Follow-up to Decision 2003-62: 8638-C12-200314211

Allstream v. MTS - Sherbrook Central Office (Show cause)

2005-09-09 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-51 T he Commission directs incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) to provide network reconfiguration information to affected competitive local exchange carriers at least six months prior to the planned implementation date of an ILEC-initiated local network reconfiguration. Reference: 8638-C12-200314211.

2003-10-17 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-71. The Commission denies an application by MTS Communications Inc. for a stay of Allstream v. MTS - Sherbrook Central Office, Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-62. Reference: 8638-C12-200314211 and 8622-A4-20/02.

2003-11-04 - Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Description: Call-Net Enterprises Inc. submits the following Reply comments pursuant to the procedure established by the Commission in Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-62, Allstream v. MTS - Sherbrook Central Office, September 19, 2003.
Document: 031104.doc - 52KB

2003-11-04 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies)
Description: The Companies are in receipt of comments from: Allstream, dated 20 October 2003; Call Net Enterprises, dated 21 October 2003; FCI Broadband, dated 21 October 2003; Microcell Telecommunications, dated 20 October 2003 and from TELUS Communications Inc. and TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. (collectively, TELUS), dated 20 October 2003, (collectively, the Competitors); regarding notification of ILEC network changes.
Document: 031104.doc - 576KB

2003-11-04 - FCI Broadband
Description: FCI Broadband hereby files its reply comments.
Document: 031104.doc - 67KB

2003-11-03 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Allstream is in receipt of a letter from MTS, dated 21 October 2003 wherein MTS indicates its support for the position put forward by Aliant Telecom, Bell Canada, MTS Communications, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec société en commandite, dated 20 October 2003 (collectively, the Companies), and from TELUS Communications Inc. and TELUS Communications (Quebec) Inc. (collectively, TELUS), (collectively, the ILECs).
Document: 031103_1.doc - 266KB

2003-10-21 - Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Description: Call-Net submits the following comments pursuant to the procedure established by the Commission in Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-62, Allstream v. MTS - Sherbrook Central Office, September 19, 2003.
Document: 031021.doc - 58KB

2003-10-21 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite
Description: Please find attached, comments regarding notification of ILEC network changes pursuant to the directives contained in Decision 2003-62 and in the Commission's 17 October 2003 letter regarding the same subject.
Document: 031021.zip - 295KB

2003-10-21 - FCI Broadband
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Allstream v. MTS - Sherbrook Central Office, Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-62, 19 September 2003, FCI Broadband hereby submits its comments in response to the Commission's show cause process
Document: 031021.doc - 69KB

2003-10-20 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In Telecom Decision 2003-62, the Commission established a further process to allow parties the opportunity to comment on its preliminary views with respect to Commission proposed procedure for the implementation of network reconfigurations affecting competitors and the responsibility of affected carriers for the costs incurred resulting from network reconfigurations
Document: 031020.doc - 56KB

2003-10-20 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Pursuant to the directives set out at paragraph 33 of Decision 2003-62 (the Decision) Allstream Corp. (Allstream) hereby files comments on the shows cause proceeding initiated in the Decision.
Document: 031020.doc - 267KB

2003-10-20 - MTS Communications Inc.
Description: MTS notes there are two show cause directions in Decision 2003-62. The first is contained in paragraph 33 which states...
Document: 031020.doc - 130KB

2003-10-20 - Microcell Solutions Inc.
Description: At paragraph 32 of Decision 2003-62, the Commission expressed its preliminary view that the Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs) should provide the following information to affected parties at least six months prior to the planned implementation date of a local network reconfiguration
Document: 031020.doc - 41KB

2003-10-17 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Allstream is in receipt of MTS' letter filed with the Commission on 10 October 2003 informing the Commission of its intent to file for review and vary of Decision 2003-62 and requesting a stay of the show cause proceeding initiated by that Decision
Document: 031017.doc - 263KB

2003-10-10 - MTS Communications Inc.
Description: In Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-62, Allstream v. MTS - Sherbrook Central Office, (Decision 2003-62), issued September 19, 2003, "the Commission determined that MTS is responsible for the costs of the conditioning equipment, and its installation and maintenance necessary to provide digital Centrex service to Allstream's customer".
Document: 031010.doc - 136KB

Date modified:

2005-09-29