ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 20 May 2010
Our Reference: 8644-A89-201008384
c/o Mark Lewis
Lewis Birnberg Hanet, LLP
693 Queen Street East
Toronto, ON M4M 1G6
H&R Property Management Ltd and 160 Elgin Portfolio Inc.
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
c/o Bram Abramson
Box 48, Suite 5300
Toronto Dominion Bank Tower
Toronto, ON M5K1E6
Dear Mr. Lewis and Mr. Abramson:
Re: Atria Networks LP - Application to access the multi-dwelling unit at
160 Elgin Street, Ottawa, ON
On 13 May 2010, Atria Networks LP (Atria) filed a Part VII application with the Commission, pursuant to the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, requesting access to the multi-dwelling unit (MDU) at 160 Elgin Street, Ottawa, ON (the MDU) owned by 160 Elgin Portfolio Inc. and managed by H&R Property Management Ltd (the Respondents).
In its application, Atria submitted that an expedited filing schedule was necessary in order to implement service to a customer within the MDU. Accordingly, Atria requested that the Commission, pursuant to the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, abridge the time period to provide the Respondents with five (5) days or three (3) business days (whichever is shorter) in which to respond to the request for an interim order, and Atria
three (3) days or one (1) business day (whichever is shorter) in which to reply.
On 19 May 2010, McCarthy Tétrault, counsel to the Respondents, requested an extension for their response to 21 May 2010.
In the circumstances, the requested two day extension for the filing of the Respondents’ above-noted response is considered reasonable.
Accordingly, the Respondents are required to file their response on 21 May 2010, and Atria is required to file its reply on 26 May 2010.
Documents to be filed and served in accordance with the above process are to be received, not merely sent, by the date indicated. Copies of the documents should also be sent to the following email address: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Original signed by
Lynne Fancy for Mario Bertrand
Director, Competition Implementation and Technology
c.c.: Mr. S. Posen email@example.com
Mr. E. Janssen Ejanssen@hr-dev.com
Ms. E. McCaffrey firstname.lastname@example.org
Kevin Pickell email@example.com
- Date modified: