2001/05/03 - #: 8690-B29-01/01 - Bell Intrigna - Demande d'accès aux servitures pour les structures de soutènement de ENMAX Corporation et ses filiales; ENMAX Power Corporation et ENMAX Energy Corporation, à l'intérieur et autour de la Ville de Calgary

2004/07/-29 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Description: Lettre adresée à Osler, Hoskin and Harcourt - Objet: Demande d'accès aux servitures pour les structures de soutènement de ENMAX Corporation et ses filiales; ENMAX Power Corporation et ENMAX Energy Corporation, à l'intérieur et autour de la Ville de Calgary

2004/07/26 - Hosler, Hoskin & Harcourt on behalf of Bell West Inc.
Description: We are writing to advise that our client has reached an agreement with ENMAX.
Document: 040726.pdf - 98KBO

2002/10/11 - Bell West Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out in the Commission's letter of August 15, 2002, the following constitutes the Reply of Bell West Inc. (formerly Bell Intrigna Inc. and hereinafter referred to as "Bell West") to the interrogatory responses and submissions that were recently filed with the Commission by ENMAX Envision Inc. ("Envision"), TELUS Communications Inc. ("Telus") and Shaw Communications Inc. ("Shaw") in the above-referenced proceeding
Document: 021011.doc - 85KO

2002/09/30 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description:  These comments are submitted by Shaw Communications pursuant to the Commission's letter dated August 15, 2002, in which the Commission established a "further process" in respect to the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 020930.pdf - 436KO

2002/09/30 - Goodmans LLP au nom de ENMAX Companies
Description: We are writing on behalf of ENMAX Envision Inc. ("Envision") in response to a letter from Ms. Soehn dated August 15, 2002.
Document: 020930.doc - 179KO

2002/09/30 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS Communications Inc. ("TELUS") is in receipt of the letter from the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (the "Commission") dated August 15, 2002, in which ENMAX Envision Inc., TELUS and Shaw Communications Inc. ("Shaw") were made parties to the above proceeding.
Document: 020930.doc - 58KO

2002/08/30 - Goodmans LLP au nom de ENMAX Companies
Description: We are in receipt of MS Soehn's letter of August 15, 2002 that, among other things, seeks answers from ENMAX Envision Inc. concerning two interrogatories.
Document: 020830.zip - 86KO

2002/08/30 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedure set out in the Commission letter of August 15, 2002 TELUS Communications Inc. ("TELUS") files herewith its responses to the CRTC interrogatories.
Document: 020830_1.zip - 25KO

2002/08/29 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description:  Shaw Communications is in receipt of a letter from the Commission dated August 15, 2002, in which Shaw, ENMAX Envision Inc. and TELUS Communications were made parties in the above-noted proceeding and were asked to answer a number of Commission interrogatories.
Document: 020829.pdf - 296KO

2002/08/28 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description:  Further to the letter from Goodmans LLP to you dated August 21, 2002, please find enclosed a copy of a letter from TELUS to Goodmans LLP dated as of today's date by way of response to the correspondance from that firm to TELUS also dated August 21, 2002.
Document: 020828.pdf - 134KO

2002/08/21 - Goodmans LLP au nom de ENMAX Companies
Description: We are writing to update you concerning a recent development in this matters.
Document: 020821.zip - 64KO

2002/03/05 - Goodmans LLP au nom de ENMAX Companies
Description: We are writing as counsel on behalf of ENMAX Corporation ("EC"), ENMAX Energy Corporation ("EEC"), ENMAX Power Corporation ("EPC") and ENMAX Envision Inc. ("Envision") and further to Mr. Godin's procedural letter of February 6, 2002. These submissions are made without prejudice to EC, EEC and EPC's jurisdictional objections.
Document: 020305.doc - 185KO

2002/02/13 - Goodmans LLP au nom de ENMAX Companies
Description:  Kindly direct to us all communications, including correspondence and submission.  At our client's request, we ask that the Commission and parties refrain from copying directly Messrs.
Document: 020213.pdf - 68KO

2002/02/07 - Goodmans LLP au nom de ENMAX Companies
Description: Please find attached a cover letter and three agreements filed pursuant to the Commission's letters of February 6, 2002 in the above noted Part VII applications.
Document: 020207.zip - 2311KO

2002/02/06 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Description: Lettre adressée à Bell Intrigna Inc., ENMAX Envision Inc. et Peter Ruby de Goodmans - Objet: Bell Intrigna Inc. - Demande d'accès aux servitures pour les structures de soutènement de ENMAX Corporation et ses filiales; ENMAX Power Corporation et ENMAX Energy Corporation, à l'intérieur et autour de la Ville de Calgary - Autre Processus

2002/02/06 - Goodmans LLP au nom de ENMAX Companies
Description: Leanne Bennett, counsel for the Commission, requested by e-mail dated January 18, 2002 that ENMAX Corporation, ENMAX Energy Corporation ("EEC") and ENMAX Power Corporation ("EPC") provide to the Commission certain information.
Document: 020206.doc - 175KO

2002/01/22 - Goodmans LLP au nom de ENMAX Companies
Description: We are writing in response to Ms Bennett's e-mail of January 18, 2002 seeking to update our letter of January 7, 2002. For your convenience we enclose a copy of Ms. Bennett's e-mail.
Document: 020122.zip - 24KO

2002/01/07 - Goodmans LLP au nom de ENMAX Companies
Description: We are writing to advise you on behalf of our clients, ENMAX Corporation, ENMAX Energy Corporation and ENMAX Power Corporation that a new corporate entity has been formed as a subsidiary of ENMAX Corporation, named ENMAX Envision Inc. ("Envision").
Document: 020107.zip - 70KO

2001/10/24 - Goodmans LLP au nom de ENMAX Companies
Decription: We are in receipt of a letter to the Commission from Bell Intrigna dated September 27, 2001 enclosing Bell Intrigna's ("Bell") jurisdiction submissions.
Document:
011024.doc - 183KO

2001/10/16 - Bell Intrigna
Description:  Bell Intrigna, is in receipt of a letter to the Commission from Goodmans LLP, counsel for ENMAX Power Corporation ("EPC"), dated September 28, 2001, regarding a Part VII Application which was filed by Suite Systems Inc. ("Suite Systems") against TELUS Communications Inc. ("TELUS") regarding pole attachment positions to which TELUS enjoys rights of access.
Document: 011016.pdf - 155KO

en haut

2001/09/27 - Bell Intrigna
Description:  Further to the procedures set out in a letter from Mr. Mike Cawood of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission ("CRTC or the "Commission") date August 15, 2001, Bell Intrigna ("Intrigna") is pleased hereby to attach its Submission in support of the Commission's jurisdiction to deal with the Application filed by Intrigna on May 3, 2001.
Document: 010927.pdf - 2906KO

2001/09/06 - ENMAX Corporation
Description: Please find the jurisdictional submissions of ENMAX Corporation, on behalf of itself, ENMAX Power Corporation and ENMAX Energy Corporation. We also enclose the attachments to these submissions.
Document:
010906.zip - 1912KO

2001/08/30 - Goodmans LLP au nom de ENMAX Companies
Description: Please find attached the answers of ENMAX Corporation on behalf of itself, ENMAX Power Corporation and ENMAX Energy Corporation (collectively "ENMAX") to the interrogatories posed by Mr. Cawood.
Document:
010830.zip - 30KO

2001/08/23 - Bell Intrigna
Description:  Bell Intrigna Inc. ("Intrigna" or the "Applicant") is in receipt of a letter from the Commission dated August 15, 2001 in which, among other things, the Commission directs Intrigna to file with the Commission by August 23, 2001 "Clarification of the starting and destination points of the support structures to which it seeks access".
Document: 010823.pdf - 121KO

2001/08/15 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Description: Lettre adressée à Bell Intrigan et Enmax Corporation - Objet: Demande d'accès aux servitures pour les structures de soutènement de ENMAX Corporation et ses filiales; ENMAX Power Corporation et ENMAX Energy Corporation, à l'intérieur et autour de la Ville de Calgary.

001/07/31 - Lettre du Conseil - Version anglaise seulement - "Version imprimée"
Description:  Lettre adressée à Bell Intrigna Inc. & ENMAX Corporation - Objet:  En réponse à la lettre du 18 juillet 2001, concernant la demande des avocats de ENMAX Corporation, ENMAX Power Corporation et ENMAX Energy Corporation.

2001/07/18 - Goodmans LLP au nom de ENMAX Companies
Description:  We are writing to bring to the Commission's attention the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal allowing the appeal of Telecom Decision CRTC 99-13.
Document: 010718.doc - 175KO

2001/07/12 - Bell Intrigna
Description:  Please find attached the Reply of Bell Intrigna Inc. ("Intrigna" or the "Applicant") in the above-referenced proceeding.
Document: 010712.pdf - 2313KO

2001/07/04 - Goodmans LLP au nom de ENMAX Companies
Descriptions: We are in receipt of a letter from Bell Intrigna Inc. ("Bell") to the Commission dated June 27, 2001, but provided to ENMAX on June 28, 2001(the "Bell Letter"). While we do not propose to answer herein each and every allegation made by Bell in its letter, a response is appropriate for the two new forms of relief requested by Bell in the Bell Letter, i.e. an interim order and CRTC Staff assisted mediation.
Document:
010704.doc - 51KO

en haut

2001/06/29 - ENMAX Corporation
Description:  I am in receipt of a copy of your letter dated June 27, 2001 to the Secretary General of the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission.
Document: 010629.pdf - 57KO

2001/06/27 - Bell Intrigna
Description:  On June 8, Bell Intrigna Inc. ("Intrigna" or the "Applicant") filed a letter with the Commission indicating that it had received an Answer to the above-referenced Part VII Application from ENMAX Corporation which was dated June 4, 2001 and submitted on behalf of ENMAX Corporation as well as its two subsidiaries, ENMAX Power Corporation ("EPC") and EMAX Energy Corporation ("EEC") (collectively, "ENMAX" or the "Respondents").
Document: 010627.pdf - 724KO

2001/06/20 - ENMAX
Description: We are in receipt of a copy of a letter dated June 8, 2001 from Bell Intrigna Ltd. ("Bell") to the Commission (the "Procedural Letter"). Bell has repeated its request for ENMAX Corporation, ENMAX Energy Corporation and ENMAX Power Corporation (collectively "ENMAX") to be ordered to answer the interrogatories appended to Bell's Application and provide its jurisdictional submissions at this time and has requested it be granted expedited relief.
Document:
010620.zip - 84KO

2001/06/08 - Bell Intrigna Inc.
Description:  Please find below a request by Bell Intrigna Inc. ("Intrigna" or the "Applicant") for various procedural orders from the Commission in connection with the above-referenced application.
Document: 010608.pdf - 513KO

2001/06/04 - ENMAX Corporation
Description: Attached please find the Answer by ENMAX Corporation and its subsidiaries, ENMAX Power Corporation and ENMAX Energy Corporation to Bell Intrigna Inc.
Document:
010604.zip - 39KO

2001/05/03 - Bell Intrigna
Description:  Application for rights of access to the support structures of ENMAX Corporation and its subsidiaires; ENMAX Power Corporation and ENMAX Energy Corporation, in and around the City of Calgary.
Document: 010503.pdf - 2342KO

Mise à jour : 2004-08-03

Date de modification :

2004-08-03