Search

Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC): 8622-P8-201017153

Application to request for an order requiring the Bell companies to halt their $100 coupon campaign

2010-12-22 - Telecom decision CRTC 2010-955 Public Interest Advocacy Centre – Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership’s and Bell Canada’s compliance with Telecom Decisions 2010-637 and 2010-805 regarding the rebate plan
File number: 8622-P8-201017153

2010-12-08 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in the Commission letter of December 1, 2010 PIAC is submitting its reply comments to the response of the Bell Companies of December 6, 2010.
Document: 1474515.pdf - 3563KB

2010-12-06 - Execulink Telecom Inc. in conjunction with Bruce Telecom, Huron Telecommunications Co-operative Limited, Mornington Communications Co-operative Limited, Nexicom Telecommunications Inc., North Renfrew Telephone Company, Ontera, Tuckersmith Communications Co-operative Limited, Wightman Telecom Limited and WTC Communications (the Competitors)
Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (“Execulink”) in conjunction with Bruce Telecom, Huron Telecommunications Co-operative Limited, Mornington Communications Co-operative Limited, Nexicom Telecommunications Inc., the North Renfrew Telephone Company, Ontera, Tuckersmith Communications Co-operative Limited, Wightman Telecom Limited and WTC Communications (collectively “the Competitors”) are in receipt of a Part VII Application, dated 29 November 2010, by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (“PIAC”) which requests that the Commission stop the Bell companies’ $100 coupon campaign.
Document: 1471966.pdf - 251KB

2010-12-06 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of an application dated 29 November 2010 submitted by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) to the Commission pertaining to the Companies' consumer rebate program. 
Document: 1471950.doc - 89KB

2010-12-06 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission 1 December 2010 letter regarding the above-noted subject, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) is submitting the following comments.
Document: 1471946.pdf - 25KB

2010-12-06 - Bragg Communications Inc., operating as EastLink
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., operating as EastLink (“EastLink”), wishes to express support for the letter filed with the Commission on 29 November 2010 by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (“PIAC”), concerning Bell Canada’s rebate activities associated with the disposal of Deferral Account funds.
Document: 1471942.pdf - 75KB

2010-12-01 - Commission Letter
Description:  Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Request by PIAC for an order requiring the Bell companies to halt their $100 coupon campaign

2010-11-29 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications (Rogers) wishes to express its support for the letter filed with the Commission on November 29, 2010 by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) concerning Bell Canada’s rate rebate activities associated with the disposal of Deferral Account funds.
Document: 1467816.pdf - 44KB

2010-11-29 - Quebecor Media inc. au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron ltée
Description: Par la présente, Quebecor Media inc. (QMi), au nom de sa filiale Vidéotron ltée (Vidéotron), tient à exprimer son support à la lettre que le Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) vous a fait parvenir en date d’aujourd’hui, dans le cadre de laquelle PIAC demande au Conseil d’émettre une ordonnance enjoignant Bell Canada et Bell Aliant (les compagnies Bell) de mettre immédiatement fin à la campagne de marketing qu’elles ont récemment lancée dans le but de disposer d’une partie des fonds à leurs comptes de report.
Document: 1467162.pdf - 133KB

2010-11-29 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: We are writing with regard the marketing campaign recently launched by Bell Canada and Bell Aliant to dispose of part of the funds in their deferral accounts. This campaign offends consumers, violates the Commission's directives, and should be stopped.
Document: 1467053.pdf - 2891KB

Date modified: