Search

ARCHIVED - Telecom - Commission Letter - 8740-O2-082/02 - Network Access Tariff(NAT) Notice No. 82

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.

 

Our file: 8740-O2-0082/02

Ottawa, 8 August 2002

BY FAX

Ontario Telecommunications Association
150 Isabella Street, Suit 301
Ottawa, Ontario
K1S 5P7

Attention: Gary Mallette

Subject: Network Access Tariff (NAT) Notice No. 82

The Commission staff is in receipt of an application from the Ontario Telecommunications Association (OTA) dated 11July 2002 requesting approval of the final 2001 Network Access Tariff (NAT).

In the attachment to this letter, the Commission staff is requesting further details with respect to the information provided by the OTA.

Please provide responses by 30August 2002 with copies served on interested parties.

Interested parties listed are to provide comments on the responses to these interrogatories by 6 September 2002.

Reply comments, if necessary, are to be filed with the Commission by 13 September 2002.

Yours sincerely,

Donna K. Malliff (819) 997-9253
Manager,
Independent Telephone Companies

cc: Interested parties - Bell Canada

Attachment

1.  In column (A) of the worksheet in Section II of the filing, OTA refers to "2001 Phase III Network Costs".

  1. Confirm that the Phase III Network Costs used are actual 2001 data
  2. Provide a copy of the 2001 actual Phase III calculations for each company.

2. Provide an explanation of change in 2001 actual Phase III costs compared to 2000 actual Phase III costs. Include the estimated impact due to changes in the number of circuits from 2000 to 2001.

Date modified: