ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 21 January 2010
Our Reference: 8622-D11-200917114
Mr. Donald Cavanagh
Vice President – Telecommunications
Distributel Communications Limited
Suite 300, 177 Nepean Street
Ottawa, Ontario K2P 0B4
Mr. Yuval Barzakay
Comwave Telecom Inc.
61 Wildcat Rd.
Toronto, Ontario M3J 2P5
Ms. Brenda Stevens
Director, Intercarrier Relations
Rogers Cable Communications Inc.
333 Bloor Street East, 9th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M4W 1G9
Ms. Dina Graser
Barristers & Solicitors
250 Yonge Street, Suite 2400
Toronto, Ontario M5B 2M6
Mr. Marcel Mercia
Chief Operating Officer
300 West Tower, 1144 – 29th Ave. NE
Calgary, Alberta T2E 7P1
Dear Madams, Sirs:
Re: Bulk Porting of Telephone Numbers Acquired by Distributel – Further Process
In a letter dated 18 January 2010 to Commission staff, Comwave Telecom Inc. (Comwave) expressed concerns that Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) had not filed a submission on 15 January 2010 in accordance with the process established in the Commission staff letter dated 23 December 2009. Comwave requested that the Commission order Distributel to file a submission and amend the process to allow parties more time to file their response to submissions. Comwave also asked that it be permitted to file a final reply along with Distributel.
Distributel replied to Comwave’s letter in a letter, dated 20 January 2010, to Commission staff noting that, in its view, its 14 December 2009 application served as Distributel’s submission in this matter. Distributel further noted that it is the customary practice of the CRTC that the applicant has the right of final reply.
Commission staff notes that Comwave, in its 15 December 2009 letter to Commission staff, had requested that the Commission amend the process so that Comwave could submit comments on Distributel’s application, and this was done. Commission staff notes that, with its 15 January 2010 filing to the Commission, Comwave has provided its comments on Distributel’s application, and in the next round of submissions, Comwave will have the opportunity to provide comments on the other parties’ submissions.
Commission staff notes Comwave’s concern that without a submission by Distributel, Comwave will have had no opportunity to respond to any substantive arguments made by Distributel. In this regard, Commission staff notes that Distributel’s application serves as Distributel’s initial submission, and Comwave has had the opportunity to respond.
Commission staff further notes that Comwave submitted that Distributel’s application contained very little information and that Comwave should have the benefit of full submissions from Distributel in order to make a full and fair response. In this regard, Commission staff notes that in accordance with the Commission’s general practice, Distributel is not permitted to provide any new facts or evidence in its final reply.
Commission staff, therefore, sees no need to modify this process, with the exception of filing dates, due to the time required to resolve Comwave’s concerns. The filing dates for the balance of the proceeding will therefore be:
By 26 January 2010, the parties may file with the Commission, serving a copy on each other, their reply to the submissions by other parties.
By 29 January 2010, Distributel may file with the Commission, serving a copy on the other parties its final comments on this matter.
Where a document is to be filed or served by a specific date, the document must be actually received, not merely sent, by that date.
Original signed by
Competition, Costing and Tariffs
- Date modified: