ARCHIVED - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2010-43-2
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Additional references : 2010-43, 2010-43-1 and 2010-43-3 | |
Ottawa, 30 March 2010 | |
Notice of consultation and hearing | |
Obligation to serve and other matters | |
File numbers: 8663-C12-201000653, 8663-C12-200912437, and 8663-C12-200909658 | |
Changes to procedure – Forbearance framework for mobile wireless data services | |
1. | In Telecom Notice of Consultation 2010-43,1 the Commission announced its intention to review, among other things, the appropriateness of the existing forbearance framework for mobile wireless data services. By letter dated 10 March 2010, the Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association (CWTA), on behalf of its carrier members, submitted that this issue should be removed from the context of this proceeding and be considered in a separate process. Further, the CWTA stated that its carrier members were prepared to support the reapplication of section 24 and subsection 27(2) of the Telecommunications Act (the Act) to mobile wireless data services. Parties who commented offered general support for the CWTA's submission. |
2. | The Commission considers that, consistent with its practice, if subsection 27(2) of the Act is applied to mobile wireless data services, subsections 27(3) and 27(4) would also be applied. The Commission generally agrees with the CWTA's proposal, but finds that it would be more appropriate to conduct a separate written process within this proceeding, as set out below, to consider reapplying only section 24 and subsections 27(2), 27(3), and 27(4) of the Act to mobile wireless data services. Therefore, parties' comments on this issue are not to be included in their initial evidence filed pursuant to paragraph 35 of Telecom Notice of Consultation 2010-43, as modified below. |
3. | In light of the above, the Commission establishes the following process: |
| |
| |
Changes to procedure – Initial comments and other dates | |
4. | By letter dated 12 March 2010, the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) requested a two-week extension for the filing of initial evidence and comments, from 12 April 2010 to 26 April 2010. PIAC proposed that no other modifications to the schedule be made. |
5. | While most parties were in agreement with PIAC's request, some submitted that all subsequent deadlines in this proceeding should also be extended by two weeks. |
6. | After considering the submissions received, the Commission announces the following changes to the dates set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation 2010-43 (changes are in bold italics). There will be no change to the oral hearing schedule. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Secretary General | |
This document is available in alternative format upon request, and may also be examined in PDF format or in HTML at the following Internet site: http://www.crtc.gc.ca. ___________________________ Footnote: 1 Proceeding to review access to basic telecommunications services and other matters, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2010-43, 28 January 2010, as amended by Obligation to serve and other matters, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2010-43-1, 5 March 2010 |
- Date modified: