ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter - 8652-C12-200312265
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Letter
Ottawa, 13 May 2005
File No. 8652-C12-200312265
BY E-MAIL
To: Attached Distribution List
Re: Modifications to the General Tariff Economic Study Report Guidelines
This letter and its attachment relate to economic study requirements that apply to each large incumbent local exchange carrier (ILEC) with respect to General Tariff (GT) services, including GT service bundles. The manner in which the Commission's current filing requirements for economic studies and the imputation test are to be applied to local voice communications services using Internet Protocol (VoIP services) as a result of Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol, Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28, 12 May 2005 (Decision 2005-28) are set out below.
The GT Economic Study Report Guidelines attached to this letter reflect housekeeping changes and also reflect, as required, the discussion below.
Commission staff is of the view that the GT Economic Study Report Guidelines apply in the following manner with respect to costs associated with offering in-territory local voice communications services using Internet Protocol (VoIP services) in respect of which a tariff is required by Decision 2005-28, including local VoIP services offered in a GT service bundle.
If access is not part of the ILEC's VoIP service:
a) the associated imputation test must include the costs of all Category 1 Competitor service components by imputing the applicable tariffed rates and must include the Phase II costs for other service components (e.g., costs causal to the VoIP service, VoIP-specific hardware and software, telephone number costs, and all expenses including service order costs as applicable). It is further noted that separate imputation tests must be provided by market segment (e.g., business/residence) and,
b) to the extent the ILEC uses its access facilities to provision the service, the ILEC is to describe the facilities in question, and to explain how the associated costs will be recovered. For example, if the ILEC's VoIP service is provided in conjunction with the ILEC's forborne retail high-speed internet service, the ILEC must explain with supporting rationale how the associated access costs are recovered.
If access is part of the ILEC's VoIP service, the associated imputation test must respond to the requirements identified in paragraph 1 a) above, be provided at the rate band level, define the access component of the service and include all access costs (e.g., the applicable unbundled loop tariffed rates for loop costs, and associated electronics).
If a bundle includes residential VoIP service, the cost of that service is included in the imputation test at the applicable tariffed rate.
Yours sincerely,
Original signed by Yvan Davidson
Yvan Davidson
Senior Manager, Competitor Services & Costing
cc: Parties to Public Notice 2003-10
Parties to Public Notice 2004-2
CRTC Public Examination Room
Attach
- Date modified: