ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter - 8698-C151-200705072
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
LetterOttawa, 4 May 2007 File No. 8698-C151-200705072 By E-mail
Mr. Christopher J. Edwards, Dear Mr. Edwards : Re: Part VII Application regarding Central Office Code Obligations for Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) On 2 April 2007, the Commission received a Part VII application by Canadian Cable Systems Alliance Inc. (CCSA) requesting that the Commission grant relief from the obligation established in Telecom Decision CRTC 97-8 ("Decision 97-8") to require competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) to obtain at least one Central Office code (NXX) for each incumbent local exchange carrier (ILEC) exchange where the CLEC is relying on the underlying LEC for use of their switching infrastructure and the corresponding interconnections to the public-switched telephone network (PSTN). In Service standards for the disposition of telecommunications applications , Telecom Circular CRTC 2006-11, 7 December 2006 , the Commission stated that it would categorize Part VII applications into two types: Type 1 applications that generally do not involve multiple parties or raise significant policy issues and Type 2 applications that do involve multiple parties and/or raise significant policy issues The Commission also adopted the following service standards for Part VII applications:
The Commission stated that it would inform applicants, by letter, within 10 days of the end of the comment period for applications, whether the application is considered to be a Type 1 or Type 2 application, and the applicable service standard. Commission staff has assessed the above application and considers it to be a Type 1 application. Accordingly, the Commission expects to issue an interim or final determination within 4 months of the close-of-record. Yours sincerely, 'Original signed by L. Fancy'
Lynne Fancy cc: James Ndirangu (819 997 3670) Date Modified: 2007-05-04 |
- Date modified: