Overview: Telecommunications and Broadcasting
- Telecommunications Overview
- Retail Fixed Internet Sector and Broadband Availability
- Retail Mobile Sector
- Broadcasting Overview
- Radio Sector
- Television Sector
- Broadcasting Distribution Sector
Go directly to:
Report Section | Open Data |
---|---|
Communications Services in Canadian Households: Subscriptions and Expenditures 2012-2016 | Households data |
Communications Services Pricing in Canada | Pricing data |
Communications Industry Overview: Telecommunications and Broadcasting | Industry overview data |
Telecommunications Overview | Telecommunications Overview data |
Retail Fixed Internet Sector and Broadband Availability | Internet data |
Retail Mobile Sector | Mobile data |
Broadcasting Overview | Broadcasting Data |
Radio Sector | |
Television Sector | |
Broadcasting Distribution |
- Date modified: